Introduction. Neck and cup impingement resulted in producing larger amount of wear and risk for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. DDH had more complex to adjust combined cup and femoral neck anteversion during surgery. Dislocation is the second most prevalent complication in total hip replacement with a 2–4% incidence. These resulted in significant financial burden to health care system. Sixteen million US dollars or more cost had in Japanese health insurance system every year. Purpose of this study was to evaluate neck-cup impingement with neck changeable M/L taper Kinectiv stem for DDH patients. Materials & Methods. Single surgeon's series were analyzed neck cup impingement of 1152 primary total hip surgeries with DDH. 269 hips in men, surgical approach were 754 mini-one antero-lateral, 284 mini- Watson-Jones, and 114 Hardinge. Acetabular cups were seated 20 degrees anteversion. Kinectiv Stem (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) was inserted manually with standard technique. Femoral head selection was performed 26mm CoCr basis. 32mm were used for 75 years old or more, and 36mm were 80 years or older. First trial was performed with straight type of neck and 26mm femoral head based on preoperative templating. At neck and head trial to evaluated antero-superior impingement with “flex+add.+IR” and postero-inferior impingement with “ext.+add.+ER”. If the neck and cup impingement occurred even if no dislocation, necks were replaced counter version or larger offset. Results. Neck trial was 2 to 3 times during surgery (ave. 1.9). Version was changed 395(33%) cases. Surgeon selected larger offset in 246, 235 longer length, 99 shorter length. Larger offset with longer length were used in 229 (20%), 117 (10%) had larger offsets and shorter length compared to 2D templating before surgery. We had 2 dislocations (0.48%) with10 degree extended lip PE (2/359: 0.56%) and 2 for flat PE liner (2/793: 0.25%) fixed with manual reduction. All were using very short neck (E; minus 4 in length and S; minus 4 in length, plus 4 in offset) with smaller arc of movement type because of tight to redact compared expected proper positions. All dislocated cases were revised with larger femoral head. Our first series of 1500 Versys system with 10 degree extended lips had 0.74% (14/1880) (2004–9) dislocation rate. Kinectiv neck changeable stem had 66% reduction of dislocation rate (p<0.05). Averaged hospital stay was 7 (3–12) days. Discussion. One Kinectiv stem had 60 variety of necks based on 4 mm head center difference. Large amount of variation especially anteverted or retroverted neck selection might reduce neck-cup impingement compared to other straight type of femoral stems. Combined anteversion is very important especially in DDH patients, because of larger femoral anteversion. Proper offset and leg length are also very important issues for any type of patients. This type of stem had more advantages than straight type monolithic stems to reduce wear and dislocation caused by impingement. Care must be taken for reducing impingement with selecting shorter length or offset during surgery. Lower dislocation rate are very effective to health insurance system

Femoral stem design affects periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD), which may impact long term survival of cementless implants in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to examine proximal femoral BMD in three morphologically different uncemented femoral stems designs to investigate whether one particular design resulted in improved preservation of BMDMethods: 119 patients were randomised to receive either a proximally coated dual taper wedge stem, a proximally coated anatomic stem or a fully coated collarless triple tapered stem. All surgeries were performed via the posterior approach with mobilization on the day of surgery. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scans (Lunar iDXA, GE Healthcare, Madison, WI) assessed BMD across the seven Gruen zones pre-operatively, and post-operatively at 6-weeks, 1-year, and 2-years and compared to the unoperated contralateral femur as a control. Patient reported outcome measures of pain, function and health were also included at these corresponding follow-ups. BMD increased in zones one (2.5%), two (17.1%), three (13.0%), five (10%) and six (17.9%) for all stems. Greater preservation of BMD was measured on the lateral cortex (zone 2) for both the dual taper wedge and anatomic stems (p = 0.019). The dual taper wedge stem also demonstrated preservation of BMD in the medial calcar (zone 7) whilst the anatomic and triple taper stem declined in this region, however this was not statistically significant (p = 0.059). BMD decreased on average by 2.1% inthe mid-diaphysis region, distal to the stem tip (zone 4) for all implants. All stems performed equivalently at final follow-up in all patient reported outcome measures. This study demonstrated maintenance of femoral BMD in three different cementless femoral stem designs, with all achieving excellent improvements in patient reported outcomes. There was no significant stress shielding observed, however longer follow-up is required to elucidate the impact of this finding on implant survivorship

