Dislocation is one of the most common causes of patient and surgeon dissatisfaction following hip replacement and to treat it, the causes must first be understood. Patient factors include age greater than 70 years, medical comorbidities, female gender, ligamentous laxity, revision surgery, issues with the abductors, and patient education. Surgeon factors include the annual quantity of procedures and experience, the surgical approach, adequate restoration of femoral offset and leg length, component position, and soft-tissue or bony impingement. Implant factors include the design of the head and neck region, and so-called skirts on longer neck lengths. There should be offset choices available in order to restore soft-tissue tension. Lipped liners aid in gaining stability, yet if improperly placed may result in impingement and dislocation. Late dislocation may result from polyethylene wear, soft-tissue destruction, trochanteric or abductor disruption and weakness, or infection. Understanding the causes of hip dislocation facilitates prevention in a majority of instances. Proper pre-operative planning includes the identification of patients with a high offset in whom inadequate restoration of offset will reduce soft-tissue tension and abductor efficiency. Component position must be accurate to achieve stability without impingement. Finally, patient education cannot be over-emphasised, as most dislocations occur early, and are preventable with proper instructions. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B, Supple A:67–9

Dislocation is a serious complication to be avoided in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and its incidence risk increases in revision surgery. Combined anteversion (CA) of the cup and stem is a concept for appropriate implant positioning; however, the effect of functional changes in femoral rotation has not been well investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate whether functional CA, considering femoral rotation, is associated with dislocation in patients undergoing revision THA. Seventy-three patients who underwent revision THA and had at least one year of follow-up with pre- and postoperative supine CT imaging were included. Cup and stem were placed with a target combined angle of 37.3° using Widmer's formula. Anatomical and functional CA was calculated postoperatively using the following formula: Anatomical CA: cup anteversion + 0.7 × anatomical stem anteversion; Functional CA: cup anteversion + 0.7 × (anatomical stem anteversion + femoral rotation). Patient demographics, cup and stem angles, CA and their relationship to dislocation were statistically evaluated. Dislocation was observed in 12 patients. In these dislocated cases, there were no significant differences in cup angle, stem angle and anatomical CA compared to non-dislocated cases. However, dislocated cases showed significantly higher values of functional CA [52.7 ± 17.5° (range, 5.9–69.3) vs. 36.0 ± 12.5° (range, 8.6–68.8), p=0.009] and significant deviation from identical CA [17.3 ± 9.6° (range, 2.8–32) vs. 7.5 ± 7.1° (range, 0.1–28.7), p=0.010]. Functional CA considering femoral rotation was associated with dislocation in revision THA patients. This finding suggests that consideration of femoral rotation may be necessary for implant positioning in revision THA

Aims. Patients with femoral neck fractures (FNFs) treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA) have an almost ten-fold increased risk of dislocation compared to patients undergoing elective THA. The surgical approach influences the risk of dislocation. To date, the influence of differing head sizes and dual-mobility components (DMCs) on the risk of dislocation has not been well studied. Methods. In an observational cohort study on 8,031 FNF patients with THA between January 2005 and December 2014, Swedish Arthroplasty Register data were linked with the National Patient Register, recording the total dislocation rates at one year and revision rates at three years after surgery. The cumulative incidence of events was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox multivariable regression models were fitted to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of dislocation, revision, or mortality, stratified by surgical approach. Results. The cumulative dislocation rate at one year was 8.3% (95% CI 7.3 to 9.3) for patients operated on using the posterior approach and 2.7% (95% CI 2.2 to 3.2) when using the direct lateral approach. In the posterior approach group, use of DMC was associated with reduced adjusted risk of dislocation compared to 32 mm heads (HR 0.21 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.68); p = 0.009). This risk was increased with head sizes < 32 mm (HR 1.47 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.98); p = 0.010). Neither DMC nor different head sizes influenced the risk of revision following the posterior approach. Neither articulation was associated with a statistically significantly reduced adjusted risk of dislocation in patients where the direct lateral approach was performed, although this risk was estimated to be HR 0.14 (95% CI 0.02 to 1.02; p = 0.053) after the use of DMC. DMC inserted through a direct lateral approach was associated with a reduced risk of revision for any reason versus THA with 32 mm heads (HR 0.36 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.99); p = 0.047). Conclusion. When using a posterior approach for THA in FNF patients, DMC reduces the risk of dislocation, while a non-significant risk reduction is seen for DMC after use of the direct lateral approach. The direct lateral approach is protective against dislocation and is also associated with a lower rate of revision at three years, compared to the posterior approach. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(7):844–851

