Aims

Limb-lengthening nails have largely replaced external fixation in limb-lengthening and reconstructive surgery. However, the adverse events and high prevalence of radiological changes recently noted with the STRYDE lengthening nail have raised concerns about the use of internal lengthening nails. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of radiological bone abnormalities between STRYDE, PRECICE, and FITBONE nails prior to nail removal.

Introduction. Routine radiographs in the follow-up of circular frames is commonplace, however the effect on clinical decision making is unclear. Previous work locally has suggested that >95% of radiographs, particularly at early time points, do not affect clinical management. This study was conducted to assess the impact of a transition to early remote follow-up on circular frame patients with limited radiographic assessment. Materials and Methods. Patients were identified from a prospective limb reconstruction database. Data were collected including the number of clinic appointments, type of clinic appointment, number of radiographs performed, and impact this had on clinical management. This was compared to our previous cohort of 85 patients undergoing standard follow-up. Results. Fourteen patients were eligible for inclusion (mean age 45, range 26–75). Circular frames were indicated for trauma (12), or limb reconstruction (2). Following introduction of remote follow-up, the mean number of face-to-face appointments reduced from 6.1 to 1.7 to the point of frame removal. Conversion from telephone follow-up to face-to-face follow-up was required in just one case where hardware failure occurred. The number of radiographs during treatment was reduced from a mean of 22 to 11 (range 4–20). Conclusions. Remote follow-up of circular frame patients was associated with significantly fewer radiographs and face-to-face appointments, without significantly increasing complications. We believe this is a safe and effective method of follow-up, optimising resource use in line with the NHS long term plan. Data collection is ongoing, and a larger cohort would be available for presentation

Polyethylene wear represents a significant risk factor for the long-term success of knee arthroplasty [1]. This work aimed to develop and in vivo validate an automated algorithm for accurate and precise AI based wear measurement in knee arthroplasty using clinical AP radiographs for scientifically meaningful multi-centre studies. Twenty postoperative radiographs (knee joint AP in standing position) after knee arthroplasty were analysed using the novel algorithm. A convolutional neural network-based segmentation is used to localize the implant components on the X-Ray, and a 2D-3D registration of the CAD implant models precisely calculates the three-dimensional position and orientation of the implants in the joint at the time of acquisition. From this, the minimal distance between the involved implant components is determined, and its postoperative change over time enables the determination of wear in the radiographs. The measured minimum inlay height of 335 unloaded inlays excluding the weight-induced deformation, served as ground truth for validation and was compared to the algorithmically calculated component distances from 20 radiographs. With an average weight of 94 kg in the studied TKA patient cohort, it was determined that an average inlay height of 6.160 mm is expected in the patient. Based on the radiographs, the algorithm calculated a minimum component distance of 6.158 mm (SD = 81 µm), which deviated by 2 µm in comparison to the expected inlay height. An automated method was presented that allows accurate and precise determination of the inlay height and subsequently the wear in knee arthroplasty based on a clinical radiograph and the CAD models. Precision and accuracy are comparable to the current gold standard RSA [2], but without relying on special radiographic setups. The developed method can therefore be used to objectively investigate novel implant materials with meaningful clinical cohorts, thus improving the quality of patient care