Background. A stem sitting proud (SP) or that above the final rasp position remains in some patients who undergo hip replacement using proximally coated tapered wedge stems. Surgeons may face challenges providing the best fit due to unpredictable stem seating. Zimmer Inc. introduced a new rasp to solve this issue but the clinical results of this rasp have not yet been published. Therefore, we aimed to address the following: 1) What is SP incidence using a proximally coated cementless tapered wedge stem? 2) Does the new rasp system improve seating height? 3) What are the risk factors of SP?. Methods. We performed a retrospective study with 338 hips, in which Tri-Lock Bone Preservation Stem (BPS) was used in 181 and M/L Taper stem was used in 157 hips (82 hips before and 75 hips after the new rasp). A positive stem SP was defined as a stem proud height of >2 mm. We analyzed and compared SP incidence in two stems and in M/L Taper stems before and after the new rasp use. Results. Statistical differences were found across mean age, sex, preoperative diagnosis, and Dorr type between the Tri-Lock BPS and M/L Taper stem groups (P < 0.05); however, no significant difference was found within the M/L Taper groups before and after the 0-mm Rasp use. The sitting proud incidence of the stem was 13% (23/181 hips) with a mean height of 3.0 mm (range: 2.1–4.3 mm) in Tri-Lock BPS and was 15% (12/82 hips) in M/L Taper stem before the 0-mm Rasp use with a mean height of 2.8 mm (range: 2.1–4.0 mm). After the 0-mm Rasp use, only 4% (3/75 hips) showed stem sitting proud with a mean height of 2.2 mm (range: 2.1–2.5 mm). There was no significant difference in the sitting proud incidence between the Tri-Lock BPS and M/L Taper stem groups; however, the sitting proud incidence with M/L Taper stem substantially decreased after the 0-mm Rasp use (P = 0.024). According to the results of the univariate analysis, stem sitting proud was significantly higher at high offset (19%) than at standard offset (8%) in the Tri-Lock BPS system (P < 0.043). In the M/L Taper stem, however, there were no significant differences across all variables, including stem offset, between the stem sitting proud and non-proud groups (Tables 3 and 4). Regarding preoperative diagnosis, the sitting proud incidence was lower in fragility fractures in patients aged ≥50 years (0/18 hips) than in other diagnoses (12/64 hips) using M/L Taper stem before the 0-mm Rasp use, but this result was not statistically significant. When multiple logistic regression analysis was performed, the significant risk factor for stem sitting proud was use of the high offset option in Tri-Lock BPS (P = 0.048; OR = 2.474; 95% CI, 1.009–6.063). There was no substantial difference in the sitting proud incidence between the case groups, each consisting of 30 cases. Regarding femoral head offset, short offset was more frequently used in the stem proud group (13% in Tri-Lock BPS and 58% in M/L Taper stem) than in the non-proud group (4% in Tri-Lock BPS and 21% in M/L Taper stem), and there was a significant difference in M/L Taper stem (P = 0.013). The mean postoperative LLD was 3.0 ± 2.9 mm in Tri-Lock BPS, 3.6 ± 3.2 mm in M/L Taper stem before the 0-mm Rasp use, and 2.7 ± 2.3 mm in M/L Taper stem after the 0-mm Rasp use. There was no significant difference in the mean postoperative LLD between the stem proud and non-proud groups regardless of stem type. At a minimum 6-month follow-up, there was no measurable stem subsidence across all cases. Conclusions. The proximally coated cementless tapered wedge stems are associated with potential problems related to stem sitting proud. The newly developed 0-mm Rasp of M/L Taper stem showed significant improvement in initial seating height compared with the conventional rasp system without postoperative stem subsidence. The use of high offset Tri-Lock BPS stem was the only risk factor for stem proud, but its clinical significance remains unknown. Therefore, large-scale multicenter studies should be conducted to determine relevant risk factors for sitting proud of these stems using a conventional rasp system. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Introduction. We have investigated the long-term (minimum follow-up period; 10 years) clinical results of the total hip arthroplasty (THA) using K-MAX HS-3 tapered stem. Materials and Methods. In K-MAX HS-3 THA (Kyocera Medical, Kyoto, Japan), cemented titanium alloy stem and all polyethylene cemented socket are used. This stem has the double tapered symmetrical stem design, allowing the rotational stability and uniform stress distribution. The features of this stem are; 1. Vanadium-free high-strength titanium alloy (Ti-15Mo-5Zr-3Al), 2. Double-tapered design, 3. Smooth surface (Ra 0.4µm), 4. Broad proximal profile, 5. Small collar. Previous type stem, which was made of the same smooth-surface titanium alloy, has the design with cylindrical stem tip, allowing the maximum filling of the femoral canal. Osteolysis at the distal end of the stem had been reported in a few cases in previous type with cylindrical stem tip, probably due to the local stress concentration. Therefore the tapered stem was designed, expecting better clinical results. 157 THAs using HS-3 taper type stem were performed at Kitano Hospital between March 2004 and March 2008. And 101 THAs, followed for more than 10 years, were investigated (follow-up rate; 64.3%). The average age of the patients followed at the operation was 61.7 years and the average follow-up period was 10.9 years. The all-polyethylene socket was fixed by bone cement, and the femoral head material was CoCr (22mm; 5 hips, 26 mm; 96 hips). Results. Two hips were revised, one was due to late infection, and the other due to breakage of the implant in trauma. Japanese orthopaedic association (JOA) score improved from 40 to 86 points. Postoperative complication was three periprosthetic fractures (one femoral shaft fracture and two greater trochanteric fractures) and femoral shaft fracture case was operated. Dislocation was not observed. Socket loosening (Hodgkinson, Type 3, 4) and stem loosening (Harris, definite and probable) were not observed radiographically. Cortical hypertrophy was observed in 7.9%. The survival rate of HS-3 tapered stem was 98% for revision due to any reason and 100% for revision due to aseptic loosening. Discussion. The long-term clinical results of K-MAX HS-3 tapered stem were excellent. The osteolysis at the stem tip was not observed in this type, which was observed in a few cases in previous type. From the X-ray finding, it was suggested that this taperd stem had more uniform stress distribution to the femoral bone than previous type. Moreover, the problems associated with titanium alloy usage were not observed. From the present investigation, good farther long-term results of the tapered titanium stem were expected