Large femoral heads have become popular in total hip replacement (THR) as a method of reducing the risk of dislocation. However, if large heads are used in ceramic-on-ceramic THR, the liner must be thinner, which may increase the risk of fracture. To compare the rates of ceramic fracture and dislocation between 28 mm and 32 mm ceramic heads, 120 hips in 109 patients (51 men and 58 women, mean age 49.2 years) were randomised to THR with either a 28 mm or a 32 mm ceramic articulation. A total of 57/60 hips assigned to the 28 mm group and 55/60 hips assigned to the 32 mm group were followed for at least five years. No ceramic component fractures occured in any patient in either group. There was one dislocation in the 32 mm group and none in the 28 mm group (p = 0.464). No hip had detectable wear, focal osteolysis or prosthetic loosening. In our small study the 32 mm ceramic articulation appeared to be safe in terms of ceramic liner fracture. . Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1459–63

Dual-mobility (DM) bearings are effective to mitigate dislocation in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, data on its use for treating dislocation is scarce. Aim of this study was to compare DM bearings, standard bearings and constrained liner (CL) in revision THA for recurrent dislocation and to identify risk factors for re-dislocation. We reviewed 100 consecutive revision THAs performed for dislocation from 2012 and 2019. 45 hips (45%) received a DM construct, while 44 hips (44%) and 11 hips (11%) had a standard bearing and CL, respectively. Rates of re-dislocation, re-revision for dislocation and overall re-revision were compared. Radiographs were assessed for cup positioning, restoration of centre of rotation, leg length and offset. Risk factors for re-dislocation were determined by cox regression analysis. Modified Harris hip scores (mHHS) were calculated. Mean follow-up was 53 months (1 to 103). DM constructs were used more frequently in elderly patients (p=0.011) and hips with abductor deficiency (p< 0.001). The re-dislocation rate was 11.1% for DM bearings compared with 15.9% for standard bearings and 18.2% for CL (p=0.732). Revision-free survival for DM constructs was 83% (95% CI 0.77 – 0.90) compared to 75% (95% CI 0.68 – 0.82) for standard articulations and 71% (95% CI 0.56 – 0.85) for CL (p=0.455). Younger age (HR 0.91; p=0.020), lower comorbidity (HR 0.42; p=0.031), smaller heads (HR 0.80; p=0.041) and cup retention (HR 8.23; p=0.022) were associated with re-dislocation. Radiological analysis did not reveal a relationship between restoration of hip geometry and re-dislocation. mHHS significantly improved from 43.8 points to 65.7 points (p<0.001) with no differences among bearing types. Our findings suggest that DM bearings do not sufficiently prevent dislocation in revision THA for recurrent dislocation. Reconstruction of the abductor complex may play a key role to reduce the burden in these high-risk patients

The primary aim of this study was to determine dislocation and revision total hip replacement (THR) up to ten years following primary THR, as well as rates of polyethylene wear, in patients previously enrolled in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) which compared 28 mm and 36 mm metal on highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) articulations. 328 primary THR patients were enrolled in the RCT in Australia. Dislocation was identified from hip instability and hospital visit questionnaires completed by patients or, if they were unable to do so, by their next of kin or primary carer, or General Practitioner. All reported dislocations were confirmed radiographically. Patients' names were cross-matched with the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry to determine whether the index hip had undergone revision THR. Linear wear was measured on plain radiographs using PolyWare (Rev 5, Draftware Developers, Vevay IN, USA). A separate RCT examined the mean proximal wear rate of 28 and 36 mm articulations using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). At 10 years, 110 patients were deceased and 3 patients were lost to follow-up. Overall, dislocation was identified in 8 of 167 (5%) patients with a 28 mm articulation and 2 of 158 (1%) patients with a 36 mm articulation. Three patients experienced recurrent dislocation; all had a 28 mm articulation. 320 (163 28 mm; 157 36 mm) patients were successfully cross-matched with Registry data to identify revision THR. Three patients, all with a 28 mm articulation, underwent revision because of dislocation. Other reasons for revision were infection (1:2), periprosthetic fracture (0:3), loosening/lysis (1:2) and liner fracture (0:1). Adequate radiographs were available to measure wear in 122 hips (67:55) using PolyWare. Excluding bedding in, the mean annual linear wear rate from 1–10 years was 0.04 mm/yr for both 28 and 36 mm articulations (p=0.48). The more sensitive RSA data indicated that at 7 years following primary THR, the mean annual wear rate did not exceed 0.02 mm/yr with either articulation. Up to 10 years following primary THR, 36 mmm articulations were associated with fewer dislocations and revisions for dislocation and did not increase the mean annual linear wear rate

