Introduction. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has demonstrated significant benefits, including improved accuracy of component positioning compared to conventional jig-based TKA. However, previous studies have often failed to associate these findings with clinically significant improvements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Inertial measurement units (IMUs) provide a more nuanced assessment of a patient's functional recovery after TKA. This study aims to compare outcomes of patients undergoing robotic-assisted and conventional TKA in the early postoperative period using conventional PROMS and wearable sensors. Method. 100 patients with symptomatic end-stage knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary TKA were included in this study (44 robotic-assisted TKA and 56 conventional TKA). Functional outcomes were assessed using ankle-worn IMUs and PROMs. IMU- based outcomes included impact load, impact asymmetry, maximum knee flexion angle, and bone stimulus. PROMs, including Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EuroQol-Five Dimension (EQ-5D-5L), EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) were evaluated at preoperative baseline, weeks 2 to 6 postoperatively, and at 3-month postoperative follow-up. Results. By postoperative week 6, when compared to conventional TKA, robotic-assisted TKA was associated with significant improvements in maximum knee flexion angle (118o ± 6.6 vs. 113o ± 5.4; p=0.04), symmetrical loading of limbs (82.3% vs.22.4%; p<0.01), cumulative impact load (146.6% vs 37%; p<0.01), and bone stimulus (25.1% vs 13.6%; p<0.01). Whilst there were no significant differences in PROMs (OKS, EQ-5D-5L, EQ-VAS, and FJS-12) at any time point between the two groups, when comparing OKS subscales, significantly more robotic-assisted TKA patients achieved an ‘excellent’ outcome at 6 weeks compared to conventional (47% vs 41%, p= 0.013). Conclusions. IMU-based metrics detected an earlier return to function among patients that underwent robotic-assisted TKA compared to conventional TKA that PROMs were unable to detect within the first six weeks of surgery

Objective. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (CAMI-TKA) has gained increasing interest from orthopaedic surgeons due to its advantages in improving accuracy of component placement combined with benefits in postoperative recovery due to a smaller incision. However, long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes are lacking. The purpose of the present study is to compare the long-term radiographic features and functional outcomes between patients who underwent CAMI-TKA and those who underwent conventional TKA. Methods. One hundred and eight patients who were randomized to undergo CAMI-TKA or conventional TKA during 2004 and 2005 were contacted by phone for a prospective follow-up review. Patients who have passed away or declined to participate in the study were excluded. Patients were asked to return to the hospital for clinical and functional assessments, long-leg and knee roentgenograms. Baseline characteristics were compared to account for potential confounders and multivariate statistical analysis applied to account for any differences in baseline characteristics. Results. As shown in Figure 1, a total of 101 patients (93.52%) were contacted, and 69 patients (63.89%) returned to hospital for assessments and investigations. By the time of this study, two patients from the Conventional TKA group had undergone revision TKA, one due to infection and one due to aseptic loosening. The average follow up time was 9.07 years (8.51–9.61 years). Subsequent comparison was carried out between 37 patients from the conventional TKA group and 30 from the CAMI-TKA group. Both groups had similar pre-operative demographics, clinical and functional assessments except for the Function Score component of the Knee Society Score (Conventional=50 vs. CAMI=55, p=0.049). At follow-up, the Short Form-36 and Knee Society Scores were comparable between the two groups. However, patients from CAMI group reported a significantly higher Oxford Knee Score compared to those from conventional group (p=0.013). No significant intergroup differences were found in mechanical knee alignment and component placement angle in the coronal views. In the sagittal views, the femoral components demonstrated a more extensional configuration in the conventional group, in contrary to a more flexional configuration in the CAMI group (1.0° extension vs. 1.5° flexion, p<0.001). There also existed a significant difference in sagittal tibial component angles, where the conventional group had a steeper posterior slope compared to the CAMI group (5.1° vs. 2.5°, p=0.002). Four knees from CAMI-TKA group and 1 knee from Conventional TKA group were found to have non-progressive radiolucencies between the components and bone cuts, without statistical or clinical significance. No other patients demonstrated any migrating or shifting of the prosthesis that could be construed as possible failure in either group. Conclusions. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty provided similar clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty after an average of 9 years follow-up. This technique can be employed to exploit its short-term advantages without compromising long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes

This RCT compared electromagnetic (EM) navigated and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in terms of clinical and functional outcomes. 200 patients (navigated=102, conventional=98) were recruited. Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) and the American Knee Society Score (AKSS) were recorded pre operation, 3 and 12 months after surgery. Post operative (coronal, sagittal and rotational) alignment was analysed from 3D CT scans taken 3 months after surgery. An objective functional assessment was completed using electrogoniometry on a sub group (navigated=60, conventional=57) at 12 months post surgery. The EM group showed statistically significantly improved OKS (p=0.04) and AKSS (p=0.03) scores at 3 months post operation. However at 12 months post surgery there was no difference between the two groups. At the 1 year follow up it was reported that 9% of the navigated compared to 14% of the conventional group were dissatisfied with their surgical outcome. The mechanical axis alignment of 90% of the navigated group was within 3 degrees of neutral compared to 84% of the conventional group. Although all alignment parameters except for tibial rotation was improved in the navigated group they did not reach significance apart from femoral slope alignment (p=0.01). There was no statistically difference between the surgical groups in terms of the maximum, minimum and excursion knee joint angles during 12 functional activities. Only the knee kinematic function cycles for level walking resulted in statistically significant higher knee joint angles during 55–70% of the gait cycle in the navigated group. Knee alignment was better restored following EM navigated TKA relative to conventional TKA, but the difference was not significant. The EM group showed greater clinical and functional improvements at early follow-up; however this difference was not sustained at 12 months. The EM group reported minimal gait improvements. Proving cost-effectiveness for navigation systems in TKA remains a challenge

INTRODUCTION. Total knee replacement is mostly done with alignment rods in order to achieve a proper Varus / Valgus alignement. Other techniques are computer assisted navigation or MRI based preoperative planning. iASSIST™ is a computer assisted stereotaxic surgical instrument system to assist the surgeon in the positioning of the orthopaedic implant system components intra-operatively. It is imageless and the communication between the PC and the “Pod's” does not require any direct camera view, it is a bluethooth comunication system. This study presents preliminary results utilizing iASSIST™. The aim of this study was to test and compare radiographic alignment, functional outcomes, and perioperative morbidity of the iASSIST™ Knee system versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. METHODS. In a prospective randomized trial we investigated 60 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Each surgical procedure was conducted by highly experienced surgeons. In both groups the implant Legacy LPS-Flex Fixed Bearing Knee was used (Zimmer®, Warsaw, Indiana). The groups were equally divided and randomized by hazard. For clinical evaluation, the Short Form-36 and Knee Society Score were obtained. For the radiological assessment mediCAD® Classic, a digital measurement system, was used. The aim of the study was the comparison of results after 3 months. Results. 2 patients refused any further participation, and 5 cases required a switch to a conventional alignement technique intraoperatively due to technical problems. Average BMI and average age did not differ in both groups. Surgical time in the iASSIST™ group amounted to 100 minutes, in the conventional group to 76 min. Postoperative functional outcomes were statistically insignificant, showing slight improvements of the Combined Knee Society Score, Knee Society Knee Score, and Knee Society Function Score favouring the iASSIST method, and slight improvements of knee flexion. Short Form-36 physical scales slightly favoured the conventional method but not significantly. The mean deviation from neutral mechanical axis was 1.68°±1.9° within the iASSIST group, and 2.73°±2.1° within the conventional TKA group. Conclusion. IASSIST™ is a valuable computer navigation system. The 5 technical troubles were due to the learning curve. The clinical results after 3 months did not differ significantly, the radiological assessment showed a tendency of improved alignement in the iASSIST™ group

