Purpose and background. Acute and chronic spinal pain are major causes of disability, and many patients use analgesics to treat their pain. However, increased use of analgesics, particularly prescription opioids have the potential to be overused and cause dependence. Psychological factors such as stress, anxiety, depression, pain acceptance, pain catastrophising and alexithymia influence both the pain response and analgesic use, yet to date no studies have explored these variables in spinal pain patients. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess the nature, prevalence and correlates of analgesic dependence among patients with acute or chronic spinal pain. Methods and results. Patients over the age of 18 attending outpatient services at the Royal Derby Hospital with complaints of either acute or chronic spinal pain and currently using analgesics to treat their pain completed the Current Opioid Misuse Measure, the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21, the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8, the Pain Catastrophising Scale, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20, and the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire, a measure of analgesic dependence. Preliminary findings from 52 patients (16 males and 36 females) with chronic spinal pain ranging from 23–88 years old, show that greater pain catastrophising is a significant predictor of analgesic dependence (t = 2.74, df = 51, p = 0.009). Conclusion. The study findings can inform the development of appropriate interventions targeting pain catastrophising to prevent and/or treat analgesic dependence, as well as contributing to potential future research on the understanding of tapering spinal pain patients off analgesic medication. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Background. The national back pain pathway sets out the gold standard pathway for patients with back and radicular pain. To improve implementation we needed to understand current practice and identify divergences from the pathway. Objectives. 1) What patient is referred into the surgical clinic?. 2) What treatments had they tried?. 3) How many had spinal interventions. 4) Consider ways to improve the appropriateness of referrals. Method. 100 new patients attending the Spinal Orthopaedic Clinic from December 2018 to February 2019 were asked to complete a questionnaire asking about previous interventions and benefit gained. Symptoms and outcomes were recorded from the clinical entries and MRI's reviewed. Results. Over 90 had tried analgesics with only 60 reporting more than 50% benefit. Only 6 had tried neuromodulators all with poor results. 82 attended physiotherapy with 62 reporting some benefit. 84 tried exercises and 31 found it helpful whereas 17 had acupuncture and 8 of those reported benefit. 65 had consistent findings on their MRI and 31 elected to have an intervention. 8 were better, 22 wanted to self-manage and 4 went to other providers. Conclusion. 82% of our patients had tried analgesics and physical therapy before being referred to secondary care. Few opted to have an intervention and could possibly have been managed in a non-surgical clinic. If appropriate training and management is put into primary care settings, secondary care referrals could be reduced. Only 1/3 of the patients were right patient right place right time. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No funding obtained

Introduction. Analgesic drugs are often prescribed to patients with low back pain (LBP). Recommendations for non-invasive pharmacological management of LBP from recent clinical practice guidelines were compared with each other and with the best available evidence on drug efficacy. Methods. Guideline recommendations concerning opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), paracetamol, antidepressants, anticonvulsants and muscle relaxants from national primary care guidelines published within the last 3 years were included in this review. For each pharmacotherapy, the most recent systematic review was included as the best available evidence on drug efficacy and common adverse effects were summarized. Results. Eight recent national clinical practice guidelines were included in this review (from Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, The Netherlands, UK and US). Guidelines are universally moving away from pharmacotherapy due to the limited efficacy and the risk of adverse effects. NSAIDs have replaced paracetamol as the first choice analgesics for LBP in many guidelines. Opioids are considered to be a last resort in all guidelines, but prescriptions of these medications have been increasing over recent years. Only limited evidence exists for the efficacy of antidepressants and anticonvulsants in chronic LBP. Muscle relaxants are one of the analgesics of first choice in the US, but aren't widely available and thus not widely recommended in most other countries. Conclusions. Upcoming guideline updates should shift their focus from pain to function and from pharmacotherapy to non-pharmacologic treatment options. No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: This review has been supported by a program grant of the Dutch Arthritis Foundation