Aims. Use of the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has increased in recent years due to proposed benefits, including a lower risk of dislocation and improved early functional recovery. This study investigates the dislocation rate in a non-selective, consecutive cohort undergoing THA via the DAA without any exclusion or bias in patient selection based on habitus, deformity, age, sex, or fixation method. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing THA via the DAA between 2011 and 2017 at our institution. Primary outcome was dislocation at minimum two-year follow-up. Patients were stratified by demographic details and risk factors for dislocation, and an in-depth analysis of dislocations was performed. Results. A total of 2,831 hips in 2,205 patients were included. Mean age was 64.9 years (24 to 96), mean BMI was 29.2 kg/m. 2. (15.1 to 53.8), and 1,595 patients (56.3%) were female. There were 11 dislocations within one year (0.38%) and 13 total dislocations at terminal follow-up (0.46%). Five dislocations required revision. The dislocation rate for surgeons who had completed their learning curve was 0.15% compared to 1.14% in those who had not. The cumulative periprosthetic infection and fracture rates were 0.53% and 0.67%, respectively. Conclusion. In a non-selective, consecutive cohort of patients undergoing THA via the DAA, the risk of dislocation is low, even among patients with risk factors for instability. Our data further suggest that the DAA can be safely used in all hip arthroplasty patients without an increased risk of wound complications, fracture, infection, or revision. The inclusion of seven surgeons increases the generalizability of these results. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7 Supple B):38–45

Introduction. Dislocated hip hemiarthroplasties (HA) are associated with a 45% revision rate and 40% mortality rate. Implant selection for HA operations vary with no universally accepted implant choice. The WHiTE3 trial suggested older designs such as the Thompson has equitable outcomes to more modern and expensive implants such as the Exeter V40+Unitrax. Our multi-centre consecutive series of NOFs patients treated with HA assesses the impact of surgical and patient factors on dislocation risk. Methods. Medical and radiographic records for patients treated between 1. st. January 2009 and 30. th. September 2017 with a HA at three acute hospitals were reviewed. Implant and dislocation data were recorded. Patient demographics, comorbidities and operation details were extracted from the medical records and NHFD. Patients were excluded if there were no postoperative radiographs or when HA had been performed as a revision procedure. Results. We identified 4305 consecutive patients with 189 excluded. There was no difference in patient characteristics between the hospitals or implant types (p>0.05). Four HA implants were used during the study period; Thompson, Austin-Moore, Furlong and Exeter V40+Unitrax. 63 dislocations were identified (1.5%), median time to dislocation was 24 days. Dislocation rates for Thompson HAs were significantly higher (p=0.004) at 3.7%. No association was demonstrated with cemented versus uncemented, bipolar versus monopolar, fixed versus variable offsets, operating surgeon grade and dislocation rates (p>0.05). Patient factors (preoperative AMTS, postoperative AMTS, preoperative mobility and ASA grade) had no effect on dislocation (p>0.05). Discussion. Our study which is reflective current implant choices, demonstrates that Thompson implants for HA after NOFs have a significantly higher dislocation rates than other common prostheses, and their continued use should be reconsidered. This effect has not been demonstrated in previous studies. Patient, implant construct and surgeon factors had little bearing on the subsequent dislocation rate

Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty in individuals treated for acute hip fracture is up to 10 times more frequent than in elective patients. Whilst approach plays a role, the effect of head sizes in conventional THA and dual mobility cups (DMC) is less studied in fracture cases. The total dislocation rate at 1-year and 3-year revision rates were recorded in this observational study on 8,031 patients with acute hip fracture, treated with a THA 2005–2014. Swedish Arthroplasty Register data were linked with the National Patient Register. Cox multivariable regression models were fitted to calculate adjusted hazard ratios stratified by approach and head size. The cumulative risk of dislocation during year 1 was 2.7% (95% CI 2.2–3.2) with lateral approach and 8.3% (7.3–9.3) with posterior approach (KM estimates). In the posterior approach group DMC was associated with a lower risk of dislocation compared to cTHA=32mm (HR=0.21; 0.07–0.68), whilst a head size <32mm carried a higher risk (HR=1.47; 1.10–1.98). These differences were no longer visible when revision in general was used as outcome. Neither of the implant designs influenced the dislocation risk when direct lateral approach was used. Male gender and severe comorbidity increased the risk. DMC with lateral approach was associated with a reduced risk of revision in general (HR=0.36; 0.13–0.99). Head size did not influence the revision risk. When aiming to reduce the risk of any dislocation, lateral approach – regardless of cup/head design – is referable. If, for any reason, posterior approach is used, DMC is associated with the lowest risk of dislocation. This is not reflected in analysing revision in general as outcome. An interpretation could be that there are different thresholds for dislocation prompting revision

Local anatomical abnormalities vary in congenital hip disease patients. Authors often present early to mid-term total hip arthroplasty clinical outcomes using different techniques and implants randomly on patients with different types of the disease, making same conclusions difficult. We report long term outcomes (13 to 23 years) of the treatment of low and high dislocation cases (separately) with total hip arthroplasty using TM technology acetabular cups (Implex initially and then Zimmer) and short fluted conical (Zimmer) femoral stems. From 2000 to 2010, 418 congenital hip disease hip joints were treated in our department with total hip arthroplasty. According to Hartofilakidis et al's classification, 230 hips had dysplasia, 101 low dislocation, (group A) and 87 high dislocation (group B). Pre-operative and post-operative values, at regular intervals, of HHS, SF-12, WOMAC, OHS and HOOS were available for all patients. Patient, surgeon and implant related failures and complications were recorded for all patients. In all cases an attempt was made to restore hip center of rotation. In group A the average lengthening was 2.8 cm (range: 1 to 4.2) and in group B 5.7 cm (range: 4.2 to 11). In both groups, no hips were revised due to aseptic loosening of either the acetabular cup or the femoral stem. In group A, a cumulative success rate of 95.6% (95% confidence interval, 92.7% – 97.4%) and in group B a cumulative success rate of 94.8% (95% confidence interval, 92.6%–96.9%) was recorded, at 20 years, with revision for any reason as an end point. No s.s. differences were found between groups when mean values of HHS, SF-12, WOMAC and OKS were compared. Satisfactory long-term clinical outcomes can be achieved in treating different types of congenital hip disease when appropriate surgical techniques combined with “game changing” implants are used

Aims. Dislocation remains a significant complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA), being the third leading indication for revision. We present a series of acetabular revision using a dual mobility cup (DMC) and compare this with our previous series using the posterior lip augmentation device (PLAD). Methods. A retrospective review of patients treated with either a DMC or PLAD for dislocation in patients with a Charnley THA was performed. They were identified using electronic patient records (EPR). EPR data and radiographs were evaluated to determine operating time, length of stay, and the incidence of complications and recurrent dislocation postoperatively. Results. A total of 28 patients underwent revision using a DMC for dislocation following Charnley THA between 2013 and 2017. The rate of recurrent dislocation and overall complications were compared with those of a previous series of 54 patients who underwent revision for dislocation using a PLAD, between 2007 and 2013. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean distribution of sex or age between the groups. The mean operating time was 71 mins (45 to 113) for DMCs and 43 mins (21 to 84) for PLADs (p = 0.001). There were no redislocations or revisions in the DMC group at a mean follow-up of 55 months (21 to 76), compared with our previous series of PLAD which had a redislocation rate of 16% (n = 9) and an overall revision rate of 25% (n = 14, p = 0.001) at a mean follow-up of 86 months (45 to 128). Conclusion. These results indicate that DMC outperforms PLAD as a treatment for dislocation in patients with a Charnley THA. This should therefore be the preferred form of treatment for these patients despite a slightly longer operating time. Work is currently ongoing to review outcomes of DMC over a longer follow-up period. PLAD should be used with caution in this patient group with preference given to acetabular revision to DMC. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(4):423–425

