Aims. This study aimed to analyze the accuracy and errors associated with 3D-printed, patient-specific resection guides (3DP-PSRGs) used for bone tumour resection. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 29 bone tumour resections that used 3DP-PSRGs based on 3D CT and 3D MRI. We evaluated the resection amount errors and resection margin errors relative to the preoperative plans. Guide-fitting errors and guide distortion were evaluated intraoperatively and one month postoperatively, respectively. We categorized each of these error types into three grades (grade 1, < 1 mm; grade 2, 1 to 3 mm; and grade 3, > 3 mm) to evaluate the overall accuracy. Results. The maximum resection amount error was 2 mm. Out of 29 resection amount errors, 15 (51.7%) were grade 1 errors and 14 (48.3%) were grade 2 errors. Complex resections were associated with higher-grade resection amount errors (p < 0.001). The actual resection margins correlated significantly with the planned margins; however, there were some discrepancies. The maximum guide-fitting error was 3 mm. There were 22 (75.9%), five (17.2%), and two (6.9%) grade 1, 2, and 3 guide-fitting errors, respectively. There was no significant association between complex resection and fitting error grades. The guide distortion after one month in all patients was rated as grade 1. Conclusion. In terms of the accurate resection amount according to the preoperative planning, 3DP-PSRGs can be a viable option for bone tumour resection. However, 3DP-PSRG use may be associated with resection margin length discrepancies relative to the planned margins. Such discrepancies should be considered when determining surgical margins. Therefore, a thorough evaluation of the preoperative imaging and surgical planning is still required, even if 3DP-PSRGs are to be used. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):190–197

Objectives. We evaluated the accuracy of augmented reality (AR)-based navigation assistance through simulation of bone tumours in a pig femur model. Methods. We developed an AR-based navigation system for bone tumour resection, which could be used on a tablet PC. To simulate a bone tumour in the pig femur, a cortical window was made in the diaphysis and bone cement was inserted. A total of 133 pig femurs were used and tumour resection was simulated with AR-assisted resection (164 resection in 82 femurs, half by an orthropaedic oncology expert and half by an orthopaedic resident) and resection with the conventional method (82 resection in 41 femurs). In the conventional group, resection was performed after measuring the distance from the edge of the condyle to the expected resection margin with a ruler as per routine clinical practice. Results. The mean error of 164 resections in 82 femurs in the AR group was 1.71 mm (0 to 6). The mean error of 82 resections in 41 femurs in the conventional resection group was 2.64 mm (0 to 11) (p < 0.05, one-way analysis of variance). The probabilities of a surgeon obtaining a 10 mm surgical margin with a 3 mm tolerance were 90.2% in AR-assisted resections, and 70.7% in conventional resections. Conclusion. We demonstrated that the accuracy of tumour resection was satisfactory with the help of the AR navigation system, with the tumour shown as a virtual template. In addition, this concept made the navigation system simple and available without additional cost or time. Cite this article: H. S. Cho, Y. K. Park, S. Gupta, C. Yoon, I. Han, H-S. Kim, H. Choi, J. Hong. Augmented reality in bone tumour resection: An experimental study. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:137–143

