Introduction. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is becoming an increasingly popular option in single compartment osteoarthritis. As a result, diverse re-operations including revisions to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has also increase. The objective of this study is to investigate the distribution of causes of re-operations after UKA and to analyze the types of re-operations. Method. We retrospectively reviewed 691 UKAs performed on 595 patients between January 2003 and December 2011. Except in one case, all UKAs were performed for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. The UKAs were performed in 487 (81.8%) women and 108 (18.2%) men. The mean age at the time of UKA was 61.5 years (47 to 88 years). Mobile-bearing designs were implanted in 627 (90.7%) knees (626- Oxford knee and 1- Scorpio knee) and fixed designs were implanted in 64 (9.3%) knees (42- Tornier and 18- Zimmer). The mean interval between UKA and second operation was 15.4 months (10 days to 10 years) and between second and third operation was 7.7 months (5 weeks to 17 months). In the re-operation group, there were 50 knees (48 patients) with 38 female and 10 male patients. Results. In our study, the burden of a re-operation after the initial UKA was 8.7%with, the total number of re-operation of 60. There was 50 cases of second operations (n = 45 mobile, n = 5 fixed), and 10 cases of second re-operation. The most common cause of a second re- operation after a mobile-bearing UKA was the dislocation of the meniscal bearing (32%), followed by component loosening (20%), the formation of a cement loose body (14%), unexplained pain (12%), infection (6%), periprosthetic fracture (4%), and others (2%). For the fixed-bearing UKA, the causes of a second operation were loosening (4%), unexplained pain (4%), and bearing wear (2%). 10 cases required a 3rd operation at mean time interval of 7.7 months, of them 7 cases (70%) had liner exchange at their 2nd operation. Discussion and conclusion. The most common cause of a second re-operation after a mobile-bearing UKA was the dislocation of the bearing, followed by component loosening and the formation of a cement loose body. After a fixed-bearing UKA, component loosening and unexplained pain were the most common causes of re-operation. In cases which underwent a third operation, 70 percent had liner exchange with or without some minor procedure at the time of the 2ndoperation. All were converted to TKA at their 3rd operation at a mean time interval of only 7.7 months. Based on our observations, we recommend a cause-based approach to the management of primary and failed UKA to help minimize the possibility of second and third operations. Furthermore caution should be undertaken when contemplating liner exchange as treatment option in cases involving mobile-bearing UKA

Purpose. Factors that contribute to early and late re-operation after cruciate reconstruction (CR) have not been evaluated on a population level in a public health system. After surgery patients are at risk for knee stiffness, infection or early graft failure prompting revision. Long-term, ipsilateral revision CR, contralateral CR and potentially even joint replacement may occur. Population research in total joint replacement surgery has demonstrated an inverse relationship between complication/failure rates and surgeon procedural volume. We hypothesized that in Ontario, younger patient age and lower surgeon volume would increase the risk of short and long-term re-operation after CR. Method. Billing, procedural and diagnostic coding from administrative databases (Ontario Health Insurance Plan, Canadian Institutes of Health Research) were accessed through the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences to develop the cohort of all Ontario residents aged 14 to 60 who underwent anterior or posterior CR from July 1992 to April 2008. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratio for patient (age, gender, comorbidity, income, concurrent knee surgery) and provider (surgeon volume, teaching hospital status) factors for having a surgical washout of the knee, manipulation for stiffness or repeat of the index event within six months. A cox proportional hazards survivorship model was used to calculate the hazard ratio of the same covariates for repeat CR and partial/total knee arthroplasty from inception until end of 2009. Results. The cohort identified 34,735 CR patients with a median age 28 yrs (IQR 20–36) and 65% male. Re-operation for infection was 0.2% and stiffness 0.5%. The long-term rate of any repeat CR was 7.7% after a mean 4.23.4 years. Female gender (OR=2.8, p<0.0001), overnight hospital stay (OR=2.1, p=0.0005), meniscal repair with CR (OR=1.9, p=0.008) and surgeon volume of 0–12 CR/yr (OR=4.0, p=0.0006), significantly increased the odds of re-operation for stiffness. The odds of re-operation for infection were significantly increased for surgeons performing 0–12 CR/yr (OR=3.8, p=0.007), and for CR performed at a teaching hospital (OR=2.3, p=0.002). Repeat CR was not influenced by surgeon volume at any time-point. Survival analysis demonstrated a long-term repeat CR rate of 13% (HR=1.8, p<0.0001) for age 14–19 yrs compared to the mean cohort age. Late partial or total knee replacement occurred in 0.75% of patients, with increased risk found for patients >30 years (HR=2.5, p=0.002), or who had concurrent surgery for an osteochondral lesion at the index CR (HR=2.3, p=0.001). Conclusion. Although this data is limited by the ability to distinguish between anterior or posterior and revision or contralateral CR, we have demonstrated that lower volume surgeons have higher complication rates (stiffness, infection) after CR surgery. We have also identified at-risk groups, such as females for stiffness post-CR and osteochondral injury + CR for eventual knee replacement

