Open debridement and Outerbridge and Kashiwagi debridement arthroplasty (OK procedure) are common surgical treatments for elbow arthritis. However, the literature contains little information on the long-term survivorship of these procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the survivorship after elbow debridement techniques until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and revision surgery. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent open elbow surgical debridement (open debridement, OK procedure) between 2000 and 2015. Patients were diagnosed with primary elbow osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, or inflammatory arthritis. A total of 320 patients had primary surgery including open debridement (n=142) and OK procedure (n=178), and of these 33 patients required a secondary revision surgery (open debridement, n=14 and OK procedure, n=19). The average follow-up time was 11.5 years (5.5 - 21.5 years). Survivorship was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Log Rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used assess the likelihood of conversion to total elbow arthroplasty or revision surgery while adjusting for covariates (age, gender, diagnosis). Significance was set p<0.05. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed open debridement was 100.00% at 1 year, 99.25% at 5 years, and 98.49% at 10 years and for OK procedure 100.00% at 1 year, 98.80% at 5 years, 97.97% at 10 years (p=0.87) for conversion to total elbow arthroplasty. There was no difference in survivorship between procedures after adjusting for significant covariates with the cox proportional hazard model. The rate of revision for open debridement and OK procedure was similar at 11.31% rand 11.48% after 10 years respectively. There were higher rates of revision surgery in patients with open debridement (hazard ratio, 4.84 CI 1.29 – 18.17, p = 0.019) compared to OK procedure after adjusting for covariates. We also performed a stratified analysis with radiographic severity as an effect modifier and showed grade 3 arthritis did better with the OK procedure compared to open debridement for survivorship until revision surgery (p=0.05). However, this difference was not found for grade 1 or grade 2 arthritis. This may suggest that performing the OK procedure for more severe grade 3 arthritis could decrease reoperation rates. Further investigations are needed to better understand the indications for each surgical technique. This study is the largest cohort of open debridement and OK procedure with long term follow-up. We showed that open elbow debridement and the OK procedure have excellent survivorship until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and are viable options in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis and post traumatic cases. The OK procedure also has lower rates of revision surgery than open debridement, especially with more severe radiographic arthritis

Open debridement and Outerbridge and Kashiwagi debridement arthroplasty (OK procedure) are common surgical treatments for elbow arthritis. However, the literature contains little information on the long-term survivorship of these procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the survivorship after elbow debridement techniques until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and revision surgery. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent open elbow surgical debridement (open debridement, OK procedure) between 2000 and 2015. Patients were diagnosed with primary elbow osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, or inflammatory arthritis. A total of 320 patients had primary surgery including open debridement (n=142) and OK procedure (n=178), and of these 33 patients required a secondary revision surgery (open debridement, n=14 and OK procedure, n=19). The average follow-up time was 11.5 years (5.5 - 21.5 years). Survivorship was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Log Rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used assess the likelihood of conversion to total elbow arthroplasty or revision surgery while adjusting for covariates (age, gender, diagnosis). Significance was set p<0.05. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed open debridement was 100.00% at 1 year, 99.25% at 5 years, and 98.49% at 10 years and for OK procedure 100.00% at 1 year, 98.80% at 5 years, 97.97% at 10 years (p=0.87) for conversion to total elbow arthroplasty. There was no difference in survivorship between procedures after adjusting for significant covariates with the cox proportional hazard model. The rate of revision for open debridement and OK procedure was similar at 11.31% rand 11.48% after 10 years respectively. There were higher rates of revision surgery in patients with open debridement (hazard ratio, 4.84 CI 1.29 - 18.17, p = 0.019) compared to OK procedure after adjusting for covariates. We also performed a stratified analysis with radiographic severity as an effect modifier and showed grade 3 arthritis did better with the OK procedure compared to open debridement for survivorship until revision surgery (p=0.05). However, this difference was not found for grade 1 or grade 2 arthritis. This may suggest that performing the OK procedure for more severe grade 3 arthritis could decrease reoperation rates. Further investigations are needed to better understand the indications for each surgical technique. This study is the largest cohort of open debridement and OK procedure with long term follow-up. We showed that open elbow debridement and the OK procedure have excellent survivorship until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and are viable options in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis and post traumatic cases. The OK procedure also has lower rates of revision surgery than open debridement, especially with more severe radiographic arthritis