Few previous studies showed that the conventional total knee replacement (TKR) has affection to the same side of talar tilt (TT). We expected to prevent this problem by the computer-assisted (CAS) TKR. The purpose of this study was to compare between pre and post-operative talar tilt and ankle clinical assessment on the CAS TKR and the Conventional TKR in 28 patients (56 knees) whom underwent bilateral TKR. 28 patients, 56 knees, whom underwent both CAS total knee replacement (TKR) and conventional total knee replacement (TKR), in both knees, with the combination of Gap Balance and Measurement Resection techniques performed by one surgeon (P. Sriphirom) at Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok. The post-operative has a 12 months follow-up for ankle radiographic finding by tibiotalar angle (TTA), tibial articular surface angle (TAS), and talar tilt (TT) = (TAS-TTA) and for ankle clinical assessment by foot functional index (FFI) from pre-operation and post-operation from both groups. The study also compares the CAS TKR with the Conventional TKR for pre-operation and post-operation. 56 knees, 28 patients, mean age = 67.79 years whom underwent bilateral TKR by the Conventional group and the CAS group had pre-operative TT (TT = TAS − TTA). The Conventional group = 1.5 (−5, 8), the CAS group = 0.5 (−5, 8), P value = 0.65. On post-operative TT the Conventional group = 0.0 (−5, 3), the CAS group = 1.0 (−3, 8), the P value = 0.4. The comparison of pre-operative TT and post-operative TT in the Conventional group, the P value = 0.01. On pre-operative TT and post-operative TT in the CAS group, the P value = 0.65. TT was significantly different in the Conventional group but was not significantly different in the CAS group. The ankle clinical assessment by foot functional index (FFI), which are (1) Pain, (2) Difficulty living, and (3) Daily life activity limitation. The pre-operative FFI in the Conventional group = 1.85 (0.81, 6.88) and pre-operative FFI in the CAS group = 1.91 (0.24, 66.5), the P value = 0.57. The post-operative FFI in the Conventional group = 1.68 (0.24, 7.0) and post-operative FFI in the CAS group = 1.65 (0.24, 6.76), the P value = 0.04, which showed a significantly different between the post-operative FFI from both groups. In the Conventional group the post-operative FFI was not significantly different from pre-operative FFI, the P value = 0.2 but for the CAS group the post-operative FFI was not significantly different from pre-operative FFI, the P value = 0.04. This study showed that the conventional TKR effected to post-operative talar, tilt but CAS TKR has less effect and was not significantly different to ankle joint. Finally, the study needs to be conducted on more patients and to be observed on a longer term follow-up

We report our five-year functional results comparing navigated and conventional total knee replacement. To our knowlege this represents the first Level 1 study comparing function in navigated and conventional total knee replacement at five years. An origianl cohort of 71 patients undergoing Duracon (Stryker Orthopaedics, St. Leonards, Australia) total knee replacement without patellar resurfacing were prospectively randomised to undergo operation using computer navigation (Stryker Image Free Computer Navigation System (version 1.0; Stryker Orthopaedics))(n=35) or a jig-based method (n=36). The two groups were matched for age, gender, height, weight, BMI, ASA grade abd pre-operative deformity. All operations were performed by a single surgeon. Reviews were undertaken by senior physiotherpist blinded to participant status using validated outcome scoring tools (Knee Society Score, WOMAC Score and Short Form SF-36 Score). All patients underwent CT scanning of the implanted prosthesis as per Perth CT Knee Protocol to assess component alignment. After 5 years 24 patients in the navigated group and 22 patients in the conventional group were available for review. At 5 years no statistically significant difference was seen in any of the aforementioned outcome scores when comparing navigated and conventional groups. No statistically significant differencewas seen between 2- and 5-year results for either group. Due to the relatively low numbers in each group these data were compared with retrospective cohorts of navigated (n=100) and conventional (n=70) Duracon total knee replacements performed outwith this study over the same 5-year period. WITHIN the retrospective cohorts no statistically significant differences were found when comparing any of the aforementioned outcome scores. In addition, when comparing parallel scores between prospective and retrospective groups again no statistically significant differences were identified. At 5-years post-operatively the functional outcome between computer navigated and conventional total knee replacement appears to be no different despite the better alignment achieved using navigation

We previously compared component alignment in total knee replacement using a computer-navigated technique with a conventional jig based method. Improved alignment was seen in the computer-navigated group (Beaver et al. JBJS 2004 (86B); 3: 372–7.). We also reported two-year results showing no difference in clinical outcome between the two groups (Beaver et al. JBJS 2007 (89B); 4: 477–80). We now report our five-year functional results comparing navigated and conventional total knee replacement. To our knowlege this represents the first Level 1 study comparing function in navigated and conventional total knee replacement at five years. An original cohort of 71 patients undergoing Duracon (Stryker Orthopaedics, St. Leonards, Australia) total knee replacement without patellar resurfacing were prospectively randomised to undergo operation using computer navigation (Stryker Image Free Computer Navigation System (version 1.0; Stryker Orthopaedics))(n=35) or a jig-based method (n=36). The two groups were matched for age, gender, height, weight, BMI, ASA grade and pre-operative deformity. All operations were performed by a single surgeon. All patients underwent review in our Joint Replacement Assessment Clinic at 3, 6 and 12 months and at 2 and 5 years. Reviews were undertaken by senior physiotherapist blinded to participant status using validated outcome scoring tools (Knee Society Score, WOMAC Score and Short Form SF-36 Score). All patients underwent CT scanning of the implanted prosthesis as per Perth CT Knee Protocol to assess component alignment. After 5 years 24 patients in the navigated group and 22 patients in the conventional group were available for review. At 5 years no statistically significant difference was seen in any of the aforementioned outcome scores when comparing navigated and conventional groups. No statistically significant difference was seen between 2- and 5-year results for either group. Due to the relatively low numbers in each group these data were compared with retrospective cohorts of navigated (n=100) and conventional (n=70) Duracon total knee replacements performed outwith this study over the same 5-year period. WITHIN the retrospective cohorts no statistically significant differences were found when comparing any of the aforementioned outcome scores. In addition, when comparing parallel scores between prospective and retrospective groups again no statistically significant differences were identified. At 5-years post-operatively the functional outcome between computer navigated and conventional total knee replacement appears to be no different despite the better alignment achieved using navigation