INTRODUCTION. Bone tumour resection and subsequent reconstruction remains challenging for the surgeon. Obtaining adequate margins is mandatory to decrease the risk of local recurrence. Improving surgical margins quality without excessive resection, reducing surgical time and increasing the quality of the reconstruction are the main goals of today's research in bone tumour surgical management. With the outstanding improvements in imaging and computerised planning, it is now a standard. However, surgical accuracy is essential in orthopaedic oncologic surgery (Grimmer 2005). Patient specific instruments (PSI) may greatly improve the surgeon's ability to achieve the targeted resection. Thanks to its physical support, PSI can physically guide the blade yielding to a better control over the cutting process (Wong, 2014). Surgical time might significantly be reduced as well when compared to conventional method or navigated procedure. Finally, reconstruction may gain in rapidity and quality especially when allograft is the preferred solution as PSI can be designed as well for allograft cutting (Bellanova, 2013). Since 2011, PSI have systematically been used in our institution for bone tumour resection and when applicable allograft reconstruction. This paper reports the mid- to long-term medical outcomes on a large series. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Between 2011 and 2016, we systematically used PSI to remove bone tumours in 30 patients. The pre-operative planning involved the tumour delineation drawn on MRI by the surgeon. The MRI and obtained tumour volume were transferred to the CT-scan by image fusion (co- registration). Cutting planes were positioned around the tumour including a safe margin. The PSI were designed to ensure a sufficient stability but kept thin enough to limit the bone exposure. The PSI was manufactured by 3D-printing in a biocompatible and sterilisable material. PSI has been intraoperatively to cut the bone with predetermined margins. Medical files were reviewed for large data collection: type, size and site of the tumour, pre-and post-operative metastatic status, bone and soft tissues resection margins, local recurrence, use of an allograft and a PSI for graft adjustment or not for the reconstruction, the fusion of the allograft when applicable, the follow-up time and early/late complications. RESULTS. Over a period of 5 years, 30 patients were operated on with PSI (10 osteosarcomas, 4 chondrosarcomas, 10 Ewing sarcomas and 6 other types of bone tumours). Mean follow-up was 27±20 months. 18 cases out of 30 have more than 2 years follow-up and 13 out of 30 have more than 3 years of follow-up. Mean operating time was 6h02±3h44. Mean size of the tumours was 8,4±4,7cm and location was the upper limb in 5 cases, inferior limb in 15 cases and the pelvis in 10 occurrences. Metastatic disease developed postoperatively in 5 patients. Surgical margins in the bone were R0 in all cases but one case where a R1 surgery was planned to preserve a nerve root. We did not observe any local recurrence in the bone. Within soft tissues, margins were classified as R0 in 28 patients and R1 in 2 patients. In 26 cases, an allograft was used to reconstruct the bone defect. In 23 of those patients, the allograft was selected by CT scan and cut using a PSI. In the 3 allografts cut free-handily, only one demonstrated a fusion. Of the 23 cut with a guide, 12 fused completely, 2 demonstrated a partial fusion and 9 were not fused at the last follow-up. At the last follow-up, 2 patients were dead of disease, 5 were alive with metastatic disease and 23 were alive without disease. DISCUSSION. Oncology is probably the field where PSI can bring the largest advantage when compared to the conventional procedure. Several papers have reported the use of PSI for bone tumour resection. All of them have shown very promising results on in-vitro experiments (Cartiaux 2014), cadaver experiment (Wong 2012) or small clinical series (Bellanova 2013, Gouin, 2014). None of these papers report a large patient series associated with a clinically relevant follow-up. This series is the first mid- to long-term follow-up series involving PSI tumour surgery. These results are showing strong evidences of clinical improvements. It comes into contradiction with PSI for total knee arthroplasty where controversial results on the patient's outcome has been reported (Thienpont 2014). R0 margin has been systematically obtained for all bone cuttings, and local recurrence has been strongly decreased (3%) when compared to the usual recurrence rates published in the literature (from 15% to 35% according to the location). Allograft fusion seems improved as well thanks to the shape-matching of the selected allograft and a close contact between host and allograft at bony junctions. With a longer follow-up, these evidences should be stronger to definitely make PSI the best option for bone tumour resection

The February 2024 Oncology Roundup. 360. looks at: Does primary tumour resection improve survival for patients with sarcomas of the pelvis with metastasis at diagnosis?; Proximal femur replacements for an oncologic indication offer a durable endoprosthetic reconstruction option: a 40-year experience; The importance of awaiting biopsy results in solitary pathological proximal femoral fractures: do we need to biopsy solitary pathological fractures?; Effect of radiotherapy on local recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival in 1,200 extremity soft-tissue sarcoma patients; What to choose in bone tumour resections? Patient-specific instrumentation versus surgical navigation; Optimal timing of re-excision in synovial sarcoma patients: immediate intervention versus waiting for local recurrence; Survival differences of patients with resected extraskeletal osteosarcoma receiving two different (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy regimens; Solitary versus multiple bone metastases in the appendicular skeleton: should the surgical treatment be different?

Aims

The consensus is that bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) in allograft-prosthesis composite (APC) reconstruction of the proximal femur following primary tumour resection provides more stability than total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, no comparative study has been performed. In this study, we have compared the outcome and complication rates of these two methods.

