A Morel-Lavallee lesion (MLL) is a benign cystic lesion that occurs due to injury to the soft-tissue envelope's perforating vascular and lymphatic systems, resulting in a distinctive hemolymphatic fluid accumulation between the tissue layers. The MLL has the potential to make a significant impact on the treatment of orthopaedic injuries.

A 79-year-old male patient community ambulatory with assisting aid (cane) known case of Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, bronchial asthma and ischemic heart disease. He was brought to the Emergency, complaining of right hip discomfort and burning sensation for the last 5 days with no history of recent trauma at all. Patient had history of right trochanteric femur fracture 3 years ago, treated with DHS in a privet service. Clinical and Radiological assessment showed that the patient mostly has acute MLL due to lag screw cut out. We offered the patient the surgical intervention, but he refused despite explaining the risks of complications if not treated and preferred to receive the conservative treatment. Compression therapy management explained to him including biker's shorts (instructed to be worn full-time a day) and regular follow up in clinic. Symptom's improvement was reported by the patient in the subsequent visits.

In the polytrauma patient, a delayed diagnosis of these lesions is conceivable due to the presence of more visible injuries. It's located over the greater trochanter more commonly, but sometimes in other areas such as the lower lumbar region, the thigh, or the calf. Incorrect or delayed diagnosis and care can have unfavorable outcomes such as infection, pseudocyst development, and cosmetologically deformity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound will aid in MLL diagnosis. However, the effectiveness of MLL therapy remains debatable.

We strongly believe that the MLL caused due to tangential shear forces applied to the soft tissue leads to accumulation of the blood and/or lymph between the subcutaneous and overlying fascia and it often misdiagnosed due to other distracting injuries. Nontheless, in our case we reported MLL occur due to internal pressure on the fascia caused by cut out of DHS lag screw.

The aim of this study is to analyse the radiological outcomes and predictors of avascular necrosis following 2-hole DHS in Garden I and II neck of femur fractures in patients more than 60 years with a minimum follow up of one year.

We retrospectively reviewed 51 consecutive patients aged more than 60 years who underwent DHS fixation for Garden I and II fractures. Demographics, fracture classification, time to surgery, pre-operative AMTS, preoperative posterior tilt angle, quality of reduction, pre and post-operative haemoglobin(hb), creatinine and comorbidities were analysed for correlation with AVN using Chi-Square test, Independent Sample and paired t test.

There were 40 (78.4%) females and the mean age of the cohort was 77 years. 28 and 23 were Garden I and II NOF fractures respectively. Union was observed in all our patients except one(kappa =1). 12/51(23.5%) developed AVN of the femoral head. Statistically significant higher incidence of AVN was noted in patients with a pre-op tilt angle > 200 (p = 0.006). The mean drop in Hb was higher in patients who developed AVN (21.5 g/L) versus the non-AVN group (15.9 g/L) (p = 0.001). There was no difference in AVN rates with respect to laterality, mean time to surgery, pre-op AMTS and Charlson comorbidity index. 4/52 (7.6%) had re-operations (one hardware prominence, two conversions to arthroplasty, one fixation failure during the immediate post-op period). The 30-day and one year mortality rates were 1.9 % and 11.7 % respectively.

2-hole DHS fixation in undisplaced NOF fractures has excellent union rates. A pre-operative posterior tilt angle of >200 and a greater difference in pre and post operative haemoglobin were found to correlate positively with the progression to AVN . No correlation was observed between AVN and time to surgery, laterality, quality of reduction and comorbidities.

Abstract

Introduction Intertrochanteric fractures are common and represent a major source of morbidity and mortality. As with all orthopaedic implants a DHS can fail. One of the most important predictors of failure has been shown to be the Tip-Apex Distance (TAD). An audit was carried to assess the following:

What was our rate of cut out and implant failure?

Methods An audit of the case notes and x-rays of 54 consecutive patients with hip fractures, treated with DHS, within a twelve-month period were reviewed. Demographic data, grade of surgeon, fracture stability, DHS position, mortality and implant failure were assessed.

