Aims. To systematically review the predominant complication rates and changes to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation for shoulder instability. Methods. This systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO, involved a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. Key search terms included “allograft”, “shoulder”, “humerus”, and “glenoid”. The review encompassed 37 studies with 456 patients, focusing on primary outcomes like failure rates and secondary outcomes such as PROMs and functional test results. Results. A meta-analysis of primary outcomes across 17 studies revealed a dislocation rate of 5.1% and an increase in reoperation rates from 9.3% to 13.7% post-publication bias adjustment. There was also a noted rise in conversion to total shoulder arthroplasty and incidence of osteoarthritis/osteonecrosis over longer follow-up periods. Patient-reported outcomes and functional tests generally showed improvement, albeit with notable variability across studies. A concerning observation was the consistent presence of allograft resorption, with rates ranging from 33% to 80%. Comparative studies highlighted similar efficacy between distal tibial allografts and Latarjet procedures in most respects, with some differences in specific tests. Conclusion. OCA transplantation presents a promising treatment option for shoulder instability, effectively addressing both glenoid and humeral head defects with favourable patient-reported outcomes. These findings advocate for the inclusion of OCA transplantation in treatment protocols for shoulder instability, while also emphasizing the need for further high-quality, long-term research to better understand the procedure’s efficacy profile. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(7):570–580

Aims. The prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA) associated with instability of the shoulder ranges between 4% and 60%. Articular cartilage is, however, routinely assessed in these patients using radiographs or scans (2D or 3D), with little opportunity to record early signs of cartilage damage. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and localization of chondral lesions and synovial damage in patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery for instablility of the shoulder, in order to classify them and to identify risk factors for the development of glenohumeral OA. Methods. A total of 140 shoulders in 140 patients with a mean age of 28.5 years (15 to 55), who underwent arthroscopic treatment for recurrent glenohumeral instability, were included. The prevalence and distribution of chondral lesions and synovial damage were analyzed and graded into stages according to the division of the humeral head and glenoid into quadrants. The following factors that might affect the prevalence and severity of chondral damage were recorded: sex, dominance, age, age at the time of the first dislocation, number of dislocations, time between the first dislocation and surgery, preoperative sporting activity, Beighton score, type of instability, and joint laxity. Results. A total of 133 patients (95%) had synovial or chondral lesions. At the time of surgery, shoulders were graded as having mild, moderate, and severe OA in 55 (39.2%), 72 (51.4%), and six (4.2%) patients, respectively. A Hill-Sachs lesion and fibrillation affecting the anteroinferior glenoid cartilage were the most common findings. There was a significant positive correlation between the the severity of the development of glenohumeral OA and the patient’s age, their age at the time of the first dislocation, and the number of dislocations (p = 0.004, p = 0.011, and p = 0.031, respectively). Conclusion. Synovial inflammation and chondral damage associated with instability of the shoulder are more prevalent than previously reported. The classification using quadrants gives surgeons more information about the chondral damage, and could explain the pattern of development of glenohumeral OA after stabilization of the shoulder. As the number of dislocations showed a positive correlation with the development of OA, this might be an argument for early stabilization. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(10):1125–1132