Reoperations may be a better way of tracking adverse outcomes than complications. Repeat surgery causes cost to the system, and often indicate failure of the primary procedure resulting in the patient not achieving the expected improvement in pain and function. Understanding the cause of repeat surgery at the primary site may result in design improvements to implants or improvements to fusion techniques resulting in better outcomes in the future. The COFAS group have designed a reoperation classification system. The purpose of this study was to outline the inter and intra observer reliability of this classification scheme.

To verify the inter- and intra-observer reliability of this new coding system, six fellow ship trained practicing foot and ankle Orthopaedic surgeons were asked to classify 62 repeat surgeries from a single surgeons practice. The six surgeons read the operation reports in random order, and reread the reports 2 weeks later in a different order. Reliability was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and proportions of agreement. The agreement between pairs of readings (915 for inter observer for the first and second read – 61 readings with 15 comparisons, observer 1 with observer 2, observer 1 with observer 3, etc) was determined by seeing how often each observer agreed. This was repeated for the 366 ratings for intra observer readings (61 times 6).

The inter-observer reliability on the first read had a mean intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.89. The range for the 15 comparisons was 0.81 to 1.0. Amongst all 1830 paired codings between two observers, 1605 (88%) were in agreement. Across the 61 cases, 45 (74%) were given the same code by all six observers. However, the difference when present was larger with more observers not agreeing. The inter-observer reliability test on the second read had a mean ICC of 0.94, with a range of 0.90. There were 43 (72%) observations that were the same across all six observers. Of all pairs (915 in total) there was agreement in 804 pairs for the first reading (88%) and disagreement in 111 (12%). For the second reading there was agreement in 801 pairs (86%) and disagreement in 114 (14%). The intra-observer reliability averaged an ICC value of 0.92, with a range of 0.86 to 0.98. The observers agreed with their own previous observations 324 times out of 366 paired readings (89% agreement of pairs).

The COFAS classification of reoperations for end stage ankle arthritis was reliable. This scheme potentially could be applied to other areas of Orthopaedic surgery and should replace the Claiden Dindo modifications that do not accurately reflect Orthopaedic outcomes. As complications are hard to define and lack consistent terminology reoperations and resource utilisation (extra clinic visits, extra days in hospital and extra hours of surgery) may be more reliable measures of the negative effects of surgery.

Osteolysis is one of a major cause of failure that affect long term survival rate in THA. Hard-on-hard bearing surface were developed to reduce wear and osteolysis, such as ceramic-on-ceramic which is the lowest wear rate was introduced but it still has squeaking and ceramic fracture. Metal-on-metal bearing surface significantly reduce wear rate but it still release metal ion which affect local tissue reaction. Then ceramic-on-metal is another choice of bearing with combine the advantage of reduce wear rate, metal ion release, no stripe wear, no squeaking and no ceramic fracture. However after clinical use ALTRs may occur and disturb the longevity of THA.

During January 2009 to December 2009 we performed 98 THR with the same femoral stem and acetabular cup with difference bearing which were 87 cases of metal on cross-linked PE, 8 cases of ceramic on metal and 5 cases of metal on metal. Routinely postoperative care were done with clinical evaluation, plain x-rays and Harris hip score. After 5 years follow up there are clinical problems in ceramic on metal THA with decrease clinical score and progressive osteolysis in radiographic finding in 2 cases then we investigated to find the cause of this problem and revise the components. We preformed magnetic resonance imaging and collect blood sample for ESR, CRP and Cobalt and Chromium level. We revised 2 cases of ceramic on metal THA, during surgery we collected tissue for bacterial and AFB and histopathology. All retrieval components were studied for wear pattern. First patient have thigh pain and progressive osteolysis after year 4^th of follow up. She had normal ESR and CRP with high level of cobalt and chromium level. We revised both components and tissue histopathology showed metallosis with chronic inflammation. Another patient had failure due to ALTRs with mixed solid-cystic mass at trochanteric bursa but component is stable then only bearing surface were change. Wear pattern at femoral head was in weight bearing area with corresponding to apical center wear of metal liner.

Our study showed that only in group of ceramic-on-metal THA that have 5 years follow up have early reoperation due to osteolysis and tissue reaction. We routinely stop to use this bearing since 2010. But we have small number of cases in our study to conclude that is bearing are not suitable for clinical usage.