Source of the study: University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is effective for patients with isolated compartment osteoarthritis, however the procedure has higher revision rates. Long-term survivorship and accurate characterisation of revision reasons are limited by a lack of long-term data and standardised revision definitions. We aimed to identify survivorship, risk factors and revision reasons in a large UKA cohort with up to 20 years follow-up. Patient, implant and revision details were recorded through clinical and radiological review for 2,137 consecutive patients undergoing primary medial UKA across Auckland, Canterbury, Counties Manukau and Waitematā DHB between 2000 and 2017. Revision reasons were determined from review of clinical, laboratory, and radiological records for each patient using a standardised protocol. To ensure complete follow-up data was cross-referenced with the New Zealand Joint Registry to identify patients undergoing subsequent revision outside the hospitals. Implant survival, revision risk and revision reasons were analysed using Cox proportional-hazards and competing risk analyses. Implant survivorship at 15 years was comparable for cemented fixed-bearing (cemFB; 91%) and uncemented mobile-bearing (uncemMB; 91%), but lower for cemented mobile-bearing (cemMB; 80%) implants. There was higher incidence of aseptic loosening with cemented implants (3–4% vs. 0.4% uncemented, p<0.01), osteoarthritis (OA) progression with cemMB implants (9% vs. 3% cemFB/uncemMB; p<0.05) and bearing dislocations with uncemMB implants (3% vs. 2% cemMB, p=0.02). Compared with the oldest patients (≥75 years), there was a nearly two-fold increase in risk for those aged 55–64 (hazard ratio 1.9; confidence interval 1.1-3.3, p=0.03). No association was found with gender, BMI or ASA. Cemented mobile-bearing implants and younger age were linked to lower implant survivorship. These were associated with disease progression and bearing dislocations. The use of cemented fixed-bearing and uncemented mobile-bearing designs have superior comparable long-term survivorship

Abstract. Background. The primary objective of the study is to determine the function outcome and survivorship of patellofemoral replacement. The secondary aim is to find the determinants of successful/poor outcome. Methods. This retrospective study involved 45 patients who underwent AVON patellofemoral replacement between January 2015 to December 2020 with the minimal follow-up off for 12 months. The functional outcome was measured using Oxford Knee score (OKS), EuroQol five dimension (EQ-5D). IWANO and Kellgren-Lawrence classification was used to analyse radiographs. To identify determinants of outcome, the following subgroups the presence or absence of normal alignment, tibiofemoral arthritis, trochlear dysplasia and previous surgery. Complications and revision rates were also recorded. Results. The mean follow-up period was 41.7 +/− 8.3 months with no patients lost in follow-up. Patellofemoral replacement significantly improved the Oxford Knee score (OKS), EuroQol five dimension (EQ-5D) (p<0.001). Four out of 45(8.9%) patients underwent revision surgery. Patients with normal alignment preoperatively did worse than those with abnormal alignment with patellar instability. Patients with grade two tibiofemoral arthritis, history of previous surgery did significantly worse with poorer functional outcome. Conclusion. Patellofemoral arthroplasty is reliable treatment option which improves patient function and quality of life with good survivorship in isolated patellofemoral arthritis in mid-term follow-up

Abstract. Background and study aim. The UK National Joint Registry(NJR) has not reported total knee replacement (TKR)survivorship based on design philosophy alone, unlike its international counterparts. We report outcomes of implant survivorship based on design philosophy using data from NJR's 2020 annual report. Materials and methods. All TKR implants with an identifiable design philosophy from NJR data were included. Cumulative revision data for cruciate-retaining(CR), posterior stabilised(PS), mobile-bearing(MB) design philosophies was derived from merged NJR data. Cumulative revision data for individual brands of implants with the medial pivot(MP) philosophy were used to calculate overall survivorship for this design philosophy. The all-cause revision was used as the endpoint and calculated to 15 years follow-up with Kaplan-Meier curves. Results. 1,144,384 TKRs were included. CR is the most popular design philosophy (67.4%), followed by PS (23.1%), MB (6.9%) and least commonly MP (2.6%). MP and CR implants showed the best survivorship (95.7% and 95.6% respectively) at 15 years which is statistically significant at, and beyond, 10 years. Observed survivorship was lower at all time points with the PS and MB implants (94.5% for both designs at 15 years). Conclusions. While all design philosophies considered in this study survive well, CR and MP designs offer statistically superior survivorship at and beyond 10 years. MP design performs better than CR beyond 13 years yet, remain the least popular design philosophy used. Publishing data based on knee arthroplasty design philosophy would help surgeons when making decisions on implant choice

