Aims. Factors associated with high mortality rates in geriatric hip fracture patients are frequently unmodifiable. Time to surgery, however, might be a modifiable factor of interest to optimize clinical outcomes after hip fracture surgery. This study aims to determine the influence of postponement of surgery due to non-medical reasons on clinical outcomes in acute hip fracture surgery. Methods. This observational cohort study enrolled consecutively admitted patients with a proximal femoral fracture, for which surgery was performed between 1 January 2018 and 11 January 2021 in two level II trauma teaching hospitals. Patients with medical indications to postpone surgery were excluded. A total of 1,803 patients were included, of whom 1,428 had surgery < 24 hours and 375 had surgery ≥ 24 hours after admission. Results. Prolonged total length of stay was found when surgery was performed ≥ 24 hours (median 6 days (interquartile range (IQR) 4 to 9) vs 7 days (IQR 5 to 10); p = 0.001) after admission. No differences in postoperative length of hospital stay nor in 30-day mortality rates were found. In subgroup analysis for time frames of 12 hours each, pressure sores and urinary tract infections were diagnosed more frequently when time to surgery increased. Conclusion. Longer time to surgery due to non-medical reasons was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative pressure sores and urinary tract infections when time to surgery was more than 48 hours after admission. No association was found between time to surgery and 30-day mortality rates or postoperative length of hospital stay. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(12):1369–1378

Aims. Few studies have investigated potential consequences of strained surgical resources. The aim of this cohort study was to assess whether a high proportion of concurrent acute surgical admissions, tying up hospital surgical capacity, may lead to delayed surgery and affect mortality for hip fracture patients. Methods. This study investigated time to surgery and 60-day post-admission death of patients 70 years and older admitted for acute hip fracture surgery in Norway between 2008 and 2016. The proportion of hospital capacity being occupied by newly admitted surgical patients was used as the exposure. Hip fracture patients admitted during periods of high proportion of recent admissions were compared with hip fracture patients admitted at the same hospital during the same month, on similar weekdays, and times of the day with fewer admissions. Results. Among 60,072 patients, mean age was 84.6 years (SD 6.8), 78% were females, and median time to surgery was 20 hours (IQR 11 to 29). Overall, 14% (8,464) were dead 60 days after admission. A high (75. th. percentile) proportion of recent surgical admission compared to a low (25. th. percentile) proportion resulted in 20% longer time to surgery (95% confidence interval (CI) 16 to 25) and 20% higher 60-day mortality (hazard ratio 1.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.4). Conclusion. A high volume of recently admitted acute surgical patients, indicating probable competition for surgical resources, was associated with delayed surgery and increased 60-day mortality. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):264–270

Aims. The aim of this study was to explore whether time to surgery affects functional outcome in displaced proximal humeral fractures. Methods. A total of 250 patients presenting within three weeks of sustaining a displaced proximal humeral fracture involving the surgical neck were recruited at 32 acute NHS hospitals in the United Kingdom between September 2008 and April 2011. Of the 125 participants, 109 received surgery (fracture fixation or humeral head replacement) as per randomization. Data were included for 101 and 67 participants at six-month and five-year follow-up, respectively. Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS) collected at six, 12, and 24 months and at three, four, and five years following randomization was plotted against time to surgery. Long-term recovery was explored by plotting six-month scores against five-year scores and agreement was illustrated with a Bland-Altman plot. Results. The mean time from initial trauma to surgery was 10.5 days (1 to 33). Earlier surgical intervention did not improve OSS throughout follow-up, nor when stratified by participant age (< 65 years vs ≥ 65 years) and fracture severity (one- and two-part vs three- and four-part fractures). Participants managed later than reported international averages (three days in the United States and Germany, eight days in the United Kingdom) did not have worse outcomes. At five-year follow-up, 50 participants (76%) had the same or improved OSS compared with six months (six-month mean OSS 35.8 (SD 10.0); five-year mean OSS 40.1 (SD 9.1); r = 0.613). A Bland-Altman plot demonstrated a positive mean difference (3.3 OSS points (SD 7.92)) with wide 95% limits of agreement (-12.2 and 18.8 points). Conclusion. Timing of surgery did not affect OSS at any stage of follow-up, irrespective of age or fracture type. Most participants had maximum functional outcome at six months that was maintained at five years. These findings may help guide providers of trauma services on surgical prioritization. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(1):33–41

