Introduction. Patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) or unstable spinal lesions warrant early surgical consultation. In multiple myeloma, chemotherapy and radiotherapy have the potential to decompress the spinal canal effectively in the presence of epidural lesions. Mechanical stability conferred by bracing may potentiate intraosseous and extraosseous bone formation, thus increasing spinal stability. This study aims to review the role of non-operative management in myeloma patients with a high degree of spinal instability, in a specialist tertiary centre. Methods. Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of 83 patients with unstable myelomatous lesions of the spine, defined by a Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) of 13–18. Data collected include patient demographics, systemic treatment, neurological status, radiological presence of cord compression, most unstable vertebral level and presence of intraosseous and extraosseous bone formation. Post-treatment scores were calculated based on follow-up imaging which was carried out at 2 weeks for cord compression and 12 weeks for spinal instability. A paired t-test was used to identify any significant difference between pre- and post-treatment SINS and linear regression was used to assess the association between variables and the change in SINS. Results. A significant reduction in SINS was observed from a pre-treatment average score of 14 to a score of 9, following treatment for myeloma (p<0.001). A higher initial score and a younger age were associated with a larger overall reduction in SINS (p<0.001 and p=0.02 respectively). No single variable (bisphosphates, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and steroids) had a significant association with SINS reduction. 25 (30%) patients had spinal cord compression, all of which showed radiological resolution of cord compression at 2 weeks. No patients developed neurological deterioration during treatment and all patients had an improvement in their pain scores. 64 (77%) patients had evidence of intraosseous and/or extraosseous bone formation on their follow-up scan. Conclusion. Non-operative management in the form of bracing and systemic therapy is a safe and effective treatment for spinal instability and spinal cord compression in myeloma. Treatment of unstable myelomatous lesions of the spine with or without cord compression should not follow traditional guidelines for MSCC. The decision to adopt a non-operative approach in this cohort of patients should ideally be made in a tertiary centre with expertise in multiple myeloma and in a multidisciplinary setting

Aims. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of using MRI scans to calculate the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). Methods. A total of 100 patients were retrospectively included in the study. The SINS score was calculated from each patient’s MRI and CT scans by two consultant musculoskeletal radiologists (reviewers 1 and 2) and one consultant spinal surgeon (reviewer 3). In order to avoid potential bias in the assessment, MRI scans were reviewed first. Bland-Altman analysis was used to identify the limits of agreement between the SINS scores from the MRI and CT scans for the three reviewers. Results. The limit of agreement between the SINS score from the MRI and CT scans for the reviewers was -0.11 for reviewer 1 (95% CI 0.82 to -1.04), -0.12 for reviewer 2 (95% CI 1.24 to -1.48), and -0.37 for reviewer 3 (95% CI 2.35 to -3.09). The use of MRI tended to increase the score when compared with that using the CT scan. No patient having their score calculated from MRI scans would have been classified as stable rather than intermediate or unstable when calculated from CT scans, potentially leading to suboptimal care. Conclusion. We found that MRI scans can be used to calculate the SINS score reliably, compared with the score from CT scans. The main difference between the scores derived from MRI and CT was in defining the type of bony lesion. This could be made easier by knowing the site of the primary tumour when calculating the score, or by using inverted T1-volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination MRI to assess the bone more reliably, similar to using CT. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(5):971–975

Aims. The timing of surgical fixation in spinal fractures is a contentious topic. Existing literature suggests that early stabilization leads to reduced morbidity, improved neurological outcomes, and shorter hospital stay. However, the quality of evidence is low and equivocal with regard to the safety of early fixation in the severely injured patient. This paper compares complication profiles between spinal fractures treated with early fixation and those treated with late fixation. Methods. All patients transferred to a national tertiary spinal referral centre for primary surgical fixation of unstable spinal injuries without preoperative neurological deficit between 1 July 2016 and 20 October 2017 were eligible for inclusion. Data were collected retrospectively. Patients were divided into early and late cohorts based on timing from initial trauma to first spinal operation. Early fixation was defined as within 72 hours, and late fixation beyond 72 hours. Results. In total, 86 patients underwent spinal surgery in this period. Age ranged from 16 to 88 years. Mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was higher in the early stabilization cohort (p = 0.020). Age was the sole significant independent variable in predicting morbidity on multiple regression analysis (p < 0.003). There was no significant difference in complication rates based on timing of surgical stabilization (p = 0.398) or ISS (p = 0.482). Conclusion. Our results suggest that these patients are suitable for early appropriate care with spinal precautions and delayed definitive surgical stabilization. Earlier surgery conferred no morbidity benefit and had no impact on length of stay. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(5):627–631