Tapered fluted grit-blasted modular stems have now become established as a successful method of femoral revision. The success of these stems is predicated on obtaining axial stability by milling the femur to a cone and then inserting the tapered prosthesis into that cone. Torsional stability is gained by flutes that cut into the diaphysis. By having modular proximal segments of different lengths, the leg length, offset, and anteversion can be adjusted after the distal stem is fixed. This maximises the chance for the stem to be driven into the canal to whatever level provides maximum stem stability. Modular fluted tapered stems have the potential benefits of being made of titanium and hence being both bone friendly and also having a modulus of elasticity closer to that of bone. They have a well-established high rate of fixation. Drawbacks include the risk of fracture of modular junctions and tapers, and difficulty of extraction. The indications for the use of these implants vary among surgeons, but the implants are suitable for use in a wide variety of bone loss categories. Non-modular fluted tapered stems also can gain excellent fixation, but are less versatile and in most practices are used for selected simpler revisions. Results from a number of institutions in North America and Europe demonstrate high rates of implant fixation. In a recently published paper from Mayo Clinic, the 10-year survivorship, free of femoral aseptic loosening revision, of a modular fluted tapered stem was 98% and the stem performed well across a wide range of bone deficiencies. The technique of implantation will be described in a video during the presentation

Clinical success of prostheses in joint arthroplasty is ultimately determined by survivorship and patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to compare (non-inferiority) a new morphometric designed stem for total hip arthroplasty (THA) against an established comparator. A prospective randomised multi-centre study of 144 primary cementless THA performed by nine experienced orthopaedic surgeons was completed (70 received a fully coated collarless tapered stem and 74 received a morphometric designed proximally coated tapered stem). PROMs and blood serum markers were assessed preoperatively and at intervals up to 2-years postoperatively. In addition, measures of femoral stem fit, fill and subsidence at 2-years post-operatively were measured from radiographs by three observers, with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.918. A mixed effects model was employed to compare the two prosthesis over the study period. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Demographics, Dorr types and blood serum markers were similar between groups. Both stems demonstrated a significant improvement in PROMs between the pre- and post-operative measurements, with no difference at any timepoint (p > 0.05). The fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem had a non-significantly higher intra-operative femoral fracture rate (5.8% vs 1.4%, p = 0.24), with all patients treated with cable fixation and partial weight bearing. The mean subsidence at 2-years was 2.5mm +/- 2.3mm for the morphometric stem and 2.4mm +/- 1.8mm for the fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem (p = 0.879). There was one outlier in each group with increased subsidence (fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem 6.9mm, morphometric wedge stem 7.4mm), with both patients reporting thigh pain at 2 years. When compared with an established stem, the newer designed morphometric wedge stem performed well with comparable radiological and PROM outcomes at 2 year follow up. Continued follow-up is required for long term benchmarking

Clinical success of prostheses in joint arthroplasty is ultimately determined by survivorship and patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to compare (non-inferiority) a new morphometric designed stem for total hip arthroplasty (THA) against an established comparator. A prospective randomised multi-centre study of 144 primary cementless THA performed by nine experienced orthopaedic surgeons was completed (70 received a fully coated collarless tapered stem and 70 received a morphometric designed proximally coated tapered stem). PROMs and blood serum markers were assessed preoperatively and at intervals up to 2-years postoperatively. In addition, measures of femoral stem fit, fill and subsidence at 2-years post-operatively were measured from radiographs by three observers, with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.918. A mixed effects model was employed to compare the two prostheses over the study period. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Demographics and Dorr types were similar between groups. Both stems demonstrated a significant improvement in PROMs between the pre- and post-operative measurements, with no difference at any timepoint (p > 0.05). The fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem had a non-significantly higher intra-operative femoral fracture rate (5.8% vs 1.4%, p = 0.24), with all patients treated with cable fixation and partial weight bearing. The mean subsidence at 2-years was 2.5mm +/- 2.3mm for the morphometric stem and 2.4mm +/- 1.8mm for the fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem (p = 0.879). There was one outlier in each group with increased subsidence (fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem 6.9mm, morphometric wedge stem 7.4mm), with both patients reporting thigh pain at 2 years. When compared with an established stem, the newer designed morphometric wedge stem performed well with comparable radiological and PROM outcomes at 2 year follow up. Continued follow-up is required for long term benchmarking