Aims. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine whether earlier surgical repair of acute rotator cuff tear (ARCT) leads to superior post-operative clinical outcomes. Methods. The MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Libraries, controlled-trials.com and clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched using the terms: ‘rotator cuff’, or ‘supraspinatus’, or ‘infraspinatus’, or ‘teres minor’, or ‘subscapularis’ AND ‘surgery’ or ‘repair’. This gave a total of 15 833 articles. After deletion of duplicates and the review of abstracts and full texts by two independent assessors, 15 studies reporting time to surgery for ARCT repair were included. Studies were grouped based on time to surgery < 3 months (group A, seven studies), or > 3 months (group B, eight studies). Weighted means were calculated and compared using Student’s t-test. . Results. Group B had a significantly higher pre-operative Constant score (CS) (p < 0.001), range of movement in external rotation (p = 0.003) and abduction (p < 0.001) compared with group A. Both groups showed clinical improvement with surgical repair; group A had a significantly improved Constant score, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, abduction and elevation post-operatively (all p < 0.001). Group B had significantly improved Constant score (p < 0.001) and external rotation (p < 0.001) post-operatively. The mean Constant score improved by 33.5 for group A and by 27.5 for group B. Conclusion. These findings should be interpreted with caution due to limitations and bias inherent to case-series. We suggest a trend that earlier time to surgery may be linked to better Constant score, and active range of movement in abduction and elevation. Additional prospective studies are required

Current recommendations advocate for surgery within 48 hours from time of injury as a keystone in care for elderly patients with hip fractures. A spare population density within regional Australia provides physical challenges to meet time critical care parameters. This study aims to review the impact of delays to timely surgery for elderly hip fracture patients within a regional Australian population. A retrospective, comparative analysis was undertaken of 140 consecutive hip fracture patients managed at a single rural referral hospital, from June 2020 until June 2021. Factors such as age, time to transfer, time to surgery, 30-day complication and 6-month complication rates were collected. Statistical analysis was performed where applicable. Mean time to surgery was 33.9 hours. A greater proportion of patients whom directly presented underwent surgery within the recommended 48 hours (91.5% vs 75.3%). The statistically significant delay in time to surgery was found to be 6.4 hours. Lower 180-day morbidity and mortality rates were observed in patients undergoing surgery within 48 hours (13.8% vs 36%), This is in comparison to the overall mortality rate of 19.2%. Delay to surgery for elderly hip fracture patients was associated with an increase 30-day and 180-day morbidity and mortality rate. A greater proportion of patients transferred from peripheral hospitals experienced a delay in surgery. Early transfer and prioritization of such patients is recommended to achieve comparative outcomes for rural and remote Australians

Introduction. The Te Whatu Ora Southern catchment area covers the largest geographical region in New Zealand (over 62,000 km2) creating logistical challenges in providing timely access to emergency neck of femur (NOF) fracture surgery. Current Australian and New Zealand guidelines recommend that NoF surgery be performed within 48 hours of presentation. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes for patients with NoF fractures who present directly to a referral hospital (Southland Hospital) compared to those are transferred from rural peripheral centres. Methods. A retrospective cohort study identified 79 patients with NoF who were transferred from rural peripheral centres to a referral hospital for operative management between January 2011 to December 2020. This cohort was matched 1:1 by age and sex to patients with NoF who presently directly to the referral hospital over the same period. The primary outcome was to compare time to surgery between the groups and secondary outcomes were to compare length of hospital stay, complication rates and mortality rates at 30-days and 1-year. Results. The mean delay in transfer time from peripheral centres was 11.5 ± 6.4 h. The mean time to surgery was higher, but not significantly different (p=0.155), for patients transferred from peripheral centres compared to patients presenting directly to the referral hospital (30.7 ± 16.5 h vs. 26.8 ± 17.2 h, respectively). However, rates of surgery within 48 h were similar between the patients transferred from peripheral centres and patients presenting directly to the referral hospital (8.8% vs 7.6%, p>0.999). There were no significant differences in complication rates, length of stay or 30-day or 1-year mortality between the groups. Discussion and Conclusion. Significant delays in transfer from peripheral centres to the referral hospital were identified, averaging 11.5 h. There was a strong trend towards increased time to surgery for patients transferred from peripheral centres. Early transfer of patients with NoF to a referral hospital should continue to be made a high priority

