Aims. The aim of this study was to determine the immediate post-fixation stability of a distal tibial fracture fixed with an intramedullary nail using a biomechanical model. This was used as a surrogate for immediate weight-bearing postoperatively. The goal was to help inform postoperative protocols. Methods. A biomechanical model of distal metaphyseal tibial fractures was created using a fourth-generation composite bone model. Three fracture patterns were tested: spiral, oblique, and multifragmented. Each fracture extended to within 4 cm to 5 cm of the plafond. The models were nearly-anatomically reduced and stabilized with an intramedullary nail and three distal locking screws. Cyclic loading was performed to simulate normal gait. Loading was completed in compression at 3,000 N at 1 Hz for a total of 70,000 cycles. Displacement (shortening, coronal and sagittal angulation) was measured at regular intervals. Results. The spiral and oblique fracture patterns withstood simulated weight-bearing with minimal displacement. The multifragmented model had early implant failure with breaking of the distal locking screws. The spiral fracture model shortened by a mean of 0.3 mm (SD 0.2), and developed a mean coronal angulation of 2.0° (SD 1.9°) and a mean sagittal angulation of 1.2° (SD 1.1°). On average, 88% of the shortening, 74% of the change in coronal alignment, and 75% of the change in sagittal alignment occurred in the first 2,500 cycles. No late acceleration of displacement was noted. The oblique fracture model shortened by a mean of 0.2 mm (SD 0.1) and developed a mean coronal angulation of 2.4° (SD 1.6°) and a mean sagittal angulation of 2.6° (SD 1.4°). On average, 44% of the shortening, 39% of the change in coronal alignment, and 79% of the change in sagittal alignment occurred in the first 2,500 cycles. No late acceleration of displacement was noted. Conclusion. For spiral and oblique fracture patterns, simulated weight-bearing resulted in a clinically acceptable degree of displacement. Most displacement occurred early in the test period, and the rate of displacement decreased over time. Based on this model, we offer evidence that early weight-bearing appears safe for well reduced oblique and spiral fractures, but not in multifragmented patterns that have poor bone contact. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):294–298

Introduction. Distal tibial fractures are notoriously difficult to treat and a lack of consensus remains on the best approach. This study examined clinical and functional outcomes in such patients treated definitively by circular external fixation (Ilizarov). Patients and Methods: Between July 2011 and May 2016, patients with fractures extending to within 1 muller square of the ankle were identified from our prospective Ilizarov database. Existing data was supplemented by review of clinical records. Fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA classification. Functional outcome data, including general measures of health related quality of life (SF-12 and Euroqol) and limb specific scores (Olerud and Molander Score and Lysholm scores) had been routinely collected for part of the study period. Patients in whom this had not been collected were asked to complete these by post. Adverse events were documented according to Paley's classification of: problems, obstacles and complications. Results. 142 patients with 143 fractures were identified, 40 (28%) were open, 94 (66%) were intra-articular, 85 (59%) were tertiary referrals. 32% were type 1, 28%, type 2 and 40% type 3 AO/OTA severity. 139 (97%) of the fractures united (2 non-unions, 1 amputation and 2 delayed unions who remain in frames), at a median of 165 days (range 104 to 429, IQR 136 to 201). 62% united by 6 months, 87% by 9 months and 94% by 1 year. Both non-unions have united with further treatment. Closed fractures united more rapidly than open (median 157 vs 185 days; p=0.003) and true Pilon (43C3) fractures took longer to unite other fractures (median 156 vs 190 days; p<0.001). 34% of patients encountered a problem, 12% an obstacle and 10% a complication. Of the complications, 6 (4%) were minor, 5 (3.5%) major not interfering with the goals of treatment and 4 (3%) major interfering with treatment goals (including the 2 patients with non-union and 1 who underwent amputation as well as 1 significant mal-union). This will increase to 4% if the 2 delayed unions fail to unite. Overall 56% reported good or excellent ankle scores at last report, 28% fair and 16% poor. Closed, extra-articular and non-43C3 fractures had better functional outcome scores than open, intra-articular and 43C3 fractures respectively. Conclusions. This study demonstrates a high union and low serious complication rate, suggesting that external ring fixation is a safe and effective treatment for these injuries. *Judged best paper*