A retrospective review was conducted of patients undergoing either total hip replacement or hemiarthroplasty for intra-capsular neck of femur fractures between April 2013 and April 2014; identified from entries into the National Hip Fracture Database. PACS and the electronic database encompassing operation notes and discharge summaries were reviewed. 309 patients were identified, 3 of whom fractured both hips during the study period giving a total of 312 operations. The age range was 46 to 102 with a mean age of 82. 59 cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasties, 143 cemented unipolar hemiarthroplasties, 2 uncemented hemiarthroplasties and 108 total hip replacements were performed. 10 patients required further operations. There have been 5 dislocations: 2 underwent MUA only, 2 treated by excision arthroplasty and 1 converted to THR. 1 patient developed a haematoma requiring wound washout. There were 4 wound infections - 1 treated by a washout, 2 by excision arthroplasty and one patient has undergone first stage revision; an overall reoperation rate of 3.2% comparing well with data published elsewhere.

Purpose

Open reduction and plate fixation of displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures has gained significant popularity following a recent multi-center randomized control trial. The purpose of this study is to describe the incidence of reoperation following plate fixation of displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures. The secondary objective is to determine if plate design influences the incidence of reoperation.

Introduction. Distal femur fracture fixation in elderly presents significant challenges due to osteoporosis and associated comorbidities. There has been an evolution in the management of these fractures with a description of various surgical techniques and fixation methods; however, currently, there is no consensus on the standard of care. Non-union rates of up to 19% and mortality rates of up to 26 % at one year have been reported in the literature. Delay in surgery and delay in mobilisation post-operatively have been identified as two main factors for high rate of mortality. As biomechanical studies have proved better stability with dual plating or nail-plate combination, a trend has been shifting for past few years towards rigid fixation to allow early mobilisation. Our study aims to compare outcomes of distal femur fractures managed with either single plate (SP), dual plating (DP) or nail-plate construct (NP). Methods. A retrospective review of patients aged above 65 years with distal femur fractures (both native and peri-prosthetic) who underwent surgical management between June 2020 and May 2023 was conducted. Patients were divided into three groups based on mode of fixation - single plate or dual plating or nail-plate construct. AO/OTA classification was used for non-periprosthetic, and Unified classification system (UCS) was used for periprosthetic fractures. Data on patient demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical details, postoperative complications, re-operation rate, radiological outcomes and mortality rate were evaluated. Primary objective was to compare re-operation rate and mortality rate between 3 groups at 30 days, 6 months and at 1 year. Results. A cohort of 32 patients with distal femur fractures were included in this study. 91% were females and mean age was 80.97 (range 68–97). 18 (53%) were non-periprosthetic fracture and 14 (47%) were periprosthetic fractures.18 patients underwent single plate fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 8, 33B/C – 2, UCS V3B – 5, V3C – 3),10 patients had dual plate fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 1, 33B/C – 4, UCS V3B – 3, V3C – 2) and 4 patients underwent nail-plate combination fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 4). 70.5% patients had surgery within 36 hours of admission and 90% within 48 hours. Analysis showed no re-operation at 30 days, 6 months in all 3 groups. At 1 year one patient had re-operation in dual-plating periprosthetic group (Distal femur replacement done for failed fixation). Three patients (16%) in single plate group had re-operation at 2 years (2 for peri-implant fracture and 1 for infection). None of the patients treated with Nail-plate combination had re-operation. Mortality rate at 30 days was 0% in among all the 3 groups. At 6 months, it was 16% in single plate group and 0% in DP and NP groups at 6 months and at 1 year mortality rate was 27% in SP group, 10% in DP and 0% in NP group. Combined mortality rate was 0% at 30 days, 9% at 6 months and 18.7% at one year. Conclusion. Our analysis provides insights into fixation methods of distal femur fractures in elderly patients. We conclude that a lower re-operation rate and mortality rate can be achieved with early surgery and rigid fixation with either dual plating or nail-plate construct to allow early mobilisation. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and guide the selection of optimal surgical strategies for these challenging fractures

Introduction. Lower limb amputation is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Reflecting the predominance of vascular or diabetic disease as a cause for lower limb amputation, much of the available literature excludes lower limb amputation secondary to trauma in the reporting of complication rates. This paucity in the literature represents a research gap in describing the incidence of complications in lower limb amputation due to trauma, which we aim to address. Materials and Methods. Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of all traumatic lower limb amputations secondary to trauma from a regional multidisciplinary amputee service at Queen Mary's Hospital. Electronic patient records and paper notes were consulted for evidence of re-operation, infection (superficial or deep), phantom limb pain and neuroma. 222 patients were screened and 108 included in the data analysis. Results. Records identified 108 lower limb amputations secondary to trauma in 99 patients with a mean age of 34 years (at time of amputation). Average follow-up was 225 months. 33.6% of patients underwent re-operation, 25.2% had at least one episode of infection. Of those who underwent re-operation, 47.2% had evidence of infection. 42% and 3.7% of patients described phantom limb pain and neuroma respectively. Conclusions. Lower limb amputations secondary to trauma exhibit higher rates of re-operation and infection compared to vascular or diabetic amputees. This first study to provide high quality data describing the incidence of complications such as re-operation, infection, phantom limb pain and neuroma in lower limb amputations secondary to trauma

