To determine risk factors of infection in total knee arthroplasty. This descriptive study was conducted in the Department of Orthopedics for a duration of three years from January 2016 to January 2019. All patients undergoing primary total knee replacement were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were all patients operated in another hospital and revision total knee replacement. All patients were followed up at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks post-operatively. Signs of inflammation and inflammatory markers such as total leukocyte count (TLC), C-reactive protein (CRP) and ESR were measured. Risk factors like age, body mass index (BMI), ASA, co-morbid conditions were also noted. A total of 78 patients underwent primary unilateral Total Knee Replacement (TKR) during the study period. Of these, 30 (34.09%) were male and 48 (61.54%) female patients. Mean age of patients was 68.32 ± 8.54 years. Average BMI 25.89 Kg/m2 .Osteoarthritis was the pre-dominant cause of total knee replacement (94.87%). Among co-morbid factors 33.33% were diabetic, 28.20% having ischemic heart disease and 12.82% with chronic lung disease. Upon anaesthesia fitness pre-operatively, 91.02% patients had an American society of anaesthesiologist score (ASA) between 0–2 while 07 (8.97%) between 3- 5. Average duration of surgery was 85.62± 4.11 minutes. 6.41% cases got infected. In majority of the infected cases (60%), Staphylococcus aureus was the infective organism. Diabetes Mellitus (p=0.01) and Obesity (p=0.02) had a significant relation to post-operative infection. Pre-operative risk evaluation and prevention strategies along with early recognition of infection and control can greatly reduce the risk of joint infection post-TKR which will not only improve the mobility of patient but also its morbidity and mortality as well. Key Words:. C-reactive protein (CRP), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), Staphylococcus aureus, Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)

To determine the risk of total knee replacement (TKR) for primary osteoarthritis (OA) associated with overweight/obesity in the Australian population. This population-based study analyzed 191,723 cases of TKR collected by the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Registry and population data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The time-trend change in incidence of TKR relating to BMI was assessed between 2015-2018. The influence of obesity on the incidence of TKR in different age and gender groups was determined. The population attributable fraction (PAF) was then calculated to estimate the effect of obesity reduction on TKR incidence. The greatest increase in incidence of TKR was seen in patients from obese class III. The incidence rate ratio for having a TKR for obesity class III was 28.683 at those aged 18-54 years but was 2.029 at those aged >75 years. Females in obesity class III were 1.7 times more likely to undergo TKR compared to similarly classified males. The PAFs of TKR associated with overweight or obesity was 35%, estimating 12,156 cases of TKR attributable to obesity in 2018. The proportion of TKRs could be reduced by 20% if overweight and obese population move down one category. Obesity has resulted in a significant increase in the incidence of TKR in the youngest population in Australia. The impact of obesity is greatest in the young and the female population. Effective strategies to reduce the national obese population could potentially reduce 35% of the TKR, with over 10,000 cases being avoided

Fractures of the prosthetic components after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are rare but dangerous complications, sometimes difficult to diagnose and to manage. Aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of component breakage and its treatment in our single institution's experience. We retrospectively review our institution registry. From 605 revision knee arthroplasties since 2000 to 2018, we found 8 cases of component breakage, of these 3 belonged to UKA, and 5 belonged to TKA. The UKA fractures were all on the metal tibial component; while 4 TKA fractures were ascribed to the liner (2 Posterior-Stabilized designs and 2 constrained designs) and only one case was on the femoral component. For every patient a revision procedure was performed, in two cases a tibial tubercle osteotomy was performed, while in one case (where the fracture was of the post cam) an arthroscopy was performed prior to the arthrotomy. All of the UKA fractures were treated with a standard revision implant. As regard the TKA, 2 liner fractures were treated with the only liner exchange, while the other 2 liner fractures and the fracture of the metallic component were treated with total knee revision. No intra- and post-operative complications were found. Component breakage after TKA is a serious complication. Its treatment, always surgical, can hide pitfalls, especially if the timing is not correct; indeed apart from the revision of one or more components, the surgeons must address any issues of management of bone defect and ligamentous stability

