Hip joint preservation remains a preferred treatment option for hips with mechanically correctable pathologies prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis. The pathologies most amenable to joint preservation are hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement. These pathologies sometimes overlap. Untreated acetabular dysplasia of modest severity always leads to arthrosis if uncorrected. Acetabular dysplasia is best treated by periacetabular osteotomy, usually combined with arthrotomy for management of labral pathology and associated cam-impingement if present. Pre-operative variables associated with the best long-term outcomes include less secondary arthrosis, younger age, and concentric articular surfaces. The earlier PAO series show 20 year survivorship of 81% and 65% in Tonnis Grade 0 and 1 hips. Femoroacetabular impingement has become progressively recognised as perhaps the most common cause of secondary arthrosis. The etiology of impingement is multifactorial and includes both genetic factors and stresses experienced by the hip prior to cessation of growth. Cam impingement can be quantified by the alpha angle as measured on plain radiographs and radial MR sequences. Cam impingement can be treated by arthroscopic or open femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty. As with hip dysplasia, prognosis following treatment is correlated with the severity of pre-operative secondary arthrosis but unfortunately impinging hips more commonly have some degree of arthrosis pre-operatively whereas dysplastic hips can become symptomatic with instability in the absence of arthrosis. The scientific basis for the treatment of pincer impingement is less strong. Unlike cam impingement and hip dysplasia, pincer impingement pathology in the absence of coxa profunda has not been correlated with arthrosis and so rim trimming with labral refixation is probably performed more often than is clinically indicated. Overall, joint preserving surgery remains the preferred treatment for hips with mechanically correctable problems prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis

Hip joint preservation remains a preferred treatment option for hips with mechanically correctable pathologies prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis. The pathologies most amenable to joint preservation are hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement. These pathologies sometimes overlap. Untreated acetabular dysplasia of modest severity always leads to arthrosis if uncorrected. Acetabular dysplasia is best treated by periacetabular osteotomy, usually combined with arthrotomy for management of labral pathology and associated cam-impingement if present. Preoperative variables associated with the best long-term outcomes include less secondary arthrosis, younger age, and concentric articular surfaces. Femoroacetabular impingement has become progressively recognised as perhaps the most common cause of secondary arthrosis. The etiology of impingement is multifactorial and includes both genetic factors and stresses experienced by the hip prior to cessation of growth. Cam impingement can be quantified by the alpha angle as measured on plain radiographs and radial MR sequences. Cam impingement can be treated by arthroscopic or open femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty. As with hip dysplasia, prognosis following treatment is correlated with the severity of preoperative secondary arthrosis but unfortunately impinging hips more commonly have some degree of arthrosis preop whereas dysplastic hips can become symptomic with instability in the absence of arthrosis. The scientific basis for the treatment of pincer impingement is less strong. Unlike cam impingement and hip dysplasia, pincer impingement pathology in the absence of coxa profunda has not been correlated with arthrosis and so rim trimming with labral refixation is probably performed more often than is clinically indicated. Overall, joint preserving surgery remains the preferred treatment for hips with mechanically correctible problems prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis

Hip joint preservation remains a preferred treatment option for hips with mechanically correctable pathologies prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis. The pathologies most amenable to joint preservation are hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement. These pathologies sometimes overlap. Untreated acetabular dysplasia of modest severity, if left uncorrected, always leads to arthrosis. Acetabular dysplasia is best treated by periacetabular osteotomy, usually combined with arthrotomy for management of labral pathology and associated cam-impingement if present. Pre-operative variables associated with the best long-term outcomes include less secondary arthrosis, younger age, and concentric articular surfaces. Femoroacetabular impingement has become progressively recognised as perhaps the most common cause of secondary arthrosis. The etiology of impingement is multifactorial and includes both genetic factors and stresses experienced by the hip prior to cessation of growth. Cam impingement can be quantified by the alpha angle as measured on plain radiographs and radial MR sequences. Further, significant cam impingement is clearly associated with the development of osteoarthrosis. Treatment can be performed either by arthroscopic or open femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty. As with hip dysplasia, prognosis following treatment is correlated with the severity of preoperative secondary arthrosis but unfortunately impinging hips more commonly have some degree of arthrosis preop whereas dysplastic hips can become symptomatic with instability in the absence of arthrosis. The scientific basis for the treatment of pincer impingement is less strong. Unlike cam impingement and hip dysplasia, pincer impingement pathology in the absence of coxa profunda has not been correlated with arthrosis and so rim trimming with labral refixation is probably performed more often than is clinically indicated. Similarly, caution should be exercised when considering rim-trimming for protrusion since high central contact pressures due to an enlarged acetabular notch are not corrected by rim trimming. Overall, joint preserving surgery remains the preferred treatment for hips with mechanically correctable problems prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis

Surgical invention to preserve the native hip joint remains a preferred treatment option for hips in young patients with mechanically correctable pathologies prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis. The two most common pathologies most amenable to joint preservation are hip dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement. These pathologies sometimes overlap. Untreated acetabular dysplasia of modest severity, if left uncorrected, always leads to arthrosis. Acetabular dysplasia is best treated by periacetabular osteotomy, usually combined with arthrotomy for management of labral pathology and associated cam-impingement, if present. Correction of deformities on the femoral side is now less common and reserved for only the more severe combined femoral and acetabular dysplasias or the rare isolated femoral dysplasia. Pre-operative variables associated with the best long-term outcomes include less secondary arthrosis, younger age, and concentric articular surfaces. Femoroacetabular impingement has become progressively recognised as perhaps the most common cause of secondary arthrosis. The etiology of impingement is multifactorial and includes both genetic factors and stresses experienced by the hip prior to cessation of growth. Cam impingement can be quantified by the alpha angle as measured on plain radiographs and radial MR sequences. Further, significant cam impingement is clearly associated with the development of osteoarthrosis. Treatment can be performed either by arthroscopic or open femoral head-neck osteochondroplasty. As with hip dysplasia, prognosis following treatment is correlated with the severity of pre-operative secondary arthrosis but unfortunately impinging hips more commonly have some degree of arthrosis pre-op whereas dysplastic hips can become symptomatic with the onset of instability in the absence of significant secondary arthrosis. The scientific basis for the treatment of pincer impingement is less strong. Unlike cam impingement and hip dysplasia, pincer impingement pathology in the absence of coxa profunda has not been correlated with arthrosis and so rim trimming with labral refixation is probably performed more often than is clinically indicated. Similarly, caution should be exercised when considering rim-trimming for protrusion since high central contact pressures due to an enlarged acetabular notch are not corrected by rim trimming. Overall, joint preserving surgery remains the preferred treatment for hips with mechanically correctable problems prior to the development of significant secondary arthrosis

Arthrosis of the hip joint can be a significant source of pain and dysfunction. While hip replacement surgery has emerged as the gold standard for the treatment of end stage coxarthrosis, there are several non-arthroplasty management options that can help patients with mild and moderate hip arthritis. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to review early prophylactic interventions that may help defer or avoid hip arthroplasty. Nonoperative management for the symptomatic hip involves minimizing joint inflammation and maximizing joint mobility through intra-articular joint injections and exercise therapy. While weight loss, activity modifications, and low impact exercises is generally recommended for patients with arthritis, the effects of these modalities on joint strength and mobility are highly variable. Intra-articular steroid injections tended to offer reliable short-term pain relief (3–4 weeks) but provided unreliable long-term efficacy. Additionally, injections of hyaluronic acid do not appear to provide improved pain relief compared to other modalities. Finally, platelet rich plasma injections do not perform better than HA injections for patients with moderate hip joint arthrosis. Primary hip joint arthrosis is rare, and therefore treatment such as peri-acetabular osteotomies, surgical dislocations, and hip arthroscopy and related procedures are aimed to minimise symptoms but potentially aim to alter the natural history of hip diseases. The state of the articular cartilage at the time of surgery is critical to the success or failure of any joint preservation procedures. Lech et al. reported in a series of dysplastic patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomies that one third of hips survived 30 years without progression of arthritis or conversion to THA. Similarly, surgical dislocation of the hip, while effective for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement, carries a high re-operation rate at 7 years follow up. Finally, as the prevalence of hip arthroscopic procedures continues to rise, it is important to recognise that failure to address the underlying structural pathologies can lead to failure and rapid joint destruction. In summary, several treatment modalities are available for the management of hip pain and dysfunction in patients with a preserved joint space. While joint preservation procedures can help improve pain and function, they rarely alter the natural history of hip disease. The status of the articular cartilage at the time of surgery is the most important predictor of treatment success or failure