Findings Our rate of failure was 2 out of 54 patients, 3.7%. Both of the patients that failed had a TAD of greater than 20mm, and none of the patients with a TAD below 20mm required further surgery. There was no statistical correlation between TAD and grade of operating surgeon.

Recommendations It is paramount importance to ensure that the basic principles of DHS position are well taught to surgical trainees in order to reduce the risk of failure. Following DHS fixation, patients should be followed up for a minimum of 3 months until evidence of radiographic union is evident. DHS failure rates and screw positions should be constantly audited to ensure that failure rates are minimised.

Purpose of the study: To compare the DHS plate fixation with the Targon PF nail for the treatment of intratro-chanteric fractures.

Material and methods: This was a prospective randomized study including 60 patients hospitalized in the emergency setting between December 2003 and June 2004for intratrochanteric fractures. The AO classification was used. We analyzed: patient status (ASA), operative time (type of implant, duration), the postoperative period (blood loss, radiologic findings, duration of hospital stay, early postoperative complications) and at last follow-up, Harris hip score, date of resumed walking, mortality. Patients were assessed at three months postop. This study included 60 patients, 34 with a Targon PF nail and 26 with a DHS. Mean patient age for nailing was 81 years (SD 12.8, range 23–86); for DHS it was 82 years (SD 9.8; range 47–97).

Results: Mean blood loss was 410 ml with the Targon PF nail and 325 ml with the DHS, a nearly significant difference (p=0.07). The other results did not demonstrate any significant difference. At three months five cases of screw cut out were noted. Bone healing was achieved in all cases. The Trargon PF nail and the DHS provide equivalent results, with less bleeding an lesser cost for the DHS.

Introduction: The main problem using first generation Gamma-nail in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures has been a high frequency of intra- and postoperative femoral fractures. The TGN was thought to represent an improvement in design and potentially a less invasive treatment.

Material and methods: 146 fractures were randomised prospectively to either DHS or TGN. The 2 groups were comparable regarding age, gender and fracture type (AO). Follow-up was carried out after 4 and 12 months.

Results: Average operation time in the TGN group was 63 min (SD=30min) and 48 min (SD=23) in the DHS group (p=0.0016). There was no difference in intra-operative blood loss, need for blood transfusion, length of hospital stay or mortality. Two femoral fractures occurred postoperatively in the TGN group. At follow-up 12 patients in the TGN and 6 patients in the DHS group had had a reoperation (p> 0.05). Six reoperations in the TGN group and 3 in the DHS group resulted in preservation of the hip joint. The remaining patients had an arthroplasty or a Girdlestone resection. Poor reduction and/or positioning of the implant was significantly correlated to the risk of reoperation (p< 0.001). Specific technical errors could be identified among 3 fractures in the TGN group leading to reoperation. Any correlation between fracture type and reoperation could not be demonstrated.

Conclusion: In this study operation time was significantly longer in the TGN group. Among other variables no significant differences could be demonstrated. In our department, with a high number of residents performing these operations, the DHS will continue to be the standard implant. Whether the TGN has a place in a subgroup of intertrochanteric fractures, operated by specialized surgeons, needs further investigation.

Background: A radiological audit of the local use of the Dynamic Hip Screw in extracapsular proximal femur fractures. Study aim: to identify cases of mechanical failure and revision, to determine predictors of fixation failure.

Methods: A retrospective radiological review of 567 consecutive cases at Western Australian tertiary hospitals over a 3 year period (2002 – 2004) using the Picture Archive Computer System (PACS).

Results: Female: male ratio was 2.79: 1. Evan’s classification: 418 fractures stable (73.7%), 149 unstable (26.3%). Failure of fixation occurred in 14 cases (2.5%); ten due to hip screw cut out (1.8%) and four due to plate pull off (0.8%). All cases of cut out had a significantly higher mean tip apex distance (TAD) (31 vs 20mm, P < 0.001) and an unstable fracture configuration; 8 of 10 had a poor reduction. Bivariate logistical regression revealed TAD of 25mm or more to be most predictive of cut out; followed by mean TAD, superior anterior and inferior posterior screw placement, unstable fracture configuration and poor reduction. Unassociated factors included gender, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists’ score, plate angle and length, operation time and surgeon level. A three-variable model found TAD of 25mm or more and unstable fracture configuration to be predictive, but not poor reduction. Cases with a TAD of 25mm or more with unstable fracture configuration and a poor reduction had a 21.6% chance of cut out (8 of 29).