This matched cohort study aims to (a) assess differences in spinopelvic characteristics of patients having sustained a dislocation following THA and a control THA group without dislocation; (b) identify spinopelvic characteristics associated with risk of dislocation and; (c) propose an algorithm to define the optimum cup orientation for minimizing dislocation risk. Fifty patients with a history of THA dislocation (29 posterior-, 21 anterior dislocations) were matched for age, gender, body mass index, index diagnosis, and femoral head size with 100 controls. All patients were reviewed and underwent detailed quasi-static radiographic evaluations of the coronal- (offset; center-of-rotation; cup inclination/anteversion) and sagittal- reconstructions (pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, pelvic-femoral-angle, cup ante-inclination). The spinopelvic balance (PI-LL), combined sagittal index (CSI= Pelvic-femoral-angle + Cup Anteinclination) and Hip-User-Index were determined. sagittal index (CSI= Pelvic-femoral-angle + Cup Anteinclination) and Hip-User-Index were determined. Parameters were compared between the two groups (2-group analysis) and between controls and per direction of dislocation (3-group analysis). There were marginal coronal differences between the groups. Sagittal parameters (lumbar-lordosis, pelvic-tilt, CSI, PI-LL and Hip-User-Index) differed significantly. PI-LL (>10°) and standing pelvic tilt (>18°) were the strongest predictors of dislocation risk (sensistivity:70%/specificity:70%). All hips with a standing CSI<195° dislocated posteriorly and all with CSI>260° dislocated anteriorly. A CSI between 200–245° was associated with significantly reduced risk of dislocation (OR:6; 95%CI:2.5–15.0; p<0.001). In patients with unbalanced and/or rigid lumbar spine, standing CSI of 215–245° was associated with significantly reduced dislocation risk (OR:10; 95%CI:3.2–29.8; p<0.001). PI-LL and standing pelvic-tilt determined from pre-operative, standing, lateral spinopelvic radiograph can be useful screening tools, alerting surgeons of patients at increased dislocation risk. Measurement of the pelvic-femoral angle pre-operatively provides valuable information to determine the optimum, cup orientation associated with reduced dislocation risk by aiming for a standing CSI of 200–245°

Background. The use of the direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has increased in recent years. This is in part due to the proposed benefits of a faster early recovery and a lower risk of dislocation. The purpose of this study is to understand the dislocation rate in a non-selective, consecutive cohort of patients undergoing THA via the DAA including those at high risk for instability due to spinopelvic pathology. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of a large prospectively collected single institution database assessing all patients undergoing THA via the DAA between 2011 and 2017. The primary outcome measure was dislocation at minimum two-year follow-up. We then stratified patients by known risk factors for dislocation including spinopelvic pathology and performed an in-depth analysis of those patients who had a dislocation event. Results. 2,831 hips in 2205 patients were included in the study. Mean age was 64.9 (24–96) and 1,595 (56.3%) were female. Mean BMI was 29.2 (15.1–53.8). There were 11 dislocations within one year of the index operation (0.38%) and 13 total dislocations at terminal follow-up (0.45%). Five dislocations required revision (38.4% of dislocations 0.17% overall). When stratified by experience the dislocation rate for surgeons who had completed their learning curve was 0.15% compared to 1.11% in those who hadn't. There were 666 patients with an established diagnosis of spinopelvic pathology or prior surgical instrumentation, only 2 (0.30%) dislocated and neither required revision. Conclusion. In a non-selective, consecutive cohort of patients undergoing THA via the DAA the risk of dislocation is low. Even amongst patients with lumbosacral stiffness secondary to spinal instrumentation or degenerative changes, the rate of dislocation is low following THA via the DAA. Our data suggests that utilizing the DAA in high risk patients may be protective against dislocation without the need for additional constraint or the use of newer bearing constructs that lack long term outcome studies. The inclusion of seven surgeons suggests that these results are generalizable