Over the last few years low dose digital radiography (DR) has all but replaced traditional chemical image processing. This appears to have created a paradigm shift in the suitability of intraoperative radiographic guidance for total hip arthroplasty. It is the purpose of this publication to describe our preferred technique and assess its reliability in achieving the desired parameters of a successful total hip arthroplasty. A consecutive prospective evaluation of 150 primary total hip arthroplasties employing intraoperative digital radiography was carried out. An anteroposterior pelvic radiograph with the patient in the lateral decubitus position was obtained for all hips. The orientation of the intraoperative film was matched to that of the preoperative pelvic radiograph. The image was taken after placement of the acetabular component and best estimate of femoral trial size, position, and head and neck length. The DR system produced an image within 6 seconds of exposure. This trial radiograph was then used to make adjustments. Given that the cassette does not have to be moved for image processing, a precise anteroposterior film was obtained by simply adjusting the operating table. Two to three minutes were allotted for each radiograph. Corrections to stem size, cup position, screw length and position, limb length, and offset were made based on this intraoperative radiograph. The final intraoperative image was then compared to a postoperative standard radiograph in supine position at 2 weeks after total hip arthroplasty to verify the accuracy of intraoperative digital radiography. Abduction angle, limb length, offset, and canal fit and fill were assessed for confirmation of the validity of the intraoperative imaging technique. Acetabular abduction angle was determined with a mean of 43 degrees (range, 35 to 48 degrees). The intraoperative measurement was within 3 degrees of the postoperative measurement in all cases. Adjustment of acetabular cup orientation was performed 10% of the time based on the intraoperative radiograph. Apposition was within 2 mm 100% of the time. Re-seating of the cup was carried out in one hip only. Femoral component was neutral in 92% and between 3 and 5 degrees of varus in 8%. Femoral component was upsized 55% of the time. Intraoperatively measured limb length discrepancy and offset were within 3 mm of the postoperative measurement in all hips. Intraoperative digital imaging is a reliable tool for achieving the desired radiographic results in THA. The technique is efficient and affordable. The high rate of success in this series suggests that this technology should contribute to a paradigm shift in the standard of care in total hip arthroplasty

Evaluation of patient specific spinopelvic mobility requires the detection of bony landmarks in lateral functional radiographs. Current manual landmarking methods are inefficient, and subjective. This study proposes a deep learning model to automate landmark detection and derivation of spinopelvic measurements (SPM).

A deep learning model was developed using an international multicenter imaging database of 26,109 landmarked preoperative, and postoperative, lateral functional radiographs (HREC: Bellberry: 2020-08-764-A-2). Three functional positions were analysed: 1) standing, 2) contralateral step-up and 3) flexed seated. Landmarks were manually captured and independently verified by qualified engineers during pre-operative planning with additional assistance of 3D computed tomography derived landmarks. Pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), and lumbar lordotic angle (LLA) were derived from the predicted landmark coordinates. Interobserver variability was explored in a pilot study, consisting of 9 qualified engineers, annotating three functional images, while blinded to additional 3D information. The dataset was subdivided into 70:20:10 for training, validation, and testing.

The model produced a mean absolute error (MAE), for PT, SS, and LLA of 1.7°±3.1°, 3.4°±3.8°, 4.9°±4.5°, respectively. PT MAE values were dependent on functional position: standing 1.2°±1.3°, step 1.7°±4.0°, and seated 2.4°±3.3°, p< 0.001. The mean model prediction time was 0.7 seconds per image. The interobserver 95% confidence interval (CI) for engineer measured PT, SS and LLA (1.9°, 1.9°, 3.1°, respectively) was comparable to the MAE values generated by the model.

The model MAE reported comparable performance to the gold standard when blinded to additional 3D information. LLA prediction produced the lowest SPM accuracy potentially due to error propagation from the SS and L1 landmarks. Reduced PT accuracy in step and seated functional positions may be attributed to an increased occlusion of the pubic-symphysis landmark. Our model shows excellent performance when compared against the current gold standard manual annotation process.

