Introduction. Circular external fixators are fundamental to lower limb reconstruction, primarily in situations with a high risk of infection such as open fractures. During the Covid-19 pandemic, use of circular frames in our unit decreased, following departmental approval, due to resource management and in keeping with BOA guidelines as we opted to “consider alternative techniques for patients who require soft tissue reconstruction to avoid multiple operations”. These alternatives included the use of internal fixation (plate osteosynthesis and intramedullary nailing) as a measure to reduce the number of hospital attendances for patients and to conserve resources. This change in practice has continued in part following the pandemic with the increased use of internal fixation in cases previously deemed unsuitable for such techniques. We present our experience of this treatment strategy in the management of complex lower limb injuries, focusing on outcomes and consider the lessons learnt. Materials & Methods. Data of patients with complex lower limb injuries treated before, during and after the pandemic were collected from our in-house trauma database, theatre records and follow up clinics. The rationale for choosing other techniques over a circular frame, the type of alternative technique used, the cost of such alternatives, the need for soft tissue reconstruction, time to recovery, complications and amputation rates were compared among groups. Results. These data suggest comparable outcomes between circular frames and alternative techniques can be achieved. A notable reduction in the number of circular frames applied during the review period was observed. Furthermore, frame fixation was associated with more frequent outpatient review and the associated implications for resource management. Conclusions. Conclusion: The Covid-19 pandemic has posed great challenges to the Trauma and Orthopaedic community, forcing us to be flexible by adopting alternative treatment methods to traditional circular external fixation. These alternatives have proven feasible and potentially more cost effective, prompting their adoption in the post pandemic era. However, this change of practice is not without potential consequences and continued investigation is warranted

Introduction. The condition of the soft tissues surrounding an ankle fracture influences timing and treatment of injuries. Conventional treatment used an open approach to facilitate anatomical reduction and rigid internal fixation. Intramedullary devices for fibular fractures provide a safe alternative in patients in which the condition of the soft tissue envelope or the patient's co-morbidities may benefit from a less invasive approach. We compared outcomes for patients treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with those undergoing treatment with fibular nails (FN). Methods. 13 consecutive patients treated with fibular nails (FN) were compared with 13 age-matched patients that underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). All patients were followed to union. Study outcomes were time from admission to surgery, length of stay, wound failure, implant failure, revision surgery, OMAS and SF-36. Results. There was no difference in age or sex distribution between groups. There was no difference in OMAS at 1 year (83 ± 9 in FN group; 80± 21 in ORIF group) and SF-36 (94 ± 11 and 90 ± 20). There were 2 implant failures in the ORIF group and none in the FN group. There was one wound failure in the ORIF group and none in the FN group. Patients treated with FN had a shorter time to surgery (1 day ± 24 hours vs 3 days ± 24 hours) and shorter length of stay (1 day ± 24 hours vs 4 days ± 96 hours). Conclusion. FN is a safe method to treat patients with displaced distal fibular fractures that may have a poor soft tissue envelope and risk factors for wound healing. FN reduces the time to surgery and overall length of stay compared with similar patients treated with conventional ORIF

Hip fractures frequently occur in elderly patients with osteoporosis and are rapidly increasing in prevalence owing to an increase in the elderly population and social activities. We experienced several recent presentations of TFNA nails failed through proximal locking aperture which requires significant revision surgery in often highly co-morbid patient population. The study was done by retrospective data collection from 2013 to 2023 of all the hip fractures which had been fixed with Cephalomedullary nails to review and compare Gamma (2013–2017) and TFNA (2017–2023) failure rates and the timing of the failures. Infected and Elective revision to Arthroplasty cases were excluded. The results are 1034 cases had been included, 784 fixed with TFNA and 250 cases fixed Gamma nails. Out of the 784 patients fixed with TFNA, 19 fixation failed (2.45%). Out of the 250 cases fixed with Gamma nails, 15 fixation failed (6%). Mean days for fixation failure were 323 and 244 days in TFNA and Gamma nails respectively. We conclude that TFNA showed remarkable less failure rates if compared to Gamma nails. At point of launch, testing was limited and no proof of superiority of TFNA over Gamma nail. Several failures identified with proximal locking aperture in TFNA which can be related to the new design which had Substantial reduction in lateral thickness at compression screw aperture