Introduction. The aim of this study is to report the 30 day COVID-19 related morbidity and mortality of patients assessed as SARS-CoV-2 negative who underwent emergency or urgent orthopaedic surgery in the NHS during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Method. A retrospective, single centre, observational cohort study of all patients undergoing surgery between 17 March 2020 and 3May 2020 was performed. Outcomes were stratified by British Orthopaedic Association COVID-19 Patient Risk Assessment Tool. Patients who were SARS-CoV-2 positive at the time of surgery were excluded. Results. Overall, 96 patients assessed as negative for SARS-CoV-2 at the time of surgery underwent 100 emergency or urgent orthopaedic procedures during the study period. Within 30 days of surgery 9.4% of patients (n = 9) were found to be SARS-CoV-2 positive by nasopharyngeal swab. The overall 30 day mortality rate across the whole cohort of patients during this period was 3% (n = 3). Of those testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 66% (n = 6) developed significant COVID-19 related complications and there was a 33% 30-day mortality rate (n = 3). Overall, the 30-day mortality in patients classified as BOA low or medium risk (n = 69) was 0%, whereas in those classified as high or very high risk (n = 27) it was 11.1%. Conclusion. Orthopaedic surgery in SARS-CoV-2 negative patients who transition to positive within 30 days of surgery carries a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. In lower risk groups, the overall risk of becoming SARS-CoV-2 positive, and subsequently developing a significant postoperative related complication, was low even during the peak of the pandemic. In addition to ensuring patients are SARS-CoV-2 negative at the time of surgery it is important that the risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 is minimized through their recovery. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-8:474–480

Aims

Surgery is often delayed in patients who sustain a hip fracture and are treated with a total hip arthroplasty (THA), in order to await appropriate surgical expertise. There are established links between delay and poorer outcomes in all patients with a hip fracture, but there is little information about the impact of delay in the less frail patients who undergo THA. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of delayed surgery on outcomes in these patients.

Hip fractures are among the most common orthopaedic injuries and represent a growing burden on healthcare as our population ages. Despite improvements in preoperative optimisation, surgical technique and postoperative care, complication rates remain high. Time to surgery is one of the few variables that may be influenced by the medical team. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of time to surgery on mortality and major complications following surgical fixation of hip fractures. Utilising the American College of Surgeons' National Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, we analysed all hip fractures (femoral neck, inter-trochanteric, and sub-trochanteric) treated from 2011 to 2013 inclusively. We divided patients into three groups based on time to surgery: less than one day (<24h), one to two days (24–48h), and two to five days (48–120h). Baseline characteristics were compared between groups and a multivariate analysis performed to compare 30-day mortality and major complications (return to surgery, deep wound infection, pneumonia, pulmonary embolus, acute renal failure, cerebrovascular accident, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, or coma) between groups. A total of 14,730 patients underwent surgical fixation of a hip fracture and were included in our analysis. There were 3,475 (24%) treated <24h, 9,960 (67%) treated 24–48h, and 1,295 (9%) treated 48–120h. Thirty-day mortality and major complication rates were 5.0% and 6.2% for the <24h group, 5.3% and 7.0% for the 24–48h group, 7.9% and 9.7% for the 48–120h group respectively. After controlling for baseline demographic differences between groups (age, sex, race) as well as pertinent comorbidities (diabetes, dyspnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic steroid use, hypertension, cancer, bleeding disorders, and renal failure), time to surgery beyond 48h resulted in greater odds of both mortality (1.45, 95%CI 1.10–1.91) and major complications (1.45, 95%CI 1.12–1.84). Time to surgery is one of the few variables that can be influenced by timely medical assessment and access to the operation room. Expediting surgery within 48h of hip fracture is of paramount importance as it may significantly reduce the risk of mortality as well as major complications