Source of the study: University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has benefits for patients with appropriate indications. However, UKA has a higher risk of revision, particularly for low-usage surgeons. The introduction of robotic-arm assisted systems may allow for improved outcomes but is also associated with a learning curve. We aimed to characterise the learning curve of a robotic-arm assisted system (MAKO) for UKA in terms of operative time, limb alignment, component sizing, and patient outcomes. Operative times, pre- and post-surgical limb alignments, and component sizing were prospectively recorded for consecutive cases of primary medial UKA between 2017 and 2021 (n=152, 5 surgeons). Patient outcomes were captured with the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) and re-operation events up to two years post-UKA. A Cumulative Summation (CUSUM) method was used to estimate learning curves and to distinguish between learning and proficiency phases. Introduction of the system had a learning curve of 11 cases. There was increased operative time of 13 minutes between learning and proficiency phases (learning 98 mins vs. proficiency 85 mins; p<0.001), associated with navigation registration and bone preparation/cutting. A learning curve was also found with polyethylene insert sizing (p=0.03). No difference in patient outcomes between the two phases were detected for patient-reported outcome measures, implant survival (both phases 98%; NS) or re-operation (learning 100% vs. proficiency: 96%; NS). Implant survival and re-operation rates did not differ between low and high usage surgeons (cut-off of 12 UKAs per year). Introduction of the robotic-arm assisted system for UKA led to increased operative times for navigation registration and bone preparation, but no differences were detected in terms of component placement or patient outcomes regardless of usage. The short learning curve regardless of UKA usage indicated that robotic-arm assisted UKA may be particularly useful for low-usage surgeons

The aim of the this study was to determine the effect of the knee flexion angle (KFA) during tibial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft fixation on patient reported outcomes, graft stability, extension loss and re-operation following anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction. All 169 included patients (mean age 28.5 years, 65% male) were treated with anatomic single bundle ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft and randomized to tibial fixation of the ACL graft at either 0o (n=85) or 30o (n=84). The primary outcome was the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) two years following surgery. Secondary outcomes were the Marx Activity Scale (MAS), the rate of re-operation, and physical exam findings at one year including KT-1000 and side to side differences in knee extension. The follow-up rate was 82% (n=139) for the primary outcome. Graft failure rate at two years was 1% (n=2, 1 per group). ACL tibial graft fixation at 0o or 30o did not have a significant effect on KOOS scores at two years following ACLR. Patients whose graft was fixed at a knee flexion angle of 0o had greater scores on the Marx Activity Scale (mean 9.6 [95%CI 8.5-10.6] versus 8.0 [95%CI 6.9-9.1, p=0.04) and a greater proportion of patients who achieved the minimal clinical important difference (MCID) for the KOOS pain subscale (94% vs 81%, p=0.04). There was no significant difference in knee extension loss, KT-1000 measurements or re-operation between the two groups. In the setting of anatomic single-bundle ACLR using patellar tendon autograft and anteromedial portal femoral drilling, there was no difference in KOOS scores among patients fixed at 0o and 30o. Patient fixed in full extension did demonstrate higher activity scores at 2 years following surgery and a greater likelihood of achieving the MCID for KOOS pain