Purpose: Shoulder instability is a common problem affecting patients in their most active years resulting in an impact on their quality of life. The WOSI is a validated, disease-specific (shoulder instability) evaluative quality of life measure. It has not been tested for its ability to discriminate between those who require surgical care and those who do not. The purpose of this study is to determine if the WOSI can discriminate between surgical and non-surgical patients and between patients with different types of shoulder instability. Method: Sixty patients with a confirmed diagnosis of shoulder instability were included as cases. Twenty had documented multidirectional instability requiring surgery: Group 1 Surgical MDI – 20 patients had documented recurrent traumatic anterior dislocations requiring surgery: Group 2 Surgical Anterior – 20 patients were first time anterior dislocators who were followed for a minimum one year who had no further recurrences and did not require surgery: Group 3 Non-Surgical First Time Anterior – The cases were compared to 60 age and gender matched control patients with no history of shoulder problems: Group 4 Control – WOSI scores were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA. Results: The WOSI scores were as follows: Group 1 Surgical MDI- mean 30.5 (95% CI 23.1–37.8); Group 2 Surgical Anterior- mean 39.8 (95% CI 33.1–46.5); Group 3 Non-Surgical First time Anterior- mean 76.2 (95% CI 66.4–86.0) and Group 4 Control- mean 96.6 (95% CI 95.8–97.4). Based on the 95% Confidence Intervals, there were statistically significant differences between the two surgical groups (Group 1 Surgical MDI and Group 2 Surgical Anterior) compared to the non-surgical patients (Group 3 Non Surgical First Time Anterior) and the controls (P=0.000). There is a trend to discriminate between the two surgical groups (P=0.079). Conclusion: The WOSI Index clearly discriminates between surgical and non-surgical patients with shoulder instability, and the control population with normal shoulders. There is a trend to discriminate between MDI and recurrent anterior traumatic dislocators

We test the clinical validity and financial implications of the proposed Choosing Wisely statement: “Using ultrasound as a screening test for shoulder instability is inappropriate in people under 30 years of age, unless there is clinical suspicion of a rotator cuff tear.”. A retrospective chart review from a specialist shoulder surgeon's practice over a two-year period recorded 124 patients under the age of 30 referred with shoulder instability. Of these, forty-one had already had ultrasound scans performed prior to specialist review. The scan results and patient files were reviewed to determine the reported findings on the scans and whether these findings were clinically relevant to diagnosis and decision-making. Comparison was made with subsequent MRI scan results. The data, obtained from the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC), recorded the number of cases and costs incurred for ultrasound scans of the shoulder in patients under 30 years old over a 10-year period. There were no cases where the ultrasound scan was considered useful in decision-making. No patient had a full thickness rotator cuff tear. Thirty-nine of the 41 patients subsequently had MRI scans. The cost to the ACC for funding ultrasound scans in patients under 30 has increased over the last decade and exceeded one million dollars in the 2020/2021 financial year. In addition, patients pay a surcharge for this test. The proposed Choosing Wisely statement is valid. This evidence supports that ultrasound is an unnecessary investigation for patients with shoulder instability unless there is clinical suspicion of a rotator cuff tear. Ultrasound also incurs costs to the insurer (ACC) and the patient. We recommend x-rays and, if further imaging is indicated, High Tech Imaging with MRI and sometimes CT scans in these patients

Osteochondral glenoid loss is associated with recurrent shoulder instability. The critical threshold for surgical stabilization is multidimensional and conclusively unknown. The aim of this work was to provide a well- measurable surrogate parameter of an unstable shoulder joint for the frequent anterior-inferior dislocation direction. The shoulder stability ratio (SSR) of 10 paired human cadaveric glenoids was determined in anterior-inferior dislocation direction. Osteochondral defects were simulated by gradually removing osteochondral structures in 5%-stages up to 20% of the intact diameter. The glenoid morphological parameters glenoid depth, concavity gradient, and defect radius were measured at each stage by means of optical motion tracking. Based on these parameters, the osteochondral stability ratio (OSSR) was calculated. Correlation analyses between SSR and all morphological parameters, as well as OSSR were performed. The loss of SSR, concavity gradient, depth and OSSR with increasing defect size was significant (all p<0.001). The loss of SSR strongly correlated with the losses of concavity gradient (PCC = 0.918), of depth (PCC = 0.899), and of OSSR (PCC = 0.949). In contrast, the percentage loss based on intact diameter (defect size) correlated weaker with SSR (PCC=0.687). Small osteochondral defects (≤10%) led to significantly higher SSR decrease in small glenoids (diameter <25mm) compared to large (≥ 25mm) ones (p ≤ 0.009). From a biomechanical perspective, the losses of concavity gradient, glenoid depth and OSSR correlate strong with the loss of SSR. Therefore, especially the loss of glenoidal depth may be considered as a valid and reliable alternative parameter to describe shoulder instability. Furthermore, smaller glenoids are more vulnerable to become unstable in case of small osteochondral loosening. On the other hand, the standardly used percentage defect size based on intact diameter correlates weaker with the magnitude of instability and may therefore not be a valid parameter for judgement of shoulder instability