Lumbar fusion remains the gold standard for the treatment of discogenic back pain. Total disc replacement has fallen out of favor in many institutions. Other motion preservation alternatives, such as nucleus replacement, have had limited success and none are commercially available at this time. Two prospective, nonrandomized multicenter studies of lumbar disc nucleus replacement using the PerQdisc 2.0 nucleus replacement device in patients with lumbar discogenic back pain. Early clinical results are presented. A total of 16 patients from 4 international sites (Germany, Paraguay, Canada and Belgium) were enrolled in the trial between May 2019 and February 2021. Data collection points include baseline and postoperatively at 1, 2, 6, and 12 months. Clinical outcome measures were obtained from the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SF-12V2, Analgesic Score (AS), and radiographic assessments. Prospectively gathered data on patient reported outcomes, neurological outcome, surgical results, radiological analysis, and any adverse events. 16 patients had successful implantation of the device. There have been no expulsions of the device. Early postoperative results are available in 13/16 patients at 6 months and 11/16 patients at 12 months. There have been 4 (25%) revision surgeries 3–12 months post implantation between the two trials. 12 of 13 (92%) patients had Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in ODI at 6 months and 10 of 11 (91%) at 12 months. Mean decrease in ODI from baseline to 12 months was 44.8. At 12 months 8 (73%) patients are not taking pain medication, 1 (9%) patient is taking a narcotic for pain management. 73% of patients are working without restrictions at 12 months post implant. Early clinical and technical results are encouraging. Long term follow up is essential and is forthcoming. Additional patient recruitment and data points are ongoing. FDA/Drug Status Investigational/Not approved

Objective. To identify any difference in clinical outcome between Intra-Capsular facet (IF) and Peri-facet (PF) injections in patients with low back pain (LBP). IF and PF joint steroid injections have been used for treatment of LBP with varied reports of pain relief for many years. Methods. Patients randomised into IF and PF groups. Bilateral L4/5 and L5/S1 levels injected. 40mg of Depo-Medrone with Lignocaine (total 1ml) in IF group. 80mg of Depo-Medrone with 1ml of 0.5% Chirocaine (total 3ml) in PF group. Pain visual analogue score (VAS) and analgesic chart – completed till six months. Results. Eighty eight total, 14 withdrew, 69 with feedback available. Sixty-three (91%) had significant pain relief a week following injection, 86% and 94% in IF & PF groups. Mean duration of pain relief was 12.4 weeks (IF-12.2, PF-12.5). Mean change in VAS before & after injection was 4 (IF-4, PF-4). Mean change in analgesic use before & after injection was 2 tablets. (IF-2.9, PF-2.3). Radiation dose area product (DAP) for IF injections- 603 and PF- 45 mGy.cm. 2. 45 (51%) came for repeat injections, 19 & 26 in IF & PF groups. Conclusions. Majority of patients had pain relief with no statistically significant difference between 2 groups in change in pain severity, duration of pain relief or change in analgesic intake. Significant change in VAS after injection in both groups (from 7 to 3). Pain relief for a mean duration of 12.4 weeks. PF - technically easier- 9 patients randomised to IF group had to have PF injections (facet joint osteophytes). Radiation doses much higher for IF injections even in expert hands (P=0.007). It took double the time to perform IF injections compared to PF (30 and 15 minutes)

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is uncommon in youth and few cases are treated surgically. Very few outcome studies exist for LDH surgery in this age group. Our aim was to explore differences in gender in pre-operative level of disability and outcome of surgery for LDH in patients aged ≤ 20 years using prospectively collected data. From the national Swedish SweSpine register we identified 180 patients with one-year and 108 with two-year follow-up data ≤ 20 years of age, who between the years 2000 and 2010 had a primary operation for LDH. Both male and female patients reported pronounced impairment before the operation in all patient reported outcome measures, with female patients experiencing significantly greater back pain, having greater analgesic requirements and reporting significantly inferior scores in EuroQol (EQ-5D-index), EQ-visual analogue scale, most aspects of Short Form-36 and Oswestry Disabilities Index, when compared with male patients. Surgery conferred a statistically significant improvement in all registered parameters, with few gender discrepancies. Quality of life at one year following surgery normalised in both males and females and only eight patients (4.5%) were dissatisfied with the outcome. Virtually all parameters were stable between the one- and two-year follow-up examination. LDH surgery leads to normal health and a favourable outcome in both male and female patients aged 20 years or younger, who failed to recover after non-operative management. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1675–82

Background. Acute lumbar radiculopathy is a very painful condition sometimes requiring admission for strong analgesia. Purpose. To evaluate the efficacy of distal nerve root blocks as an outpatient procedure for immediate pain relief. Methods. Local anaesthetic was injected in the distal nerve root areas of the leg and foot in the clinic in patients with lumbar radiculopathy who consented to the procedure. Results. There were 29 patients, 18 females and 11 males, aged 25 to 76 years. 13 patients had acute lumbar disc prolapse, 11 had lumbar canal stenosis, 2 had annular tears and one a facet joint cyst. The VAS pain scores ranged from 3 to 11 (patient's description), with an average VAS score of 7.5. The improvement in VAS scores was between 2 and 9 with average improvement of 6. 19 patients had associated back pain which improved in 14. Walking improved in all 29 patients. Pain relief was immediate in all patients. This lasted from 30 min to 11 days with one patient having no recurrence. 27 patients had at least 24 hours pain relief. All patients could be sent home immediately after the procedure. 12 patients had recent onset of foot weakness which improved one MRC grade immediately after the injection. The analgesic effect was most significant in acute disc prolapse. There were no complications. Conclusion. This technique is simple and would be valuable in the acute setting to provide immediate pain relief allowing immediate discharge from accident and emergency. Conflicts of interest: None. Sources of funding: None

