The cement in cement technique for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) has shown good results in selected cases. However, results of its use in the revision of hemiarthroplasty to THA has not been previously reported. Between May 1994 and May 2007 28 (20 Thompson's and 8 Exeter bipolar) hip hemiarthroplasties were revised to THA in 28 patients using the cement in cement technique. All had an Exeter stem inserted at the time of revision. Clinical and operative data were collected prospectively. Clinical evaluation was by the Charnley, Harris and Oxford. Hip scores and radiographs were analysed post-operatively and at latest follow up. The mean age at time of hemiarthroplasty revision was 80 (35 to 93) years. The reason for revision was acetabular erosion in 12 (43%), recurrent dislocation in eight (29%), aseptic stem loosening in four (14%), periprosthetic fracture in two (7%) and infection in a further two (7%) patients. No patient has been lost to follow up. Three patients died within three months of surgery. The mean follow up of the remainder was 50 (16 to 119) months. Survivorship with revision of the femoral stem for aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 100%. Three cases (11%) have since undergone further revision, one for recurrent dislocation, one for infection, and one for periprosthetic fracture. The cement in cement technique can be successfully applied to revision of hip hemiarthroplasty to THA. It has a number of advantages in this elderly population including minimising bone loss, blood loss and operative time

Introduction. While fixation on the acetabular side in resurfacing implants has been uncemented, the femoral component is usually cemented. The most common causes for early revision in hip resurfacing are femoral head and or neck fractures and aseptic loosening of the femoral component. Later failures appear to be more related to adverse soft-tissue reactions due to metal wear. Little is known about the effect of cementing techniques on the clinical outcome in hip resurfacing, since retrieval analysis of failed hip resurfacing show large variations. Two cementing techniques have dominated. The indirect low viscosity (LV) technique as for the Birmingham Hip resurfacing (BHR) system and the direct high viscosity (HV) technique as for the Articular Surface replacement (ASR) system. The ASR was withdrawn from the market in 2010 due to inferior short and midterm clinical outcome. This study presents an in vitro experiment on the cement mantle parameters and penetration into ASR resurfaced femoral heads comparing both techniques. Methods. Five sets of paried frozen cadavar femura (3 male, 2 female) were used in the study. The study was approved by ethics committee. Plastic ASR replicas (DePuy, Leeds, UK), femoral head size 47Ø were used. The LV technique was used for the right femora (Group A, fig. 1 and 3) while the HV technigue was used for the left femora (Group B. Fig 2 and 4). The speciments were cut into quadrants. An initiial visual, qualitative evaluation was followed by CT analysis of cement mantle thickness and cement penetration into bone. Results. No significant differences were seen between the four quadrants within each group. The LV technigue resulted in greater cement penetration and increased cement mantle under the top proximally. The HV technique showed less penetration and lower cement mantle. See figures 1–4. Discussion. The aim was to analyze the effect of the cementing techniques used in hip resurfacing practice. The ASR implant was chosen to improve understanding of whether the implant may have been sensitive to cementing techniques and whether an analysis of cementing with the recommended HV technique may assist in explaning the high incidence of short-term ASR revisions due to fractures. Findings for the HV technigue would indicate a superior technique according to consensus in conventional arthropalsty However, this contradicts clinical evidence on resurfacing, where LV cementation has been shown tho be superior. The superficial intergration in the HV technigue may result in only a superficial integration and subsequently suboptimal fixation to bone. To view tables/figures, please contact authors directly

Purpose. Glenoid component loosening is a common reason for failed total shoulder arthroplasty. Multiple factors have been suggested as causes for component loosening that may be related to cement technique. The purpose of the study was to compare the load transfer across a polyethylene glenoid bone construct with two different cementing techniques. Method. Eight cadaveric specimens underwent polyethylene glenoid component implantation. Four had cement around the pegs only (CPEG) and four had cement across the entire back (CBACK) of the implant including around the pegs. Step loading was performed with a pneumatic actuator and a non-conforming humeral head construct capable of applying loads at various angles. Strain gauges were placed at the superior and inferior poles of the glenoid and position trackers were applied to the superior and inferior aspects polyethylene component. Micro CT data were obtained before and after the loading protocol. Results. During compressive loading, greater tension was recorded with the CBACK technique than with the CPEG technique. Compression was recorded superiorly when load was applied at 30 degrees while tension was recorded inferiorly. Greater displacement occurred with the CPEG group. Failure as defined on micro CT occurred more consistently with the CBACK technique than with the CPEG technique. Conclusion. Tension measurements and upward deflection of the polyethylene with compressive loading at lower angles was unexpected. Early failure of fully cemented glenoids may be due to the fragility of the cement mantle around the periphery of the implant. Tension at the bone cement interface and early cement fracture are unfavorable and this may be a mechanism of implant loosening