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) improves the quality of life of osteoarthritic and rheumatoid arthritis patients, however, is associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain. There are multiple methods of managing postoperative pain that include epidural anesthesia but it prevents early mobilization and results in postoperative hypotension and spinal infection. Controlling local pain pathways through intra-articular administration of analgesics is a novel method and is inexpensive and simple. Hence, we assess the effects of postoperative epidural bupivacaine injection along with intra-articular injection in total knee replacement patients. The methodology included 100 patients undergoing TKA randomly divided into two groups, one administered with only epidural bupivacaine injection and the other with intra-articular cocktail injection. The results were measured based on a 10-point pain assessment scale, knee's range of motion (ROM), and Lysholm knee score. The VAS score was lower in the intra-articular cocktail group compared to the bupivacaine injection group until the end of 1-week post-administration (p<0.01). Among inter-group comparisons, we observed that the range of motion was significantly more in cocktail injection as compared to the bupivacaine group till the end of one week (p<0.05). Lysholm's score was significantly more in cocktail injection as compared to the bupivacaine group till the end of one week (p<0.05). Our study showed that both epidural bupivacaine injection and intra-articular injection were effective in reducing pain after TKA and have a comparable functional outcome at the end of 4 weeks follow up. However, the pain relief was faster in cases with intra-articular injection, providing the opportunity for early rehabilitation. Thus, we recommend the use of intra-articular cocktail injection for postoperative management of pain after total knee arthroplasty, which enables early rehabilitation and faster functional recovery of these patients

Purpose. To compare postoperative clinical outcomes between posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retaining and resecting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using same cruciate-substituting (CS) inserts, and to elucidate the clinical relevance of the residual PCL in cruciate-retaining TKA, considering intraoperative influence factors, such as the posterior tibial slope, posterior condylar offset, joint gap, joint balance, and joint laxity. Methods. A total of 64 consecutive knees (44 patients) were enrolled in this study and divided into following two groups: 39 knees underwent PCL-retaining TKA group (CR group), and 25 underwent PCL-resecting TKA group (CS group). Preoperative patients’ demographic data and one-year postoperative clinical outcomes including range of motion, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) were compared between two groups. Results. Regarding range of motion, the average preoperative ROM was -14.3/120.0 degrees in the CR group and improved to -2.4/118.9 degrees postoperatively. In the CS group, the average preoperative ROM was -7.5/130 degrees and changed to -2.2/122.4 degrees postoperatively. There was no significant difference in the postoperative ROM between the groups (P=0.16). The KOOS (from 47.1 to 69.5 in CR group; from 41.1 to 70.8 in CS group) and JOA scores (from 59.2 to 76.9 in CR group; from 55.6 to 80.8 in CS group) were significantly improved postoperatively in both groups (P < 0.01). However, there was no significance in these postoperative scores between two groups (P = 0.09). There was also no significance in FJS-12 between two groups (70.3 in CR group and 66.9 in CS group; P=0.53). Conclusions. Residual PCL in TKA with a CS insert would not impact one-year postoperative clinical outcomes including KOOS, JOA, and FJS-12

Total knee replacement (TKR) design aims to restore normal kinematics with emphasis on flexion range. The survivorship of a TKR is dependent on the kinematics in six-degrees-of-freedom (6-DoF). Stepping up, such as stair ascent is a kinematically demanding activity after TKR. The debate about design choice has not yet been informed by 6-DoF in vivo kinematics. This prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) compared kneeling kinematics in three TKR designs. 68 participants were randomised to receive either cruciate retaining (CR-FB), rotating platform (CR-RP) or posterior stabilised (PS-FB) prostheses. Image quality was sufficient for 49 of these patients to be included in the final analysis following a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patients completed a step-up task while being imaged using single-plane fluoroscopy. Femoral and tibial computer-aided design (CAD) models for each of the TKR designs were registered to the fluoroscopic images using bespoke software OrthoVis to generate six-degree-of-freedom kinematics. Differences in kinematics between designs were compared as a function of flexion. There were no differences in terminal extension between the groups. The CR-FB was further posterior and the CR-RP was more externally rotated at terminal extension compared to the other designs. Furthermore, the CR-FB designs was more posteriorly positioned at each flexion angle compared to both other designs. Additionally, the CR-RP design had more external femoral rotation throughout flexion when compared with both fixed bearing designs. However, there were no differences in total rotation for either step-up or down. Visually, it appears there was substantial variability between participants in each group, indicating unique patient-specific movement patterns. While use of a specific implant design does influence some kinematic parameters, the overall patterns are similar. Furthermore, there is high variability indicating patient-specific kinematic patterns. At a group level, none of these designs appear to provide markedly different step-up kinematic patterns. This is important for patient expectations following surgery. Future work should aim to better understand the unique patient variability

