The aim was to examine the descriptive epidemiology of
Purpose.
Aim. With the link between obesity and
Purpose. This report compares midterm results of open neck osteoplasty +
neck osteotomy vs arthroscopic osteoplasty for severe
Purpose. We share our experience in management of failed in-situ pinning in severe unstable
Introduction. We report 3 cases from different centres of infantile tibia vara in which the deformity was due to slippage of the proximal tibial epiphysis on the metaphysis; the aim of this study was to define the features of this previously unreported condition, and their implications for management. Method. Three cases of tibia vara secondary to atraumatic slippage of the upper tibial epiphysis on the metaphysis were identified from three different centres. The case notes and imaging studies were retrospectively reviewed to distinguish common clinical and radiographic features. Results. There were one male and two females, all of non-Caucasian origin, (age 3–7 years). All patients' weights were above the 97th centile for age. In all cases there was an infero-medial subluxation of the tibial epiphysis over a dome shaped proximal tibial metaphysis, with disruption of continuity between their lateral borders. The height of the medial tibial plateau was preserved in all cases. New bone formation suggests this is a chronic process. The evolution of one case indicates that pathogenesis is shared with infantile Blount's disease. A gradual deformity correction was performed in all cases using circular external fixation, with the proximal ring secured to both the proximal epiphysis and metaphysis. Conclusion.
This study analysed the clinical and radiological outcome of
anatomical reduction of a moderate or severe stable slipped capital
femoral epiphysis (SCFE) treated by subcapital osteotomy (a modified
Dunn osteotomy) through the surgical approach described by Ganz. We prospectively studied 31 patients (32 hips; 16 females and
five males; mean age 14.3 years) with SCFE. On the Southwick classification,
ten were of moderate severity (head-shaft angle >
30° to 60°) and
22 were severe (head-shaft angle >
60°). Each underwent open reduction
and internal fixation using an intracapsular osteotomy through the
physeal growth plate after safe surgical hip dislocation. Unlike
the conventional procedure, 25 hips did not need an osteotomy of
the apophysis of the great trochanter and were managed using an
extended retinacular posterior flap. Aims
Patients and Methods
Controversy remains whether the contralateral
hip should be fixed in patients presenting with unilateral slipped capital
femoral epiphysis (SCFE). This retrospective study compares the
outcomes and cost of those patients who had prophylactic fixation
with those who did not. Between January 2000 and December 2010 a total of 50 patients
underwent unilateral fixation and 36 had prophylactic fixation of
the contralateral hip. There were 54 males and 32 females with a
mean age of 12.3 years (9 to 16). The rate of a subsequent slip
without prophylactic fixation was 46%. The risk of complications
was greater, the generic health measures (Short Form-12 physical
(p <
0.001) and mental (p = 0.004) summary scores) were worse.
Radiographic cam lesions in patients presenting with unilateral
SCFE were only seen in patients who did not have prophylactic fixation.
Furthermore, prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip was
found to be a cost-effective procedure, with a cost per quality
adjusted life year gained of £1431 at the time of last follow-up. Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip is a cost-effective
operation that limits the morbidity from the complications of a
further slip, and the diminished functional outcome associated with
unilateral fixation. Cite this article:
We describe three cases of infantile tibia vara
resulting from an atraumatic slip of the proximal tibial epiphysis
upon the metaphysis. There appears to be an association between
this condition and severe obesity. Radiologically, the condition
is characterised by a dome-shaped metaphysis, an open growth plate
and disruption of the continuity between the lateral borders of
the epiphysis and metaphysis, with inferomedial translation of the
proximal tibial epiphysis. All patients were treated by realignment
of the proximal tibia by distraction osteogenesis with an external
circulator fixator, and it is suggested that this is the optimal
method for correction of this complex deformity. There are differences
in the radiological features and management between conventional
infantile Blount’s disease and this ‘slipped upper tibial epiphysis’
variant.