Background. Cement implantation syndrome characterized by hypotension, hypoxemia, cardiac arrhythmia or arrest has been reported in the literature. The purpose of the present study was to monitor blood pressure soon after cementing. Methods. The present study includes 178 cases 204 joints of primary THA with an average age at operation of 64.5 years old (ranging 35 to 89). Under general anesthesia, both components were cemented using antero-lateral approach. Systolic arterial blood pressure during cementing acetabular and femoral components was monitored until 5 minutes with 1 minute interval. The maximum regulation ratio (MRR) was calculated as (maximum change blood pressure – blood pressure before cement insertion) divided by blood pressure before cement insertion. Results. No major complications such as cardiac arrest were observed. In most of the cases, blood pressure increased until 4 minutes for the acetabular side and 2 minutes for the femoral side, and then returned to the blood pressure before cement insertion gradually. In the acetabular side, average MRR was 11.2% (SD, 15.9; range, −26 to 80). Ｉn the femoral side, MRR was 6.4% (SD, 14.9; range, −31 to 65). There was statistical correlation between categories of MRR in the acetabular side and age at operation, the status of bleeding control of the acetabular side. When the bleeding control was judged as complete, blood pressure showed less tendency to decrease. When the bleeding control was judged as good, blood pressure showed more tendency to decrease. Conclusion. In the present study, major hypotension was not observed. Using third generation and IBBC cementing technique, when the bleeding control was judged as complete in the acetabular side, blood pressure showed less tendency to decrease

INTRODUCTION. we have previously reported that bone preparation is quite precise and accurate relative to a preoperative plan when using a robotic arm assisted technique for UKA. However, in that same study, we found a large variation between intended and final tibial implant position, presumably occuring during cement curing. In this study, we reviewed a subsequent cohort of patients in which the tibial and femoral components were cemented individually with ongoing evaluation of tibial component position during cement curing. METHODS AND MATERIALS. Group 1 comprised the simultaneous cementing techniquegroup of patients, previously reported on, although their x-rays were re-analyzed. Group 2 consisted of the individual cementing technique cohort. All implants were identical, specifically a flat, inlay all-polyethylene tibial component. Postoperative x-rays from each cohort of patients were evaluated using image analysis software. Statistical evaluation was performed. RESULTS. In Group 1, average bone preparation was 5.13 + 2.70 degrees of varus and 7.40 + 2.59 degrees of posterior slope. Final implant position was 3.56 + 1.93 degrees of varus and 5.19 + 3.37 degrees of slope. The variance from intended position was 2.31 + 1.74 degrees of varus and 3.80 + 2.90 degrees of slope. For Group 2, average bone preparation was 5.26 + 3.70 degrees of varus and 5.49+ 2.39 degrees of posterior slope. Final implant position was 6.58 + 3.40 degrees of varus and 6.11 + 2.39 degrees of slope. The variance from intended position was 1.82 + 1.42 degrees of varus and 1.39 + 1.48 degrees of slope. ANOVA revealed no differences between groups regarding bone prep in the coronal plane, final implant slope, or variation from intended coronal position. However, bone prep in the sagittal plane showed statistically significant more slope for Group 1 (p = 0.03), increased slope in Group 2 (p=0.004), and greater variation from intended sagital position for Group 1. CONCLUSIONS. Independent cementing of implants showed decreased variation in final tibial component position. However, some implants showed up to 6 degrees of malposition from the intended position. We believe this to be a shortcoming of the inlay style of tibial component for UKA, which even cannot be overcome with the precision and accuracy of a robotic arm assistant

Revision of the femoral component during revision hip arthroplasty may pose significant technical challenges, most notably femoral fracture and bone perforation. The in-cementing technique allows use of the original bone-cement interface which has been proven to be biomechanically stronger than recementing after complete removal of the original cement mantle.

This study reviews a series of 54 consecutive revision hip arthroplasty procedures carried out by the senior author using the in-cementing technique from November 1999 to March 2003. Patients were followed up clinically and radiologically with serial outpatient reviews and their functional outcome was assessed using the Harris hip scoring system, the Oxford hip scoring system and the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity profile. Their physical and mental well-being was also assessed using the SF-36 self-questionnaire.