Resecting bone tumours within the pelvis is highly challenging and requires good cutting accuracy to achieve sufficient margins. Computer-assisted technologies such as intraoperative navigation have been developed for pelvic bone tumour resection. Patient-specific instruments have been transposed to tumour surgery. The present study reports a series of 11 clinical cases of PSI-assisted bone tumour surgery within the pelvis, and assesses how accurately a preoperative resection strategy can be replicated intraoperatively with the PSI.

The patient series consisted in 11 patients eligible for curative surgical resection of primary bone tumor of the pelvis. Eight patients had a bone sarcoma of iliac bone involving the acetabulum, two patients had a sacral tumor, and one patient had a chondrosarcoma of proximal femur with intra-articular hip extension. Resection planning was preoperatively defined including a safe margin defined by the surgeon from 3 up to 15 mm. PSI were designed using a computer-aided design software according to the desired resection strategy and produced by additive manufacturing technology. Intraoperatively, PSI were positioned freehand by the surgeon and fixed on the bone surface using K-wires. The standard surgical approach has been used for each patient. Dissection was in accordance with the routine technique. There was no additional bone exposure to position the PSI. Histopathological analysis of the resected tumor specimens was performed to evaluate the achieved resection margins. Postoperative CT were acquired and matched to the preoperative CT to assess the local control of the tumor. Two parameters were measured: achieved resection margin (minimum distance to the tumor) and location accuracy (maximum distance between achieved and planned cuttings; ISO1101 standard).

PSI were quick and easy to use with a positioning onto the bone surface in less than 5 minutes for all cases. The positioning of the PSI was considered unambiguous for all patients. Histopathological analysis classified all achieved resection margins as R0 (tumor-free), except for two patients : R2 because of a morcelised tumour and R1 in soft tissues. The errors in safe margin averaged −0.8 mm (95% CI: −1.8 mm to 0.1 mm). The location accuracy of the achieved cut planes with respect to the desired cut planes averaged 2.5 mm (95% CI: 1.8 to 3.2 mm).

Results in terms of safe margin or the location accuracy demonstrated how PSI enabled the surgeon to intraoperatively replicate the resection strategies with a very good cutting accuracy. These findings are consistent with the levels of bone-cutting accuracy published in the literature. PSI technology described in this study achieved clear bone margins for all patients. Longer follow-up period is required but it appears that PSI has the potential to provide clinically acceptable margins.

Purpose of the study: Transfer of a vascularised fibular is an option after tumour resection to save the limb.

Material and methods: Thirty-eight consecutive cases of malignant bone tumours located in the shaft of long bones of the lower limb were treated with a free transfer of a vascularised fibula. There were 30 femoral localisations and 8 tibial localisations, 32 first-intention transfers and six transfers after failure of an allograft. Mean age at transfer was 11.8 years (range 4.33–22.57). Adapted chemotherapy was associated. The Musculo-skeletal Tumour Society score was noted for the functional assessment. Healing was considered achieved when there was a bone bridge between the transplant and the recipient bone associated with disappearance of the osteotomy line. Outcome was expressed as mean or percentage with the 95% confidence interval. P< 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Mean follow-up for the 38 patients was 7.56 years (range 0.37–18.4). The mean MSTS was 27.2 (range 20–30).. This mean score was significantly higher (S t = 2.11> 2.04) for vascularised fibular transfer surgery immediately after tumour resection (27.4) than after revision surgery (25.4). The healing rate was 89%. The rate of healing failure of the vascularised free transfer was significantly greater (p=0.005< 0.05) after revision (33%) than after immediate transfer (6%). The rate of good results in the Boer classification was significantly higher for tibial than femoral reconstructions (p=0.006< 0.05), for immediate surgery than revision surgery (p=0.005< 0.05), and for Ewing tumours than for osteosarcoma (p=0.0019< 0.05).

Discussion: Free transfer of a vascularised fibula is a reliable reconstruction technique for bone shaft loss of the lower limb after resection of a malignant bone tumour in children. This is a mutilating surgery with frequent complications but which can save the limb. This reconstruction surgery should be done at the same time as the resection. Healing of the vascularised fibular transplant is more difficult to achieve for femoral reconstructions than tibial reconstruction and there are more complications in the femoral localisation. Femoral reconstructions using a vascularised fibular transplant should be associated with an allograft.

Background

In certain clinical situations, complex local anatomy and limitations of surgical exposure can make adequate and bone tumor ablation, resection and reconstruction very challenging. We wished to review our clinical experience and accuracy achieved with entirely virtually planned single stage tumor ablation/resection and reconstructions.