Dual mobility (DM) is an established bearing option in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). The traditional mono-block DM designs have limited ability for additional fixation, whereas the modular DM designs allow additional screw fixation but limit internal diameter and have the potential to generate metal debris. We report the early results of a CoCrMo alloy mono-block implant manufactured by additive technology with a highly porous ingrowth surface to enhance primary fixation and osseointegration. Prospective follow-up of the Duplex. TM. implant first inserted in March 2016 enrolled into Beyond Compliance (BC). Primary outcome measure was all-cause revision and secondary outcomes dislocation, peri-prosthetic fracture (PPF) and Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Patients were risk stratified and all considered to be high risk for instability. Complications were identified via hospital records, clinical coding linkage using national database and via BC website. 159 implants in 154 patients with a mean age 74.0 years and a maximum F/U of 7 years. Survivorship for all-cause revision 99.4% (95% CI 96.2–99.8). One femoral only revision. Mean gain in OHS 27.4. Dislocation rate 0.6% with a single event. Patients with a cemented Polished taper stem (PTS) had a Type B PPF rate of 2.1% requiring revision/fixation. Compared to conventional THA this cohort was significantly older (74.0 vs 68.3 years), more co-morbidity (ASA 3 46.5% vs 14.4%) and more non-OA indications (32.4% vs 8.5%). Every patient had at least one risk factor for falling and >50% of cohort had 4 or more risk factors using NICE tool. We believe our results demonstrate that risk stratification successfully aids implant selection to prevent dislocation in high-risk patients. This novel design has provided excellent early results in a challenging cohort where individuals are very different to the “average” THA patient. NJR data on DM has reported an increase in revision for PPF. A “perfect storm” maybe created using DM in high-risk falls risk population. This re-enforces the need to consider all patient and implant factors when deciding bearing selection

In recent years, cementless stems have dominated the North American market. There are several categories of cementless stems, but in the past 20 years, the two most popular designs in the United States have been the extensively coated cylindrical cobalt-chrome (CoCr) stem and the proximally coated tapered titanium stem, which in recent years has become the most common. The 10-year survival for both stem types has been over 95% with a distinction made on factors other than stem survival, including thigh pain, stress shielding, complications of insertion, and ease of revision. Conventional wisdom holds that proximally coated titanium stems have less stress shielding, less thigh pain, and a higher quality clinical result. Recent studies, however, including randomised clinical trials have found that the incidence of thigh pain and clinical result is essentially equivalent between the stem types, however, there is a modest advantage in terms of stress shielding for a tapered titanium stem over an extensively coated CoCr stem. One study utilizing pain drawings did establish that if a CoCr cylindrical stem was utilised, superior clinical results in terms of pain score and pain drawings were obtained with a fully coated versus a proximally coated stem. In spite of the lack of a clinically proven advantage in randomised trials, tapered titanium stems have been favored because of the occasional occurrence of substantial stress shielding, the increased clinical observation of thigh pain severe enough to warrant surgical intervention, ease of use of shorter tapered stems that involve removal of less trochanteric bone and less risk of fracture both at the trochanter and the diaphysis due to the shorter, and greater ease of insertion through more limited approaches, especially anterior approaches. When tapered stems are utilised, there may be an advantage to a more rectangular stem cross-section in patients with type C bone. In spite of the numerous clinical advantages of tapered titanium stems, there still remains a role for more extensively coated cylindrical stems in patients that have had prior surgery of the proximal femur, particularly for a hip fracture, which makes proximal fixation, ingrowth, and immediate mechanical stability difficult to assure consistently. Cement fixation should also be considered in these cases. While the marketplace and the clinical evidence strongly support routine use of tapered titanium proximally coated relatively short stems with angled rather than straight proximal lateral geometry in the vast majority of cases, there still remains a role for more extensively coated cylindrical and for specific indications

Background. Aseptic loosening is rare with most cementless tapered stems in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), however different factors can modify results. We ask if the shape and technique of three current different femoral components affects the clinical and radiological outcome after a minimum follow-up of ten years. Methods. 889 cementless tapered stems implanted from 1999 to 2007 were prospectively followed. Group 1 (273 hips) shared a conical shape and a porous-coated surface, group 2 (286 hips) a conical splined shape and group 3 (330 hips) a rectangular stem. Clinical outcome and anteroposterior and sagittal radiographic analysis were compared. Femoral type, stem position, femoral canal filling at three levels and the possible appearance of loosening and bone remodelling changes were assessed. Results. No thigh pain was reported in unrevised patients. Mean Harris Hip score was lower for patients in group 3 for pain and function at 6 months, two years and at latest follow-up. The survival rate of not having revision of the stem for any cause was 98.5% (95% CI 98.8–100) for group 1 at 12 years, 99.3 % ((95% Confidence Intervals (CI) 97.9–100) for group 2 at 16 years and 97.7% (95% (CI) 94–100) for group 3 at 14 years, and (log rank= 0.109). Thirteen stems from the latter were revised for aseptic loosening. No revision for aseptic loosening was found in the other designs. After controlling all confounding factors, the risk for aseptic loosening in group 3 was related to a lower femoral canal filling (p=0.039, Hazard Ratio (HR):0.918, 95% Confidence Interval (CI):0.846–0.996) and a stem position outside neutral limits in the sagittal alignment (p=0.048, HR:3.581, 95% CI:1.010–12.696). Conclusions. Conical tapered cementless stems are more reliable than rectangular straight designs in primary THA after ten years