Anteroposterior (AP) radiographs remain the standard of care for pre- and post-operative imaging during total hip arthroplasty (THA), despite known limitation of plain films, including the inability to adequately account for distortion caused by variations in pelvic orientation. Of specific interest to THA surgeons are distortions associated with pelvic tilt, as unaccounted for tilt can significantly alter radiographic measurements of cup position. Several authors have proposed methods for correcting for pelvic tilt on radiographs but none have proven reliable in a THA population. The purpose of our study was to develop a method for correcting pelvic tilt on AP radiographs in patients undergoing primary or revision THA. CT scans from 20 patients/cadaver specimens (10 male, 10 female) were used to create 3D renderings, from which synthetic radiographs of each pelvis were generated (Figure 1). For each pelvis, 13 synthetic radiographs were generated, showing the pelvis at between −30° and 30° of pelvic tilt, in 5° increments. On each image, 8 unique parameters/distances were measured to determine the most appropriate parameters for calculation of pelvic tilt (Figure 2). The most reliable and accurate of these parameters was determined via regression analysis and used to create gender-specific nomograms from which pelvic tilt measurements could be calculated (Figure 3). The accuracy and reliability of the nomograms and correction method were subsequently validated using both synthetic radiographs (n=50) and stereoradiographic images (n=58). Of 8 parameters measured, the vertical distance between the superior margin of the pubic symphysis and the transischial line (PSTI) was determined to be the most reliable (r=−0.96, ICC=0.94). Mean tilt calculated from synthetic radiographs (0.6°±18.6°) correlated very strongly (r=0.96) with mean known tilt (0.5°±17.9°, p=0.98). Mean pelvic tilt calculated from AP EOS images (3.2°±9.9°) correlated strongly (r=0.77) with mean tilt measured from lateral EOS images (3.8°±8.2°, p=0.74). No gender differences were noted in mean tilt measurements in synthetic images (p=0.98) or EOS images (p=0.45). Our method of measuring PSTI and POD on AP images and applying these measurements to nomograms provides a validated and reliable method for estimating the degree of pelvic tilt on AP radiographs during THA. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Diagnostic interpretation error of paediatric musculoskeletal (MSK) radiographs can lead to late presentation of injuries that subsequently require more invasive surgical interventions with increased risks of morbidity. We aimed to determine the radiograph factors that resulted in diagnostic interpretation challenges for emergency physicians reviewing pediatric MSK radiographs.

Emergency physicians provided diagnostic interpretations on 1,850 pediatric MSK radiographs via their participation in a web-based education platform. From this data, we derived interpretation difficulty scores for each radiograph using item response theory. We classified each radiograph by body region, diagnosis (fracture/dislocation absent or present), and, where applicable, the specific fracture location(s) and morphology(ies). We compared the interpretation difficulty scores by diagnosis, fracture location, and morphology. An expert panel reviewed the 65 most commonly misdiagnosed radiographs without a fracture/dislocation to identify normal imaging findings that were commonly mistaken for fractures.

We included data from 244 emergency physicians, which resulted in 185,653 unique radiograph interpretations, 42,689 (23.0%) of which were diagnostic errors. For humerus, elbow, forearm, wrist, femur, knee, tibia-fibula radiographs, those without a fracture had higher interpretation difficulty scores relative to those with a fracture; the opposite was true for the hand, pelvis, foot, and ankle radiographs (p < 0 .004 for all comparisons). The descriptive review demonstrated that specific normal anatomy, overlapping bones, and external artefact from muscle or skin folds were often mistaken for fractures. There was a significant difference in difficulty score by anatomic locations of the fracture in the elbow, pelvis, and ankle (p < 0 .004 for all comparisons). Ankle and elbow growth plate, fibular avulsion, and humerus condylar were more difficult to diagnose than other fracture patterns (p < 0 .004 for all comparisons).

We identified actionable learning opportunities in paediatric MSK radiograph interpretation for emergency physicians. We will use this information to design targeted education to referring emergency physicians and their trainees with an aim to decrease delayed and missed paediatric MSK injuries.

Diagnostic interpretation error of paediatric musculoskeletal (MSK) radiographs can lead to late presentation of injuries that subsequently require more invasive surgical interventions with increased risks of morbidity. We aimed to determine the radiograph factors that resulted in diagnostic interpretation challenges for emergency physicians reviewing pediatric MSK radiographs.

Emergency physicians provided diagnostic interpretations on 1,850 pediatric MSK radiographs via their participation in a web-based education platform. From this data, we derived interpretation difficulty scores for each radiograph using item response theory. We classified each radiograph by body region, diagnosis (fracture/dislocation absent or present), and, where applicable, the specific fracture location(s) and morphology(ies). We compared the interpretation difficulty scores by diagnosis, fracture location, and morphology. An expert panel reviewed the 65 most commonly misdiagnosed radiographs without a fracture/dislocation to identify normal imaging findings that were commonly mistaken for fractures.