The Oxford mobile bearing knee prosthesis (Zimmer Biomet Inc, Warsaw, Ind) is considered a good treatment option for isolated medial compartment knee arthrosis. From February 2001 until August 2016, 1719 primary Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement procedures were completed at our center by a group of seven surgeons. We undertook this study to examine the long-term survivorship of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement looking at survivorship and reasons for failure. A retrospective consecutive case series review was completed, and all revisions and re-operations were identified. Conversion to total knee replacement (TKA) was considered a failure. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate the 15-year survivorship of the group overall. We specifically looked at age, gender, BMI and surgeon caseload in addition to the reasons for failure. A statistical analysis was performed and differences in survivorship were compared for the variables listed. A logistic cox regression was performed to explore predictors of revision. Overall 15-year survivorship was 89.9%. Female survivorship of 88.1% was statistically worse than the male group at 91.8% (p=0.018). Younger patients (75yrs of age (p= 0.036). There was a large range in surgical case load by individual surgeons (range 17–570 knees). There were no statistically significant differences in age, BMI, or gender when comparing the individual surgeon groups. There was a large range in 15-year survivorship between individual surgeons (range 78.3% – 95%). Overall the most common reason for revision was due to wear of the unreplaced portion of the knee (lateral and/or patella-femoral joint) followed by aseptic loosening, polyethylene dislocation, infection or persistent pain. The 15-year survivorship results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement at our center compares favourably to other published series and large registry data series. We found a reduction in survivorship in female patients and younger patients (< 5 5yrs). There were also significant differences in survivorship based on the individual surgeon. A more selective patient approach yielded the best long-term survivorship and equivalent to that of total knee replacement. We therefore suggest using a more selective approach when choosing patients for a medial unicompartmental knee replacement with the Oxford mobile bearing prosthesis in order to enhance long-term survivorship

INTRODUCTION. There is ongoing debate about the possible advantages of unicompartmental (UNI) knee replacement versus total knee replacement (TKR), such as for young, active patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate functional, radiographic, and device survivorship outcomes of UNI knee replacement with a newer generation UNI through 2-years post-op. METHODS. A retrospective review of 188 cemented, fixed bearing unicompartmental (UNI) knee replacements implanted between January 2009 and June 2012 at 3 centers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survivorship, reasons for revision, radiographic and clinical results. A chart review was performed to collect demographics, operative details, American Knee Society (AKS) scores and adverse events (AE) through 2-years post-op. Kaplan-Meier (KM) device survivorship rates for the partial knee construct were estimated for post-op years in which at least 40 subjects had later follow-up. The definition of revision was the removal of any component for any reason, and device survivorship was the lack of revision. The time variable was the time to revision if the knee had been revised, or the time to last clinical follow-up or death if the knee had not been revised. The average follow-up was 2.03 years (SD=0.4). The mean age was 64 years (SD=10.5), 56% of the patients were 65 years or younger, mean BMI was 27.5 kg/m2 (SD=4.9), 60% of patients were women, and 89% had a diagnosis of OA (9.6% had AVN). Data were collected through April 2015. RESULTS. The KM device survivorship was 98.7% at 2 years (95% CI: 94.8–99.7%) (Figure 1). There were 3 revisions, 2 of which were prior to 2 years post-op (Figure 2) Overall, there were 23 operative site adverse events, including the 3 revisions. The most common AE was arthralgia (4.3%). There were no observations of lucencies, osteolysis, stress shielding, or femoral notching. At 2-years post-op the average AKS score was 89.9 points (N= 138, SD=11); 84% were in the good to excellent range. The average improvement from pre-op baseline at 2-years was 37.4 (N=117, SD=18). The average improvement in pain was 30 points (N=124, SD=15) on a 0–50 point scale, with 70% having no pain and 20% having mild pain at 2-years. Preoperatively, the average flexion was 118 degrees (N=152, SD=12.7o), which improved to 126 degrees (N=148, SD=9.4 o) at 2-years; average change from pre-op was 7.1 degrees (N=136, SD=12.2 o). Preoperatively, the average extension was 1.9 degrees (N=152, SD=3.6 o) which improved to 0.5 degrees (N=148, SD=1.6 o) at 2-years; average change from pre-op was a 1.4 degree improvement (N=136, SD=3.6 o). DISCUSSION. Overall results demonstrated excellent 2 year survivorship for this newer generation UNI, consistent with published national registry results for the class of UNIs. The clinical results demonstrated excellent pain relief and improvements in motion compared to preoperative. It will be of interest to investigate longer term outcomes of UNI knee replacement in a larger patient population, with a focus on younger, more active patients (younger than 60), perhaps with an emphasis on the quality of life