Introduction. We have compared the middle-term (average follow-up period; 10 years) clinical results of the K-MAX HS-3 tapered stem with those of the previous type having cylindrical tip. Materials and Methods. In K-MAX HS-3 THA (Kyocera Medical, Kyoto, Japan), cemented titanium alloy stem and all polyethylene cemented socket are used. This stem has the double tapered symmetrical stem design, allowing the rotational stability and uniform stress distribution (Type T) (Fig. 1). The features of this stem are; 1. Vanadium-free high-strength titanium alloy (Ti-15Mo-5Zr-3Al), 2. Double-tapered design, 3. Smooth surface (Ra 0.4μm), 4. Broad proximal profile, 5. Small collar. In contrast, previous type stem, which was made of the same smooth-surface titanium alloy, has the design with cylindrical stem tip, allowing the maximum filling of the femoral canal (Type C) (Fig. 2). Osteolysis at the distal end of the stem had been reported in a few cases in Type C, probably due to the local stress concentration. Therefore the tapered stem was designed, expecting better clinical results. All surgery was performed at Kitano Hospital between September 2003 and June 2006. 72 THA were performed (Type T; 52 hips, Type C; 20 hips). The average age of the patients at the operation was 61 and 69 years and the average follow-up period was 10.1 and 10.4 years for the Type T and C, respectively. The all-polyethylene socket was fixed by bone cement, and the femoral head material was alumina or CoCr (22 or 26 mm). Results. One hip was revised in Type C. Japanese orthopaedic association (JOA) score improved from 39/37 to 84/77 points (Type T/C). Postoperative complication was dislocation in one case (Type C; 1). Socket loosening was not observed radiographically. Stem loosening was observed in one hip in Type C, demonstrating osteolysis at the distal end of the stem. In this case, revision THA was performed 3.5 years postoperatively. Bone resorption was more frequently observed in Type C than Type T. Cortical hypertrophy was observed in 7.7% in Type T and 25% in Type C. Discussion. The middle-term clinical results of K-MAX HS-3 taper stem (Type T) was excellent. The osteolysis at the stem tip was not observed in this type, which was observed in a few cases in previous Type C. From the X-ray finding, it was suggested that Type T had more uniform stress distribution to the femoral bone than Type C. Moreover, the problems associated with titanium alloy usage were not observed. From the present investigation, good long-term results of the tapered titanium stem (Type T) was expected. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Introduction. There have been many attempts to reduce the risk of femoral component loosening. Using a tapered stem having a highly polished stem surface results in stem stabilization subsequent to debonding and stem-cement taper-lock and is consistent with force-closed fixation design. Purpose. In this study, we assessed the subsidence of two different polished triple tapered stems and two different cements in primary THA. Materials and methods. From March 2013 to March 2014, two kinds of polished triple tapered cemented stem were applied in 74 primary THA. 12 male, 62 female, mean age at surgery was 68 years old, mean F/U time was 12months. When they were compared by stems, this study comprises 35 THA with Trilliance stem(Aesculap, Germany) and 39 THA with SC stem (Kyocera, Japan), and when they were compared by cements, this study comprises 36 Simplex cement (Stryker, USA) cases and 38 Cobalt cement(Biomet, USA) cases. Using digitized x-ray, we measured the subsidence of each implants. Measurements were taken from initial postoperative radiographs to the final follow-up. We also evaluated the existence of radiolucent line between cement and stem and also evaluated calcar resorption. Results. The mean subsidence of Trilliance stem was 0.26mm and of SC stem was 0.44mm at 12months.(P<0.0001) Statistic significance was observed between the stems. When compared between 2 cements, the mean subsidence of Simplex cement was 0.25mm and of Cobalt cement was 0.48mm.(P=0.0563). No statistic significance was observed. There was no case of stem loosening and calcar resorption. Conclusion. 2 different designed cemented triple taper stems showed significantly different degree of subsidence after THA. No difference of subsidence was observed between two cements

