Aims. We aimed to compare reoperations following distal radial fractures (DRFs) managed with early fixation versus delayed fixation following initial closed reduction (CR). Methods. We used administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, to identify DRF patients aged 18 years or older from 2003 to 2016. We used procedural and fee codes within 30 days to determine which patients underwent early fixation (≤ seven days) or delayed fixation following CR. We grouped patients in the delayed group by their time to definitive fixation (eight to 14 days, 15 to 21 days, and 22 to 30 days). We used intervention and diagnostic codes to identify reoperations within two years. We used multivariable regression to compare the association between early versus delayed fixation and reoperation for all patients and stratified by age (18 to 60 years and > 60 years). Results. We identified 14,960 DRF patients, 8,339 (55.7%) of whom underwent early surgical fixation (mean 2.9 days (SD 1.8)). In contrast, 4,042 patients (27.0%) underwent delayed fixation between eight and 14 days (mean 10.2 days (SD 2.2)), 1,892 (12.7%) between 14 and 21 days (mean 17.5 days (SD 1.9)) and 687 (4.6%) > 21 days (mean 24.8 days (SD 2.4)) post-fracture. Patients who underwent delayed fixation > 21 days post-fracture had a higher odds of reoperation (odds ratio (OR) 1.33 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.79) vs early fixation). This worsened for patients aged > 60 years (OR 1.69 (95% CI 1.11 to 2.79)). We found no difference in the odds of reoperation for patients who underwent delayed fixation within eight to 14 or 15 to 21 days post-fracture (vs early fixation). Conclusion. These data suggest that DRF patients with fractures with unacceptable reduction following CR should be managed within three weeks to avoid detrimental outcomes. Prospective studies are required to confirm these findings. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(11):1257–1262

Aims. Abduction bracing is commonly used to treat developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) following closed reduction and spica casting, with little evidence to support or refute this practice. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of abduction bracing after closed reduction in improving acetabular index (AI) and reducing secondary surgery for residual hip dysplasia. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of patients treated with closed reduction for DDH at a single tertiary referral centre. Demographic data were obtained including severity of dislocation based on the International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) classification, age at reduction, and casting duration. Patients were prescribed no abduction bracing, part-time, or full-time wear post-reduction and casting. AI measurements were obtained immediately upon cast removal and from two- and four-year follow-up radiographs. Results. A total of 243 hips underwent closed reduction and 82% (199/243) were treated with abduction bracing. There was no difference between those treated with or without bracing with regard to sex, age at reduction, severity of dislocation, spica duration, or immediate post-casting AI (all p > 0.05). There was no difference in hips treated with or without abduction brace with regard to AI at two years post-reduction (32.4° (SD 5.3°) vs 30.9° (SD 4.6°), respectively; p = 0.099) or at four years post-reduction (26.4° (SD 5.2°) vs 25.4° (SD 5.1°), respectively; p = 0.231). Multivariate analysis revealed only IHDI grade predicted AI at two years post-reduction (p = 0.004). There was no difference in overall rate of secondary surgery for residual dysplasia between hips treated with or without bracing (32% vs 39%, respectively; p = 0.372). However, there was an increased risk of early secondary surgery (< two years post-reduction) in the non-braced group (11.4% vs 2.5%; p = 0.019). Conclusion. Abduction bracing following closed reduction for DDH treatment is not associated with decreased residual dysplasia at two or four years post-reduction but may reduce rates of early secondary surgery. A prospective study is indicated to provide more definitive recommendations. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(12):1327–1332

Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures seen in the emergency department. Closed reduction can provide definitive management when acceptable radiographic parameters are met. Repeated attempts of closed reduction are often performed to improve the alignment and avoid operative management. However, multiple reduction attempts may worsen dorsal comminution and lead to eventual loss of reduction, resulting in no demonstrable benefit. We hypothesize that compared to one closed reduction attempt, repeated closed reduction of extra-articular, dorsally angulated, displaced distal radius fractures has a low success rate in the prevention of operative fixation and improvement of radiographic parameters. Initial and post reduction radiographs for all distal radius fractures managed at Vancouver General Hospital between 2015 and 2018 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were based on the AO fracture classification and included types 23-A2.1, 23-A2.2 and 23-A3. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18, intra-articular involvement with more than two millimeters of displacement, volar or dorsal Barton fractures, fracture-dislocations, open fractures and volar angulation of the distal segment. Distal radius fractures that met study criteria and underwent two or more attempts of closed reduction were matched by age and gender with fractures that underwent one closed reduction. Radiographic parameters including radial height and inclination, ulnar variance and volar tilt were compared between groups. Sixty-eight distal radius fractures that met study criteria and underwent multiple closed reduction attempts were identified. A repeated closed reduction initially improved the radial height (p = 0.03) and volar tilt (p < 0.001). However, by six to eight weeks the improvement in radial height had been lost (p = 0.001). Comparison of radiographic parameters between the single reduction and multiple reduction groups revealed no difference in any of the radiographic parameters at one week of follow up. By six to eight weeks, the single reduction group had greater radial height (p = 0.01) ulnar variance (p = 0.05) and volar tilt (p = 0.02) compared to the multiple reduction group. With respect to definitive management, 38% of patients who underwent a repeated closed reduction subsequently received surgery, compared to 13% in the single reduction group (p = 0.001). Repeated closed reduction of extra-articular, dorsally angulated, displaced distal radius fractures did not improve alignment compared to a single closed reduction and was associated with increased frequency of surgical fixation. The benefit of repeating a closed reduction should be carefully considered when managing distal radius fractures of this nature

Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures seen in the emergency department. Closed reduction can provide definitive management when acceptable radiographic parameters are met. Repeated attempts of closed reduction are often performed to improve the alignment and avoid operative management. However, multiple reduction attempts may worsen dorsal comminution and lead to eventual loss of reduction, resulting in no demonstrable benefit. We hypothesize that compared to one closed reduction attempt, repeated closed reduction of extra-articular, dorsally angulated, displaced distal radius fractures has a low success rate in the prevention of operative fixation and improvement of radiographic parameters. Initial and post reduction radiographs for all distal radius fractures managed at Vancouver General Hospital between 2015 and 2018 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were based on the AO fracture classification and included types 23-A2.1, 23-A2.2 and 23-A3. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18, intra-articular involvement with more than two millimeters of displacement, volar or dorsal Barton fractures, fracture-dislocations, open fractures and volar angulation of the distal segment. Distal radius fractures that met study criteria and underwent two or more attempts of closed reduction were matched by age and gender with fractures that underwent one closed reduction. Radiographic parameters including radial height and inclination, ulnar variance and volar tilt were compared between groups. Sixty-eight distal radius fractures that met study criteria and underwent multiple closed reduction attempts were identified. A repeated closed reduction initially improved the radial height (p = 0.03) and volar tilt (p < 0.001). However, by six to eight weeks the improvement in radial height had been lost (p = 0.001). Comparison of radiographic parameters between the single reduction and multiple reduction groups revealed no difference in any of the radiographic parameters at one week of follow up. By six to eight weeks, the single reduction group had greater radial height (p = 0.01) ulnar variance (p = 0.05) and volar tilt (p = 0.02) compared to the multiple reduction group. With respect to definitive management, 38% of patients who underwent a repeated closed reduction subsequently received surgery, compared to 13% in the single reduction group (p = 0.001). Repeated closed reduction of extra-articular, dorsally angulated, displaced distal radius fractures did not improve alignment compared to a single closed reduction and was associated with increased frequency of surgical fixation. The benefit of repeating a closed reduction should be carefully considered when managing distal radius fractures of this nature

