Displaced femoral neck fractures can have devastating impacts on quality of life and patient function. Evidence for optimal surgical approach is far from definitive. The Hip Fracture Evaluation with Alternatives of Total Hip Arthroplasty versus Hemi-Arthroplasty (HEALTH) trial aimed to evaluate unplanned secondary procedures following total hip arthroplasty (THA) versus hemi-arthroplasty (HA) within two years of initial surgery for displaced femoral neck fractures. Secondary objectives evaluated differences in patient function, health-related quality of life, mortality, and hip-related complications HEALTH is a large randomized controlled trial that included 1,495 patients across 81 centers in 10 countries. Patients aged 50 years or older with displaced femoral neck fractures received either THA or HA. Participants were followed for 24 months post-fracture and a Central Adjudication Committee adjudicated fracture eligibility, technical placement of prosthesis, additional surgical procedures, hip-related complications, and mortality. The primary analyses were a Cox proportional hazards model with time to the primary study endpoint as the outcome and THA versus HA as the independent variable. Using multi-level linear models with three levels (centre, patient, and time), with patient and centre entered as random effects, the effect of THA versus HA on quality of life (Short Form-12 (SF-12) and EQ-5D), function (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)), and mobility (Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)) were estimated separately. The majority of patients were female (70.1%), 70 years of age or older (80.2%), and able to ambulate without the aid of an assistive device before their fracture (74.4%), and the injury in the majority of the patients was a subcapital femoral neck fracture (61.9%). The primary end point occurred in 57 of 718 patients (7.9%) who were randomly assigned to THA and 60 of 723 patients (8.3%) who were randomly assigned to HA (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 1.40; p=0.79). Hip instability or dislocation occurred in 34 patients (4.7%) assigned to total hip arthroplasty and 17 patients (2.4%) assigned to hemi- arthroplasty (hazard ratio, 2.00; 99% CI, 0.97 to 4.09). Function, as measured with the total WOMAC total score, pain score, stiffness score, and function score, modestly favored THA over HA. Mortality was similar in the two treatment groups (14.3% among the patients assigned to THA and 13.1% among those assigned to HA, p=0.48). Serious adverse events occurred in 300 patients (41.8%) assigned to THA and in 265 patients (36.7%) assigned to HA. Among independently ambulating patients with displaced femoral neck fractures, the incidence of secondary procedures did not differ significantly between patients who were randomly assigned to undergo THA and those who were assigned to undergo HA, and THA provided a clinically unimportant improvement over HA in function and quality of life over 24 months

INTRODUCTION. THA as primary treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly still remains a prominent concern. Overall dislocation rate after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is reported form 1∼5%. But, it is quiet different in situation of femur neck fracture in elderly. The THA is associated with higher rates of dislocation (8%∼11%) in eldery compared to hemiarthroplasty even though THA showed better clinical and functional scores. Recently resurgence about THA using DMC comes after improvement of manufacturing technology. The aim of this prospective multicenter study is to assess the rates of dislocation and re-operation for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly with THA with Dual Mobility Cup (DMC) and to review systematically comparison of previous reports. Up to our knowledge, this is first report from asian conutry about the clinical outcomes THA using DMC for displaced femur neck fracture in elderly. METHODS. Prospective consecutive groups of patients treated for displaced femoral neck fractures by three surgeons at each three center were included. 131 hips underwent THA with DMC for acute displaced femoral neck fracture in patients aged older than 70 years. Data regarding rates of dislocation and re-operation were obtained by review of medical records. Additionally From 2009 which the US FDA first approved the DMC, the authors searched reports regarding to THA using DMC for displaced femur neck fracture in elderly using the MEDLINE including cases series and comparative studies with bipolar hemiarthroplasty and THA. Therefore, current report was compared with previous reports. RESULTS. The reports about THA using DMC for displaced femur neck fracture in elderly were limited. Most of them comes from European countries. Comparative study with THA from Sweden reported the dislocation rate of THA using DMC with average aged 75-year is 0%. In Denmark study, the bipolar hemiarthroplasty showed 14% of dislocation rate for femur neck fracture in patient aged 75 years but, THA using DMC is 4.6%. Two cases series from French reported about 1–4% in patients aged 80 years. In our multicenter study, dislocation occurred in 6/131 hips (4.6%) treated with total hip arthroplasty using DMC for displaced femur neck fracture over 70 years older patients. Reoperations including periprosthetic fracture and fixation failure of cup were required in 1/43 (2.3%) hips treated with total hip arthroplasty using DM cup. These result is comparable to European reports. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. Our findings indicate that THA with DMC can not guarantee to prevent the dislocation for high risk elderly patients, but the overall rate of dislocation can be comparable to those of bipolar hemiarthroplasty and reduced compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty. This result might be a valuable messages for burden of the medical cost by dislocation after arthroplasty especially for older patient. Therefore, adding advnatages of THA compared with hemiarthroplasty, the THA with DMC can be a wise option for displaced femoral neck fracture in eldely. But, the randomized controlled study still is needed to clarify to confirm this findings