Background. In this study, we assessed implant survivorship, patient satisfaction, and patient-reported functional outcomes at two years for patients implanted with a customized, posterior stabilized knee replacement system. Methods. Ninety-three patients (100 knees) with the customized PS TKR were enrolled at two centers. Patients’ length of hospitalization and preoperative pain intensity were assessed. At a single time point follow-up, we assessed patient reported outcomes utilizing the KOOS Jr., satisfaction rates, implant survivorship, patients’ perception of their knee and their overall preference between the two knees, if they had their contralateral knee replaced with an off-the-shelf (OTS) implant. Results. At an average of 1.9-years implant survivorship was found to be 100%. From pre-op until time of follow-up, we observed an average decrease of 5.4 on the numeric pain rating scale. Satisfaction rate was found to be high with 90% of patients being satisfied or very satisfied and 88% of patients reporting a “natural” perception of their knee some or all the time. Patients with bilateral implants mostly (12/15) stated that they preferred their customized implant over the standard TKR. The evaluation of KOOS Jr. showed an average score of 90 at the time of the follow up. Conclusion. Based on our results, we believe that the customized PS implant provides patients with excellent outcomes post-surgery. Moreover, a subset of patients with an OTS implant in one knee and a customized PS implant in the other, we observed a trend in patients preferring the customized PS device over their OTS counterparts

INTRODUCTION. Successful clinical outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) depend on component positioning, soft tissue balance and lower limb alignment, all of which can be difficult to achieve using manual instrumentation. A new robotic-guided technology has been shown to improve postoperative implant positioning and lower limb alignment in UKA but so far no studies have reported clinical results of robotic-assisted medial UKA. Goal of this study therefore was to assess outcomes of robotic-assisted medial UKA in a large cohort of patients at short-term follow-up. METHODS. This multicenter study with IRB approval examines the survivorship and satisfaction of this robotic-assisted procedure coupled with an anatomically designed UKA implant at a minimum of two-year follow-up. A total of 1007 patients (1135 knees) underwent robotic-assisted surgery for a medial UKA from six surgeons at separate institutions in the United States. All patients received a fixed-bearing metal backed onlay implant as the tibial component between March 2009 and December 2011 (Figure 1). Each patient was contacted at minimum two-year follow-up and asked a series of five questions to determine implant survivorship and patient satisfaction. Survivorship analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method and worst-case scenario analysis was performed whereby all patients were considered as revision when they declined study participation. Revision rates were compared in younger and older patients (age cut-off 60 years) and in patients with different body mass index (body mass index cut-off 35 kg/m. 2. ). Two-sided chi-square tests were used to compare these groups. RESULTS. Data was collected for 797 patients (909 knees) with an average follow-up of 29.6 months (range: 22 – 52 months). At 2.5-years follow-up, eleven knees were reported as revised, which resulted in a survivorship of 98.8% (Figure 2). Thirty-five patients declined to participate in the study yielding a worst-case survivorship of 96.0%. Higher revision rates were seen in younger patients (2.60% versus 0.93%, p = 0.09) and in morbidly obese patients (3.36% versus 0.91%, p = 0.03). Of all patients without revision, 92% was either very satisfied or satisfied with their knee function (Figure 3). CONCLUSION. In this multicenter study, robotic-assisted UKA was found to have high survivorship and satisfaction rate at short-term follow-up. Prospective comparison studies with longer follow-up are necessary in order to compare survivorship and satisfaction rates of robotic-assisted UKA to conventional UKA and robotic-assisted UKA to total knee arthroplasty. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Introduction. We sought to determine the 10-year survivorship of single-radius, posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in Asian patients. We also aimed to determine whether the long-term clinical and radiographic results differed between patients with and without patellar resurfacing. Materials and Methods. This retrospective study included 148 (115 patients) consecutive single-radius, posterior-stabilized TKAs. Ten-year survivorship analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with additional surgery for any reason as the end-point. Furthermore, long-term clinical and radiographic results of 109 knees (74%; 84 patients) with more than a 10-year follow-up were analyzed. Ten-year survivorship and long-term outcomes after surgery were determined, and outcomes were compared between patients with and without patellar resurfacing. Results. Cumulative survival rate of the single-radius posterior-stabilized TKA of 148 knees was 97.7% (95% confidence interval, 93.1%–99.3%) at 10 years after surgery. Three knees had additional surgery during the 10-year follow-up because of one case of instability and two periprosthetic infections. Mean postoperative Knee Society knee score and function score were 97 and 75, respectively. There was no aseptic loosening of the prosthesis, even though a non-progressive radiolucent line was found in 10 (9%) knees. There were no differences in postoperative scores and degree of patellar tilt and displacement between patients with and without patellar resurfacing. Conclusions. Single-radius, posterior-stabilized TKA showed satisfactory long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes in Asian patients regardless of patellar resurfacing, with comparable survivorship to that reported in westerners