Introduction. Osseointegration has emerged as a promising alternative to rehabilitating with a traditional socket mounted prosthesis. Advantages have been reported to include improved functional mobility, better osseoperception, improved comfort, reduced pain, better biomechanical alignment and better gait, which all lead to a less restricted lifestyle and significantly improved quality of life. A major concern of the Osseointegrated approach lies in the risk of infections occurring from the permanent transcutaneous opening often referred to as the stoma. Several systematic reviews have indicated that the occurrence of minor infections can be quite common, serious complications are reported to be rare. In addition to commonly anticipated complications including fractures, surgical debridements or revisions, we have identified several significant events in which a patient may require to be readmitted and go through additional surgery. The objective of this study is to examine the rate of occurrence and reports on the best management practices of serious complications across a multi-centre review of more than 1000 osseointegration surgeries. Materials & Methods. A detailed analysis has been performed on all osseointegration surgeries performed by the Osseointegration Group of Australia and it's affiliates between since 2010. The majority of surgeries took place in Australia, the United States, the Middle East as well as in Europe. All events leading to a re-admission and subsequent re-operation have been identified through hospital operation records and pooled together for meta-analysis. Events identified include: revision of implants, periprosthetic fracture fixation, surgical debridement due to infections, neurectomies and soft- tissue refashioning. Results. Over 800 surgeries have been identified with a minimum 12-month follow-up time and included in this study. These included tibial, femoral and humeral, radial-ulnar and transpelvic osseointegration cases. The majority of these were performed using a single stage protocol. While general complications such as infection and soft tissue refashioning are common, serious events such as revision and fracture are rare. Interestingly, the rate of debridements and soft-tissue refashions were found to be higher among patients who were operated using a two-stage surgery. Among all cases, there were a total of 399 re-operation events recorded which occurred among 163 patients, indicating a high recurrence rate among the same patients. We recorded a total of 112 washouts, 93 neurectomies, 117 soft tissue refashions, 53 implant revisions and 24 periprosthetic fracture fixations. Conclusions. Many events leading to readmission after the primary surgery may not necessarily be graded as a complication of the osseointegration technique. This study has identified several addition possible reasons in which an osseointegration patient may need to be re-admitted into hospital for additional surgery. It was identified that through the implementation of improved surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols, the rate of several of these re-operation events can be largely reduced, thus improving the overall outcomes of patients undergoing osseointegration surgery

In multilevel posterior cervical instrumented fusions, extending the fusion across the cervico-thoracic junction at T1 or T2 (CTJ) has been associated with decreased rate of re-operation and pseudarthrosis but with longer surgical time and increased blood loss. The impact on patient reported outcomes (PROs) remains unclear. The primary objective was to determine whether extending the fusion through the CTJ influenced PROs at 3 and 12 months after surgery. Secondary objectives were to compare the number of patients reaching the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) for the PROs and mJOA, operative time duration, intra-operative blood loss (IOBL), length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, adverse events (AEs), re-operation within 12 months of the surgery, and patient satisfaction. This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a multicenter observational cohort study of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Patients who underwent a posterior instrumented fusion of 4 levels of greater (between C2-T2) between January 2015 and October 2020 with 12 months follow-up were included. PROS (NDI, EQ5D, SF-12 PCS and MCS, NRS arm and neck pain) and mJOA were compared using ANCOVA, adjusted for baseline differences. Patient demographics, comorbidities and surgical details were abstracted. Percentafe of patient reaching MCID for these outcomes was compared using chi-square test. Operative duration, IOBL, AEs, re-operation, discharge disposittion, LOS and satisfaction were compared using chi-square test for categorical variables and independent samples t-tests for continuous variables. A total of 206 patients were included in this study (105 patients not crossing the CTJ and 101 crossing the CTJ). Patients who underwent a construct extending through the CTJ were more likely to be female and had worse baseline EQ5D and NDI scores (p> 0.05). When adjusted for baseline difference, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for the PROs and mJOA at 3 and 12 months. Surgical duration was longer (p 0.05). Satisfaction with the surgery was high in both groups but significantly different at 12 months (80% versus 72%, p= 0.042 for the group not crossing the CTJ and the group crossing the CTJ, respectively). The percentage of patients reaching MCID for the NDI score was 55% in the non-crossing group versus 69% in the group extending through the CTJ (p= 0.06). Up to 12 months after the surgery, there was no statistically significant differences in PROs between posterior construct extended to or not extended to the upper thoracic spine. The adverse event profile did not differ significantly, but longer surgical time and blood loss were associated with construct extending across the CTJ

There has been a substantial increase in the surgical treatment of unstable chest wall injuries recently. While a variety of fixation methods exist, most surgeons have used plate and screw fixation. Rib-specific locking plate systems are available, however evidence supporting their use over less-expensive, conventional plate systems (such as pelvic reconstruction plates) is lacking. We sought to address this by comparing outcomes between locking plates and non-locking plates in a cohort of patients from a prior randomized trial who received surgical stabilization of their unstable chest wall injury. We used data from the surgical group of a previous multi-centred, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing surgical fixation of acute, unstable chest wall injuries to non-operative management. In this substudy, our primary outcome was hardware-related complications and re-operation. Secondary outcomes included ventilator free days (VFDs) in the first 28 days following injury, length of ICU and hospital stay, and general health outcomes (SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores). Categorical variables are reported as frequency counts and percentages and the two groups were compared using Fisher's Exact test. Continuous data are reported as median and interquartile range and the two groups were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. From the original cohort of 207 patients, 108 had been treated surgically and had data available on the type of plate construct used. Fifty-nine patients (55%) had received fixation with non-locking plates (primarily 3.5 or 2.7 mm pelvic reconstruction plates) and 49 (45%) had received fixation with locking plates (primarily rib-specific locking plates). The two groups were similar in regard to baseline and injury characteristics. In the non-locking group, 15% of patients (9/59) had evidence of hardware loosening versus 4% (2/49 patients) in the locking group (p = 0.1). The rate of re-operation for hardware complications was 3% in the non-locking group versus 0% in the locking group (p = 0.5). No patients in either group required revision fixation for loss of reduction or nonunion. There were no differences between the groups with regard to VFDs (26.3 [19.6 – 28] vs. 27.3 [18.3 – 28], p = 0.83), length of ICU stay (6.5 [2.0 – 13.1] vs 4.1 [0 – 11], p = 0.12), length of hospital stay (17 [10 – 32] vs. 17 [10 – 24], p = 0.94) or SF-36 PCS (40.9 [33.6 – 51.0] vs 43.4 [34.1 – 49.6], p = 0.93) or MCS scores (47.8 [36.9 – 57.9] vs 46.9 [40.5 – 57.4], p = 0.95). We found no statistically significant differences in outcomes between patients who received surgical stabilization of their unstable chest wall injury when comparing non-locking plates versus locking plates. However, the rate of hardware loosening was nearly 4 times higher in the non-locking plate group and trended towards statistical significance, although re-operation related to this was less frequent. This finding is not surprising, given the inherent challenges of rib fixation including thin bones, comminution, potential osteopenia and a post-operative environment of constant motion. We believe that the increased cost of locking plate fixation in this setting is likely justifiable given these findings