Aim: To ascertain whether there is a relationship between time to surgery and mortality in hip fracture patients. Method: The records of 120 patients admitted with hip fractures were examined. The approximate time of injury, the time of admission to hospital, the time of surgery, the number of medical co-morbidities, the A.S.A. grade, age, and length of hospital stay, were recorded. Death statistics were obtained from the Registrar of Births Deaths and Marriages. An analysis was then performed to assess the presence of correlation between time from injury to surgery, time from admission to surgery and three and six-month mortality in patients who were A.S.A. grades two or three. Results: Preliminary analysis of the data showed a strong correlation between time from injury and the time from admission, to surgery and subsequent death. When these times exceeded 24 hours the mortality increased. Conclusion: This study suggested that every effort should be made to operate on patients with hip fractures within 24 hours of admission to minimise mortality resulting from this injury

A prospective audit was carried out to analyse the relationship between time to surgery, number of co-morbidities and length of stay in 357 consecutive patients operated on for a fractured neck of femur. One hundred and thirty five patients were operated on within 48 hours (group 1), 129 between 48 and 96 hours (group 2) and 93 patients after 96 hours (group 3). The mean (std dev) age was 77.2 (12.5) years in group 1, 79.8 (9.9) years in group 2 and 79.2 (9.4) in group 3. There were 93 (69%) females in group 1, 99 (77%) in group 2 and 67 (72%) in group 3. The number (%) admitted from home was 85 (63) in group 1, 81 (63) in group 2 and 73 (79) in group 3. In the 30 patients with no co-morbidities there was a strong relationship between wait for surgery and length of stay. In these patients the median length of stay increased from 8.5 days in group 1 to 21 days when in group 3. In the 187 patients with one or two co-morbidities the relationship was present but weaker. The median length of stay increased from 16 days in group 1 to 21 days when in group 3. In the 140 patients with 3 or more co-morbidities there was no relationship between wait for surgery and length of stay. Median length of stay was 23 days in group 1 and 21 days in group 3. This data from a large consecutive group of patients suggests that the fit patient with a hip fracture benefits from early surgery with a shorter length of stay. Those with multiple co-morbidities have their length of stay determined by their medical condition

Aims. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of time to surgical intervention from admission on mortality and morbidity for patients with hip fractures. Methods. MEDLINE and Embase were searched from inception to June 2020. Reference lists were manually assessed to identify additional papers. Primary comparative research studies that recruited patients aged over 60 years, with non-pathological primary proximal femoral fractures that were treated surgically, were included. Studies that did not include a group operated on within 24 hours or which reported time to surgery in calendar days were excluded. Two investigators extracted data on study characteristics, methods, and outcomes. The pre-defined primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were complications and mortality at other time points. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were aggregated and were grouped by study-level characteristics. Results. This review included 46 studies (January 1991 to June 2020), comprising 521,857 hip fractures with 64,047 postoperative deaths. No randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion. In a pooled analysis of 15 studies, RR of mortality at 30 days comparing time to surgery < 24 hours with > 24 hours was 0.86 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.91; I. 2. = 69%; 95% CI 50% to 81%; p-value for heterogeneity < 0.001). The association was stronger in observational studies that did not adjust for confounders than in those that adjusted for multiple covariates. In a pooled analysis of six studies, the RR of mortality at 30 days comparing time to surgery < 24 hours with 24 to 36 hours was 0.87 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.93; I. 2. = 65%; 95% CI 16% to 85%; p-value for heterogeneity = 0.014). Conclusion. This meta-analysis indicates reduced mortality for patients operated within 24 hours compared with those operated on beyond 24 hours or within 24 to 36 hours. Where resources allow and there is no specific reversible contraindication to early surgery, we recommend that hip fractures should be surgically treated within 24 hours. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7):1176–1186

