Orthopaedic surgeons prescribe more opioids than any other surgical speciality. Opioids remain the analgesic of choice following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery. There is growing evidence that opioid-sparing protocols may reduce postoperative opioid consumption while adequately addressing patients’ pain. However, there are a lack of prospective, comparative trials evaluating their effectiveness. The objective of the current randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy of a multi-modal, opioid-sparing approach to postoperative pain management in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder and knee surgery. The NO PAin trial is a pragmatic, definitive RCT (NCT04566250) enrolling 200 adult patients undergoing outpatient shoulder or knee arthroscopy. Patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an opioid-sparing group or standard of care. The opioid-sparing group receives a three-pronged prescription package consisting of 1) a non-opioid prescription: naproxen, acetaminophen and pantoprazole, 2) a limited opioid “rescue prescription” of hydromorphone, and 3) a patient education infographic. The control group is the current standard of care as per the treating surgeon, which consists of an opioid analgesic. The primary outcome of interest is oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption up to 6 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcomes are postoperative pain scores, patient satisfaction, quantity of OMEs prescribed and number of opioid refills. Patients are followed at both 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Data analysts and outcome assessors are blinded to the treatment groups. As of December 1, 2021 we have enrolled 166 patients, reaching 83% of target enrolment. Based on the current recruitment rate, we anticipate that enrolment will be completed by the end of January 2022 with final follow-up and study close out completed by March of 2022. The final results will be released at the Canadian Orthopaedic Association Meeting in June 2022 and be presented as follows. The mean difference in OME consumption was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in OMEs prescribed was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in Visual Analogue Pain Scores (VAS) and patient satisfaction are XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The absolute difference in opioid refills was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The results of the current study will demonstrate whether an opioid sparing approach to postoperative outpatient pain management is effective at reducing opioid consumption while adequately addressing postoperative pain in patients undergoing outpatient shoulder and knee arthroscopy. This study is novel in the field of arthroscopic surgery, and its results will help to guide appropriate postoperative analgesic management following these widely performed procedures

Since its creation, labral repair has become the preferred method among surgeons for the arthroscopic treatment of acetabular labral tears resulting in pain and dysfunction for patients. Labral reconstruction is performed mainly in revision hip arthroscopy but can be used in the primary setting when the labrum cannot be repaired or is calcified. The purpose of this study was to compare the survival between primary labral repair and labral reconstruction with survival defined as no further surgery (revision or total hip replacement).

Patients who underwent labral repair or reconstruction between January 2005 and December 2018 in the primary setting were included in the study. Patients were included if they had primary hip arthroscopy with the senior author for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), involving either labral reconstruction or labral repair, and were within the ages of 18 and 65 at the time of surgery. Exclusion criteria included confounding injuries (Leggs Calves Perthes, avascular necrosis, femoral head fracture, etc.), history of unilateral or bilateral hip surgeries, or Tönnis grades of 2 or 3 at the time of surgery. Labral repairs were performed when adequate tissue was available for repair and labral reconstruction was performed when tissue was absent, ossified or torn beyond repair.

A total of 501 labral repairs and 114 labral reconstructions performed in the primary setting were included in the study. Labral reconstruction patients were older (37±10) compared to labral repair (34±11).(p=0.021). Second surgeries were required in 19/114 (17%) of labral reconstruction and 40/501(8%) [odds ratio: 2.3; 95% CI 1.3 to 4.2] (p=0.008). Revision hip arthroscopy were required in 6/114(5%) labral reconstructions and 33/501(6.5%) labral repair (p=0.496). Total hip replacement was required in 13/114 labral reconstructions and 7/501 labral repairs [odds ratio:9.1 95%CI 3.5 to 23] (p=< 0.01). The mean survival for the labral repair group was 10.2 years (95%CI:10 to 10.5) and 11.9 years (98%CI:10.9 to 12.8) in the labral reconstruction group.

Conversion to total hip was required more often following primary labral reconstruction. Revision hip arthroscopy rates were similar between groups as was the mean survival, with both over 10 years. Similar survival was seen in labral repair and reconstruction when strict patient selection criteria are followed.

Malnutrition is an important consideration during the perioperative period and albumin is the most common laboratory surrogate for nutritional status. The purpose of this study is to identify if preoperative serum albumin measurements are predictive of infection following arthroscopic procedures.