Among many factors that influence the outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasties (TKAs), the mechanical alignment has played major roles for the success of TKA, the survival rates of the implants, and patient functionality. Most, but not all, studies have shown that alignment of the mechanical axis in the coronal plane within a range of 3° varus/valgus is associated with improved long-term function and increased survival rates. Robot-assisted TKA has been developed to improve improves the accuracy and precision of component implantation and mechanical axis (MA) alignment. We hypothesised that robot-assisted TKA would lead to a more accurate leg alignment and component implantation, and thus, improve radiological and clinical outcomes. Between January 2003 and December 2004, a total of 98 primary TKA procedures were compared: 49 using a robotic-assisted procedure and 49 using conventional manual techniques. The cohorts were followed for 121.2 and 119.5 months on average, respectively. Radiographic assessments of the patients were performed preoperatively and at final follow-up and made according to the Knee Society Roentgenographic Evaluation System (KSRES) which included measurements of the coronal mechanical axis and sagittal and coronal inclinations of femoral and tibial components. The radiographic measurements were made using a PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System). Clinical assessments were performed preoperatively, and at a final follow-up date that was a minimum of postoperative nine years. The clinical results included ranges of motion (ROM), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores, Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) scores (for pain and function). The radiographic results showed no statistical differences when comparing the means of the two groups. When considering outliers (defined as error ≥ ±3°) for the mechanical axis, femoral coronal and sagittal inclinations, and tibial coronal and sagittal inclinations, the ROBODOC group had zero outliers for all measurements except for one in tibial sagittal inclination. On the other hand, the conventional group had 12 outliers for mechanical axis, 2 for femoral coronal inclination, 3 for femoral sagittal inclination, 3 for tibial coronal inclination, and 4 for tibial sagittal inclination. However, there were no statistically significant differences between groups for ROM, HSS, or WOMAC scores at the final follow-up. The results of this study support previous work and demonstrate that the ROBODOC-assisted implantation of TKA results in better radiographic outcomes and better ligament balance with equivalent safety when compared to conventional TKA at a minimum follow-up of nine years

A functional total knee replacement has to be well aligned, which implies that it should lie along the mechanical axis and in the correct axial and rotational planes. Incorrect alignment will lead to abnormal wear, early mechanical loosening, and patellofemoral problems. There has been increased interest of late in total knee arthroplasty with robot assistance. This study was conducted to determine if robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty is superior to the conventional surgical method with regard to the precision of implant positioning. Twenty knee replacements of ten robot-assisted and another ten conventional operations were performed on ten cadavers. Two experienced surgeons performed the surgery. Both procedures were undertaken by one surgeon on each cadaver. The choice of which was to be done first was randomized. After the implantation of the prosthesis, the mechanical-axis deviation, femoral coronal angle, tibial coronal angle, femoral sagittal angle, tibial sagittal angle, and femoral rotational alignment were measured via three-dimensional CT scanning. These variants were then compared with the preoperative planned values. In the robot-assisted surgery, the mechanical-axis deviation ranged from −1.94 to 2.13° (mean: −0.21°), the femoral coronal angle ranged from 88.08 to 90.99° (mean: 89.81°), the tibial coronal angle ranged from 89.01 to 92.36° (mean: 90.42°), the tibial sagittal angle ranged from 81.72 to 86.24° (mean: 83.20°), and the femoral rotational alignment ranged from 0.02 to 1.15° (mean: 0.52°) in relation to the transepicondylar axis. In the conventional surgery, the mechanical-axis deviation ranged from −3.19 to 3.84°(mean: −0.48°), the femoral coronal angle ranged from 88.36 to 92.29° (mean: 90.50°), the tibial coronal angle ranged from 88.15 to 91.51° (mean: 89.83°), the tibial sagittal angle ranged from 80.06 to 87.34° (mean: 84.50°), and the femoral rotational alignment ranged from 0.32 to 4.13° (mean: 2.76°) in relation to the transepicondylar axis. In the conventional surgery, there were two cases of outlier outside the range of 3° varus or valgus of the mechanical-axis deviation. The robot-assisted surgery showed significantly superior femoral-rotational-alignment results compared with the conventional surgery (p=0.006). There was no statistically significant difference between robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty in the other variants. All the variants were measured with high intraobserver and interobserver reliability. In conclusion, Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty showed excellent precision in the sagittal and coronal planes of the three-dimensional CT. Especially, better accuracy in femoral rotational alignment was shown in the robot-assisted surgery than in the conventional surgery despite the fact that the surgeons who performed the operation were more experienced and familiar with the conventional surgery than with robot-assisted surgery. It can thus be concluded that robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty is superior to the conventional total knee arthroplasty