Glenohumeral joint injuries frequently result in shoulder instability. However, the biomechanical effect of cartilage loss on shoulder stability remains unknown. The aim of the current study was to investigate biomechanically the effect of two severity stages of cartilage loss in different dislocation directions on shoulder stability. Joint dislocation was provoked for 11 human cadaveric glenoids in seven different dislocation directions between 3 o'clock (anterior) to 9 o'clock (posterior) dislocation. Shoulder stability ratio (SSR) and concavity gradient were assessed in intact condition, and after 3 mm and 6 mm simulated cartilage loss. The influence of cartilage loss on SSR and concavity gradient was statistically evaluated. Between intact state and 6 mm cartilage loss, both SSR and concavity gradient decreased significantly in every dislocation direction (p≤0.038), except the concavity gradient in 4 o'clock dislocation direction (p=0.088). Thereby, anterior-inferior dislocation directions were associated with the highest loss of SSR and concavity gradient of up to 59.0% and 49.4%, respectively, being significantly higher for SSR compared to all other dislocation directions (p≤0.04). The correlations between concavity gradient and SSR for pooled dislocation directions were significant for all three conditions of cartilage loss (p<0.001). From a biomechanical perspective, articular cartilage of the glenoid contributes significantly to the concavity gradient, correlating strongly with the associated loss in glenohumeral joint stability. The highest effect of cartilage loss was observed in anterior-inferior dislocation directions, suggesting that surgical intervention should be considered for recurrent shoulder dislocations in the presence of cartilage loss

The primary objective of this study was to establish a safety profile for an all-arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction via iliac crest autograft augmentation for the treatment of shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss. Short-term clinical and radiological outcomes were also evaluated. This study involved a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for 14 patients (male 8, female 6) who were treated for shoulder instability with bone loss using autologous iliac crest bone graft between 2014 and 2018. Of 14 patients, 11 were available for follow-up. The safety profile was established by examining intra-operative and post-operative complications such as neurovascular injuries, infections, major bleeding, and subluxations. Assessment of pre-operative and post-operative Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) index, radiographs, and CT scans comprised the evaluation of clinical and radiological outcomes. A good safety profile was observed. There was no occurrence of intraoperative complications, neurovascular injuries, adverse events, or major bleeding. One patient did develop an infection in the neurovascular injuries, adverse events, or major bleeding. One patient did develop an infection in the treated shoulder post-surgery. There were no subluxations or positive apprehension tests on clinical examination post-operatively. Short-term clinical outcomes were seen to be favorable WOSI scores at the most recent follow-up were significantly higher than pre-operative scores, with a mean increase of 39.6 ± 10.60 (p = 0.00055). The average follow-up for CT scan was 4.66 (SD± 2.33) months, where all patients showed bone graft union. Arthroscopic treatment of shoulder instability with bone loss via autologous iliac crest bone graft is shown to be a safe operative procedure that results in favorable short-term clinical and radiological outcomes. Further investigations must be done to evaluate the longevity of these positive health outcomes

Aims. The Bankart and Latarjet procedures are two of the most common surgical techniques to treat anterior shoulder instability with satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes. However, the outcomes in the adolescent population remain unclear, and there is no information regarding the arthroscopic Latarjet in this population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the arthroscopic Bankart and arthroscopic Latarjet procedures in the management of anterior shoulder instability in adolescents. Methods. We present a retrospective, matched-pair study of teenagers with anterior glenohumeral instability treated with an arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) or an arthroscopic Latarjet (AL) procedure with a minimum two-year follow-up. Preoperative demographic and clinical features, factors associated with dislocation, and complications were collected. Recurrence, defined as dislocation or subluxation, was established as the primary outcome. Clinical and functional outcomes were analyzed using objective (Rowe), and subjective (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)) scores. Additionally, the rate of return to sport was assessed. Results. A total of 51 adolescents were included, of whom 46 (92%) were male, with 17 (33%) in the Latarjet group and 34 (66%) in the Bankart group. The mean age at time of surgery was 18 years (15 to 19). There were no intraoperative complications. At a median follow-up of nine years (IQR 2 to 18), recurrence was observed in 12 patients in the Bankart group (35.3%) and one patient in the Latarjet group (5.9%) (p = 0.023). Satisfactory postoperative outcomes were obtained, with mean Rowe, WOSI, and SANE scores noted at 95 (10 to 100), 325 (25 to 1,975), and 87.5 (10 to 100), respectively. Most patients (29 in the Bankart group (85.3%) and 16 in the Latarjet group (94.1%)) were able to return to sport (p = 0.452). Conclusion. The ABR and AL procedures both obtain satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes in the treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability in adolescents with a low complication rate. However, the ABR is associated with a significantly higher recurrence rate. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(11):1041–1048