Patients undergoing knee, shoulder or hip arthroscopy between 2006–2016 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients with an arthroscopic current procedural terminology code and a preoperative serum albumin measurement were included. Patients with a history of prior infection, including a non-clean wound class, pre-existing wound infection or systemic sepsis were excluded. Independent t-tests where used to compare albumin values in patients with and without the occurrence of a postoperative infection. Pre-operative albumin levels were subsequently evaluated as predictors of infection with logistic regression models.

There were 31,906 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The average age was 55.7 years (standard deviation (SD) 14.62) and average BMI was 31.7 (SD 7.21). The most prevalent comorbidities were hypertension (49.2%), diabetes (18.4%) and smoking history (16.9%). The average preoperative albumin was 4.18 (SD 0.42). There were 45 cases of superficial infection (0.14%), 10 cases of wound dehiscence (0.03%), 17 cases of deep infection (0.05%), 27 cases of septic arthritis or other organ space infection (0.08%) and 95 cases of any infection (0.30%). The preoperative albumin levels for patients who developed septic arthritis (mean difference (MD) 0.20, 95% CI, 0.038, 0.35, P = 0.015) or any infection (MD 0.14, 95% CI 0.05, 0.22, P = 0.002) were significantly lower than the normal population. Additionally, disseminated cancer, Hispanic race, inpatient status and smoking history were significant independent risk factors for infection, while female sex and increasing albumin were protective towards developing any infection. Rates of all infections were found to increase exponentially with decreasing albumin. The relative risk of infection with an albumin of 2 was 3.46 (95% CI, 2.74–4.38) when compared to a normal albumin of 4. For each albumin increase of 0.69, the odds of developing any infection decreases by a factor of 0.52.

This study suggests that preoperative serum albumin is an independent predictor of septic arthritis and all infection following elective arthroscopic procedures. Although the effect of albumin on infection is modest, malnutrition may represent a modifiable risk factor with regard to preventing infection following arthroscopy.

This study presents the results of 60 consecutive hip arthroscopic procedures for the treatment of Acetabulo-Femoral Impingement. The procedures were performed by a single surgeon over a period of 36 months. The learning curve and the evolution of the current technique along with the clinical outcomes are discussed Additionally two new clinical signs of AFI are described, along with the correlation of radiological and arthroscopic findings.

Sixty patients underwent hip arthroscopies. The procedures included labral debridement, labral repair, femoral and/or acetabular osteectomies. All patients underwent MRI examination and three-dimensional CT imaging to identify the impingement lesion. Follow up CT scanning was performed to assess the accuracy of the bony resection. Patients were reviewed at three months and subsequently at twelve monthly intervals. All patients participated in completing questionnaires.

Post-operatively Modified Harris Hip score improved from 54 to 70, Non-Arthritic hip score improved from 58 to 75, SF12 score improved from 35 to 40. Three patients required a second procedure for further bony resection. One patient underwent a THR within 12 months. Two female patients suffered minor vaginal abrasions.

Hip arthroscopy is a demanding procedure. Good clinical results are achieved only when the cause of impingement has been identified and treated.

Orthopaedic surgeons prescribe more opioids than any other surgical speciality. Opioids remain the analgesic of choice following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery. There is growing evidence that opioid-sparing protocols may reduce postoperative opioid consumption while adequately addressing patients’ pain. However, there are a lack of prospective, comparative trials evaluating their effectiveness. The objective of the current randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy of a multi-modal, opioid-sparing approach to postoperative pain management in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder and knee surgery. The NO PAin trial is a pragmatic, definitive RCT (NCT04566250) enrolling 200 adult patients undergoing outpatient shoulder or knee arthroscopy. Patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an opioid-sparing group or standard of care. The opioid-sparing group receives a three-pronged prescription package consisting of 1) a non-opioid prescription: naproxen, acetaminophen and pantoprazole, 2) a limited opioid “rescue prescription” of hydromorphone, and 3) a patient education infographic. The control group is the current standard of care as per the treating surgeon, which consists of an opioid analgesic. The primary outcome of interest is oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption up to 6 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcomes are postoperative pain scores, patient satisfaction, quantity of OMEs prescribed and number of opioid refills. Patients are followed at both 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Data analysts and outcome assessors are blinded to the treatment groups. As of December 1, 2021 we have enrolled 166 patients, reaching 83% of target enrolment. Based on the current recruitment rate, we anticipate that enrolment will be completed by the end of January 2022 with final follow-up and study close out completed by March of 2022. The final results will be released at the Canadian Orthopaedic Association Meeting in June 2022 and be presented as follows. The mean difference in OME consumption was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in OMEs prescribed was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The mean difference in Visual Analogue Pain Scores (VAS) and patient satisfaction are XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The absolute difference in opioid refills was XX (95%CI: YY-YY, p=X). The results of the current study will demonstrate whether an opioid sparing approach to postoperative outpatient pain management is effective at reducing opioid consumption while adequately addressing postoperative pain in patients undergoing outpatient shoulder and knee arthroscopy. This study is novel in the field of arthroscopic surgery, and its results will help to guide appropriate postoperative analgesic management following these widely performed procedures