The purpose of this study is to determine the re-operation rate following plate fixation of the olecranon with contoured anatomic plates. Plate fixation of the olecranon allows for management of different fracture patterns as well as osteotomies with anatomic reduction and stable fixation for early elbow mobilization. However, olecranon hardware prominence can be troublesome. Our hypothesis was with the newer generation of low profile contoured anatomic plates, the rate of hardware removal should be lower compared to previously described literature. Retrospective review for patients treated with operative fixation of the olecranon between 2010 and 2015 in the Edmonton zone was identified using population level administrative data. Radiographic screening of these patients was then carried out to identify those who received plate fixation. Fracture patterns were also characterized. Chart reviews followed to determine the indications for re-operation and other post-operative complications. Main outcome measures were re-operation rate and their indications, including hardware prominence. During the screening process, 600 surgically treated olecranon patients were identified and 321 patients were found to have plate fixation of the olecranon. Chart review determined 90 patients had re-operations demonstrating a 28% re-operation rate. Re-operation due to hardware prominence was found to be 15.6%. Other indications included hardware failure (5.3%), infection (2.8%), or contracture (2.8%). Compared to patients that did not require re-operation, the re-operation group had a higher incidence of Type III olecranon fractures (17.4% vs 8.4%, p = 0.036) and Monteggia pattern injuries (13.5% vs 4.9%, p = 0.008). Recent heteregenous data suggests the hardware removal rate related to implant prominence is between 17–54%. Compared to the literature, this study demonstrated a lower rate at 15.6% with contoured anatomic plating. Also, those with more complex fracture patterns were more likely to require re-operation

Introduction. Advantages of osseointegration have been reported to include improved functional mobility, better osseoperception, improved comfort, reduced pain, better biomechanical alignment and gait, which all lead to a less restricted lifestyle and significantly improved quality of life. A major concern of the Osseointegrated approach lies in the risk of infections occurring from the permanent transcutaneous opening often referred to as the stoma. Materials and Methods. Detailed analysis has been performed on all osseointegration surgeries performed by the Osseointegration Group of Australia and it's affiliates since 2010. All events leading to a re-admission and subsequent re-operation have been identified through hospital operation records and pooled together for meta-analysis. Events identified include: revision of implants, periprosthetic fracture fixation, surgical debridement due to infections, neurectomies and soft- tissue refashioning. Results. Majority of these cases were performed following the single-stage protocol. Among all cases, there were a total of 399 re-operation events recorded which occurred among 163 patients, indicating a high recurrence rate among the same patients. We recorded a total of 112 washouts, 93 neurectomies, 117 soft tissue refashions, 53 implant revisions and 24 periprosthetic fracture fixations. Conclusions. In this study, we have identified several addition possible reasons in which an osseointegration patient may need to be re-admitted into hospital for additional surgery. It was identified that through the implementation of improved surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols, the rate of several of these re-operation events can be largely reduced, thus improving the overall outcomes of patients undergoing osseointegration surgery

