Introduction. Day stay surgery for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions is an increasingly common practice and has driven clinicians to come up with postoperative pain regimes that allow same day mobilisation and a safe and timely discharge. There is a paucity of literature surrounding the use of intraosseous (IO) ropivacaine used as a Bier's block to provide both intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in lower limb surgery. Methods. This patient blinded, pilot study randomised 15 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction to receive either IO ropivacaine 1.5 or 2.0 mg/kg; or 300 mg of ropivacaine as local infiltration (standard of care). Toxic plasma levels of ropivacaine have been defined in the literature and therefore the primary outcome for this study was arterial plasma concentration of ropivacaine as a means to determine its safety profile. Samples were taken via an arterial line at prespecified times after tourniquet deflation. Secondary outcomes that we were interested in included immediate postoperative pain scores using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and perioperative opioid equivalent consumption. Results. Participants had a mean age of 27.8 (SD 9.2) years and 87% (13/15) were male. All patients in the intervention group receiving IO ropivacaine had plasma concentrations well below the threshold for central nervous system (CNS) toxicity (0.60 µg/ml). The highest plasma concentration was achieved in the intervention group receiving 1.5 mg/kg dose of ropivacaine reaching 3.59 mg/ml. This would equate to 0.22 µg/ml of free plasma ropivacaine. There were no differences across the three groups regarding pain scores or perioperative opioid consumption. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that IO administration of 0.2% ropivacaine is both safe and effective in reducing perioperative pain in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. There may be scope to increase the IO dose further or utilise other analgesics via the IO regional route to improve perioperative pain relief

Enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) utilise multimodal rehabilitation techniques to reduce post-operative pain and accelerate the rehabilitation process following surgery. Originally described following elective colonic surgery enhanced recovery pathways have gained increasing use following elective hip and knee joint replacement in recent years. Early studies have indicated that enhanced recovery pathways can reduce length of hospital stay, reduce complications and improve cost-effectiveness of joint replacement surgery. Despite this growing evidence base uptake has been slow in certain centres and many surgeons are yet to utilise enhanced recovery pathways in their practice. We look at the process and effects of implementing an enhanced recovery pathway following total hip replacement surgery at a district general hospital in the United Kingdom. A retrospective study was initially undertaken over a four-month period to assess patient demographics, length of stay, time to physiotherapy and complication rates including re-admission within 28 days. Based on national recommendations an enhanced recovery pathway protocol was then implemented for an elective total hip replacement list. Inclusion criteria were elective patients undergoing primary total hip replacement (THR) surgery. The pathway included pre-operative nutrition optimisation, 4mg ondansetron, 8mg dexamethasone and 1g tranexamic acid at induction and 150mL ropivacaine HCL 0.2%, 30mg ketorolac and adrenaline (RKA) mix infiltration to joint capsule, external rotators, gluteus tendon, iliotibial band, soft-tissues and skin around the hip joint. The patient was mobilised four-hours after surgery where possible and aimed to be discharged once mobile and pain was under control. Following implementation a prospective study was undertaken to compare patient demographics, length of stay and complication rates including re-admission within 28 days. 34 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in each group pre and post-enhanced recovery pathway. Following implementation of an enhanced recovery pathway mean length of stay decreased from 5.4 days to 3.5 days (CI 1.94, p < 0.0001). Sub-group analysis based on ASA grade revealed that this reduction in length of stay was most pronounced in ASA 1 patients with mean length of stay reduced from 5.0 days to 3.2 days (CI 1.83, p < 0.0001). There was no significant change in the number of complications or re-admission rates following enhanced recovery pathway. The enhanced recovery pathway was quick and easy to implement with co-ordination between surgeons, anaesthetist, nursing staff and patients. This observational study of consecutive primary total hip replacement patients shows a substantial reduction in length of stay with no change in complication rates after the introduction of a multimodal enhanced recovery protocol. Both of these factors reduce hospital costs for elective THR patients and may improve patient experiences