Fifty-four procedures were performed on 51 patients. There were 31 males and 20 females. The average age was 70.3+/-8.1 years (range: 45-83 years). The average time to revision from the original procedure was 132.8+/-59.0 months (range: 26-286 months). The average length of follow-up was 29.2+/-13.4 months (range: 6-51 months) post revision arthroplasty. Two patients suffered dislocations, one of which was recurrent and was revised with a Girdlestone's procedure. No patient displayed any evidence of radiographical loosening. The average Harris hip score of the study group was 85.2+/-11.6 (range: 51.9-98.5). The average Oxford hip score recorded was 19.6+/-7.7 (range: 12-41) and the average UCLA activity profile score was 5.9+/-1.6 (range: 3-8). The SF-36 questionnaire had an average value of 78.0+/-18.3 (range: 31.6-100).

In conclusion, the results of this study show excellent clinical and radiological results of the in-cementing technique with high patient satisfaction in terms of functional outcome. This technique merits consideration where possible in revision hip arthroplasty.

The use of endoprosthesis implants is frequent for tumours involving the proximal third of the femur and not amenable to primary arthroplasty or internal fixation. In this population, these implants are preferentially cemented given poor bone quality associated with systemic diseases and treatments. Loosening is a common complication of these implants that have been linked to poor bone quality, type of implants and importantly cementing technique. Thus, these techniques vary between different surgeons and based mainly on previous experience. One of the most successful cementing techniques in the arthroplasty literature is the French paradox. This technique involves removing the cancellous bone of the proximal femoral metaphysis and selects the largest stem to tightly fit the created cavity delineated by cortical bone. Cementing the implant results in a very thin cement layer that fills the inconsistent gaps between the metal and the bone. To our knowledge, no previous report exists in the literature assessing loosening in proximal femur replacement using the French paradox cementing technique. In this study, we sought to examine (1) rates of loosening in proximal femur replacement, and (2) the oncological outcomes including tumour recurrence and implant related complications. A retrospective study of 42 patients underwent proximal femur replacement between 1990 and 2018 at our institution. Of these, 30 patients met our inclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers have evaluated the preoperative and the most recent postoperative radiographs using the International Society of Limb Salvage (ISOLS) radiographic scoring system and Gruen classification for femoral stem loosening. Additionally, the acetabulum was evaluated for erosion according to the criteria of Baker et al. The mean age of this cohort was 60.5 (19–80), with 60% being males. The primary origin was metastatic in 17 (56.7%) patients, bone sarcoma in 10 (33.3%) patients and soft tissue sarcoma in 3 (10%) patients. Pathological fractures were present in 11 (36.7%) patients. Seven (23.3%) patients had prior intramedullary nailing. Preoperative radiotherapy was used in 8 (26.7%) and postoperative radiotherapy in 17 (56.7%) patients. The mean clinical follow-up was 25.2±26.3 months and the mean radiographical follow-up was 24.8±26 months. The mean ISOLS score for both reviewers was found to be 89±6.5% and 86.5±6.1%, respectively. Additionally, the first reviewer found two patients to be possibly loos (6.7%) compared to one (3.3%) patient for the second reviewer. No components scored as probably or definitely loose and non-required revision for either loosening or metal failure. Furthermore, both reviewers showed no acetabular erosion in 25 (83.3%) and 24 (80%) patients, respectively. On the other hand, the overall rate of complications was 36.6% with 11 complications reported in 30 patients. Local recurrence occurred in five (16.6%) patients. Prosthetic Dislocation was the most frequent complications with eight dislocations in four patients. Despite complications, our results showed no radiographic evidence of stem loosening. Cementing proximal femur prosthesis with a tight canal fit and with a thin cement mantle appears to be a viable option at short and medium term

