Introduction. This study aims to investigate the relationship between ulnar fixation and postoperative satisfaction among patients with distal radius fractures accompanied by ulna styloid fractures, with a particular focus on how sociodemographic factors influence outcomes. Method. A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 120 patients aged 26-53 who underwent surgical treatment for distal radius fractures with concomitant ulna styloid fractures between January 2018 and December 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether ulnar fixation was performed. Sociodemographic data, including age, gender, socioeconomic status, education level, and occupation, were collected. All patients underwent similar physical therapy protocols in the postoperative period, and no complications were observed in any patient. Postoperative satisfaction was assessed using the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores at 6 and 12 months post-surgery. Statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate the influence of ulnar fixation and sociodemographic factors on patient satisfaction. Result. Patients who underwent ulnar fixation (n=60) reported significantly higher satisfaction levels compared to those who did not (n=60), as evidenced by lower PRWE and DASH scores (p < 0.05). Age, gender, and socioeconomic status were significant predictors of postoperative satisfaction. Younger patients, females, and those with higher socioeconomic status exhibited greater improvements in functional outcomes and satisfaction. However, education level and occupation did not significantly influence satisfaction scores. Conclusion. Ulnar fixation in the surgical treatment of distal radius fractures accompanied by ulna styloid fractures is associated with improved postoperative satisfaction. Sociodemographic factors, particularly age, gender, and socioeconomic status, play a crucial role in patient-reported outcomes. Tailoring postoperative care to address these sociodemographic differences may enhance overall patient satisfaction and recovery

Introduction. We used patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) to evaluate qualitative and societal outcomes of trauma. Methods. We collected PROMs data between Sept 2013 and March 2015 for 92 patients with injury severity score (ISS) greater than 9. We enquired regarding return to work, income and socioeconomic status, dignity and satisfaction and the EQ-5D questionnaire. Results. Return to work. Of patients working at admission 15/58(26%) anticipated returning to work within 14 days of discharge. Work plans at discharge did not correlate with ISS scores overall (r=−0.05, ns), or when stratified by working group. Increased physicality of work showed a trend towards poorer return to work outcomes (not significant in Spearman's rank analysis: r= 0.14, p= 0.32). Income and socioeconomic status: No significant difference was demonstrated between the comparative incomes of patients with the best and worst return to work outcomes (ANOVA n=61, t=0.63, ns). Lowest quartile earners (n=19) were more likely to complete the open questions (79%) than higher income patients (62%). Dignity and satisfaction: Prominent positive themes were: care, staff, professionalism, and communication. Prominent negative themes were: food, ward response time, and communication. %). Patients ‘mostly’ or ‘always’ satisfied with their care did not have significantly different incomes (ANOVA, t=0.13, ns). EQ-5D: Self-rated health status correlated with perceived likelihood of return to work (r=0.25, p=0.0395). Correlation was demonstrated between EQ-5D scores and perceived dignity preservation (r=0.38, p=0.0004), and overall satisfaction (r=0.46, p< 0.0001). There was no correlation between EQ-5D and ISS score. Conclusion. EQ5D correlated with work plans, dignity, and satisfaction. Planned return to work did not correlate with ISS score or socioeconomic status. Unlike previous studies we demonstrated that lower socioeconomic groups have best engagement with PROMS. This study highlighted the value of qualitative PROMS analysis in leading patient-driven improvements in trauma care