Introduction: The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is commonly used in the assessment of outcome for knee arthroplasty. All patients having knee arthroplasty at our institution undergo OKS at both nurse led pre-assessment and admission physiotherapy visit, a period of 10 to 30 days pre-operatively. At both instances, the scoring form is left with the patient and collected at the end of the visit.

Anecdotal evidence from our centre suggested that patients attending for arthroplasty surgery were scoring differently at each visit.

The aim of this study is to establish if there is a significant difference OKS at pre-assessment visit and on admission to the ward.

Statistical Method: A pilot study was carried out. A power calculation revealed a requirement for 44 patients to enter the study. The resultant probability was 90 percent that the study would detect a difference at a two sided 5.0 percent significance level, if the minimum clinical difference is 3 points. This is based on the standard deviation of the difference in the response variables of 6. A clinical difference of 3 is drawn from previous studies investigating the use of the OKS.

44 patients undergoing arthroplasty surgery had their OKS for both visits retrospectively analysed.

The mean of the totals of both visits was analysed and found to conform to normality and hence was further investigated by a paired samples t test.

Comparison of individual scoring revealed a violation of normality and hence was further analysed using a Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test.

Results: A statistically significant result at the 5% level was observed t= 2.197 (44df), p= 0.03. OKS at pre-assessment was lower than at admission to the ward by 1.1 point. (−2.1 – 0.9 95% CI).

Analysis of the individual scoring at both intervals revealed only three of the pairs achieved statistical significance and in each case, the difference was less than 3 scoring units. No significant difference was seen when time between assessments was analysed.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that although there is a difference in total scoring using the OKS between two patient episodes prior to arthroplasty, a clinically relevant difference is not detected, and neither is a statistically significant difference detected when all scoring steps are analysed.

This work supports earlier studies that pre-operative assessment using the OKS is robust to variance in the pre-operative scoring window.

All patients undergoing knee arthroplasty at our institution complete Oxford Knee Scoring (OKS) at nurse-led pre-assessment and again at an admission physiotherapy visit on the ward which may be up to 2 months later.

The aim of this study is to establish the extended reproducibility of the OKS by statistical analysis of scores taken at these intervals.

44 patients were required to achieve a 90 % probability to detect a difference at a two-sided 5 % significance level with a minimum clinical difference of 3 points, a cut off used in previous works regarding the use of OKS.

Both the overall population means and the differences between individual questions were analysed by a paired samples t test and a Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test respectively.

Mean interval between attendance for pre-assessment and admission visit was 16 days (7–60).

A statistically significant result at the 5% level was observed for the t test t= 2.197 (44df), p= 0.03. OKS at pre-assessment was lower than at admission to the ward by 1.1 point. (−2.1 – 0.9 95% CI).

Analysis of difference between individual questions revealed only three of the pairs achieved statistical significance and in each case, the difference was less than 3 scoring units.

This study demonstrates that although there is a difference in total scoring using the OKS between two patient episodes prior to arthroplasty, a clinically relevant difference is not detected, and neither is a statistically significant difference detected when all scoring steps are analysed.

The original validation of the OKS was obtained using test-retest reproducibility over a 24 hour period. This work shows that the OKS is robust to violations in reproducibility at duration much greater than this and for practical purposes is valid if taken at any point during the pre-admission phase of care.

Reduced length of stay (LOS) is logistically, economically and physiologically beneficial. Although a high proportion of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients are suitable for same day admission (SDA), removable barriers persist in many centres. This study aimed to determine factors limiting SDA and quantify the impact of implementing both SDA and a targeted enhanced recovery programme on length of stay. This single-centre retrospective cohort study collected data on elective TJA patients aged <60. Qualitative service reviews identified opportunities for optimisation. Improvements were implemented in 2017, including: obtaining consent at the pre-assessment clinic and robustly assessing suitability for SDA. A targeted rapid recovery program was implemented in June 2018. Data was collected prior to changes in 2017, and following changes in 2018. 106 of 108 screened patients were eligible for inclusion. There were no significant between-year differences in baseline health characteristics. Significantly greater proportions of 2018 patients were consented at their pre-assessment clinic (56% vs 8.9%, p<0.001) and assessed as suitable for SDA (94% vs 57.1%, p<0.001). Pre-operative LOS was significantly reduced in 2018 for both total hip replacements (median [IQR]: 0[0,0] vs 1[1,1], p<0.001) and total knee replacements (median [IQR]: 0[0,0] vs 0[0,1], p=0.002). The departmental mean LOS improved from 4.7 days to 3.7 days following SDA. This was further shortened to 3.2 days after introduction of the rapid recovery program. When a larger proportion of patients were deemed suitable for SDA, this correlated with reduction of LOS. The department now performs above national standards in both of these parameters