Aims. To determine the likelihood of achieving a successful closed reduction (CR) of a dislocated hip in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) after failed Pavlik harness treatment We report the rate of avascular necrosis (AVN) and the need for further surgical procedures. Methods. Data was obtained from the Northern Ireland DDH database. All children who underwent an attempted closed reduction between 2011 and 2016 were identified. Children with a dislocated hip that failed Pavlik harness treatment were included in the study. Successful closed reduction was defined as a hip that reduced in theatre and remained reduced. Most recent imaging was assessed for the presence of AVN using the Kalamchi and MacEwen classification. Results. There were 644 dislocated hips in 543 patients initially treated in Pavlik harness. In all, 67 hips failed Pavlik harness treatment and proceeded to arthrogram (CR) under general anaesthetic at an average age of 180 days. The number of hips that were deemed reduced in theatre was 46 of the 67 (69%). A total of 11 hips re-dislocated and underwent open reduction, giving a true successful CR rate of 52%. For the total cohort of 67 hips that went to theatre for arthrogram and attempted CR, five (7%) developed clinically significant AVN at an average follow-up of four years and one month, while none of the 35 hips whose reduction was truly successful developed clinically significant AVN. Conclusion. The likelihood of a successful closed reduction of a dislocated hip in the Northern Ireland population, which has failed Pavlik harness treatment, is 52% with a clinically significant AVN rate of 7%. As such, we continue to advocate closed reduction under general anaesthetic for the hip that has failed Pavlik harness. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(8):594–598

Aims. Eccentric reductions may become concentric through femoral head ‘docking’ (FHD) following closed reduction (CR) for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, changes regarding position and morphology through FHD are not well understood. We aimed to assess these changes using serial MRI. Methods. We reviewed 103 patients with DDH successfully treated by CR and spica casting in a single institution between January 2016 and December 2020. MRI was routinely performed immediately after CR and at the end of each cast. Using MRI, we described the labrum-acetabular cartilage complex (LACC) morphology, and measured the femoral head to triradiate cartilage distance (FTD) on the midcoronal section. A total of 13 hips with initial complete reduction (i.e. FTD < 1 mm) and ten hips with incomplete MRI follow-up were excluded. A total of 86 patients (92 hips) with a FTD > 1 mm were included in the analysis. Results. At the end of the first cast period, 73 hips (79.3%) had a FTD < 1 mm. Multiple regression analysis showed that FTD (p = 0.011) and immobilization duration (p = 0.028) were associated with complete reduction. At the end of the second cast period, all 92 hips achieved complete reduction. The LACC on initial MRI was inverted in 69 hips (75.0%), partly inverted in 16 hips (17.4%), and everted in seven hips (7.6%). The LACC became everted-congruent in 45 hips (48.9%) and 92 hips (100%) at the end of the first and second cast period, respectively. However, a residual inverted labrum was present in 50/85 hips (58.8%) with an initial inverted or partly inverted LACC. Conclusion. An eccentric reduction can become concentric after complete reduction and LACC remodelling following CR for DDH. Varying immobilization durations were required for achieving complete reduction. A residual inverted labrum was present in more than half of all hips after LACC remodelling. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):140–147

Glenohumeral dislocation is complicated with a greater tuberosity fracture in 16% of cases. Debate regarding the safety of closed reduction in the emergency department exists, with concerns over fracture propagation during the reduction manoeuvre. The study aim was to report the results of closed reduction, identify complications and define outcome for these injuries. 188 consecutive glenohumeral dislocations with a tuberosity fracture were identified from a prospective database from 2014–2017. 182 had an attempted closed reduction under appropriate sedation using standard techniques, five were manipulated in theatre due to contra-indications to sedation. Clinical, radiographic and patient reported outcomes, in the form of the QuickDASH and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), were collected. A closed reduction in the emergency department was successful in 162 (86%) patients. Two iatrogenic fractures of the proximal humerus occurred, one in the emergency department and one in theatre, representing a 1% risk. 35 (19%) of patients presented with a nerve lesion due to dislocation. Surgery was performed in 19 (10%) cases for persistent or early displacement (< 2 weeks) of the greater tuberosity fragment. Surgery resulted in QuickDASH and OSS scores comparable to those patients in whom the tuberosity healed spontaneously in an anatomical position (p=0.13). 18 patients developed adhesive capsulitis (10%). Glenohumeral dislocation with greater tuberosity fracture can be safely treated by closed reduction within the emergency department with a low risk of humeral neck fracture. Persistent or early displacement of the tuberosity fragment will occur in 10% of cases and is an indication for surgery