Background. Evidence supports that dysfunction of descending inhibition (endogenous analgesic (EA) modulation) contributes towards chronic pain conditions. Research suggests that manual therapy may influence EA modulation; however, this is poorly understood. Trials testing the effect of sustained digital pressure, a commonly used manual therapy technique, using pain pressure threshold (PPT) would give us a better understanding of the influence of manual therapy on EA modulation. A measurement of PPT has been shown to be most effective using fingertip pressure due to the palpatory feedback of symptomatic tissues. Design. A cross-sectional observational study, utilizing a repeated measure approach. Aim. The aim of this research study is to provide preliminary data on the variability of pressure in sustained fingertip pressure in comparison to algometer guided pressure. Methods. Utilizing a pressure algometer, 26 participants were used to test the variability of fingertip pressure in comparison to algometer guided pressure, over 120 seconds. In a randomized order and utilizing two sheets of skin, participants tried to attain, and sustain, a targeted pressure. In the fingertip pressure condition, participants were blinded to the exerted pressure. Conclusion. It was determined that, on average, participants were able to attain the target pressure, but this was highly variable from trial to trial. The test-retest measurement concluded that participants' accuracy was reproducible. Participants were not reproducible in variability when completing the test-retest measurement. There was a relatively higher variability with the lower pressures tested. The order in which the trial was performed, and type of skin did not affect the variability. It was concluded that, whilst some practitioners appear to have a high degree of accuracy with low variability of sustained finger-tip pressure, across a sample population this was not the case bringing into question the mechanism of effect of this common manual therapy technique. Conflict of interest: None. Funding: None

Objectives. This paper describes the outcomes obtained from a 12 hour group based multidisciplinary functional restoration programme for patients with persistent low back pain who presented with psychosocial obstacles to recovery. The programme was designed to address modifiable psychosocial obstacles to recovery over a four week period, reduce pain related disability, improve pain self-efficacy and reduce patients' reliance on analgesic medication. Design. A single group retrospective analysis. Participants. Data from 54 participants with non-specific low back pain (Male = 26. Female =28, mean age 43.7yrs) who attended a four week functional restoration programme between September 2012 and June 2013 were analysed. Results. There was a statistically significant improvement between Oswestry Disability Index and Pain Self Efficacy scores before and after the treatment intervention, and at 9 month follow-up (p<0.001). When only scores at the end of the treatment intervention and month 9 were compared there was no significant difference (p=0.184 for ODI, p=0.341 for PSEQ). Patients also self-reported reduced reliance on analgesic medication after the treatment intervention and at 9 month follow-up. Conclusion. The findings indicate that a group based multidisciplinary functional restoration programme for patients with persistent low back pain, which targets modifiable obstacles to recovery, can be effective in reducing disability, improving self-efficacy and reducing reliance on medication in both the short and medium term. This article has also been published online in Wiley Online Library (. wileyonlinelibrary.com. ) DOI: 10.1002/msc.1078 in Musculoskeletal Care Journal (2014) © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No funding obtained

Background and aims. The EU-funded Back-UP project aims to develop a cloud computer platform to guide the treatment of low back and neck pain (LBNP) in first contact care and early rehabilitation. In order to identify evidence-based treatment options that can be recommended and are accessible to people with LBNP across Europe, we conducted a systematic review of recently published guidelines. Methods. Electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, HMIC, Epistemonikos, PEDro, TRIP, NICE, SIGN, WHO, Guidelines International Network (G-I-N) and DynaMed Plus were searched. We searched for guidelines published by European health professional or guideline development organisations since 2013, focusing on the primary care management of adult patients presenting with back or neck pain (including whiplash associated symptoms, radicular pain, and pregnancy-related LBP). The AGREE-II tool was used to assess the quality of guideline development and reporting. Results. Searches generated 3098 unique citations that were screened for eligibility. A total of 189 full-texts were retrieved, and 18 guidelines were included in the review (from the UK, Germany, France, Italy, Denmark, Poland, Belgium, and the Netherlands). Data extraction showed considerable variation in guideline development processes, especially regarding the methods used for identifying, appraising, and synthesising evidence, and for formulating, agreeing, and grading recommendations. Conclusions. Recommendations for the management of LBNP cover a wide range of treatment options, with self-management advice, analgesics, and exercise proposed as core treatments by most guidelines. A narrative synthesis, taking into account consistency, strength, and quality of guideline recommendations, will be presented. No conflicts of interest. Funding: This abstract presents independent research within the Back-UP project, which has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 777090. This document reflects only the views of the authors, and the European Commission is not liable for any use that may be made of its contents. The information in this document is provided “as is”, without warranty of any kind, and accept no liability for loss or damage suffered by any person using this information