We retrospectively reviewed 2989 consecutive patients with a mean age of 81 (21 to 105) and a female to male ratio of 5:2 who were admitted to our hip fracture unit between July 2009 and February 2013. We compared weekday and weekend admission and weekday and weekend surgery 30-day mortality rates for hip fractures treated both surgically and conservatively. After adjusting for confounders, weekend admission was independently and significantly associated with a rise in 30-day mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 1.9; p = 0.039) for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. There was no increase in mortality associated with weekend surgery (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.7; p = 0.39). All hip fracture patients, whether managed surgically or conservatively, were more likely to die as an inpatient when admitted at the weekend (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.80; p = 0.032), despite our unit having a comparatively low overall inpatient mortality (8.7%). Hip fracture patients admitted over the weekend appear to have a greater risk of death despite having a consultant-led service.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:373–8.

Following the establishment of regional Major Trauma Networks in England in 2012, there were concerns that pressures regarding resource allocation in Major Trauma Centres (MTCs) may have a detrimental impact on the care of patients with hip fractures in these hospitals. This study aimed to compare outcomes in hip fracture care between MTCs and trauma units (TUs). National Hip Fracture Database data was extracted from 01/01/2015 to 31/12/2022 for all hospitals in England. Outcome measures included perioperative medical and physiotherapy assessments, time to surgery, consultant supervision in theatre, Best Practice Tariff (BPT) compliance, discharge to original residence, and mortality. Data was pooled and weighted for MTCs and remaining hospitals (TUs). A total of 487,089 patients with hip fractures were included from 167 hospitals (23 MTCs and 144 TUs). MTCs achieved marginally higher rates of orthogeriatrician assessment within 72 hours of admission (91.1% vs 90.4%, p<0.001) and mobilisation out of bed by first postoperative day (81.9% vs 79.7%, p<0.001). A lower proportion of patients underwent surgery by the day after admission in MTCs (65.2% vs 69.7%, p<0.001). However, there was significantly higher consultant surgeon and anaesthetist supervision rates during surgery in MTCs (71.8% vs 61.6%, p<0.001). There was poorer compliance with BPT criteria in MTCs (57.3% vs 60.4%, p<0.001), and proportionately fewer MTC patients were discharged to their original residence (63.5% vs 60.4%, p<0.001). There was no difference between MTCs and TUs in 30-day mortality (6.8% vs 6.8%, p=0.825). This study demonstrates that MTCs have greater difficulty in providing prompt surgery to hip fracture patients. However, their marginally superior perioperative care outcomes appear to compensate for this, as their mortality rates are similar to TUs. These findings suggest that the regionalisation of major trauma in England has not significantly compromised the overall care of hip fracture patients

Aims. This study aimed to describe preoperative waiting times for surgery in hip fracture patients in Norway, and analyze factors affecting waiting time and potential negative consequences of prolonged waiting time. Methods. Overall, 37,708 hip fractures in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register from January 2014 to December 2018 were linked with data in the Norwegian Patient Registry. Hospitals treating hip fractures were characterized according to their hip fracture care. Waiting time (hours from admission to start of surgery), surgery within regular working hours, and surgery on the day of or on the day after admission, i.e. ‘expedited surgery’ were estimated. Results. Mean waiting time was 22.6 hours (SD 20.7); 36,652 patients (97.2%) waited less than three days (< 72 hours), and 27,527 of the patients (73%) were operated within regular working hours (08:00 to 16:00). Expedited surgery was given to 31,675 of patients (84%), and of these, 19,985 (53%) were treated during regular working hours. Patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classes 4 and 5 were more likely to have surgery within regular working hours (odds ratio (OR) 1.59; p < 0.001), and less likely to receive expedited surgery than ASA 1 patients (OR 0.29; p < 0.001). Low-volume hospitals treated a larger proportion of patients during regular working hours than high volume hospitals (OR 1.26; p < 0.001). High-volume hospitals had less expedited surgery and significantly longer waiting times than low and intermediate-low volume hospitals. Higher ASA classes and Charlson Comorbidity Index increased waiting time. Patients not receiving expedited surgery had higher 30-day and one-year mortality rates (OR 1.19; p < 0.001) and OR 1.13; p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion. There is inequality in waiting time for hip fracture treatment in Norway. Variations in waiting time from admission to hip fracture surgery depended on both patient and hospital factors. Not receiving expedited surgery was associated with increased 30-day and one-year mortality rates. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(9):710–720

