A matched comparison was made between femoral neck-preserving short, tapered stems (n = 50) and conventional length femoral stems (n = 50) in cementless total hip arthroplasty between January 2008 and January 2012. Patients were matched for age, sex, body mass index, height, surgical approach, and surgeon. In group A, mean preoperative HHS and WOMAC scores of 55.0 and 53.0, respectively, improved to mean postoperative scores of 98.6 and 3.3, respectively, at an average follow–up of 37.2 months. In group B, mean preoperative HHS and WOMAC scores of 53.0 and 49.5, respectively, improved to mean postoperative scores 97.8 and 4.4, respectively, at an average follow–up of 35.3 months. In addition, no significant differences in mean postoperative HHS (P = 0.168) or WOMAC scores (P = 0.158) were observed between the two groups according to the independent sample t-test. Table 1 shows two stems (4%) located in valgus (greater than 5° from neutral). The mean preoperative and postoperative HHS and WOMAC scores were similar to those of stems neutrally located in group A. All group A stems displayed bone bridging and endosteal spot welds distributed in Gruen zones 2 and 6 as evidence of bony ingrowth with no radiolucencies (Fig. 1). Two patients in group B had the slight decrease in bone density, mostly in Gruen zone 1 and 7. No radiographic evidence of osteolytic lesions, cortical hypertrophy, or acetabular fractures was detected in either group. Furthermore, no patient required revision surgery for aseptic loosening. The chi–square (Fisher's exact) test showed no significant difference between the two groups with respect to patient complications (Table 2). One patient in group A with a CCD angle of 135° had subsidence (greater than 2 mm, P =0.313) that displayed bony ingrowth with no further progression of subsidence at final follow-up. An intraoperative minor
INTRODUCTION. THA as primary treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly still remains a prominent concern. Overall dislocation rate after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is reported form 1∼5%. But, it is quiet different in situation of
Removal of bullets retained within joints is indicated to prevent mechanical blockade, 3rd body wear and resultant arthritis, plus lead arthropathy and systemic lead poisoning. The literature is sparse on this subject, with mostly sporadic case reports utilizing hip arthroscopy. We report on the largest series of removal of bullets from the hip joints using open surgical. We reviewed prospectively collected data of patients who presented to a single institution with civilian gunshot injuries that breached the hip joint between 01 January 2009 and 31 December 2022. We included all cases where the bullet was retained within the hip joint area. Exclusion criteria: cases where the hip joint was not breached, bullets were not retained around the hip area or cases with isolated acetabulum involvement. One hundred and eighteen (118) patients were identified. One patient was excluded as the bullet embedded in the
To identify ideal screw placement for internal fixation of intra capsular fracture neck of femur to avoid fixation failures, 20 cadaveric bone measurements of the neck of femur in basal, midcervical and at sub capital regions were carried out using Vernial caliper and CT scan. Midcervical region of neck of femur measurements were further divided into upper half (Superior half) and Inferior half (Inferior Half). AP and Lateral view X-rays were obtained following three parallel screws placements in
INTRODUCTION. Experience with Metal on Metal (MoM) hip resurfacing devices has shown adequate cementation of the femoral head is critical for implant survival. Bone necrosis can be caused by the temperature change in the peri-prosthetic bone whilst the cement cures during implantation. This can lead to implant loosening, head/neck fracture and implant failure. During the implantation it is known that implants change shape potentially altering joint clearance and causing loosening. Given the history of Metal on Metal implant failure due adverse tissue reactions from Cobalt and Chromium particles we sought to test a novel Ceramic on Ceramic (CoC) bearing which may mitigate such problems. AIM. We set out to compare the behaviour of a novel ceramic femoral head component to a standard metal component in a hip resurfacing system after cemented implantation in a physiological warmed cadaveric model. Our first aim was to perform heat transfer analysis: To document time to, and extent of, maximum temperature change on the metal/ceramic surface and inside the resurfaced femoral head bone. Our second aim was to perform a dimensional analysis: To document any resulting deformation in the metal/ceramic femoral head bearing diameter during cementation. METHODS. Femurs were removed from four fresh frozen cadavers and placed into a vice. One surgeon with extensive experience in hip resurfacing surgery (JH) prepared all the femoral heads for implantation. Cadaveric warming was performed using a thermostatic silicone heating element to achieve near physiological conditions (28–32°C). The femur components were then implanted onto the femur head using Simplex P (Stryker) low viscosity bone cement. We used four ceramic (ReCerf™) and four metal implants (ADEPT®) of equal and varying size. (2 × (42mm, 46mm, 48mm, 50mm). Temperature change was measured using a thermometer probe placed into