Conclusions: This is the first multifactorial multivariate analysis of a single implant sliding hip screw series. Compared with the literature, the rate of failure is low. Possible reasons include appropriate choice of implant for fracture type, improved performance with use of a single model of implant, and low exclusion rates due to the use of PACS.

Aims. To evaluate if, for orthopaedic trainees, additional cadaveric simulation training or standard training alone yields superior radiological and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation or hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture. Methods. This was a preliminary, pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group randomized controlled trial in nine secondary and tertiary NHS hospitals in England. Researchers were blinded to group allocation. Overall, 40 trainees in the West Midlands were eligible: 33 agreed to take part and were randomized, five withdrew after randomization, 13 were allocated cadaveric training, and 15 were allocated standard training. The intervention was an additional two-day cadaveric simulation course. The control group received standard on-the-job training. Primary outcome was implant position on the postoperative radiograph: tip-apex distance (mm) (DHS) and leg length discrepancy (mm) (hemiarthroplasty). Secondary clinical outcomes were procedure time, length of hospital stay, acute postoperative complication rate, and 12-month mortality. Procedure-specific secondary outcomes were intraoperative radiation dose (for DHS) and postoperative blood transfusion requirement (hemiarthroplasty). Results. Eight female (29%) and 20 male trainees (71%), mean age 29.4 years, performed 317 DHS operations and 243 hemiarthroplasties during ten months of follow-up. Primary analysis was a random effect model with surgeon-level fixed effects of patient condition, patient age, and surgeon experience, with a random intercept for surgeon. Under the intention-to-treat principle, for hemiarthroplasty there was better implant position in favour of cadaveric training, measured by leg length discrepancy ≤ 10 mm (odds ratio (OR) 4.08 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17 to 14.22); p = 0.027). There were significantly fewer postoperative blood transfusions required in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty by cadaveric-trained compared to standard-trained surgeons (OR 6.00 (95% CI 1.83 to 19.69); p = 0.003). For DHS, there was no significant between-group difference in implant position as measured by tip-apex distance ≤ 25 mm (OR 6.47 (95% CI 0.97 to 43.05); p = 0.053). No between-group differences were observed for any secondary clinical outcomes. Conclusion. Trainees randomized to additional cadaveric training performed hip fracture fixation with better implant positioning and fewer postoperative blood transfusions in hemiarthroplasty. This effect, which was previously unknown, may be a consequence of the intervention. Further study is required. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(8):602–611

Aims

The conversion of previous hip fracture surgery to total hip arthroplasty (CTHA) can be surgically challenging with unpredictable outcomes; reported complication rates vary significantly. This study aimed to establish the medium-term survival and outcomes of CTHA performed following a previous hip fracture surgery.

We biomechanically investigated whether the standard dynamic hip screw (DHS) or the DHS blade achieves better fixation in bone with regard to resistance to pushout, pullout and torsional stability. The experiments were undertaken in an artificial bone substrate in the form of polyurethane foam blocks with predefined mechanical properties. Pushout tests were also repeated in cadaveric femoral heads. The results showed that the DHS blade outperformed the DHS with regard to the two most important characteristics of implant fixation, namely resistance to pushout and rotational stability. We concluded that the DHS blade was the superior implant in this study

Background. Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) is the most frequently used implant in management of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. There is a known statistical relationship between a tip-apex distance (TAD) >25mm and higher rate of implant failure. Our aim was to analyse all DHS procedures performed in our trust from seventeen months and compare their TAD values to the acceptable standard of ≤25mm. Methods. All patients undergoing DHS between April 2020-August 2021 were identified from our theatre system. Additionally, those presenting to hospital with implant failures were included. Patient demographics, date of surgery, fracture classification (AO) and date/mode of failure were recorded. Intraoperative fluoroscopy images were reviewed to calculate TAD, screw location and neck shaft angles by two independent observers. Results. 215 patients were identified, five of which were excluded due to inadequate fluoroscopy. Failure was seen in 3.3% of the cohort (n=7), of which 71.4% had an unacceptable TAD. In total, 21 patients (10%) had TAD >25mm, of whom 12 had superiorly and 15 had posteriorly placed screws. There were no failures in patients with a TAD of <20mm whereas a TAD >30mm had 50% failure rate. Conclusion. This audit reinforces the importance of aiming for a low TAD (preferably <20mm) intraoperatively. It is also desirable to avoid superiorly and significantly posteriorly placed screws. Implications. Complex hip revision surgery in the elderly bears substantial financial implications to the NHS and, more importantly, causes prolonged morbidity to the patient. Adhering to established standards will ensure reduced implant failure and best patient care