Aims. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of a pilot enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme on length of stay (LOS) and post-discharge resource usage via service evaluation and cost analysis. Methods. Between May and December 2019, 100 patients requiring hip or knee arthroplasty were enrolled with the intention that each would have a preadmission discharge plan, a preoperative education class with nominated helper, a day of surgery admission and mobilization, a day one discharge, and access to a 24/7 dedicated helpline. Each was matched with a patient under the pre-existing pathway from the previous year. Results. Mean LOS for ERAS patients was 1.59 days (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 2.04), significantly less than that of the matched cohort (3.01 days; 95% CI 2.56 to 3.46). There were no significant differences in readmission rates for ERAS patients at both 30 and 90 days (six vs four readmissions at 30 days, and nine vs four at 90 days). Despite matching, there were significantly more American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 3 patients in the ERAS cohort. There was a mean cost saving of £757.26 (95% CI £-1,200.96 to £-313.56) per patient. This is despite small increases in postoperative resource usage in the ERAS patients. Conclusion. ERAS represents a safe and effective means of reducing LOS in primary joint arthroplasty patients. Implementation of ERAS principles has potential financial savings and could increase patient throughput without compromising care. In elective care, a preadmission discharge plan is key. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):966–973

Although day surgery has a good patient satisfaction and safety profile, accurate episode-of-care costs (EOCC) calculation for of this procedure compared to standard same-day admission (SDA), while considering functional outcomes, is not well known. This study assesses the EOCC for patients with a THA while comparing DS and Same Day Admission (SDA) (with a 1-day hospitalization) pathways. The episode-of-care cost (EOCC) of 50 consecutive day surgery and SDA patients who underwent a THA was evaluated. The episode-of-care cost was determined using a bottom-up Time Driven- Activity Based Funding method. Functional outcomes were measured using preoperative and postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS). Overall, the SDA THA cost 11% more than a DS THA. The mean total EOCC of DS THA was 9 672 CAD compared to 10 911 CAD in the SDA THA group. Both groups showed an improvement in HHS score following the procedure but patients in the DS group had a significantly higher postoperative HHS score and a significantly greater improvement in their HHS score postoperatively. Day surgery THA is cost-effective, safe and associated with high patient satisfaction due to functional improvement. Providing policymakers the information to develop optimal financing methods is paramount for clinicians wishing to develop modern protocols, increase productivity while providing the optimal care for patients

In patients admitted to hospital with a hip fracture, urinary issues are common. Despite guidelines that recommend avoiding foley catheter usage when possible, it remains a common part of perioperative care. To date, there is no prospective data on the safety and satisfaction associated with catheter use in such cohort. The aim of this study was to evaluate the satisfaction of patients when using a foley catheter while they await surgery for their fractured hip and the safety associated with catheter use. In our prospectively collected database, 587 patients were admitted to our tertiary care center over a 1 year period. Most patients (328) were catheterized within the first 24h of admission, primarily inserted in ED. Of these patients, 119 patients (61 catheterized and 58 noncatheterized) completed a questionnaire about their perioperative management with foley catheter usage administered on day 1 of admission. This was used to determine satisfaction of catheter use (if catheterized) and pain levels (associated with catheterized or associated with transferring/voiding if not catheterized). Adverse effects related with catheter use included urinary tract infection (UTI) and post-operative urinary retention (POUR). Ninety-five percent of patients found the catheter to be convenient. Only 5% of patients reported any pain with catheter use. On the contrary, 47.5% of non-catheterized patients found it difficult to move to the bathroom and 30.4% found it difficult to urinate. Catheterized patients had significative less pain than uncatheterized patients (0.62/10 vs 2.45/10 respectively, p < 0 .001). The use of nerve block reduced pain levels amongst catheterized patients but was not associated with reduced pain levels or satisfaction amongst non-catheterized patients. The use of catheter was not associated with increased risk of UTI(17.5% in the catheterized vs 13.3% in the non-catheterized, p = 0.541) or POUR (6.8% in the catheterized vs 11.1% in the non-catheterized, p = 0.406). This study illustrates the benefits and safety associated with the use of urinary catheters in the pre-operative period amongst hip fractures. The use of catheters was associated with reduced pain and satisfaction without increasing post-operative UTI or POUR. These findings suggest that pre-operative catheter use is associated with less pain and more satisfaction for patients awaiting hip surgery and whom other measures, such as nerve blocks, are unlikely to reduce the discomfort associated with the mobility required to void. A prospective randomized control study could lead to a more evidence based approach for perioperative foley catheter usage in hip fracture patients