Purpose of the study. This study aims to evaluate the use of closed reduction of hips with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and medial open reduction of these hips as a subsection of closed reduced hips. Methods. The study was a retrospective analysis of treatment of 30 children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). These children were taken from a consecutive series of children treated over a period from June 2000 to 2011 with closed reduction by a single surgeon. The ages at the time of diagnosis were between 1 day and 13 months (mean 5.25 weeks). Included in this series are 7 patients treated with medial open reduction, all done with the Ludloff approach. Follow up of these patients was from 8 months to 12 years (mean 5 years). All patients needing secondary procedures were noted. The X- rays were evaluated for percentage acetabulum cover in patients over the age of 8 and improvement of the acetabular index in all these patients. Results. 4 children needed secondary procedures. 1 child of the closed reduction group developed avascular necrosis of the femoral head that was treated with a Salter osteotomy and a further 2 needed secondary open reductions after redislocation following initial closed reduction. One child with bilateral open medial reductions had a Salter osteotomy 6 years after the initial treatment was done. 26 of the children had good outcomes with improvement of the acetabular angles, percentage acetabular cover and pain free independent ambulation. The average acetabular index improved from 37.5° to 23.3°. Conclusion. Closed reduction of DDH hips is a good treatment modality. Early treatment allows for acetabular and femoral development. There are minimal secondary procedures necessary after closed reduction, and open medial reduction does not increase the complication rate. NO DISCLOSURES

Aims. The goal of closed reduction (CR) in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is to achieve and maintain concentricity of the femoral head in the acetabulum. However, concentric reduction is not immediately attainable in all hips and it remains controversial to what degree a non-concentric reduction is acceptable. This prospective study is aimed at investigating the dynamic evolution of the hip joint space after CR in DDH using MRI. Methods. A consecutive series of patients with DDH who underwent CR since March 2014 were studied. Once the safety and stability were deemed adequate intraoperatively, reduction was accepted regardless of concentricity. Concentricity was defined when the superior joint space (SJS) and medial joint space (MJS) were both less than 2 mm, based on MRI. A total of 30 children, six boys and 24 girls, involving 35 hips, were recruited for the study. The mean age at CR was 13.7 months (3.5 to 27.6) and the mean follow-up was 49.5 months (approximately four years) (37 to 60). The joint space was evaluated along with the interval between the inverted and everted limbus. Results. Only three hips (8.6%) were fully concentric immediately after CR. During follow-up, 24 hips (68.6%) and 27 hips (77.1%) became concentric at six months and one year, respectively. Immediate SJS after CR decreased from 3.51 mm to 0.79 mm at six months follow-up (p = 0.001). SJS in the inverted group decreased from 3.75 mm to 0.97 mm at six months follow-up. SJS or MJS in the everted group were less than those in the inverted group at each time of follow-up (p = 0.008, p = 0.002). Conclusion. A stable, safe but non-concentric reduction achieved before the age of two years appears to improve over time with nearly 80% of hips becoming fully concentric by one year. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(5):618–626

Aims:. To assess the success rate of closed reduction after failing Pavlik harness for treatment of DDH. Methods:. It was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Patient's notes/computerised records were reviewed. Radiological investigations were also reviewed. Microsoft excel used for descriptive stats. Results:. From 1998 to 2011, 975 patients (1322 hips) were treated with Pavlik harness. Of these, 188 (20%) were male and 787 (80%) were female patients. The Pavlik Harness was successful in 92% patients and failed in 8% (102) patients. These 102 patients underwent closed reduction under general anaesthesia. Of these, the closed reduction was successful in 33 (20%) patients and failed in 69(68%) patients who then underwent open reduction. Conclusion:. The Success of closed reduction in patients with failed Pavlik Harness is low. Closed reduction may not overcome intrinsic and extrinsic obstructing factors responsible for failure of Pavlik Harness. Level of evidence: IV