Recurrent anterior shoulder instability (RASI) is related to progressive bone loss on the glenoid and on the humeral head. Bone deficit magnitude is a well-recognized predictor of recurrence of instability after an arthroscopic Bankart surgery, but the best way to measure it is unknown. In this study, we want to determine which measurement method is the best predictor of recurrence of instability and function. For 10 years now, all patients undergoing surgery for RASI in 4 centers are included in a prospective study: the LUXE cohort. Patients with a pre-operative CT-scan and a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. ISIS score was used to stratify patients. WOSI and Quick-Dash questionnaires were used to characterise function. Bone defects were assessed using the Clock method, the Glenoid Ratio, the Humeral Ratio, the Glenoid Track method and the angle of engagement in the axial plane. A total of 262 patients are now included in the LUXE study. One hundred and three patients met the inclusion criteria for analysis with a majority of male (79%) and a mean age is 28 years old. The median number of dislocations prior to surgery was 6. Seventy patients had an arthroscopic Bankart repair and 33 patients underwent an open Latarjet procedure. The ISIS score for these groups were of 2.7 and 4.8 respectively (p<0.001). The mean bone defect on the glenoid was of 1h51 with the Clock method (range: 0h-4h48; SD=1h46) and of 9% for the glenoid ratio (0–37%, 10%). On the humeral side, the bone defect was of 1h59 (0h-4h08; 0h49) for the Humeral clock method, 15% (0–36%; 6%) with the ratio method and 71 degrees of external rotation (SD=30 degrees) with the angle of engagement measurement. On the combined evaluations, 53 patients presented an off-track lesion, with mean combined hours of 3h53 (SD= 2h13). The greatest correlation obtained was between the glenoid ratio and the glenoid clock method (r=0.919, p<0.001). Eighteen patients had a recurrence of shoulder dislocation after the initial surgery, leading to a recurrence rate of 23% in arthroscopic surgery versus six percent after a Latarjet (OR= 4.6, p=0.034). No bone defect was correlated to Latarjet failure. For the arthroscopic group, the risk of recurrence was related to a smaller angle of engagement of the Hill-Sachs (p=0.05), a smaller Humeral clock measurement (p=0.034) and a longer follow-up (p=0.006). No glenoid or combined measurements were correlated with arthroscopic procedure failure. Recurrence of dislocation was associated to worst function according to the WOSI (1036 vs 573, p=0.002) and DASH (32 vs 15, p=0.03). Even with lower ISIS score, arthroscopic procedures are still leading to high risk of recurrence in this “all comer” consecutive cohort study AND it is related to humeral side parameters. Recurrence is also affecting daily function and creating higher anxiety related to the shoulder

Arthroscopic hip surgery is increasingly common in Australia. Hip arthroscopy is indicated for a range of diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, including labral tears, capsular laxity and femoral-acetabular impingement (FAI). Despite this, previous cohort studies aiming to characterise hip pathology seen on arthroscopic examination are mostly limited to patients with known diagnoses of FAI. Therefore, little is known of the native articular wear patterns encountered in other disease states. Therefore, we aimed to define common osteochondral wear patterns for a cohort of patients managed via hip arthroscopy. We retrospectively analysed intraoperative data for 1127 patients managed via hip arthroscopy between 2008 and 2013, for either therapeutic or diagnostic purposes. Intraoperative data was categorized by location (A-E as defined by Fontana et al. 2016) and chondral damage (0-4 scale as defined by Beck et al. 2005) with respect to both acetabulum and femoral head. Data for 1127 patients were included. Location of acetabular chondral pathology was variable with locations C. 1. and D. 1. representing the most common regions of damage. Labral tears predominated in locations C and D. Femoral chondral pathology was evenly distributed. The degree of femoral chondral injury was predominantly grade 1, whilst acetabular wear was evenly distributed. Large proportions of wear were observed at the peripheral superior and anterior regions of the lunate surface of the acetabulum in keeping with prior works. However, we observed higher rates of central wear and lower rates of grade 4 acetabular damage extending into superior/posterior zones, in our cohort. Our work characterises common articular wear patterns encountered at the time of hip arthroscopy. Further inquiry into the natural history of osteochondral lesions is needed to better understand and manage these conditions