En-bloc resection, extracorporeal irradiation and re-implantation of the irradiated bone have been used to treat 15 patients suffering from primary malignant tumours of bone or cartilage and two with benign lesions. This treatment is an alternative to replacement by prosthesis or allograft bridging techniques. After a mean follow-up of over five years results are encouraging, despite some complications and the relatively long period before weight-bearing is allowed.

In order to investigate the efficacy of free vascularised fibular graft (VFG) after bone intercalary tumour resection in tibia, we present our results with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. From 1988 to 2001, 47 patients affected by high-grade tibial sarcoma in 31 cases (66%), and low-grade diesease in 16 cases (34%) were treated in our department. Average age was 19 years (range 5–60 years), with a male/female ratio of 1.35. The average length of tibial resection was 15 cm, while the average length of the fibular graft was 19 cm. In 11 cases (21%) VFG was assembled alone, while in 36 cases (79%) a massive bone allograft was associated to the fibula. Three patients developed a deep infection, treated by amputation in two cases and by graft removal and an Ilizarov device in one case. Minor complications occurred in 28 cases (55%) (stress fractures, wound slough, osteosynthesis breakage), all healed by minor surgery or conservative treatment. At an average follow-up of 108 months (range 24 to 185 months), four patients had died of disease and three were lost to follow-up. Regarding the overall results, the combined group of fibula plus massive allograft showed to be more effective than the group of fibula alone in terms of early weight bearing (6 versus 12 months), while VFG showed intrinsic efficacy in achieving early bony fusion at the osteotomy lines and hypertrophy of the graft in both groups. Furthermore, using the combined assembly the articular surface could be spared in all the trans-epiphyseal resections, while VFG alone appeared to be electively indicated for infected or irradiated fields.

In conclusion, despite the demanding surgical technique, VFG appears to be a long-lasting and definitive biological reconstruction procedure after intercalary tibial resection.

The June 2024 Oncology Roundup. 360. looks at: Chondrosarcoma of the femur: is local recurrence influenced by the presence of an extraosseous component?; Diagnostic challenges in low-grade central osteosarcoma; Single osteotomy technique for frozen autograft (pedicled freezing) in patients with malignant bone tumours; Unplanned resection for small superficial soft-tissue sarcomas: disastrous or simply bad?; Inactivation and replantation of the knee joint: an infeasible surgical method; Active surveillance of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumours: a retrospective, multicentre cohort study

Objectives. Deep bone and joint infections (DBJI) are directly intertwined with health, demographic change towards an elderly population, and wellbeing. The elderly human population is more prone to acquire infections, and the consequences such as pain, reduced quality of life, morbidity, absence from work and premature retirement due to disability place significant burdens on already strained healthcare systems and societal budgets. DBJIs are less responsive to systemic antibiotics because of poor vascular perfusion in necrotic bone, large bone defects and persistent biofilm-based infection. Emerging bacterial resistance poses a major threat and new innovative treatment modalities are urgently needed to curb its current trajectory. Materials and Methods. We present a new biphasic ceramic bone substitute consisting of hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate for local antibiotic delivery in combination with bone regeneration. Gentamicin release was measured in four setups: 1) in vitro elution in Ringer’s solution; 2) local elution in patients treated for trochanteric hip fractures or uncemented hip revisions; 3) local elution in patients treated with a bone tumour resection; and 4) local elution in patients treated surgically for chronic corticomedullary osteomyelitis. Results. The release pattern in vitro was comparable with the obtained release in the patient studies. No recurrence was detected in the osteomyelitis group at latest follow-up (minimum 1.5 years). Conclusions. This new biphasic bone substitute containing antibiotics provides safe prevention of bone infections in a range of clinical situations. The in vitro test method predicts the in vivo performance and makes it a reliable tool in the development of future antibiotic-eluting bone-regenerating materials. Cite this article: M. Stravinskas, P. Horstmann, J. Ferguson, W. Hettwer, M. Nilsson, S. Tarasevicius, M. M. Petersen, M. A. McNally, L. Lidgren. Pharmacokinetics of gentamicin eluted from a regenerating bone graft substitute: In vitro and clinical release studies. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:427–435. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.59.BJR-2016-0108.R1