We included data from 244 emergency physicians, which resulted in 185,653 unique radiograph interpretations, 42,689 (23.0%) of which were diagnostic errors. For humerus, elbow, forearm, wrist, femur, knee, tibia-fibula radiographs, those without a fracture had higher interpretation difficulty scores relative to those with a fracture; the opposite was true for the hand, pelvis, foot, and ankle radiographs (p < 0 .004 for all comparisons). The descriptive review demonstrated that specific normal anatomy, overlapping bones, and external artefact from muscle or skin folds were often mistaken for fractures. There was a significant difference in difficulty score by anatomic locations of the fracture in the elbow, pelvis, and ankle (p < 0 .004 for all comparisons). Ankle and elbow growth plate, fibular avulsion, and humerus condylar were more difficult to diagnose than other fracture patterns (p < 0 .004 for all comparisons).

We identified actionable learning opportunities in paediatric MSK radiograph interpretation for emergency physicians. We will use this information to design targeted education to referring emergency physicians and their trainees with an aim to decrease delayed and missed paediatric MSK injuries.

INTRODUCTION. Despite our best efforts, orthopaedic surgeons do not always achieve desired results in acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. New advancements in digital radiography and image analysis software allow contemporaneous assessment of cup position in real-time during the surgical procedure. The purpose of this study was to describe and validate a technique in obtaining a true AP Pelvis radiograph in the lateral decubitus position to accurately assess cup position intra-operatively (Figure 1). METHODS. 350 consecutive patients undergoing THA through a soft-tissue sparing posterior approach were prospectively enrolled. Standard pre-operative supine radiographs were taken in the office to serve as a reference for intra-operative pelvic orientation and templating. Intra-operative AP Pelvis radiographs were obtained with the patient in the lateral decubitus position to appropriately match the pre-operative radiograph. Adjustments were made to correct for pelvic rotation by rotating the operating room table forward or backward. Radiographic beam angle adjustments allowed the surgeon to match pre-operative and intra-operative pelvic tilt (Figure 2). Two independent observers measured cup abduction angle. RESULTS. 95% of cups were placed within 30–50 degrees of abduction, with a mean angle of 38 degrees (STD +/− 5). 100% of cups measured post-operatively were placed within 3 degrees of their intra-operative measurement. Mean anteversion was 27.5 degrees (STD +/− 3.5). Intra-operative radiographs were repeated in 88% of cases in order to match to the pre-operative radiographs. The cup was repositioned in 28% of cases based on intra-operative measurements. Impingement during range of motion testing occurred in 3% of cases despite acceptable measurements, necessitating cup reposition. The intercross correlation coefficient between the two observers was 0.92. There was one dislocation reported in the 2-year follow-up. Changes in the pelvic inlet and outlet orientation changed the abduction angle measurement in a predictable way. We developed a formula and 3D model to predict the abudction angle based on the pelvic tilt, where a more outlet view would increase the abduction angle measurement (Figure 3). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. Advancements in digital radiography allow for real-time cup position assessment, creating the opportunity for the surgeon to make the appropriate changes and confirm precise placement during the procedure. For figures/tables, please contact authors directly.

Accurate measurement of pelvic tilt (PT) is critical in diagnosing hip and spine pathologies. Yet a sagittal pelvic radiograph with good quality is not always available. Studies explored the correlation between PT and sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle from anteroposterior (AP) radiographs yet demonstrated conflicting conclusions about its feasibilities. This study aims to perform a cohort-controlled meta-analysis to examine the correlation between the SFP angle and PT and proposes an application range of the method.

This study searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for studies that evaluated the correlation between SFP angle and PT. The Pearson's correlation coefficient r from studies were tabulated and compared. Pooled r for overall and gender/age (teenage or adult) controlled subgroup were reported using Fisher's Z transformation. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated using Egger's regression test for the funnel plot asymmetry.