Background. Unicompartmental knee replacements (UKR) converted to total knee replacements (TKR) have often been viewed with scepticism because of the perceived difficulty of the revision and because revision procedures generally do less well than primaries. Methods. This is a prospective review of TKRs converted from a UKR between 1982 and 2000. We present the survivorship of a 77 patient cohort and the clinical results of 35 patients. All information was recorded at the time of surgery onto a database and patients have been regularly reviewed since. Results. The 77 patients in the survivorship study had an average follow-up of 6.9 years and an average Bristol Knee Score of 78.5. Using Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis a 91% survivorship at 10 years was demonstrated. Only 35 patients are currently alive and available for examination. The average age at which the UKR was performed was 59.8 yrs, with a time to failure averaging 8.2 yrs. The average age at revision to TKR was 66.1 yrs. There was an average follow-up period of 10.5 yrs and an average Bristol Knee Score of 78.2 with 16 excellent, 11 good, 5 fair and 3 failed results. Conclusion. Previous studies have shown that revision of UKR to TKR is not technically difficult. This study shows that the survivorship following revision of a UKR is comparable to that of a primary TKR but the clinical results are less good

Aim. To assess the survivorship of unicompartmental replacements (UKR) revised to UKR. Background: Partial revision of UKR, or revision to a further UKR is a rarely performed procedure with some data from the Australian registry suggesting that results are not good, with early revision being required. Method. All revision procedures from initial UKR are prospectively followed and scored as part of our department's knee database. We analysed the 37 cases in our database that showed revision of UKR to UKR. These included cases in the following categories: a) Mobile bearing revised to mobile bearing (n=8) b) Mobile bearing revised to fixed bearing (n=20) c) Fixed bearing revised to fixed bearing (n=9). Results. The survivorship of revisions of mobile UKR to mobile UKR was 87.5% at a mean of 5 yrs. The survivorship of revisions from mobile UKR to fixed bearing UKR was 95% at a mean of 8 yrs. The survivorship of revisions from fixed bearing UKR to fixed bearing UKR was 78% at 15 yr (1 revised at 9yrs, 1 at 12 yrs). Conclusion. Despite the perception that revision of a UKR to another UKR is likely to fail and require early revision, our results suggest that in specific circumstances acceptable survivorship and outcome are possible. MULTIPLE DISCLOSURES

INTRODUCTION. Successful clinical outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) depend on component positioning, soft tissue balance and overall limb alignment which can be difficult to achieve using manual instrumentation. Recently, robotically guided technology has been used to improve post-operative implant positioning, and limb alignment in UKA with the expectation that this will result in greater implant longevity. This multi-center study examines the survivorship of this robotically guided procedure coupled with a novel, anatomically designed UKA implant at two years follow up. OBJECTIVES. This study examines the two year survivorship and patient satisfaction of an anatomically designed UKA implant using a new robotically guided technology that has been shown to improve implant positioning and alignment. METHODS. 788 patients (890 knees) from 6 surgeons underwent robotically guided unicompartmental arthroplasty surgery and reached a minimum two year follow-up. The tibial component was a fixed bearing, metal backed onlay design. Patients were consecutive for each respective surgeon and were also each surgeon's first series of patients for that implant system. As part of an IRB approved study, every patient was contacted and asked a series of five questions to determine implant survivorship and patient satisfaction at a two year follow up. 620 patients (701 knees) enrolled in the study; the overall enrollment rate was 79%. There were 352 males and 266 females; the average age was 70 ± 9.23 years (range: 39–93) and the average BMI was 29.35 ± 4.59 (range: 18.97–47.77). The average follow up at the time the patients were contacted was 30 ± 5.53 months (range: 22–42). RESULTS. Eight knees were reported as revised within 24 months after the index procedure, yielding a two year revision rate of 1.1%. The average time to revision was 11 months. Five patients returned to their same surgeon for the revision procedure. Seven knees were revised to a total knee arthroplasty; one knee was revised to another unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. 71% of patients reported feeling “Very Satisfied” with their overall knee function. 22% of patients reported feeling “Satisfied,” 3% of patients reported feeling “Neutral,” 3% of patients reported feeling “Dissatisfied,” and 1% of patients reported feeling “Very Dissatisfied”. CONCLUSIONS. Excellent survival and satisfaction outcomes were noted in this subset of patients at two years post-operative. This robotically guided procedure shows promise of improved survivorship rates for UKA compared to what is currently reported in implant registries and comparative studies. These promising results indicate that improved implant placement accuracy achieved with robotic assistance leads to improved implant survivorship and patient outcomes