Peri-articular injections (PAI) have become an important component in many multimodal pain protocols after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Liposomal bupivacaine has emerged as a highly marketed and touted ingredient for PAI. However, the true efficacy of this material, particularly compared with less expensive PAI “cocktails” such as traditional bupivacaine or ropivacaine, has not been proven to date. Ropivacaine is considered a long-active local analgesic and in combination with epinephrine, ketorolac and clonidine has been shown to be a very effective PAI in a multimodal pain program. Liposomal bupivacaine has been similarly touted as a long-acting PAI. Initial reports provided support for liposomal bupivacaine PAI's providing similar pain relief as epidurals or femoral nerve blocks. The authors of these studies tout comparable pain control with decreased length of stay attributable to avoiding the side effects of epidurals and regional blocks. However, the ultimate clinical issue relates to how liposomal bupivacaine PAI's compares to traditional PAI cocktail ingredients such as bupivacaine and ropivacaine, which also avoid deleterious effects of regional analgesia, and at a much cheaper price point. Fortunately the highest quality research to date, which includes randomised prospective trials and retrospective controlled cohort studies, have reported consistent results. In a retrospective cohort study comparing a traditional ropivacaine and epinephrine versus liposomal bupivacaine PAI demonstrated no difference between the two groups in inpatient pain scores when used in a comprehensive multimodal pain control program. Further, two prospective randomised trials reported no difference in liposomal bupivacaine PAI compared to a traditional PAI of either bupivacaine or ropivacaine, epinephrine, ketorolac and clonidine. Finally, there have been some authors who contend the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine PAI's is entirely dependent on a meticulous injection technique, however, comparative studies against traditional PAI ingredients with this recommended technique do not exist. In summary, the existing data supports that liposomal bupivacaine is an effective PAI that can be used to provide comparable pain relief to that achieved by regional blocks. However, liposomal bupivacaine has not been shown to provide superior pain relief when compared to traditional ropivacaine or bupivacaine PAI's in multimodal pain protocols after TKA. Further, liposomal bupivacaine is prohibitively priced at approximately six times that of ropivacaine-based PAI cocktails. Therefore, the “game changer” is likely the implementation of peri-articular injections as an essential component of multimodal pain control programs and NOT liposomal bupivacaine

Background. Total knee arthroplasty is associated with early postoperative pain. Appropriate pain management is important to facilitate postoperative rehabilitation and positive functional outcomes. This study compares outcomes in TKA with three techniques; local infiltration analgesia, single shot femoral nerve block and intrathecal morphine. Methods. Forty-five patients undergoing elective primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) with were randomized into one of three groups in a double blind proof of concept study. Study arm 1 received local infiltration analgesia ropivacaine intra-operatively, an elastomeric device of ropivacaine for 24 hours post-op. Study arm 2 received a femoral nerve block of ropivacaine with placebo local infiltration analgesia and placebo intrathecal morphine. Study arm 3 received intrathecal morphine, placebo femoral nerve block and placebo local infiltration analgesia. All patients received standardized pre-operative, intraoperative and Post-operative analgesic medication. Participants were mobilized at 4 hrs, 24hrs and 48 hrs post operation. Range of Motion, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain intensity scores and two minute walk test and Timed Up and Go test were performed. Postoperative use of analgesic drugs was recorded. Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were completed at preoperative and 6 weeks post op. Results. Assessment of the efficacy of analgesia will be conducted using VAS pain scores collected preoperatively, 0–24hrs and 24–48 hours postoperatively between the three randomized groups. Frequency of use of other analgesia and need for PCA will be compared between groups at 0–24hr and 24–48hrs post operatively. The assessment of functional outcomes will be measured between the three groups by comparing the ability to mobilize the first 4 hrs after surgery, maximal flexion and extension, two minute walk test and timed up-and-go preoperatively, on postoperative day 1 and 2 and 6 weeks. Patient reported outcome measures KSS, Oxford Knee score and KOOS will be compared for the three study arms. Conclusion. Results from the study will provide important information for the management of TKA in the hospital setting. The comparison of the three commonly used analgesic techniques and mobilization outcomes are pertinent for physiotherapy and rehabilitation management, anaesthetic specialists, nursing staff, orthopaedic surgeons and patients

Total knee arthroplasty is associated with early postoperative pain. Appropriate pain management is important to facilitate postoperative rehabilitation and positive functional outcomes. This study compares outcomes in TKA with three techniques; local infiltration analgesia, single shot femoral nerve block and intrathecal morphine. Methods. Forty-five patients undergoing elective primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) with were randomized into one of three groups in a double blind proof of concept study. Study arm 1 received local infiltration analgesia ropivacaine intra-operatively, an elastomeric device of ropivacaine for 24 hours post-op. Study arm 2 received a femoral nerve block of ropivacaine with placebo local infiltration analgesia and placebo intrathecal morphine. Study arm 3 received intrathecal morphine, placebo femoral nerve block and placebo local infiltration analgesia. All patients received standardized pre-operative, intraoperative and Post-operative analgesic medication. Participants were mobilized at 4 hrs, 24hrs and 48 hrs post operation. Range of Motion, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain intensity scores and two minute walk test and Timed Up and Go test were performed. Postoperative use of analgesic drugs was recorded. Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were completed at preoperative and 6 weeks post op. Results. Preliminary results of 32 participants convey the positive outcomes after total knee replacement demonstrated by the improvement in Oxford Knee Score and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome score. There are marked improvements in the 2-minute walk tests at the six week time-point. At day one post-operative only 5 participants were unable to walk. Patient-controlled analgesia was used on 5 occasions on day one, 2 of which continued on day two. Sedation scores were recorded in six participants on day one and 2 on day two. Nausea was reported in 5 cases on day one and 9 on day two. Urinary catheter was needed in 5 cases on day one. Importantly the study remains blinded, therefore an analysis of the three study arms is not available and is therefore currently difficult to report on the statistical significance. There will be further assessment of the efficacy of analgesia using VAS pain scores, analgesia consumption and side effects collected preoperatively, 0–24hrs and 24–48 hours postoperatively between the three randomized groups. The assessment of functional outcomes will be measured between the three groups by comparing the ability to mobilize the first 4 hrs after surgery, maximal flexion and extension, two minute walk test and timed up-and-go preoperatively, on postoperative day 1 and 2 and 6 weeks. Conclusion. Results from the study will provide important information for the management of TKA in the hospital setting. We anticipate completion of all 45 surgeries in the next 2 months. The Blinding codes with be broken thereafter and full data analysis performed. The comparison of the three commonly used analgesic techniques and mobilization outcomes will allow enhanced management of patient's post-operative pain with earlier discharge from hospital an lower complication rates