Eleven studies were recruited, with nine reported r (totalling 1,247 patients). The overall pooled r was 0.61 with high inter-study heterogeneity (I2 = 75.95%). Subgroup analysis showed that the adult group had a higher r than the teenage group (0.70 versus 0.56, p < 0.001). Although statistically insignificant (p = 0.062), the female group showed a higher r than the male group (0.72 versus 0.65).

The SFP method must be used with caution and should not be used in the male teenage group. The current studies did not demonstrate that the SFP method was superior to other AP landmarks correlating to PT. Identical heterogeneity was observed among studies, indicating that more ethnicity-segregated and gender-specific subgroup studies might be necessary. More data input analysing the errors will be useful.

Fluoroscopic C-arms are operated by medical radiography technologists (RTs) in Canadian operating rooms (ORs). While they do receive formal, accredited training, most of it is theoretical, rather than hands-on. During their first encounters in the OR, new RTs can experience difficulty achieving the radiographic views required by surgeons, often needing several scout X-rays during C-arm positioning. Furthermore, ambiguous language by surgeons often inadequately conveys their request. The result is often frustration, unnecessary radiation exposure, and added OR time. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of artificial X-rays in improving C-arm positioning performance, with inexperienced C-arm users. We developed an Artificial X-ray Imaging System (AXIS) that generates Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs (DRRs), or artificial X-ray images, based on the relative position of a C-arm and manikin. 30 participants were enrolled in the user study and performed four activities: an introduction session, an AXIS-guided evaluation, a non-AXIS-guided evaluation, and a questionnaire. The main goal of the study was to assess C-arm positioning performance with and without AXIS guidance. For each evaluation, the participants had to replicate a set of target X-ray images by taking real radiographs of the manikin with the C-arm. During the AXIS evaluation, artificial X-rays were generated at 2 Hz for guidance, while in the non-AXIS evaluation, the participants had to acquire real scout X-rays to guide them toward the correct view. For each imaging task the number of real X-rays and time required per task was recorded, and the C-arm's pose was tracked and compared to the target pose to determine positioning accuracy; these were averaged for each participant and condition. Hypothesis testing on the means and paired t-tests were carried out using a significance level of α=0.05. On average, users took significantly fewer real scout X-ray images (53% fewer (2.8 vs 6.0), p<0.001) when guided by AXIS. Lateral distance accuracy was improved by 10% for final C- arm positions and by 26% for the most accurate intermediate C-arm positions when guided by AXIS (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in average task time or angular accuracies between the AXIS and non-AXIS evaluations. Overall, we are encouraged by these findings and plan to further develop this system with the goal of deploying it both for training and intraoperative uses

Acetabular component orientation can directly influence dislocation rates, polyethylene wear, and revision rates. Precise placement has been found to occur in only 38–47% after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The recent introduction of digital radiography (DR) has enabled a paradigm shift in intra-operative imaging technology. Rather than deal with the cumbersome process of chemical image processing we can now acquire a high quality digital image in a matter of seconds. The functionality approaches that of fluoroscopy, or even a C-arm, however, a digital system can operate with lower radiation, higher resolution, and perhaps most importantly a larger field of view. These features make it very suitable for use during surgery. The purpose of this presentation is to illustrate the current intra-operative technique and share the overwhelmingly positive experience gathered over the past five years. Traditional THA employs use of post-operative radiography for “outcome assessment.” This unfortunately does not allow the surgeon to evaluate the relevant parameters and make necessary adjustments without returning to the operating room. Digital imaging, however, permits intra-operative guidance and “outcome control.” It provides an immediate and complete preview of what the post-operative film will show. There is now an opportunity to optimise component orientation, sizing, apposition, screw position, limb length, and offset, before leaving the operating room. This can be done with minimal intrusion on normal workflow, adding only a few minutes of operating time

Identifying and restoring alignment is a primary aim of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In the coronal plane, the pre-pathological hip knee angle can be predicted using an arithmetic method (aHKA) by measuring the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (aHKA=MPTA - LDFA). The aHKA is shown to be predictive of coronal alignment prior to the onset of osteoarthritis; a useful guide when considering a non-mechanically aligned TKA. The aim of this study is to investigate the intra- and inter-observer accuracy of aHKA measurements on long leg standing radiographs (LLR) and preoperative Mako CT planning scans (CTs).