Introduction. We have investigated middle-term clinical results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) cemented socket with improved technique using hydroxyapatite (HA) granules. IBBC (interfacial bioactive bone cement method, Oonishi) (1) is an excellent technique for augmenting cement-bone fixation in the long term. However, the technique is difficult and there are concerns over some points, such as bleeding control, disturbance of cement intrusion to anchoring holes by granules, difficulty of the uniform granular dispersion to the acetabular bone. To improve the original technique, we have modified IBBC (M-IBBC), and investigated the middle-term clinical results and radiographic changes. Materials and Methods. K-MAX HS-3 THA (Kyocera, Japan), with tapered cemented stem with small collar and all polyethylene cemented socket, was used for THA implants (Fig.1). Basically the third generation cementing technique was used for THA using bone cement. The socket fixation was performed with bone cement (Endurance, DePuy) and HA granules (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2, Boneceram P; G-2, 0.3–0.6mm in size, Olympus, Japan) (Fig.2). In original IBBC technique, HA granules were dispersed on reamed acetabulum before cementing. In M-IBBC technique, HA granules were attached to bone cement on plastic plate, then inserted to reamed acetabulum and pressurized (Fig.3). 112 hip joints (95 cases) were operated between June 2010 and March 2014, and followed. The average follow-up period was 6.5 years, and average age at operation was 66.5 years. The clinical results were evaluated by Japan Orthopaedic Association Hip Score (JOA score), and X-p findings were evaluated using antero-posterior radiographs. The locations of radiolucent lines were identified according to the zones described by Delee and Charnley for acetabular components, and Zone 1 was divided into two parts, outer Zone 1a and inner Zone 1b. Results and Discussion. Revision was not performed. JOA score improved from 47 to 88. Socket and stem loosening was not observed. X-p findings of sockets demonstrated radiolucent line in Zone 1a/1b/2/3 in 0.9/0/0/0% immediately after the operation, 6.3/1.8/0/0.9% at 2 years postoperatively. After 2 years there was no progressive change, however, improvement of radiolucent line in Zone 1a was observed in two cases after 3 years postoperatively. Accordingly, at 5 years radiolucent line in Zone 1a/1b was observed in 4.4/1.8%. Oonish has reported excellent clinical results of THA with IBBC (1). To easily perform IBBC, we have modified the technique, improving the problems of IBBC. In this study, radiolucent line was observed at the margin of the socket in a small number of cases, and there was no progressive change. In addition, improvement of radiolucent line was observed in M-IBBC in this study, which was not observed in conventional cementing technique. Conclusions. It is demonstrated that M-IBBC provides stable socket cement fixation for THA. The interesting finding in M-IBBC cases was the improvement of radiolucent line, suggesting osteoconductive property of hydroxyapatite granules at the interface after the operations. The promising long-term clinical results of M-IBBC method, were expected. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to compare using a novel cementing technique with hydroxyapatite granules at bone-cement interface with using the 3. rd. cementing technique on the acetabular component. Patients and Methods. Between 2005 and 2007, we performed 54 primary cemented THAs using the 3. rd. generation cementing technique with hydroxyapatite granules at bone-cement interface (Group A: 21 hips) or without them (Group B: 33 hips) in 49 patients with dysplastic hip (6 males, 43 female; mean age at operation, 67 years; age range, 48–84 years). Mean follow up was 5.3 years (range, 2.3–7.1 years), with none of the patients lost to follow up. According to Crowe's classification, subluxation was Group I in 31 hips, group II in 11 hips, group III in 8 hips, and group IV in 4 hips. We used Exeter flanged cup, Exeter stem with a 22-mm diameter metal head (Stryker, Benoist Girard, France) and Simplex-P bone cement (Stryker, Limerick, Ireland) in all hips. A posterolateral approach was performed for all patients. Bone graft was performed 25 hips (block bone graft: 11 hips; impaction bone grafting with a metal mesh: 13 hips) from autogeneic femoral head. Our 3. rd. cementing technique is to make multiple 6-mm anchor holes, to clean the the host acetabular bed with pulse lavage, to dry it with hydrogen peroxide and to use Exeter balloon pressurizer and Exeter flanged cup. Results. The outcomes showed no aseptic loosening and radiological loosening at final follow up. Radiolucent line around the acetabular component was present 14% in Group A and 42% in Group B at 4 years after operation. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis of appearance of a radioluent line around the acetabuler component as the end point was 85.7% on group A was significant higher than 57.6% on group B at 4 years. Conclusion. Radiolucent line around cemented acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty using the 3. rd. cementing technique with hydroxyapatite granules at bone-cement interface was significant higher survivorship than them of the 3. rd. cementing technique at 4 years after operation. We suggest that improved novel cementing technique will lead to greater long-term success outcomes of the acetabular component

Fixation of cemented femoral stems is reproducible and provides excellent early recovery of hip function in patients 60–80 years old. The durability of fixation has been evaluated up to 20 years with 90% survivorship. The mode of failure of fixation of cemented total hip arthroplasty is multi-factorial; however, good cementing techniques and reduction of polyethylene wear have been shown to reduce its incidence. The importance of surface roughness for durability of fixation is controversial. This presentation will describe my personal experience with the cemented femoral stem over 30 years with 3 designs and surface roughness (RA) ranging from 30 to 150 microinches. Results. Since 1978, three series of cemented THA have been prospectively followed using periodic clinical and radiographic evaluations. All procedures were performed by the author using the posterior approach. Excellent results and Kaplan-Meier survivorship ranges from 90% to 99.5% in the best case scenario were noted at 10 to 20 year follow-up. Conclusion. With a properly-designed femoral stem, good cement technique, proper cement mantle, and surface roughness of 30 to 40 microinches, the cemented femoral stem provides a durable hip replacement in patients 60 to 80 years old with up to 95% survivorship at 10 to 20 year follow-up