Pain immediately following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often severe and can inhibit patients' rehabilitation. Recently, adductor canal blocks have been shown to provide adequate analgesia and spare quadriceps muscle strength in the early postoperative period. We devised a single injection motor sparing knee block (MSB) by targeting the adductor canal and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve with a posterior knee infiltration under ultrasound. Our primary objective was to evaluate the analgesia duration of the MSB in comparison to a standard periarticular infiltration (PAI) analgesia using patients' first rescue analgesia as the end point. Secondary outcomes measured were quadriceps muscle strength and length of stay. We randomised 82 patients scheduled for elective TKA to receive either the preoperative MSB (0.5% ropivacaine, 2.5ug/ml epinephrine, 10mg morphine, and 30mg ketorolac) or intraoperative periarticular infiltration (0.3% ropivacaine, 2.5ug/ml epinephrine, 10mg morphine, and 30mg ketorolac). Duration of analgesia, postoperative quadriceps power, and length of stay were evaluated postoperatively. Analgesic duration was found to be significantly different between groups. The MSB had a mean duration of 18.06 ± 1.68 hours while the PAI group had a mean duration of 9.25 ± 1.68 hours for a mean difference of 8.8 hours (95% CI 3.98 to 13.62), p<0.01. There were no significant differences between groups in quadriceps muscle strength power at 20 minutes (p=0.91) or 6 hours (p=0.66) after block administration. Length of stay was also not significantly different between the groups (p=0.29). Motor sparing blocks provide longer analgesia than patients receiving periarticular infiltration while not significantly reducing quadriceps muscle strength or increasing length of hospital stay

Introduction. Pain control following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) heavily influences timing of mobilization and rehabilitation postoperatively as well as length of hospital stay. Recently, periarticular injection of liposomal bupivacaine (EXPAREL®; Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, California) has demonstrated pain relief comparable to femoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia in TKA with earlier mobilization and shortened hospital stay. In order to better explore the use of EXPAREL® in TKA, we standardized the postoperative analgesia to intraoperative periarticular injection of multimodal pain management, which is a recommended postoperative method of pain control in TKA. We studied the effectiveness of periarticular EXPAREL® in TKA postoperative pain control, including impact on early mobilization and length of hospital stay, compared to another local analgesic (Ropivacaine) when both are used as part of a multimodal pain management approach. Methods. We performed a double blind, randomized, controlled, prospective, IRB-approved study that enrolled 96 participants who underwent a unilateral TKA by one surgeon between May 2014 and March 2015. The two randomized groups were as follows: group 1 (control group) was given the standard intra-articular “pain cocktail” injection, consisting of ropivacaine, ketorolac, morphine, and epinephrine mixed with saline into a 100cc preparation and group 2 (study group) was given a similar intra-articular injection consisting of bupivacaine, ketorolac, morphine, and epinephrine mixed with saline into an 80cc preparation as well as an injection of EXPAREL®, 20cc of 1.3% EXPAREL®, to total 100cc. All patients included in the study were determined to be opioid naïve as described by the Food and Drug Administration criteria. Patients were treated with the same postoperative pain management protocol as well as the same post-operative physical therapy program. The consumption of oral and intravenous narcotics at specific time points as well as total use was recorded during hospital stay. We recorded Visual Analog Pain scores, hours to ambulate 100 feet and length of hospital stay (hours). Both the investigator and the patient were blinded as to which group the patient was randomized, making this a double blind study. Results. On a per hour basis, the mean use of narcotics of the two groups differed by only 0.1mg. For total narcotic use during hospital stay, the weighted sum used by patients in the EXPAREL® group, 97.7mg of hydrocodone ±42.84 mg, exceeded the weighted sum, 89.6 mg of hydrocodone ± 58.57 mg, used by patients in the control group. The difference between the two groups was not significant. The means for length of stay differed by only 26 minutes and the difference was not significant. Similarly insignificant, the means for the time to ambulate 100 feet differed by 53 minutes, with the EXPAREL® group actually taking the longer time. The two groups did not differ for Visual Analog Score for pain on day 1 or day 2 post-operatively. Conclusion. When comparing the use of EXPAREL® to another multimodal pain management approach using ropivacaine, there is no difference in post-operative opioid consumption, Visual Analong Scores for pain, amount of time to ambulate or length of hospital stay