INTRODUCTION. Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) is an alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for degenerative joint disease when present in only two compartments. BKA spares the cruciate ligaments and preserves bone in the healthy compartment, possibly leading to better knee kinematics and clinical outcomes when compared to TKA. While BKA is a technically demanding procedure when performed with manual instrumentation, robotic assistance allows for accurate implant placement and soft tissue balancing of the joint. Robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has shown favorable clinical outcomes and survivorship at short term (2 year) follow up compared to manual UKA. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the short term functional outcomes and survivorship of patients undergoing robotically assisted BKA. METHODS. 45 patients (48 knees) were identified in an initial and consecutive single surgeon series receiving robotically assisted BKA to correct disease in the medial and patellofemoral compartments. As part of an IRB approved study, every patient in the series was contacted at a minimum two year (±2 months) follow up and asked a series of questions to determine implant survivorship and functional outcomes (using the patient portion of the Knee Society Score). 9 patients were lost to follow up and 1 patient was deceased. 35 patients (38 knees) at a minimum two year follow up enrolled in the study for an enrollment rate of 79%. There are 22 male patients and 13 female patients; the average age at time of surgery is 67.0 ± 6.8 and the average BMI is 29.5 ± 4.6. Five patients in this series also qualified for a 5 year follow up assessment. RESULTS. Only 1 BKA was reported as revised to a TKA at two year follow up. The revision was reported by the patient due to severe pain and occurred 25 months after the index BKA procedure. The patient did not return to the same surgeon for the revision procedure. The average pre-operative Knee Society Function Score was 58.1 ± 9.9 (n=18) and improved at 2 years post-operatively to 81.5 ± 15.9 (n = 36) (p<0.001). Of the 5 patients contacted at a minimum 5 year follow up, there were no reported revisions. CONCLUSIONS. Robotically assisted BKA shows good survivorship and functional outcomes at a short term 2 year follow up. This procedure may be a viable option to patients with only two diseased compartments, as sparing of healthy bone and cruciates may improve overall kinematics and outcomes of the joint. This study remains ongoing to include a larger cohort and longer follow up

Introduction. Bi-compartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) is an alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for degenerative joint disease when present in only two compartments. BKA spares the cruciate ligaments and preserves bone in the healthy compartment, possibly leading to better knee kinematics and clinical outcomes when compared to TKA. While BKA is a technically demanding procedure when performed with manual instrumentation, robotic assistance allows for accurate implant placement and soft tissue balancing of the joint. Robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has shown favourable clinical outcomes and survivorship at short term (2 year) follow up compared to manual UKA. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the short term functional outcomes and survivorship of patients undergoing robotically assisted BKA. Methods. 45 patients (48 knees) were identified in an initial and consecutive single surgeon series receiving robotically assisted BKA to correct disease in the medial and patellofemoral compartments. As part of an IRB approved study, every patient in the series was contacted at a minimum two year (±2 months) follow up and asked a series of questions to determine implant survivorship and functional outcomes (using the patient portion of the Knee Society Score). 9 patients were lost to follow up and 1 patient was deceased. 35 patients (38 knees) at a minimum two year follow up enrolled in the study for an enrolment rate of 79%. There are 22 male patients and 13 female patients; the average age at time of surgery is 67.0 ± 6.8 and the average BMI is 29.5 ± 4.6. Five patients in this series also qualified for a 5 year follow up assessment. Results. Only 1 BKA was reported as revised to a TKA at two year follow up. The revision was reported by the patient due to severe pain and occurred 25 months after the index BKA procedure. The patient did not return to the same surgeon for the revision procedure. The average pre-operative Knee Society Function Score was 58.1 ± 9.9 (n=18) and improved at 2 years post-operatively to 81.5 ± 15.9 (n = 36) (p<0.001). Of the 5 patients contacted at a minimum 5 year follow up, there were no reported revisions. Conclusions. Robotically assisted BKA shows good survivorship and functional outcomes at a short term 2 year follow up. This procedure may be a viable option to patients with only two diseased compartments, as sparing of healthy bone and cruciates may improve overall kinematics and outcomes of the joint. This study remains ongoing to include a larger cohort and longer follow up