Abstract. Objectives. Stiffness is reported in 4%–16% of patients after having undergone total knee replacement (TKR). Limitation to range of motion (ROM) can limit a patient's ability to undertake activities of daily living with a knee flexion of 83. o. , 93. o. , and 106. o. required to walk up stairs, sit on a chair, and tie one's shoelaces respectively. The treatment of stiffness after TKR remains a challenge. Many treatment options are described for treating the stiff TKR. In addition to physiotherapy the most employed of these is manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA). MUA accounts for up to 36% of readmissions following TKR. Though frequently undertaken the outcomes of MUA remain variable and unpredictable. CPM as an adjuvant therapy to MUA remains the subject of debate. Combining the use of CPM after MUA in theory adds the potential benefits of CPM to those of MUA potentially offering greater improvements in ROM. This paper reports a retrospective study comparing patients who underwent MUA with and without post-operative CPM. Methods. Standard practice in our institution is for patients undergoing MUA for stiff TKR to receive CPM for between 12–24hours post-operatively. Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic hospital admissions were limited. During this period several MUA procedures were undertaken without subsequent inpatient CPM. We retrospectively identified two cohorts of patients treated for stiff TKR: group 1) MUA + post-operative CPM 2) Daycase MUA. All patients had undergone initial physiotherapy to try and improve their ROM prior to proceeding to MUA. In addition to patients’ demographics pre-manipulation ROM, post-MUA ROM, and ROM at final follow-up were recorded for each patient. Results. In total 168 patients who had undergone MUA between 2017–2022 were identified with a median Age of 66.5 years and 64% female. 57% had extension deficit (>5. o. ), 70% had flexion deficit (< 90. o. ), and 37% had both. 42 had daycase MUA without CPM and the remaining 126 were admitted for post-operative CPM. The mean Pre-operative ROM was 72.3. o. (SD:18.3. o. ) and 68.5. o. (19.0. o. ) for the daycase and CPM groups respectively. The mean ROM recorded at MUA was 95.5. o. (SD:20.7. o. ) and 108.3. o. (SD:14.1. o. ) [p<0.01] and at final follow-up was 87.4o (SD:21.9o) and 92.1o (SD:18.2o) for daycase and CPM groups respectively. At final follow-up for the daycase and CPM groups respectively 10% vs. 7% improved, 29% vs. 13% maintained, and 57% vs. 79% regressed from the ROM achieved at MUA. The mean percentage of ROM gained at MUA maintained at final follow-up was 92% (SD:17%) and 85% (SD:14%) [p=0.03] for daycase and CPM groups respectively. Conclusion. Overall, there was no significant difference in ROM achieved at final follow-up despite the significantly greater improvement in ROM achieved at MUA for the CPM group. Analysis of the percentage ROM gained at MUA maintained at follow up showed that most patients regressed from ROM achieved at MUA in both groups with those in the CPM only maintaining 85% as opposed to 92% in the daycase patients. It is our observation that post-operative CPM does not improve ROM achieved after MUA as compared to MUA alone. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Abstract. Objective. Up to 20% of patients can remain dissatisfied following TKR. A proportion of TKRs will need early revision with aseptic loosening the most common. The ATTUNE TKR was introduced in 2011 as successor to its predicate design The PFC Sigma (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, In). However, following reports of early failures of the tibial component there have been ongoing concerns of increased loosening rates with the ATTUNE TKR. In 2017 a redesigned tibial baseplate (S+) was introduced, which included cement pockets and an increased surface roughness to improve cement bonding. Given the concerns of early tibial loosening with the ATTUNE knee system, this study aimed to compare revision rates and those specific to aseptic loosening of the ATTUNE implant in comparison to an established predicate as well as other implant designs used in a high-volume arthroplasty centre. Methods. The Attune TKR was introduced to our unit in December 2011. Prior to this we routinely used a predicate design with an excellent long-term track record (PFC Sigma) which remains in use. In addition, other designs were available and used as per surgeon preference. Using a prospectively maintained database, we identified 10,202 patients who underwent primary cemented TKR at our institution between 01/04/2003–31/03/2022 with a minimum of 1 year follow-up (Mean 8.4years, range 1–20years): 1) 2406 with ATTUNE TKR (of which 557 were S+) 2) 4652 with PFC TKR 3) 3154 with other cemented designs. All implants were cemented using high viscosity cement. The primary outcome measures were all-cause revision, revision for aseptic loosening, and revision for tibial loosening. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression models were used to compare the primary outcomes between groups. Matched cohorts were selected from the ATTUNE subsets (original and S+) and PFC groups using the nearest neighbor method for radiographic analysis. Radiographs were assessed to compare the presence of radiolucent lines in the Attune S+, standard Attune, and PFC implants. Results. At a mean of 8.4 years follow-up, 308 implants underwent revision equating to 3.58 revisions per 1000 implant-years. The lowest risk of revision was noted in the ATTUNE cohort with 2.98 per 1000-implant-years where the PFC and All Other Implant groups were 3.15 and 4.4 respectively. Aseptic loosing was the most common cause for revision across all cemented implants with 76% (65/88) of involving loosening of the tibia. Survival analysis comparing the ATTUNE cohort to the PFC and All Other Cemented Implant cohorts showed no significant differences for: all-cause revision, aseptic loosening, or tibial loosening (p=0.15,0.77,0.47). Radiolucent lines were detected in 4.6%, 5.8%, and 5.0% of the ATTUNE S+, standard ATTUNE, and PFC groups respectively. These differences were not significant. Conclusion. This study represents the largest non-registry review of the original and S+ ATTUNE TKR in comparison to its predicate design as well as other cemented implants. There appears to be no significant increased revision rate for all-cause revision or aseptic loosening. Radiographic analysis also showed no significant difference in peri-implant radiolucency. It appears that concerns of early loosening may be unfounded. Declaration of Interest. (a) fully declare any financial or other potential conflict of interest