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) can occur after elective mid/hindfoot and ankle surgery. Effective treatment approaches for CPSP in this population have not been extensively investigated. The impact of multimodal strategies on CPSP following elective mid/hindfoot surgery is unknown due to both the heterogeneity of acute pain management and the lack of a recognized definition specific to this type of surgery. This study aimed to identify and evaluate current pain management strategies after elective mid/hindfoot and ankle surgery. We conducted a systematic review under Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Three databases (MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library) were electronically searched for English studies published between 1990 and July 2017. Reference lists of relevant systematic reviews were also manually searched. Comparative studies of adults undergoing elective mid/hindfoot and ankle surgery were included. Two reviewers independently reviewed studies and assessed their methodological quality. Of 1,159 studies, seven high-quality randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria. Though all studies examined regional anesthesia techniques, intervention heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Participants were typically followed up to 48 hours post-operatively. Interventions effective at reducing postoperative pain and/or opioid consumption included inserting popliteal catheters under ultrasound instead of nerve stimulation guidance, infusing perineural dexamethasone, bupivacaine, or ropivacaine perioperatively, and adding a femoral catheter infusion to a popliteal catheter infusion. Only one study assessed pain six months following elective mid/hindfoot and ankle surgery, demonstrating significant pain reduction with activity with the addition of a femoral to popliteal catheter infusion. There is an overwhelming lack of evidence regarding CPSP and its management for patients undergoing elective mid/hindfoot and ankle surgery. Although specific regional anesthesia techniques and adjuncts may be effective at reducing in-hospital pain and opioid consumption after elective mid/hindfoot and ankle surgery, our systematic review identified only seven studies addressing multimodal pain management in this population. Further comparative studies with longer-term follow-up are required

Background. Evidence from recent trials has supported the efficacy of periarticular analgesic injection for pain control following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, no randomized controlled trial has compared the efficacy of periarticular analgesic injection with that of other regimens for simultaneous bilateral TKA. Methods. We conducted a randomized controlled trial in which patients scheduled for simultaneous bilateral TKA were randomly assigned to receive periarticular analgesic injection or epidural analgesia. In the periarticular analgesic injection group, the injection contained 7.5 mg/ml ropivacaine 40 ml, 10 mg/ml morphine hydrochloride hydrate 1.0 ml, 1.0 mg/ml epinephrine 0.6 ml, methylprednisolone 80 mg, and ketoprofen 50 mg. These agents were mixed with normal saline to a combined volume of 120 ml. The 60 ml of the cocktail was injected into each knee. In the epidural analgesia group, the catheter was placed at the L2–3 or L3–4 level, and connected to an infusion pump delivering continuous infusion (flow rate: 4 ml/h) of 100 ml of 2 mg/ml ropivacaine plus 1.0 ml of 10 mg/ml morphine hydrochloride hydrate. Surgery was managed under spinal anaesthesia. Surgical techniques and postoperative medication protocols were identical in both groups. The primary endpoint was postoperative pain at rest, quantified as the area under the curve (AUC) of the score on a visual analogue scale. Results. Seventy-one patients with 142 knees were randomly assigned to receive periarticular analgesic injection or epidural analgesia. The flow chart presented in Figure 1 outlines the trial. The periarticular analgesic injection group had a significantly lower AUC at 4–24 hour compared with the epidural analgesia group (174.9 ± 181.5 versus 360.4 ± 360.6; p = 0.0073), while no difference in the AUC was noted at 24–72 hour (1388.1 ± 727.2 versus 1467.3 ± 810.1; p = 0.67). The consumption of diclofenac sodium suppositories as rescue analgesia was significantly lower in the periarticular analgesic injection group than in the epidural analgesia group on the night of surgery (0.16 ± 0.4 versus 0.70 ± 0.9; p = 0.0013). The incidence of nausea on the night of surgery and postoperative day 1 and that of pruritus were significantly lower in the periarticular analgesic injection group than in the epidural analgesia group (7.4 % versus 45.5 %; p = 0.0031, 7.4 % versus 54.5 %; P = 0.0003, and 0 % versus 15.2 %; p = 0.014, respectively). Conclusions. Compared with epidural analgesia, periarticular analgesic injection following simultaneous bilateral TKA was associated with better postoperative pain relief and decreased opioid-related side-effects. Periarticular analgesic injection is preferable to epidural analgesia for postoperative pain relief after simultaneous bilateral TKA