Purpose. We evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty using rectangular cross-section stem for femoral neck fracture in elderly patients more than 80 years of age with osteoporosis. Material and Methods. 76(cemented 46, cementless 30) bipolar hemiarthroplasties for
Introduction. Hip resurfacing arthoplasty (HRA) is an alternative to total hip arthroplasty (THA), which has increased in the last years, especially in young patients. A suitable positioning of the resurfacing head is important, mainly because it is strongly related with the neck fracture. The goal of this work was to evaluate the influence of the resurfacing head positioning in the load distribution along the femurs’ structures. Materials and methods. Using 3D scan technology, the exterior geometry of a composite femur, used to create the FE models, was obtained. Three resurfacing models were used in three different positions in the frontal plane. A model with a positive offset of +5mm (Resurfacing #1), in neutral position (Resurfacing #2), and with a negative offset of −5mm (Resurfacing #3) was developed. A Birmingham® Hip Resurfacing prosthesis was chosen according to the femurs’ head. It was positioned in the femur and acetabulum by an experimented surgeon. The metal on metal contact pair was implemented. Models were aligned with 7° and 9°, considering the position of the anatomical femurs in sagittal and frontal planes. Models were constrained on the wing of the ilium and ischial tuberosity, allowing only vertical and rotational movements on the iliac side. Femurs were constrained on its distal side, allowing only rotational movements. Results. The most important strains in four different aspects, anterior, posterior, medial and anterior were analyzed. The highest differences occurred on the medial alignment of femurs. Comparing models Resurfacing #1 and Resurfacing #2, the highest displacement increase (11%) comparatively at the neutral position was observed. Besides, comparing models Resurfacing #2 and Resurfacing #3, displacement decrease of 13% (resurfacing #3) in the same region was observed. Thus, one can conclude that: a positive offset increases the strains on the
Purpose. There are some concerns about doing hip resurfacing arthroplasty in ONFH due to bone defect which can cause mechanical weakness of femoral component and highly active young age of patients which can cause high wear rate and failure rate. The purpose of this study is to verify the HRA is safe procedure in ONFH in the aspect of mechanical and biological issue. Materials and Methods. Between December 1998 and May 2005, 185 hips of 169 patients underwent MoM HRA using Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System® at single center. 166 hips (26 hips of female, 140 hips of male) of 144 patients have been reviewed for at least 7 years after MoM HRA. Mean follow-up period was 101.8 (84–178) months. Their mean age at the time of operation was 37.7(16–67) years old. Clinically, Harris hip scores (HHS), UCLA activity scores and range of motion were evaluated. Radiologically, the extent of necrotic area in preoperative MRI and radiolucency around implants, narrowing of retained neck, impingement, stress shielding, and heterotopic ossification were evaluated in the serial anteroposterior and groin lateral radiographs of hip. Complications were defined as joint dislocation, infection, implant loosening, femoral neck fracture and pseudotumor. Failure was defined as revision arthroplasty due to the complications. Results. The extent of necrotic area in preoperative MRI was average 37.6 (13.3–65)%. Clinically, average HHS was improved from 81.7 points to 98.5 points at last follow-up. Average UCLA activity score at last follow-up was 9.0 points. Range of motion at last follow-up was very satisfactory. There was no patient with severe pain around hip joint. Radiologically, radiolucency was shown around acetabular component in 2 cases (1.2%) and around stem of femoral components in 3 cases (1.8%). Fracture of femoral neck was seen in 1 case(0.6%). Moderate narrowing changes of retained femoral neck were noticed in 4 cases (2.4%). Impingement was seen in 12 cases (7.2%). We found only 1 case of osteolysis at Gruen zone III of acetabulum. Heterotopic ossification was found in 5 cases (3.0%). There was no case with hip dislocation, infection or pseudotumor. Revision surgeries after the primary resurfacing arthroplasty were performed in 4 cases (2.4%). Three hips were revised to the conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA) because of loosening of acetabular component and
