Aims. Body exhaust
We have investigated whether the use of laminar-flow theatres and space
The use of exhaust
The use of exhaust
Introduction. Surgical spacesuits are in widespread use. Only one previous study (JBJS 1998) has assessed the quality of the environment within the space
We randomly allocated 50 total knee replacements to scrub teams wearing body-exhaust
Soon, UK surgeons will need to undergo regular revalidation and relicensing. As a part of this process they will need to collect accurate outcomes data. However, a lack of standardisation has led to numerous generic and disease specific outcome tools being available with increasing complexity in their administration and interpretation. In research and university settings these tools are easily administered, but in a busy general spinal practice with limited human and time resources, it may not be possible to use them reliably and consistently. Web-based systems remove some of these problems, but data-input can be time consuming. This study evaluates the utility of a subjective Patient Satisfaction Evaluation Questionnaire (PSE) by comparing it to well-known outcome tools, the Oswestry disability Index (ODI) and the Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS). The PSE (modified Odom’s Criteria) evaluates pain, the willingness to undergo surgery again in similar circumstances, the likelihood of recommending the operation undergone to a friend or family member and satisfaction with the process of care. Pain relief is ranked as “complete”, “good but not complete”, “little” or “no pain relief/pain worse than before surgery”. The responses are scored with three points allocated to complete relief of pain, down to none for no relief. The other questions score one for a positive and zero for a negative response. The maximum score is six. Four, five or six points count as success as long as the pain component is two or three. Nought to three, counts as failure, as does a score of four when pain is rated as “poor”. The ODI, LBOS and PSE are not directly numerically comparable, but the results of them all can be grouped into “Success” and “Failure” which gives a basis for comparison of the tools. 150 consecutive patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery completed the three questionnaires independently of the treating surgeon. The scores were subjected to regression analysis (R square) and a Pearson’s correlation. Feedback was sought from the patients regarding the “user friendliness” of the questionnaires. Results showed a good correlation between the ODI and LBOS with a Pearson’s value and R Square (RSQ) value of 0.86 and 0.75 respectively. The PSE compared to the ODI showed a Pearson’s value of 0.86 and RSQ of 0.74. The LBOS and PSE comparison had a Pearson’s value of 0.78 and RSQ of 0.61. The results show that the PSE in the form used correlates well with results from the ODI and LBOS. However, the patient feedback data indicated that the PSE was the most user friendly of the three tools. The PSE was found to be a useful and user friendly tool, correlating well with recognised outcome measures, being easy to administer, document and interpret. If surgeons with limited resources cannot reliably use a more rigorous outcome tool, using the PSE should provide enough data to meet the standards that are likely to be required for revalidation and relicensing.
This study in UCA (ultra clean air) during TKR (total knee replacement) quantified wound bacterial counts, assessed the relationship to air counts and compared BES (body exhaust suits) with Rotecno occlusive clothing. Fifty TKR were randomly allocated to scrub teams wearing BES or Rotecno occlusive clothing. Air bacterial counting within 30cm of a wound is the established methodology to define air cleanliness. Reliable wound bacterial counting should be a more precise index of infection risk however, to date, there is no established accurate method. The TSMI (tetrazolium stained membrane imprint) method of bacterial wound counting has been validated in a tissue model and human surgical wounds in conventionally ventilated theatres. This method remains to be assessed in UCA where wounds may be too clean for bacteria to be detected accurately. We used air counts within 30cm of the wound and tested the TSMI method in wounds. Bacteria were recovered from 62% of the wounds. The mean air count wearing BES was 0. 5 cfu/m3 compared with 1. 0 cfu/m3 with Rotecno. The air counts were significantly higher with Rotecno clothing (p=0. 014, Toeplitz covariance analysis). The mean wound count was 14 bacteria/ wound with BES and 8 bacteria/wound with Rotecno. Although the counts were higher with BES the difference was not significant (p=0. 7, MannWhitney U test). There was no significant correlation between air and wound counts (r = 0. 108, Spearman’s). On first impression Rotecno occlusive clothing would appear to be less effective than BES on account of the higher air counts. However wounds were equally contaminated with both clothing types. As there is no relationship between wound and air counts, this suggests that at very low levels of air contamination the contribution of bacteria to the wound from the air is irrelevant. Even doubling of air counts from 0. 5 to 1. 0 cfu/m3 had no detectable effect on the wound.