Aims. To report the outcomes of patients with a fracture of the distal tibia who were treated with intramedullary nail versus locking plate in the five years after participating in the Fixation of Distal Tibia fracture (FixDT) trial. Methods. The FixDT trial reported the results for 321 patients randomized to nail or locking plate fixation in the first 12 months after their injury. In this follow-up study, we report the results of 170 of the original participants who agreed to be followed up until five years. Participants reported their Disability Rating Index (DRI) and health-related quality of life (EuroQol five-dimension three-level questionnaire) annually by self-reported questionnaire. Further surgical interventions related to the fracture were also recorded. Results. There was no evidence of a difference in patient-reported disability, health-related quality of life, or the need for further surgery between participants treated with either type of fixation at five years. Considering the combined results for all participants, there was no significant change in DRI scores after the first 12 months of follow-up (difference between 12 and 24 months, 3.3 (95% confidence interval -1.8 to 8.5); p = 0.203), with patients reporting around 20% disability at five years. Conclusion. This study shows that the moderate levels of disability and reduced quality of life reported by participants 12 months after a fracture of the distal tibia persist in the medium term, with little evidence of improvement after the first year. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(7):795–800

The surgical care of extra-articular distal tibial fractures remains controversial. This study looks at the radiological outcomes of distal tibial fractures treated with either a direct medial or anterolateral plate, with or without plating of the fibula, to assess the outcome and complications associated with these 2 approaches. This is a retrospective review of 80 patients with distal tibial extra-articular fractures, treated with an open reduction and plating, between 2008 and 2019 at Glasgow Royal Infirmary. Case notes and x-rays were reviewed. Of those tibial fractures fixed with only a medial plate, 78% united (28/36), 5% (2/36) had a non-union and 17% (6/36) a malunion. In the group treated with a combination of medial tibial and fibular plating, the figures were; 71% (15/21), 19% (4/21) and 10% (2/21). However, in the group treated with anterolateral plating of the tibia alone, only 53% (8/15) united, with a 20% (3/15) non-union and 13% (2/15) malunion rate. Additionally in this group, there were 2 patients (13%) with loss of fracture reduction within the first two months of fracture fixation, requiring revision surgery. Interestingly, of the 8 patients treated with anterolateral tibial and fibular plating, 88% (7/8) showed full union and only one (12%) had a non-union, with no malunions is this group. It would appear that medial tibial and a combination of medial tibial and fibular plating, have superior outcomes compared to anterolateral plating. Results suggest, if anterolateral plating is done, this should be augmented by fixation of the fibular fracture as well

Introduction. Fractures of the distal tibia can be challenging to manage. Numerous surgical techniques have been utilised in managing these however there remains debate as to the optimum method of fixation. This study aims to assess the surgical outcomes and PROMs of patients with distal tibial fractures managed with intramedullary-nails or ring fixation. Methods. This is a retrospective study of patients with closed distal tibial fractures managed between 01/01/2013–31/12/2016. Adult patients admitted with closed fracture of the distal tibia fixed with an intramedullary-nail or circular-frame were included in the study. Primary outcomes were time of union, alignment of tibia post-operatively and the results of two validated PROMs (Kujala knee score and Olerud and Molander Ankle Score). Results. 12 patients had circular-frame and 14 patients underwent intramedullary-nailing. PROMS were completed in 9 (75%) of the frame group and 7 (50%) of the nail group. There was no statistically significant difference in age (p=0.095); no statistically significant difference in time to union (medians = frame 29.7 weeks, IM nail 24 weeks, p=0.212); no statistically significant difference in the coronal angulation difference from neutral (medians = frame 1.9 degrees, IM nail 2.0 degrees, p=0.940). There was statistically significant difference in sagittal angulation difference from neutral (Medians = frame 3 degrees, IM nail 0.6 degrees, p=0.041); the proportion of males in the frames groups was statistically significantly higher (p=0.033). There was no statistically significant difference in outcome of ankle scores (medians = frame 92.5, IM nail 75, p=0.132); there was a statistically significant difference in the knee score favouring the frame group (medians = frame 99, IM nail 74.5, p=0.041). Discussion. Our results show distal tibia fractures can be treated with circular-frames or IM-nails. Patients at high-risk of soft tissue complication or to minimise the risk of knee symptoms should be considered for a circular-frame