A number of techniques have been developed to improve the immediate mechanical anchorage of implants for enhancing implant longevity. This issue becomes even more relevant in patients with osteoporosis who have fragile bone. We have previously shown that a dynamic hip screw (DHS) can be augmented with a calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite (CaS/HA) based injectable biomaterial to increase the immediate mechanical anchorage of the DHS system to saw bones with a 400% increase in peak extraction force compared to un-augmented DHS. The results were also at par with bone cement (PMMA). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of CaS/HA augmentation on the integration of a different fracture fixation device (gamma nail lag-screw) with osteoporotic saw bones. Osteoporotic saw bones (bone volume fraction = 15%) were instrumented with a gamma nail without augmentation (n=8) or augmented (n=8) with a CaS/HA biomaterial (Cerament BVF, Bonesupport AB, Sweden) using a newly developed augmentation method described earlier. The lag-screws from both groups were then pulled out at a displacement rate of 0.5 mm/s until failure. Peak extraction force was recorded for each specimen along with photographs of the screws post-extraction. A non-parametric t-test was used to compare the two groups. CaS/HA augmentation of the lag-screw led to a 650% increase in the peak extraction force compared with the controls (p<0.01). Photographs of the augmented samples shows failure of the saw-bones further away from the implant-bone interface indicating a protective effect of the CaS/HA material. We present a novel method to enhance the immediate mechanical anchorage of a lag-screw to osteoporotic bone and it is also envisaged that CaS/HA augmentation combined with systemic bisphosphonate treatment can lead to new bone formation and aid in the reduction of implant failures and re-operations

Extracapsular Hip Fractures (EHF's) are a significant health burden on healthcare services. Optimal treatment is controversial with conflicting evidence being reported. Currently treatment is undertaken with Intramedullary Nail (IMN) or Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) constructs with a recent increase in IMN use (1). This study aims to conduct a systematic review of Randomised Control Trials published between 2020 and 2023 with particular focus on patient demographics and holistic patient outcomes. Using a unified search-protocol, RCT's published between 2020 and 2023 were collected from CENTRAL, PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE. Rayyan software screened duplicates. Using the CASP and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool papers were critically examined twice, and Blood Loss, Infection and Mobility described the patient journey. Patient demographics were recorded and were contrasted with geographically diverse cohort studies to compare population differences. Parametric tests were used to determine significance levels between population demographics, namely Age and Sex. Eleven papers were included, representing 908 patients (436 Male). The mean age for patients was 64.39. There was considerable risk of bias in 7/11 studies owing to the randomization process and the recording of data. Four Cohort studies were selected for comparison representing 14314 patients. Mean age was significantly different between Cohort Studies and RCT's (Independent T-Test, df 13, t=7.8, p = <0.001, mean difference = 19.251, 95% CI = 13.888, 24.613). This was also true for sex ratios included in the studies (df 13, t = -2.268, p = 0.024, Mean Difference = -0.4884, 95% CI = -0.9702, -0.0066). To conclude, RCT's published in the post COVID-19 era are not representative of patient demographics. This has the potential to provide inaccurate information for implant selection. Additionally further research must be conducted in how to better improve RCT patient inclusion so as to be more representative of patients whilst balancing the risks of operations