Abstract. Background. Aim of this study is to determine the difference between re-operation rates after conventional Methods of fixation of patella fractures using Metallic implants and novel technique of all suture fixation using Ethibond or fiber tape. Methods. This is a retrospective comparative analysis involving 62 patients who had a transverse patellar fracture and underwent surgery between January 2013 to December 2021. Selected patients were divided, based on different fixation methods used, into four groups - TBW group, CC screw group, Encirclage group and Suture Fixation Group. Patients were followed till bone union was evident on radiographs. Number of patients in Metallic implant group undergoing repeat operation were compared with the patients who underwent patella fracture fixation using all suture technique. Mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated for all continuous variables. Mean of the two groups was compared using unpaired t-test. Results. TBW was the most common method of fixation used in 41(66.1%) patients. 7 patients each underwent surgery using CC screw, Encirclage +/− TBW, and suture fixation respectively. Bone union was seen in about 85% of patients in all the groups suggesting all treatment modalities lead to good fracture healing. 15 patients(36.6%) of patients in TBW group and 3 patients(42.9%) in encirclage group had implant removal because of hardware-related complications (p<0.001). None of the patient who underwent All suture Fixation underwent re-operation. Conclusion. The results suggest that Suture fixation of patellar fractures is a valid treatment modality giving excellent results with similar bone union rates without any complications

Aim. We reviewed a cohort of individuals with recurrent orthopaedic infection to describe the relative rates of microbial persistence vs re-infection at recurrence surgery. Method. A cohort of 125 individuals with recurrent infection (prosthetic joint infection, fracture-related infection and osteomyelitis) from two centres in the UK between 2007 and 2021. Electronic patient records were reviewed to identify culture results from surgical samples at index surgery and the next operation for recurrent infection. Antibiotic sensitivity results were recorded as sensitive, intermediate or resistant according to contemporary sensitivity testing guidelines. Results. Among patients with recurrent infection, 78/125 (62.4%) were male, with a median age 64 years (IQR 51–73y). 76 had prosthetic joint infection, and 49 had fracture related infection or osteomyelitis. Culture results at index procedure showed the most frequently isolated species were Staphylococci (Table 1). A single species was isolated in 75/125 (60%) and mixed species in 36/125 (28.8%). No organisms were cultured in 14/125 (11.2%). At re-operation 48/125 (38.4%) individuals had an organism from the same species or group as at the index operation. In 49/125 (39.2%), none of the organisms isolated at re-operation were grown at first operation. In 28/125 (22.4%), re-operative cultures yielded no growth. For each species isolated at the index procedure, the proportion with the same, different or no organisms isolated at the next procedure were reviewed (Table 1). Staphylococci (including S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci) and Pseudomonas species showed the highest rate of persistence at the species level. Among coagulase-negative staphylococci, changes in antimicrobial sensitivity that make it unclear if these infections were truly persistent, or represented re-infection. Conclusions. Infection with different organisms was seen at similar rates (39.2% vs 38.4%) to persistent infection with the same species in this cohort. Staphylococcus aureus is the organism most likely to be persistently identified in recurrent infections

Paediatric bone sarcomas around the knee are often amenable to either endoprosthetic reconstruction or rotationplasty. Cosmesis and durability dramatically distinguish these two options, although patient-reported functional satisfaction has been similar among survivors. However, the impact on oncological and surgical outcomes for these approaches has not been directly compared. We retrospectively reviewed all wide resections for bone sarcoma of the distal femur or proximal tibia that were reconstructed either with an endoprosthesis or by rotationplasty at our institution between June 2004 and December 2014 with a minimum two year follow-up. Pertinent demographic information, surgical and oncological outcomes were reviewed. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Thirty eight patients with primary sarcomas around the knee underwent wide resection and either endoprosthetic reconstruction (n=19) or rotationplasty (n=19). Groups were comparable in terms of demographic parameters and systemic tumour burden at presentation. We found that selection of endoprosthetic reconstruction versus rotationplasty did not impact overall survival for the entire patient cohort but was significant in subgroup analysis. Two-year overall survival was 86.7% and 85.6% in the endoprosthesis and rotationplasty groups, respectively (p=0.33). When only patients with greater than 90% chemotherapy-induced necrosis were considered, overall survival was significantly better in the rotationplasty versus endoprosthesis groups (100% vs. 72.9% at two years, p=0.013). Similarly, while event-free survival was not affected by reconstruction method (60.2% vs. 73.3% at two years for endoprosthesis vs rotationplasty, p=0.27), there was a trend towards lower local recurrence in rotationplasty patients (p=0.07). When surgical outcomes were considered, a higher complication rate was seen in patients that received an endoprosthesis compared to those who underwent rotationplasty. Including all reasons for re-operation, 78.9% (n=15) of the endoprosthesis patients required a minimum of one additional surgery compared with only 26.3% (n=5) among rotationplasty patients (p=0.003). The most common reasons for re-operation in endoprosthesis patients were wound breakdown/infection (n=6), limb length discrepancy (n=6) and periprosthetic fracture (n=2). Excluding limb length equalisation procedures, the average time to re-operation in this patient population was 5.6 months (range 1 week to 23 months). Similarly, the most common reason for a secondary procedure in rotationplasty patients was wound breakdown/infection, although only two patients experienced this complication. Average time to re-operation in this group was 23.8 months (range 5 to 49 months). Endoprosthetic reconstruction and rotationplasty are both viable limb-salvage options following wide resection of high-grade bony sarcomas located around the knee in the paediatric population. Endoprosthetic reconstruction is associated with a higher complication rate and may negatively impact local recurrence. Study of a larger number of patients is needed to determine whether the reconstructive choice affects survival