Introduction. Humeral head subluxation in patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) and in patients with primary arthrosis has been classified by Hamada and by Walch (type B). These classifications are based on 2D evaluation techniques (AP X-ray view, axial CT images). To our knowledge no 3D evaluation of the direction of humeral head subluxation has been described. Aim. To describe a reproducible 3D measuring technique to evaluate the direction of the humeral head subluxation in shoulder arthropathy. Methods. 72 shoulders with arthrosis type B, 51 nonoperated CTA patients and 151 normal shoulders were 3D reconstructed using Mimics®. The center of rotation on the glenoid was determined using 3-matic® 6.1 with a published technique. Next best fitting sphere of the humeral head and its center was determined. Finally the direction of migration was quantified. The reproducibility of this technique was evaluated using inter- and intra-observer reliability. Results. This technique showed a good inter and intra-observer reliability (p = 0.9). In patients with CTA the humeral head is subluxed in the superoposterior direction (p=0.006) (94°:X-axis; 94° Y-axis versus 92°:X-axis; 92° Y-axis) regardless the type of rotator cuff tear (anterosuperior or superoposterior). In patients with arthrosis type B, the humeral head is subluxed posteriorly (p=0.005) (112°: X-axis; 92° Y-axis versus 92°: X-axis; 92° Y-axis) regardless the type (B1 or B2). Conclusion. With the use of this new developed reproducible measuring technique, the direction of humeral head migration can be evaluated in 3D. In CTA the direction of the migration is superoposterior and in arthrosis type B posteriorly regardless sub-classifications

Patients presenting with arthrosis following high tibial osteotomy (HTO) pose a technical challenge to the surgeon. Slight overcorrection during osteotomy sometimes results in persisting medial unicompartmental arthrosis, but with a valgus knee. A medial UKA is desirable, but will result in further valgus deformity, while a TKA in someone with deformity but intact cruciates may be a disappointment as it is technically challenging. The problem is similar to that of patients with a femoral malunion and arthrosis. The surgeon has to choose where to make the correction. An ‘all inside’ approach is perhaps the simplest. However, this often means extensive release of ligaments to enable ‘balancing’ of the joint, with significant compromise of the soft tissues and reduced range of motion as a consequence. As patients having HTO in the first place are relatively high demand, we have explored a more conservative option, based upon our experience with patient matched guides. We have been performing combined deformity correction and conservative arthroplasty for 5 years, using PSI developed in the MSk Lab. We have now adapted this approach to the failed HTO. By reversing the osteotomy, closing the opening wedge, or opening the closing wedge, we can restore the obliquity of the joint, and preserve the cruciate ligaments. Technique: CT based plans are used, combined with static imaging and on occasion gait data. Planning software is then used to undertake the arthroplasty, and corrective osteotomy. In the planning software, both tibial and femoral sides of the UKA are performed with minimal bone resection. The tibial osteotomy is then reversed to restore joint line obliquity. The placing of osteotomy, and the angling and positioning in relation to the tibial component are crucial. This is more important in the opening of a closing wedge, where the bone but is close to the keel cut. The tibial component is then readjusted to the final ‘Cartier’ angle. Patient guides are then made. These include a tibial cutting guide which locates both the osteotomy and the arthroplasty. At operation, the bone cuts for the arthroplasty are made first, so that these cuts are not performed on stressed bone. The cuts are not in the classical alignment as they are based upon deformed bone so the use of patient specific guides is a real help. The corrective osteotomy is then performed. If a closing wedge is being opened, then a further fibular osteotomy is needed, while the closing of an opening wedge is an easier undertaking. Six cases of corrective osteotomy and partial knee replacement are presented. In all cases, the cruciates have been preserved, together with normal patello-femoral joints. Patient satisfaction is high, because the deformity has been addressed, restoring body image. Gait characteristics are those of UKA, as the ACL has been preserved and joint line obliquity restored