The aim of this study was first, to determine whether CT scans undertaken to identify serious injury to the viscera were of use in detecting clinically unrecognised fractures of the thoracolumbar vertebrae, and second, to identify patients at risk of ‘missed injury’. . We retrospectively analysed CT scans of the chest and abdomen performed for blunt injury to the torso in 303 patients. These proved to be positive for thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries in only 2% and 1.3% of cases, respectively. However, 51 (16.8%) showed a fracture of the thoracolumbar vertebrae and these constituted our subset for study. There were eight women and 43 men with mean age of 45.2 years (15 to 94). There were 29 (57%) stable and 22 (43%) unstable fractures. Only 17 fractures (33.3%) had been anticipated after clinical examination. Of the 22 unstable fractures, 11 (50%) were anticipated. Thus, within the whole group of 303 patients, an unstable spinal injury was missed in 11 patients (3.6%); no harm resulted as they were all protected until the spine had been cleared. A subset analysis revealed that patients with a high Injury Severity Score, a low Glasgow Coma Scale and haemodynamic instability were most likely to have a significant fracture in the absence of positive clinical findings. This is the group at greatest risk. Clinical examination alone cannot detect significant fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. It should be combined with CT imaging to reduce the risk of missed injury

Aims

Symptomatic spinal stenosis is a very common problem, and decompression surgery has been shown to be superior to nonoperative treatment in selected patient groups. However, performing an instrumented fusion in addition to decompression may avoid revision and improve outcomes. The aim of the SpInOuT feasibility study was to establish whether a definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) that accounted for the spectrum of pathology contributing to spinal stenosis, including pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch and mobile spondylolisthesis, could be conducted.

Introduction. Low back pain is the leading cause of musculoskeletal disease and the biggest cause of morbidity worldwide. Approximately 40% of these are cases are caused by disease of the intervertebral discs (IVDs): the shock absorbing, flexible material located between the bones (vertebrae) along the length of the spine. In severe cases, the spine becomes unstable and it becomes necessary to immobilise or fix the joint in position using a lumbar cage spacer between in the IVD and metal pins with supporting plates in the vertebrae. This is a complex, expensive, major surgery and it is associated with complications, such as spinal fusion failure and inappropriate implant position. These complications have a dramatic impact on the quality of life of the affected patients and the burden to society and the healthcare system is exacerbated. Methods and Results. We present an in vitro study looking at the effect of our Bgel hydrogel on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and their bone forming capacity within lumbar cages: devices used to space the bones apart in the fusion operation, as a mechanism to improve fixation and intra cage bone formation. MSCs were isolated from human hip joint, expanded, seeded within Bgel, cast into well inserts or lumbar cages and cultured for 4 weeks. Using 3D X-ray imaging micro computed tomography (μCT) scans we show that the MSC in the presence Bgel begin to mineralise within the lumbar cages. Histology is currently ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion. This study shows the potential to improve current spinal fusion practices with the potential to reduce complications. Conflicts of interest: CS and CLM are named inventors on the patent for NPgel/BGel. Funded by the Medical Research Council and Versus Arthritis UK: SNiPER

We assessed the frequency and causes of neurological deterioration in 59 patients with spinal cord injury on whom reports were prepared for clinical negligence litigation. In those who deteriorated neurologically we assessed the causes of the change in neurology and whether that neurological deterioration was potentially preventable. In all 27 patients (46%) changed neurologically, 20 patients (74% of those who deteriorated) had no primary neurological deficit. Of those who deteriorated, 13 (48%) became Frankel A. Neurological deterioration occurred in 23 of 38 patients (61%) with unstable fractures and/or dislocations; all 23 patients probably deteriorated either because of failures to immobilise the spine or because of inappropriate removal of spinal immobilisation. Of the 27 patients who altered neurologically, neurological deterioration was, probably, avoidable in 25 (excess movement in 23 patients with unstable injuries, failure to evacuate an epidural haematoma in one patient and over-distraction following manipulation of the cervical spine in one patient). If existing guidelines and standards for the management of actual or potential spinal cord injury had been followed, neurological deterioration would have been prevented in 25 of the 27 patients (93%) who experienced a deterioration in their neurological status. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:527–31