The optimal method of tibial fixation when using a hamstring tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is unclear. This study aimed to compare the risk of revision ACL reconstruction between suspensory and interference devices on the tibial side. Prospective data on primary ACL reconstructions recorded in the New Zealand ACL Registry between April 2014 and December 2019 were analyzed. Only patients with a hamstring tendon autograft fixed with a suspensory device on the femoral side were included. The rate of revision ACL reconstruction was compared between suspensory and interference devices on the tibial side. Univariate Chi-Square test and multivariate Cox regression was performed to compute hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with adjustment for age, gender, time-to-surgery, activity at the time of injury, number of graft strands and graft diameter. 6145 cases were analyzed, of which 59.6% were fixed with a suspensory device on the tibial side (n = 3662), 17.6% fixed with an interference screw with a sheath (n = 1079) and 22.8% fixed with an interference screw without a sheath (n = 1404). When compared to suspensory devices (revision rate = 3.4%), a higher risk of revision was observed when using an interference screw with a sheath (revision rate = 6.2%, adjusted HR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.20 – 3.52, p = 0.009) and without a sheath (revision rate = 4.6%, adjusted HR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.02 – 3.23, p = 0.044). The number of graft strands and a graft diameter of ≥8 mm did not influence the risk of revision. When reconstructing the ACL with a hamstring tendon autograft, the use of an interference screw, with or without a sheath, on the tibial side has a higher risk of revision when compared to a suspensory device

The extracortical single-button (SB) inlay repair is one of the most preferred distal biceps tendon repair techniques. However, specific complications such as neurovascular injury and non-anatomic repairs have led to the development of techniques that utilize intracortical double-button (DB) fixation. To compare the biomechanical stability of the extracortical SB repair with the anatomical DB repair technique. Controlled laboratory study. The distal biceps tendon was transected in 18 cadaveric elbows from 9 donors. One elbow of each donor was randomly assigned to the extracortical SBor anatomical DB group. Both groups were cyclically loaded with 60N over 1000 cycles between 90° of flexion and full extension. The elbow was then fixed in 90° of flexion and the repair construct loaded to failure. Gap-formation and construct stiffness during cyclic loading, and ultimate load to failure was analysed. After 1000 cycles, the anatomical DB technique compared with the extracortical SB technique showed significantly less gap-formation (mean difference 1.2 mm; p=0.017) and significantly more construct stiffness (mean difference 31 N/mm; p=0.023). Ultimate load to failure was not significantly different comparing both groups (SB, 277 N ±92 vs. DB, 285 N ±135; p=0.859). The failure mode in the anatomical DB group was significantly different compared with the extracortical SB technique (p=0.002) and was due to fracture avulsion of the BicepsButton in 7 out of 9 specimens (vs. none in SB group). Our study shows that the intracortical DB technique produces equivalent or superior biomechanical performance to the SB technique. The DB repair technique reduces the risk of nerve injury and better restores the anatomical footprint of biceps tendon. The DB technique may offer a clinically viable alternative to the SB repair technique

Introduction. Distal femur fractures have traditionally been stabilized with either lateral locking plate or retrograde intramedullary nail. Dual-plates and nail-plate combination fixation have the theoretical biomechanical advantage, faster union and allows patients to weight bear immediately. The aim of this study is to compare single vs combination fixation, and evaluate outcomes and complications. Method. We retrospectively reviewed all patients over 60, admitted to Christchurch Hospital, between 1st Jan 2016 and 31st Dec 2022, with an AO 33A/33B/33C distal femur fracture. Patient demographics, fracture characteristics, operation details, and follow up data were recorded. Primary outcomes are union rate, ambulatory status at discharge, and surgical complications. Secondary outcomes include quality of reduction, operation time and rate of blood transfusions. Results. 114 patients were included. (92 single fixation, 22 combination fixation). Baseline demographic data and fracture characteristics did not differ between the cohorts. There was no difference in the rate of union or time to union between the two cohorts. Combination fixation patients were allowed to weight-bear as tolerated significantly more than single fixation patients (50% vs 18.9%, p=0.003). There was no difference in length of hospital stay, transfusion, complication and mortality rates. Medial translation of the distal articular block was significantly lower in the combination fixation cohort (1.2% vs 3.4%, p=0.021). Operation time was significantly longer in the combination fixation cohort (183mins vs 134mins, p<0.001). Discussion. The results show no difference in achieving union or time to union, despite better quality of fracture reduction with dual fixation. This differs to previously published literature. The clear benefit of combination fixation is immediate weight-bearing. As expected, operation times were longer with combination fixation, however this did not translate to more complications. Conclusion. Combination fixation allows earlier weight bearing, at the cost of longer operation times