The number of cemented femoral stems implanted in the United States continues to slowly decrease over time. Approximately 10% of all femoral components implanted today are cemented, and the majority are in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. The European experience is quite different. In the UK, cemented femoral stems account for approximately 50% of all implants, while in the Swedish registry, cemented stems still account for the majority of implanted femoral components. Recent data demonstrating some limitations of uncemented fixation in the elderly for primary THA, may suggest that a cemented femoral component may be an attractive alternative in such a group. Two general philosophies exist with regards to the cemented femoral stem: Taper slip and Composite Beam. There are flagship implants representing both philosophies and select designs have shown excellent results past 30 years. A good femoral component design and cementing technique, however, is crucial for long-term clinical success. The author's personal preference is that of a “taper slip” design. The cemented Exeter stem has shown excellent results past 30 years with rare cases of loosening. The characteristic behavior of such a stem is to allow slight subsidence of the stem within the cement mantle through the process of cement creep. One or two millimeters of subsidence in the long-term have been observed with no detrimental clinical consequences. There have been ample results in the literature showing the excellent results at mid- and long-term in all patient groups. The author's current indication for a cemented stem include the elderly with no clear and definitive cutoff for age, most likely in females, THA for femoral neck fracture, small femoral canals such as those patients with DDH, and occasionally in patients with history of previous hip infection. Modern and impeccable cement technique is paramount for durable cemented fixation. It is important to remember that the goal is interdigitation of the cement with cancellous bone, so preparing the femur should not remove cancellous bone. Modern technique includes distal plugging of the femoral canal, pulsatile lavage, drying of the femoral canal with epinephrine or hydrogen peroxide, retrograde fill of the femoral canal with cement with appropriate suction and pressurization of the femoral cement into the canal prior to implantation of the femoral component. The dreaded “cement implantation syndrome” leading to sudden death can be avoided by appropriate fluid resuscitation prior to implanting the femoral component. This is an extremely rare occurrence today with reported mortality for the Exeter stem of 1 in 10,000. A cemented femoral component has been shown to be clinically successful at long term. Unfortunately, the art of cementing a femoral component has been lost and is rarely performed in the US. The number of cemented stems, unfortunately, may continue to go down as it is uncommonly taught in residency and fellowship, however, it might find a resurgence as the limits of uncemented fixation in the elderly are encountered. National joint registers support the use of cemented femoral components, and actually demonstrate higher survivorship at short term when compared to all other uncemented femoral components. A cemented femoral component should be in the hip surgeons armamentarium when treating patients undergoing primary and revision THA

In the 1960's Sir John Charnley introduced to clinical practice his low friction arthroplasty with a highly polished cemented femoral stem. The satisfactory long term results of this and other cemented stems support the use of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) for fixation. The constituents of PMMA remain virtually unchanged since the 1960s. However, in the last three decades, advances in the understanding of cement fixation, mixing techniques, application, pressurization, stem materials and design provided further improvements to the clinical results. The beneficial changes in cementing technique include femoral preparation to diminish interface bleeding, pulsatile lavage, reduced cement porosity by vacuum mixing, the use of a cement restrictor, pre-heating of the stem and polymer, retrograde canal filling and pressurization with a cement gun, stem centralization and stem geometries that increase the intramedullary pressure and penetration of PMMA into the cancellous structure of bone. Some other changes in cementing technique proved to be detrimental and were abandoned, such as the use of Boneloc cement that polymerised at a low temperature, and roughening and pre-coating of the stem surface. In the last two decades there has been a tendency towards an increased use of cementless femoral fixation for primary hip arthroplasty. The shift in the type of fixation followed the consistent, durable fixation obtained with uncemented acetabular cups, ease of implantation and the poor results of cemented femoral fixation of rough and pre-coated stems. Unlike cementless femoral fixation, modern cemented femoral fixation has numerous advantages: it is versatile, durable and can be used regardless of the diagnosis, proximal femoral geometry, natural neck version, and bone quality. It can be used in combination with antibiotics in patients with a history or predisposition for infection. Intra-operative femoral fractures are rare. However, the risk may be increased in collarless polished tapered stems. Post-operative thigh pain is extremely rare. Survivorship has not been surpassed by uncemented femoral fixation and it continues to be my preferred form of fixation. However, heavy, young, male patients may exhibit a slightly higher aseptic loosening rate