In recent years, cementless stems have dominated the North American market. There are several categories of cementless stems, but in the past 20 years, the two most popular designs in the United States have been the extensively coated cylindrical cobalt-chrome (Co-Cr) stem and the proximally coated tapered titanium stem, which in recent years has become the most common. The 10-year survival for both stem types has been over 95% with a distinction made on factors other than stem survival, including thigh pain, stress shielding, complications of insertion, and ease of revision. Conventional wisdom holds that proximally coated titanium stems have less stress shielding, less thigh pain, and a higher quality clinical result. Recent studies, however, including randomised clinical trials have found that the incidence of thigh pain and clinical result is essentially equivalent between the stem types, however, there is a modest advantage in terms of stress shielding for a tapered titanium stem over an extensively coated Co-Cr stem. One study utilising pain drawings did establish that if a Co-Cr cylindrical stem was utilised, superior clinical results in terms of pain score and pain drawings were obtained with a fully coated versus a proximally coated stem. In spite of the lack of a clinically proven advantage in randomised trials, tapered titanium stems have been favored because of the occasional occurrence of substantial stress shielding, the increased clinical observation of thigh pain severe enough to warrant surgical intervention, ease of use of shorter tapered stems that involve removal of less trochanteric bone and less risk of fracture both at the trochanter and the diaphysis due to the shorter, and greater ease of insertion through more limited approaches, especially anterior approaches. When tapered stems are utilised, there may be an advantage to a more rectangular stem-cross section in patients with type C bone. In spite of the numerous clinical advantages of tapered titanium stems, there still remains a role for more extensively coated cylindrical stems in patients that have had prior surgery of the proximal femur, particularly for a hip fracture, which makes proximal fixation, ingrowth, and immediate mechanical stability difficult to assure consistently. Cement fixation should also be considered in these cases. While the marketplace and the clinical evidence strongly support routine use of tapered titanium proximally coated relatively short stems with angled rather than straight proximal lateral geometry in the vast majority of cases, there still remains a role for more extensively coated cylindrical and for specific indications

A novel cementless tapered wedge femoral hip implant has been designed at a reduced length and with a geometry optimized to better fit a wide array of bone types (Accolade II, Stryker, Mahwah, USA). In this study, finite element analysis (FEA) is used to compare the initial stability of the new proposed hip stem to predicate tapered wedge stem designs. A fit analysis was also conducted. The novel stem was compared to a predicate standard tapered stem and a shortened version of that same predicate stem. Methods. The novel shortened tapered wedge stem geometry was designed based on a morphological study of 556 CT scans. We then selected 10 discrete femoral geometries of interest from the CT database, including champagne fluted and stove pipe femurs. The novel and the predicate stems were virtually implanted in the bones in ABAQUS CAE. A total of thirty FEA models were meshed with 4 nodes linear tetrahedral elements. Bone/implant interface properties was simulated with contact surface and a friction coefficient of 0.35. Initial stability of each stem/bone assembly was calculated using stair-climbing loading conditions. The overall initial stability of the HA coated surface was evaluated by comparing the mean rotational, vertical, gap-opening and total micromotion at the proximal bone/implant interface of the novel and predicate stem designs. To characterize the fit of the stem designs we analyzed the ratio of a distal (60 mm below lesser trochanter) and a proximal (10 mm above lesser trochanter) cross section. A constant implantation height of 20 mm above the lesser trochanter was used. The fit of the stems was classified as Type 1 (proximal and distal engagement), Type 2 (proximal engagement only) and Type 3 (distal engagement only). Results. The mean % micromotion of the HA coated surface greater than 50 mm was lowest at 40.2% (SD 11.5%) for the novel tapered wedge stem compared to the clinically successful predicate stem design (Accolade TMAZ, Stryker, Mahwah, USA) at 44.9% (SD 13.2%) and its shortened version at 48.5% (SD 9.0%) as shown in Figure 1. Improved initial stability of the new stem was also confirmed for rotational, vertical and gap-opening micromotion. However, there was no statistically significant difference. The novel tapered stem design showed a well balanced proximal to distal ratio throughout the complete size range. The novel tapered stem design showed a reduced percentage of distal engagements (2.8%) compared to the predicate standard stem (17.2%). In the 40 to 60 year old male group the distal engagement for the standard stem increases (28.2%), whereas the distal engagements for the novel stem remains unchanged (1.3%). Discussion. It appears that through optimization of the novel tapered wedge geometry, a reduced length of a tapered wedge stem can be accomplished without jeopardizing initial stability. This data also shows that simply shortening an existing tapered wedge design may reduce the initial stability, albeit not statistically significant in this model. Optimising the shape of the stem has also significantly reduced the incidence of distal only type fixation in a computer model