This study aimed to determine if multiple failed closed reductions (CRs) prior to fixation of distal radius fracture is associated with the odds of complication-related reoperation up to two years post fracture. We identified all distal radius fracture patients aged 18 or older between the years of 2003-2016 in Ontario, Canada from linked administrative databases. We used procedural and fee codes to identify patients who underwent primary outpatient surgical fixation between 8 and 14 days post fracture, and grouped patients by the number of CRs they underwent prior to definitive fixation. We excluded patients who underwent fixation within 7 days of their fracture to exclude more complex fracture types and/or patients who required more immediate surgery. We grouped patients according to the number of CRs they underwent prior to definitive fixation. We used intervention and diagnostic codes to identify reoperations within two years of fixation. We used multi-level multivariable logistic regression to compare the association between the number of CRs and reoperation while accounting for clustering at the surgeon level and adjusting for other relevant covariables. We performed an age-stratified analysis to determine if the association between the number of CRs and reoperation differed by patient age. We identified 5,464 patients with distal radius fractures managed with outpatient fixation between 8 and 14 days of their fracture. A total of 1,422 patients (26.0%) underwent primary surgical fixation (mean time to fixation 10.6±2.0 days), while 3,573 (65.4%) underwent secondary fixation following one failed CR (mean time to fixation 10.1±2.2 days, time to CR 0.3±1.2 days), and 469 (8.6%) underwent fixation following two failed CRs (mean time to fixation 10.8±2.2 days, time to first CR 0.0±0.1 days, time to second CR 4.7±3.0 days). The CR groups had higher proportions of female patients compared to the primary group, and patients who underwent two failed CRs were more likely to be fixed with a plate (vs. wires or pins). The unadjusted proportion of reoperations was significantly higher in the group who underwent two failed CRs (7.5%) compared to those who underwent primary fixation (4.4%), and fixation following one failed CR (4.9%). Following covariable adjustment, patients who underwent two failed CRs had a significantly higher odds of reoperation (odds ratio [OR] 1.72 [1.12-2.65]) compared to those who underwent primary fixation. This association appeared to worsen for patients over the age of 60 (OR 3.93 [1.76-8.77]). We found no significant difference between the odds of reoperation between patients who underwent primary fixation vs. secondary fixation following one failed CR. We found that patients with distal radius fractures who undergo multiple CRs prior to definitive fixation have a significantly higher odds of reoperation compared to those who undergo primary fixation, or fixation following a single CR. This suggests that surgeons should offer fixation if indicated following a single failed CR rather than attempt multiple closed reductions. Prospective studies are required to confirm these findings

The Lisfranc fracture dislocation of the tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ) is a complex injury with a reported incidence of 9.2 to 14/100,000 person-years. Lisfranc fixation involves dorsal bridge plating, transarticular screws, combination or primary arthrodesis. We aimed to identify predictors of poor patient reported outcome measures at long term follow up after operative intervention. 127 patients underwent Lisfranc fixation at our Level One Trauma Centre between November 2007 and July 2013. At mean follow-up of 10.7 years (8.0-13.9), 85 patients (66.92%) were successfully contacted. Epidemiological data including age, gender and mechanism of injury and fracture characteristics such as number of columns injured, direction of subluxation/dislocation and classification based on those proposed by Hardcastle and Lau were recorded. Descriptive analysis was performed to compare our primary outcomes (AOFAS and FFI scores). Univariate analysis and multivariate regression analysis was done adjusted for age and sex to compare the entirety of our data set. P<0.05 was considered significant. The primary outcomes were the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Midfoot Score and the Foot Function Index (FFI). The number of columns involved in the injury best predicts functional outcomes (FFI, P <0.05, AOFAS, P<0.05) with more columns involved resulting in poorer outcomes. Functional outcomes were not significantly associated with any of the fixation groups (FFI, P = 0.21, AOFAS, P = 0.14). Injury type by Myerson classification systems (FFI, P = 0.17, AOFAS, P = 0.58) or open versus closed status (FFI, P = 0.29, AOFAS, P = 0.20) was also not significantly associated with any fixation group. We concluded that 10 years post-surgery, patients generally had a good functional outcome with minimal complications. Prognosis of functional outcomes is based on number of columns involved and injured. Sagittal plane disruption, mechanism and fracture type does not seem to make a difference in outcomes