Aims. There is no level I evidence dealing with the optimal period of immobilization for patients with a displaced distal radial fracture following closed reduction. A shorter period might lead to a better functional outcome due to less stiffness and pain. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this period could be safely reduced from six to four weeks. Methods. This multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) included adult patients with a displaced distal radial fracture, who were randomized to be treated with immobilization in a cast for four or six weeks following closed reduction. The primary outcome measure was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score after follow-up at one year. Secondary outcomes were the abbreviated version of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score after one year, the functional outcome at six weeks, 12 weeks, and six months, range of motion (ROM), the level of pain after removal of the cast, and complications. Results. A total of 100 patients (15 male, 85 female) were randomized, with 49 being treated with four weeks of immobilization in a cast. A total of 93 completed follow-up. The mean PRWE score after one year was 6.9 (SD 8.3) in the four-week group compared with 11.6 (SD 14.3) in the six-week group. However, this difference of -4.7 (95% confidence interval -9.29 to 0.14) was not clinically relevant as the minimal clinically important difference of 11.5 was not reached. There was no significant difference in the ROM, radiological outcome, level of pain, or complications. Conclusion. In adult patients with a displaced and adequately reduced distal radial fracture, immobilization in a cast for four weeks is safe, and the results are similar to those after a period of immobilization of six weeks. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(9):993–999

We reviewed 98 children (133 hips) with developmental dysplasia of the hip who underwent arthrography immediately after closed reduction by overhead traction. We followed the patients to skeletal maturity to investigate whether soft-tissue interposition influences acetabular development and avascular necrosis over the long term. The shape of the limbus and the thickness of the soft-tissue interposition at the acetabular floor, as shown on arthrograms at the time of reduction, were not directly related to the final radiological results or to the incidence of avascular necrosis. Even if marked soft-tissue interposition was found on the initial arthrogram, spontaneous disappearance was noted in 71% up to the age of five years. The final radiological results showed no difference between those in which the interposition disappeared and those with none at the time of closed reduction. However, the requirement for secondary surgery at the age of five years was significantly higher in those with more than 3.5 mm of soft-tissue interposition. In the no-disappearance group (group C) further operation was necessary in 100% and the results were significantly worse at maturity according to Severin’s classification. We suggest that the indications for open reduction should not be based solely on the arthrographic findings at the time of closed reduction

Aim: To determine the outcome and need for subsequent surgery in patients following successful closed reduction of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the financial implications of re-operation. Methods: Data was retrospectively obtained from radiographs and patient case notes for all dislocated primary hip replacements presenting to the University Hospital of Wales from January 2000 till November 2005. Records were analysed with a minimum of 1 year follow-up to determine the outcome and need for subsequent surgery following successful closed reduction of dislocation after primary THA. Factors studied include age at primary surgery, indications, components, approach, head size, duration since surgery and direction of dislocation. Results: Over the 6 year study period, 98 patients presented with 100 first time dislocated primary total hip replacements. All the dislocations underwent successful closed reduction. 62 (62%) hips re-dislocated more that once. At minimum follow up of 1 year, 7 patients had died and were excluded from the final study group. Of the remaining 93 hips, 46 patients have had no further surgery. 44 THA’s have undergone revision procedures and 3 are waiting to have revision surgery (51% in total). Of those who have undergone revision surgery, 7 hips re-dislocated since and 3 of those needed further re-revision. Discussion: Dislocation following primary THA remains a problem with varying dislocation rates quoted in the literature. In our series, 51% of patients presenting with dislocation required revision surgery. All patients in this series had 28 mm or smaller femoral heads. The financial impact of the burden of revision surgery continues to increase. In this series in isolation the cost of revision surgery totalled greater that £500,000

The efficacy of traction before an attempted closed reduction for patients with developmental dislocation of the hip remains controversial. We treated 55 children (62 dislocations of the hip) by preliminary, prolonged traction for a mean of eight weeks. All were followed up for at least two years in order to observe the development of any avascular changes within the femoral head. Of the 55 children, 27 (31 dislocations) were followed up until they were over six years of age. Fifty-seven of the 62 hips (92%) showed a successful closed reduction. Only one had radiological evidence of avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Of the 31 hips which were followed up to over six years of age, 15 (48%) showed residual subluxation. Our method of prolonged preliminary traction leads to a high rate of successful closed reduction, a low incidence of avascular necrosis and a reduced need for secondary operations