Concepts in glenoid tracking and treatment strategies of glenoid bone loss are well established. Initial observations in our practice in Singapore showed few patients with major bone loss requiring glenoid reconstructions. This led us to investigate the incidence of and the extent of bone loss in our patients with shoulder instability. Our study revealed bony Bankart lesions were seen in 46% of our patients but glenoid bone loss measured only 6–10% of the glenoid surface. In the same study we found that arthroscopic labral repair with capsular plication and Mason-Ellen suturing (Hybrid technique) was sufficient to stabilise patients with bipolar bone defects and minor glenoid bone loss. This led us to develop the concept of minor bone loss and a new algorithm. Our algorithm and strategies to deal with major bone loss will also be discussed, and techniques & outcomes of Arthroscopic Bony Bankart repair, Arthroscopic Glenoid Reconstruction and Arthroscopic Remplissage procedures will be shown

Purpose: The confirmation of clinical findings as well as the accurate preoperative evaluation of patients with shoulder instability and rupture of the glenoid labrum. Material-Method: 180 patients with shoulder instability or suspected labral lesions were examined with MR arthrography. Results: The MR arthrography findings were the following: lesions of the labrum, SLAP lesions, redundant articular capsule, lesions of the capsule, lesions of the glenohumeral ligaments. In particular, we present: a) The spectrum of labral ruptures: Bankart lesions, SLAP, HAGL, ALPSA, GLAD lesions), b) various lesions of the labrum: degenerative changes, discoid labrum. In a few cases with MDI the MR arthrography was negative. Fifty (50) patients of these were operated upon. We report the results and compare the MR arthrography findings with those of the operation. SLAP type II lesions are difficult to be distinguished from normal conditions. Conclusions: MR arthrography is a reliable method in the study of shoulder instability and offers significantly in the treatment of this group of patients

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of a biodegradable fixation device (Suretac, Acufex Microsurgical, Inc, Mansfield, Massachusetts) in the treatment of the shoulder instability. Materials & methods: From January 1995 to December 1996, fifteen patients diagnosed as the shoulder instability were treated arthroscopically by using a biodegradable fixation device. All the patients were found to have Bankart lesions, and had the definite histories of trauma. 6 of fifteen patients had suffered from shoulder pain before the trauma, and all of them showed generalized ligamentous laxity sign and grade 2 or 3 positive sulcus sign in examination under the anesthesia, as well as positive apprehension sign, positive fulcrum and relocation test. So they were diagnosed as concomitant TUBS and AMBRI group shoulder instability. The rest of 9 out of fifteen patients were diagnosed as TUBS group shoulder instability. There were twelve males and three females, and their mean age was twenty five years (range: 16 to 47). In all the patients, the Bankart lesions were repaired or reconstructed by using at least 2 Suretac devices after extensive, sufficient superior-medial shift of the anterior-inferior glenohumeral capsuloligamentous complexes(GHLC) down to the 6 o¡Çclock positions of the glenoid rim. As for the patients with concomitant TUBS and AMBRI group shoulder instability, we did not only the plication of the anterior capsule for AMBRI component, but also the repair of Bankart lesion for TUBS component. Follow-up time averaged five years and six months (range: 4 years 5 months to 6 years 3 months). Results: One patient (one shoulder) demonstracted persistent apprehension associated with popping sensation because of injury with fracture of the anterior glenoid rim two year and six months after the operation. A subsequent reconstruction was performed. The recurrence rate was 6.7%. But there were no other complications including any pain, and stiffness. Conclusion: It is my impression that an arthroscopic Bankart repair or reconstruction by using Suretac devices after extensive, sufficient superior-medial shift of the anterior-inferior GHLC and if needed, plication of the anterior capsule played a role on the treatment of the shoulder instability