Few will disagree that the best femoral head that a young patient can have is his or her own, native femoral head. In the active, healthy patient under age 60 with a displaced femoral neck fracture, well-done, timely ORIF presents the best chance of preserving the patient's native femoral head. Arthroplasty is generally reserved for older patients, over age 60, where attempts at ORIF in this setting have demonstrated failure rates over 40%. “Physiologic age” is a somewhat nebulous term that takes into account the health and ambulatory status of the patient. For example, a 52-year-old with end-stage renal failure, severe osteoporosis, and a displaced femoral neck fracture may best be treated with arthroplasty. However, in reality, such situations are quite rare. Recent studies have documented that approximately 80% of young patients with displaced femoral neck fractures treated with ORIF will keep their own femoral head for 10 years after injury. The variables under the surgeon's control include timing of fixation, quality of reduction, accurate implant placement and implant selection, and capsulotomy. All of these variables potentially affect outcomes. Fractures in this young age group are frequently high shear angle (vertical) Pauwels type 3 fractures, and benefit from fixed angle fixation. The author prefers anatomic reduction and stabilization with a sliding hip screw and a superiorly placed derotation screw. Careful attention to detail is important to obtain an anatomic reduction, which is the most important variable in the outcome of these challenging injuries

Worldwide, it is expected that 6.3 million patients will sustain a hip fracture in 2050. Hemiarthroplasty is commonly practiced for displaced femoral neck fractures. The choice between unipolar (UH) or bipolar (BH) hemiarthroplasty is still controversial. The objective of this study was to assess the effect on hip function of BH compared to UH for a displaced femoral neck fracture in elderly patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing BH to UH. Data sources were Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. All data was pooled in Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.3 software. Selection of the studies included, data abstraction, data synthesis, risk of biais and quality of evidence evaluation was done independently by two authors. Our primary outcome was postoperative hip function. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life (HRQoL), acetabular erosion and postoperative complications. 13 randomized controlled trials (n=2256) were eligible for the meta-analysis. There was no difference in hip function scores (standardized mean difference of 0.33 [−0.09–0.75, n=864, I. 2. = 87%,]). Patients with bipolar heads had higher Health-Related Quality of Life scores than patients with unipolar heads (mean difference in EQ-5D scores of 0.12 [0.04–0.19, n=550, I. 2. = 44%]). The use of BH decreased the incidence of acetabular erosion (relative risk of 0.37 [0.17–0.83, n=525, I. 2. = 0%]). There was no relative risk difference for mortality, dislocation, revision and infection. Due to the high heterogeneity between the studies included, it is still unclear whether patients undergoing BH have better hip function than patients undergoing UH. Although, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) may be improved. Future research could be conducted to determine whether a BH offers a better quality of life than UH to geriatric patients undergoing surgery. More precise assessment scores could be developed to better evaluate postoperative outcomes

Few will disagree that the best femoral head that a young patient can have is his or her own, native femoral head. In the active, healthy patient under age 60 with a displaced femoral neck fracture, well-done, timely ORIF presents the best chance of preserving the patient's native femoral head. Arthroplasty is generally reserved for older patients, over age 60, where attempts at ORIF in this setting have demonstrated failure rates over 40%. “Physiologic age” is a somewhat nebulous term that takes into account the health and ambulatory status of the patient. For example, a 52-year-old with end stage renal failure, severe osteoporosis, and a displaced femoral neck fracture may best be treated with arthroplasty. However, in reality, such situations are quite rare. Recent studies have documented that approximately 80% of young patients with displaced femoral neck fractures treated with ORIF will keep their own femoral head for 10 years after injury. The variables under the surgeon's control include timing of fixation, quality of reduction, accurate implant placement and implant selection, and capsulotomy. All of these variables potentially affect outcomes. Fractures in this young age group are frequently high shear angle (vertical) Pauwels Type 3 fractures, and benefit from fixed angle fixation. The author prefers anatomic reduction and stabilisation with a sliding hip screw and a superiorly placed derotation screw. Careful attention to detail is important to obtain an anatomic reduction, which is the most important variable in the outcome of these challenging injuries