Introduction. Clear operative oncological margins are the main target in malignant bone tumour resections. Novel techniques like patient specific instruments (PSIs) are becoming more popular in orthopaedic oncology surgeries and arthroplasty in general with studies suggesting improved accuracy and reduced operating time using PSIs compared to conventional techniques and computer assisted surgery. Improved accuracy would allow preservation of more natural bone of patients with smaller tumour margin. Novel low-cost technology improving accuracy of surgical cuts, would facilitate highly delicate surgeries such as Joint Preserving Surgery (JPS) that improves quality of life for patients by preserving the tibial plateau and muscle attachments around the knee whilst removing bone tumours with adequate tumour margins. There are no universal guidelines on PSI designs and there are no studies showing how specific design of PSIs would affect accuracy of the surgical cuts. We hypothesised if an increased depth of the cutting slot guide for sawblades on the PSI would improve accuracy of cuts. Methods. A pilot drybone experiment was set up, testing 3 different designs of a PSI with changing cutting slot depth, simulating removal of a tumour on the proximal tibia (figure 1). A handheld 3D scanner (Artec Spider, Luxembourg) was used to scan tibia drybones and Computer Aided Design (CAD) software was used to simulate osteosarcoma position and plan intentioned cuts (figure 1). PSI were designed accordingly to allow sufficient tumour. The only change for the 3 designs is the cutting slot depth (10mm, 15mm & 20mm). 7 orthopaedic surgeons were recruited to participate and perform JPS on the drybones using each design 2 times. Each fragment was then scanned with the 3D scanner and were then matched onto the reference tibia with customized software to calculate how each cut (inferior-superior-vertical) deviated from plan in millimetres and degrees (figure 3). In order to tackle PSI placement error, a dedicated 3D-printed mould was used. Results. Comparing actual cuts to planned cuts, changing the height of the cutting slot guide on the designed PSI did not deviate accuracy enough to interfere with a tumour resection margin set to maximum 10mm. We have obtained very accurate cuts with the mean deviations(error) for the 3 different designs were: [10mm slot: 0.76±0.52mm, 2.37±1.26°], [15mm slot: 0.43±0.40mm, 1.89±1.04°] and [20mm: 0.74±0.65mm, 2.40±1.78°] respectively, with no significant difference between mean error for each design overall, but the inferior cuts deviation in mm did show to be more precise with 15mm cutting slot (p<0.05) (figure 2). Discussion. Simulating a cut to resect an osteosarcoma, none of the proposed designs introduced error that would interfere with the tumour margin set. Though 15mm showed increased precision on only one parameter, we concluded that 10mm cutting slot would be sufficient for the accuracy needed for this specific surgical intervention. Future work would include comparing PSI slot depth with position of knee implants after arthroplasty, and how optimisation of other design parameters of PSIs can continue to improve accuracy of orthopaedic surgery and allow increase of bone and joint preservation. For figures/tables, please contact authors directly.

The use of massive endoprostheses following bone tumour resection is well recognised. Where possible, joint salvage rather than joint replacement is usually attempted. However cases arise where there is insufficient bone following tumour resection to allow adequate fixation of a joint sparing prosthesis. We reporta series of 4 patients (aged 4–12), treated between 1994 and 2008, in which irradiated autologous bone has been combined with a diaphyseal or distal femoral replacement in order to preserve the native hip joint. There were 3 cases of osteosarcoma and 1 case of Ewing‘s sarcoma. After a mean follow-up of 53.5 months (range 9–168), all four patients are alive without evidence of local recurrence or metastases. One implant was revised after 14 years following fracture of the extending component of the growing endoprosthesis. There have been no cases of loosening or periprosthetic fracture. This is the first report of irradiated autologous bone with joint sparing endoprostheses in skeletally immature patients