The incidence of hip fractures in the elderly is increasing. Minimally displaced and un-displaced hip fractures can be treated with either internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty. The aim was identifying the revision rate of internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty in patients 60 years or older with Garden I or II hip fractures and to identify risk factors associated with each method. A retrospective analysis was conducted from 2 Major Trauma Centres and 9 Trauma Units between 01/01/2015 and 31/12/2020. Patients managed conservatively, treated with a total hip replacement and missing data were excluded from the study. 1273 patients were included of which 26.2% (n=334) had cannulated hip fixation (CHF), 19.4% (n=247) had a dynamic hip screw (DHS) and 54.7% (n=692) had a hemiarthroplasty. 66 patients in total (5.2%) required revision surgery. The revision rates for CHF, DHS and hemiarthroplasty were 14.4%, 4%, 1.2% (p<0.001) respectively. Failed fixation was the most common reason for revision with the incidence increasing by 7-fold in the CHF group [45.8% (n=23) vs. 33.3% (n=3) in DHS; p<0.01]. The risk factors identified for CHF revision were age >80 (p<0.05), female gender (p<0.05) and smoking (p<0.05). The average length of hospital stay was decreased when using CHF compared to DHS and hemiarthroplasty (12.6 days vs 14.9 days vs 18.1 days respectively, p<0.001) and the 1 year mortality rate for CHF, DHS and hemiarthroplasty was 2.5%, 2% and 9% respectively. Fixation methods for Garden I and II hip fractures in elderly patients are associated with a higher revision rate than hemiarthroplasty. CHF has the highest revision rate at 14.4% followed by DHS and hemiarthroplasty. Female patients, patients over the age of 80 and patients with poor bone quality are considered high risk for fixation failure with CHF. When considering a fixation method in such patients, DHS is more robust than a screw construct, followed by hemiarthroplasty

Aims. To develop a core outcome set of measurements from postoperative radiographs that can be used to assess technical skill in performing dynamic hip screw (DHS) and hemiarthroplasty, and to validate these against Van der Vleuten’s criteria for effective assessment. Methods. A Delphi exercise was undertaken at a regional major trauma centre to identify candidate measurement items. The feasibility of taking these measurements was tested by two of the authors (HKJ, GTRP). Validity and reliability were examined using the radiographs of operations performed by orthopaedic resident participants (n = 28) of a multicentre randomized controlled educational trial (ISRCTN20431944). Trainees were divided into novice and intermediate groups, defined as having performed < ten or ≥ ten cases each for DHS and hemiarthroplasty at baseline. The procedure-based assessment (PBA) global rating score was assumed as the gold standard assessment for the purposes of concurrent validity. Intra- and inter-rater reliability testing were performed on a random subset of 25 cases. Results. In total, 327 DHS and 248 hemiarthroplasty procedures were performed by 28 postgraduate year (PGY) 3 to 5 orthopaedic trainees during the 2014 to 2015 surgical training year at nine NHS hospitals in the West Midlands, UK. Overall, 109 PBAs were completed for DHS and 80 for hemiarthroplasty. Expert consensus identified four ‘final product analysis’ (FPA) radiological parameters of technical success for DHS: tip-apex distance (TAD); lag screw position in the femoral head; flushness of the plate against the lateral femoral cortex; and eight-cortex hold of the plate screws. Three parameters were identified for hemiarthroplasty: leg length discrepancy; femoral stem alignment; and femoral offset. Face validity, content validity, and feasibility were excellent. For all measurements, performance was better in the intermediate compared with the novice group, and this was statistically significant for TAD (p < 0.001) and femoral stem alignment (p = 0.023). Concurrent validity was poor when measured against global PBA score. This may be explained by the fact that they are measuring difference facets of competence. Intra-and inter-rater reliability were excellent for TAD, moderate for lag screw position (DHS), and moderate for leg length discrepancy (hemiarthroplasty). Use of a large multicentre dataset suggests good generalizability of the results to other settings. Assessment using FPA was time- and cost-effective compared with PBA. Conclusion. Final product analysis using post-implantation radiographs to measure technical skill in hip fracture surgery is feasible, valid, reliable, and cost-effective. It can complement traditional workplace-based assessment for measuring performance in the real-world operating room . It may have particular utility in competency-based training frameworks and for assessing skill transfer from the simulated to live operating theatre. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:594–604