Objectives. To define Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for the Oxford hip score (OHS) and Oxford knee score (OKS) at mid-term follow-up. Methods. In a prospective multicentre cohort study, OHS and OKS were collected at a mean follow-up of three years (1.5 to 6.0), combined with a numeric rating scale (NRS) for satisfaction and an external validation question assessing the patient’s willingness to undergo surgery again. A total of 550 patients underwent total hip replacement (THR) and 367 underwent total knee replacement (TKR). Results. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves identified a PASS threshold of 42 for the OHS after THR and 37 for the OKS after TKR. THR patients with an OHS ≥ 42 and TKR patients with an OKS ≥ 37 had a higher NRS for satisfaction and a greater likelihood of being willing to undergo surgery again. Conclusions. PASS thresholds appear larger at mid-term follow-up than at six months after surgery. With- out external validation, we would advise against using these PASS thresholds as absolute thresholds in defining whether or not a patient has attained an acceptable symptom state after THR or TKR. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:7–13

Patients with Paget's Disease of Bone (PDB) more frequently require total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, controversy remains regarding their outcome. This project aims to evaluate the current literature regarding outcomes following THA and TKA in PDB patients. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched on February 15th, 2022. Inclusion criteria comprised studies evaluating outcomes following THA/TKA in PDB patients. Quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. 19 articles (published between 1976–2022) were included, comprising 58,695 patients (48,766 controls and 10,018 PDB patients), from 209 potentially relevant titles. No study was of high quality. PDB patient pooled mortality was 32.5% at mean 7.8(0.1-20) years following THA and 31.0% at mean 8.5(2-20) years following TKA. PDB patient revision rate was 4.4% at mean 7.2(0-20) years following THA and 2.2% at mean 7.4(2-20) years following TKA. Renal complications, respiratory complications, heterotopic ossification, and surgical site infection were the most common medical and surgical complications. The largest systematic review, to date, evaluating outcomes following THA and TKA in PDB patients. All functional outcome scores improved. PDB patient revision rate was comparable to UK National Joint Registry. However, there is a significant need for prospective matched case-control studies to robustly compare outcomes in PDB patients with unaffected counterparts

Mechanical alignment (MA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), although considered the gold standard, reportedly has up to 25% of patients expressing post-operative dissatisfaction. Biomechanical outcomes following kinematic alignment (KA) in TKA, developed to restore native joint alignment, remain unclear. Without a clear consensus for the optimal alignment strategy during TKA, the purpose of this study was to conduct a paired biomechanical comparison of MA and KA in TKA by experimentally quantifying joint laxity and medial collateral ligament (MCL) strain. 14 bilateral native fresh-frozen cadaveric lower limbs underwent medially-stabilised TKA (GMK Sphere, Medacta, Switzerland) using computed CT-based subject-specific guides, with KA and MA performed on left and right legs, respectively. Each specimen was subjected to sensor-controlled mediolateral laxity tests. A handheld force sensor (Mark-10, USA) was used to generate an abduction-adduction moment of 10Nm at the knee at fixed flexion angles (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°). A digital image correlation system was used to compute the strain on the superficial medial collateral ligament. A six-camera optical motion capture system (Vicon MX+, UK) was used to acquire kinematics using a pre-defined CT-based anatomical coordinate system. A linear mixed model and Tukey's posthoc test were performed to compare native, KA and MA conditions (p<0.05). Unlike MA, medial joint laxity in KA was similar to the native condition; however, no significant difference was found at any flexion angle (p>0.08). Likewise, KA was comparable with the native condition for lateral joint laxity, except at 30°, and no statistical difference was observed. Although joint laxity in MA seemed lower than the native condition, this difference was significant only for 30° flexion (p=0.01). Both KA and MA exhibited smaller MCL strain at 0° and 30°; however, all conditions were similar at 60° and 90°. Medial and lateral joint laxity seemed to have been restored better following KA than MA; however, KA did not outperform MA in MCL strain, especially after mid-flexion. Although this study provides only preliminary indications regarding the optimal alignment strategy to restore native kinematics following TKA, further research in postoperative joint biomechanics for load bearing conditions is warranted