Introduction. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty has gained popularity as an alternative for total hip arthroplasty. Usually, cemented fixation is used for the femoral component. However, each type of resurfacing design has its own recommended cementing technique. In a recent investigation the effect of various cementing techniques on cement mantle properties was studied. This study showed distinct differences in cement mantle volume, filling index and morphology. In this study, we investigated the effect of these cement mantle variations on the heat generation during polymerization, and its consequences in terms of thermal bone necrosis. Materials and methods. Two FEA models of resurfacing reconstructions were created based on CT-data of in vitroimplantations (Fig 1). The two models had distinct differences with respect to the amount of cement that was used for fixation. The first model was based on an implantation with low-viscosity cement, with anchoring holes drilled in the bone, and suction applied to maximize cement penetration. The second model was based on an implantation with medium viscosity cement smeared onto the bone, with no holes and no suction, leading to a thin cement layer. Thermal analyses were performed of the polymerization process, simulating three different types of bone cement: Simplex P (Stryker), CMW3 (DePuy J&J) and Osteobond (Zimmer), with distinct differences in polymerization characteristics. The polymerization kinematics were based on data reported previously. During the polymerization simulations the cement and bone temperature were monitored. Based on the local temperature and time of exposure, the occurrence of thermal bone necrosis was predicted. The total volume of necrotic bone was calculated for each case. Results and discussion. The simulations showed distinct differences between the temperature distributions in the various models. The highest temperature was found in the CMW3 model with a large cement volume (Fig. 2, Table 1), while the Osteobond model with a thin cement mantle produced the lowest temperature rise in the bone. The necrotic bone volume was highest in the CMW3 model with a large cement mantle, while the lowest volume was found in the model with a thin cement layer (Table 1). Assuming that the bone that is being penetrated by cement also is affected by thermal and toxic necrosis, more than 70% of the bone inside the resurfacing implant may become necrotic. In contrast, when using a less invasive cementing technique, thermal necrosis can be reduced to approximately 20% of the volume inside the resurfacing implant. A large zone of necrotic bone at the cement-bone interface may have serious implications for the strength and stability of resurfacing arthroplasty. Conclusion. We conclude that the cementing technique and type of cement used for fixation of a resurfacing implant can dramatically affect the viability of the femoral bone, and therefore the survival of the reconstruction. Thermal necrosis may be reduced by minimizing cement penetration, although this may also have consequences for the mechanical stability

Background. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) continues to rise worldwide, accompanied by the increasing abandonment of cemented femoral fixation. Cementless fixation is known to contribute to higher rates of post-operative complications and reoperations. New data is available from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) regarding total costs of care from the Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) and Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) initiatives. Questions/purposes. How does femoral fixation affect (1) 90-day costs; (2) readmission rates; (3) re-operation rates; (4) length of stay (LOS); and (5) discharge disposition for Medicare patients undergoing elective or non-elective THA?. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of 1671 primary THA cases in Medicare patients across nine hospitals in an academic healthcare network. CMS data was used to evaluate lump costs including the surgical admission and 30-day or 90-day post-operative episodes. Costs were then correlated with clinical outcome measures from review of our electronic medical record. Demographic differences were present between the cemented and cementless cohorts. Statistical analyses were performed including multiple regression models adjusted for the baseline cohort differences. Results. After controlling for confounding variables, cemented patients were significantly more likely to be discharged home compared to cementless patients. Cemented femoral fixation also demonstrated a trend towards lower costs, fewer readmissions and shorter LOS. All of the reoperations within the early postoperative period occurred in cementless patients. Conclusion. In a large Medicare population, cemented femoral fixation outperformed cementless fixation with respect to discharge disposition and also trended toward superiority with regards to LOS, readmission, cost of care, and reoperations. Cemented femoral fixation remains relevant and useful despite the rising popularity of cementless fixation. Orthopaedic surgeons in training should become competent with femoral cementation technique