The aim of the study was to compare mortalitiy and complication rate after operative treatment of pertrochanteric fractures with primary cemented arthroplasty, dynamic hip screw (DHS) or proximal femoral nail (PFN). 283 patients, which were treated betwen 1992 and 2005 for pertrochanteric femoral fractures, except pathologic fractures and a minimum age of sixty years were included. 132 of these 283 patients were treated by primary arthroplasty. Up to the end of 1999 all unstable fractures were treated by primary total hip replacement. In the year 2000 the PFN was introduced and only patients with severe osteoarthritis and osteoporosis received primary arthroplasty. I possible, more stable fractures were treated with a DHS. One year mortality was chosen as main indicator as it depends on the surgical trauma as well as the rapid return to preinjury activity and further complications. A one year period was chosen as the mortality ratio approaches that of an age matched reference population after this interval. Influencing cofactors were eliminated by stepwise logistic regression analysis. It was shown that restoration of the preoperative ambulatory level correlated with survival rate after one year. As elderly patients are often unable to cooperate with partial weight bearing, the primary stability of the device is crucial to allow early mobilisation. Mortality was significantly influenced by age, gender and comorbidities but not by fracture classification. One-year mortality was significantly higher for primary total hip replacement (34.2 %) than for internal fixation (DHS: 18.4 %; PFN 21.4 %) and hemiarthroplasty (13.3 %). Since the PFN and hemiarthroplasty were introduced the over all mortality was reduced from 29 % to 18 %. Conclusion: For stable fractures a Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and for unstable fractures a short proximal femoral nail (PFN) can be recommended. Primary cemented hemiarthroplasty is a viable option for treatment of intertrochanteric fractures if osteoporosis prevents from full weight bearing or if osteoarthritis makes further operations likely. Primary total hip replacement should be avoided, due to the fact that dislocation and mortality were significantly higher than in the other groups

Objectives. The use of two implants to manage concomitant ipsilateral femoral shaft and proximal femoral fractures has been indicated, but no studies address the relationship of dynamic hip screw (DHS) side plate screws and the intramedullary nail where failure might occur after union. This study compares different implant configurations in order to investigate bridging the gap between the distal DHS and tip of the intramedullary nail. Methods. A total of 29 left synthetic femora were tested in three groups: 1) gapped short nail (GSN); 2) unicortical short nail (USN), differing from GSN by the use of two unicortical bridging screws; and 3) bicortical long nail (BLN), with two angled bicortical and one unicortical bridging screws. With these findings, five matched-pairs of cadaveric femora were tested in two groups: 1) unicortical long nail (ULN), with a longer nail than USN and three bridging unicortical screws; and 2) BLN. Specimens were axially loaded to 22.7 kg (50 lb), and internally rotated 90°/sec until failure. Results. For synthetic femora, a difference was detected between GSN and BLN in energy to failure (p = 0.04) and torque at failure (p = 0.02), but not between USN and other groups for energy to failure (vs GSN, p = 0.71; vs BLN, p = 0.19) and torque at failure (vs GSN, p = 0.55; vs BLN, p = 0.15). For cadaveric femora, ULN and BLN performed similarly because of the improvement provided by the bridging screws. Conclusions. Our study shows that bicortical angled screws in the DHS side plate are superior to no screws at all in this model and loading scenario, and suggests that adding unicortical screws to a gapped construct is probably beneficial