D-dimer is one of the useful laboratory tests to evaluate the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after the total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The most recent guideline for the prophylaxis of VTE points out the surgical procedure itself is a major risk factor for developing VTE. Only a few literatures discuss the relationship of surgical procedures and the risk of venous thromboembolism. We therefore prospectively compare the difference of the perioperative plasma D-dimer levels between the patients undergoing navigation and convention TKA. Two hundred consecutive total knee arthroplasties were performed between September 2011 and March 2013. The patients were randomised according to their registration to the orthopaedic clinic. Ninety-six patients (100 knees) underwent a navigation-assisted TKA and ninety-four patients (100 knees) had a conventional TKA. No intramedullary violation was done in the navigation-assisted TKA, while the intramedullary femoral guiding was adapted in the conventional group. Pre-operative and post-operation day 1 plasma D-dimer levels were recorded and evaluated using Mann-Whitney U test. There was no difference in the demographic data and pre-operative D-dimer between the two groups (p=0.443). Significantly lower D-dimer levels on the post-operative day 1 were noted in the navigation group, when compared with the conventional group. (6.0 ± 4.4 mg/L vs 11.3 ± 9.6 mg/L, p = 0.000). We demonstrated that lower D-dimer level is developed after the navigation-assisted TKA than the conventional one. Less incidence of VTE is expected and the finding may help to explain the fact that less systemic emboli in the navigation assisted TKA

Introduction

Current CMS reimbursement policy for total joint replacement is aligned with more cost effective, higher quality care. Upon implementation of a standardized evidenced-based care pathway, we evaluated overall procedural costs and clinical outcomes over the 90-day episode of care period for patients undergoing TKA with either conventional (Conv.) or robotic-assisted (RAS) instrumentation.

Alignment and soft tissue balance are two of the most important factors that influence early and long term outcome of total knee arthroplasty.

Current clinical practice involves the use of plain radiographs for preoperative planning and conventional instrumentation for intra operative alignment.

The aim of this study is to assess the Signature^TM Personalised system using patient specific guides developed from MRI. The Signature^TM system is used with the Vanguard^RComplete Knee System. This system is compared with conventional instrumentation and computer assisted navigation with the Vanguard system.

Patients were randomised into 3 groups of 50 to either Conventional Instumented Knee, Computer Navigation Assisted Knee Arthroplasty or Signature Personalised Knee Arthoplasty. All patients had the Vanguard Total knee Arthroplasty Implanted.

All patients underwent Long leg X-rays and CT Scans to measure Alignment at pre-op and 6 months post-op. All patients had clinical review and the Knee Society Score (KSS) at 1 year post surgery was used to measure the outcome.

A complete dataset was obtained for 124 patients. There were significant differences in alignment on Long leg films ot of CT scan with perth protocol. Notably the Signature group had the smallest spread of outliers.

In conclusion the Signature knee system compares well in comparison with traditional instrumentation and CAS Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Introduction

Blood loss after TKA varied, but not uncommon with up to 1500 ml or a decrease in hemoglobin of 3–4 g/dL. In addition to improving prosthetic alignment, computer-assisted TKAs also contribute to reduced operative blood loss and systemic emboli. These observations imply that navigation TKAs may cause less microvascular endothelial damage than conventional TKAs. Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) have been employed as markers for endothelial or vascular damage. We hypothesized serum levels of CAMs in patients receiving navigation TKAs may be different from those receiving conventional TKAs.