This study examined spinal fractures in patients admitted to a Major Trauma Centre via two independent pathways, a major trauma (MT) pathway and a standard unscheduled non-major trauma (NMT) pathway. A total of 134 patients were admitted with a spinal fracture over a period of two years; 50% of patients were MT and the remainder NMT. MT patients were predominantly male, had a mean age of 48.8 years (13 to 95), commonly underwent surgery (62.7%), characteristically had fractures in the cervico-thoracic and thoracic regions and 50% had fractures of more than one vertebrae, which were radiologically unstable in 70%. By contrast, NMT patients showed an equal gender distribution, were older (mean 58.1 years; 12 to 94), required fewer operations (56.7%), characteristically had fractures in the lumbar region and had fewer multiple and unstable fractures. This level of complexity was reflected in the length of stay in hospital; MT patients receiving surgery were in hospital for a mean of three to four days longer than NMT patients. These results show that MT patients differ from their NMT counterparts and have an increasing complexity of spinal injury. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:235–9

Aim of Study. To highlight the absence of an important pitfall in the Advanced Trauma Life Support protocol in application of rigid collar to patients with potentially unstable cervical spine injury. Study Method. We present a case series of two patients with ankylosed cervical spines who developed neurological complications following application of rigid collar for cervical spine injuries as per the ATLS protocol. This has been followed up with a survey of A&E and T&O doctors who regularly apply cervical collars for suspected unstable cervical spine injuries. The survey was conducted telephonically using a standard questionnaire. 75 doctors completed the questionnaire. A&E doctors = 42, T&O = 33. Junior grade = 38, middle grade = 37. Trauma management frontline experience >1yr = 50, <1yr = 25. Of the 75 respondents 68/75 (90.6%) would follow the ATLS protocol in applying rigid collar in potentially unstable cervical spine injuries. 58/75 (77.3%) would clinically assess the patient prior to applying collar. Only 43/75 (57.3%) thought the patients relevant past medical history would influence collar application. Respondents were asked whether they were aware of any pitfalls to rigid collar application in suspected neck injuries. 34/75 (45.3%) stated that they were NOT aware of pitfalls. The lack of awareness was even higher 17/25 (68%) amongst doctors with less that 12 months frontline experience. When directly asked whether ankylosing spondylitis should be regarded as a pitfall then only 43/75 (57.3%) answered in the affirmative. Conclusion. We would like to emphasise the disastrous consequences of applying a rigid collar in patients with ankylosed cervical spine. The survey demonstrates the lack of awareness (∼50%) amongst A&E and T&O doctors regarding pitfalls to collar application. We recommend the ATLS manual highlight a pitfall for application of rigid collars in patients with ankylosed spines and suspected cervical spine injuries

Background. Thoracolumbar fractures are the most common spinal injuries resulting from blunt trauma. Missed spinal injuries can have serious consequences. Objective. Our objectives were to determine the utility of trauma series chest and abdomen computed tomographs for detecting clinically unrecognised vertebral fractures and to analyse those missed on clinical examination. The aim was to identify an ‘at-risk’ patient group with negative clinical examination warranting evaluation with CT screening. Material and Methods. We evaluated all computed tomography of the chest and/or abdominal that was undertaken for blunt trauma at our trauma centre from April 2009 to April 2010. Data was gathered from both CT scans and medical notes to capture demographics, mechanism of injury, fracture site and configuration. Key points were the clinical suspicion of vertebral fractures prior to CT request and identifying ‘at-risk’ patient group with factors contributing to difficulty in clinical interpretation. Results. There were a total of 303 patients in the year who underwent CT scan for blunt trauma. 51(16.8%) had a thoracolumbar vertebral fracture. There were 8 women and 43 men a mean age of 45.2 years. There were 29 (56.8%) stable and 22 (43.2%) unstable fractures. Out of the 51 total fracture patients, only 17(33.3%) had been clinically anticipated with a positive clinical examination. In the 22 unstable fractures, only 11 (50%) were expected and had clinically recorded correlating positive examination findings. Conclusion. A combination of both clinical examination and CT screening based on mechanism will likely be required to ensure adequate sensitivity with an acceptable specificity for the diagnosis of clinically significant injuries of the TL spine