Background. In a systematic review of 1125 distal tibia fractures treated with an intramedullary nail, the reported incidence of malalignment was 14%. The purpose of our study is to assess whether the addition of blocking screws during intramedullary nailing of a distal tibia fracture improved radiological outcomes. As a secondary outcome, the time to radiographic union was compared to see if a more rigid bone-implant construct had an effect on healing. Methods. We searched computerised records at a UK level 1 major trauma centre. The joint alignment was measured on the immediate post-operative radiograph and compared to the most recent radiograph. We used a difference of 2 degrees to indicate a progressive deformity and a RUST score greater or equal to 10, to indicate radiographic fracture union. Results. Twenty-seven patients were included. Nineteen patients had no blocking screw and 8 patients had a blocking screw. Five patients had a difference in their coronal plane alignment of 2 degrees or more (3/5 had no blocking screw). The results were analysed and found to be not statistically significant (p=0.88). The addition of a blocking screw has also been shown not to have an effect on the time to union. Conclusion. We have changed our surgical practice. We use a 2.5mm blocking wire to aid in fracture reduction prior to reaming / nail insertion and then remove the wire when the nail has been adequately locked. Implications. This could save surgical procedure time, radiation exposure for the patient, implant costs and potential complications

Introduction. Our unit has extensive experience with the use of Ilizarov circular frames for acute fracture and nonunion surgery. We have observed and analysed fracture healing patterns which question the role of relative stability in fracture healing and we offer limb mechanical axis restoration as a more important determinant. Aim. To assess for the presence of external callus, when only relative stability has been achieved but with anatomical restoration of the mechanical axis (ARMA). Methods. We retrospectively reviewed diametaphyseal proximal and distal tibial fractures treated with Ilizarov frame fixation in our unit between 2009 and 2017. We also reviewed cases where the Ilizarov frame technique had been used for complex femoral and humeral non-unions. Radiographs in 4 views were reviewed to assess bone healing, the presence of external callus and correction of lower limb mechanical axis. Results. 45 tibial plateau fractures, 42 distal tibial fractures and 20 humeral and 3 femoral non-unions were reviewed. Where ARMA was achieved, bone healing was observed to occur without external callus. ARMA proved more challenging in the distal tibia and where ARMA was not achieved external callus was visible during fracture healing. Conclusion. ARMA bone healing is reliable and occurs without formation of external callus, despite relative stability. This would suggest that external callus is produced not in response to just the magnitude of strain but also the direction of strain. Restoration of the mechanical axis is an important step in achieving union and needs to be considered when fixing fractures or treating non-unions

Methods:. Total radiation exposure accumulated during circular frame treatment of distal tibial fractures was quantified in 47 patients treated by a single surgeon from March 2011 until Nov 2014. The radiation exposures for all relevant radiology procedures for the distal tibial injury were included to estimate the radiation risk to the patient. Results:. The median time of treatment in the frame was 169 days (range 105 – 368 days). Patients underwent a median of 13 sets of plain radiographs; at least one intra operative exposure and 16 patients underwent CT scanning. The median total effective dose per patient from time of injury to discharge was 0.025 mSv (interquartile range 0.013 – 0.162 and minimum to maximum 0.01–0.53). CT scanning is the only variable shown to be an independent predictor of cumulative radiation dose on multivariate analysis, with a 13 fold increase in overall exposure. Conclusion:. Radiation exposure during treatment of distal tibial fractures with a circular frame in this group was well within reasonably safe limits. CT was the only significant predictor of overall exposure serves as a reminder to individually assess the risk and utility of radiological investigations on an individual basis. This is consistent with the UK legal requirements (Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2000. 1. )

Background. Distal tibial metaphyseal fractures pose many complexities. This study assessed the outcomes of distal tibial fractures treated with percutaneously inserted medial locking plates. Methods. Eighteen patients were selected based on the fracture pattern and classified using the AO classification and stabilised with an AO medial tibial locking plate. Time to fracture union, complications and outcomes were assessed with the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle score at 12 months. Results. Sixteen of the 18 patients achieved fracture union, with 1 patient lost to follow up. Twelve fractures united within 24 weeks, with an average union time of 23.1 weeks. Three delayed unions, two at 28 weeks and one at 56 weeks. The average time to union was 32 weeks in the smokers and 15.3 weeks in the non-smokers. Five of the 18 patients (27%) developed complications. One superficial wound infection and one chronic wound infection, resulting in non-union at 56 weeks, requiring revision. Two patients required plate removal, one after sustaining an open fracture at the proximal end of the plate 6 months after surgery (post fracture union) and the other for painful hardware. One patient had implant failure of three proximal diaphyseal locking screws at the screw head/neck junction, but successful fracture union. The average AOFAS ankle score was 88.8 overall, and 92.1 in fractures that united within 24 weeks. Conclusions. Distal tibial locking plates have high fracture union rates, minimum soft tissue complications, and good functional outcomes. The literature shows similar fracture union and complication rates in locking and non-locking plates

Aims

The study objective was to prospectively assess clinical outcomes for a pilot cohort of tibial shaft fractures treated with a new tibial nailing system that produces controlled axial interfragmentary micromotion. The hypothesis was that axial micromotion enhances fracture healing compared to static interlocking.