Objective: To evaluate the effects of a new potent bisphosphonate on the formation, mineralisation, density, and mechanical properties of bone in distraction osteogenesis. Methods: Thirty immature New Zealand White rabbits had a 10.5 millimetre lengthening of their tibia performed over 2 weeks using an Orthofix M-100 fixator. Ten control rabbits received saline only; 10 received the new bisphosphonate at the time of surgery, and 10 received a second dose at the end of distraction. Bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD) measurements were made at two, four and six weeks. Quantitative CT analysis of regenerate, proximal and distal bone, and corresponding segments in the non-operated limb was performed after culling. Mechanical testing was by 4-point bending. Results: Bone mineral accrual was significantly faster in both treatment groups (ANOVA p< 0.01). BMD increased in all treated animals (ANOVA p< 0.01). Cross sectional area of regenerate at six weeks was increased by 49% in the single dosed group versus controls and by 59% in the re-dosed group. (ANOVA p< 0.01). BMC of the regenerate was increased by 92% in the single dose group and by 111% in the re-dosed group (ANOVA p< 0.01). Moment of inertia of the regenerate was significantly increased in both treated groups (ANOVA p< 0.05). The difference between single dose and controls was significant (p< 0.05), the difference between re-dosed and single dosed was not (p=0.5). Conclusion: Bisphosphonate therapy significantly increased new bone formation, bone mineralisation and mechanical properties. Osteoporotic effects were reversed. This effect could have wide ranging implications for many orthopaedic practices

Introduction:. There is an increasing trend within the US for utilization of total knee replacement for patients who are still of working-age. Numerous causes have been suggested, ranging from greater participation in demanding sporting activities to the epidemic of obesity. A universal concern is that increased arthritis burden will lead to increased disabilty and unsustainable health-care costs both now and in the future with increasing rates of revision surgery in the years ahead. This raises the critical question: Are younger patients receiving knee replacement prematurely? To address this issue, we compared the severity of operative knee pain and functional status in younger versus older TKR patients, drawing upon a national research registry. Methods:. A cohort of 3314 primary TKR patients was identified from the FORCE national research consortium from all surgeries performed between July 1. st. 2011 and March 30. th. 2012. This set of patients was derived from 120 contributing surgeons in 23 US states. Data characterizing each patient undergoing surgery was derived from patients, surgeons and hospitals, and included the SF 36 Physical Component Score (PCS), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. WOMAC scores were also calculated from the KOOS data and transformed to a 0-to-100 scale with lower scores representing worse impairment. Using descriptive statistics, we compared the demographic and baseline characteristics of patients younger than 65 years of age (n = 1326) vs. those 65 years of age and older (n = 1988). Results:. 40.0% of the study poulation was younger than 65 years of age. These younger patients were less likely to be white (86.4% vs. 92.7%, p < 0.0001), had a greater body mass index (mean BMI 33.0 vs. 30.5, p < 0.0001), and included a larger percentage of smokers (9.4% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.0001). There was a striking prevalence of musculo-skeletal co-morbidities in both groups, with half of the total cohort (50.7%) reporting impairment of at least one joint in addition to the operated knee. Involvement of additional joints was more common in older patients (56.0%) compared to the younger group (42.9%; p = 0.0001). Younger patients reported greater pain (47.3 vs. 53.9, p < 0.0001) and stiffness (38.1 vs. 46.6, p < 0.0001) in the operative knee joint and poorer overall function as measured by the WOMAC and SF36 PCS (WOMAC 50.2 vs. 53.0, p < 0.0001; PCS 32.1 vs. 33.0, p = 0.001). Function levels in both groups reflect significant impairment at time of surgery. Conclusion:. At the time of TKR, younger patients have fewer medical illnesses, but higher rates of obesity and smoking as well as lower mental health scores. In addition, younger patients have the same or greater functional impairment compared to older patients. This supports the view that there should be earlier and more definitive treatment in younger TKR patients to prevent progression of joint disease. Our data suggest that TKR may benefit at an even earlier stage than at present in patients younger than 65 years of age. While it is likely this would improve short term outcomes, the longer term consequences may outweigh the benefits