The long term results of closed reduction of the hip for DDH were reviewed to determine if the presence of the ossific nucleus had an effect on outcome. The clinical and radiological outcome of a single-surgeon series of closed reduction for DDH was assessed in a strictly defined group of 48 hips in 42 patients with an average of 11.1 years follow up. In 50% of cases, the ossific nucleus was absent. 100% of patients had an excellent or good result (Severin classification) at final follow-up. 8.3% (4 hips) demonstrated evidence of avascular necrosis. Three were Kalamchi & MacEwen Type I and one was type II. Two of the AVN cases did not demonstrate an ossific nucleus at closed reduction, and both developed type I AVN. 6 hips underwent further surgery. The acetabular index and center-edge angle were not significantly different between the affected and unaffected hip at final follow-up. There was no relationship between the presence or absence of an ossific nucleus at the time of closed reduction and the final outcome. In this well defined group, closed reduction is safe and provides excellent results in the long-term. The absence of an ossific nucleus is not detrimental to the final outcome

Thanks to neonatal screening, idiopathic congenital dislocation of the hip (CDH) is generally diagnosed and treated at an early age. Despite this measure, late diagnosis of CDH still occurs. The goal of this article is to analyse the results of Petit-Morel’s closed reduction (CR) technique in the treatment of CDH diagnosed between 1 and 5 years old. We reviewed 72 hips in 60 patients. The treatment method was the same for all patients, beginning by bilateral longitudinal traction to achieve ‘presentation’ of the hip. It was followed by ‘penetration’ in a hip spica cast made under general anesthesia. The third step was an almost systematic surgical treatment of the remaining acetabular dysplasia. Results were evaluated using the radiological Severin score. Average follow-up was 11.9 years. The failure of CR occurs only twice. In this two cases, open reduction showed intraarticular obstacles to reduction. The only case of avascular necrosis (AVN) occured in one of this two failures of CR. At last follow-up, 95.8% of hips were rated as normal, or midly deformed. Young age at treatment significantly influenced the prognosis in our series. Neither the gender nor the height of the dislocation did appear to have any influence on the result. The patients which did not undergo a periacetabular osteotomy were significantly younger than the other one in the series. Pelvic osteotomy is an integral part of the method, as after 18 months many hips have lost their capacity to correct the remaining dysplasia. However, we only perform this osteotomy if the hip shows no sufficient correction during the semesters following the reduction od the dislocation. Considering Severin score, it is impossible to privilege closed or open reduction, as the results of both methods are close. However, in case of failure of reduction, which occurs in both methods, a second open reduction is much more difficult to achieve than and open reduction in a hip first treated by closed reduction. The results of this second surgery on the hip are poorer, with higher rates of AVN. Moreover, long-term functional and radiological deterioration of the hip is higher after open reduction than closed reduction. Lowest rates of AVN are reported after traction followed by closed reduction compared with exteporaneous reduction or open reduction, thanks to progressive reduction of the hip. Finally, mention should be made of the cost of the treatment. Petit-Morel’s protocole is expensive, both because of the duration of stay in the hospital, and by indirect costs as parent adaptation of its work during the treatment. The cost of open reduction is lower. However, considering the prooved better results of the closed method, requiring lower rates of further surgical procedure, we think that this method is the one to be promoted for treatment of CDH in children between 1 and 5 years old

We report a rare case of Hip Resurfacing dislocation three years after a bilateral Hip Resurfacing in a very strong patient and show the maneuver to do a closed reduction on a film done at the surgical theatre under general anesthesia. Hip resurfacing dislocation is a very rare entity described in the literature and more rare after three years. With conventional total hip replacement the dislocation rate is 2–5%. In the international literature the dislocation rate with resurfacing is 0.21%. We describe a case of a 47 years old male patient who was submitted to a biltateral 54 × 60 mm Hip Resurfacing in November 16 th and 18th, 2011 (two separate days). He had a normal post op and returned to his work after six weeks and recreational activities after four months. Three years later, on November 8th, 2014 he did an extreme movement of hip flexion, adduction and internal rotation when he was gardening and planting a tree seedling suffering a left hip dislocation. Hopefully we could reduce the dislocated hip in a closed manner in the following morning. Patient went home next day but on that same night had important abominal pain needing to return to hospital when numerous gallbladder stones where found being submitted to a total laparoscopic colecistectomy two days later. It was really a bad luck week. Metal ions are still normal and patient is symptomless until today having returned to his recreational activities. We will show in a movie the maneuver to do this closed reduction and hope by showing this maneuver that our colleagues do not have to do an open dislocation in the future in case they face a Hip Resurfacing dislocation