Aim

The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of intramedullary nail fixation and ‘locking’ plate fixation in the treatment of extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia.

We compared the outcome of closed intramedullary nailing with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using a percutaneous locked compression plate in patients with a distal metaphyseal fracture in a prospective study.

A total of 85 patients were randomised to operative stabilisation either by a closed intramedullary nail (44) or by minimally invasive osteosynthesis with a compression plate (41). Pre-operative variables included the patients’ age and the side and pattern of the fracture. Peri-operative variables were the operating time and the radiation time. Postoperative variables were wound problems, the time to union of the fracture, the functional American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle surgery score and removal of hardware.

We found no significant difference in the pre-operative variables or in the time to union in the two groups. However, the mean radiation time and operating time were significantly longer in the locked compression plate group (3.0 vs 2.12 minutes, p < 0.001, and 97.9 vs 81.2 minutes, p < 0.001, respectively). After one year, all the fractures had united. Patients who had intramedullary nailing had a higher mean pain score, but better function, alignment and total American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle surgery scores, although the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.234, p = 0.157, p = 0.897, p = 0.177 respectively). Three (6.8%) patients in the intramedullary nailing group and six (14.6%) in the locked compression plate group showed delayed wound healing, and 37 (84.1%) in the former group and 38 (92.7%) in the latter group expressed a wish to have the implant removed.

We conclude that both closed intramedullary nailing and a percutaneous locked compression plate can be used safely to treat Orthopaedic Trauma Association type-43A distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia. However, closed intramedullary nailing has the advantage of a shorter operating and radiation time and easier removal of the implant. We therefore prefer closed intramedullary nailing for patients with these fractures.

Using human cadaver specimens, we investigated the role of supplementary fibular plating in the treatment of distal tibial fractures using an intramedullary nail. Fibular plating is thought to improve stability in these situations, but has been reported to have increased soft-tissue complications and to impair union of the fracture. We proposed that multidirectional locking screws provide adequate stability, making additional fibular plating unnecessary. A distal tibiofibular osteotomy model performed on matched fresh-frozen lower limb specimens was stabilised with reamed nails using conventional biplanar distal locking (CDL) or multidirectional distal locking (MDL) options with and without fibular plating. Rotational stiffness was assessed under a constant axial force of 150 N and a superimposed torque of ± 5 Nm. Total movement, and neutral zone and fracture gap movement were analysed.

In the CDL group, fibular plating improved stiffness at the tibial fracture site, albeit to a small degree (p = 0.013). In the MDL group additional fibular plating did not increase the stiffness. The MDL nail without fibular plating was significantly more stable than the CDL nail with an additional fibular plate (p = 0.008).

These findings suggest that additional fibular plating does not improve stability if a multidirectional distal locking intramedullary nail is used, and is therefore unnecessary if not needed to aid reduction.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:385–9.

We reviewed 27 diabetic patients who sustained a tibial fracture treated with a reamed intramedullary nail and compared them with a control group who did not have diabetes. There were 23 closed fractures and four were open. Union was delayed until after six months in 12 of the 23 (52%) diabetic patients with closed fractures and ten of the 23 (43%) control patients (p = 0.768). In two patients with diabetes (9%), closed tibial fractures failed to unite and required exchange nailing, whereas all closed fractures in the control group healed without further surgery (p = 0.489). In both the diabetic and control groups with closed fractures two patients (9%) developed superficial infections. There were two (9%) deep infections in diabetic patients with closed fractures, but none in the control group (p = 0.489).

Overall, there was no significant difference in the rate of complications between the diabetic patients and the control group, but there was a tendency for more severe infections in patients with diabetes.

We have managed 21 patients with a fracture of the tibia complicated by bone and soft-tissue loss as a result of an open fracture in 10, or following debridement of an infected nonunion in 11, by resection of all the devitalised tissues, acute limb shortening to close the defect, application of an external fixator and metaphyseal osteotomy for re-lengthening. The mean bone loss was 4.7 cm (3 to 11). The mean age of the patients was 28.8 years (12 to 54) and the mean follow-up was 34.8 months (24 to 75).

All the fractures united with a well-aligned limb. The mean duration of treatment for the ten grade-III A+B open fractures (according to the Gustilo-Anderson classification) was 5.7 months (4.5 to 8) and for the nonunions, 7.6 months (5.5 to 12.5). Complications included one refracture, one transient palsy of the peroneal nerve and one equinus contracture of 10°.