Introduction. Local anaesthetic has been reported to have a detrimental effect on human chondrocytes both in vitro and in vivo. Magnesium, an NMDA-receptor antagonist, may be an alternative intra-articular analgesic agent following arthroscopy. We aimed to report the dose response effect of commonly used local anaesthteitc on chondrocyte viability and also report on the effect of adding magnesium to local anaesthetic. Methods. Human chondrocytes were grown under standard conditions. Cells were exposed to either lignocaine (0.5, 1, 2%), levobupivacaine (0.125, 0.25, 0.5%), bupivacaine (0.125, −.25, 0.5%) or ropivacaine (0.1875, 0.375, 0.75%) for 15 minutes. Cells were also exposed to a local anesthetic agent with the addition of magnesium (10, 20, or 50%). Cells exposed to media or saline served as controls. The MTS assay was used to assess cell viability 24-hours after exposure. Results. One-way ANOVA showed an expected dose response in all local anaesthetic groups with the exception of lignocaine. Magnesium alone was no more toxic than normal saline (P>0.3). 50% magnesium showed similar effect on cell viability to the least toxic local anaesthetic (lignocaine 1%, P=0.31). The addition of magnesium to the local anesthetic agents resulted in greater cell viability than when cells were treated with the respective local anaesthetic alone (lignocaine (P=0.033), levobupivacaine (P=0.007), bupivacaine (P<0.001), ropivacaine (P<0.001)). Conclusion. We have shown that cell viability is greater in the presence of magnesium than selected local anaesthetics and also with the addition of magnesium to local anaesthetic compared to the local anesthetic agent alone. We believe that these findings offer support to an alternative intra-articular analgesia following arthroscopy

Dexmedetomidine, an alpha 2 agonist, has been approved for providing sedation in the intensive care unit. Along with sedative properties, it has analgesic activity through its highly selective action on alpha 2 receptors. Recent studies have examined the use of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to prolong the duration of peripheral nerve blocks. Studies showing effectiveness of dexmedetomidine for adductor canal block in knee surgery are small. Also, its effectiveness has not been compared to Epinephrine which is a strong alpha and beta receptor agonist. In a previous study, we showed that motor sparing knee blocks significantly increased the duration of analgesia compared with periarticular knee infiltration using local anesthetic mixture containing Epinephrine following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In this study, we compared two local anesthetic mixtures: one containing Dexmedetomidine and the other Epinephrine for prolongation of motor sparing knee block in primary TKA patients. After local ethics board approval and gaining Notice of Compliance (NOC) from Health Canada for use of Dexmedetomidine perineurally, 70 patients between the ages 18 – 95 of ASA class I to III undergoing unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty were enrolled. Motor sparing knee block − 1) Adductor canal continuous catheter 2) Single shot Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve block 3) Single shot posterior knee infiltration was performed in all patients using 60 ml mixture of 0.5% Ropivacaine, 10 mg Morphine, 30 mg Ketorolac. Patients randomized into the Dexmedetomidine group (D) received, in addition to the mixture, 1mcg/kg Dexmedetomidine and the Epinephrine (E) group received 200mcg in the mixture. The primary outcome was time to first rescue analgesia as a surrogate for duration of analgesia and secondary outcomes were NRS pain scores up to 24 hours and opioid consumption. The time to first rescue analgesia was not significantly different between Epinephrine and dexmedetomidine groups, Mean and SD 18.45 ± 12.98 hours vs 16.63 ± 11.80 hours with a mean difference of 1.82 hours (95% CI −4.54 to 8.18 hours) and p value of 0.57. Pain scores at 4, 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours were comparable between groups. Mean NRS pain scores Epinephrine vs Dexmedetomidine groups were 1.03 vs 0.80 at 4 hours, 1.48 vs 3.03 at 6 hours, 3.97 vs 4.93 at 12 hours, 5.31 vs 6.18 and 6.59 v 6.12 at 24 hours. Opioid consumption was also not statistically significant between both groups at 6, 12 18, 24 hours (p values 0.18, 0.88, 0.09, 0.64 respectively). Dexmedetomidine does not prolong the duration of knee motor sparing blocks when compared to Epinephrine for total knee arthroplasty. Pain scores and opioid consumption was also comparable in both groups. Further studies using higher dose of dexmedetomidine are warranted