The number of cemented femoral stems implanted in the United States continues to slowly decrease over time. Approximately 10% of all femoral components implanted today are cemented, and the majority are in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. The European experience is quite different, in the UK, cemented femoral stems account for approximately 50% of all implants, while in the Swedish registry, cemented stems still account for the majority of implanted femoral components. Recent data demonstrating some limitations of uncemented fixation in the elderly for primary THA, may suggest that a cemented femoral component may be an attractive alternative in such a group. Two general philosophies exist with regards to the cemented femoral stem: Taper slip and Composite Beam. There are flagship implants representing both philosophies and select designs have shown excellent results past 30 years. A good femoral component design and cementing technique, however, is crucial for long-term clinical success. The authors' personal preference is that of a “taper slip” design. The cemented Exeter stem has shown excellent results past 30 years with rare cases of loosening. The characteristic behavior of such a stem is to allow slight subsidence of the stem within the cement mantle through the process of cement creep. One or two millimeters of subsidence in the long-term have been observed with no detrimental clinical consequences. There have been ample results in the literature showing the excellent results at mid- and long-term in all patient groups. The authors' current indications for a cemented stem include the elderly with no clear and definitive cutoff for age, most likely in females, THA for femoral neck fracture, small femoral canals such as those patients with DDH, and occasionally in patients with history of previous hip infection. Modern and impeccable cement technique is paramount for durable cemented fixation. It is important to remember that the goal is interdigitation of the cement with cancellous bone, so preparing the femur should not remove cancellous bone. Modern technique includes distal plugging of the femoral canal, pulsatile lavage, drying of the femoral canal with epinephrine or hydrogen peroxide, retrograde fill of the femoral canal with cement with appropriate suction and pressurization of the femoral cement into the canal prior to implantation of the femoral component. The dreaded “cement implantation syndrome” leading to sudden death can be avoided by appropriate fluid resuscitation prior to implanting the femoral component. This is a extremely rare occurrence today with reported mortality for the Exeter stem of 1 in 10,000. A cemented femoral component has been shown to be clinically successful at long term. Unfortunately, the art of cementing a femoral component has been lost and is rarely performed in the US. The number of cemented stems unfortunately may continue to go down as it is uncommonly taught in residency and fellowship, however it might find a resurgence as the limits of uncemented fixation in the elderly are encountered. National joint registers support the use of cemented femoral components, and actually demonstrate higher survivorship at short term when compared to all other uncemented femoral components. A cemented femoral component should be in the hip surgeons' armamentarium when treating patients undergoing primary and revision THA

Introduction. Cement pressurisation in the distal humerus is technically difficult due to the anatomy of the humeral intramedullary (IM) cavity. Conventional cement restrictors often migrate proximally or leak, reducing the effect of pressurisation during implantation. Theoretically with a better cement bone interdigitation, the longevity of the elbow replacement can be improved. The aim of this cadaveric study was to evaluate the usefulness of a novel technique for cementation. Method. Eight paired fresh frozen cadaveric elbows were randomly allocated to conventional cementing techniques or cementing using a paediatric foley catheter as a temporary restrictor. The traditional cementing technique consisted of canal preparation using irrigation, brushing and drying prior to cementation, with no use of a cement restrictor. The new technique involved same canal preparation but prior to cementation a size 8 foley catheter was introduced and the balloon inflated to act as a temporary cement restrictor. The humeri were cut into 10mm sections. Each slice was photographed and radiographed. This dual imaging technique was used to establish the best methodology for evaluation of cement penetration. Cement penetration was calculated as a ratio of the area of intra-medullary cavity occupied by the cement. Results. There was no significant difference between the photographic and radiographic method of measuring cement penetration. Cement penetration was significantly better in the foley catheter group (P = 0.002-0.037). The maximum penetration was observed in the most distal 2-5cm. Conclusion. The foley catheter technique consistently and significantly achieved a better cement interdigitation into the cancellous bone, without leaving a void in the cement. This study has demonstrated a new cementing technique for elbow arthroplasty, utilising a paediatric foley catheter as a temporary humeral intra-medullary plug, increasing cement pressurisation and restricting proximal cement migration. Future studies using this methodology will not require supplementation of photographs with radiographic analysis

Fixation of cemented femoral stems is reproducible and provides excellent early recovery of hip function in patients 60–80 years old. The durability of fixation has been evaluated up to 20 years with 90% survivorship. The mode of failure of fixation of cemented total hip arthroplasty is multi-factorial; however, good cementing techniques and reduction of polyethylene wear have been shown to reduce its incidence. The importance of surface roughness for durability of fixation is controversial. This presentation will describe my personal experience with the cemented femoral stem over 30 years with 3 designs and surface roughness (RA) ranging from 30–150 microinches. RESULTS. Since 1978, three series of cemented THA have been prospectively followed using periodic clinical and radiographic evaluations. All procedures were performed by the author using the posterior approach. Excellent results and Kaplan-Meier survivorship ranged from 90–99.5% in the best case scenario were noted at 10–20-year follow-up. CONCLUSION. With a properly-designed femoral stem, good cement technique, proper cement mantle, and surface roughness of 30–40 microinches, the cemented femoral stem provides a durable hip replacement in patients 60–80 years old with up to 95% survivorship at 10–20-year follow-up