Sixty-eight patients who underwent TKA from 2020–2021 with pre-operative LLR and CTs were included. Three observers (Surgeon, Fellow, Registrar) measured the LDFA and MPTA on LLR and CT independently on three separate occasions, to determine aHKA. Statistical analysis was undertaken with Bland-Altman test and coefficient of repeatability.

An average intra-observer measurement error of 3.5° on LLR and 1.73° on CTs for MPTA was detected. Inter-observer errors were 2.74° on LLR and 1.28° on CTs. For LDFA, average intra-observer measurement error was 2.93° on LLR and 2.3° on CTs, with inter-observer errors of 2.31° on LLR and 1.92° on CTs. Average aHKA intra-observer error was 4.8° on LLR and 2.82° on CTs. Inter-observer error of 3.56° for LLR and 2.0° on CTs was measured.

The aHKA is reproducible on both LLR and CT. CT measurements are more reproducible both between and within observers. The difference between measurements using LLR and CT is small and hence these two can be considered interchangeable. CT may obviate the need for LLRs and may overcome difficulties associated with positioning, rotation, body habitus and flexion contractures when assessing coronal alignment.

Despite our best efforts, orthopaedic surgeons do not always achieve desired results in acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although ideal abduction and anteversion angles vary depending on surgeon preference, patient factors and anatomy, studies have shown that improperly positioned cups lead to increased failure rates in THA. While there have been many technological advancements in THA, including using CT-guided and fluoroscopic techniques, the cost for the hospital and time required to use this technology sometimes force hospitals not to use them. New advancements in digital radiography and image analysis software allow contemporaneous assessment of cup position in real-time during the surgical procedure. Intra-operative, or “trial radiographs” with the patient in lateral decubitus position can be digitally manipulated to match pre-operative radiographs obtained with patients in the supine position to enable calculation of the abduction and anteversion angle in these patients. In our single surgeon experience, digital radiography takes approximately 4–6 seconds in order to obtain an AP pelvic radiograph. The use of the software to measure the cup position adds only 1–2 minutes to the operative time and minimises interference with workflow. The adjustments that can be made intra-operatively with this technology allow the surgeon to learn what factors in his surgical approach and technique are useful in achieving the desired component position. This allows the surgeon to have precise control over the cup position during the operation rather than experience disappointment and frustration while viewing the post-operative film. This cost-effective and efficient tool allows the surgeons to achieve the best results for their patients in real time without having to leave the operating room