Aims and methods. We present a review of our use of the Ilizarov apparatus in a non-acute NGO hospital in Cambodia specialising in limb reconstruction. Frames are applied without on table image intensification. A retrospective case-note analysis of Ilizarov apparatus use for all indications was conducted. 53 frames were applied between November 2005 and October 2011. Indications for application were chronic open fracture, osteomyelitis, fracture malunion, infective and non-infective non-union, bone lengthening, primary bone tumour resection, ankle fusion, congenital deformity or pseudarthrosis, chronic hip dislocation, or a combination of the above. Results. Median delay in presentation was 104 weeks for all indications (range 4–864). Median treatment length was 21 weeks (3–76). The most frequent complication was pin-site infection. This occurred in 18 patients (34%). Return to theatre occurred in 21 patients (40%). Indications were frame adjustment, pin addition or removal, addition of bone graft or re-osteotomy. Failure of union occurred in three patients. These rates are comparable with those published in both Asian and Western literature. Conclusions. Our data demonstrate the versatility of the Ilizarov apparatus and its importance in limb reconstruction in a developing world setting. Our centre relies on it as a cost-effective tool for traditional and novel indications. In our centre the apparatus is applied without x-ray control and is maintained without a dedicated outreach pin-site care programme. Despite this our complication rates are comparable with western literature. We therefore recommend it as a safe and cost-effective tool for use in other developing world settings

The aim of this project is to test the parameters of Patient Specific Instruments (PSIs) and measuring accuracy of surgical cuts using sawblades with different depths of PSI cutting guide slot. Clear operative oncological margins are the main target in malignant bone tumour resections. Novel techniques like patient specific instruments (PSIs) are becoming more popular in orthopaedic oncology surgeries and arthroplasty in general with studies suggesting improved accuracy and reduced operating time using PSIs compared to conventional techniques and computer assisted surgery. Improved accuracy would allow preservation of more natural bone of patients with smaller tumour margin. Novel low-cost technology improving accuracy of surgical cuts, would facilitate highly delicate surgeries such as Joint Preserving Surgery (JPS) that improves quality of life for patients by preserving the tibial plateau and muscle attachments around the knee whilst removing bone tumours with adequate tumour margins. There are no universal guidelines on PSI designs and there are no studies showing how specific design of PSIs would affect accuracy of the surgical cuts. We hypothesised if an increased depth of the cutting slot guide for sawblades on the PSI would improve accuracy of cuts. A pilot drybone experiment was set up, testing 3 different designs of a PSI with changing cutting slot depth, simulating removal of a tumour on the proximal tibia. A handheld 3D scanner (Artec Spider, Luxembourg) was used to scan tibia drybones and Computer Aided Design (CAD) software was used to simulate osteosarcoma position and plan intentioned cuts. PSI were designed accordingly to allow sufficient tumour. The only change for the 3 designs is the cutting slot depth (10mm, 15mm & 20mm). 7 orthopaedic surgeons were recruited to participate and perform JPS on the drybones using each design 2 times. Each fragment was then scanned with the 3D scanner and were then matched onto the reference tibia with customized software to calculate how each cut (inferior-superior-vertical) deviated from plan in millimetres and degrees. In order to tackle PSI placement error, a dedicated 3D-printed mould was used. Comparing actual cuts to planned cuts, changing the height of the cutting slot guide on the designed PSI did not deviate accuracy enough to interfere with a tumour resection margin set to maximum 10mm. We have obtained very accurate cuts with the mean deviations(error) for the 3 different designs were: [10mm slot: 0.76 ± 0.52mm, 2.37 ± 1.26°], [15 mm slot: 0.43 ± 0.40 mm, 1.89 ± 1.04°] and [20 mm: 0.74 ± 0.65 mm, 2.40 ± 1.78°] respectively, with no significant difference between mean error for each design overall, but the inferior cuts deviation in mm did show to be more precise with 15 mm cutting slot (p<0.05). Simulating a cut to resect an osteosarcoma, none of the proposed designs introduced error that would interfere with the tumour margin set. Though 15mm showed increased precision on only one parameter, we concluded that 10mm cutting slot would be sufficient for the accuracy needed for this specific surgical intervention. Future work would include comparing PSI slot depth with position of knee implants after arthroplasty, and how optimisation of other design parameters of PSIs can continue to improve accuracy of orthopaedic surgery and allow increase of bone and joint preservation