INTRODUCTION. Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA) is an alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for degenerative joint disease when present in only two compartments. BKA spares the cruciate ligaments and preserves bone in the healthy compartment, possibly leading to better knee kinematics and clinical outcomes when compared to TKA. While BKA is a technically demanding procedure when performed with manual instrumentation, robotic assistance allows for accurate implant placement and soft tissue balancing of the joint. Robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has shown favorable clinical outcomes and survivorship at short term (2 year) follow up compared to manual UKA. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the short term functional outcomes and survivorship of patients undergoing robotically assisted BKA. METHODS. 45 patients (48 knees) were identified in an initial and consecutive single surgeon series receiving robotically assisted BKA to correct disease in the medial and patellofemoral compartments. As part of an IRB approved study, every patient in the series was contacted at a minimum two year (±2 months) follow up and asked a series of questions to determine implant survivorship and functional outcomes (using the patient portion of the Knee Society Score). 9 patients were lost to follow up and 1 patient was deceased. 35 patients (38 knees) at a minimum two year follow up enrolled in the study for an enrollment rate of 79%. There are 22 male patients and 13 female patients; the average age at time of surgery is 67.0 ± 6.8 and the average BMI is 29.5 ± 4.6. Five patients in this series also qualified for a 5 year follow up assessment. RESULTS. Only 1 BKA was reported as revised to a TKA at two year follow up. The revision was reported by the patient due to severe pain and occurred 25 months after the index BKA procedure. The patient did not return to the same surgeon for the revision procedure. The average pre-operative Knee Society Function Score was 58.1 ± 9.9 (n=18) and improved at 2 years post-operatively to 81.5 ± 15.9 (n = 36) (p<0.001). Of the 5 patients contacted at a minimum 5 year follow up, there were no reported revisions. CONCLUSIONS. Robotically assisted BKA shows good survivorship and functional outcomes at a short term 2 year follow up. This procedure may be a viable option to patients with only two diseased compartments, as sparing of healthy bone and cruciates may improve overall kinematics and outcomes of the joint. This study remains ongoing to include a larger cohort and longer follow up

Introduction. The National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man (NJR) monitors the performance of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) implants and summarizes usage and outcomes for specific hip systems. The objectives of this study were to 1) determine if survivorship for the PROCOTYL® L acetabular cup, a hemispherical press-fit cup coated with hydroxyapatite and a metal on XLPE articulation, is significantly different from all other cementless cups in the NJR and 2) to analyze patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) at a minimum five year follow-up for the subject cup. Methods. The database of the NJR was searched for demographic information and survivorship data for all THAs performed with the PROCOTYL® L cup (metal on XLPE) and all other cementless cups. Survivorship data for both groups was adjusted to exclude metal on metal bearings and compared for all revisions and acetabular revisions only. The Cox Proportional Hazards model for the revision risk ratio of the subject cup to all cementless cups was also calculated. Patients with the subject cup implanted for at least five years were mailed a PROMs program questionnaire consisting of the Oxford Hip, EQ-5D, and EQ VAS scores. No pre-operative PROMs scores were collected. Results. Patient demographic information for the subject system and all cementless cups is provided in Figure 1. As seen in Figure 2, the six-year survivorship for the 1,172 THAs using the subject system (97.8%) was slightly higher than the survivorship for all cementless cups (97.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant (Figure 3). The 1, 2, and 5 year survivorship for the subject cup also exceeded the survivorship of all cementless cups, but without statistically significant differences. When just the cup was revised, the subject system survivorship was similar to survivorship for all cementless cups for years 1 through 6 (Figure 2). Patients with the subject system implanted for an average of 5.73 – 5.75 years reported average Oxford Hip, EQ-5D, and EQ VAS Scores of 39.13 ± 9.93, 0.775 ± 0.273, and 75.87 ± 17.71, respectively. Conclusions. The subject acetabular cup was associated with survivorship similar to that of other cementless acetabular cups. Patients implanted with the subject system for at least five years reported what are considered satisfactory Oxford Hip, EQ5D, and EQVAS score outcomes. These results represent the first report of midterm outcomes with the subject system. For figures/tables, please contact authors directly.