Aim. To determine the outcome, the need for revision surgery, quality of life (QOL) of patients and the financial implications of instability following successful closed reduction of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods. Retrospective study. Parameters studied include indications for primary hip replacement, femoral head size, outcome in terms of the rate of recurrent dislocation, time to second dislocation and the need for revision surgery. QOL assessment was made cross-sectionally at a minimum follow-up of 1 year using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire. Results. Over a 6-year period, 99 patients presented with 101 first time dislocated primary total hip replacements. Mean patient age was 71 years. Head size used was 28mm or smaller in all the hips. All the dislocations underwent successful closed reduction. 61 (60.4%) hips re-dislocated and the median time to the second episode was 103 days. At one-year follow up, 7 patients had died. Of the remaining 94 hips in 92 patients, 48 (51%) THAs have undergone revision procedures. Post-revision, 15% of the hips re-dislocated and more than half of those needed a further surgical procedure to correct the instability. The mean OHS and the EQ-5D health state was observed to get worse with recurrent dislocation and revision surgery and the difference between the mean Oxford hip scores of the revision surgery group and the other 2 groups was statistically significant. The total cost of instability exceeded well over half a million pounds in our series. Discussion. Dislocation following primary THA continues to be a problem and recurrent dislocation presents a significant management challenge. Revision surgery is expensive, has a high failure rate when performed for instability and significantly worsens the QOL of these patients. The financial impact of the burden of revision surgery continues to increase

The treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip diagnosed after the first year of life remains controversial. A series of 36 children (47 hips), aged between one and 4.9 years underwent gradual closed reduction using the Petit-Morel method. A pelvic osteotomy was required in 43 hips (91.5%). The patients whose hips did not require pelvic osteotomy were among the youngest. The mean age at final follow-up was 16.1 years (11.3 to 32). The mean follow-up was 14.3 years (10 to 30). At the latest follow-up, 44 hips (93.6%) were graded as excellent or good according to the Severin classification. Closed reduction failed in only two hips (4.3%) which then required open reduction. Mild avascular necrosis was observed in one (2.1%). The accuracy of the reduction and associated low complication rate justify the use of the Petit-Morel technique as the treatment of choice for developmental dysplasia of the hip in patients aged between one and five years

Background: Closed reduction of intra-articular calcaneal fractures sometimes lack the accuracy desired for restoring the normal anatomy of the articular surface of the calcaneus. In this study, we evaluate the preliminary results of closed reduction of the intra-articular calcaneal fractures with an Ilizarov frame. Patients and Method: Forty patients (25 males and 15 females) with 50 intra-articular fracture calcaneal fractures were treated with closed reduction and an Ilizarov frame. The mean age was 25.4 years (range from 19 to 65). Union was achieved after two months. The results were evaluated on the basis of combined clinical and radiological examination at the latest follow-up. Results were classified according to the protocol and scoring system used by Paley and Hall 1993. Results: The mean follow up period was 1.9 years (range 6 months to 4 years). At final follow up there were 15 excellent feet, 26 were good, 6 fair and 3 poor. The mean Bohler angle postoperatively was 260 (range 17 to 35). Superficial infection occurred in seven feet and was controlled. Skin pressure necrosis of the posterior aspect of the heel occurred in three feet. One needed a skin graft. Conclusion: This method is a minimally invasive technique. The technique has the ability to restore the normal anatomy, shape and length of the calcaneal body, especially in Sander’s type III and type IV fractures. It is particularly useful for osteoprotic bone as it provides rigid fixation