Military patients have high functional requirements of the upper limb and may have lower pre-operative PROM scores than civilian patients i.e. their function is high when benchmarked, but still insufficient to perform their military role thereby mandating surgery. Our aim was to compare the pre-operative Oxford Shoulder Instability Scores in military and civilian patients undergoing shoulder stabilisation surgery. We undertook a prospective, blinded cohort-controlled study (OCEBM Level 3b). The null hypothesis was that there was no difference in the Oxford Shoulder Instability Scores between military and civilian groups. A power calculation showed that 40 patients were required in each group to give 95% power with 5% significance. A clinical database (iParrot, ByResults Ltd., Oxford, UK) was interrogated for consecutive patients undergoing shoulder stabilisation surgery at a single centre. The senior author - blinded to the outcome score - matched patients according to age, gender and diagnosis. Statistical analysis showed the data to be normally distributed so a paired samples t-test was used to compare the two groups. 110 patients were required to provide a matched cohort of 80 patients. There were 70 males and 10 females. Age at the time of surgery was 16-19yrs (n=6); 20-24yrs (n=28); 25-29 (n=16); 30-34(n=12); 35-49(n=12); 40-44(n=6). 72 patients (90%) had polar group one and 8 patients (10%) had polar group two instability. The mean Oxford Shoulder Instability Score in the civilian group was 17 and the in military group was 18. There was no statistical difference between the two groups (p=0.395). This study supports the use the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score to assess military patients with shoulder instability

We have developed a 12-item questionnaire for completion by patients presenting with shoulder instability. A prospective study of 92 patients was undertaken involving two assessments, approximately six months apart, performed in an outpatient department. Each patient completed the new questionnaire and the SF36 form. An orthopaedic surgeon completed the Constant shoulder score and the Rowe assessment. The new questionnaire and the Rowe clinical score each achieved a large standardised effect size (≥0.8) and compared favourably with relevant items on the SF36. By contrast, the Constant score barely registered any effect, confirming that it may be relatively insensitive to changes in clinical status for this particular condition. The questionnaire provides a measurement of outcome for shoulder instability which is short, practical, reliable, valid and sensitive to changes of clinical importance

Purpose of this study is to examine the role of MRI arthrography in chronic cases of shoulder instability. Shoulder arthroscopy was elected as standard record of diagnosis. Patients & Method: We evaluated 155 shoulder arthroscopies in 153 cases of recurrent shoulder instability from Sept 99 to Feb 03. Each patient suffered at least 2 true dislocations. Pre-op, we performed MRI scan in 82 of them while, 15 other cases were evaluated more invasively with MRI arthrography, with anterior portal infusion technique. Results were analyzed blindly from 2 radiologists with particular experience in MRI musculoskeletal cases and were compared to arthroscopic findings. Results: Bankart lesion was diagnosed in all cases with MRI arthrography (sensitivity 100%), SLAP lesion had sensitivity 50% and specificity 100% while, rotator cuff pathology was diagnosed in 6 out of 7 cases. There were also 4 false positive cases in rotator cuff pathology. Sensitivity for superior and inferior gleno-humeral ligament was 100% and 94% respectively, without any true negative findings in both of them. Sensitivity and specificity for middle glenohumeral ligament was 89% and 60% respectively. In cases where we recognized loose anterior capsule pathology during arthroscopy, the radiologists were not able to detect these lesions from a functional aspect. Despite the fact, that all Hill Sachs lesions were identified through MRI arthrography it was also possible to be detected functionally. Conclusions; MRI arthrography is a reliable tool in recurrent shoulder instability while is an invasive method because of the infusion material. Anterior glenohumeral instability is not always a Bankart lesion but gleno-humeral ligaments pathology too that, can easily be detected during arthroscopy which may be the therapeutic solution at the same time