The treatment for Humeral Supracondylar fractures in children is percutaneous fixation with Kirschner wires using a unilateral or crossed wire configuration. Capitellar entry point with divergent wires is thought crucial in the lateral entry approach. Crossed wire configuration carries a risk of Ulnar nerve injury. Our department had recorded a number of failures and this required review. A search was conducted for children with this injury and surgical fixation. A two year time frame was allocated to allow for adequate numbers. The hospitals radiography viewing system and patient notes were utilized to gather required information. 30 patients from 2–14 years all underwent surgery on the day of admission or the following day. 18 had sustained Gartland grade 3 or 4 injuries. Unilateral configuration was used in 10 cases; a loss of reduction was noted in 5 of these with one case requiring reoperation. Crossed wires were used in 20 cases with a loss of reduction in 1. Crossed wire configuration provides a more reliable fixation with a lower chance or re-operation. Our DGH policy now advises the use of this configuration. A small “mini-open” ulnar approach is utilized with visualization and protection of the nerve

The aim of this study was to evaluate the peri-operative (30-day) mortality following hip fracture and look at the variables which influence early mortality after this injury. A prospective audit of all patients admitted with hip fracture was undertaken over an 18-month period. An independent research assistant collected data on a standardised questionnaire. Data included basic demographics, comorbidities, mental test score, mobility and social status, All patients received prophylactic antibiotics and thromboprophylaxis and surgery was undertaken on dedicated trauma and hip fracture operating lists. There were 1072 patients admitted with hip fracture: 829 females (77%) and 240 males (23%) with a mean age of 80 years (range 24–103 years). The basic fracture types were intracapsular (n=616; 58%); extracapsular (n=414; 38%); subtrochanteric (n=29; 3%) and periprosthetic (n=12; 1%). 69 patients (7%) had acute medical problems which delayed anaesthesia. Delays to surgery, because of a lack of theatre resources, were common and only 314 patients (29%) had their hip fracture fixed on the day of admission or the following day. There were 9 deep infections (0. 8%) and 69 patients (6%) died within 30 days of surgery. Linear regression analysis showed that the 30-day mortality was not associated with pre-injury mobility or mental test score (p=0. 224). Any delay to surgery (2 days or more) resulted in a significant increase in mortality (p=0. 0042) and the risk of death increased 21% for every day surgery was delayed. Subgroup analysis showed that acute medical comorbidity was the most important factor influencing mortality with an odds ratio for death of 4. 9 (p=0, 0007). Delay to surgery in medically fit patients (n= 633) gave an odds ratio for death of 1. 6. In this group, the risk of death increased 16% for every day surgery was delayed with an 85% probability (p=O. 125) that this trend was significant. The peri-operative mortality for hip fractures is now quite low (6%). Acute medical comorbidities are the most important cause of early post-operative death. Delay to surgery may be a factor in medically fit patients and our data suggests that the ideal time for surgery is the day after admission