Introduction. The rise of the anterior approach (AA) in primary surgery has led to enthusiasm for using this approach in revision surgery, especially because head and liner exchanges have been accompanied by a high dislocation rate when the posterior approach (PA) is used. The aim of this study was to compare the institutional dislocation rate comparing the PA and AA in isolated head and liner exchange. Methods. A retrospective institutional database query was done to identify all aseptic head and liner exchanges between the years 2010- June, 2020. 186 hips were identified with an average age of 64.8+/−10.8 yrs (27.9–87.6) and average BMI of 28.7+/−6.3 kg/m2 (16.2–52). The reason for revision was polyethylene wear and osteolysis in 105 hips (56.5%), adverse tissue reaction to metal on metal (MOM) in 43 hips (23.1%), and recurrent instability in 38 hips (20.4%). The approach used for the revision surgery was PA in 128 hips (68.8%) and AA in 58 hips (31.2%). The mean follow-up for this cohort is 1.9±2 yrs (0.0–8.6). Results. The overall dislocation rate for the entire cohort was 28/186 (15%). There was no difference in the dislocation rate whether the revision surgery was performed by the PA 19/128 (15%) or the AA 9/58 (16%) (p=0.9). With the numbers available, there was no difference in dislocation rates when comparing reason for revision: poly wear/osteolysis 12/105 (11%), MOM 8/43 (19%) or recurrent instability 8/38 (21%) (p=0.28). The head size used in the exchange did not influence the dislocation rate; 28 mm-2/11 (18%), 32 mm-6/56 (11%), 36 mm-16/91 (18%), 40 mm-4/26 (15%) (p=0.89). Conclusion. The use of either the PA or AA did not alter the dislocation rate in our cohort. While there was a trend towards a higher dislocation rate when liner exchange was performed for MOM or recurrent instability, no statistical difference was shown with the numbers available. The head size used in the revision did not influence the rate of dislocation

Aims. Concurrent hip and spine pathologies can alter the biomechanics of spinopelvic mobility in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study examines how differences in pelvic orientation of patients with spine fusions can increase the risk of dislocation risk after THA. Patients and Methods. We identified 84 patients (97 THAs) between 1998 and 2015 who had undergone spinal fusion prior to primary THA. Patients were stratified into three groups depending on the length of lumbar fusion and whether or not the sacrum was involved. Mean age was 71 years (40 to 87) and 54 patients (56%) were female. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 30 kg/m. 2. (19 to 45). Mean follow-up was six years (2 to 17). Patients were 1:2 matched to patients with primary THAs without spine fusion. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated. Results. Dislocation in the fusion group was 5.2% at one year versus 1.7% in controls but this did not reach statistical significance (HR 1.9; p = 0.33). Compared with controls, there was no significant difference in rate of dislocation in patients without a sacral fusion. When the sacrum was involved, the rate of dislocation was significantly higher than in controls (HR 4.5; p = 0.03), with a trend to more dislocations in longer lumbosacral fusions. Patient demographics and surgical characteristics of THA (i.e. surgical approach and femoral head diameter) did not significantly impact risk of dislocation (p > 0.05). Significant radiological differences were measured in mean anterior pelvic tilt between the one-level lumbar fusion group (22°), the multiple-level fusion group (27°), and the sacral fusion group (32°; p < 0.01). Ten-year survival was 93% in the fusion group and 95% in controls (HR 1.2; p = 0.8). Conclusion. Lumbosacral spinal fusions prior to THA increase the risk of dislocation within the first six months. Fusions involving the sacrum with multiple levels of lumbar involvement notably increased the risk of postoperative dislocation compared with a control group and other lumbar fusions. Surgeons should take care with component positioning and may consider higher stability implants in this high-risk cohort