We examined the reliability of radiological findings in predicting segmental instability in 112 patients (56 men, 56 women) with a mean age of 66.5 years (27 to 84) who had degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. They underwent intra-operative biomechanical evaluation using a new measurement system. Biomechanical instability was defined as a segment with a neutral zone > 2 mm/N. Risk factor analysis to predict instability was performed on radiographs (range of segmental movement, disc height), MRI (Thompson grade, Modic type), and on the axial CT appearance of the facet (type, opening, vacuum and the presence of osteophytes, subchondral erosion, cysts and sclerosis) using multivariate logistic regression analysis with a forward stepwise procedure. The facet type was classified as sagittally orientated, coronally orientated, anisotropic or wrapped. Stepwise multivariate regression analysis revealed that facet opening was the strongest predictor for instability (odds ratio 5.022, p = 0.009) followed by spondylolisthesis, MRI grade and subchondral sclerosis. Forward stepwise multivariate logistic regression indicated that spondylolisthesis, MRI grade, facet opening and subchondral sclerosis of the facet were risk factors. Symptoms evaluated by the Short-Form 36 and visual analogue scale showed that patients with an unstable segment were in significantly more pain than those without. Furthermore, the surgical procedures determined using the intra-operative measurement system were effective, suggesting that segmental instability influences the symptoms of lumbar degenerative disease

Instability may present at a different level after successful stabilisation of an unstable segment in apparently isolated injuries of the cervical spine. It can give rise to progressive deformity or symptoms which require further treatment. We performed one or more operations for unstable cervical spinal injuries on 121 patients over a period of 90 months. Of these, five were identified as having instability due to an initially unrecognised fracture-subluxation at a different level. We present the details of these five patients and discuss the problems associated with their diagnosis and treatment

There is ambiguity concerning the nomenclature and classification of fractures of the ring of the second cervical vertebra (C2). Disruption of the pars interarticularis which defines true traumatic spondylolisthesis of C2, is often wrongly called a pedicle fracture. Our aim in this study was to assess the influence of asymmetry on the anatomical and functional outcome and to evaluate the criteria of instability established by Roy-Camille et al. We studied the plain radiographs and CT scans of 24 patients: 13 were judged to be asymmetrical, ten were considered unstable and 14 stable. Treatment was with a Minerva jacket in 15 fractures and by operation in nine. Surgery was undertaken in patients with severe C2 to C3 sprains. One patient with an unstable lesion refused operation and was treated conservatively with a poor radiological result. Our study showed that asymmetry of the fracture did not affect the outcomes of treatment and should not therefore influence decisions in treatment. The criteria of Roy-Camille seem to be reliable and useful. We prefer the posterior approach to the cervical spine, which allows both stabilisation of the fracture and correction of a local kyphosis

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of coccygectomy in patients with persistent coccydynia and coccygeal instability.

Aims

To study the associations of lumbar developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) with low back pain (LBP), radicular leg pain, and disability.

Purpose. To determine the effect of leg dominance on trunk muscle activity during bridging exercises on the floor and a gym ball. Background. Perturbation training including bridging exercises and unstable surfaces have been shown to increase trunk activity. Trunk muscle activity increases on the contralateral side to the stabilising leg during bridging, however, no studies exist on the effect of leg dominance on trunk muscle activity during bridging exercises. This study will investigate whether trunk muscle activity differs when stabilising on the dominant versus non-dominant leg. Method. A same subject observational design collected surface electromyography (SEMG) muscle activity for right (R) and left (L) bilateral IO and EO in 2 bridging exercises. (1) feet on the floor, (2) legs on a gym ball. 13 subjects, all right leg dominant (age, 21.53±1.50 years, height 169.38±8.33 centimetres, weight 67.91±10.60 kilograms gave informed consent. All SEMG data was normalized against maximum voluntary contractions. Data was analysed using paired t-test or Wilcoxon rank analysis. Results. In the ball exercise lifting the dominant leg significantly increased RIO (p=0.004), in the floor exercise lifting the dominant leg significantly increased LEO (p=0.03) and RIO (p=0.05). In the ball exercise lifting the non-dominant leg significantly increased LIO p=(0.007) and LEO (p=0016). All other recordings were non-significant. Conclusion. There was no consistency in increase in trunk muscle activity when comparing lifting the dominant and non dominant leg in the two exercise conditions. This may reflect the variability in individual trunk muscle response to perturbations