Recently, a new technique of custom-made cutting guides for TKA is introduced to clinical practice. However, no published data yet on the comparison between this new technique against both navigation and conventional techniques.

The author prospectively compared between custom-made cutting guides, navigation and conventional techniques. A total number of 90 cases were included in this study with 30 consecutive cases for each technique. The highest number of medically unfit patients and those with articular and extra articular deformities were in custom guides groups.

The results showed one case of aseptic loosening after one year in custom guides, one case of superficial infection and loose pins but with no fracture in navigation group, and higher need for blood transfusion in conventional. One case in the custom guide group had a periprosthetic fracture 3 weeks postoperatively diagnosed as insufficiency fracture after a relatively minor trauma to an osteoporotic bone. Navigation was the most accurate in alignment but custom guides was the most accurate in implant sizing and had the least bleeding.

This clinical study showed some advantages of custom-made cutting guides over conventional instrumentation. It eliminated medullary guides, reduced operative time, and provided better accuracy. The technique was proved to be useful in complex cases of deformities and unfit patients.

BACKGROUND

Trochlear geometry of modern femoral implants is designed for the mechanical alignment (MA) technique for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The biomechanical goal is to create a proximalised and more valgus trochlea to better capture the patella and optimize tracking. In contrast, Kinematic alignment (KA) technique for TKA respects the integrity of the soft tissue envelope and therefore aims to restore native articular surfaces, either femoro-tibial or femoro-patellar. Consequently, it is possible that current implant designs are not suitable for restoring patient specific trochlea anatomy when they are implanted using the kinematic technique. This could cause patellar complications, either anterior knee pain, instability or accelerated wear or loosening. The aim of our study is therefore to explore the extent to which native trochlear geometry is restored when the Persona^® implant (Zimmer, Warsaw, USA) is kinematically aligned.

60 patient where included in this comparative study. Patients where divided into 3 groups. Group A including TKR done navigation guided in a navigation techniques experienced center. Group B including patient done navigation guided in less experienced center. Group c including patients done conventionally by an experienced surgeon. Accuracy was the primary end point. Where an independent observer was requested to comment on the post operative x-ray blindly and to measure accuracy using software. Result showed no significant difference in post operative radiological accuracy in the 3 groups.

Introduction

The conventional bone resection technique in TKA is recognized as less accurate than computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and patient-matched instrumentation (PMI). However, these systems are not available to all surgeons performing TKAs. Furthermore, it was recently reported that PMI accuracy is not always better than that of the conventional bone resection technique. As such, most surgeons use the conventional technique for distal femur and proximal tibia resection, and efforts to improve bone resection accuracy with conventional technique are necessary. Here, we examined intraoperative X-rays after bone resection of the distal femur and proximal tibia with conventional bone resection technique. If the cutting angle was not good and the difference from preoperative planning was over 3º, we considered re-cutting the bone to correct the angle.

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of electromagnetic (EM) navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on post operative function. In this double blinded randomised control trial, patients with osteoarthritis either received TKA using conventional techniques (n = 49) or EM navigation (iNav Portable Navigation System, Zimmer Orthopaedics) (n = 52). All of the patients were reviewed in the Outcomes Clinic at 3 and 12 months. At 12 months post operation the patients completed an objective biomechanical functional assessment using flexible electrogoniometers, which recorded dynamic knee kinematics during daily activities. Knee joint flexion and extension moments were recorded at the 12 month post operation assessment. The functional assessment included validated questionnaires (Oxford Knee Score, American Knee Society Score, WOMAC Score and Short Form SF-36 Score). All patients underwent CT scanning of the implanted prosthesis to assess component alignment. Improved alignment was recorded in the navigated group. However there was no significantly significant difference between the two surgical groups in terms of the subjective questionnaire scores. The biomechanical assessment showed no statistically significant differences in the maximum, minimum or excursion knee joint angles between the two surgical groups during the 12 daily functional tasks. However, significant differences were reported in level and slope walking activities during pre-swing phase (at around 60% of the gait cycle). The navigated group had significantly higher knee joint angles during pre swing suggesting a more vigorous push off into swing phase and a more ‘normal’ gait cycle. The two surgical groups were sub divided into males and females for the strength test. The female navigated group recorded a significantly greater hamstring (p = 0.03) and quadriceps (p = 0.003) moment. There was no significant difference in hamstring or quadriceps moments between the navigated and conventional male groups. The knee kinematics and moment data suggests that the navigated group had an improved functional outcome. However the difference in the post-operation function of the two groups remains minimal despite the better alignment achieved using navigation

There is still want of evidence in the current literature of any significant improvement in clinical outcome when comparing computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (CA-TKA) with conventional implantation. Analysis of alignment and of component orientation have shown both significant and non-significant differences between the two methods. Not much work has been reported on clinical evidence of stability of the joint.