Following the recommendation of NICE guidelines (CG124) we have recently started using cemented smooth tapered stem hemiarthroplasty as our standard management of intra-capsular neck of femur fractures. Prior to publication of the above guidelines the standard implant utilised was Thompson Hemiarthroplasty prosthesis. The cost implications of this change have not been fully appreciated and the benefit of these changes in ASA grade 3–4 patients has not previously been analysed. We identified a cohort of 89 patients admitted with displaced intra-capsular neck of femur fracture with an ASA grade 3–4. These underwent hip hemiarthroplaties at our centre over a period of 12 months (before and after guideline implementation). Data regarding in-hospital mortality, dislocation, reoperation and place of discharge were retrospectively collected and analysed. Our cohort included 46 patients who underwent a Thompsons Hemiarthroplasty, 30 patients who had a cemented smooth tapered stem hemiarthroplasty and 13 patients who had an Austin-moore Hemiarthroplasty. In-patient mortality rates were highest in the Austin-moore group, followed by the Thompsons group compared to none in the smooth tapered stem group. However, this was not statistically significant. One patient in the Thompsons group and one patient in the smooth tapered group had multiple dislocations and re-operations, compared with none in the Austin-moore group. In terms of percentage of patients who were discharged home from hospital the smooth tapered stem group had a percentage that was more than twice that of the Thompson's which was in turn higher than that found in the Austin-moore group. In conclusion, our data suggests that in patients with an ASA grade of 3–4 there is no significant benefit from using cemented smooth tapper stems when performing a Hip Hemiarthroplasty compared with a well performed Thompsons and that the cost savings of this is significant. We accept that our current numbers are relatively small and further work is needed

In recent years, cementless stems have dominated the North American market. There are several categories of cementless stems, but in the past 20 years, the two most popular designs in the United States have been the extensively coated cylindrical cobalt-chrome (CoCr) stem and the proximally coated tapered titanium stem, which in recent years has become the most common. The 10 year survival for both stem types has been over 95% with a distinction made on factors other than stem survival, including thigh pain, stress shielding, complications of insertion, and ease of revision. Conventional wisdom holds that proximally coated titanium stems have less stress shielding, less thigh pain, and a higher quality clinical result. Recent studies, however, including randomised clinical trials have found that the incidence of thigh pain and clinical result is essentially equivalent between the stem types, however, there is a modest advantage in terms of stress shielding for a tapered titanium stem over an extensively coated CoCr stem. One study utilising pain drawings did establish that if a CoCr cylindrical stem was utilised, superior clinical results in terms of pain score and pain drawings were obtained with a fully coated versus a proximally coated stem. In spite of the lack of a clinically proven advantage in randomised trials, tapered titanium stems have been favored because of the occasional occurrence of substantial stress shielding, the increased clinical observation of thigh pain severe enough to warrant surgical intervention, ease of use of shorter tapered stems that involves removal of less trochanteric bone and less risk of fracture both at the trochanter and the diaphysis due to the shorter, and greater ease of insertion through more limited approaches, especially anterior approaches. When tapered stems are utilised, there may be an advantage to a more rectangular stem-cross section in patients with type C bone. In spite of the numerous clinical advantages of tapered titanium stems, there still remains a role for more extensively coated cylindrical stems in patients that have had prior surgery of the proximal femur, particularly for a hip fracture, which makes proximal fixation, ingrowth, and immediate mechanical stability difficult to assure consistently. Cement fixation should also be considered in these cases. While the market place and the clinical evidence strongly support routine use of tapered titanium proximally coated relatively short stems with angled rather than straight proximal lateral geometry in the vast majority of cases, there still remains a role for more extensively coated cylindrical and for specific indications

In recent years, cementless stems have dominated the North American market. There are several categories of cementless stems, but in the past 20 years, the two most popular designs in the United States have been the extensively coated cylindrical cobalt-chrome (Co-Cr) stem and the proximally coated tapered titanium stem, which in recent years has become the most common. The 10 year survival for both stem types has been over 95% with a distinction made on factors other than stem survival, including thigh pain, stress shielding, complications of insertion, and ease of revision. Conventional wisdom holds that proximally coated titanium stems have less stress shielding, less thigh pain, and a higher quality clinical result. Recent studies, however, including randomised clinical trials have found that the incidence of thigh pain and clinical result is essentially equivalent between the stem types, however, there is a modest advantage in terms of stress shielding for a tapered titanium stem over an extensively coated Co-Cr stem. One study utilising pain drawings did establish that if a Co-Cr cylindrical stem was utilised, superior clinical results in terms of pain score and pain drawings were obtained with a fully coated versus a proximally coated stem. In spite of the lack of a clinically proven advantage in randomised trials, tapered titanium stems have been favored because of the occasional occurrence of substantial stress shielding, the increased clinical observation of thigh pain severe enough to warrant surgical intervention, ease of use of shorter tapered stems that involve removal of less trochanteric bone and less risk of fracture both at the trochanter and the diaphysis due to the shorter, and greater ease of insertion through more limited approaches, especially anterior approaches. When tapered stems are utilised, there may be an advantage to a more rectangular stem-cross-section in patients with type C bone. In spite of the numerous clinical advantages of tapered titanium stems, there still remains a role for more extensively coated cylindrical stems in patients that have had prior surgery of the proximal femur, particularly for a hip fracture, which makes proximal fixation, ingrowth, and immediate mechanical stability difficult to assure consistently. Cement fixation should also be considered in these cases. While the marketplace and the clinical evidence strongly support routine use of tapered titanium proximally coated relatively short stems with angled rather than straight proximal lateral geometry in the vast majority of cases, there still remains a role for more extensively coated cylindrical and for specific indications

