Aims

A limited number of investigations with conflicting results have described perivascular lymphocytic infiltration (PVLI) in the setting of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to determine if PVLI found in TKAs at the time of aseptic revision surgery was associated with worse clinical outcomes and survivorship.

Background

A limited number of investigations with conflicting results have described perivascular lymphocytic infiltration (PVLI) in the setting of total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine if PVLI found in total knee replacements at the time of aseptic revision surgery was associated with worse clinical outcomes and survivorship.

Aims. Achievement of accurate microbiological diagnosis prior to revision is key to reducing the high rates of persistent infection after revision knee surgery. The effect of change in the microorganism between the first- and second-stage revision of total knee arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) on the success of management is not clear. Methods. A two-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted to review the outcome of patients who have undergone two-stage revision for treatment of knee arthroplasty PJI, focusing specifically on isolated micro-organisms at both the first- and second-stage procedure. Patient demographics, medical, and orthopaedic history data, including postoperative outcomes and subsequent treatment, were obtained from the electronic records and medical notes. Results. The study cohort consisted of 84 patients, of whom 59.5% (n = 50) had successful eradication of their infection at a mean follow-up of 4.7 years. For the 34 patients who had recurrence of infection, 58.8% (n = 20) had a change in isolated organism, compared to 18% (n = 9) in the infection eradication group (p < 0.001). When adjusting for confound, there was no association when the growth on the second stage was the same as the first (odd ratio (OR) 2.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49 to 12.50; p = 0.269); however, when a different organism was identified at the second stage, this was independently associated with failure of treatment (OR 8.40, 95% CI 2.91 to 24.39; p < 0.001). There were no other significant differences between the two cohorts with regard to patient demographics or type of organisms isolated. Conclusion. Change in the identified microorganism between first- and second-stage revision for PJI was associated with failure of management. Identification of this change in the microorganism prior to commencement of the second stage may help target antibiotic management and could improve the success of surgery in these patients. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(9):720–727

Abstract. Introduction. National BOAST guidelines have been developed to coordinate and improve the standard of care for all patients with problems after knee replacement surgery. Since the inception of these guidelines we wanted to assess the impact of these guidelines on patients and their pathways following their discussions at our weekly revision MDT meetings. Methodology. Trust casenotes programs, PACS software and MDT notes were evaluated over the past 12 months (January 2022 to December 2022) to collect data for all patients with problematic knee replacements. Current in-patients discussed at MDT were excluded. Results. In total 52 patients with problematic knees were discussed. In terms of the SPECIFIC criteria described in BOAST guidelines, 39% met one or more of these criteria (component loosening, infection, instability, component wear) of which 90% are have had or planned for revision surgery. Of those (61%) not meeting this criteria, 77% have been deemed not to have a surgical cause after further investigations with the rest still pending further investigation. Conclusion. The publication of guidelines has aided in the ongoing management of patients with problematic knee replacements. From our MDT discussions over the last year, its clear that when appropriately investigated and a cause found from the SPECIFIC criteria, patients are offered appropriate revision surgery. Further work with longer-term outcomes from MDT discussions would help to evaluate the impact of these discussions on which problematic knees benefit most from revision surgery and the effect on knee revision networks

Aims. The aim of this study was to identify variables associated with time to revision, demographic details associated with revision indication, and type of prosthesis employed, and to describe the survival of hinge knee arthroplasty (HKA) when used for first-time knee revision surgery and factors that were associated with re-revision. Methods. Patient demographic details, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, indication for revision, surgical approach, surgeon grade, implant type (fixed and rotating), time of revision from primary implantation, and re-revision if undertaken were obtained from the National Joint Registry data for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man over an 18-year period (2003 to 2021). Results. There were 3,855 patient episodes analyzed with a median age of 73 years (interquartile range (IQR) 66 to 80), and the majority were female (n = 2,480, 64.3%). The median time to revision from primary knee arthroplasty was 1,219 days (IQR 579 to 2,422). Younger age (p < 0.001), decreasing ASA grade (p < 0.001), and indications for revision of sepsis (p < 0.001), unexplained pain (p < 0.001), non-polyethylene wear (p < 0.001), and malalignment (p < 0.001) were all associated with an earlier time to revision from primary implantation. The median follow-up was 4.56 years (range 0.00 to 17.52), during which there were 410 re-revisions. The overall unadjusted probability of re-revision for all revision HKAs at one, five, and ten years after surgery were 2.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 3.3), 10.7% (95% CI 9.6 to 11.9), and 16.2% (95% CI 14.5 to 17.9), respectively. Male sex (p < 0.001), younger age (p < 0.001), revision for septic indications (p < 0.001) or implant fracture (p = 0.010), a fixed hinge (p < 0.001), or surgery performed by a non-consultant grade (p = 0.023) were independently associated with an increased risk of re-revision. Conclusion. There were several factors associated with time to first revision. The re-revision rate was 16.2% at ten years; however, the risk factors associated with an increased risk of re-revision could be used to counsel patients regarding their outcome. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(1):47–55