Aims

Closed suction subfascial drainage is widely used after instrumented posterior spinal fusion in patients with a spinal deformity. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of this wound drainage on the outcomes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This was a further analysis of a randomized, multicentre clinical trial reporting on patients after posterior spinal fusion using segmental pedicle screw instrumentation. In this study the incidence of deep surgical site infection (SSI) and chronic postoperative pain at two years’ follow-up are reported.

Aims

People with severe, persistent low back pain (LBP) may be offered lumbar spine fusion surgery if they have had insufficient benefit from recommended non-surgical treatments. However, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2016 guidelines recommended not offering spinal fusion surgery for adults with LBP, except as part of a randomized clinical trial. This survey aims to describe UK clinicians’ views about the suitability of patients for such a future trial, along with their views regarding equipoise for randomizing patients in a future clinical trial comparing lumbar spine fusion surgery to best conservative care (BCC; the FORENSIC-UK trial).

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are an increasing public health problem. Recently, randomised controlled trials on the use of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in the treatment of these fractures have been published, but no definitive conclusions have been reached on the role of these interventions. The major problem encountered when trying to perform a meta-analysis of the available studies for the use of cementoplasty in patients with a VCF is that conservative management has not been standardised. Forms of conservative treatment commonly used in these patients include bed rest, analgesic medication, physiotherapy and bracing. . In this review, we report the best evidence available on the conservative care of patients with osteoporotic VCFs and associated back pain, focusing on the role of the most commonly used spinal orthoses. Although orthoses are used for the management of these patients, to date, there has been only one randomised controlled trial published evaluating their value. Until the best conservative management for patients with VCFs is defined and standardised, no conclusions can be drawn on the superiority or otherwise of cementoplasty techniques over conservative management

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether, after correction of an adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), leaving out the subfascial drain gives results that are no worse than using a drain in terms of total blood loss, drop in haemoglobin level, and opioid consumption.

Aims

With resumption of elective spine surgery services in the UK following the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted a multicentre British Association of Spine Surgeons (BASS) collaborative study to examine the complications and deaths due to COVID-19 at the recovery phase of the pandemic. The aim was to analyze the safety of elective spinal surgery during the pandemic.

To establish whether incidental durotomy complicating lumbar spine surgery adversely affects long-term outcome. Data was collected prospectively. The study population comprised 200 patients. 19 patients who sustained dural tears (Group A) were compared to a control group of 181 patients with no tear (Group B). Outcomes were measured with the SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scores for back (VB) and leg (VL) pain. Scores for the 2 groups were compared pre-operatively, at 2 and 6 months post-op for all patients and at long-term follow-up (range 2-9 years) for patients in group A. In addition for patients in group A the patients satisfaction with the procedure, ongoing symptoms, employment status and analgesic intake were documented. Pre-operative scores were similar between the 2 groups apart from significantly higher vb scores (63 –A vs 46-B). Results at 2 and 6 months showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. Outcome scores for group A at long-term follow-up do not show any significant decline. Our study demonstrates that incidental dural tears complicating lumbar spine surgery do not adversely affect outcome in the long-term

Purpose. To establish whether incidental durotomy complicating lumbar spine surgery adversely affects long-term outcome. Methods. Data was collected prospectively. The study population comprised 200 patients. 19 patients who sustained dural tears (Group A) were compared to a control group of 181 patients with no tear (Group B). Outcomes were measured with the SF-36, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scores for back (VB) and leg (VL) pain. Scores for the 2 groups were compared pre-operatively, at 2 and 6 months post-op for all patients and at long-term follow-up (range 2-9 years) for patients in group A. In addition for patients in group A the patients satisfaction with the procedure, ongoing symptoms, employment status and analgesic intake were documented. Results. Pre-operative scores were similar between the 2 groups apart from significantly higher vb scores (63 –A vs 46-B). Results at 2 and 6 months showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. Outcome scores for group A at long-term follow-up do not show any significant decline. Conclusion. Our study demonstrates that incidental dural tears complicating lumbar spine surgery do not adversely affect outcome in the long-term. Ethics - none, Interest –none