Introduction. Embolism in total arthroplasty or hip fractures, coagulation disorders, such as a variety of ways for the prevention of complications of anticoagulation therapy with medication is being done well. The purpose of this study, a representative of the anticoagulation therapy with enoxaparin and drug rivaroxaban of coagulation tests performed in patients between the two groups was to determine whether statistically significant differences. Methods. 47 patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery were randomly divided into two groups to rivaroxaban and enoxaparin group, and we performed coagulation tests before and 5 days after arthroscopic surgery to two drugs groups in order to investigate about the difference in clotting capacity. Results. Preoperative coagulation tests coagulation tests before the item was not significantly different between the two groups. (p=0.584) 5 days after surgery, the coagulation tests coagulation tests performed on all items, rivaroxaban showed an increase in the anticoagulation activity Between the two groups showed statistically significant difference (p=0.001),. Discussion and Conclusion. Our results indicate that orthopaedic surgery can induce a lot of bleeding will be careful for use of rivaroxaban. Rivaroxaban(Xarelto®) showed more bleeding tendency than Enoxaparin(Clexane®). So we should take more attentions in postoperative care after Total Joint Arthroplasty

From October 2005 to March 2014, we performed 46 arthroscopic surgeries for painful knee after knee arthroplasty. We excluded 16 cases for this study such as, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, infection, patellar clunk syndrome, patellofemoral synovial hyperplasia, aseptic loosening, and follow-up period after arthroscopic surgery less than 6 months. Thirty cases matched the criteria. They had knee pain longer than 6 months after initial total knee arthroplasty (TKA), they had marked tenderness at medial and/or lateral tibiofemoral joint space, and also they complained walking pain with or without resting pain. Twenty one cases had initial TKA at our institute. In consideration of total number of TKA (n=489) in the period at our institute, incident rate of painful knee after initial TKA was 4.3%. Of 30 cases, 3 cases were male, and 27 cases were female. Types of implant were 4 in cruciate retaining type, 1 in cruciate substituting type, and 25 in posterior stabilized type. Age at the arthroscopy was 72 years old (51–87 years old), and period form initial TKA to pain perception was 18 months(1 – 144 months), and period from initial TKA to arthroscopic surgery was 29 months (6 – 125 months), and follow-up period after arthroscopy was 36 months (6 – 93 months). All arthroscopic debridement were performed through 3 portals, anteromedial, anterolateral, and proximal superomedial portal. Scar tissue impingements more than 5 mm wide were found in 87% of the cases both medial and lateral femorotibial joint spaces. Infrapatellar fat pad were covered with whitish scar tissue in all cases, and the scar tissue were connecting with the scar tissue which found at medial or lateral femorotibial joint spaces. We removed all scar tissue with motorized shaver or punches. At final follow-up, complete pain free in 63%, marked improvement in 3%, half improvement in 20%, slight improvement in 3%, and no change in 10% of the cases. Previously in the literatures, two reasons of the pain after total knee arthroplasty had been reported, patellar clunk syndrome, and patellar synovial hyperplasia. All cases reported this study had marked tenderness at tibiofemoral joint space. It was difficult to explain the tenderness by previously reported pathological mechanisms. We had to find another pathological mechanism to explain the pain of our cases. Painful knee due to scar tissue formation known as “infrapatellar contracture syndrome” after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery was previously reported. We hypothesized similar scar tissue formation should occur after TKA that caused painful knee. Continuity of the solid scar tissue between infrapatellar fat pad with the scar tissue at tibiofemoral joint space should be the cause of impingement at femorotibial joint even small size of scar tissue. From this study, we have to recognize that painful knee after TKA is not infrequent complication. And, if we could deny infection, and aseptic loosening in painful knee after TKA, arthroscopic debridement was good option to solve the pain. We could expect improvement of the pain more than half in 87% of cases