Fixation by a single screw is considered the current treatment of choice for a slipped capital femoral epiphysis. This approach promotes premature physeal closure. The use of a modified, standard, single, cannulated screw designed to maintain epiphyseal fixation without causing premature closure of the physis was reviewed in ten patients. The nine boys and one girl aged between 10.6 and 12.6 years with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), were markedly skeletally immature (Tanner stage I, bone age 10 to 12.6 years). Clinical and radiological review at a mean follow-up of 44.3 months (36 to 76) showed no difference in the time to physeal closure between the involved and uninvolved side. Measurement of epiphyseal and physeal development showed continued growth and remodelling in all patients. Use of this device provided epiphyseal stability and maintained the capacity for physeal recovery and growth following treatment for both unstable and stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
The purpose of this study was to determine the oblique plane deformity in slipped upper femoral epiphysis. A retrospective radiographic review was undertaken in patients admitted with a slipped upper femoral epiphysis between March 2008 and October 2010. Patients in whom a CT scan had been performed in addition to plain radiographs were assessed further. Angular deformity in the coronal and sagittal planes were measured by the angle formed between the femoral neck and a line perpendicular to the physis on the AP pelvic radiograph and the axial CT scan respectively. The magnitude and direction of the resultant deformity was defined in the oblique plane. Additional demographic data (gender, age, side, procedure and complications) was collected. Seven girls, average age of 12 (range 10 – 13) and 6 boys, average age of 13 (range 10 – 15) were identified. The slip was bilateral in 2, left sided in 6 and right sided in 5 cases. Two patients were pinned in situ, 8 had surgical dislocation performed to facilitate reduction prior to pinning and 3 patients had secondary procedures performed following in situ pinning. The average angulation in the oblique posteroinferior plane (25 degrees) was less than in the coronal (30 degrees) and the sagittal planes (62 degrees). The average magnitude was 67mm (range 31 – 88). CT is useful adjunct particularly when a frog legged lateral view is not possible because of pain or the fear of further displacement. Determination of the deformity in the oblique plane may aid in positioning of the screw during in situ pinning and may be helpful in identifying patients in whom pinning maybe difficult.
Debate remains over the optimal treatment for severe unstable SCFE. AVN is the principle problem; current thinking suggests this can be minimized by emergent reduction and fixation within 24 hours. If emergent treatment is not possible, open osteotomy with a variable delay of 10–21 days has been advocated. We present our experience of delayed intracapsular cuneiform osteotomy (ICO) SCFE cases were identified through ICD-10 coding and theatre records. Unstable slips were identified and reviewed retrospectively. When ICO was performed, the hip was accessed via anterior approach without hip dislocation. A cuneiform shortening osteotomy of the neck with physeal excision was undertaken. The epiphysis was carefully reduced and stabilized with a single screw.Aim
Methods
Several authors have reported complications from screw removal after treatment of slipped upper femoral epiphysis by single screw fixation, and have attributed these to poor screw design. We have developed a simple and reliable method of screw removal which uses a cannulated 8.0 mm end-threaded cancellous screw (Smith &
Nephew Richards Medical, Memphis, Tennessee) and a specially designed cannulated trephine. The method has been successful, with minimal complications, and a limited surgical exposure.
The decision to undertake prophylactic pinning to prevent contralateral slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) remains controversial; we hypothesised that the grade of initial SUFE could predict the grade of a second SUFE and risk of poor outcome. We retrospectively reviewed radiographs of all children who presented to Alder Hey with a new diagnosis of SUFE between 2007–2014. Of those who developed a contralateral SUFE, grade of first and second SUFE was determined radio-graphically using %
slip and Southwick angle on frog lateral radiograph.Purpose
Method
This purpose of this study was to investigate whether prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in unilateral slipped upper femoral epiphysis affects subsequent femoral morphology. To determine the effect of prophylactic pinning on growth we compared contralateral hip radiographs of 24 proximal femora prophylactically pinned with 26 cases observed, in a cohort of patients with unilateral SUFE. Validated measurements were used to determine hip morphology; the articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD) and the ratio of the trochanteric-trochanteric distance (TTD) to articulo-trochanteric distance (TTD:ATD) in addition to direct measurement of the femoral neck length. Post-operative radiographs were compared to radiographs taken at a 12–84 months follow-up. Comparing pinned and unpinned hips the neck length was shorter (mean 5.1 mm vs 11.1 mm) and the ATD was lower (p=0.048). The difference between initial and final radiograph TTD:ATD ratio for each case was calculated. The average was 0.63 in the prophylactically pinned group and 0.25 in the unpinned group (p=0.07). When hips of the same patient were compared on final radiographs, there was a smaller difference in TTD:ATD between the two sides when the patient had been prophylactically pinned (0.7) as opposed to observed (1.47). This was not statistically significant (p=0.14). Universal prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip in slipped upper femoral epiphysis is controversial and alteration of the proximal femoral morphology is one reason for this. Our results show that prophylactic pinning does not stop growth but does alter subsequent proximal femoral morphology by causing a degree of coxa vara and breva. Some loss of growth in the prophylactically pinned hip contributes to reduction in leg length inequality at skeletal maturity which is advantageous. No iatrogenic complications were observed with single cannulated screw fixation. Prophylactic pinning prevents the potential catastrophe of a subsequent slip, is safe and the effect on growth is, if anything, beneficial. Level of evidence: III
We reviewed the long-term results of the treatment of slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) using realignment procedures in 36 patients (37 hips) at an average follow-up of 33.8 years (26 to 42). There were serious short-term complications in seven of the 22 hips treated by subcapital osteotomy, three of the 11 hips treated by intertrochanteric osteotomy and three of the four hips treated by manipulative reduction. At re-examination, the clinical and radiological results were excellent or good in 41% of the hips treated by subcapital osteotomy, in 36% treated by intertrochanteric osteotomy and in none treated by manipulative reduction. In all, seven hips (19%) had had arthrodesis or total hip replacement. The natural history of SUFE was probably not improved by any of the treatments used in our study. We therefore discourage the use of subcapital and intertrochanteric osteotomy as well as manipulative reduction in the primary treatment of chronic SUFE.