Purpose. The patella provides a mechanical advantage to the knee extensor mechanism. Patellectomy, performed for trauma or patellofemoral arthrosis, does not preclude the development of tibiofemoral arthrosis. Total knee arthroplasty is the mainstay of treatment for tibiofemoral arthrosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of total knee arthoplasty in patients who previously underwent patellectomy. Method. A retrospective analysis was completed on a prospectively collected database to identify all patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty following a previous patellectomy. Sixty-one total knee arthroplasties in 57 patients were identified. Patient demographics as well as functional outcome scores, including WOMAC and Knee Society Scores, were evaluated. Results. Thirty-six females (63.2%) and 21 males (36.8%) underwent a Total knee arthroplasty between July 1984 and April 2010. Mean follow up was 6.0 years (3 months–20 years). Mean Age and BMI was 59.8 8.6 and 30.5 5.8 respectively. Patellectomy was performed for trauma (56) and patellofemoral arthosis (five). All polyethylene inserts were cruciate substituting. There were five deaths and 10 knees (16.4%) required revision surgery. Causes for failure included aseptic loosening (2), polyethylene wear (3), component fracture (2), infection (2) and stiffness (1). WOMAC scores improved from 38.0 14.1 pre-operatively to 58.5 22.1 at latest review. Knee Society scores improved from 81.5 31.2 to 136.0 41.0. Range of motion and extensor lag changed preoperatively from 105.7 15.9 and 4.3 15.5 degrees to 110.7 12.1 and 6.3 7.1 degrees postoperatively. Conclusion. Despite the mechanical disadvantage to the knee extensor mechanism rendered by patellectomy, total knee arthroplasty is an effective treatment option for tibiofemoral arthrosis in these patients

Arthroscopic intervention for early symptoms of arthrosis of the knee was a well-established procedure until Moseley cited his study showing no difference in outcomes when compared to “sham” surgery. Now there is no opportunity for reimbursement with arthroscopic debridement unless mechanical internal derangement can be documented. There are, however, several specific lesions of arthrosis which respond well to arthroscopic intervention and are reimbursed by third party payers. Arthroscopic three compartment microfracture with non-weight bearing and passive motion for eight weeks post- op has significantly relieved symptoms. Second look biopsies have confirmed type II hyaline cartilage and increased joint interval. Proper patient selection is paramount and guidelines will be discussed. Isolated severe patellofemoral arthrosis with patella subluxation responds to arthroscopic patella lateral facetectomy. Jones has reported significant pain relief up to two years with this excellent option for a difficult patient problem. The technique and results will be presented in detail. Loss of terminal extension in the arthritic knee can accelerate deterioration and force earlier decision for TKA. Parson's third tubercle is an osteophyte that forms just anterior to the ACL insertion on the tibia and is the frequent cause of extension loss. Arthroscopic resection of the tubercle results in increased extension and diminishes the stress concentration assuring better longevity for the native knee. The diagnostic characteristics, resection techniques and results of the Dallas series will be presented

Introduction. Resurfacing of the glenohumeral joint has gained popularity since its first introduction in 1958. Advantages of resurfacing over conventional shoulder arthroplasty include preservation of humeral bone stock, closer replication of individual anatomy, reduction of periprosthetic fracture risk, non-violation of medullary canal, and ease of revision to a stemmed component if needed. Materials and Methods. We reviewed a group of patients with arthrosis of the glenohumeral joint who underwent humeral resurfacing, and who were at a minimum of two years post surgery. From January 2000 to March 2011, 51 humeral resurfacing procedures were performed in 49 patients. Patients were contacted for review, and assessed using patient reported outcome measures. An Oxford Shoulder score as well as a subjective satisfaction and outcome questionnaire was completed, as well as details regarding further surgery or revision. 2 patients had died, 11 patients were not contactable, and in 4 the medical files had been lost. In the remaining 32 shoulders, the average follow-up was 5.9 years. The mean age at time of surgery was 62.3 years (range 36 to 84). Results. Complications included 7 revisions (average 2.4 years post surgery), a further 2 patients await revision. There were 2 subscapularis tendon ruptures managed operatively. A further 2 patients required surgery – one for impingement and acromioclavicular joint arthrosis, and the other for instability. The mean Oxford Shoulder score in the unrevised shoulders was 35.4 (range 10 to 47). Conclusion. We have encountered a high rate of revision in patients undergoing humeral resurfacing for glenohumeral arthrosis. In those who have not been revised, there is a wide spread of patient satisfaction as evidenced by the subjective outcome scores. NO DISCLOSURES