We compared computer-assisted and conventional surgery for TKA at 5.4 years follow-up for patients with varus osteoarthritic knees with deformity of more than 15∗. Our goal was to assess clinical outcome, stability and restoration of normal limb alignment.

We used CT and Cine video X ray techniques to analysize our results in Computer navigated and conventional TKRs. A three dimentional CT scan of the whole extremity was performed and evaluation was done in three planes; saggital, coronal and transverse views. CT scan was done between 10 to 14 days postoperative. Mean deviations in the mechanical axis, femoral and tibial plateau angles, and in transverse view, the trans-epicondylar axis vs posterior condylar axis were measured. The prospective randomized study comprised of 98 patients with surgery done on knees, one side navigated and other side conventional. Mean deviation in the mechanical axis was 2.2∗ in conventional knees and 1.8∗ in navigated knees. In 5 % of cases retinacular release was needed and CT analysis showed TEA in deviation of more than 2 ∗ in these cases. We analysed intraoperative data (surgical time and intraoperative complications), postoperative complications, lower limb alignment, radiographic complication on X-ray imaging, and clinical outcome throughknee and function score, range of motion and joint stability.

Our results showed that CAS had greater consistency and accuracy in implant placement and stability of joint in full extension and 90∗ flexion. In the coronal view, 93.3% in the CAS group had better outcomes compared with EM (73.4%). In the sagittal axis, 90.0% CAS also had better outcomes compared with EM (63.3%). Computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty helps increase accuracy and reduce “outliers” for implant placement.

PURPOSE. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful technique for treating painful osteoarthritic knees. However, the patients' satisfaction is not still comparable with total hip arthroplasty. Basically, the conditions with operated joints were anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient knees, thus, the abnormal kinematics is one of the main reason for the patients' incomplete satisfaction. Bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) TKA was established to reproduce both ACL and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) function and expected to improve the abnormal kinematics. However, there were few reports to evaluate intraoperative kinematics in BCS TKA using navigation system. Hence, the aim in this study is to reveal the intraoperative kinematics in BCS TKA and compare the kinematics with conventional posterior stabilized (PS) TKA. Materials and Methods. Twenty five consecutive subjects (24 women, 1 men; average age, 77 years; age range, 58–85 years) with varus osteoarthritis undergoing navigated BCS TKA (Journey II, Smith&Nephew) were enrolled in this study. An image-free navigation system (Stryker 4.0 image-free computer navigation system; Stryker) was used for the operation. Registration was performed after minimum medial soft tissue release, ACL and PCL resection, and osteophyte removal. Then, kinematics including tibiofemoral rotational angles from maximum extension to maximum flexion were recorded. The measurements were performed again after implantation. We compared the kinematics with the kinematics of paired matched fifty subjects who underwent conventional posterior stabilized (PS) TKA (25 subjects with Triathlon, Stryker; 25 subjects with PERSONA, ZimmerBiomet) using navigation statistically. Results. Preoperative tibiofemoral rotational kinematics were almost the same between the three implants groups. Kinematics at post-implantation found that tibia was significantly internally rotated compared to the kinematics at registration in all three implants at maximum extension position (p<0.05), however the tibial rotational position with BCS TKA was significantly externally rotated at maximum extension position, compared to the other two implant position (p<0.05). The tibial rotational position with Triathlon PS TKA was externally rotated at 60 degrees of flexion compared to the other two implant position, however the results were not statistically significant. Discussion and Conclusion. Previous study found that PCL resection changed tibial rotational position and the amount of tibial internal rotation, affecting postoperative maximum flexion angles. This study found that BCS TKA can reduce the amount of rotational changes, compared to conventional PS TKA. Further studies are needed to investigate the kinematic changes in BCS TKA affect the postoperative clinical outcomes