The aim was to assess contemporary management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) by surveying members of the British Society of Children's Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS). A questionnaire with 5 case vignettes was used. Two questions examined the timing of surgery for an acute unstable SCFE in a child presenting at 6 hours and at 48 hours after start of symptoms. Two further questions explored the preferred method of fixation in mild and severe stable SCFE. The final question examined the management of the contralateral normal hip. Responses were entered into an Excel spreadsheet and the data w analysed using a chi-squared test. The response rate was 56% (110/196). 88.2% (97/110) responded that if a child presented with an acute unstable SCFE within 6 hours, they would treat it within 24 hours of presentation, compared with 40.9% (45/110) for one presenting 48 hours after the onset of symptoms (P<0.0001). 52.6% (58/110) of surveyed BSCOS members would offer surgery for an unstable SCFE between 1 and 7 days after onset of symptoms. Single screw fixation in situ was advocated by 96.4% (106/110) and 70.9% (78/110) while corrective osteotomy was preferred by 1.8% (2/110) and 26.4% (29/110) of respondents for the mild and the severe stable slips respectively (P<0.0001). Surgeons preferring osteotomy are more likely to perform an intracapsular technique. Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral normal hip was performed by 27.3% (30/110) of participants. There are significant differences in opinions between BSCOS members as to the optimal management of SCFE in children. This reflects the variable recommendations and quality in the current scientific literature. Further research is therefore required to determine best practice and enable consensus to be reached.
Audit of the outcome of subcapital osteotomy for a series of cases of severe unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis. 57 cases of unstable severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis were operated on by a single surgeon between 2000 and 2011. The procedure was performed through the anterior abductor sparing approach. Patients have been followed up prospectively and the results are presented at average follow up is 6.4 years with a minimum of 18 month follow to include all risks of avn.Aim:
Method:
We have reviewed the complication rate over a ten year period for removal of screws placed for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) and have surveyed the views of orthopaedic surgeons with an adult hip practice in Scotland on leaving the metalwork in situ. Whilst screw removal is favoured by many orthopaedic surgeons, a recent review of the literature reported that the complication rate for removal of implants placed for SCFE was 34%. Between 1998 and 2007 84 patients had insertion of screws for SCFE. Of these 54 patients had screws removed, 51 of these records were available. The median duration between insertion and removal of screws was 2 yrs 7 months. Of the 51 children, overall five (9.8%) had complications - three (5.9%) major and two (3.9%) minor. Two screws could not be removed; one patient sustained a fracture after screw removal and two developed an infection. We assessed the attitudes of adult hip surgeons on this topic using an electronic questionnaire which was completed by 29 out of 40 recipients. 78.6% of respondents support routine removal and 21.4% favour leaving the screw permanently in place. 82.2% had needed to remove metalwork from a hip requiring arthroplasty in a patient whose metalwork was inserted during childhood; and described their experience of this including the complications encountered. We have identified a lower complication rate following screw removal inserted for SCFE than in published series. Most adult hip surgeons support routine removal once the physis is closed but studies regarding the long-term outcome of retained orthopaedic implants are needed since even with this lower complication rate the question of routine removal remains unclear.