Flexible fixation techniques combined with anatomic (open) syndesmosis reduction have demonstrated improved functional outcomes and rates of malreduction. Suture-button devices allow physiologic motion of the syndesmosis without need for implant removal, which may lower the risk of recurrent syndesmotic diastasis. There is limited longer-term assessment of the maintenance of reduction between static and flexible syndesmotic fixation using bilateral ankle CT evaluation. This is an a priori planned subgroup analysis of a multi-centre, randomized clinical trial comparing static syndesmosis fixation (two 3.5 mm screws) with flexible fixation (single knotless Tightrope) for patients with AO- OTA 44-C injuries. Patients who completed bilateral ankle CT scans at 3- and 12-month follow-up were included. The primary outcome measure was syndesmotic malreduction based on bilateral ankle CT scans, using the uninjured, contralateral ankle as a control. Anterior (ASD), middle (MSD), and posterior (PSD) syndesmosis distance were calculated to measure syndesmosis reduction. Secondary outcomes included re-operation, adverse events and functional outcomes including the EQ5D, Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OM), Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI), and Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI). Paired samples t-tests were used to compare injured to control ankles (R, v 3.5.1). 42 patients (24 Group S, 18 Group T) were included. ASD for Group T was 5.22mm (95%CI 4.69–5.77) at 3 months compared to 4.26mm (95%CI 3.82–4.71; p=0.007) in controls and 5.38mm (95%CI 4.72–6.04) at 12 months compared to 4.44mm (95%CI 3.73–5.16; p=0.048) in controls. ASD for Group S was 4.63mm (95%CI 4.17– 5.10) at 3 months compared to 4.67mm (95%CI 4.24–5.10; p=0.61) in controls, but significantly increased to 5.73mm (95%CI 4.81–6.66) at 12 months compared to 4.65mm (95%CI 4.15–5.15; p=0.04) in controls. MSD results were similar; Group T had a larger MSD than control ankles at 3 months (p=0.03) and 12 months (p=0.01), while the MSD in Group S was not different at 3 months (p=0.80) but increased at 12 months (p=<0.01). 88% (21/24) of Group S had broken or removed screws by 12 months. Unplanned re-operation was 15% in Group S and 4% in Group T (p=0.02), with an overall re-operation rate of 30% in Group S. There was no significant difference between treatment groups for EQ-5D, OM, FADI or WPAI at 3- or 12-month follow-up. Tightrope fixation resulted in greater diastasis of the ASD and MSD compared to contralateral, uninjured ankles at 3- and 12-months post-fixation. Group S initially had syndesmotic reduction similar to control ankles, but between 3- and 12-months post-fixation, there was significantly increased syndesmosis diastasis compared to controls. The majority of Group S (88%) had either broken screws or scheduled screw removal, which may explain the increased tibio-fibular diastasis seen at 12-months

The recruitment drive, investment and collaboration within Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (BCUHB) sites providing specialist lower limb arthroplasty and trauma service has evolved over last few years with aims to improve patient care and reduce reliance on tertiary referral centres. Through our service-evaluation project, we reviewed the results of treatment provided for periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFFs) presenting to BCUHB sites over last 4 years. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive PPFFs admitted at three BCUHB sites from January’20 to June’23 with mean follow-up of 20.8 ± 13.2 (8–49) months [n=161; Mean age: 82.2 ± 8.5 (59–101) years, Females:107]. Over the review period we noted a 23% increase in service demand for care of PPFFs. Majority were managed surgically [132/161] [38 revision arthroplasties; 94 ORIFs] at BCUHB sites and two patients were referred to tertiary centre. Average time to surgery was 3.5 days. 90% of the PPFFs were managed successfully with 10% (16/159) having orthopaedic complications needing further intervention. 6.3 (10/159) had medical complications and did not need orthopaedic re-intervention. In our series, 12-month re-operation rate was 6.1% (8/132) and 1-month, 3-month and 1-year mortality rate was 6.3%, 11.3% and 21.4% respectively. These results are comparable to the published results of PPFF management at tertiary centres. Potential cost savings compared to transfer to tertiary centre for PPFF management was £2.31 million. Thus, it is possible to successfully provide adequate care for PPFFs at DGHs and efforts should be made to appropriately equip and adequately staff DGHs, to provide service for local PPFF care