Combined Partial Knee Arthroplasty (CPKA) is a promising alternative to Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) for the treatment of multi-compartment arthrosis. Through the simultaneous or staged implantation of multiple Partial Knee Arthroplasties (PKAs), CPKA aims to restore near-normal function of the knee, through retention of the anterior cruciate ligament and native disease-free compartment. Whilst PKA is well established, CPKA is comparatively novel and associated biomechanics are less well understood. Clinically, PKA and CPKA have been shown to better restore knee function compared to TKA, particularly during fast walking. The biomechanical explanation for this superiority remains unclear but may be due to better preservation of the extensor mechanism. This study sought to assess and compare extensor function after PKA, CPKA, and TKA. An instrumented knee extension rig facilitated the measurement extension moment of twenty-four cadaveric knees, which were measured in the native state and then following a sequence of arthroplasty procedures. Eight knees underwent medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA-M), followed by patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) thereby converting to medial Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (BCA-M). In the final round of testing the PKA implants were removed a posterior-cruciate retaining TKA was implanted. The second eight received lateral equivalents (UKA-L then BCA-L) then TKA. The final eight underwent simultaneous Bi-Unicondylar Arthroplasty (Bi-UKA) before TKA. Extensor efficiencies over extension ranges typical of daily tasks were also calculated and differences between arthroplasties were assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance. For both the medial and lateral groups, UKA demonstrated the same extensor function as the native knee. BCA resulted in a small reduction in extensor moment between 70–90° flexion but, in the context of daily activity, extensor efficiency was largely unaffected and no significant reductions were found. TKA, however, resulted in significantly reduced extensor moments, leading to efficiency deficits ranging from 8% to 43% in flexion ranges associated with downhill walking and the stance phase of gait, respectively. Comparing the arthroplasties: TKA was significantly less efficient than both UKA-M and BCA-M over ranges representing stair ascent and gait; TKA showed a significant 23% reduction compared to BCA-L in the same range. There were no differences in efficiency between the UKAs and BCAs over any flexion range and TKA efficiency was consistently lower than all other arthroplasties. Bi-UKA generated the same extensor moment as native knee at flexion angles typical of fast gait (0–30°). Again, TKA displayed significantly reduced extensor moments towards full extension but returned to the normal range in deep flexion. Overall, TKA was significantly less efficient following TKA than Bi-UKA. Recipients of PKA and CPKA have superior functional outcomes compared to TKA, particularly in relation to fast walking. This in vitro study found that both UKA and CPKA better preserve extensor function compared to TKA, especially when evaluated in the context of daily functional tasks. TKA reduced knee extensor efficiency by over 40% at flexion angles associated with gait, arguably the most important activity to maintain patient satisfaction. These findings go some way to explaining functional deficiencies of TKA compared to CPKA observed clinically

Since 2006 we have started to implant modular stelus, ceramic articolar component and Delta cotilus (PF 2006.2007 and TT since 2008) in hip artroplastic of young patients. 53 implantations (4 cases bilateral). Association with conic stelus (14th different shapes from 13 to 26) with trocanterical modulus that permits a good compliance studing each cases (offset-AR-lever-arm). We have found a good resolution using ceramic as matherial in articolar joint because reaching a very high level of satisfaction both for surgeons and for patients outfits. The Delta TT Lima has a titanium trabecular surface that offers a very good primary stability and a very high level in bone integration. The dedicated instrumentary, the design and the matherial high quality are the bases for a good resistance and a good articolar stability. Medium age of patients was 51 y.o. (from 33 to 66 y.o); follow up has been made at the 1st year and the 6th year. Results were evaluated following HHS guide line. Main treated pathologies were: primary arthrosis (9 cases); DCA (21 cases), post thraumatic arthrosis (9 cases), OA (8 cases), hip fractures (6 cases)