Shoulder arthritis in the young adult is a deceptive title. The literature is filled with articles that separate outcomes based on an arbitrary age threshold and attempt to provide recommendations for management and even potential criteria for implanting one strategy over another using age as the primary determinant. However, under the age of 50, as few as one out of five patients will have arthritis that can be accurately classified as osteoarthritis. Other conditions such as post-traumatic arthritis, post-surgical arthritis including capsulorrhaphy arthropathy, and rheumatoid arthritis create a mosaic of pathologic bone and soft tissue changes in our younger patients that distort the conclusions regarding “shoulder arthritis” in the young adult. In addition, we are now seeing more patients with unique conditions that are still poorly understood, including arthritis of the pharmacologically performance-enhanced shoulder. Early arthritis in the young adult is often recognised at the time of arthroscopic surgery performed for other preoperative indications. Palliative treatment is the first option, which equals “debridement.” If the procedure fails to resolve the symptoms, and the symptoms can be localised to an intra-articular source, then additional treatment options may include a variety of cartilage restoration procedures that have been developed primarily for the knee and then subsequently used in the shoulder, including microfracture, and osteochondral grafting. The results of these treatments have been rarely reported with only case series and expert opinion to support their use. When arthritis is moderate or severe in young adults, non-arthroplasty interventions have included arthroscopic capsular release, debridement, acromioplasty, distal clavicle resection, microfracture, osteophyte debridement, axillary nerve neurolysis, and bicep tenotomy or tenodesis, or some combination of these techniques. Again, the literature is very limited, with most case series less than 5 years of follow-up. The results are typically acceptable for pain relief, some functional improvement, but not restoration to completely normal function from the patient's perspective. Attempts to resurface the arthritic joint have resulted in limited benefits over a short period of time in most studies. While a few remarkable procedures have provided reasonable outcomes, they are typically in the hands of the developer of the procedure and subsequently, other surgeons fail to achieve the same results. This has been the case with fascia lata grafting of the glenoid, dermal allografts, meniscal allografts, and even biologic resurfacing with large osteochondral grafts for osteoarthritis. Most surgical interventions that show high value in terms of improvement in quality of life require 10-year follow-up. It is unlikely that any of these arthroscopic procedures or resurfacing procedures will provide outcomes that would be valuable in terms of population healthcare; they are currently used on an individual basis to try to delay progression to arthroplasty, with surgeon bias based on personal experience, training, or expert opinion. Arthroplasty in the young adult remains controversial. Without question, study after study supports total shoulder arthroplasty over hemiarthroplasty once the decision has been made that joint replacement is the only remaining option

Patients often comment on swelling after foot and ankle surgery. However the relationship between swelling and outcome (pain and function) has not previously been outlined. A recent study by Pinsker and Daniels demonstrated that while swelling was rated as important by patients it was rarely included in outcome scores. The purpose of this paper was to determine the relationship between swelling and outcome after ankle fusion or replacement. A secondary purpose was to determine how this relationship changed in time, how swelling score changed before and after surgery, and determine differences in swelling score between total ankle replacement (TAR), open ankle arthrodesis (OAA) and arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA). The COFAS prospective ankle arthritis database enrolls patients in 4 centers undergoing surgery by one of 6 surgeons since 2002. The MODEMS outcomes package from AAOS was used, with the validated ankle osteoarthritis score (AOS) score being used to assess outcomes in the pain and disability domains. The swelling score was indexed from 1 to 5, 1 being no swelling and 5 being severe swelling. Outcomes were recorded preoperatively and annually up to 2010. Statistical analysis was performed using 95% confidence intervals and correlations being determined using Pearson's correlation and r2 values. The swelling score was correlated with AOS score with an r2 of 0.13 for postoperative patients. With the swelling score analysed categorically the difference of outcome was significant with a mean AOS score of 15.1 (CI 13.3 to 16.9) for a swelling score of 1, 23 (CI 21.7 to 24.9) for a swelling score of 2, 31 (CI 29.6 to 33.1) for 33.6 (CI 34.9 to 38.8) for 4, and 39 (CI 35.3 to 43.0) for 5. Swelling scores fell outside the 95% confidence intervals for all groups indicating that the AOS outcome of swelling score 5 patients was worse than the 4 group, 4 worse than 3, 3 worse than 2, and 2 worse than 1. Patients with swelling scores of 1 scored 24 points better than those with a swelling score of 5. Swelling scores were the same preoperatively for total ankle arthroplasty, Arthroscopic and open fusions. However swelling scores were lower for arthroscopic fusions after surgery for all time periods at an average of 2.1 (CI 1.9 to 2.2), compared to total ankle arthroplasty (2.5, CI 2.4 to 2.6) and open ankle fusion (2.5, CI 2.4 to 2.6). Swelling has a major relationship with outcome. Swelling may be the cause of poorer outcomes for open ankle fusion compared to arthroscopic. Swelling is an independent factor as swelling scores for TAA were higher compared to AAA despite similar outcomes. Arthroscopic surgery reduces the postoperative swelling. Methods to reduce swelling such as compression stockings, elevation, controlling bleeding may result in better outcomes. Minimising the invasiveness of surgery achieves this goal. Patient education about swelling, elevation and compression stockings would assist in these goals