Introduction: Chance fractures in children are rare the mechanism of injury is a flexion-distraction inertial force created during a motor vehicle accident when wearing a two-point seat belt or lap belt. High velocity paediatric Chance fractures are frequently associated with intra-abdominal injuries, although this may not be appreciated at the time of initial presentation. Methods: The cases of two brothers who sustained Chance fractures with complete neurological deficits and intra-abdominal injuries from a motor vehicle accident are presented. Results: The two brothers were rear seat passengers in car involved in a head-on collision with a tree. They were both wearing three point seat belts but had removed the chest straps, thus effectively converting them to a two-point harness. Case 1. Boy age 3 years 10 months sustained a bony Chance fracture through the L3 vertebrae with a complete neurological deficit at the L1 level. There was an associated closed head injury and severe abdominal bruising. He underwent a CT scan of his abdomen on day of admission and posterior stabilisation of the spinal fracture on day 4. Seven days post-admission he was diagnosed with pancreatitis. He continued to have abdominal pain and vomiting. Further repeat abdominal CT scans, ultrasound examinations and abdominal contrast studies were performed. Ten weeks following admission he underwent laparotomy and a section of ischaemic small bowel was removed. Case 2. Boy age 2 years 8 months presented with a ligamentous Chance fracture of L2 / L3 with a complete neurological deficit at T12. He had a closed head injury and severe abdominal bruising. He underwent CT scan on the day of admission and a diagnostic peritoneal tap on day two with aspiration of straw coloured fluid. The spinal fracture was stabilised 10 days post-admission with posterior instrumentation. On day 14 he underwent a laparoscopy and subsequent laparotomy with drainage of an abscess secondary to a perforated caecum. Discussion: Chance fractures or flexion-distraction fractures of the spine are rare occurrences in children with few cases reported. They represent severe trauma and are often related to the wearing of two-point seat belt fixation. There is a high associated incidence of abdominal injuries which may be difficult to diagnose. The authors support the view of Beaunoyer. 1. that a diagnostic laparoscopy or laparotomy should be considered strongly in patients with lumbar Chance fractures. Abdominal bruising and neurological defi cit are cardinal signs, reflecting severe trauma

Introduction. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept in arthroplasty surgery has led to a reduction in postoperative length of stay in recent years. Patients with prolonged length of stay (PLOS) add to the burden of a strained NHS. Our aim was to identify the main reasons. Methods. A PLOS was arbitrarily defined as an inpatient hospital stay of four days or longer from admission date. A total of 2,000 consecutive arthroplasty patients between September 2017 and July 2018 were reviewed. Of these, 1,878 patients were included after exclusion criteria were applied. Notes for 524 PLOS patients were audited to determine predominant reasons for PLOS. Results. The mean total length of stay was 4 days (1 to 42). The top three reasons for PLOS were social services, day-before-surgery admission, and slow to mobilize. Social services accounted for 1,224 excess bed days, almost half (49.2%, 1,224/2,489) of the sum of excess bed days. Conclusion. A preadmission discharge plan, plus day of surgery admission and mobilization on the day of surgery, would have the potential to significantly reduce length of stay without compromising patient care. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-8:488–493

Background. Advances in surgical and anesthetic technique have resulted in a reducing length of stay for lumbar decompression, with the first day case procedure published in the literature in 1980. Current evidence suggests day case surgery is associated with improved patient satisfaction, faster recovery, reduced infection rates and financial savings. Following the introduction of a locally agreed day case protocol for lumbar microdiscectomy, we reviewed our 30-day postoperative complication rates. Aims. To review postoperative complication rates for patients who underwent day case primary lumbar microdiscectomy. Methods. We studied all patients that met a locally agreed day case protocol for lumbar microdiscectomy and were operated upon between 1. st. March 2013 and 31. st. December 2015. Results. 134 patients underwent primary day case microdiscectomy (70 males, 64 females). The cohort had a mean age of 41 years (16–82). 96% (n=129) were single level procedures, 93% were unilateral (n=125). 81% (n=109) took place at either L4/L5 or L5/S1. All patients were discharged on the same day as admission and operation. 3% (n=4) of patients re-presented to hospital within 30 days of which 75% (n=3) were reviewed and discharged from the emergency department within 4 hours, following a satisfactory clinical review. One patient required an inpatient stay for a washout of a superficial postoperative infection. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that with adherence to robust listing and discharge protocols, day case lumbar microdiscectomy can be safely performed. Our 30-day postoperative complication rate of under 1% is comparable to that of traditional inpatient primary lumbar microdiscectomy. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Although supracondylar fracture is a very common elbow injury in childhood, there is no consensus on the timing of surgery, approach for open reduction and positioning of fixation wires. We report our ten-year experience between 1993 and 2003 in 291 children. Most fractures (285; 98%) were extension injuries, mainly Gartland types II (73; 25%) and III (163; 56%). Six (2%) were open fractures and a neurovascular deficit was seen in 12 (4%) patients. Of the 236 children (81%) who required an operation, 181 (77%) were taken to theatre on the day of admission. Most (177; 75%) of the operations were performed by specialist registrars. Fixation was by crossed Kirschner wires in 158 of 186 (85%) patients and open reduction was necessary in 52 (22%). A post-operative neurological deficit was seen in nine patients (4%) and three (1%) required exploration of the ulnar nerve. Only 22 (4%) patients had a long-term deformity, nine (3%) from malreduction and three (1%) because of growth arrest, but corrective surgery for functional limitation was required in only three (1%) patients