Ligament reconstruction following multi-ligamentous knee injuries involves graft fixation in bone tunnels using interference screws (IS) or cortical suspensory systems. Risks of IS fixation include graft laceration, cortical fractures, prominent hardware, and inability to adjust tensioning once secured. Closed loop suspensory (CLS) fixation offers an alternative with fewer graft failures and improved graft-to-tunnel incorporation. However, graft tensioning cannot be modified to accommodate errors in tunnel length evaluation. Adjustable loop suspensory (ALS) devices (i.e., Smith & Nephew Ultrabutton) address these concerns and also offer the ability to sequentially tighten each graft, as needed. However, ALS devices may lead to increased graft displacement compared to CLS devices. Therefore, this study aims to report outcomes in a large clinical cohort of patients using both IS and CLS fixation. A retrospective review of radiographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes following ligament reconstruction from a Level 1 trauma centre was completed. Eligible patients were identified via electronic medical records using ICD-10 codes. Inclusion criteria were patients 18 years or older undergoing ACL, PCL, MCL, and/or LCL reconstruction between January 2018 and 2020 using IS and/or CLS fixation, with a minimum of six-month post-operative follow-up. Exclusion criteria were follow-up less than six months, incomplete radiographic imaging, and age less than 18 years. Knee dislocations (KD) were classified using the Schenck Classification. The primary outcome measure was implant removal rate. Secondary outcomes were revision surgery rate, deep infection rate, radiographic fixation failure rate, radiographic malposition, Lysholm and Tegner scores, clinical graft failure, and radiographic graft failure. Radiographic malposition was defined as implants over 5 mm off bone or intraosseous deployment of the suspensory fixation device. Clinical graft failure was defined as a grade II or greater Lachman, posterior drawer, varus opening at 20° of knee flexion, and/or valgus opening at 20° of knee flexion. Radiographic failure was defined when over 5 mm, 3.2 mm, and/or 2.7 mm of side-to-side difference occurred using PCL gravity stress views, valgus stress views, and/or varus stress views, respectively. Descriptive statistics were used. Sixty-three consecutive patients (mean age = 41 years, range = 19-58) were included. A total of 266 CLS fixation with Ultrabuttons and 135 IS were used. Mean follow-up duration was 383 days. Most injuries were KD type II and III. Graft revision surgery rate was 1.5%. Intraosseous deployment occurred in 6.2% and 17% had implants secured in soft tissue, rather than on bone. However, the implant removal rate was only 6.2%. Radiographic PCL gravity stress views demonstrated an average of 1.2 mm of side-to-side difference with 6.2% meeting criteria for radiographic failure. A single patient met radiographic failure criteria for collateral grafts. Mean Lysholm and Tegner scores were 87.3 and 4.4, respectively, with follow-up beyond one year. Both IS and CLS fixation demonstrate an extremely low revision surgery rate, a high rate of implant retention, excellent radiographic stability, and satisfactory patient-reported outcome scores. Incorrect implant deployment was seen in a total of 17% of patients, yet none required implant removal. A single patient required graft revision due to implant failure

Implant loosening is one of the primary mechanisms of failure for hip, knee, ankle and shoulder arthroplasty. Many established implant fixation surfaces exist to achieve implant stability and fixation. More recently, additive manufacturing technology has offered exciting new possibilities for implant design such as large, open, porous structures that could encourage bony ingrowth into the implant and improve long-term implant fixation. Indeed, many implant manufacturers are exploiting this technology for their latest hip or knee arthroplasty implants. The purpose of this research is to investigate if the design freedoms offered by additive manufacturing could also be used to improve initial implant stability – a precursor to successful long-term fixation. This would enable fixation equivalent to current technology, but with lower profile fixation features, thus being less invasive, bone conserving and easier to revise. 250 cylindrical specimens with different fixation features were built in Ti6Al4V alloy using a Renishaw AM250 additive manufacturing machine, along with 14 specimens with a surface roughness similar to a conventional titanium fixation surface. Pegs were then pushed into interference fit holes in a synthetic bone material using a dual-axis materials testing machine equipped with a load/torque-cell (figure 1). Specimens were then either pulled-out of the bone, or rotated about their cylindrical axis before being pulled out to quantify their ability to influence initial implant stability. It was found that additively manufactured fixation features could favourably influence push-in/pull-out stability in one of two-ways: firstly the fixation features could be used to increase the amount pull-out force required to remove the peg from the bone. It was found that the optimum fixation feature for maximising pull-out load required a pull-out load of 320 N which was 6× greater than the least optimum design (54 N) and nearly 3× the maximum achieved with the conventional surface (120 N). Secondly, fixation features could also be used to decrease the amount of force required to insert the implant into bone whilst improving fixation (figure 2). Indeed, for some designs the ratio of push-in to pull-out was as high as 2.5, which is a dramatic improvement on current fixation surface technology, which typically achieved a ratio between 0.3–0.6 depending on the level of interference fit. It was also found that the additively manufactured fixation features could influence the level of rotational stability with the optimum design resisting 3× more rotational torque compared to the least optimum design. It is concluded that additive manufacturing technology could be used to improve initial implant stability either by increasing the anchoring force in bone, or by reducing the force required to insert an implant whilst maintaining a fixed level of fixation. This defines a new set of rules for implant fixation using smaller low profile features, which are required for minimally invasive device design