Background. Hip fractures cause significant morbidity and mortality, affecting 70,000 people in the UK each year. The dynamic hip screw (DHS) is used for the osteosynthesis of extracapsular neck of femur fractures, a procedure that requires complex psychomotor skills to achieve optimal lag screw positioning. The tip-apex distance (TAD) is a measure of the position of the lag screw from the apex of the femoral head, and is the most comprehensive predictor of cut-out (failure of the DHS construct). To develop these skills, trainees need exposure to the procedure, however with the European Working Time Directive, this is becoming harder to achieve. Simulation can be used as an adjunct to theatre learning, however it is limited. FluoroSim is a digital fluoroscopy simulator that can be used in conjunction with workshop bones to simulate the first step of the DHS procedure (guide-wire insertion) using image guidance. This study assessed the construct validity of FluoroSim. The null hypothesis stated that there would be no difference in the objective metrics recorded from FluoroSim between users with different exposure to the DHS procedure. Methods. This multicentre study recruited twenty-six orthopaedic doctors. They were categorised into three groups based on the number of DHS procedures they had completed as the primary surgeon (novice <10, intermediate 10≤x<40 and experienced ≥40). Twenty-six participants completed a single DHS guide-wire attempt into a workshop bone using FluoroSim. The TAD, procedural time, number of radiographs, number of guide-wire retires and cut-out rate (COR) were recorded for each attempt. Results. A significant construct effect was seen for TAD and COR between novice and other users (p < 0.05). The intermediate and experienced users were not significantly different for these metrics. For all other metrics, experienced users had the highest score, contrary to expectation. Conclusion. FluoroSim was able to separate novice users from other cohorts for the two clinically significant outcome metrics. We can therefore partially reject the null hypothesis as construct validity was present for TAD and COR. We have demonstrated that FluoroSim has the potential to be a useful adjunct when learning the psychomotor skills needed for the DHS procedure away from theatre

Background. Radiation exposure remains a significant occupational hazard for Orthopaedic surgeons. There are no references values for trauma procedures performed with Image Intensifier (II). We aimed to determine and compare reference values for patient radiation exposure for common trauma operations, and to analyse the effect of surgeon grade on II usage. Methods. Data collected prospectively from 849 cases between 01/05/2013 and 01/10/2014 were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed to calculate reference values for dose area product (DAP), screening time (ST), and number of II images taken for common trauma procedures where n>9 (n=808). Results. Dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation required significantly less radiation than proximal femoral nail (PFN) for intertrochanteric hip fractures for median DAP (668mG/cm2 vs 1040mG/cm2, p<0.001), ST (00:36 vs 00:48, p<0.001), and number of II images (65 vs 110, p<0.001). Radiation exposure was statistically significantly less when Consultant Orthopaedic surgeons were first surgeon compared to Staff grade doctors and Orthopaedic trainees for DAP (90.55mGy/cm2 vs 175.5mGy/cm2 vs 366.5mGy/cm2), screening time (00:26 vs 00:32 vs 00:36), and number of II images (49 vs 59 vs 66). Conclusions. We reported reference values for common trauma operations that are essential to enable monitoring of patient radiation exposure. PFN required greater radiation exposure than DHS for intertrochanteric hip fracture. Increased surgical experience lead to lower radiation exposure in trauma operations, which could be developed to assess trauma competence within surgical training. Level of evidence. III

Background. The advantages of treatment by open reduction and internal fixation for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur have been well known for several decades. Failure of fixation can result in revision surgery, prolonged inpatient stay and has major socio-economic consequences. There are many new devices on the market to help deal with this problem. Expandable hip screw (EHS) is one such device, which is an expanding bolt that may offer superior fixation in osteoporotic bone compared to the standard dynamic hip screw (DHS) type device. Methods. Static axial compression tests with elastic deformation of the specimens were performed with a crosshead speed of 10 mm/min to determine stiffness of testing was performed with 3 cycles from 0 N to 250 N, 3 cycles from 0 N to 500 N, 3 cycles from 0 N to 750 N and 3 cycles from 0 N to 1000 N with a holding time of 10 s per test cycle. Displacement control was apply the pullout strength with a velocity of 1mm/sec. The ability to resist rotation about the axis of a lag screw is of critical importance particularly when the fracture line is perpendicular, or nearly perpendicular, to the femoral neck. Implants were subjected to a rotation of 1 degree/sec and peak torque values were recorded. Results. The mean axial cyclic loading DHS showed higher stiffness value than EHS. The mean stiffness achieved at pullout test in the EHS and DHS groups were 587.8N/mm and, 334.1N/mm respectively (p<0.05). The peak torque for the EHS device was significantly greater than the torque for the DHS with torque values of 4.56 Nm/degree and 2.97 Nm/degree, respectively (p<0.05). Conclusions. The EHS device demonstrated superior resistance to pullout and torsion greater loads compared to the DHS in an unstable fracture model. However, axial cyclic loading demonstrate lower strength, by optimising the size of device will perform. Level of Evidence. Level 5