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to alleviate pain and restore joint biomechanics to an equivalent degree to age-matched peers. Zimmer Biomet's Nexgen TKA was the most common implant in the UK between 2003 and 2016. This study compared the biomechanical outcomes of the Nexgen implant against a cohort of healthy older adults to determine whether knee biomechanics is restored post-TKA. Patients with a primary Nexgen TKA and healthy adults >55 years old with no musculoskeletal deficits or diagnosis of arthritis were recruited locally. Eligible participants attended one research appointment. Bilateral knee range of motion (RoM) was assessed with a goniometer. A motorised arthrometer (GENOUROB) was then used to quantify the anterior-posterior laxity of each knee. Finally, gait patterns were analysed on a treadmill. An 8-camera Vicon motion capture system generated the biomechanical model. Preliminary statistical analyses were performed in SPSS (α = 0.05; required sample size for ongoing study: n=21 per group). The patient cohort (n=21) was older and had a greater BMI than the comparative group (n=13). Patients also had significantly poorer RoM than healthy older adults. However, there were no inter-group differences in knee laxity, walking speed or cadence. Gait kinematics were comparable in the sagittal plane during stance phase. Peak knee flexion during swing phase was lower in the patient group, however (49.0° vs 41.1°). Preliminary results suggest that knee laxity and some spatiotemporal and kinematic parameters of gait are restored in Nexgen TKA patients. While knee RoM remains significantly poorer in the patient cohort, an average RoM of >110° was achieved. This suggests the implant provides sufficient RoM for most activities of daily living. Further improvements to knee kinematics may necessitate additional rehabilitation. Future recruitment drives will concentrate on adults over the age of 70 for improved inter-group comparability

Abstract. Objectives. Obesity is prevalent with nearly one third of the world's population being classified as obese. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment option for high BMI patients achieving similar outcomes to non-obese patients. However, increased rates of aseptic loosening in patients with a high BMI have been reported. In patients with high BMI/body mass there is an increase in strain placed on the implant fixation interfaces. As such component fixation is a potential concern when performing TKA in the obese patient. To address this concern the use of extended tibial stems in cemented implants or cementless fixation have been advocated. Extend tibial stems are thought to improve implant stability reducing the micromotion between interfaces and consequently the risk of aseptic loosening. Cementless implants, once biologic fixation is achieved, effectively integrate into bone eliminating an interface. This retrospective study compared the use of extended tibial stems and cementless implants to conventional cemented implants in high BMI patients. Methods. From a prospectively maintained database of 3239 primary Attune TKA (Depuy, Warsaw, Indiana), obese patients (body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m²) were retrospectively reviewed. Two groups of patients 1) using a tibial stem extension [n=162] and 2) cementless fixation [n=163] were compared to 3) a control group (n=1426) with a standard tibial stem cemented implant. All operations were performed by or under the direct supervision of specialist arthroplasty surgeons. Analysis compared the groups with respect to class I, II, and III (BMI >30kg/m², >35 kg/m², >40 kg/m²) obesity. The primary outcome measures were all-cause revision, revision for aseptic loosening, and revision for tibial loosening. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression models were used to compare the primary outcomes between groups. Where radiographic images at greater than 3 months post-operatively were available, radiographs were examined to compare the presence of peri-implant radiolucent lines. Results. The mean follow-up of 4.8, 3.4, and 2.5 years for cemented, stemmed, and cementless groups respectively. In total there were 34 all-cause revisions across all the groups with revision rates of 4.55, 5.50, and 0.00 per 1000-implant-years for cemented, stemmed, and cementless groups respectively. Survival Analysis did not show any significant differences between the three groups for all-all cause revision. There were 6 revisions for aseptic loosening (5 tibial and 1 femoral); all of which were in the standard cemented implant group. In contrast there were no revisions in the stemmed or cementless implant groups, however, this was not significant on survival analysis. Analysis looking at class I, II, and III obesity also did not show any significant differences in survival for all cause revision or aseptic loosening. Conclusion. This retrospective analysis showed that there were no revisions required for aseptic loosening when either a cemented stemmed or cementless implant were used in obese patients. These findings are in line with other studies showing that cementless fixation or extended stem implants are a reasonable option in obese patients who represent an increasing cohort of patients requiring TKR. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