To describe the development of a system of referral, initial data acquisition and subsequent database recording and outcome reporting for metastatic spinal cord compression. Deficiencies in the literature identified by the NICE GDG for MSCC for research were compared with our original database and modifications made to ensure prospective collection of currently recognised and some proposed relevant factors. In addition modifications were made to ensure that all NICE implementation audit data and “target “ data are recorded and can be seamlessly transferred to necessary destinations. This generates standardised reports of the presentation, management and longitudinal interval outcomes including analogue pain scales, analgesic requirement, neurological function, Karnofsky performance indices, Euroquols, and ODIs. It includes pretreatment prognostic indices (updated 2005 Tokuhashi scores) relevant to treatment selection and scale of surgical intervention. Outcomes can be subclassified by type of intervention relative to clinical status at intervention. In house live assessment has revealed some reducing minor operational flaws and initial external assessment is current. A comprehensive information system and treatment guide for this increasing group has been developed and is evolving. Common adoption would facilitate earlier recognition and optimise treatment to diminish the high human and financial cost of MSCC. Currently networks are setting up NSSGs and for this process to be enhanced and to avoid costly duplication adoption of this system modified following peer review is suggested

Purpose of study and background. This study aimed to investigate if the PD-Q classification was predictive of outcomes at 3 and 12-months follow-up in LBP patients with associated leg pain. Identification of clinically important subgroups and targeted treatment is believed to be important in low back pain (LBP) care. The PainDETECT Questionnaire (PD-Q) is designed to classify whether a person has neuropathic pain, based on their self-reported pain characteristics. However, it is unknown whether this classification is a prognostic factor and/or predicts treatment response. Method and results. 145 participants were recruited in secondary care. Inclusion criteria were 3-12 months LBP and leg pain. Baseline PD-Q scores classified participants into three groups (likely to have neuropathic pain, uncertain, unlikely) but did not affect treatment decisions. The outcome measures were LBP, leg pain, activity limitation and self-reported general health. Scores were compared between those with ‘likely’ neuropathic pain (neuropathic group) and ‘unlikely’ (non-neuropathic group), using Mann-Whitney, Friedman and Chi Square tests. At baseline, the neuropathic group had worse scores on all outcome measures, and analgesic use, sick leave, sense of coherence and psychological profile (p=.000 to .044). At 3-months and 12-months both groups improved (p=.001 to .032). However, the groups remained different at each time point on all outcome measures (p=.000 to .033) except LBP (p=.054 to .214). Conclusions. The PD-Q classification was a prognostic factor but was not predictive of response to generic care. Further studies should investigate whether PD-Q groups are predictive of response to neuropathic pain targeted treatment

Back pain is extremely common in soldiers undergoing training. 1. There is no data worldwide with regards to incidence, prevalence and impact of back pain in a deployed military population. This study was undertaken to evaluate these issues. 1000 back pain questionnaire were distributed over a period of four days at the main military base in Basrah in February 2009 in different locations. The filling out was anonymous and completely voluntary. UK military personnel. Information was obtained about age, BMI, length of service, rank, incidence, prevalence, onset, admission rate, treatment, aero-medical evacuation, operational effectiveness, pain killers and VAS. 768 (77%, 26% of population at risk) questionnaires were returned Prevalence of back pain was 33.4% (257). A greater prevalence occurred in the combat arms (41.7%, p=0.01) and those of over 12 years service (44%, p=0.004). No statistical difference was found with rank, or BMI. 74 people (9.6%) had developed new onset back pain since deploying. Recurrent pain occurred in 38.9% of the whole sample. VAS showed a normal distribution. 35% of those affected were discharging their duty with mild difficulty but around 6% were having great difficulty. 25% were on regular analgesics. Back pain constituted 23% (137/583) of the physiotherapy dept caseload, 6.6%, (25/378) of ward admissions and 0.04% (5/119) of aero-med patients. Back pain is a major problem among deployed personnel. However with adequate resources the vast majority can be managed in the field thus reducing attrition rates. 2. and maintaining operational effectiveness. Further studies should be undertaken to assess if back pain persists after deployment