The Oxford mobile bearing knee prosthesis (Zimmer Biomet Inc, Warsaw, Ind) is considered a good treatment option for isolated medial compartment knee arthrosis. From February 2001 until August 2016, 1719 primary Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement procedures were completed at our center by a group of seven surgeons. We undertook this study to examine the long-term survivorship of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement looking at survivorship and reasons for failure. A retrospective consecutive case series review was completed, and all revisions and re-operations were identified. Conversion to total knee replacement (TKA) was considered a failure. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate the 15-year survivorship of the group overall. We specifically looked at age, gender, BMI and surgeon caseload in addition to the reasons for failure. A statistical analysis was performed and differences in survivorship were compared for the variables listed. A logistic cox regression was performed to explore predictors of revision. Overall 15-year survivorship was 89.9%. Female survivorship of 88.1% was statistically worse than the male group at 91.8% (p=0.018). Younger patients (75yrs of age (p= 0.036). There was a large range in surgical case load by individual surgeons (range 17–570 knees). There were no statistically significant differences in age, BMI, or gender when comparing the individual surgeon groups. There was a large range in 15-year survivorship between individual surgeons (range 78.3% – 95%). Overall the most common reason for revision was due to wear of the unreplaced portion of the knee (lateral and/or patella-femoral joint) followed by aseptic loosening, polyethylene dislocation, infection or persistent pain. The 15-year survivorship results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement at our center compares favourably to other published series and large registry data series. We found a reduction in survivorship in female patients and younger patients (< 5 5yrs). There were also significant differences in survivorship based on the individual surgeon. A more selective patient approach yielded the best long-term survivorship and equivalent to that of total knee replacement. We therefore suggest using a more selective approach when choosing patients for a medial unicompartmental knee replacement with the Oxford mobile bearing prosthesis in order to enhance long-term survivorship

Background. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is offered to patients who have end-stage knee osteoarthritis to reduce pain and improve functional performance. Knee edema and pain deteriorate the patients' outcomes after TKA at early period. By quantifying the patients' early outcome deficits and their potential relationships to edema and pain may assist in the design of in-patient rehabilitation programs. Objectives. The aim of this study was to investigate of the effect of knee swelling on early patients' outcomes after primary TKA. Design and Methods. The study group consisted of 61 patients (10 males, 51 females), who underwent primary TKR because of knee arthrosis were included in the study with mean age 65.2±9 years. Patients were evaluated regarding knee circumference (10 cm superior of midpoint of patella, midpoint of patella, 10 cm distal of midpoint of patella), pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)), knee range of motion (ROM), the day of active straight leg raise, knee function score (Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS)), Functional activities were evaluated using the Iowa Level of Assistance Scale (ILAS) and walking speed was evaluated using the Iowa Ambulation Velocity Scale (IAVS). Results. There were moderate significant correlation between knee circumference (10 cm superior of midpoint of patella; r=0.328, p=0.001, midpoint of patella; r=0.310, p=0.002, 10 cm distal of midpoint of patella; r=0.300, p=0.003) and IAVS. While, significant low correlation was found between pain level and knee ROM (r=−0.272, p=0.008), there was strong significant correlation between pain level and HSS (r=0.866, p<0.001). There was not significant correlation between knee swelling and all the other measurement, and also between pain and all the other measurement (p>0.05). Conclusion. The moderate correlation between knee swelling and IVAS, low correlation between pain and knee ROM, and also strong correlation between pain and HSS suggests that improved postoperative knee swelling and pain could be important to enhance the potential benefits of TKA in early stage. With improvement in knee swelling and pain the patient may obtain good functional outcomes and knee score

