Aim. Repeat revision surgery of total hip or knee replacement may lead to massive bone loss of the femur. If these defects exceed a critical amount a stable fixation of a proximal or distal femur replacement may not be possible. In these extraordinary cases a total femur replacement (TFR) may be used as an option for limb salvage. In this retrospective study we examined complications, revision free survival (RFS), amputation free survival (AFS) and risk factors for decreased RFS and AFS following a TRF in cases of revision arthroplasty with a special focus on periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Method. We included all implantations of a TFR in revision surgery from 2006–2018. Patients with a primary implantation of a TFR for oncological indications were not included. Complications were classified using the Henderson Classification. Primary endpoints were revision of the TFR or disarticulation of the hip. The minimum follow up was 24 month. RFS and AFS were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method, patients´ medical history was analyzed for possible risk factors for decreased RFS and AFS. Results. After applying the inclusion criteria 58 cases of a TFR in revision surgery were included with a median follow-up of 48.5 month. The median age at surgery was 68 years and the median amount of prior surgeries was 3. A soft tissue failure (Henderson Type I) appeared in 16 cases (28%) of which 13 (22%) needed revision surgery. A PJI of the TFR (Henderson Type IV) appeared in 32 cases (55%) resulting in 18 (31%) removals of the TFR and implantation of a total femur spacer. Disarticulation of the hip following a therapy resistant PJI was performed in 17 cases (29%). The overall 2-year RFS was 36% (95% confidence interval(CI) 24–48%). Patients with a Body mass Index (BMI) >30kg/m² had a decreased RFS after 24 month (>30kg/m² 11% (95%CI 0–25%) vs. <30kg/m² 50% (95%CI 34–66%)p<0.01). The overall AFS after 5 years was 68% (95%CI 54–83%). A PJI of the TFR and a BMI >30kg/m² was significantly correlated with a lower 5-year AFS (PJI 46% (95%CI 27–66%) vs no PJI 100%p<0.001) (BMI >30kg/m² 30% (95% KI 3–57%) vs. <30km/m² 85% (95% KI 73–98%)p<0.01). Conclusions. A TFR in revision arthroplasty is a valuable option for limb salvage but complications in need of further revision surgery are common. Patients with a BMI >30kg/m² should be informed regarding the increased risk for revision surgery and loss of extremity before operation

Limb salvage in musculoskeletal tumor surgery may be complicated by infection. With the advent of modern techniques and medical management limb sparing surgeries can be considered as an alternative to ablation. Between 1992 and 2014, 17 patients were treated for infected megaprostheses after being surgically treated for musculoskeletal tumors. There were nine females and eight males. The mean time from the index procedure until infection was 30 months. Following radical debridement, the resultant skeletal defect averaged 30 cm. Patients were treated with local antibiotics in polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) spacers and endoprostheses as well as IV antibiotics for a minimum of six weeks followed by oral antibiotics for an additional six weeks. The initial tumor procedure involved the femur in eleven patients, the tibia in two, the acetabulum in one, the humerus in two, and the ulna in one. Patients had repeat cultures before two-stage reimplantation when their WBC, ESR, and CRP returned to normal. Patients were reimplanted when final cultures were negative. Thirteen patients were treated using a two-stage protocol with customized intraoperative antibiotic impregnated PMMA spacers including intramedullary nails for a mean of 10 months and the other four patients had a one-stage procedure. These four patients included two patients with a total femur replacement and two patients with an allograft-prosthetic composite of the proximal humerus and ulna. The organisms cultured were gram positive in 14 cases, mixed gram positive and negative in one case, and two patients had no growth on cultures but histologic evidence of acute infection. Reimplantation was successful in 13 patients after the initial procedure (76%). Four patients had recurrent infections. One of these patients was successfully reimplanted after a one-stage procedure, two had a second two-stage procedure and have retained their spacers, and one had an amputation. Successful limb salvage in regards to infection control occurred in 14/17 patients (82%). One additional patient required an amputation for an oncologic complication (local recurrence), so the overall limb salvage rate was 13/17 (76%). Patients with megaprosthetic infections following limb salvage treatment for musculoskeletal tumors do not have to be uniformly subject to amputation. Radical debridement and appropriate antibiotics in conjunction with custom spacers followed by selective one- and two-stage reimplantation results in successful limb salvage in 82% of patients. This result is similar to other reports despite the large size average defects

Massive proximal femoral bone loss can be a complex problem, despite various modern technical and implant solutions. Due to inadequate bone stock and missing proximal fixation possibilities, including larger segmental osseous defects, the use of a mega prosthesis might become necessary. Coverage of the segmental bone loss in combination with distal fixation, can be achieved in either cemented or non-cemented techniques. Some implant types allow for additional fixation of the gluteal muscles, attached with non-absorbable sutures or synthetic mesh grafts. Although first reports about partial or even complete femoral replacement are available since the 1960's, larger case series or technical reports are rare within the literature and limited to some specialised centers. Most series are reported by oncologic centers, with necessary larger osseous resections of the femur. The final implantation of any mega prosthesis system requires meticulous planning, especially to calculate the appropriate leg length of the implant and resulting leg length. Combination of a posterior hip with a lateral knee approach allows for the enlargement to a total femur replacement, if necessary. The lateral vastus muscle is detached and the entire soft tissues envelope can be displaced medially. After implant and cement removal, non-structural bone might be resected. Trial insertion is important, due to the variation of overall muscle tension intraoperatively and prevention of early or late dislocation. Currently the use of proximal modular systems, including length, offset and anteversion adaption, became the technique of choice for these implant systems. However, just very few companies offer yet such a complete system, which might also be expanded to a total femur solution. We were able to evaluate our Endo-Klinik results of total-femur replacements within 100 consecutive patients in non-infected cases, after a mean follow up time of five years. There we “only” 68% patients without complications, main complications included: 13% revealed a deep infection; dislocation was found in 6%, material failure and consequent breakage in 3%, persistent patellar problems in 2% and finally 1% with peroneal nerve palsy. These results show that a total-femur replacement is associated with a high complication rate, even in non-infected patient cohorts