Few will disagree that the best femoral head that a young patient can have is his or her own, native femoral head. In the active, healthy patient under age 60 with a displaced femoral neck fracture, well-done, timely ORIF presents the best chance of preserving the patient's native femoral head. Arthroplasty is generally reserved for older patients, over age 60, where attempts at ORIF in this setting have demonstrated failure rates over 40%. “Physiologic age” is a somewhat nebulous term that takes into account the health and ambulatory status of the patient. For example, a 52-year-old with end stage renal failure, severe osteoporosis, and a displaced femoral neck fracture may best be treated with arthroplasty. However, in reality, such situations are quite rare. Recent studies have documented that approximately 80% of young patients with displaced femoral neck fractures treated with ORIF will keep their own femoral head for 10 years after injury. The variables under the surgeon's control include timing of fixation, quality of reduction, accurate implant placement and implant selection, and capsulotomy. All of these variables potentially affect outcomes. Fractures in this young age group are frequently high shear angle (vertical) Pauwels type 3 fractures, and benefit from fixed angle fixation. The author prefers anatomic reduction and stabilization with a sliding hip screw and a superiorly placed derotation screw. Careful attention to detail is important to obtain an anatomic reduction, which is the most important variable in the outcome of these challenging injuries

Few will disagree that the best femoral head that a young patient can have is his or her own, native femoral head. In the active, healthy patient under age 60 with a displaced femoral neck fracture, well-done, timely ORIF presents the best chance of preserving the patient's native femoral head. Arthroplasty is generally reserved for older patients, over age 60, where attempts at ORIF in this setting have demonstrated failure rates over 40%. “Physiologic age” is a somewhat nebulous term that takes into account the health and ambulatory status of the patient. For example, a 52-year-old with end stage renal failure, severe osteoporosis, and a displaced femoral neck fracture may best be treated with arthroplasty. However, in reality, such situations are quite rare. Recent studies have documented that approximately 80% of young patients with displaced femoral neck fractures treated with ORIF will keep their own femoral head for 10 years after injury. The variables under the surgeon's control include timing of fixation, quality of reduction, accurate implant placement and implant selection, and capsulotomy. All of these variables potentially affect outcomes. Fractures in this young age group are frequently high shear angle (vertical) Pauwels type 3 fractures, and benefit from fixed angle fixation. The author prefers anatomic reduction and stabilization with a sliding hip screw and a superiorly placed derotation screw. Careful attention to detail is important to obtain an anatomic reduction, which is the most important variable in the outcome of these challenging injuries

Subcapital fractures about the hip continue to be a common clinical scenario with which we all face. There are estimated to be over 350,000 hip fractures annually in the U.S. with 40% being displaced femoral neck fractures. The mean cost is over $30,000. Optimizing surgical care is essential with the overall goal being to perform the most effective treatment with the lowest risk of reoperation that provides the best postoperative function and pain relief. In the “young” (which is often defined as whatever age is younger than you!) reduction and internal fixation is often the most effective retaining the native femoral head. The risk of non-union and AVN is often less than potential complications that can follow an arthroplasty with 40% of displaced fractures treated with ORIF eventually requiring reoperation. Essentially for every 100 patients that undergo ORIF for displaced femoral neck fracture, choosing arthroplasty instead results in 17 conversions avoided. In the “elderly” in general we treat all displaced fractures with a total hip replacement which reduced re-admissions and is more cost effective for displaced femoral neck fractures. Aside from the medical morbidity following an arthroplasty dislocation is the primary concern. We have found the anterolateral approach reduces this significantly. Non-displaced fractures that are valgus impacted and biomechanically stable are treated with cannulated screws. Perhaps it can be argued that a hemiarthroplasty (bipolar or monopolar) has a lower risk of dislocation compared to a total hip replacement if performed by a surgical team with less frequent total hip replacement experience. However, total hip replacement results in less pain and better function when the patients are independent with intact mental status (patient not the surgeon…!). My algorithm is non-displaced valgus impacted or “stable” fractures undergo cannulated screws and the displaced fractures receive a total hip arthroplasty via an anterolateral approach