The study compared thigh-shank and shank-foot coordination during gait before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with controls (CTRL). Twenty-seven patients (male=15/female=12; age=63.2±6.9 years) were evaluated one month prior to and twelve months after surgery, and compared to 27 controls (male=14/female=13; age=62.2±4.3). The participants were outfitted with a full-body marker set. Gait speed (normalized by leg length) was calculated. The time series of the thigh, shank, and foot orientation in relation to the laboratory coordinate system were extracted. The coordination between the thigh-shank and shank-foot in the sagittal plane were calculated using a vector coding technique. The coupling angles were categorized into four coordination patterns. The stance phase was divided into thirds: early, mid, and late stance. The frequency of each pattern and gait speed were compared using a one-way ANOVA with a post-hoc Bonferroni correction. Walking speed and shank-foot coordination showed no differences between the groups. The thigh-shank showed differences. The pre-TKA group showed a more in-phase pattern compared to the CTRL group during early-stance. During mid-stance, the pre- and post-TKA presented a more in-phase pattern compared to the CTRL group. Regarding shank-foot coordination, the groups presented an in-phase and shank pattern, with more shank phase during mid-stance and more in-phase during late-stance. The pre-TKA group showed greater differences than the post-TKA compared to the controls. The more in-phase pattern in the pre- and post-TKA groups could relate to a reduced capacity for the thigh that leads the movement. During mid-stance in normal gait, the knee is extending, where the thigh and shank movements are in opposite directions. The in-phase results in the TKA groups indicate knee stiffness during the stance phase, which may relate to a muscular deficit or a gait strategy to reduce joint stress

Introduction. There is a lack of evidence-based treatments for patients with chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is well-established that knee extensor and flexor muscle strength are markedly impaired following TKA, but no studies have examined muscle strength and power in patients with chronic pain after TKA. Therefore, the aim was to investigate if neuromuscular exercises and pain neuroscience education (PNE) were superior to PNE alone for improvement of muscle strength and power in patients with chronic pain after TKA. Method. This report presents the exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial (NCT03886259). Participants with chronic moderate-to-severe average daily pain intensity and no signs of prosthesis failure at least one year after primary TKA were included. Participants were randomized to receive either supervised neuromuscular exercise and PNE or the same PNE sessions alone. The outcomes were changes from baseline to 12-months for peak leg extension power and maximum muscle strength, measured during maximal voluntary isometric contractions, for the knee extensors and flexors. Result. Sixty-nine participants (age 62.2±7.2, 40 females) were included. No between-group differences were observed for peak leg extension power (difference 13.6 Watts, 95% CI -22.2 to 49.3), maximum knee extensor muscle strength (difference -20.9 Newtons, 95% CI -65.8 to 24.0) or maximum knee flexor muscle strength (difference 8.6 Newtons, 95% CI -11.9 to 29.1). Peak leg extension power (26.3 Watts, 95% CI 4.3 to 48.3) and maximum knee flexor muscle strength (19.7 Newtons, 95% CI 7.6 to 31.9) improved significantly in the neuromuscular exercise and PNE group with no significant improvements observed in the PNE alone group. Conclusion. Neuromuscular exercise and PNE did not improve muscle strength and power compared to PNE alone in patients with chronic pain after TKA. Acknowledgements. This study was funded by the Danish Rheumatism Association, the Svend Andersen Foundation and Lions Club Denmark