MRI arthography (MRA) is commonly used in the investigation of shoulder instability. However many surgeons are now using CT arthography (CTA) as their primary radiological investigative modality. They argue that CTA is cheaper, and give satisfactory soft tissue images in the “soft tissue window” mode. They believe that CTA give superior images when looking at bone loss and bony defects, and as such is more useful in deciding whether a patient requires an open procedure or not. In this study we aimed to compare the results of MRA and CTA in the investigation of shoulder instability. We reviewed the operative and arthographic findings in all patients who had surgery for shoulder instability in our unit over a 4 year period. We compared the results of the arthograms with the definitive findings found at the time of surgery. All arthograms were performed by standard techniques and were reported by musculoskeletal radiology consultants. All surgery was performed by experienced consultant shoulder surgeons. In total 48 CTAs and 50 MRAs were performed. We found that there was no significant difference between the two wrt sensitivity (p=0.1) and specificity (p=0.4) when looking at labral pathology. However CTA was more sensitive at picking up bony lesions (p< 0.05). This study supports the view that CT arthography is the superior radiological modality in identifying pathology when investigating patients with shoulder instability. It is cheaper and better tolerated by patients than MRA and gives useful information on whether a patient needs an open or arthroscopic stabilisation procedure

Introduction and Objectives: According to the literature, the prevalence of osteoarthritis in shoulder instability is about 4 to 31%. In these studies we used imaging techniques with little sensitivity to early alterations of cartilage. The aim of this study is to arthroscopically assess the prevalence and distribution of osteoarthritis in shoulder instability and analyze associated risk factors. Materials and Methods: In a group of 64 patients (mean 28.9 years of age, range 15–55) we arthroscopically assessed the degree and distribution of glenohumeral arthritis at the time of surgical stabilization classifying them into 3 groups according to severity. We determined the correlation of the degree of osteoarthritis (Pearson coefficient) with sex, dominance, age, age at the first episode, preoperative sports activities, degree of instability, laxness and number of dislocations and subluxations. Results: 63 patients (98.5%) had chondral or synovial lesions of a degree of severity categorized as slight, moderate or severe in 26 (40.6%), 35 (54.7%) and 3 (4.7%) patients respectively. The most frequent findings were Hill-Sachs type lesions and anteroinferior glenoid fibrillation. We found a significant correlation between degree of severity of the arthritis (p< 0.05) and the age of the patient, age at the first dislocation and number of dislocations. Discussion and Conclusions: The prevalence of osteoarthritis in shoulder instability is greater than has been described. The fact that there is a positive correlation between the number of dislocations suffered and the severity of the arthritis could be a reason for carrying out early stabilization in these patients

We report our experience with glenohumeral arthrodesis as a salvage procedure for epilepsy-related recurrent shoulder instability. A total of six patients with epilepsy underwent shoulder fusion for recurrent instability and were followed up for a mean of 39 months (12 to 79). The mean age at the time of surgery was 31 years (22 to 38). Arthrodesis was performed after a mean of four previous stabilisation attempts (0 to 11) in all but one patient in whom the procedure was used as a primary treatment. All patients achieved bony union, with a mean time to fusion of 2.8 months (2 to 7). There were no cases of re-dislocation. One revision was undertaken for loosening of the metalwork, and then healed satisfactorily. An increase was noted in the mean subjective shoulder value, which improved from 37 (5 to 50) pre-operatively to 42 (20 to 70) post-operatively although it decreased in two patients. The mean Oxford shoulder instability score improved from 13 pre-operatively (7 to 21) to 24 post-operatively (13 to 36). In our series, glenohumeral arthrodesis eliminated recurrent instability and improved functional outcome. Fusion surgery should therefore be considered in this patient population. However, since the majority of patients are young and active, they should be comprehensively counselled pre-operatively given the functional deficit that results from the procedure. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1525–9