Knee arthroscopy is typically approached from the anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral portals. Access to the posterior compartments through these portals can cause iatrogenic cartilage damage and create difficulties in viewing the structures of the posterior compartments. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of needle arthroscopy using direct posterior portals as both working and visualising portals. For workability, the needle scope was inserted advanced from anterior between the cruciate ligament bundle and the lateral wall of the medial femoral condyle until the posterior compartments were visualised. For visualisation, direct postero-lateral and -medial portals were established. The technique was performed in 9 knees by two experienced researchers. Workability and instrumentation of the posteromedial compartment and meniscus was achieved in 56%. The posterior horns could not be visualised in four specimens as the straight lens could not provide a more medial field of view. Visualisation from the direct medial posterior portal allowed a clear view of the medial meniscus, femoral condyle and posterior cruciate ligament in all specimens. Workability and instrumentation of the posterolateral compartment was not possible with the needle scope. Direct posterior approaches for the posteromedial compartment access are challenging with the current needle scope options and could only be achieved in over 50%. The postero-lateral compartment was not accessible. An angled lens or a flexible Needle scope would be better
Surgical education of fracture fixation biomechanics relies mainly on simplified illustrations to distill the essence of the underlying principles. These mostly consist of textbook drawings or hands-on exercises during courses, both with unique advantages such as broad availability and haptics, respectively. Computer simulations are
Introduction. The current treatment for Freiberg's osteochondrosis centres around either: simple debridement or debridement osteotomy. The main principle of the osteotomy is to rotate normal articular cartilage into the affected area. We recommend the use of CT scanning to delineate the amount of available, unaffected cartilage available to rotate into the affected space. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 32 CT scans of new Freiberg's diagnoses in Sheffield over a 10 year period using the PACS system. We identified the sagittal CT slice that displayed the widest portion of proximal articular margin of the proximal phalanx and measured the diseased segment of the corresponding metatarsal head as an arc (in degrees). This arc segment was divided by 360°. This gave a ratio of the affected arc in the sagittal plane. Results. 28 out of 32 cases involved the 2nd metatarsal with the remaining 4 involving the 3rd metatarsal head. Of 32 cases, 18 had fragmentation. Surgically, 20 had debridement only, 5 also had an osteotomy and 1 had a fusion. 6 of the 32 cases were managed non-operatively. 11 cases out of 32 had an arc ratio of < 0.3. Of these, only 3 had an osteotomy, 3 had no procedure and 5 had a simple debridement. Of those that had osteotomies (5/32), 3 of the 5 cases had an arc ratio of < 0.3 with the other 2 being 0.42 and 0.38. Discussion. We hypothesise that those cases with an arc ratio of less 0.3 would be amenable to a dorsal closing wedge osteotomy and those with a ratio of more than 0.4 would be better
The regenerative capacity of hyaline cartilage is greatly limited. To prevent the onset of osteoarthritis, cartilage defects have to be properly treated. Cartilage, tissue engineered by mean of bioactive glass (BG) scaffolds presents a promising approach. Until now, conventional BGs have been used mostly for bone regeneration, as they are able to form a hydroxyapatite (HA) layer and are therefore, less
Introduction. Articular cartilage has a low self-regeneration capacity. Cartilage defects have to be treated to minimize the risk of the onset of osteoarthritis. Bioactive glass (BG) is a promising source for cartilage tissue engineering. Until now, conventional BGs (like BG1393) have been used, mostly for bone regeneration, as they are able to form a hydroxyapatite layer and are therefore, less
Aims. Management of intra-articular calcaneal fractures remains a debated topic in orthopaedics, with operative fixation often held in reserve due to concerns regarding perioperative morbidity and potential complications. The purpose of this study was to identify the characteristics of patients who developed surgical complications to inform the future stratification of patients best