The Gibson and Moore postero-lateral approach is one of the most often used in hip replacement. The advantage of this approach is an easy execution but it's criticized because of its invasivity to muscle-tendinous tissues especially on extrarotators muscles and because of predisposition to posterior dislocation. Since June 2003 we executed total hip replacements using a modified postero-lateral approach which allows to preserve the piriformis and quadratus femoris muscles and to detach just the conjoint tendon (gemelli and obturator internus). Articular capsule is preserved and it will be anatomically sutured at the end of the procedure as well as the conjoint tendon with two transossesous sutures. Piriformis and quadratus femoris muscles result untouched by this approach. We have executed 500 surgeries with this modified approach. We have used different stems (straight, anatomical, modular and short) and press fit acetabular cup with polyethylene or ceramic insert and we have always used 36 mm femoral heads when allowed by the cup dimensions. We have used any size both of stems and cups without limitation due to the surgical approach. The mean age is 61.8 y.o., 324 females and 176 males. Obese patients, hip dysplasia Crowe 3 and 4 and post traumatic arthrosis are exclusion factors for the execution of this approach. If possible we have maintained the capsulo-tendinous less invasivity. The BMI is not an excluding factor because it's just the gluteus region that is an important factor to decide if to execute or not a less invasive approach. Analyzing our 500 cases we didn't have any case of malpositioning of the stem in varus or valgus (more than 5°) and considering acetabular cup we had the tendency to position it in valgus position (not more than 40°) in the first 20 cases. No leg discrepancy more than 1 cm were observed. Intra-operative blood loss have been reduced of about 30 % and 50% in the post-operative. All the patients were able to active hip mobilization within the first day after surgery with a mean range of motion of 0-70°. The patients were mobilized the first day after surgery and 80% of them were able to assisted walk within second day after surgery. The mean time of stay in hospital was 6.8 days. After 4 weeks 98% of the patients were able to walk without crutches. One case of deep infection were evaluated and then solved with surgical debridement; no wound dehiscence. We had 1 case of anterior hip dislocation in dysplastic arthrosis due to a technical mistake. In 1 case we had femoral nerve palsy, then solved, probably because of anterior retractor malpositioning. We had 5 cases of piriformis muscle contracture without sciatic nerve palsy, then solved. We think that for total hip replacement this conservative postero-lateral approach, thanks to capsule-tendinous modification we have adopted, could be considered an anatomical approach, which doesn't present more dislocation risks compared to other approaches to the hip also thanks to the introduction of 36 mm femoral head that gives more stability and proprioceptiveness. Besides this approach gives the possibility of a shorter rehabilitation as seen above and it could be consider optimal for total hip replacement

The biomechanical rationale for osteotomy and the pathogenesis of degenerative arthrosis accompanying malalignment has been delineated well. Malalignment of the limb results in added stress on damaged articular cartilage and causes further loss of articular cartilage that subsequently exacerbates the limb malalignment. A downward spiral of progressive deformity and additional loss of articular cartilage occurs over time. Osteotomy can be used to realign the limb, reduce stress on the articular cartilage at risk and share the load with the opposite compartment of the knee. In appropriately selected patients osteotomy is a reliable operation to improve pain and function. Over the past two decades osteotomy has been viewed largely as a temporizing measure to buy time for patients before they ultimately have a total knee arthroplasty. In this role, osteotomy has largely been accepted as successful. Substantial improvements in pain and function have been documented and seem to hold up well over a 7- to 10-year period after the osteotomy. Medial opening wedge osteotomy has recently gained in popularity in the United States after a long period of use in Europe. Potential advantages of the medial opening wedge technique include the ability to easily adjust the degree of correction intra-operatively, the ability to correct deformities in the sagittal plane as well as the coronal plane, the need to make only one bone cut, and avoiding the tibiofibular joint. The downsides of the opening wedge technique include the need for bone graft to fill the created defect, a potentially higher rate of non-union or delayed union, and a longer period of restricted weight bearing after the procedure

The aim of the study was to assess the results of treating knee osteoarthrosis with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after previous tibia and/or femur fractures resulting in axial limb deformities. Thirty-six knees (34 patients) were operated on. At the most recent follow-up, 4.8 years after surgery, all but one patient demonstrated an improvement in both clinical and functional KSS. This male patient required revision after 2 years due to tibial component aseptic loosening. Improved range of motion was generally noted, especially extension, however, two patients with both tibia and femur fractures had worse results. TKA is an effective method of treatment for patients with arthrosis after a previous femur or tibia fractures. When deformity is severe semi-constrained or constrained, implants with extensions may be necessary