Purpose. The optimal treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in patients over 60 years is controversial. While much research has focused on the impact of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) on surgical outcomes, little is known about patient preferences for either alternative. The purpose of this study was to elicit surgical preferences of patients at risk of sustaining hip fracture using a novel Decision board. Method. We developed a Decision board for the surgical management of displaced femoral neck fractures presenting risks and outcomes of HA and THA. The Decision board was presented to 81 elderly patients at risk for developing femoral neck fractures identified from an osteoporosis clinic. The participants were faced with the scenario of sustaining a displaced femoral neck fracture and were asked to state their treatment option preference and rationale for operative procedure. Results. Eighty-five percent (85%) of participants were between the age of 60 and 80 years; 89% were female; 88% were Caucasian; and 49% had some post-secondary education. Ninety-three percent (93%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 87% to 99%) of participants chose THA as their preferred operative choice. Participants identified several factors important to their decision, including the perception of greater walking distance (63%; CI, 52 to 74), less residual pain (29%; CI, 19 to 39), less reoperative risk (28%; CI, 18 to 38) and lower mortality risk (20%; CI, 11 to 29) with THA. Participants who preferred HA (7%; 95% CI, 1% to 13%) did so for perceived less invasiveness (50%; CI, 39 to 61), lower dislocation risk (33%; CI, 23 to 43), lower infection risk (33%; CI, 23 to 43), and shorter operative time (17%; CI, 9 to 25). Conclusion. The overwhelming majority of patients preferred THA to HA for the treatment of a displaced femoral neck fracture when confronted with risks and outcomes of both procedures on a decision board

Internal fixation remains the treatment of choice for non-displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients, whereas, arthroplasty is preferred for displaced fracture patterns. Given technological advancements in implant design and excellent long-term outcomes, arthroplasty may provide improved outcomes for the treatment of non-displaced femoral neck fractures. The aim of our study was to conduct a systematic review of the orthopaedic literature (1) to investigate the outcomes of internal fixation for the treatment of non-displaced and minimally displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients and (2) to compare the outcomes of patients treated with internal fixation to arthroplasty in this patient population. Relevant articles were identified using PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases. Manuscripts were included only if they contained (1) patients 60 years or older with (2) nondisplaced or minimally displaced (Garden I or II) femoral neck fractures (3) treated with internal fixation or arthroplasty or (4) separately reported outcomes in this patient population. The primary outcome was reoperation. Secondary outcomes included mortality, patient reported outcomes, length of hospital stay, infection, and transfusions. An a priori decision was made to classify studies into comparative or non-comparative groups. Comparative studies directly compared arthroplasty to internal fixation in the specific study population while the non-comparative studies included separate cohorts of patients treated with arthroplasty or internal fixation. A fixed-effects model was used to quantitatively pool study outcomes. Twenty-five non-comparative studies were identified with a total of 22,020 patients, all of which were treated with internal fixation. The pooled incidence of reoperation after internal fixation was 14.4% (95% CI: 10.8 – 18.8). The incidence of mortality within one-year of injury was 14.4% (95% CI: 6.7 – 28.3), based on the reporting in 14 studies. Three comparative studies were identified with a total of 360 patients (128 treated with arthroplasty and 232 treated with internal fixation). All three studies reported reoperation rates. The overall risk of reoperation was 3.1% in the arthroplasty group compared to 9.5% in the internal fixation group (relative risk: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10 – 0.84, p= 0.02). Only two studies reported mortality. The relative risk of mortality in patients treated with arthroplasty compared to internal fixation was 2.54 (95% CI: 1.38 – 4.70, p= 0.003). Internal fixation of minimally displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly is associated with a risk of reoperation and mortality that exceeds 14%. Treatment with arthroplasty may reduce the risk of reoperation by 70%. However, this benefit maybe tempered by a potential increased risk of mortality associated with arthroplasty in this patient population