Abstract. Introduction. The prevalence of recurrent infection following two-stage exchange arthroplasty following failure of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been reported to be 10% to 25%. There is limited literature available on repeat two stage revisions for TKA infection with only small cohorts and variable success rates. Methodology. A retrospective cohort study investigating the outcome of two stage revision arthroplasty for treatment of TKA infection was conducted with the aim of identifying factors linked to recurrence of infection. A consecutive cohort of all microbiology intra-operative periprosthetic knee samples from a single revision arthroplasty centre between January 2010 and December 2016 was identified. The final cohort consisted of 658 samples taken during 64 patients undergoing two stage revision knee surgery for infection. Patient demographics, medical and orthopaedic history data including post-operative outcomes and subsequent treatment was obtained from the electronic records system and medical notes. Results. 65.6% of the cohort (N=42) had successful eradication of their infection. For the twenty-two patients that had failure of their two stage revision, twenty patients had samples available from further surgical intervention. Sixteen patients (80%) had different organisms isolated when they had repeat surgical samples taken when compared to their first stage samples. Overall, for subsequent treatments there was a success rate of 75% if the same organism was identified and 62.5% if there were new isolated organisms. Conclusion. These findings may have implications for the treatment strategies chosen for re-infection after two stage TKA revisions if new causative organisms are isolated

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to study the short-term outcome of a contemporary modular revision knee system used in our centre for managing Knee revision arthroplasty. METHODS. Preoperative, one and two years follow up scores and radiographic analysis were recorded from 72 consecutive knee revision cases performed between 2006 and 2008. Outcome measures included the American Knee Society (AKSS), Oxford (OKS) and WOMAC scores and range of motion. The radiographic assessment included review of standing AP, lateral and skyline views. Figgie's method was used to measure the joint line reproduction. A difference of 5 mm (pre=op/post-op) was deemed satisfactory. RESULTS. 72 patients were included in this study, 38 male: 34 females with a mean age of 71.2 (50 -87 yrs.). Mean BMI-26.03, (Range 11-50). Indications for surgery in these patients- were aseptic loosening (38), instability (15), persistent pain and stiffness (7), polyarthropathy (1), ligament laxity (7) and infection (4). The mean American Knee scores, and WOMAC scores at, 1 year and 2 years follow up showed significant improvements in pain and function (Table 1). The mean oxford knee score improved from 14/48 pre-operatively to 34/48 at 2yrs. (P value <0.0001). Radiographic assessment showed a mean AP coronal femoral angle of 95.3 degrees (range 89.6-99.9 degrees), coronal tibial angle of 90.1 degrees (Range 85.1-98.8 degrees). The mean sagittal femoral and tibial angles were 88.4 and 90.4 degrees respectively. The joint line level was reproduced in all cases. DISCUSSION. The short-term results with the Legion Knee revision system showed significant improvement in functional and pain scores in these patients irrespective of their indications for revision surgery. The used system also showed good outcome scores that match or beat published series on revisions. It also showed a good ability to restore joint line