Aims

Orthopaedic surgeries are complex, frequently performed procedures associated with significant haemorrhage and perioperative blood transfusion. Given refinements in surgical techniques and changes to transfusion practices, we aim to describe contemporary transfusion practices in orthopaedic surgery in order to inform perioperative planning and blood banking requirements.

Arthrotomy is considered the standard treatment for septic arthritis of the hip. This may be complicated by AVN or postoperative hip instability. Arthroscopic treatment of this condition is still not an established technique despite its minimally invasive nature and being associated with low morbidity. A three portal arthroscopic technique was used for drainage, debridment and irrigation in 13 patients with septic coxarthrosis. Continuous intraarticular irrigation was not performed, nor was decompression drains used. All patients were treated with intravenous antibiotics for three weeks, followed with oral antibiotics for an additional minimum of three weeks. The patients were followed for 1-7 years. Staphylococcus aureus was identified in four of the six patients. All patients had a rapid postoperative recovery. The mean Harris Hip Score at the last review was 97.5 points. All patients had a full range of motion of the affected hip. No complications occurred with this group of patients. Three directional arthroscopic surgery combined with large volume irrigation is an effective treatment modality in cases of septic arthritis of the hip. It is less invasive than arthrotomy, and offers low post surgical morbidity

The management of shoulder instability has changed a great deal in the last five years due to a better understanding of the biomechanics of the shoulder and the use of arthroscopic surgery. It is essential to understand the anatomy of the labrum and bony structures of the shoulder joint, as well as the contribution of these structures as well as the Rotator Cuff to stability in the different positions of the arm. The history and examination still remains the most important diagnostic tool and a thorough history and examination cannot be over-emphasised. MR Arthrography is the investigation of choice in confirming the diagnosis of instability while a CT scan may be required if there is significant bony damage. The most controversial topic is that of the first time dislocator. If there is a significant labral tear then the options of an arthroscopic labral repair or external rotation brace need to be considered. In the absence of a labral tear then physiotherapy is the treatment of choice. For recurrent dislocators, the results of arthroscopic labral repairs with capsular plication techniques are approaching those of the gold standard open stabilisation. If, however, there is significant bony damage to the glenoid or humeral head then a bone block procedure may be the treatment of choice. Rotator Cuff tears need to be excluded in older patients with instability and often in such cases an arthroscopic procedure to deal with the Rotator Cuff and Labrum can be done simultaneously

The suggestion of a meniscal tear produces a pavlovian response in the orthopaedic surgeon. However, meniscal signal anomalies and associated changes become common with age in symptom free knees. T he issue for the IME requested to assess workers with painful knees is to determine if the MRI changes represent a painful injury and if the treatment planned (usually arthroscopy) may, in fact, be harmful. MRI signal changes are assessed on the likelihood they predict for unstable meniscal tears. Some patterns of meniscal tears are benign. Associated changes such as baker's cyst and ligament thickening are also common but are poor predictors of symptomatic tears. Preclinical osteoarthritis has a high incidence of associated meniscal change and arthroscopic menisectomy may accelerate osteoarthritis progression. Clinical tests have variable specificity and sensitivity but in combination with an understanding of the patterns of MRI signal can be combined to predict which meniscal tears would benefit from arthroscopic surgery, which injuries would do as well with non-operative treatment and which patterns predict deterioration after surgery. As the views of the IME are often contrary to the surgeon, a comprehensive bibliography is provided for any who need to argue their case. As the topic is information and image dense, a CD ROM will be distributed

