Post-discharge surveillance of surgical site infection is necessary if accurate rates of infection following surgery are to be available. We undertook a prospective study of 376 knee and hip replacements in 366 patients in order to estimate the rate of orthopaedic surgical site infection in the community. The inpatient infection was 3.1% and the post-discharge infection rate was 2.1%. We concluded that the use of telephone interviews of patients to identify the group at highest risk of having a surgical site infection (those who think they have an infection) with rapid follow-up by a professional trained to diagnose infection according to agreed criteria is an effective method of identifying infection after discharge from hospital.

The rate of arterial injury in trauma patients with pelvic ring fractures has been cited as high as 15%. Addressing this source of hemorrhage is essential in the management of these patients as mortality rates are reported as 50%. Percutaneous techniques to control arterial bleeding, such as embolization and REBOA, are being employed with increasing frequency due to their assumed lower morbidity and invasiveness than open exploration or cross clamping of the aorta. There are promising results with regards to the mortality benefits of angioembolization. However, there are concerns with regards to morbidity associated with embolization of the internal iliac vessels and its branches including surgical wound infection, gluteal muscle necrosis, nerve injury, bowel infarction, and thigh / buttock claudication. The primary aim of this study is to determine whether pelvic arterial embolization is associated with surgical site infection (SSI) in trauma patients undergoing pelvic ring fixation. This observational cohort study was conducted using US trauma registry data from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Trauma Database for the year of 2018. Patients over the age of 18 who were transported through emergency health services to an ACS Level 1 or 2 trauma hospital and sustained a pelvic ring fracture treated with surgical fixation were included. Patients who were transferred between facilities, presented to the emergency department with no signs of life, presented with isolated penetrating trauma, and pregnant patients were excluded from the study. The primary study outcome was surgical site infection. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate treatment effects of angioembolization of pelvic vessels on surgical site infection, adjusting for known risk factors for infection. Study analysis included 6562 trauma patients, of which 508 (7.7%) of patients underwent pelvic angioembolization. Overall, 148 (2.2%) of patients had a surgical site infection, with a higher risk (7.1%) in patients undergoing angioembolization (unadjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.0; 95% CI 2.7, 6.0; p < 0 .0001). Controlling for potential confounding, including patient demographics, vitals on hospital arrival, open fracture, ISS, and select patient comorbidities, pelvic angioembolization was still significantly associated with increased odds for surgical site infection (adjusted OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.3, 3.2; p=0.003). This study demonstrates that trauma patients who undergo pelvic angioembolization and operative fixation of pelvic ring injuries have a higher surgical site infection risk. As the use of percutaneous hemorrhage control techniques increase, it is important to remain judicious in patient selection

The incidence of MRSA infection is increasing worldwide. Costs incurred in treating MRSA infection are over twice that of normal patients, and the duration of hospital stay is up to 10 times longer. Risk factors are age, previous MRSA infection, prolonged hospitalization, patients from convalescent homes, immunocompromised states, vascular and pulmonary disease. Methods. A retrospective chart review was conducted on 14 patients who developed MRSA infection in our unit, over a period of six years. Data included: age, gender, neurological status, length of hospital and ICU admission, type of procedure performed, HIV status, co-morbidities, nutritional status, haemoglobin, sensitivities and treatment. Results. Age ranged from 2 to 52 (mean 15.75 years) and included four males, six females, and four children. Of the thirteen patients who developed Surgical Site Infection (SSI), nine were posterior surgical wounds. Two patients were HIV positive. Mean albumin and lymphocyte count was 34.88 and 2.37 respectively. The average wait to surgery was 23.8 hospital days, average length of ICU admission was 5.01 days. Signs of SSI developed at 11.75 days on average. Four cases showed sensitivity to Vancomycin, while ten were sensitive to Clindamycin. Patients were treated for a total of six weeks with antimicrobial therapy. Five patients required debridement, two required implant removal for chronic infection. Infection subsequently resolved in all patients. Conclusion. The risk factors were prolonged hospitalization, and posterior surgical wounds. Infection by community acquired MRSA was twice as common as nosocomial MRSA. Current recommendations are to treat superficial sepsis with topical Mupirocin, while systemic antibiotics are reserved for patients at risk for MRSA bacteraemia and who have prosthetic implants. Screening for patient colonization is recommended when risk factors are present, while staff screening is recommended following outbreaks. The cornerstone in preventing MRSA infection is strict hand hygiene

Revision TKR is a challenging surgical procedure that requires considerable pre-operative evaluation and planning. The diagnostic evaluation for the presence of periprosthetic sepsis has been well described and is of paramount importance. Optimal results of revision TKR mandate that the etiology of failure, and reason for revision, be clearly understood, since the outcome of revision TKR for unexplained pain has been disappointing. Physical examination should include a careful assessment of range of motion, ligament stability, quality of the soft tissues around the knee and the location of any prior incisions around the knee. The above information provides valuable information about any potential difficulties with surgical exposure, selection of the safest surgical incision, potential problems with soft tissue coverage and selection of an implant with the proper degree of constraint. Plain radiographs should be carefully evaluated for fixation, alignment, osteolysis and extent of bone deficiency around each component. This information is essential in order to develop a strategy for removal of existing implants and cement, obtaining satisfactory fixation of a new implant and managing bone deficiencies encountered at the time of surgery using a variety of stems, augments and bone grafts. The goals of revision TKR are simple to state but difficult to obtain: stable implant fixation, a healed surgical wound without infection, restoration of alignment, stability and a functional range of motion. Despite the most conscientious pre-operative planning, one must be prepared for the unexpected and any surgical plan requires a sound “back-up” plan

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the severity of anaemia on postoperative complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

The Department of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service established the Nosocomial Infection National Surveillance Scheme in order to standardise the collection of information about infections acquired in hospital in the United Kingdom and provide national data with which hospitals could measure their own performance. The definition of superficial incisional infection (skin and subcutaneous tissue), set by the Center for Disease Control (CDC), should meet at least one of the defined criteria which would confirm the diagnosis and determine the need for specific treatment.

We have assessed the interobserver reliability of the criteria for superficial incisional infection set by the CDC in our current practice. The incisional site of 50 patients who had an elective primary arthroplasty of the hip or knee was evaluated independently by two orthopaedic clinical research fellows and two orthopaedic ward sisters for the presence or absence of surgical-site infection. Interobserver reliability was assessed by comparison of the criteria for wound infection used by the four observers using kappa reliability coefficients. Our study demonstrated that some of the components of the current CDC criteria were unreliable and we recommend their revision.

National guidelines state that in patients undergoing operations the site of the procedure should be marked. In clinical practice the same marker is used repeatedly. We are not aware of any investigation regarding the theoretical risk of transferring organisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphyloccocus aureus (MRSA) between patients by a skin marker.

In an experimental setting, Penflex and Viomedex skin markers were tested 30 times each after contaminating them with a standard inoculum of MRSA. The survival of the organism on the tip of the markers was assessed by culture on MRSA-indicator nutrient agar plates at 0, 5, 15 and 60 minutes, 24 and 48 hours and at 1, 2, and 3 weeks after contamination.

There was a significant difference between the markers, with the Penflex showing no survival of MRSA after 15 minutes whereas the Viomedex product continued to produce MRSA cultures for up to three weeks.