We present detailed information about early morbidity after aseptic revision knee replacement from a nationwide study. All aseptic revision knee replacements undertaken between 1st October 2009 and 30th September 2011 were analysed using the Danish National Patient Registry with additional information from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. The 1218 revisions involving 1165 patients were subdivided into total revisions, large partial revisions, partial revisions and revisions of unicondylar replacements (UKR revisions). The mean age was 65.0 years (27 to 94) and the median length of hospital stay was four days (interquartile range: 3 to 5), with a 90 days re-admission rate of 9.9%, re-operation rate of 3.5% and mortality rate of 0.2%. The age ranges of 51 to 55 years (p = 0.018), 76 to 80 years (p < 0.001) and ≥ 81 years (p < 0.001) were related to an increased risk of re-admission. The age ranges of 76 to 80 years (p = 0.018) and the large partial revision subgroup (p = 0.073) were related to an increased risk of re-operation. The ages from 76 to 80 years (p < 0.001), age ≥ 81 years (p < 0.001) and surgical time > 120 min (p <  0.001) were related to increased length of hospital stay, whereas the use of a tourniquet (p = 0.008) and surgery in a low volume centre (p = 0.013) were related to shorter length of stay. . In conclusion, we found a similar incidence of early post-operative morbidity after aseptic knee revisions as has been reported after primary procedures. This suggests that a length of hospital stay ≤ four days and discharge home at that time is safe following aseptic knee revision surgery in Denmark. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1649–56

Aim. To assess the survival of revision knee replacements at our institution and to identify prognostic factors that predict failure in revision knee surgery. Materials and methods. This was a retrospective review of 52 patients who had undergone revision knee surgery as identified by hospital clinical coding. Patient demographics, physiological parameters, reason for revision, type of revision implant and last date of follow up were recorded from the medical records. Implant survival was analysed both from the index primary procedure to revision and from definitive reconstruction at revision to re-operation for any cause. Results. The median time from index primary to first revision was 1428 days (331-5000). A P value of 0.05 was set as the significance level. Patients with a diagnosis of inflammatory arthropathy had a significantly shorter time to revision compared to those with osteoarthritis. Time to revision was not significantly different for those being revised for infection and those not infected. Following reconstruction, there was no significant difference in the reoperation rates for infected vs non-infected implants. The 5-year implant survival for all revision knee replacements with re-operation for any cause as the end point was 72.2% (95%CI 52.3-87.9). At 5 years there was no significant difference in implant survival of infected and non-infected revisions. Conclusion. The implant survival of revision knee replacements for all causes in our institute was 72.2% at 5 years. There was no significant difference in 5-year survival between infected and non-infected revisions. Patients with an inflammatory arthropathy had a significantly shorter time to revision compared to those with osteoarthritis

We report the five- to-ten year results of Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute type-2 bone defects treated with modular metal augments in revision knee surgery. A total of 102 revision knee arthroplasties in patients with type-2 defects treated with augments and stems were prospectively studied. Seven patients (seven knees) had incomplete follow-up and 15 patients (16 knees) died with the arthroplasty in situ. The mean follow-up of the 79 remaining knees was 7 ± 2 years (5 to 11). The presence of non-progressive radiolucent lines around the augment in 14% of knees was not associated with poorer knee scores, the range of movement, survival of the component or the type of insert which was used (p > 0.05). The survival of the components was 92 ± 0.03% at 11 years (95% CI, 10.3 to 11.2). We recommend the use of modular augmentation devices to treat type-2 defects in revision knee surgery

Aims

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a challenging complication of any arthroplasty procedure. We reviewed our use of static antibiotic-loaded cement spacers (ABLCSs) for staged management of PJI where segmental bone loss, ligamentous instability, or soft-tissue defects necessitate a static construct. We reviewed factors contributing to their failure and techniques to avoid these complications when using ABLCSs in this context.

Aims

Metal particles detached from metal-on-metal hip prostheses (MoM-THA) have been shown to cause inflammation and destruction of tissues. To further explore this, we investigated the histopathology (aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesions (ALVAL) score) and metal concentrations of the periprosthetic tissues obtained from patients who underwent revision knee arthroplasty. We also aimed to investigate whether accumulated metal debris was associated with ALVAL-type reactions in the synovium.

Aims

This study aims to identify the top unanswered research priorities in the field of knee surgery using consensus-based methodology.