Aims. Instability continues to be a troublesome complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patient-related risk factors associated with a higher dislocation risk include the preoperative diagnosis, an age of 75 years or older, high body mass index (BMI), a history of alcohol abuse, and neurodegenerative diseases. The goal of this study was to assess the dislocation rate, radiographic outcomes, and complications of patients stratified as high-risk for dislocation who received a dual mobility (DM) bearing in a primary THA at a minimum follow-up of two years. Materials and Methods. We performed a retrospective review of a consecutive series of DM THA performed between 2010 and 2014 at our institution (Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York) by a single, high-volume orthopaedic surgeon employing a single prosthesis design (Anatomic Dual Mobility (ADM) Stryker, Mahwah, New Jersey). Patient medical records and radiographs were reviewed to confirm the type of implant used, to identify any preoperative risk factors for dislocation, and any complications. Radiographic analysis was performed to assess for signs of osteolysis or remodelling of the acetabulum. Results. There were 151 patients who met the classification of high-risk according to the inclusion criteria and received DM THA during the study period. Mean age was 82 years old (73 to 95) and 114 patients (77.5%) were female. Mean follow-up was 3.6 years (1.9 to 6.1), with five patients lost to follow-up and one patient who died (for a reason unrelated to the index procedure). One patient (0.66%) sustained an intraprosthetic dislocation; there were no other dislocations. Conclusion. At mid-term follow-up, the use of a DM bearing for primary THA in patients at high risk of dislocation provided a stable reconstruction option with excellent radiographic results. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the durability of these reconstructions

The Lubinus SP II is an anatomical femoral stem with high survivorship levels notably described in the Swedish Arthroplasty Register. As the clinical and economic burden of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and periprosthetic fracture (PPF) continues to increase, it has been suggested that use of anatomical stems may facilitate more uniform cement mantles and improve implant survival. The primary aim of this study was to determine the long-term survivorship and PPF rate of the Lubinus SP II 150mm stem in a single UK centre. Between January 2007 and April 2012, 1000 consecutive THAs were performed using the Lubinus SP II femoral stem in our institution. Patient demographics and operative details were collected in a prospective arthroplasty database. Patient records and national radiographic archives were then reviewed at a mean of 12.3 years (SD 1.3) following surgery to identify occurrence of subsequent revision surgery, dislocation or periprosthetic fracture. Mean patient age at surgery was 69.3 years (SD 10.1, 24–93 years). There were 634 women (63%). Osteoarthritis was the operative indication in 974 patients (97%). There were 13 revisions in total (4 for recurrent dislocation, 3 for infection, 6 for acetabular loosening) and 16 dislocations (1.6%). Stem survivorship at 10 years was 99.6% (95 % confidence interval [CI], 99.5%–99.7%) and at 15 years was 98.8% (98.7%–98.9%). The 15-year stem survival for aseptic loosening was 100%. Analysis of all cause THA failure demonstrated a survivorship of 99.1% (99.0%–99.3%) at 10 years and 98.2% (98.1%–98.3%) at 15 years. There were 4 periprosthetic fractures in total (0.4%) at mean 12.3 year follow-up. The Lubinus SP II stem demonstrated excellent survivorship, low dislocation rates and negligible PPF rates up to 15 years following primary THA. Use of anatomical stems such as the Lubinus SPII would appear to be a wise clinical and economic investment for patients and healthcare systems alike