Introduction. The bone defect reconstruction is the first step of successful primary or revision TKA in case of large bone defect. If the defect is not reconstructed adequately, we can neither preserve knee joint function nor guarantee long survival of the implant. Allogeneic bone graft is known to be the treatment of choice in large defect. However the surgical technique is demanding and incorporation failure is constant issue of the allogeneic bone graft. We propose new bone defect reconstruction technique using multiple screws and cement. Material and method. From April 2012 to April 2014, 12 patients with large defect which could not be reconstructed with metal augment were involved in this study. The bone defect type was 10 cases of 2A and 2 cases of 2B according to AORI (Anderson Orthopedic Research Institute) classification. The defect was reconstructed with multiple screws and cementing technique by single surgeon (WS Cho). Average follow-up period was 15 months. (24 ∼ 1 month). Result. We analyzed 6 patients whose follow-up periods were more than 12 months. Average ROM was 107' and clinical scores were 86 by HSS, 93 by KS and 11 by WOMAC respectively. No complications such as infection and loosening were developed. Mean surgical time was 1 hour and 57 minutes. Conclusion. In short term follow-up, cementing technique using multiple screws can be a solution for large bone defect reconstruction

The infected TKA is one of the most challenging complications of knee surgery, but spacers can make them easier to treat. An articulating spacer allows weight bearing and range of motion of the knee during rehabilitation. This spacer is made using antibiotic-impregnated bone cement applied to the tibial and femoral implants. For our purpose, 4.8g powdered tobramycin is mixed with 2gm vancomycin and one batch of antibiotic. Cement is applied early to the components, but applied late to the femur, tibia, and patella to allow molding to the defects and bone without solid adherence to bone. Patients have tailored intravenous antibiotic therapy for 6 weeks for treatment of various gram-positive and gram-negative organisms. At 10–12 weeks patients are revised to a cemented revision total knee arthroplasty using standard cementing techniques. From our experience, range of motion before reimplantation was 5 – 90 degrees. Follow-up averaged 73 months for fifty patients with 90% good to excellent results; 10% had a recurrence of infections. Use of an articulating spacer achieves soft tissue compliance, allows for ease of re-operation, reduced postoperative pain, improved function, and eradicates infection equal to standards reported in the literature

Purpose. We have compared the short-term clinical results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using PMMA bone cement and hydroxyapatite (HA) granules (interfacial bioactive bone cement method; IBBC) with the results of conventional method using PMMA bone cement. Materials and Methods. K-MAX HS-3 THA (JMM, Japan), with cemented titanium alloy stem and all polyethylene cemented socket, was used for THA implants. The third generation cement technique was used for the conventional THA (Group C) using bone cement (Endurance, DePuy). In the IBBC group (Group BC), the socket fixation was performed by the third generation cement technique with HA granules (Boneceram P; G-2, Olympus, Japan) according to the Ohnishi's method. In both groups, the stems were fixed by conventional cementing technique using cement gun. 76 hip joins (69 cases) were operated between April 2005 and August 2007, and followed. The group C (22 hips, 19 cases, average follow-up; 5.6 years, average age at operation; 64 years) and the group BC (54 hips, 50 cases, 5.4 years, 65 years) were investigated. Results. One revision was performed in BC group due to late infection. Japanese orthopaedic association (JOA) score improved from 42/48 to 85/87 in Group C/BC. Socket loosening was not observed radiographically. X-p findings of Group C/BC demonstrated radiolucent line in the outer part of Zone 1 in 18%/16% immediately after operation, 24%/23% at 2 years postoperatively. After 2 years there was no change in Group C, however, improvement of radiolucent line (gap filling) with bone remodeling was observed in two cases in Group BC at 3 years postoperatively. Conclusions. The short-term clinical results of Group BC using IBBC method and Group C using conventional method were equally satisfactory. The interesting finding in Group BC case was the improvement of radiolucent line (gap filling), suggesting osteoconductive property of hydroxyapatite granules at the interface after the operations. The promising clinical results of IBBC method in the long term were expected