The aim of this study was to review the results of surgery on patients who had recurrent instabilty of the shoulder associated with significant bone loss who were treated by autogenous iliac crest tricortical grafts. Ten consecutive patients were reviewed. All had significant loss of glenoid bone stock as assessed by CT scan. All were treated by use of tricortical bone graft harvested from the iliac crest and fashioned to reconstitute the anterior glenoid defect. This was fixed intra-articularly with cannulated screws. The antero-inferior capsule was then repaired to this new “glenoid rim”. All patients had a standard rehabilitation regime. All patients had an assessment of the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OIS) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES) before and after the operation. At an average follow-up of 26 months, the mean OIS had improved from 38.3 to 22.3 and the mean ASES had increased from 40.5 to 86.6. None had had a recurrent dislocation. The use of autogenous iliac crest bone graft to treat recurrent shoulder instability associated with significant glenoid bone loss is an effective treatment for this difficult condition

Purpose of the study: A systematic isokinetic assessment of both shoulders was performed in 103 men with shoulder instability subsequent to several anterior or antero-inferior trauma-induced dislocations. The assessment was part of the preoperative workup which included a clinical examination and an imaging protocol (standard x-rays + tomographies as needed). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the force of the rotator muscles of the injured shoulder and to compare the findings with those obtained for the healthy shoulder. The objective was to determine the impact of instability on muscle balance in the injured shoulder. Material and methods: This study concerned 103 men, mean age 24.8 years. The injured shoulder was dominant for 65 and non-dominant for 38. Time from the first episode of instability and the test was at least 2 months. One operator performed all tests using a unique dynamometer: Cybex Norm operating in concentric mode at 60 to 180/s. Results: Overall, the results for 103 subjects at 60/s did not reveal any difference between the injured and the healthy side for internal rotators. There was a 2% deficit for the external rotators. At 180/s, the deficit was 5% for the internal rotators and 3% for the external rotators. For the injured dominant shoulders (n=65 subjects): at 60/s, there was no deficit; at 180/s, the deficit was 2% for internal rotators and 1% for internal rotators. For the injured non-dominant shoulders (n=38 subjects: the deficit was less than 10% compared with the healthy side for both 60/s and 180/s. Conclusion: No significant deficit in internal or external rotation power was observed in the injured shoulder. Inclusion of an isokinetic test as a systematic part of the preoperative work-up for post-trauma instability in male subjects would not be warranted. The present findings can be used as control data for research involving non-trauma-induced uni- or multidirectional shoulder instability

To evaluate humeral and glenoid bone loss in patients surgically treated for shoulder instability as factors of recurrence. During the period 2000–2008, 114 patients (103 men and 11 women) with mean age of 28 yrs underwent arthroscopic treatment for shoulder instability by the same surgeon. Mean age of the 1st shoulder dislocation was 20,89 yo and the average number of dislocations per patient was 17,14. Glenoid bone loss was found in all patients (16 Large, 59 Medium, 29 Small), as well as Hill Sachs lesions (66 Large, 23 Medium, 8 Small) or both. Thirteen (13) patients had an “inverted pear” glenoid shape. Seventy five (75) were into sports and for 57 (76%) of them this involved Overhead/Contact activities. Also 20 patients presented joint hypermobility. Complete follow up existed for 92 patients and it ranged from 4–108 months (Mean=44). The recurrence of instability and the functional outcome were evaluated post-op using the Rowe Zarins Score. Recurrence of instability was noted in 5 patients (4,38%). All of them presented Hill Sachs lesions and glenoid bone loss (2 Large, 2 Medium, 1 Small) but without an “inverted pear” glenoid shape or joint hypermobility. All 5 of them were into Overhead/Contact sports activities (2 Professional: Mean=15hr/w and 3 Amateur: Mean=2,5hr/w). The post op Rowe Zarins Score ranged from 80–100 (Mean=95,11). From the evaluation of our data, it seems that humeral and glenoid bone loss do not significantly contribute to the recurrence of arthroscopically treated shoulder instability