The biomechanical rationale for osteotomy and the pathogenesis of degenerative arthrosis accompanying malalignment has been delineated well. Malalignment of the limb results in added stress on damaged articular cartilage and causes further loss of articular cartilage that subsequently exacerbates the limb malalignment. A downward spiral of progressive deformity and additional loss of articular cartilage occurs over time. Osteotomy can be used to realign the limb, reduce stress on the articular cartilage at risk and share the load with the opposite compartment of the knee. In appropriately selected patients osteotomy is a reliable operation to improve pain and function. Over the past two decades osteotomy has been viewed largely as a temporizing measure to buy time for patients before they ultimately have a total knee arthroplasty. In this role, osteotomy has largely been accepted as successful. Substantial improvements in pain and function have been documented and seem to hold up well over a 7 to 10 year period after the osteotomy. Medial opening wedge osteotomy has recently gained in popularity in the United States after a long period of use in Europe. Potential advantages of the medial opening wedge technique include the ability to easily adjust the degree of correction intraoperatively, the ability to correct deformities in the sagittal plane as well as the coronal plane, the need to make only one bone cut, and avoiding the tibiofibular joint. The downsides of the opening wedge technique include the need for bone graft to fill the created defect, a potentially higher rate of non-union or delayed union, and a longer period of restricted weight bearing after the procedure

There are a variety of potential causes of shoulder arthritis in young patients including osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, and avascular necrosis. However, the primary etiology in my practice is related to complications of instability surgery or labral repair: thermal or anchor/suture related chondrolysis. The outcomes of arthroscopic debridement have been disappointing in patients with shoulder arthritis with worse results with increasing severity of articular cartilage changes. Among all joint arthroplasty procedures, patients who undergo shoulder arthroplasty have the youngest average age. Results of hemiarthroplasty (HA) have been approximately 75% to 80% compared to 90% with total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The largest series in the literature on shoulder arthroplasty in young patients is Schoch et al. They reviewed the results of 56 hemiarthroplasties and 19 TSA performed in patients less than 50 years old with a minimum 20-year follow-up or follow-up until reoperation. Both HA and TSA resulted in significant improvements in pain scores (p<0.001), abduction (p<0.01), and external rotation (p=0.02). Eighty-one percent of shoulders were rated much better or better than pre-operatively. Unsatisfactory ratings in HA were due to reoperations in 25 (glenoid arthrosis in 16) and limited motion, pain, or dissatisfaction in 11. Unsatisfactory ratings in TSA were due to reoperations in 6 (component loosening in 4) and limited motion in 5. Estimated 20-year survival was 75.6% (confidence interval, 65.9–86.5) for HAs and 83.2% (confidence interval, 70.5–97.8) for TSAs

Infection after total hip arthroplasty is a rare but potentially devastating complication. The most common pathogens responsible for these infections are gram positive bacteria. Infection caused by fungi is uncommon. There are few reports of prosthetic joint infection caused by Candida species, and there has no report of implant preservation. We experienced the case of a patient with Candida arthritis who underwent total hip arthroplasty for hip arthrosis, and successfully could preserved prosthetic joint. A 60 year-old woman underwent total hip arthroplasty in September 2014. She had had the past of sepsis by the Candida after surgery of the duodenal cancer. After four weeks in total hip arthroplasty, she made clinic visits. Her chief complaints were low-grade fever of 1 week's duration and discharge from operative scar for THA. The patient underwent arthrocentesis of the left hip. The culture was positive for Candida tropicalis. Operation of surgical debridement and liner change was performed as soon as possible. After operation, the patient was treated with fluconazole intravenously for 28 days. She has continued to taken fluconazole by mouth. Reactivation of infection have not been in her left hip. We reported the case of a patient with Candida arthritis who underwent total hip arthroplasty. Prosthetic joint could have preserved because of early detection for infection. This is the first report of preservating implant after Candida infection in total hip arthroplasty