Bone ingrowth fixation of large diameter, beaded cobalt chromium cups is generally considered to be reliable but this is typically judged radiographically. To date, implant retrieval data of attached bone has been limited. This study evaluated correlations between the pre-revision radiographic appearance and the measured amount of bone attachment on one design of porous coated cup. Methods. Twenty-six monoblock, CoCr Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR, Smith and Nephew, TN, USA) cups with macroscopic beads and hydroxyapatite coating were studied. Seventeen were revised for acetabular malposition with the remainder revised for femoral loosening (4), pain (1), infection (1), dislocation (1) or lysis (2). Median time to revision was 35 months (10 – 70 months). Ten patients were female; the median age of all patients was 54 years. The pre-revision radiographs were visually ranked for cup-bone integration as follows: 0 = none, 1 = < 50%, 2 = 50 – 75%, 3 = 76 – 95%, 4 = > 96% integration. Rankings were made for the superior and inferior aspects, without knowledge of the appearance of bone on the retrievals. The revised cups were photographed at an angle so the dome and the cup periphery were visualized. The area of bone in four equal segments in each of the superior and inferior aspects was measured with image analysis software. A probe was used to differentiate bone from soft tissue. Only bone that covered the beads was counted. Correlation coefficients were calculated for the radiographic and image analysis data. Results. Radiographically, most cups were assessed as having more than 50% of bone attachment and 7 cups were ranked as having almost total integration with bone. Only 2 cups were assessed radiographically as fully loose. Measured total bone attachment ranged from none to 55%. Superior and inferior percent ingrowth were highly correlated (corr=0.68, p<0.001) but there was no correlation between percent bone and x-ray rank (inferior corr=0.01, p=0.96; superior corr=0.23, p=0.26). There was no correlation between cup malpositioning as a reason for revision and x-ray integration ranking (superior p=0.34; inferior p=0.80). Discussion. Despite the radiographic appearance of good fixation, there was little or no correlation between percent area of actual bone attachment and x-ray appearance. One study limitation is the assumption that attached bone was indeed integrated with the beads as destructive sectioning was not done to verify this. Published autopsy retrieval studies have shown that even a small amount of actual ingrowth can provide clinically successful fixation. Another possible limitation was the variable quality of the radiographs. Never-the-less these results raise questions about the accuracy of radiographic analysis of bone fixation. The possibility that inadequate fixation is a cause for pain leading to revision should be considered even when the radiographic appearance indicates otherwise

Introduction

Low dose technology of an EOS scanner allows mechanical axis radiographs to be produced using a continuously moving x-ray emitting a thin beam to form a single image which includes all three joints, without the need for stitching. The aim of this study was to identify necessary improvements to enable effective interpretation of the radiographs, and to assess whether the quality of the radiographs varied by production method compared to a previous audit of CR and DR radiographs.

Introduction. In prosthetic knee surgery, the axis of the lower limb is often determined only by static radiographic analysis. However, it is relevant to determine if this axis varies during walking, as this may alter the stresses on the implants. The aim of this study was to determine whether pre-operative measurement of the mechanical femorotibial axis (mFTA) varies between static and dynamic analysis in isolated medial femorotibial osteoarthritis. Methods. Twenty patients scheduled for robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) were included in this prospective study. We compared three measurements of the coronal femorotibial axis: in a static and weightbearing position (on long leg radiographs), in a dynamic but non-weightbearing position (intra-operative acquisition during robotic-assisted UKA), and in a dynamic and weightbearing position (during walking by a gait analysis). Results. There was no significant difference in the mFTA between radiological (173.9 ± 3.3°), robotic (174.4 ± 3.4°), and gait analysis (172.9 ± 5.1°) measurements (p < 0.05). Conclusion. There is no significant variation in varus between lying, standing, and while walking in patients who are candidates for medial UKA. This study also allows us to validate the accuracy of the robotic system in varus estimation, and to rely on intra-operative planning as it also reflects the dynamic knee under load

The recent introduction of digital radiography has enabled a paradigm shift in intra-operative imaging technology. Rather than deal with the cumbersome process of chemical image processing we can now acquire a high quality digital image in a matter of seconds. The functionality approaches that of fluoroscopy, or even a C-arm, however, a digital system can operate with lower radiation, higher resolution, and perhaps most importantly a larger field of view. These features and the greater ability for post-acquisition, digital image enhancement make it very suitable for use during surgery. The purpose of this presentation is to illustrate the intra-operative technique and share the overwhelmingly positive experience gathered over the past few years. The current paradigm in total hip arthroplasty (THA) employs use of post-operative radiography for “outcome assessment.” This unfortunately does not allow the surgeon to evaluate the relevant parameters and make necessary adjustments without returning to the operating room. The new paradigm, however, permits intra-operative guidance and “outcome control.” We now have an opportunity to add a “trial radiograph” to our practice of performing a trial reduction. This provides an immediate and complete preview of what the post-operative film will show. There is now an opportunity, during the course of any hip arthroplasty, to optimise component orientation, sizing, apposition, screw position, limb length, and offset, before leaving the operating room. This can be done with minimal intrusion on normal workflow, adding only a few minutes of operating time

