Waiting times for arthroplasty surgery in Northern Ireland are among the longest in the National Health Service, which have been further lengthened by the onset of the SARS-CoV-19 global pandemic in March 2020. The Department of Health (DoH) in Northern Ireland has announced a new Elective Care Framework (ECF), with the framework proposing that by March 2026 no patient will wait more than 52 weeks for inpatient/day case treatment. We aimed to assess the feasibility of achieving this with reference to
Radiological Inclination (RI) is defined as the angle formed between the acetabular axis and the longitudinal axis when projected onto the coronal plane. Higher RI angles are associated with adverse outcomes. Primary aim: to investigate the effect of adjusting patient pelvic position in the transverse plane by using a ‘head-down’ (HD) operating table position. This was to determine, when aiming for 35° Apparent Operative Inclination (AOI), which operating table position most accurately achieved a target post-operative RI of 42°. N=270. Patients were randomised to one of three possible operating table positions: 0°HD (Horizontal), 7°HD, or Y°HD (Patient Specific Table Position) Operating table position was controlled using a digital inclinometer. RI was measured using EBRA software.Introduction
Methods
The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term results
of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients using
either a conventional (CPE) or a highly cross-linked (HXLPE) polyethylene
liner in terms of functional outcome, incidence of osteolysis, radiological
wear and rate of revision. We included all patients between the ages of 45 and 65 years
who, between January 2000 and December 2001, had undergone a primary
THA for osteoarthritis at our hospital using a CPE or HXLPE acetabular
liner and a 28 mm cobalt-chrome femoral head. From a total of 160 patients, 158 (177 hips) were available for
review (CPE 89; XLPE 88). The mean age, body mass index (BMI) and
follow-up in each group were: CPE: 56.8 years (46 to 65); 30.7 kg/m2 (19
to 58); 13.2 years (2.1 to 14.7) and HXLPE: 55.6 years (45 to 65);
BMI: 30 kg/m2 (18 to 51); 13.1 years (5.7 to 14.4).Aims
Methods
Aims. This study was designed to develop a model for predicting bone mineral density (BMD) loss of the femur after
Aims. Osteoporosis is common in
Aims. Achieving accurate implant positioning and restoring native hip biomechanics are key surgeon-controlled technical objectives in
Aims. Pelvic discontinuity is a rare but increasingly common complication of
Aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of a patient-specific algorithm which we developed for predicting changes in sagittal pelvic tilt after
Aims.
Aims. Better prediction of outcome after
Aims. Successful cell therapy in hip osteonecrosis (ON) may help to avoid ON progression or
Aims. Young adults undergoing
Aims. Manual impaction, with a mallet and introducer, remains the standard method of installing cementless acetabular cups during
Aims. The primary objective of this study was to develop a validated classification system for assessing iatrogenic bone trauma and soft-tissue injury during
Aims. The aim of this study was to compare the pattern of initial fixation and changes in periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) between patients who underwent
Aims. This study aimed to assess the carbon footprint associated with
Aims. A revision for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in
Aims. Iliopsoas impingement occurs in 4% to 30% of patients after undergoing
Aims. Spinopelvic pathology increases the risk for instability following
Aims. Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a common pre- and postoperative issue in