Introduction. Reducing infection in total joint replacement by using ultra clean air and protective enclosed
Abstract. OBJECTIVES. Application of deep learning approaches to marker trajectories and ground reaction forces (mocap data), is often hampered by small datasets. Enlarging dataset size is possible using some simple numerical approaches, although these may not be
Aim. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presents significant challenges to healthcare systems globally. Orthopaedic surgeons are at risk of contracting COVID-19 due to their close contact with patients in both outpatient and theatre environments. The aim of this review was to perform a literature review, including articles of other coronaviruses, to formulate guidelines for orthopaedic healthcare staff. Methods. A search of Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, World Health Organization (WHO), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) databases was performed encompassing a variety of terms including ‘coronavirus’, ‘covid-19’, ‘orthopaedic’, ‘personal protective environment’ and ‘PPE’. Online database searches identified 354 articles. Articles were included if they studied any of the other coronaviruses or if the basic science could potentially applied to COVID-19 (i.e. use of an inactivated virus with a similar diameter to COVID-19). Two reviewers independently identified and screened articles based on the titles and abstracts. 274 were subsequently excluded, with 80 full-text articles retrieved and assessed for eligibility. Of these, 66 were excluded as they compared personal protection equipment to no personal protection equipment or referred to prevention measures in the context of bacterial infections. Results. There is a paucity of high quality evidence surrounding COVID-19. This review collates evidence from previous coronavirus outbreaks to put forward recommendations for orthopaedic surgeons during the COVID-19 pandemic. The key findings have been summarized and interpreted for application to the orthopaedic operative setting. Conclusion. For COVID-19 positive patients, minimum suggested PPE includes N95 respirator, goggles, face shield, gown, double gloves, and surgical balaclava. Space
Introduction. The aim of this study was to assess patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) opinions on the validity of using a biopsychosocial model rather than a biomedical model in alleviating patient symptoms/pain. Method. We constructed a questionnaire to assess beliefs on the effectiveness of using a biopsychosocial or biomedical model to develop a treatment plan to optimise patient symptoms/pain. We distributed the questionnaire to new and follow-up patients and healthcare professional in the orthopaedic department. Results. 246 questionnaires were completed - 183 patients and 63 HCPs. The patient group consisted of 77 males and 106 females, the HCP group of 27 males and 36 females. 77(42%) of patients and 9(14%) of HCPs agree the biomedical model is best
Abstract. Focal articular cartilage defects do not heal and, left untreated, progress to more widespread degenerative changes. A promising new approach for the repair of articular cartilage defects is the application of cell-based regenerative therapies using mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). MSCs are however present in a number of tissues and studies suggest that they vary in their proliferation, cell surface characterisation and differentiation. As the phenotypic properties of MSCs vary depending on tissue source, a systematic comparison of the transcriptomic signature would allow a better understanding of these differences between tissues, and allow the identification of markers specific to a MSC source that is best
Using an institutional database we have identified over 1000 femoral revisions using extensively porous-coated stems. Using femoral re-revision for any reason as an endpoint, the survivorship is 99 ± 0.8% (95% confidence interval) at 2 years, 97 ± 1.3% at 5 years, 95.6 ± 1.8% at 10 years, and 94.5 ± 2.2% at 15 years. Similar to Moreland and Paprosky, we have identified pre-revision bone stock as a factor affecting femoral fixation. When the cortical damage involved bone more than 10cm below the lesser trochanter, the survivorship, using femoral re-revision for any reason or definite radiographic loosening as an endpoint, was reduced significantly, as compared with femoral revisions with less cortical damage. In addition to patients with Paprosky Type 3B and 4 femoral defects, there are rare patients with femoral canals smaller than 13.5mm or larger than 26mm that are not well