Introduction. Cementless tapered wedge stems have shown excellent results over the last decade. Distal potting with inadequate proximal fit, as well as failure to achieve biologic fixation has led to thigh pain, loosening and implant failure. To support a variety of patient morphologies a novel tapered wedge stem was designed with reduced distal morphology, maximizing the proximal contact of the grit blasted surface. The objective of the study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of this stem design. Methods. Three hundred and nineteen patients enrolled into prospective, post-market multicenter studies received a novel tapered wedge stem. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes including the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS), Short Form 12 (SF12), and Euroqol 5D Score (EQ-5D) were evaluated preoperative through two years postoperative. Results. Demographics of the study population include 53.3% male patients with a mean age of 62.4 ± 9.3 years and BMI of 29.8 ± 4.5. To date, there has been one incidence of thigh pain (0.3%) and a 0.63% aseptic revision rate. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis for the population at two years postoperative estimated 97.87% with 95% CI (93.98% – 99.25%) survivorship to all cause revision (Figure 1). Statistically significant improvements in pain, function, and quality of life were seen initially at six weeks postoperative and continued through one year in all of the clinical and patient reported outcome measures (Figure 2). Conclusion. A novel tapered wedge stem was designed to maximize proximal fit medially and laterally across a variety of patient morphologies. Radiographic studies have shown the stem design has significantly better canal fit compared to older tapered wedge designs. The current study exhibits low incidence of thigh pain and revisions, with improvements in function, pain and quality of life after hip arthroplasty with this tapered wedge stem

While short stem designs are not a new concept, interest has surged with increasing popularity of less invasive techniques. If the goal of the tapered stem is to load preferentially proximally, why do we need a stem at all? Perhaps the only reason to use a tapered, long stem is to prevent varus; however, studies have shown that varus malalignment of a tapered stem does not affect results. Short stems are easier to insert, especially when using an anterior approach such as the anterior supine intermuscular in which the proximal femur is elevated anteriorly from the wound during stem insertion. Femoral preparation can be accomplished with straightforward broaching of the canal, without use of reamers. Short stems are bone conserving. They violate less femoral bone stock, providing more favorable conditions should a revision be required. However, ease of insertion and bone conservation matter little if not supported by clinical results. Thus, we reviewed our early experience with 2094 patients undergoing 2457 primary THA using short, tapered titanium, porous plasma spray-coated femoral components since January 2006 at our center. The TaperLoc Microplasty stem (Biomet, Warsaw, IN) has been used in 1881 THA, and the TaperLoc Complete Microplasty stem (Biomet) in 576. Patient age averaged 63.6 years. Increased offset was used in 1990 hips (81%). The surgical approach was less invasive direct lateral (LIDL) in 1194 THA (49%), anterior supine intermuscular (ASI) in 1117 (46%), and standard direct lateral (Std) in 146 (6%). Follow-up averaged 20 months. Thirty-five stems (1.4%) have been revised: 15 for infection (12 LIDL, 3 ASI), 1 same day revision for intraoperative femoral shaft perforation (Std), 1 at 3 days for patellar dislocation (LIDL), 2 for early subsidence (1 LIDL, 1 ASI), 13 for periprosthetic femoral fracture (1 Std, 12 ASI), 2 for aseptic loosening (1 LIDL, 1 ASI), and 1 stem well fixed (ASI) removed for loose cup and unable to disarticulate trunnion. What lessons have we learned? First, we usually require one or two diameter sizes larger with short porous tapered stem versus the standard length version of the same design. The surgeon should be aggressive with sizing, pushing to the largest size possible. Use the broach like a rasp. Drive the component in valgus during insertion. Upon seating the component, do a trial reduction using the shortest available neck length. The component will generally sit slightly prouder than the broach and may require additional effort to seat completely. Conservation of existing bone stock, compatibility with soft-tissue sparing surgery, more physiologic loading of the proximal femur, and versatility with varying femoral anatomy make the short taper an attractive implant option. The tapered wedge short stem represents the natural evolution of joint arthroplasty to a smaller, less-invasive, and more efficient implant

Background. Although thigh pain is an annoying problem after total hip arthroplasty (THA), little information has been known about its natural course. Methods. To determine the frequency, time of onset, and duration of thigh pain after cementless THA, we evaluated 240 patients (240 hips) who underwent primary THA because of femoral head osteonecrosis with the use of a single tapered stem. Results. Twenty-seven patients (11.3%) experienced thigh pain during the follow-up of 3–11 years(mean, 84 months). The pain developed 2–78 months (median, 25 months) after THA. The 75% of pain developed within 36 months. In 25 patients, the pain disappeared postoperatively 1 month-64 months (mean, 17.4 months), and 2 patients (7.4%, 2/27) had persistent thigh pain. There were no differences in the latest Harris Hip Score between the thigh pain group and no thigh pain group. Conclusion. Our results provided basic information about the natural history of thigh pain after cementless THA with a tapered stem design