Introduction and Objective. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a frequently and increasingly performed surgery in the treatment of disabling knee osteoarthritis. The rising number of procedures and related revisions pose an increasing economic burden on health care systems. In an attempt to lower the revision rate due to component malalignment and soft tissue imbalance in TKA, robotic assistance (RA) has been introduced in the operating theatre. The primary objective of this study is to provide the results of a theoretical, preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis of RA TKA. Materials and Methods. A Markov state-transition model was designed to model the health status of sixty-seven-year-old patients in need of TKA due to primary osteoarthritis over a twenty-year period following their knee joint replacement. Transitional probabilities and independent variables were extracted from existing literature. Patients’ state in the transition model was able to change on an annual basis. The main differences between the conventional and RA TKA were the outlier rate in the coronal plane and the cost of the procedure. In RA TKA, it was hypothesized that there were lower revision rates due to a lower outlier rate compared to conventional TKA. Results. The value attributed to the utility both for primary and revision surgery has the biggest impact on the ICER, followed by the rate of successful primary surgery and the cost of RA-technology. Only 2.18–2.34% of the samples yielded from the probabilistic sensitivity analysis proved to be cost-effective (threshold set at $50000/QALY). A calculated surgical volume of at least 191–253 cases per robot per year is needed to prove cost-effective taking the predetermined parameter values into account. Conclusions. Robot-assisted TKA might be a cost-effective procedure compared to conventional TKA if a minimum of 191 cases are performed on a yearly basis, depending on the cost of the robot. The cost-benefit of the robotic TKA surgery is mainly based on a decreased revision rate. This study is based on the assumption that alignment is a predictor of success in total knee arthroplasty. Until there is data confirming the assertion that alignment predicts success robot-assisted surgery cannot be recommended

Introduction. Knee osteoarthritis often causes malalignment and altering bone load. This malalignment is corrected during total knee arthroplasty surgery, balancing the ligaments. Nonetheless, preoperative gait patterns may influence postoperative prosthesis load and bone support. Thus, the purpose is to investigate the impact of preoperative gait patterns on postoperative femoral and tibial component migration in total knee arthroplasty. Method. In a prospective cohort study, 66 patients with primary knee osteoarthritis undergoing cemented Persona total knee arthroplasty were assessed. Preoperative knee kinematics was analyzed through dynamic radiostereometry and motion capture, categorizing patients into four homogeneous gait patterns. The four subgroups were labeled as the flexion group (n=20), the abduction (valgus) group (n=17), the anterior drawer group (n=10), and the tibial external rotation group (n=19). The femoral and tibial component migration was measured using static radiostereometry taken supine on the postoperative day (baseline) and 3-, 12-, and 24- months after surgery. Migration was evaluated as maximum total point motion. Result. Of the preoperatively defined four subgroups, the abduction group with a valgus-characterized gait pattern exhibited the highest migration for both the femoral (1.64 mm (CI95% 1.25; 2.03)) and tibial (1.21 mm (CI95% 0.89; 1.53)) components at 24-month follow-up. For the femoral components, the abduction group migrated 0.6 mm (CI95% 0.08; 1.12) more than the external rotation group at 24 months. For the tibial components, the abduction group migrated 0.43 mm (CI95% 0.16; 0.70) more than the external rotation group at 3 months. Furthermore, at 12- and 24-months follow-up the abduction group migrated 0.39 mm (95%CI 0.04; 0.73) and 0.45 mm (95%CI 0.01; 0.89) more than the flexion group, respectively. Conclusion. A preoperative valgus-characterized gait pattern seems to increase femoral and tibial component migration until 2 years of follow-up. This suggests that the implant fixation depends on load distributions originating from specific preoperative gait patterns

Introduction. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel intraoperative navigation platform for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in restoring native knee joint kinematics and strains in the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) during squatting motions. Method. Six cadaver lower limbs underwent computed tomography scans to design patient-specific guides. Using these scans, bony landmarks and virtual single-line collateral ligaments were identified to provide intraoperative real-time feedback, aided in bone resection, implant alignment, tibiofemoral kinematics, and collateral ligament elongations, using the navigation platform. The specimens were subjected to squatting (35°-100°) motions on a physiological ex vivo knee simulator, maintaining a constant 110N vertical ankle load regulated by active quadriceps and bilateral hamstring actuators. Subsequently, each knee underwent a medially-stabilized TKA using the mechanical alignment technique, followed by a retest under the same conditions used preoperatively. Using a dedicated wand, MCL and LCL insertions—anterior, middle, and posterior bundles—were identified in relation to bone-pin markers. The knee kinematics and collateral ligament strains were analyzed from 3D marker trajectories captured by a six-camera optical system. Result. Both native and TKA conditions demonstrated similar patterns in tibial valgus orientation (Root Mean Square Error (RMSE=1.7°), patellar flexion (RMSE=1.2°), abduction (RMSE=0.5°), and rotation (RMSE=0.4°) during squatting (p>0.13). However, a significant difference was found in tibial internal rotation between 35° and 61° (p<0.045, RMSE=3.3°). MCL strains in anterior (RMSE=1.5%), middle (RMSE=0.8%), and posterior (RMSE=0.8%) bundles closely matched in both conditions, showing no statistical differences (p>0.05). Conversely, LCL strain across all bundles (RMSE<4.6%) exhibited significant differences from mid to deep flexion (p<0.048). Conclusion. The novel intraoperative navigation platform not only aims to achieve planned knee alignment but also assists in restoring native knee kinematics and collateral ligament behavior through real-time feedback. Acknowledgment. This study was funded by Medacta International (Castel San Pietro, Switzerland)