Background. Pseudotumor or high grade ALVAL (aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesion) development around total hip replacements secondary to local metal debris generation – especially in the setting of metal-on-metal bearings – is a well-recognised histopathologic phenomenon. Recent work has suggested a strong genetic correlation with an individual's risk of such lesion development following metal exposure. Emerging data have highlighted a similar potential concern around total knee replacements (TKRs), particularly with increasing construct modularity. To date, the body-of-knowledge pertaining to TKR-associated ALVALs has largely been limited to individual case reports or small retrospective case series’, with no large-scale investigation looking at this potential complication. This study sought to establish the preliminary prevalence of pseudotumor or high grade ALVAL formation seen at the revision of primary TKRs and to establish the correlation between histologic ALVAL grade and patient-reported functional outcomes. Methods. Findings of 1263 consecutive patients undergoing revision knee surgery, at a high-volume referral center, were reviewed. 161 cases of active infection were excluded. Complete histopathology reports were subsequently available for 321 (29.1%) non-infective cases. Each case was independently histologically-classified using a previously validated scoring system reflecting ALVAL grade. Post-operative patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) were available for 134 patients (41.7%), allowing direct correlation between functional performance and the established histopathology results. Results. In total, 23 high grade lesions were identified, including 5 distinct pseudotumors, representing 7.2% (23/321) of the cohort. When compared by histologic grade, Jonkeere-Terpstra testing yielded P-values of 0.02 and 0.03 for the Oxford Knee Score and WOMAC datasets, respectively, suggesting a high correlation between ALVAL grade and functional knee scores. Conclusions. The results of this large histologic analysis suggest a prevalence of pseudotumor or high grade ALVAL development at revision TKR surgery of greater than 7%. This unexpectedly high result may contribute clinical insight into the previously under-appreciated significance of metal debris-related local tissue reactions around TKRs. The findings herein also demonstrate a strong near-linear inverse relationship between patient-reported clinical knee performance and the underlying histologic grade of local tissue reaction. Collectively, this information may provide some further understanding of a proportion of the widely quoted 15–20% of patients who remain dissatisfied with their TKR after surgery. This result has potential diagnostic and management implications for clinicians treating patients with underperforming in situ TKRs and should prompt consideration of an ALVAL secondary to local wear debris-generated metallosis in the differential diagnosis

Aims

The use of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) to delay total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in young patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and constitutional deformity remains debated. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of TKA after HTO compared to TKA without HTO, using the time from the index OA surgery as reference (HTO for the study group, TKA for the control group).

Aims

To investigate the impact of consecutive perioperative care transitions on in-hospital recovery of patients who had primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) over an 11-year period.

Aims

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) around the knee are challenging injuries. This study aims to describe the characteristics of knee PPFs and the impact of patient demographics, fracture types, and management modalities on in-hospital mortality.

Aims

The primary objective of this registry-based study was to compare patient-reported outcomes of cementless and cemented medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) during the first postoperative year. The secondary objective was to assess one- and three-year implant survival of both fixation techniques.

Aims

In cases of severe periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee, salvage procedures such as knee arthrodesis (KA) or above-knee amputation (AKA) must be considered. As both treatments result in limitations in quality of life (QoL), we aimed to compare outcomes and factors influencing complication rates, mortality, and mobility.

Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a complex procedure which carries both a greater risk for patients and greater cost for the treating hospital than does a primary TKA. As well as the increased cost of peri-operative investigations, blood transfusions, surgical instrumentation, implants and operating time, there is a well-documented increased length of stay which accounts for most of the actual costs associated with surgery. We compared revision surgery for infection with revision for other causes (pain, instability, aseptic loosening and fracture). Complete clinical, demographic and economic data were obtained for 168 consecutive revision TKAs performed at a tertiary referral centre between 2005 and 2012. Revision surgery for infection was associated with a mean length of stay more than double that of aseptic cases (21.5 vs 9.5 days, p < 0.0001). The mean cost of a revision for infection was more than three times that of an aseptic revision (£30 011 (. sd. 4514) vs £9655 (. sd. 599.7), p < 0.0001). . Current NHS tariffs do not fully reimburse the increased costs of providing a revision knee surgery service. Moreover, especially as greater costs are incurred for infected cases. These losses may adversely affect the provision of revision surgery in the NHS. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:197–201