The function of the upper extremity is highly dependent on correlated motion of the shoulder. The shoulder can be affected by several diseases. The most common are: rotator cuff tear (RCT), shoulder instability, shoulder osteoarthritis and fractures. Rotator cuff disease is a common disorder. It has a high prevalence rate, causing high direct and indirect costs. The appropriate treatment for RCT is debated. The American Academy Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines state that surgical repair is an option for patients with chronic, symptomatic full-thickness RCT, but the quality of evidence is unconvincing. Thus, the AAOS recommendations are inconclusive. We are performing a randomized controlled trial to compare surgical and conservative treatment of RCT, in term of functional outcomes, rotator cuff integrity, muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration. Shoulder instability occurs when the head of the upper arm bone is forced out of the shoulder socket. Shoulder instabilities have been classified according to the etiology, the direction of instability, or on combinations thereof. The Thomas and Matsen classification, which is currently the most commonly utilized classification, divides shoulder instability events into the traumatic, unidirectional, Bankart lesion, and surgery (TUBS) and the atraumatic, multidirectional, bilateral, rehabilitation, and capsular shift (AMBRI) categories. The acquired instability overstress surgery (AIOS) category was then added. Surgical procedures for shoulder instability includes arthroscopic capsuloplasty, remplissage, bone block procedure or Latarjet procedure. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) represents a good solution for the management of patients with osteoarthritis or fracture of the proximal humerus, with associated severe osteoporosis and RC dysfunction

Introduction. Assessment of the humeral head translation with respect to the glenoid joint, termed humeral head migration (HHM), is crucial in total shoulder arthroplasty pre-operative planning. Its assessment informs current classification systems for shoulder osteoarthritis as well as the evaluation of surgical correction. In current clinical practice, HHM assessment relies on computed-tomography (CT) imaging. However, the associated supine position might undermine its functional relevance as it does not reflect the weight-bearing condition with active muscle engagement associated with the upright standing position of most daily activities. Therefore, we assessed to what extent HHM in a supine position is associated with HHM in a range of functional arm positions. Method. 26 shoulder osteoarthritis patients and 12 healthy volunteers were recruited. 3D shapes of the humerus and scapula were reconstructed from their respective CT scans using an image processing software. 3. , and their CT-scan-based HHMs were measured. Furthermore, all subjects underwent low-dose biplanar radiography . 4. in four quasi-static functional arm positions while standing: relaxed standing, followed by 45 degrees of shoulder extension, flexion, and abduction. Using a previously validated method implemented in the programming platforms. 5. , 3D shapes were registered to the pairs of biplanar images for each arm position and the corresponding functional HHM was measured. Bivariate correlations were assessed between the CT-based HHM and each functional arm position. Result. HHM in 45 degrees of flexion and extension both showed significant and strong correlations (r>0.66 and P<0.01) with HHM assessed in the supine position. However, such a high correlation was not found for relaxed standing and 45 abduction. Conclusion. Although HHM in a supine position correlates with HHM in 45-degree extension and flexion, it is poorly associated with the HHM in abduction and relaxed standing. These results may suggest the inclusion of more functionally-relevant patient positioning toward better-informed shoulder arthroplasty planning. Acknowledgement. Funding from PRosPERos-II Project