Introduction. There is renewed interest in dislocation after surgical approach with popularization of the direct anterior approach. The purported advantage of both the lateral and direct anterior approaches is decreased risk of dislocation. The purpose of this study was to assess the risk of dislocation by approach following modern primary THA. Methods. All primary THAs at a single academic institution from 2010 to 2017 were analyzed through our institutional total joint registry. There were 7023 THAs including 3754 posterior, 1732 lateral, and 1537 direct anterior. Risk of dislocation was assessed against the competing risks of revision surgery and death as well as by individual patient and surgical factors including surgical approach. Risk of revision surgery was considered as a secondary outcome. Step-wise selection was utilized to develop multivariable models. Clinical outcomes were documented with the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Mean age was 63 years, 51% were female, and mean body mass index (BMI) was 30 kg/m. 2. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Results. The cumulative incidence of dislocation at 1-year and 5-years by approach was as follows: posterior (2.1%; 3.0%), lateral (0.7%; 0.7%), direct anterior (0.4%; 0.4%) (p<0.001) (Figure 1). Compared to the posterior cohort, the adjusted risk of dislocation was decreased for the lateral (hazard ratio [HR]=0.28, p<0.001) and direct anterior cohorts (HR=0.18, p<0.001). The cumulative incidence of revision for instability at 1-year and 5-years by approach was as follows: posterior (0.8%; 1.0%), lateral (0.6%; 0.6%), direct anterior (0%; 0%) (p=0.09). The adjusted risk of all-cause revision surgery was increased among the lateral cohort compared to posterior (HR=1.75, p=0.003) and direct anterior (HR=2.44, p=0.002) and among patients with diagnoses other than osteoarthritis (HR=2.89, p<0.001). Among patients who dislocated, 69 (83%) had anteversion >25° (Figure 2). Mean increase in HHS from preoperative assessment to final follow-up was greatest among direct anterior patients (37 points), followed by posterior patients (33 points), followed by lateral patients (29 points) (p<0.05, all comparisons). Conclusions. This study documents the risk of dislocation by surgical approach among a large contemporary cohort undergoing primary THA. The risk of dislocation was higher following the posterior approach, whereas all-cause revision surgery was found to be higher following the lateral approach. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aims. There is evidence that prior lumbar fusion increases the risk of dislocation and revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The relationship between prior lumbar fusion and the effect of femoral head diameter on THA dislocation has not been investigated. We examined the relationship between prior lumbar fusion or discectomy and the risk of dislocation or revision after THA. We also examined the effect of femoral head component diameter on the risk of dislocation or revision. Methods. Data used in this study were compiled from several Finnish national health registers, including the Finnish Arthroplasty Register (FAR) which was the primary source for prosthesis-related data. Other registers used in this study included the Finnish Health Care Register (HILMO), the Social Insurance Institutions (SII) registers, and Statistics Finland. The study was conducted as a prospective retrospective cohort study. Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used for analysis. Results. Prior lumbar fusion surgery was associated with increased risk of prosthetic dislocation (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.393, p < 0.001) and revision (HR = 1.528, p < 0.001). Head components larger than 28 mm were associated with lower dislocation rates compared to the 28 mm head (32 mm: HR = 0.712, p < 0.001; 36 mm: HR = 0.700, p < 0.001; 38 mm: HR = 0.808, p < 0.140; and 40 mm: HR = 0.421, p < 0.001). Heads of 38 mm (HR = 1.288, p < 0.001) and 40 mm (HR = 1.367, p < 0.001) had increased risk of revision compared to the 28 mm head. Conclusion. Lumbar fusion surgery was associated with higher rate of hip prosthesis dislocation and higher risk of revision surgery. Femoral head component of 32 mm (or larger) associates with lower risk of dislocation in patients with previous lumbar fusion. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(8):1003–1009

Aims. The routine use of dual-mobility (DM) acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty (THA) may not be cost-effective, but an increasing number of patients undergoing THA have a coexisting spinal disorder, which increases the risk of postoperative instability, and these patients may benefit from DM articulations. This study seeks to examine the cost-effectiveness of DM components as an alternative to standard articulations in these patients. Patients and Methods. A decision analysis model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using DM components in patients who would be at high risk for dislocation within one year of THA. Direct and indirect costs of dislocation, incremental costs of using DM components, quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) values, and the probabilities of dislocation were derived from published data. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was established with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY. Sensitivity analysis was used to examine the impact of variation. Results. In the base case, patients with a spinal deformity were modelled to have an 8% probability of dislocation following primary THA based on published clinical ranges. Sensitivity analysis revealed that, at its current average price ($1000), DM is cost-effective if it reduces the probability of dislocation to 0.9%. The threshold cost at which DM ceased being cost-effective was $1180, while the ICER associated with a DM THA was $71 000 per QALY. Conclusion. These results indicate that under specific clinical and economic thresholds, DM components are a cost-effective form of treatment for patients with spinal deformity who are at high risk of dislocation after THA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1297–1302