Hip fracture is a common injury with a high associated mortality. Many recommendations regarding timing of operative intervention exist for patients with such injuries. The Best Practice Tariff was introduced in England and Wales in 2010, offering financial incentives for surgery undertaken within 36 hours of admission. The England and Wales National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Guidance states that surgery should be performed on the day or day after admission. Due to lack of clear evidence, this recommendation is based on Humanitarian grounds. NICE have called for further research into the effect of surgical timing on mortality. We utilised data from the National Hip Fracture database prospectively collected between 2007 and 2015, comprising 413,063 hip fractures. Using 11 variables, both Cox and Logistic regression analysis was used to establish the effect on mortality of each 12 hour interval from admission to surgery. For each 12 hour time frame from admission to surgery a trend for improved 30 day survival was demonstrated the earlier the surgery was performed. However, this did not reach significance until beyond 48 hours (Hazard ratio of 1.12, 95% CI: 1.04–1.20). Surgery after 48 hours suffered significantly higher chance of mortality compared to surgery done within 12 hours. This is the largest analysis undertaken to date. Lowest mortality rates are found within the 0–12 hour window. After 48 hours there is a significant increased risk of mortality compared to the 0–12 hour time frame. As such, expeditious surgery within 48 hours can be justified both on humanitarian and survivorship grounds. Hip fracture surgery performed within 48 hours is associated with reduced mortality when compared to that beyond this time. This is in agreement with Blue Book recommendations and extends the currently recommended NICE and Best Practice Tariff targets of 36 hours

Aims. Few studies have investigated potential consequences of strained surgical resources. The aim of this cohort study was to assess whether a high proportion of concurrent acute surgical admissions, tying up hospital surgical capacity, may lead to delayed surgery and affect mortality for hip fracture patients. Methods. This study investigated time to surgery and 60-day post-admission death of patients 70 years and older admitted for acute hip fracture surgery in Norway between 2008 and 2016. The proportion of hospital capacity being occupied by newly admitted surgical patients was used as the exposure. Hip fracture patients admitted during periods of high proportion of recent admissions were compared with hip fracture patients admitted at the same hospital during the same month, on similar weekdays, and times of the day with fewer admissions. Results. Among 60,072 patients, mean age was 84.6 years (SD 6.8), 78% were females, and median time to surgery was 20 hours (IQR 11 to 29). Overall, 14% (8,464) were dead 60 days after admission. A high (75. th. percentile) proportion of recent surgical admission compared to a low (25. th. percentile) proportion resulted in 20% longer time to surgery (95% confidence interval (CI) 16 to 25) and 20% higher 60-day mortality (hazard ratio 1.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.4). Conclusion. A high volume of recently admitted acute surgical patients, indicating probable competition for surgical resources, was associated with delayed surgery and increased 60-day mortality. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):264–270

Aim. The objective of this study was to define hospital-related healthcare costs associated with infection after fracture fixation (IFF) of the tibia and identify the subset of clinical variables relevant in driving these costs within the Belgium's healthcare system. Method. Between January 1. st. 2009 and January 1. st. 2014, a total of 358 patients treated operatively for AO type 41, 42 and 43 tibial fractures, were included in this study. The calculated costs were related to the Belgium's healthcare financing context and limited to costs induced by hospital related care. Five main hospital-related cost categories were studied: honoraria, materials, hospitalization, day care admission, and pharmaceuticals. In addition, a total of 19 clinical and process variables were defined. Results. The median total treatment cost for all tibial fractures was €6.962 euro (IQR €4932 – €10.972), with AO type 42 being the most expensive fracture type. In 12 (3.4%) patients the treatment was complicated by deep (implant-related) infection. Subsequently, the treatment costs for deep (implant-related) infection were almost 7-times higher compared to non-infected patients (€44.680 vs. €6.855 p<0.001) with hospitalization, length of stay (LOS), accounting for 50% of the total amount of the cost. The bivariate correlation between total treatment costs and LOS was close to 1. Multivariate analyses showed deep (implant-related) infection, non-union, age and ASA-3 as most important drivers (p<0.001) for both the total treatment costs and LOS. Moreover, the LOS was also driven by a delayed staged surgery protocol. Conclusions. One of the most challenging complications in trauma surgery is the development of IFF. Infections associated with fracture fixation devices result in significant patient morbidity and a prolonged treatment period. Currently, there is a lack of data regarding the definition, functional outcome and health care burden of this musculoskeletal complication. This study shows that treatment costs for deep (implant-related) infection were almost 7-times higher compared to non-infected patients. Furthermore, LOS accounted for 50% of the total amount of the cost. This study shows that future research needs to focus more on prevention rather than treatment strategies, not only to reduce patient morbidity but also to reduce the socio-economic impact

