Background. High tibial osteotomy is a common procedure to treat symptomatic osteoarthritis of the medial compartment of the knee with varus alignment. This is achieved by overcorrecting the varus alignment to 2–6° of valgus. Various high tibial osteotomy techniques are currently used to this end. Common procedures are medial opening wedge and lateral closing wedge tibial osteotomies. The lateral closing wedge technique is a primary stable correction with a high rate of consolidation, but has the disadvantage of bone loss and change in tibial condylar offset. The medial opening wedge technique does not result in any bone loss but needs to be fixated with a plate and may cause tibial slope and medial collateral ligament tightening. Purpose. The purpose of this article is to examine correlation between femoral rotational angle and subjective satisfaction of high tibial osteotomy outcome of the range of motion of knee joint. Materials and methods. The subjects were 15 patients (6 males, 9 females) with primary osteoarthritis undergoing high tibial osteotomy from June of 2004 to August of 2008. They were CT tested on the knee joint before and after high tibial osteotomy. TEA and Akagi's line are analysed as percentages. The Kendall's and Spearman's nonparametric correlation coefficient were used for the statistical tests with 0.5 level of significance. Results. We observed a negative linear relationship (p = 0.0001) between the femoral component external rotation (measured by TEA) and active and passive ROM. Pearson Coefficient was −0.80, −0.57, respectively. We can find a negative linear relationship (p=0.001) between Akagi's line and passive ROM, and Pearson coefficient was −0.863. Preoperative flexion contracture, age, tibiofibula angle, pain, and other factors do not influence the ROM of the patient. Follow up duration do not influence the ROM of the patient. Conclusion. The result reveals that femoral rotational angle correlates with not the range of motion of knee joint but subjective satisfaction of the patients. In HTO, beside deformity correction in coronal plane, rotation of the femur contributes postoperative pain relief

Purpose. Computer navigation system has been reported as a useful tool to obtain the proper alignment of lower leg and precise implantation in TKA. This system alsoãζζhas shown the accurate gap balancing which was lead to implants longevity and optimal knee function. The aim of this study was determine that the postoperative acquired deep knee flexion would be influenced by intraoperative kinematics on navigated TKA even under anesthesia. Materials & methods. Forty knees from 40 patients, who underwent primary TKA (P.F.C. sigma RPF, DePuy Orhopaedic International, Leed, UK) with computer-navigation system (Ci Knee, BrainLAB / DePuy Inc, Leeds, UK), were recruited in this study. These patients were classified into two groups according to the recorded value of maximum knee flexion at three month after surgery: 15 patients who obtained more than 130 degrees of flexion in Group A, and 25 patients less than 130 degrees in Group B. We retrospectively reviewed about intraoperative kinematics in each group, to obtain the clue for post operative deep-flexion. The measurements of intraoperative kinematics were consisted of 3 points: femoral rotation angle (degree) and antero-posterior translation (mm), which were measured as the translation of the lowest points of femoral component to tibial cutting surface, and the joint gap difference between the medial and lateral components gap (mm). All joint kinematic data were recorded at every 10 degrees of flexion from maximum extension to flexion under anesthesia. Results. There were no significant differences between two groups about preoperative diagnosis, sex, age, BMI, and preoperative range of motion. At 3 months, the recorded mean value of maximum knee flexion was 134.7 degrees in Group A, and 112.0 degrees in Group B. Femoral components were rotated internally up to 90 degrees flexion, and then rotated externally with flexion to the tibial plateau in the axial plane. There was no significant difference in femoral rotation angle between two groups, but slightly greater in Group A. Regarding to antero-posterior translation, femoral component had an anterior translation up to 50 degrees in both groups. The posterior translation was started at more than 50 degrees, and total amount of posterior displacement was significantly greater in Group A. The gap difference of lateral side was significantly greater in Group A than that in Group B especially at more than 110 degrees of flexion. Discussion. We