Purpose of the study:. Improved technology, increasing experience and techniques warrant an analysis of cost effective ways of medical management in general and shoulder decompression specifically. The question raised was whether a less invasive technique is necessarily the most cost effective way or merely the surgeons' preferred technique. This is a retrospective study of patients at Tertiary Academic Institution who underwent an open or arthroscopic shoulder decompression in the past 3 years. The aim of the study is to do a cost analysis of shoulder surgery as private health care (medical aid) is demanding more cost effective procedures and we have limited funds in the Government setting. Methods:. We focused on the following: the surgeon; the procedure; operating time; inpatient time; intraoperative block; physiotherapy costs, time off work and the cost of instrumentation used. Patients had to comply with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion: All patients that had shoulder decompression surgery in the past three years by a qualified orthopaedic surgeon; Exclusion: sepsis, tumours, rotator cuff tears, conversion of an arthroscopic procedure to an open procedure intraoperatively, inadequate notes, multiple surgical procedure under the same anaesthetic (e.g. scope with a trapezium excision). Results:. We evaluated 260 patients. Only 147 complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, of which 54 were open decompressions and 73 were arthroscopic decompressions. Arthroscopic surgery was significantly more expensive than open surgery (p<0.0001). Conclusion:. With a 95% confidence level, we concluded that the total cost of an arthroscopic decompression can be between 257.5% and 285.0% higher than that of an open decompression. The outcome of this study has proven that we need to take the cost of every procedure into consideration as our patients can benefit more by the redistribution of funds for other possible procedures. Level of evidence:. Level III

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome is one of the significant reasons for hip pain, loss of ROM at hip joint and developing early osteoarthritis at young active adults. FAI is not a new term and it is treated successfully with open surgical techniques. Some disadvantages of open surgical tecniques has lead orthopedists to develop arthroscopic tecniques. At this study, we aimed to assess the effectiveness of arthroscopy at the treatment of FAI. We included 25 patients (19 male, 6 female) and evaluated retrospectively which has gone under arthroscopic surgery for the treatment of FAÄ° at Gulhane Military Medicine Academy, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology and Ankara Koru Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology between January 2009 and May 2012. We have evaluated modified Harris Hip Score and Visual Analogue Score (VAS) preoperatively and postoperatively at all of our patients. Also we have evaluated, hip internal rotation and flexion range of motions clinically. Mean preoperative Harris Hip Score was 68,52 (range 55–76), mean postoperative score was 88,84 (range 72–98). Mean preoperative flexion ROM was 87, 6 (range 80–95) and 108,2 (range 90–120) postoperatively. Also 4,4 (range 0–5) degrees of mean preoperative internal rotation ROM increased to 19,80 range (10–30) degrees postoperatively. Mean preoperative alpha angle was 76,76 (range 60–90) and it was decreased to 41,76 (range 34–48) postoperatively. Mean preoperative visual analog score were decreased from 8, 63 to 2,8 postoperatively. We had to perform o second look arthroscopy to a patient because of inadequate resection. Also femoral neck stres fracture occured at a patient probably due to early weight bearing. Transient sciatic nevre neuropraxy occured at a 3 patients and, transient ankle pain (approximately 6 weeks) had occured at 2 patients due to traction. Loss of sensation has occured at a patient due to lateral femoral cutaneus nevre injury during portal placement. With these results, we assessed that arthroscopic treatment of the FAI syndrome is succesfull with minor complications comperable to open procedures