Introduction. Regional anesthesia is commonly utilized to minimize postoperative pain, improve function, and allow earlier rehabilitation following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The adductor canal block (ACB) provides effective analgesia of the anterior knee. However, patients will often experience posterior pain not covered by the ACB requiring supplemental opioid medications. A technique involving infiltration of local anesthetic between the popliteal artery and capsule of knee (IPACK) targets the terminal branches of the sciatic nerve, providing an alternative for controlling posterior knee pain following TKA. Materials and Methods. IRB approval was obtained, a power analysis was performed, and all patients gave informed consent. Eligible patients were those scheduled for an elective unilateral, primary TKA, who were ≥ 18 years old, English speaking, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA PS) classification I-III. Exclusion criteria included contraindication to regional anesthesia or peripheral nerve blocks, allergy to local anesthetics, allergy to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), chronic renal insufficiency with GFR < 60, chronic pain not related to the operative joint, chronic (> 3 month) opioid use, pre-existing peripheral neuropathy involving the operative limb, and body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m. 2. . Patients were randomized into one of two treatment arms: Continuous ACB with IPACK (IPACK Group) block or Continuous ACB with sham subcutaneous saline injection (No IPACK Group). IPACK Group received single injection of 20 mL 0.25% Ropivacaine. Postoperatively, all patients received a standardized multimodal analgesic regimen. The study followed a double-blinded format. Only the anesthesiologist performing the block was aware of randomization status. Following surgery, a blinded medical assessor recorded cumulative opioid consumption, average and worst pain scores, and gait distance. Results. 72 people were enrolled in the study and three withdrew. There were 35 people in the IPACK group and 34 in the NO IPACK group. There was no difference demographically between the groups. In the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU), the average (P=0.0122) and worst (P=0.0168) pain scores at rest were statistically lower in the IPACK group. There was no difference in the pain scores during physical therapy. (P=0.2080) There was no difference in opioid consumption in the PACU (P=0.7928), at 8 hours (P=0.2867), 16 hours (P=0.2387), 24 hours (P=0.7456), or 30 hours (P=0.8029). There was no difference in pain scores on POD 1 in the AM (P=0.4597) or PM (P=0.6273), nor was there any difference in walking distance (P=0.5197). There was also no difference in length of stay in the PACU (P=0.9426) or hospital (P=0.2141) between the two groups. Discussion/Conclusion. Overall, pain was well controlled between the two groups. The IPACK group had lower pain scores at rest in the PACU, but this may not be clinically significant. The routine use of the IPACK is not supported by the results of this study. There may be use of the IPACK block as a rescue block or in patients whom have contraindications to our standard multimodal treatment regimen, or in patients with chronic pain or opioid dependence

Effectiveness of Liposomal Bupivacaine for Post-Operative Pain Control in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomised, Double Blind, Controlled Study. Pericapsular Injection with Free Ropivacaine Provides Equivalent Post-Operative Analgesia as Liposomal Bupivacaine following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Total Knee Arthroplasty in the 21st Century: Why Do They Fail? A Fifteen-Year Analysis of 11,135 Knees. Cryoneurolysis for Temporary Relief of Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Multi-Center, Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomised, Controlled Trial. Pre-Operative Freezing of Sensory Nerves for Post-TKA Pain: Preliminary Results from a Prospective, Randomised, Double-Blind Controlled Trial. Proximalization of the Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy: A Solution for Patella Infera during Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Based on Species of Infecting Organism: A Decision Analysis. Alpha-Defensin Test for Diagnosis of PJI in the Setting of Failed Metal-on-Metal Bearings or Corrosion. Risk of Reinfection after Irrigation and Debridement for Treatment of Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection following TKA. Serum Metal Levels for the Diagnosis of Adverse Local Tissue Reaction Secondary to Corrosion in Metal-on-Polyethylene Bearing Total Hip Arthroplasty. Intra-Articular Injection for Painful Hip OA - A Randomised, Double-Blinded Study. Six-Year Follow-up of Hip Decompression with Concentrated Bone Marrow Aspirate to Treat Femoral Head Osteonecrosis. No Benefit of Computer-Assisted TKA: 10-Year Results of a Prospective Randomised Study

Objection. Multimodal local periarticular injection can be effective for pain management after total knee arthroplasty. We have investigated to get the similar results after total hip arthropasty. Methods. Sixty patients undergoing total hip arthroplasy were divided to two groups. One were with multimodal local periarticular injection(Group M) and the other were with single intraarticular injection Group C, conventional method. We injected a “cocktail” agents into the soft tissue (capsule, synovium, muscle, subcutaneous fat tissue, skin) around the implants. Those were contained Morphinesulfate, Ropivacaine, Adrenaline, Methylpredonisolone, Ketoprofen, and Normal saline. We compared the VAS(at rest and during walking), the duration of the mobilization and active SLR, and any complicaions. Results. Group M was significantly reduced pain level at rest and during mobilization and the duration of active SLR compared to Group C. The duration of the mobilization were similar in both groups. Any complications were not seen in both groups. Conclusion. In total hip arthroplasty patients, multimodal periarticular injection is useful for pain management and early rehabilitation same as total knee arthroplasty

Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is promoted as an effective treatment modality for pain control after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (1). A mixture of drugs is used to provide a multimodal analgesic effect. Previous studies reported that the use of these drugs is safe. After we carefully implemented a LIA study protocol in our practice, concerns raised about patient safety with probably higher infection rates. This forced us to perform an interim analysis after the first 58 cases. 58 patients underwent a unilateral TKA with a standardised LIA protocol (2), which consisted of a mixture of ropivacaine, epinephrine, and triamcinolone acetonide. Complications, knee function and patient satisfaction scores were prospectively recorded during regular outpatient control. Four patients (6.9%) presented with signs of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) within two months after surgery. Baseline characteristics were similar between the infected and non infected group. All infections were treated with debridement and retention, and antimicrobial treatment was started. One patient who suffered an infection died during followup. At two years followup all implants could be retained. Knee function and KSS score were acceptable for the patients who suffered PJI. There is no consensus on the combination of drugs used for LIA. The application of corticosteroids in LIA is reported to be safe (3), but arguable results about the injection of local corticosteroids around knee arthroplasty surgery in the past have raised suspicion in literature (4). Combined with our unacceptable high rate of PJI, we believe that the current body of evidence, with small heterogeneous series, does not support the safe use of corticosteroids in LIA

Introduction. Fast track arthroplasty regimens require preservation of motor power to perform early rehabilitation and ensure early discharge (1). Commonly performed nerve blocks like femoral and Sciatic nerve blocks results in motor weakness thereby interfering with early rehabilitation and may also predispose to patient falls (2, 3). Hence, targeting the terminal branches of the femoral and sciatic nerves around the knee joint under ultrasound is an attractive strategy. The nerve supply of interest for knee analgesia are the terminal branches of the femoral nerve, the genicular branches of the lateral cutaneous nerve of thigh, obturator and sciatic nerves (4). Methods. We modified the performance of the adductor canal block and combined it with US guided posterior pericapsular injection and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block to provide analgesia around the knee joint. The femoral artery is first traced under the sartorius muscle until the origin of descending geniculate artery and the block is performed proximal to its origin. A needle is inserted in-plane between the Sartorius and rectus femoris above the fascia lata and 5 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine (LA) is injected to block the intermediate cutaneous nerve of thigh. The needle is then redirected to enter the fascia of Sartorius to deliver an additional 5ml of LA to cover the medial cutaneous nerve of thigh following which it is further advanced till the needle tip is seen to lie adjacent to the femoral artery under the Sartorius to perform the adductor canal block with an additional 15–20 ml of LA to cover nerve to vastus medialis, saphenous nerve and posterior division of the obturator nerve (Fig 1). The lateral cutaneous nerve of thigh is optionally blocked with 10 ml of LA near the anterior superior iliac spine between the origin of Sartorius and tensor fascia lata (Fig 2). The terminal branches of sciatic nerve to the knee joint is blocked by depositing 25 ml of local anesthetic solution between the popliteal artery and femur bone at the level of femoral epicondyles (Fig 3). Results. The initial experience of the block performed on 10 patients reveal the median (IQR) block duration is noted to be around 20 (±6.5) hours. The median (IQR) pain scores in the first 24 postoperative hours ranged from 0 (±0.5) to 3 (±2.5) at rest and 1.5 (±3.5) to 5.5 (±1) on movement. All patients were successfully mobilized on the morning of the first postoperative day. Conclusion. Motor sparing from the blocks while providing adequate analgesia can be achieved by selectively targeting the sensory innervation of the knee joint. Future comparative studies are needed to evaluate the performance of the block against other modes of analgesia for knee arthroplasty

Objective. We have been using continuous epidural block and local infiltration cocktail for the pain management after TKA since 2005, and good pain control has been acquired with this method. During the past few years we have changed our protocol of postoperative pain management. We have stopped the administration of Loxoprofen starting next morning of the operation, instead Celecoxib was given starting before the operation. We have started mixing steroid to the intraoperative local infiltration cocktail to reduce acute pain as well as swelling. We also have stopped using suction drain, and delayed the timing of CPM start from day 2 to day 3. Methods. This is case control study, and 78 cases of unilateral TKA were investigated for the study. All cases were anesthetized with continuous epidural block with intravenous dosage of phentanyl and propofol. Compositions of local infiltration cocktail are 40ml 0.75% Ropivacaine, 60ml saline, 0.5ml epinephrin. Group1 (n=40) used this cocktail independently, and Group2 (n=38) used this cocktail with addition of 40mg of triamcinolone(Fig.1). Local infiltration cocktail was used during operation, which was injected to the whole joint capsule. In group1 Loxoprofen was given starting next morning, in group 2 Celecoxib was given starting at 7am on the day of operation. In group1 suction tube was left for 2 days, where as in group2 no suction tube was used postoperatively, and continuous epidural block catheter was removed on postoperative day 2 in both groups. CPM was started at postoperative day 2 in group 1 and postoperative day 3 in group 2. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was used to analyze the pain. Circumferences of knee and thigh, as well as ROM of knee joint were measured periodically. Results. Preoperative demographics showed no statistical difference between two groups(Fig. 2). Group 2 showed significantly less pain at 6am next morning postoperatively (Fig.3&4). Group 2 showed significantly lower NRS on motion at postoperative day1, 3, 5 and 7 (Fig.5). Group 2 also showed significantly less swellings of knees and thighs at postoperative day 7 (Fig.6). The ROM of the knee joints at postoperative day 7, 14 and 21 were better in group2(Fig.7). Discussions. Our new method of multimodal pain control is effective. It significantly decreased the pain at 6am next morning postoperatively, which is due to preoperative administration of Celecoxib. The pain on motion during 1 st week was significantly decreased which is probably due to the addition of steroid to the cocktail. Suction drain was not needed, if you use steroid in the cocktail and delay the timing to start CPM. The swelling was significantly reduced by steroid injection and delay in ROM exercise. As a result better ROM at postoperative day 7,14 and 21 were obtained. To view tables/figures, please contact authors directly