The aim of this study was to determine the medium term survivorship and function of the cemented Exeter Universal Hip Replacement when used in younger patients. Since 1988 The Exeter Hip Research Unit has prospectively gathered data on all patients who have had total hip replacements at the Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Hospital. There were 88 Exeter Universal total hip replacements (THR) in 71 patients who were 50 years or younger at the time of surgery and whose surgery was performed at least 10 years before. 25 surgeons performed the surgery. Mean age at surgery was 43 years (range 24 to 50 years. ) 5 patients who had 7 THRs had died leaving 81 THRs for review. Patients were reviewed in clinic at an average of 11. 4 years (10 – 13 years). No patient was lost to follow up. At review, 8 hips had been revised. 5 cases were for loose cemented metal backed acetabular prosthesis. Two femoral components were revised for infection and one for aseptic loosening. Radiographs showed that a further 10 (13%) acetabular prosthesis were loose and that 3 femurs showed significant osteolysis. Overall 10-year survivorship of stem and cup from all causes was 93%. The 10-year survivorship of stem only from all causes was 98% and from aseptic loosening was 99%. The Exeter Universal Stem performs extremely well in the younger patient. However the high failure rate of the cemented metal backed Exeter acetabular component has compromised the overall results in this series

Purpose: To clinically evaluate the medium term outcome of a patient cohort age 55 years or older at the time of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO). Methods: Between January 1997 and January 2003, 60 patients (52 males) underwent 66 MOWHTOs. Following a systematic chart review 56 returned for follow up. Outcomes measures were KOOS, LEFS, SF-12, Cincinnati, Tegner scores, a new activity score and physical examination. Routine knee and long leg standing radiographs were compared to pre and early postoperative radiographs. Results: Thirteen patients were not assessed further, 6 (7 MOWHTOs) had undergone total knee arthroplasty (TKA), 3 had passed away and 4 were lost to follow up. Thus the probability of survival (not converting MOWHTO to TKA) was 0.966 at 3 years, 0.927 at 4 years and 0.878 at 5 years. Quality of life, functional status and general health of the remaining 47 patients (52 HTOs) with a mean age of 62 years (55–75) at the time of surgery were assessed. At a mean follow up of 62 months (26–98), on the author’s activity score, 83% performed at least one high impact activity at moderate to high intensity an average of 4–7 times per week and 6% did not participate in any sport. Average participation in activities/sports was 3 per person at a participation level of 4.6 (Tegner). The mean Cincinnati score was 75% (SD=23, 14–95%). Mean scores for the KOOS and LEFS were 66% (SD=22, 7–99%) and 49 (SD=18, 5–80) respectively. Seventy–two percent were fully weight bearing by 3 months. There were 6 revisions for a combination of delayed and non-unions. Conclusions: MOWHTO remains a viable alternative for patients over the age of 55 with knee osteoarthritis and varus malalignment who would otherwise be candidates for arthroplasty and particularly for those wishing to maintain or regain a high level of activity

This trial aims to assess the effectiveness of quality improvement collaboratives as a technique to introduce large-scale change and improve outcomes for patients undergoing primary elective total hip or total knee arthroplasty.

41 NHS Trusts that did not have; a preoperative anaemia screening and optimisation pathways, or a methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus Aureus (MSSA) decolonisation pathway, in place were randomised to one of two parallel collaboratives in a two arm, cluster randomised controlled trial. Each collaborative focussed on implementing one of these two preoperative pathways. Collaboratives took place from May 2018 to November 2019. 27 Trusts completed the trial. Outcome data were collected for procedures between November 2018 and November 2019.

Co-primary outcomes were perioperative blood transfusion (within 7 days of surgery) and deep surgical site infections (SSI) caused by MSSA (within 90 days) for the anaemia and MSSA arms respectively. Secondary outcomes include deep and superficial SSIs (any organism), length of stay, critical care admissions, and readmissions. Process measures include the proportion of patients receiving each preoperative initiative.