Introduction. Prosthetic replacement remains the treatment of choice for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly population, with recent literature demonstrating significant functional benefits of total hip arthroplasty (THA) over hemiarthroplasty. Yet the fracture population also has historically high rates of early postoperative instability when treated with THA. The direct anterior approach (DAA) may offer the potential to decrease the risk of postoperative instability in this high-risk population by maintaining posterior anatomic structures. The addition of intraoperative fluoroscopy can improve precision in component placement and overcome limitations on preoperative planning due to poor preoperative radiographs performed in the emergency setting. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiographic outcomes of 113 consecutive patients with displaced femoral neck fractures treated by two surgeons over a five-year period. All underwent surgery via the DAA using fluoroscopic guidance, and were allowed immediate postoperative weight bearing without any hip precautions or restrictions. Charts were reviewed for relevant complications, while radiographs were reviewed for component positioning, sizing, and leg length discrepancy. Mean follow-up was 8.9 months. Results. Mean age was 79.3 years (range, 42 to 101), 73% of patients were women, and mean BMI was 22.6 kg/m. 2. Ninety patients (80%) received THA while 23 (20%) received unipolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Mean acetabular anteversion was 15.0 degrees (range, 4 to 24) and mean abduction was 39.2 degrees (range, 27 to 51) with 95% of acetabular components in the combined safe zone as described by Lewinnek. Mean radiographic leg-length difference was +2.2 mm (range, −4.9 to +8.8mm). There was no femoral stem subsidence of more than 2mm. Only one patient (0.9%) dislocated postoperatively, who was eventually constrained for recurrent posterior instability 3 months following surgery. Delayed wound healing (6.1%) was the most common postoperative complication. Conclusions. The direct anterior approach allows a safe, effective, and reproducible approach for treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures, with very low rate of early postoperative instability compared to historical controls. The use of intraoperative fluoroscopy allows excellent component positioning, sizing, and restoration of leg length in spite of inconsistent preoperative radiographs

Introduction. The treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients is under debate. Hemiarthroplasty is a recognised treatment for elderly patients with reduced capacity for mobilisation. Controversy exists around cemented or uncemented implants for hemiarthroplasty in this population. The aim of this study is to investigate outcomes of cemented vs uncemented hemiarthroplasty implants to two years post operation. Methods. All elderly patients presenting to one institution with a displaced subcapital neck of femur fracture were offered inclusion. One hundred and sixty patients (mean age, 85 years) with acute displaced femoral neck fractures were randomly allocated to be treated with cemented Exeter, or uncemented Zweymüller Alloclassic Hemiarthroplasty. Clinical and radiologic follow-up to two years with the main outcome measurements being pain, mortality, mobility, complications, reoperations, and quality of life using validated scores recorded by a blinded outcome assessor. Results. Complication rates were more frequent in uncemented implants (p< 0.016). Subsidence and perioperative fracture were significantly higher with uncemented components (p< 0.05). Visual analogue pain scores at rest were not significantly different between each group. Mortality rates were not significantly different at any time point. Oxford Hip scores at 6 weeks favoured cemented implants (p< 0.05). These trends persist but are not significant at later follow-up. Mobility measured by a timed up-and-go score favoured cemented at 6 weeks (p< 0.01), 6 months (p< 0.05) and 1 year (p< 0.005). A trend towards less dependence on walking aids also favoured cemented implants. Multifunctional assessment index and Mini-mental scores were similar in each group. Conclusion. Cemented hemiarthroplasty provides a better outcome for elderly patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture when compared with uncemented hemiarthroplasty. Complication rates were significantly lower and function and pain scores were improved at multiple time points following surgery

To properly care for femoral neck fractures, the surgeon must decide which fractures are to be fixed and which fractures will require a prosthesis. In addition, the type of prosthesis, hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty must be selected. Total hip arthroplasty is an option in the active elderly. The literature supports internal fixation in non-displaced fractures. Current literature supports the fact that ORIF of displaced femoral neck fractures results in failure and re-operation of 20% to 30%. By considering arthroplasty when the patient has multiple co-morbidities including renal disease, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis and severe osteoporosis the re-operation rate can be reduced significantly. The single most important factor in preventing failure with fixation is an anatomic reduction. A femoral neck fracture left in varus is doomed to failure and re-operation. A prosthesis should be used in most displaced femoral neck fractures in patients physiologically older than 65. In active elderly patients total hip replacement should be considered. In elderly patients with multiple co-morbidities who are relatively inactive in a nursing home or lower level community ambulators, a hemi-prosthesis should be considered. The decision-making process is always shared with the patient. When a prosthetic replacement is performed, the low level nursing home or community ambulator who is not expected to live longer than six to seven years is a candidate for a cemented hemi-arthroplasty. Studies report a 25% – 30% re-operation rate in hemi-arthroplasty if the patient survives greater than six to seven years. In the active elderly with little co-morbidity, a total hip replacement should be used. This is not only cost effective but provides the best pain relief of any of the options for treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures. Treatment of femoral neck fractures remains a challenge but the surgeon must select the proper treatment based on fracture displacement, physiologic age of the patient as well as co-morbidities of the patient