found two parameters that can obtain greater knee flexion at more than 130 degrees in the early postoperative period. There were significant differences between two groups about the femoral rollback at more than 50 degrees of flexion, and the gap difference at more than 110 degrees of flexion. Navigation system would only suggest that intraoperatively optimal knee kinematics for femoral rollback and slight laxity at more than 110 degrees of flexion to lead the medial pivot motion. The surgeon can keep it in mind for soft tissue release to obtain the ideal postoperative function. Conclusion. This study showed that the axial rotation and posterior translation of femoral component were important factors for acquisition of postoperative deep flexion

Introduction. One of the objectives of total hip arthroplasty is to restore femoral and acetabular combined anteversion. It is desirable to reproduce both femoral and acetabular antevesions to maximize the acetabular cup fixation coverage and hip joint stability. Studies investigated the resultant of implanted femoral stem anteversion in western populations showed that the implanted femoral stems had only a small portion can meet the desirable femoral anteversion angle. 1. , and anteversion angle increases after the implantation of an anatomical femoral stem with anteverted stem neck comparing to anatomical femoral neck. 2. The purpose of this study was to anatomically measure the anteversion angular difference between metaphyseal long axis and femoral neck in normal Chinese population. The metaphyseal long axis represents the coronal fixation plane of modern cementless medial-lateral cortical fitting taper stem. This angular difference or torsion Δ angle provides the estimation of how much the neck antevertion angle of femoral stem would be needed to match for desirable anatomical femoral neck version. Methods. 140 (77 male and 63 female) anonymous normal adult Chinese CT data with average age of 54.6 (male 54.6, female 54.5, P=0.95) were segmented and reconstructed to 3D models in Trauson Orthopeadic Modeling and Analytics (TOMA) program. Femoral head center, femoral neck axis and center point of diaphyseal canal 100mm bellow calcar formed the femoral neck plane. The metaphyseal stem implantation plane was determined by the center point of medial calcar, proximal canal central axis formed by femoral neck plane and the center point of diaphyseal canal 100mm bellow calcar. [Fig. 1] The angle between two planes was the torsion Δ angle between femoral placement plane and anatomical femoral neck. [Fig. 2] The torsion Δ angles were measured for all 140 cases. The traditional anteversion angle for anatomical femoral neck was also measured by Murphy's method. Student T test was perform to compare the angles for male and female. The 98% confidence level was assumed. Results. The average torsion Δ angle for whole population was 4.9°(0.04°-15.6°), SD=3.52°, male: 4.6° (0.42°-13.9°), SD=3.09°; female: 5.3° (0.04°-15.6°), SD=3.98°. There was no statistical significant difference between genders. P=0.28. All metaphyseal stem placement planes were less anteverted than anatomical femoral neck plane. [Fig. 3] The average anatomical femoral neck anteversion angle for total population was 18.6° (0.27°-42.6°), SD=7.54°; male: 18.6° (0.27°-32.9°), SD=7.37°; female: 18.7° (1.74°-42.6°), SD=7.81°. There was no statistical significance between male and female P=0.92. Only 26% of study population or 37 cases with unadjusted implant neck version had normal anteversion angle of 10°-15° (Tönnis). Discussion. The study suggested femoral stem neck anteversion angle adjustments up to 11° was necessary to match anatomical femoral neck for 94% of cases in Chinese population. And the adjustments of 0°-7° represented the 76% majority of population. This finding was in agreement with the published data in western population. 2. . Significance. Variable femoral stem neck anteversion angles up to 11° are necessary to reproduce the anatomical anteversions for 94% of normal Chinese population. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Purpose. The complication of patellofemoral compartment was quite often in total knee arthroplasty. One of the impotant factors in these complications would be the femoral component rotation in TKA. To determine the rotation of the femoral component, the reference of the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA), posterior condylar axis (PCA), AP axis with three dimensional model achieved from computed tomography data were considered. There are some limitations with pre-oprerative CT-based planning such as radio exposure, cost, time and detection of the depth of cartilage. We evaluate the determination of the femoral component rotation with image-free registration method to compare with three-dimensional template system. Material and Methods. Thirty six knees were evaluated to determine the femoral component rotation. The reference points were marked to measure the PCA (posterior condylar axis), SEA (surgical transepicondylar axis), and APA (anteroposterior axis, Whiteside line) intra-operatively and calculated the angle from PCA to SEA and PCA to APA with Image free navigation system (BrainLAB). Those knees were preoperatively evaluated the angle deviation from SEA to PCA with three dimensional template system. These angle deviations, which suggested the femoral component rotation obtained from preoperative template system, were statistically compared with the femoral rotation angle in clinical situation. Results. The mean angle from PCA to SEA was external rotated 2.7 degrees (SD=1.8 degrees) with the template system. During image- free system in TKA, the mean angle from PCA to SEA was external rotated 2.2 degrees (SD=4.5 degrees), and the mean angle from APA to SEA was 0.5 degrees (SD=4.4 degrees). Discussion. The preoperative 3 dimensional template system showed the small ranges and standard deviations in PCA and SEA even when the residual cartilage of the surface at the femur was not considered to evaluate. Meanwhile, the three reference axes obtained from image free navigation system showed the large amount of deviations and thus the variability in these references was difficult to decide the rotation of the femoral component. Now navigation system provided the appropriate gap balance during knee motion. This gap-navigation technique would be one of the keys to obtain the proper rotation of the component

Combined anteversion angle of acetabular component and femeral neck is an important factor for total hip arthroplasty (THA) as it may affect impingement and dislocation. Previous studies have collected data mainly from direct measurements of bone morphology or manual measurements from 2D or 3D radiolographic images. The purpose of this study was to electronically measure the version angles in native acetabulum and femur in matured normal Caucasion population using a novel virtual bone database and analysis environment named SOMA™. 221 CT scans from a skeletally mature, normal Caucasian population with an age range of 30–95 years old. The population included 135 males and 86 females. CT data was converted to virtual bones with cortical and cancellous boundaries using custom CT analytical sofware. (SOMA™ V.3.2) Auxillary reference frames were constructed and measurements were performed within the SOMA™ design environment. Acetabular Anteversion (AA) angle as defined by Murray. 1. was measured. The acetabular rim plane was constructed by selecting 3 bony land marks from pubis, ilium and ischium. A vector through acetabular center point and normal to the rim plane defined the plane for the AA measurement. The AA was defined as the angle of this plane relative to the frontal (Coronal) plane of the pelvis. The Femoral Neck Anteversion (FNA) angle was measured from the neck axis plane to the frontal (Coronal) plane as defined by the posterior condyles. The neck axis plane was constructed to pass through femoral neck axis perpendicular to the transverse plane. The combined anteversion angle was computed as the summation of acetabular and femoral anteversion angles. Student's t tests were performed to compare gender difference with an assumed 95% confidence level. The mean AA angle for total population was 25.8°, SD=7.95°. The mean AA for male was 24.8°, SD=5.93° and for female was 27.3°, SD=7.14°. P=0.009. The mean FNA angle for total population was 14.3°, SD=6.52°. The mean FNA for male was 13.5°, SD=7.97° and for female was 15.5°, SD=7.80°. P=0.058. The mean combined anteversion angle for total population was 40.1°, SD=10.76°. The mean combined anteversion angle for male was 38.3° SD=10.39 ° and for female was 42.8° SD=10.83 °. P=.0002. The plot of AA as a function of FNA shows weak correlation for both male and female. (Figure 1) The frequency distribution is shown in Figure 2. The results showed the both AA, FNA and combined anteversion angles were significantly smaller in male population than that in female population. The FNA angle of the cementless femoral stem can be smaller than with the natural femur, therefore a higher AA or higher posterior build up may be required for the acetabular component for optimal function of a THA