The use of massive endoprostheses following bone tumour resection is well recognised. Where possible, joint salvage rather than joint replacement is usually attempted. However cases arise where there may be insufficient bone stock following tumour resection to allow fixation of a joint sparing prosthesis. We report a series of 4 patients (age4–12) treated between 1994 and 2008, in which irradiated autologous bone has been combined with a diaphyseal or distal femoral replacement in order to preserve the native hip joint. There were 3 cases of osteosarcoma and 1 cases of Ewings sarcoma. After a mean follow up of 53 months (range 9–168) all patients had survived without evidence of local recurrence or metastases. One implant was revised after 14 years following fracture of the extending component of the growing endoprosthesis. There have been no cases of loosening or peri-prosthetic fracture. This is the first report of irradiated autologous bone with joint sparing endoprostheses in the skeletally immature patient. Introduction: Reconstruction of segmental skeletal defects after malignant bone tumour removal has been a topic of much debate. Autoclaved or irradiated autologous bone used in the treatment of malignant bone tumours of the proximal femur in skeletally mature patients has been well reported with a high incidence of fracture and non-union. On follow up, our series of skeletally immature patients showed excellent osteo-integration with native bone and allowed preservation of the native hip joint. Results: We review survival of the patient, implant, any complication and the presence of disease progression

Introduction. Following bone tumour resection, lower limb reconstruction results in leg-length discrepancy in skeletally immature patients. Previously, minimally invasive endoprostheses have been associated with a high risk of complications including joint stiffness, nerve injury, aseptic loosening and infection. The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome of the Stanmore non-invasive extendible endoprostheses used in our institution between 2002 and 2009 and compare them with implants used in the past. Methods. Fifty-five children with a mean age of 11.4 years (5 to 16) underwent limb reconstruction with thirty-three distal femoral, two total femoral, eight proximal femoral and twelve proximal tibial implants. Forty-six endoprostheses were lengthened in clinic without anaesthesia using the principle of electromagnetic induction. Patients were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society Score (MSTS) and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS). Results. Ten children (18.2%) died of disseminated disease. One child underwent amputation for infected prosthesis. Forty-four patients were reviewed after a mean follow-up of 41 months (16 to 98). The mean MSTS score was 80.7% (26.7-100) and the TESS score was 92.3% (55.2-99). There was no local tumour recurrence. Complications developed in sixteen patients (29.1%). Seven patients (12.7%) underwent ten revision procedures. The mean length gained per patient was 38.6mm (3.5 to 161.5) requiring a mean of 11.3 (1-40) extensions. Ten component exchanges were performed in nine patients (16.4%) after attaining the maximum lengthening capacity of the implant. Eleven patients (20%) were skeletally mature at follow-up, of which ten had equal leg-lengths and nine had full range of hip and knee movement. Overall our outcomes compared favourably with minimal endoprostheses and other non-invasive designs. Discussion. This is the largest reported series of non-invasive extendible endoprostheses, demonstrating good functional outcome with prevention of limb-length discrepancy at skeletal maturity

Introduction. Primary bone tumours of the distal radius are rare, while it remains the third commonest site for primary lesions and recurrences of Giant Cell Tumours (GCT). The functional demands on the hand make reconstruction of the wrist joint following the excision of distal radius, particularly challenging. Methods. A single-centre retrospective study, reporting the functional and oncological outcomes of six patients (4 males, 2 females - mean age of 53 (22 to 79)) who underwent a custom-made endoprosthetic replacement of the distal radius with arthrodesis at our institution, during 1999 - 2010. Five patients were diagnosed with primary bone sarcoma of the distal radius (4 GCTs, 1 osteosarcoma) and another had a metastatic lesion from a primary renal cell carcinoma. The diagnosis was confirmed by needle biopsy in all cases. We assessed the patients' functional outcomes using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society scoring system (MSTS) and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS). Results. The mean follow-up was 3 years (up to 9.5 years). One patient died of unrelated medical causes, age 89, and one patient succumbed to renal carcinoma, age 53 (9.5 and 4 years post-operatively). All prostheses remained clinically and radiologically stable. One-year radiographs confirmed bone remodelling and osseointegration at the bone-prosthesis interface. There were no cases of local recurrence, metastases, infection or wound complications post-operatively. The mean functional outcome scores were: MSTS 73% (71 to 78), TESS 75% (73 to 79). Pain-free hand movements were restored in all cases. Discussion. Reconstruction options include curettage with/without grafting or cementing, ulna translocation, autografts (vascularised or non-vascularised ⊞/⊟ arthrodesis), allografts, custom-made megaprostheses. Custom-made endoprosthetic reconstruction of the distal radius with wrist arthrodesis following bone tumour resection represents a viable and versatile treatment option. Satisfactory outcomes are achieved with acceptable risks and functional outcomes; especially when considering the nature of the diagnosis and alternative treatment options