Background. Continuous epidural anesthesia or femoral nerve block has decreased postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty to some extent. Although the established efficacy of these pain relief method, some adverse events such as hematoma or muscle weakness are still problematic. Intraoperative local infiltration of analgesia (LIA) has accepted as a promising pain control method after total knee arthroplasty. The safety and efficacy of LIA has been reported, although there are still limited evidence about the effect of LIA on quadriceps function and recovery of range of motion in early post-operative phase. The purpose of this study is to compare the quadriceps function and range of motion after TKA between the LIA with continuous epidural anesthesia and continuous epidural anesthesia alone. Methods. Thirty patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent primary TKA were included in this study. Patients who took anticoagulants were treated continuous epidural anesthesia alone (n=11) and the other patients were treated with LIA with continuous epidural anesthesia (n=19). A single surgeon at our department performed all surgeries. Surgical procedure and rehabilitation process was identical between two groups. Before the implantation, analgesic drugs consisting of 20 ml of 0.75 % ropivacaine and 6.6 mg of dexamethasone were injected into the peri-articular tissues. In each group, fentanyl continuous epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was also used during 48-h post-operative period. Knee flexion and extension angle were evaluated before surgery, post-op day 3, 7, 10 and 14. The quadriceps function was evaluated by quadriceps peak torque at 30° and 60° flexion using VIODEX. The peak torque was recorded preoperatively, day 14 and 3 month after surgery. The difference between two groups was analyzed by Mann Whitney U-test using Prism 6, a statistical software. Results. LIA group showed better postoperative flexion angle until day 7 (Fig. 1). Then the discrepancy became smaller and came to the same degree at day14. The peak torque at 30° and 60° flex is higher in LIA group compared to epidural anesthesia alone. The LIA group showed less peak torque decrease at 2 weeks after surgery than epidural anesthesia alone group (Fig. 2, 3). No adverse events such as were observed in each group. Discussion. This paper demonstrated that LIA in addition to the continuous epidural anesthesia after TKA provides better quadriceps function and early recovery in knee range of motion. In this study we also used continuous epidural anesthesia, thus this study can not evaluate the stand alone LIA effects on quadriceps function and range of motion recovery. Furthermore the patients were not randomly assigned in this study, this might be another limitation of this study. In conclusion, LIA provide better quadriceps function and early recovery of range of motion in addition to the pain relief. To view tables/figures, please contact authors directly

Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) experience significant post-operative pain. We report the results of a new comprehensive patient care plan to manage peri-operative pain, enable early mobilisation and reduce length of hospital stay in TKA. A prospective audit of 1081 patients undergoing primary TKA during 2008 and 2009 was completed. All patients followed a planned programme including pre-operative patient education, pre-emptive analgesia, spinal/epidural anaesthesia with propofol sedation, intra-articular soft tissue wound infiltration, post-operative high volume intermittent ropivacaine boluses with an intra-articular catheter and early mobilisation. The primary outcome measure was the day of discharge from hospital. Secondary outcomes were verbal rating pain scores on movement, time to first mobilisation, nausea and vomiting scores, urinary catheterisation for retention, need for rescue analgesia, maximum flexion at discharge and six weeks post-operatively, and Oxford score improvement. The median day of discharge to home was post-operative day four. Median pain score on mobilisation was three for first post-operative night, day one and two. 35% of patients ambulated on the day of surgery and 95% of patients within 24 hours. 79% patients experienced no nausea or vomiting. Catheterisation rate was 6.9%. Rescue analgesia was required in 5% of cases. Median maximum flexion was 85° on discharge and 93° at six weeks post-operatively. Only 6.6% of patients had a reduction in maximum flexion (loss of more than 5°) at six weeks. Median Oxford score had improved from 42 pre-operatively to 27 at six weeks post-operatively. The infection rate was 0.7% and the DVT and PE rates were 0.6% and 0.5% respectively. This multidisciplinary approach provides satisfactory post-operative analgesia allowing early safe ambulation and discharge from hospital. Anticipated problems did not arise, with early discharge not being detrimental to flexion achieved at six weeks and infection rates not increasing with the use of intra-articular catheters