Few will disagree that the best femoral head that a young patient can have is his or her own, native femoral head. In the active, healthy patient under age 60 with a displaced femoral neck fracture, well-done, timely ORIF presents the best chance of preserving the patient's native femoral head. Arthroplasty is generally reserved for older patients, over age 60, where attempts at ORIF in this setting have demonstrated failure rates over 40%. Recent studies have documented that approximately 80% of young patients with displaced femoral neck fractures treated with ORIF will keep their own femoral head for 10 years after injury. The variables under the surgeon's control include timing of fixation, quality of reduction, accurate implant placement and implant selection, and capsulotomy. All of these variables potentially affect outcomes. Fractures in this young age group are frequently high shear angle (vertical) Pauwels type 3 fractures, and benefit from fixed angle fixation. The author prefers anatomic reduction and stabilization with a sliding hip screw and a superiorly placed derotation screw. Careful attention to detail is important to obtain an anatomic reduction, which is the most important variable in the outcome of these challenging injuries

Background. It is unclear whether the approach of hemiarthroplasty influence the outcomes in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the direct lateral approach (DL approach) and posterolateral approach (PL approach) for hemiarthroplasty. Methods. This study included patients presenting to our hospital with displaced femoral neck fractures (Garden stage 3 or 4) from August 2010 to August 2011. 59 patients agreed the prospective study. They were randomized between the hemiarthroplasty using DL approach or PL approach. We evaluated and compared the operative time, perioperative blood loss, peri- and post-operative complications, and 5-year survival rates. Results. Thirty-two patients underwent the hemiarthroplasty using DL approach and 27 patients underwent hemiarthroplasty using PL approach. The mean operative time was 91 min in DL group and 77 min in PL group. A significant difference was observed for the mean operative times(p<0.005). The bleeding during surgery was 194 g in DL group and 180 g in PL group. The postoperative blood loss was 268 g in DL group and 264 g in PL group, no significant difference was observed postoperatively. Perioperative and postoperative complications were observed in 8 patients of DL group and 5 patients of the PL group. In DL group, perioperative complications included fracture in 1 patient, whereas postoperative complications included deep vein thrombosis in 7 patients. In PL group, postoperative complications included deep vein thrombosis in 3 patients, deep infection in 1 patient and subluxation of the outerhead in 1 patient. Two patients of DL group and 3patients of PL group suffered second hip fractures within the follow-up period, and 1 patient of PL group suffered periprosthetic fracture and treated conservatively. We identified 28 patients as dead in the follow-up period. The 5-year survival rate of DL group was 51.3% and that of PL group was 44.2%; there were not significantly different between the groups (log-rank test, p = 0.324). Conclusion. The mean operative time was significantly longer in DL groups, but peri- and post-operative complications and the surbival rate were not significantly different between the two groups. Surgical approach might not affect the outcomes of hemiarthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fractures

Few will disagree that the best femoral head that a young patient can have is his or her own, native femoral head. In the active, healthy patient under age 60 with a displaced femoral neck fracture, well-done, timely ORIF presents the best chance of preserving the patient's native femoral head. Arthroplasty is generally reserved for older patients, over age 60, where attempts at ORIF in this setting have demonstrated failure rates over 40%. Recent studies have documented that approximately 80% of young patients with displaced femoral neck fractures treated with ORIF will keep their own femoral head for 10 years after injury. The variables under the surgeon's control include timing of fixation, quality of reduction, accurate implant placement and implant selection, and capsulotomy. All of these variables potentially affect outcomes. Fractures in this young age group are frequently high shear angle (vertical) Pauwels type 3 fractures, and benefit from fixed angle fixation. The author prefers anatomic reduction and stabilization with a sliding hip screw and a superiorly placed derotation screw. Careful attention to detail is important to obtain an anatomic reduction, which is the most important variable in the outcome of these challenging injuries