Objectives. Total hip replacement is increasingly being conducted in younger and more active patients, so surgeons often use bearing surfaces with improved wear characteristics, such as ceramic on ceramic. The primary objective of this study was to determine if survivorship for a BIOLOX® delta ceramic on delta ceramic couple used with the PROCOTYL® L acetabular cup is significantly different from all other cementless cups in a large arthroplasty registry. The secondary objective of this study was to analyze patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) of the subject cup with a minimum five year follow-up. Methods. Patient demographics and survivorship data was collected from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man (NJR) database for all total hip replacements performed with the PROCOTYL® L cup used in combination with a delta-on-delta articulation, as well as for all other cementless cups. Survivorship data was compared for all revisions and cup revisions only and data was adjusted to exclude metal on metal articulations. The hazard ratio of the subject system to all cementless cups was also calculated with the Cox Proportional Hazards model. Patients with the subject components implanted for a minimum of five years completed Oxford Hip, EQ-5D, and EQ VAS score questionnaires. Results. The patient demographic data collected for the subject components and all cementless cups is provided in Figure 1. Six-year survivorship for the subject cup (98.6%) was similar to survivorship for all cementless cup revisions in the NJR database (98.5%), as seen in Figure 2. When the cup alone was revised, six-year survivorship of the subject cup (98.6%) and all NJR cementless cups (98.5%) was also similar. However, the subject cup survivorship remained at 98.6% from 4 to 6 years post-implantation, while survivorship for all cementless cups decreased slightly from years 4 to 6. The similarities between the revision risk of the subject system and all cementless cups in the NJR can be seen in the Cox Proportional Hazards model for revision risk ratios provided in Figure 3. Patients with the subject cup implanted for an average of 5.88 years reported Oxford Hip, EQ-5D, and EQ VAS scores of 39.60 ± 10.78, 0.801 ± 0.259, and 75.49 ± 19.25, respectively. Conclusions. The subject acetabular cup with a ceramic on ceramic articulation exhibited similar survivorship to all other cementless acetabular cups, excluding those with metal on metal bearings, in the NJR. Patients implanted with the subject system for an average of 5.88 years reported what are considered satisfactory Oxford Hip, EQ-5D, and EQ VAS scores. This survivorship and PROMs data is the first report of mid-term outcomes with the subject components

Introduction:. Young patients have been reported to have a higher risk of revision following total hip arthroplasty (THA) than older cohorts, possibly to due higher activity and a higher incidence of deformity and prior surgery. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces have been proposed for use in young and active individuals due to their low wear, low risk of adverse biologic reaction, and long-term survivorship. We assessed the clinical results and long-term survivorship of uncemented ceramic-on-ceramic THA in a young patient population. Methods:. 341 total hip arthroplasties in 218 patients under 50 years of age at the time of surgery were performed were performed using alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings from August 1999 to April 2009 as part of a prospective nonrandomized study. All patients received uncemented acetabular components with flush-mounted acetabular liners using an 18 degree taper and uncemented femoral components. The average patient age at the time of surgery was 41.7 years (range 17.8–49.9 years). The minimum follow-up time was 2 years, (mean 9.1, range 2–13.9). We evaluated implant-related complications and performed Kaplan-Meier analyses to determine survivorship of the femoral and acetabular components with revision for any reason as the endpoint. Results:. There were no dislocations or failures due to osteolysis or aseptic loosening. The 13-year survivorship of all components was 95.9% (CI 91.0–98.2). The 13-year survivorship was 97.4% (CI 92.3–99.1) for the acetabular component and 98.5% (CI 95.3–99.5) for the femoral component. There were two liner fractures (0.59%) and one head fracture (0.3%), two of which were sustained as a result of a fall from significant height. There were three failures of osseointegration (0.88%), and one acetabular component dislodged (0.3%) immediately following surgery. Two patients reported nonreproducible squeaking. One hip was revised at an outside institution for unknown reasons. In conclusion, ceramic-on-ceramic THA in the young patient population is very reliable with a low revision rate and absence wear-related osteolysis. Component fracture typically occurs with high-energy trauma, and squeaking occurrence is rare in the flush-mounted ceramic liners used in our study. Conclusion. Total hip arthroplasty in young patients demonstrates excellent survivorship when uncemented titanium implants are coupled with ceramic-ceramic bearings

This paper reports the clinical outcomes and survivorship of a prospective series of Advantim cementless TKR performed at the RAH between 1993 and 2005. There were 210 knees in 176 patients. All procedures were performed or supervised by a single surgeon. All patients were followed up at regular intervals, up to 15 years later, with Knee Society Cinical Rating System and X-Rays. No patients were lost to follow-up. The knee rating improved from a median of 47 to 90. The median range of motion was 0–100. At 11 years the survivorship of the tibial component was 95.5% and femur was 93.7%. There were two major revisions and three minor revisions for polyethelene exchange. There was no deep sepsis. There was no knee stiffness requiring arhrolysis or manipulation. No screw osteolysis observed. Advantim was the best perfoming TKR in the AOA registry in 2008 with 0.3 revisions per 100 observed component years. Conclusions. Advantim has excellent clinical outcomes and survivorship. Screws provide rigid initial and ongoing stability to tibial implant-bone construct. Screw osteolysis should not be a concern in a good implant design