This study examined pre-operative measures to predict post-operative biomechanical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. Twenty-eight patients (female=12/male=16, age=63.6±6.9, BMI=29.9±7.4 kg/m2) with knee osteoarthritis scheduled to undergo TKA were included. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon (GD) with a subvastus approach. Patients visited the gait lab within one-month prior to surgery and 12 months following surgery. At the gait lab, patients completed the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), a timed up and go (TUG), maximum knee flexion and extension strength evaluation, and a walking task. Variables of interest included the five KOOS sub-scores, TUG time, maximum knee flexion and extension strength normalized to body weight, walking speed, and peak knee biomechanics variables (flexion angle, abduction moment, power absorption). A Pearson's correlation was used to identify significantly correlated variables which were then inputted into a multiple regression. No assumption violations for the multiple regression existed for any variables. Pre-operative knee flexion and extension strength, TUG time, and age were used in the multiple regression. The multiple regression model statistically significantly predicted peak knee abduction moment, post-operative walking speed, and post-operative knee flexion strength. All four variables added statistically significantly to the prediction p<.05. Pre-operative KOOS values did not correlate with any biomechanical indicators of post-operative success. Age, pre-operative knee flexion and extension strength, and TUG times predicted peak knee abduction moment, which is associated with medial knee joint loading. These findings stress the importance of pre-surgery condition, as stronger individuals achieved better post-operative biomechanical outcomes. Additionally, younger patients had better outcomes, suggesting that surgeons should not delay surgery in younger patients. This delay in surgery may prevent patients from achieving optimal outcomes. Future studies should utilize a hierarchical multiple regression to identify which variables are most predictive

Stiffness is reported in up to 16% of patients after total knee replacement (TKR). 1. Treatment of stiffness after TKR remains a challenge. Manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) accounts for between 6%-36% of readmissions following TKR. 2,3. The outcomes of MUA remain variable/unpredictable. Post-operative CPM is used as an adjuvant to MUA, potentially offering improved ROM, however, remains the subject of debate. We report a retrospective study comparing MUA with and without post-operative CPM. In our institution patients undergoing MUA to receive CPM post-operatively. Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic hospital admissions were limited. During this period MUA procedures were undertaken without CPM. Two cohorts were included: 1) MUA + post-operative CPM 2) Daycase MUA. Patients’ demographics, pre-manipulation ROM, post-MUA ROM, and ROM at final follow-up were recorded. Between 2017-2022 126 patients underwent MUA and were admitted for CPM and 42 had daycase MUA. The median Age was 66.5 and 64% were female. 57% had extension deficit (>5. o. ), 70% had flexion deficit (< 90. o. ), and 37% had both. The mean Pre-operative ROM was 72.3. o. (SD:18.3. o. ) vs. 68.5. o. (19.0. o. ), ROM at MUA was 95.5. o. (SD:20.7. o. ) vs 108.3. o. (SD:14.1. o. ) [p< 0.01], and at final follow-up 87.4. o. (SD:21.9. o. ) vs. 92.1. o. (SD:18.2. o. ) for daycase and CPM groups respectively. At final follow-up for the daycase and CPM groups respectively 10% vs. 7% improved, 29% vs. 13% maintained, and 57% vs. 79% regressed from the ROM achieved at MUA. The mean percentage of ROM gained at MUA maintained at final follow-up was 92%(SD:17) and 85%(SD:14)[p=0.03] for daycase and CPM groups respectively. There was no significant difference in ROM achieved at final follow-up despite the significantly greater improvement in ROM achieved at MUA for the CPM group. The CPM group lost a greater ROM after MUA (15% vs. 8%). We conclude that post-operative CPM does not improve ROM achieved after MUA