BACKGROUND. Ideal treatment of displaced femoral neck fragility fractures in the previously ambulatory patient remains controversial. Treating these patients with total hip arthroplasty has improved patient reported outcomes and reduced rates of revision surgery compared to those treated with hemiarthroplasty. However, possible increased risk of dislocation remains a concern with total hip arthroplasty. The anterolateral and direct anterior approaches to total hip replacement have been applied in the femoral neck fracture population to minimize dislocation rates. However, the anterolateral approach has been associated with abductor injury and increased rates of heterotopic ossification while the anterior approach has been associated with peri-prosthetic femur fracture, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury, and wound complications. The Supercapsular Percutaneously Assisted (SuperPATH) approach was developed to minimize disruption of the capsule and short-external rotators in an effort to reduce the risk of dislocation and assist in quicker recovery in the elective hip arthroplasty setting. To achieve this, the SuperPATH technique allows the femur to be prepared in situ and the acetabulum to be reamed percutaneously once the femoral head is removed. This study investigates the post-operative time to ambulation, length of stay, discharge destination, and early dislocation rate of previously ambulatory patients with a displaced femoral neck fragility fracture that were treated with a total hip arthroplasty via the SuperPATH technique. METHODS. A retrospective chart review was performed of previously ambulatory patients consecutively treated for a displaced femoral neck fragility fracture with a total hip replacement using the SuperPATH technique. Thirty-five patients were included in the study and examined for demographic data, time to ambulation, length of stay, major and minor complications during their hospital stay. Phone interviews were conducted to check for dislocation events. RESULTS. Thirty-five patients were included in the study with an average age of 75.7 years old (range 51–95). Patients spent an average of 5.35 ± 1.61 days in the hospital and were discharged on post-operative day 3.6 ±1.38. 89% of patients were able to stand and ambulate by post-operative day 1, and 97% of patients were able to stand and ambulate before discharge from the hospital. 26% of patients were able to be discharged home, 46% were discharged to in-patient rehabilitation, 23% were discharged to a skilled nursing facility, and one patient was discharged to hospice. There were no iatrogenic femoral fractures caused, no incidents of symptomatic heterotopic bone formation, and no superficial or deep wound infections. 88.5% of patients had adequate follow up averaging 370.6 ±235.18 days, with no dislocation events observed. CONCLUSION. These early results indicate that minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty utilizing the SuperPATH technique is a safe and effective treatment for displaced femoral neck fragility fractures in the previously ambulatory patient. Additionally, this technique allows for early ambulation without an increased risk of dislocation

Introduction. Femoral neck fracture is a common injury in elderly patients. To restore the activity with an acceptable morbidity and to decrease of mortality, surgical procedures are thought to be superior to conservative treatments. Osteosynthesis with internal fixation for nondisplaced type, and hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement (hip arthroplasties) for displaced type are commonly performed. Cemented arthroplasty has been preferred over non-cemented arthroplasty because of less postoperative pain, better mobility and excellent initial fixation of the implant, especially for osteoporotic and stove-pipe bones. However, pressurizing bone cement may cause cardiorespiratory and vascular complications, and occasionally death, which has been termed as “bone cement implantation syndrome”. To avoid the occurrence of this syndrome, non-cemented implants have been developed. However, most implants with the press fit concepts and flat wedge taper designs have a risk of intraoperative and early postoperative periprosthetic fracture. Recently, we have employed a non-cemented femoral component, which has a lateral expansion to the proximal body as compared to a conventional hip stem. Because of this shape, which is called a “lateral flare”, this stem provides a physiological loading on both the medial and lateral endosteal surfaces of the femur. This is in contrast to conventional hip stem which prioritizes loading on the medial and metaphyseal /dyaphyseal surfaces of the femur. Moreover, the cross section of this stem is trapezoid with the flat posterior surface. This shape provides the stem with rotational stability along the long axis of the femur, and maximizes loading transfer to the posterior aspect of the proximal femur. These mechanical features avoid the need for aggressive impaction of the stem at the time of insertion. It is necessary to only tap gently to achieve the secure initial implant fixation by a “rest fit”. Thus, this technique reduces the risk of fracture. Patients and methods. We employed this technique using a non-cemented lateral flare design device for displaced femoral neck fractures since 1996. Surgical procedures were performed with posterior approach under the spinal or epidural anesthesia. Full weight bearing ambulation with a walker was allowed on post-op day one. Results and discussion. Since that time, we have had no femoral fracture, no dislocation of the hip, nor severe complications intraoperatively and post operatively. There has been no evidence of radiographic aseptic loosening or axial migration of the stems during this time period. Conclusions. “Rest fit” surgical technique avoids complications associated with cemented and traditional non-cemented arthroplasties for displaced femoral neck fractures. It however requires specific geometric features to be included the designs of the femoral component to assure secure initiate fixation at the time of arthroplasty. Therefore, this lateral flare implants are effective for the treatment of the displaced type of femoral neck fracture