Purpose. The development of skills in arthroscopic surgery is essential to the training of modern orthopedic surgeons. Few validated, objective tools exist which track improvement in arthroscopic skills. The purpose of this study was to validate an objective global assessment of arthroscopic skills employing videotape footage of diagnostic arthroscopy performed by participants of various skill levels on a cadaveric knee. Method. A total of 22 participants with varying arthroscopic experience performed a recorded diagnostic knee arthroscopy on a cadaveric knee. Recorded footage of the procedures from an arthroscopic and external view was assessed by five blinded evaluators and scored on a global skills evaluation and checklist evaluation form. Interclass correlation coefficient analyses were used to determine the inter-rater reliability. Mean scores of novice and experienced residents and practicing arthroscopists (based on rank and experience) were compared using a students t-test. Results. Interclass correlation coefficient for the five raters on the global rating scale was 0.626 indicating moderate to good agreement. Interclass correlation coefficient for visual analogue scale skill measurement was 0.645. Discriminant validity was shown by the ability of the global assessment to differentiate novice (95% CI=24-29%) and experienced residents (95% CI=33-59%) from fellows (95% CI=70-87%) and knee arthroscopy staff (95% CI=79-84%). There was a ceiling effect based on the inability to differentiate fellows from knee arthroscopy staff. Conclusion. The Objected Assessment of Arthroscopic Skills global rating scale is a valid, reliable measure of arthroscopic skills in residents. It could be used for evaluative or educational purposes in orthopedic training. The method of blinded evaluation of participants provides a feasible method for the evaluation of resident arthroscopic skills with limited bias which could be implemented in training programs

Regional nerve block for upper limb surgery is an established procedure. Our study was undertaken to look at the patient experience of this. We prospectively studied 59 consecutive patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopic surgery under regional anaesthesia in our department. They completed a questionnaire which they brought back at their first follow up appointment. The questionnaire gathered information of their experience of anaesthesia and surgery, adequate postoperative information. We reviewed if intra-operative pain occurred and if the patients would undergo such a procedure again. All surgeons were upper limb specialists.3 out of 59 patients required conversion to general anaesthetic (5%) due to failure of the block. The introduction of the block was mainly painless;with patients giving a mean scoring of 0.59 on the visual analog pain score (VAS, range 0–5). 26 patients (44%) expressed interest and watched their operation. Of those, 7 patients felt anxious after having the proceedings explained.1 patient discontinued to watch due to this. 10 patients experienced intraoperative pain, 2 requiring local anaesthetic, 8 receiving sedation, giving a mean score of 3.2 on the VAS. 81.4% of patients would have surgery with regional anaesthetic again, 85% would recommend to others. 83% of patients received adequate information. Overall satisfaction of the experience was rated out of 10, with a mean score of 8.7 (median 9). Regional blocks are an established technique. Since patients are awake and can watch their surgery, it is important to consider the patients perception of this experience. The majority of viewing patients were reassured by explanations of their pathology. Most patients would undergo another procedure with regional anaesthesia and would recommend it, suggesting that this is an effective and popular choice. The overall experience is positive. This supports our intention of offering regional blocks for all upper limb surgery, facilitating increasing use of day case facilities, reducing inpatient stays

Introduction. Restrictions placed on the working hours of doctors have led to increasing time-pressures on surgical training. Consequently, there has been growing interest in developing new techniques to teach and assess technical skills. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether a novel set of visual parameters assessing visuospatial ability, fine motor dexterity and gaze control could objectively distinguish between varying levels of arthroscopic experience. The secondary aim was to evaluate the correlations between these new parameters and previously established technical skill assessment methods. Methods. 27 subjects were divided into a “novice” group (n=7), “trainee” group (n=15) and expert group (n=5) based on previous arthroscopic experience. All subjects performed a diagnostic knee arthroscopy task on a simulator. Their performance was assessed using new simple visual parameters that included “prevalence of instrument loss,” “triangulation time” and “prevalence of look downs”. In addition, performance was also evaluated using previously validated technical skill assessment methods (a global rating scale and motion analysis). Results. A significant difference in performance between the groups was demonstrated using all three novel visual parameters, the global rating scale and motion analysis (Mann-Whitney U test, p< 0.05). There were strong and highly significant correlations (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, p< 0.0001) between each of the novel parameters and the previously validated skill assessment methods. Conclusion. This study demonstrates the construct validity of three novel visual parameters for objectively assessing arthroscopic performance. Two of these are simple, can be used easily in the operating theatre, and are highly correlated with current validated methods of technical skill assessment. Given the paramount importance of identifying objective methods for evaluating technical skill in arthroscopic surgery, the generic nature of these simple visual parameters make them a powerful and user-friendly objective assessment tool, which may offer an alternative to existing assessment methods