Two critical steps in achieving optimal results and minimizing complications (dislocation, lengthening, and intra-operative fracture) are careful pre-operative planning and more recently, the option of intra-operative imaging in order to optimise accurate and reproducible total hip replacement. The important issues to ascertain are relative limb length, offset and center of rotation. It is important to start the case knowing the patient's perception of their limb length. Patient perception is equally important, if not more important, than the radiographic assessment. On the acetabular side, the teardrop should be identified and the amount of reaming necessary to place the inferior margin of the acetabular component adjacent to the tear drop should be noted. Superiorly the amount of exposed metal that is expected to be seen during surgery should be measured in millimeters. Once the key issues of limb length, offset, center of rotation, and acetabular component position relative to the native acetabulum have been confirmed along with the expected sizing of the acetabular and femoral components, it is critical that the operative plan is reproduced at the time of surgery and this can best be consistently performed with the use of intra-operative imaging. Advances in digital imaging now make efficient, cost-effective assessment of hip replacement possible. Embedded software allows accurate confirmation of the pre-operative plan intra-operatively when correction of potential errors is easily possible. Such technology is now mature after years of clinical use and studies have confirmed its success in avoiding outliers and achieving optimal results

Introduction. Alumina-on-alumina bearings exhibit low wear rates in vitro and one commonly used ceramic implant is the Trident system (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ). There are some reports of incomplete seating of the ceramic liner in the Trident acetabular shell. However, it is often difficult to detect incomplete seating intraoperatively. We sought to prevent incomplete seating using intraoperative radiography. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 19 hips in 17 patients who had undergone primary total hip arthroplasty using a Trident shell with a metal-backed alumina liner between 2007 and 2010. There were 16 women and 1 man, with an average age of 45.7 years. Preoperative diagnosis revealed 14 cases of osteoarthritis and 5 cases of osteonecrosis. All procedures were performed using a posterolateral approach with PSL cups. The minimum follow-up time was 12 months (average 28 months). All procedures included an intraoperative anteroposterior view radiograph to evaluate cup seating. If incomplete seating was recognized we reinserted the liner. Postoperatively, radiographs (supine anteroposterior and cross table lateral views) and computed tomography were performed in all cases in order to assess any residual incomplete seating. We investigated whether it was possible to avoid incomplete seating using intraoperative radiography. Results. Six (32%)of 19 hips had evidence of incomplete seating. Of these, 3 revealed incomplete seating on intraoperative radiography, 2 were reinserted adequately, and the liner was replaced with a polyethylene liner in one case. Postoperative radiography revealed incomplete seating in 3 cases. One hip had become correctly seated as shown by follow-up radiography at 3 months and the other hips remained incompletely seated for the follow up period. The location of the gap between the socket and liner caused by incomplete seating was inferomedial in all cases, as seen on the intraoperative anteroposterior view radiographs. We were able to avoid incomplete seating in all of these cases except for one, which was missing the gap. Cases in which the location of the gap was anterior could not be diagnosed by intraoperative radiographs, and were diagnosed postoperatively. Incomplete seating was seen in 3 of 9 cases that used a 2.8 mm shell thickness, and in 3 of 10 cases that used a 3.8 mm thickness. No case had complete dislocation or failure of the ceramic liner. There were no revision surgeries. Discussions. Although there have been no published case reports regarding complete dislocation or failure of the ceramic liner caused by incomplete seating, adverse influences that are caused by incomplete seating remain uncertain. Some reports describe that incomplete seating was potentially attributed to poor exposure, bony and soft tissue impingement, and cup deformity. The attempt to avoid incomplete seating using intraoperative radiography was effective in cases where medial or lateral gaps were seen. However, it was ineffective in cases where gaps were anterior or posterior. Trident system ceramic liners need to be used with care to avoid incomplete seating