Introduction. Occult hip fractures occur in 3% of cases. Delay in treatment results in significantly increased morbidity and mortality. NICE guidelines recommend cross-sectional imaging within 24 hours and surgery on the day of, or day after, admission. MRI was the standard imaging modality for suspected occult hip fractures in our institution, but since January 2013, we have switched to multi-detector CT (MDCT) scan. Our aims were to investigate whether MDCT has improved the times to diagnosis and surgery; and whether it resulted in missed hip fractures. Patients/Materials & Methods. Retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients between 01/01/2013 and 31/08/2014 who had MDCT scan for suspected occult hip fracture. Missed fracture was defined as a patient re-presenting with hip fracture within six weeks of a negative scan. A comparative group of consecutive MRI scans from 01/01/2011 to 31/12/2012 was used. Results. Seventy-three MDCTs and 70 MRIs were included. MDCT identified nine hip fractures and other fractures in 27 patients. Mean time to scan for MDCT was 13 hours 37 minutes compared with 53 hours 36 minutes for MRI scan (p<0.001). 88.5% of MDCTs were performed within 24 hours compared with 33.3% of MRIs. Nine and 16 patients required surgery in the MDCT and MRI groups, respectively. Mean time to surgery for MDCT was 50 hours 41 minutes compared with 223 hours 21 minutes for MRI scan (p = 0.25). There were no missed hip fractures in the patients with negative MDCT scan. Discussion. MDCT scan has led to a significant reduction in time to diagnosis, and a large reduction in time to surgery. MDCT did not miss any hip fractures. Conclusion. We advocate the use of MDCT over MRI in suspected occult hip fractures as it is cheaper, quicker, and more readily available; and does not result in missed hip fractures

Delayed management of high energy femoral shaft fractures is associated with increased complication rates. It has been suggested that there is less urgency to stabilize lower energy femoral shaft fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of surgical delay on 30-day complications following fixation of lower energy femoral shaft fractures. Patients ≥ 18 years who underwent either plate or nail fixation of low energy (falls from standing or up to three steps' height) femoral shaft fractures from 2005 – 2016 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) via procedural codes. Patients with pathologic fractures, fractures of the distal femur or femoral neck were excluded. Patients were categorized into early (< 2 4 hours) or delayed surgery (2–30 days) groups. Bivariate analyses were used to compare demographics and unadjusted rates of complications between groups. A multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the rate of major and minor complications between groups, while adjusting for relevant covariables. Head injury patients and polytrauma patients are not included in the NSQIP database. Of 2,716 lower energy femoral shaft fracture patients identified, 2,412 (89%) were treated within 1 day of hospital admission, while 304 (11.2%) were treated between 2 and 30 days post hospital admission. Patient age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification score, presence of diabetes, functional status, smoking status, and surgery type (nail vs. plate) were significantly different between groups (p After adjusting for all relevant covariables, delayed surgery significantly increased the odds of 30-day minor complications (p=0.02, OR = 1.48 95%CI 1.01–2.16), and 30-day mortality (p < 0 .001), OR = 1.31 (95%CI 1.03–2.14). The delay of surgical fixation of femoral shaft fractures appears to significantly increase patients' risk of minor adverse events as well as increase mortality. With only 89% of patients being treated in the 24 hour timeframe that constitutes best practice for treatment of femoral shaft fractures, there remains room for improvement. These results suggest that early treatment of all femoral shaft fractures, even those with a lower energy mechanism of injury, leads to improved outcomes