Purpose. Hip arthroplasty is a good treatment option for displaced femoral neck fracture in elderly patients. However, neuromuscular disease such as cerebral infarction or hemorrhage can be a concerning problem for THA since dislocation after operation can frequently occur. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the functional results of modified minimally invasive (MI) two-incision total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the use of large-diameter (>38mm) metal-on-metal articulation in patients with muscle weakness. Patients and Methods. 19 consecutive patients (19 hips) with displaced femoral neck fracture with muscle weakness were enrolled. There were 11 patients with cerebral infarction, 4 patients with cerebral hemorrhage and 4 patients with Parkinson's disease. In the lateral position, an anterolateral approach between the gluteus medius and tensor fascia lata and a posterior approach between the piriformis and gluteus medius were used. Surgical morbidity, functional recovery, radiological implantation properties, range of motion (ROM) and complications were assessed. Results. The mean operation time was 73.5 minutes and the average perioperative blood loss was 725.9cc. The mean head diameter used was 44 mm (38–50). The mean lateral opening angle of the acetabular component was 38.4°, the mean anteversion of the acetabular component was 16.4°, and the mean stem position was 0.3° valgus. The average postoperative ambulation time was 2.4 days. The mean Harris hip score was 81.0 at final follow-up, and the mean WOMAC score was 42.9. At final follow-up, there was no case of dislocation. There was no hypersensitivity, no osteolysis, and no revision. Conclusions. Our study suggests that the functional results of modified MI two-incision THA with the use of large-diameter metal on metal articulation in patients with muscle weakness can produce satisfactory early functional recovery and can reduce the dislocation rate

Recent NICE guidelines suggest that Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) be offered to all patients with a displaced intracapsular neck of femur fracture who: are able to walk independently; not cognitively impaired and are medically fit for the anaesthesia and procedure. This is likely to have significant logistical implications for individual departments. Data from the National Hip Fracture Database was analysed retrospectively between January 2009 and November 2011. The aim was to determine if patients with displaced intracapsular neck of femur fractures admitted to a single tertiary referral orthopaedic trauma unit received a THA if they met NICE criteria. Case notes were then reviewed to obtain outcome and complication rates after surgery. Five hundred and forty-six patients were admitted with a displaced intracapsular neck of femur fracture over the described time period. Sixty-five patients met the NICE criteria to receive a THA (mean age 74 years, M:F = 16: 49); however, 21 patients had a THA. The other patients received either a cemented Thompson or bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Within the THA cohort there were no episodes of dislocation, venous thromboembolism, significant wound complications or infections that required further surgery. Within the hemiarthroplasty cohort there was 2 mortalities, 2 implant related infections, 1 dislocation and 2 required revision to a THA. There is evidence to suggest better outcomes in this cohort of patients, in terms pain and function. There is also a forecasted cost saving for departments, largely due to the relative reduction in complications. However, there were many cases (44) in our department, which would have been eligible for a THA, according to the NICE guidelines, who received a hemiarthroplasty. This is likely a reflection of the increased technical demand, and larger logistical difficulties faced by the department. We did note more complications within the hemiarthroplasty group, however, the numbers are too small to address statistical significance, and a longer follow up would be needed to further evaluate this. There is a clear scope for optimisation and improvement of infrastructure to develop time and resources to cope with the increased demand for THA for displaced intracapsular neck of femur fractures, in order to closely adhere to the NICE guidelines