Aims

To determine the effectiveness of prone traction radiographs in predicting postoperative slip distance, slip angle, changes in disc height, and lordosis after surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine.

Purpose. To describe the frequency of different patterns of pain response and their association with outcomes (prognosis) and MRI findings in patients experiencing sciatica. Methods. 176 consecutive consenting patients with radicular pain underwent an MRI and a clinical assessment at baseline using a standardized procedure of repeated lumbar movements and positioning guided. Based on their pain response, patients were divided into five groups: abolition centralization, reduction centralization, unstable centralization, peripheralization, and no effect on pain. Results. Overall, 84.8 % of patients reported experiencing one of the three forms of centralization, 7.3 % reported peripheralization and 7.9 % reported “No effect”. The median reduction in RMQ scores across all three centralization groups was 9.5 points at 3-months and 12.0 points at 12-months. The peripheralization group improved by a similar amount (7.0 and 14.0 respectively). In contrast, the ‘no effect’ group improved by 3.0 at both time points and this was significantly different (p<0.001) from the other groups. These results were mimicked in relation to leg pain. In addition, there was no association between the reported pain responses (centralization, peripheralization or no effect) and the type of disc lesion observed on MRI. Conclusion. In patients with sciatica, centralization was common. Centralization and peripheralization at baseline were equally associated with improvement in activity limitation and leg pain over time. As there was no association between MRI findings and the pain response to movement, these results do not support the belief that centralization only occurs if the annulus is intact and the intra-discal hydrostatic mechanism is functional

Aims

The current pandemic caused by COVID-19 is the biggest challenge for national health systems for a century. While most medical resources are allocated to treat COVID-19 patients, several non-COVID-19 medical emergencies still need to be treated, including vertebral fractures and spinal cord compression. The aim of this paper is to report the early experience and an organizational protocol for emergency spinal surgery currently being used in a large metropolitan area by an integrated team of orthopaedic surgeons and neurosurgeons.

Aim. To compare spinal outcome measures between patients reviewed for medico-legal compensation claims relating to perceived injury at work to those having sustained serious structural injury in the form of unstable thoraco-lumbar fractures requiring internal fixation. Method. Two consecutive cohorts of 23 patients with healed spinal fractures and 21 patients with a perception of work related soft tissue injury were compared. Patient demographics and a range of outcome measures including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Low Back Outcome score (LBOS), Modified Somatic Perception (MSP) and Modified Zung Depression (MZD) indices were measured. Results. 23 patients (8F; 15M) with spinal fractures (group 1) of average age 42 years (range 22-66) were followed up for a mean of 41 months (range 14-89, SD 23.3) post trauma and compared to 21 patients (6 females; 15 males) with self reported back pain (group 2) of average age 47 years (range 37-63), mean time since perceived injury of 42 months (range 12-62, SD 14.5). Both groups were comparable in terms of age and sex (P = 0.254 and 0.752 respectively). The average ODI was 28% (SD 18.5) compared to 52% (SD 17.1) in group 1 and 2 respectively (P value: 0.000087); LBOS 40 Vs 20 (P=0.000189); MSP 4 Vs 10 (0.01069); and MZD 20 Vs 36 (P=0.000296). Conclusion. Despite high energy trauma and significant structural damage to the spine, post-traumatic patients had better spinal outcome scores in all measures (ODI, LBO, MSP, MZD). This thereby defies 8 of the 9 Bradford Hill criteria of causation. The reasons for such differences are primarily psychosocial. Addressing obstacles to recovery may improve outcomes. There is no ‘dose-response’ curve to functional outcomes. In fact, uniquely the disability seems greater in the lower energy injury which is unique in trauma care