19,254 procedures from 27 Trusts are included. Process measures show both preoperative pathways were implemented to a high degree (75.3% compliance in MSSA arm; 61.2% anaemia arm), indicating that QICs can facilitate change in the NHS. However, there were no improvements in blood transfusions (2.9% v 2.3% adjusted-OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.52–2.75, p=0.67), MSSA deep SSIs (0.13% v 0.14% adjusted-OR 1.01, 95%CI 0.42–2.46, p=0.98), or any secondary outcome.

Whilst no significant improvement in patient outcomes were seen, this trial shows quality improvement collaboratives can successfully support the implementation of new preoperative pathways in planned surgery in the NHS.

We have studied whether the state of the articular cartilage at the time of rotational acetabular osteotomy for dysplasia of the hip affects the outcome 2 to 5.5 years after surgery. Arthroscopy in 57 patients (59 joints) at the time of the operation showed grade-0 changes in seven, grade-1 in nine, grade-2 in 17, grade-3 in 14 and grade-4 in 12 joints, according to the classification of Outerbridge. There was radiological evidence of the progression of arthritis in four joints which were classified at arthroscopy as grade 4.

Stepwise regression analysis showed that damage to acetabular or femoral articular cartilage significantly affected the progression of arthritis. We conclude that the short-term results of successful rotational acetabular osteotomy for dysplasia are affected by the state of the articular cartilage.

Hip fracture is a common injury with a high associated mortality. Many recommendations regarding timing of operative intervention exist for patients with such injuries. The Best Practice Tariff was introduced in England and Wales in 2010, offering financial incentives for surgery undertaken within 36 hours of admission. The England and Wales National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Guidance states that surgery should be performed on the day or day after admission. Due to lack of clear evidence, this recommendation is based on Humanitarian grounds. NICE have called for further research into the effect of surgical timing on mortality.

We utilised data from the National Hip Fracture database prospectively collected between 2007 and 2015, comprising 413,063 hip fractures. Using 11 variables, both Cox and Logistic regression analysis was used to establish the effect on mortality of each 12 hour interval from admission to surgery.

For each 12 hour time frame from admission to surgery a trend for improved 30 day survival was demonstrated the earlier the surgery was performed. However, this did not reach significance until beyond 48 hours (Hazard ratio of 1.12, 95% CI: 1.04–1.20). Surgery after 48 hours suffered significantly higher chance of mortality compared to surgery done within 12 hours.

This is the largest analysis undertaken to date. Lowest mortality rates are found within the 0–12 hour window. After 48 hours there is a significant increased risk of mortality compared to the 0–12 hour time frame. As such, expeditious surgery within 48 hours can be justified both on humanitarian and survivorship grounds.

Hip fracture surgery performed within 48 hours is associated with reduced mortality when compared to that beyond this time. This is in agreement with Blue Book recommendations and extends the currently recommended NICE and Best Practice Tariff targets of 36 hours.

Implantation of allograft bone continues to be an integral part of revision hip surgery. One major concern with its use is the risk of transmission of infective agents. There are a number of methods of processing bone in order to reduce that risk. One part of that processing can be carried out immediately prior to implantation using pulsed irrigation.

We report the incidence of deep bacterial infection in a series of 138 patients undergoing 144 revision hip arthroplasty procedures who had undergone allograft bone implantation. The allograft bone used was fresh-frozen non-irradiated. Allograft femoral heads were milled following removal of any residual soft tissue and sclerotic subchondral bone. The bone chips were then placed in a standard metal sieve and irrigated with Normal Saline (pre-warmed to 60 degrees Centigrade) delivered as pulsed lavage at 7 bar pressure. No antibiotics were used in the irrigation solution. The bone chips were washed until all visible blood and marrow products had been removed.

The deep infection rate at a minimum one year follow-up was 0.6%. This method of secondary processing appears to be consistent with a very low risk of allograft related bacterial infection.