The Femoral Neck System (FNS) was introduced as an alternative device for the fixation of neck of femur fractures (NOFFs). The purported advantages include superior angular and rotatory stability compared to multiple cancellous screws, via a minimally invasive instrumentation that is simpler than conventional fixed angle devices. There were limited clinical studies regarding the utility of this device. We aimed to study the outcomes of NOFFs fixed with the FNS. This was a single-institution, retrospective review of all undisplaced elderly (≥60 years old) undisplaced young, and displaced young NOFFs fixed with the FNS. Demographics, surgical parameters, radiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes including complications were reviewed. Thirty-six subjects with a median age of 75 [44,89] years old, had NOFF fixation using the FNS. Thirty-one (86.1%) had undisplaced fractures. There were 6 (16.7%), 26 (72.2%), and 4 (11.1%) subjects with Pauwels types 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Thirty-two (88.9%) had posterior tilt of <20º. The mean duration of surgery was 71±18 minutes. Excluding 4 patients whom required revision surgery, 2 patients whom demised, and 10 patients whom defaulted reviews, the mean follow-up duration was 55±13 weeks. Four complications were recorded, namely implant cut out at the femoral head at week 8, breaking of the locking screw at the run-off region at week 22, avascular necrosis at week 25, and a refracture following near fall, causing the fracture to fail in varus at week 7 postoperation. While reasonably fast to instrument, failures still occur and it is likely multifactorial. However, the rate of reoperation is lower than what has been reported for NOFFs fixed with the a fixed-angle device or 3 cancellous screws. In conclusion, the FNS is a reasonably safe instrument to use. Surgeons’ discretion is still needed in patient selection, keeping in mind the need for satisfactory radiological parameters

Abstract. Background. Aim of this study is to determine the difference between re-operation rates after conventional Methods of fixation of patella fractures using Metallic implants and novel technique of all suture fixation using Ethibond or fiber tape. Methods. This is a retrospective comparative analysis involving 62 patients who had a transverse patellar fracture and underwent surgery between January 2013 to December 2021. Selected patients were divided, based on different fixation methods used, into four groups - TBW group, CC screw group, Encirclage group and Suture Fixation Group. Patients were followed till bone union was evident on radiographs. Number of patients in Metallic implant group undergoing repeat operation were compared with the patients who underwent patella fracture fixation using all suture technique. Mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated for all continuous variables. Mean of the two groups was compared using unpaired t-test. Results. TBW was the most common method of fixation used in 41(66.1%) patients. 7 patients each underwent surgery using CC screw, Encirclage +/− TBW, and suture fixation respectively. Bone union was seen in about 85% of patients in all the groups suggesting all treatment modalities lead to good fracture healing. 15 patients(36.6%) of patients in TBW group and 3 patients(42.9%) in encirclage group had implant removal because of hardware-related complications (p<0.001). None of the patient who underwent All suture Fixation underwent re-operation. Conclusion. The results suggest that Suture fixation of patellar fractures is a valid treatment modality giving excellent results with similar bone union rates without any complications

Meniscal root tears can result from traumatic injury to the knee or gradual degeneration. When the root is injured, the meniscus becomes de-functioned, resulting in abnormal distribution of hoop stresses, extrusion of the meniscus, and altered knee kinematics. If left untreated, this can cause articular cartilage damage and rapid progression of osteoarthritis. Multiple repair strategies have been described; however, no best fixation practice has been established. To our knowledge, no study has compared suture button, interference screw, and HEALICOIL KNOTLESS fixation techniques for meniscal root repairs. The goal of this study is to understand the biomechanical properties of these fixation techniques and distinguish any advantages of certain techniques over others. Knowledge of fixation robustness will aid in surgical decision making, potentially reducing failure rates, and improving clinical outcomes. 19 fresh porcine tibias with intact medial menisci were randomly assigned to four groups: 1) native posterior medial meniscus root (PMMR) (n = 7), 2) suture button (n = 4), 3) interference screw (n = 4), or 4) HEALICOIL KNOTLESS (n = 4). In 12 specimens, the PMMR was severed and then refixed by the specified group technique. The remaining seven specimens were left intact. All specimens underwent cyclic loading followed by load-to-failure testing. Elongation rate; displacement after 100, 500, and 1000 cycles; stiffness; and maximum load were recorded. Repaired specimens had greater elongation rates and displacements after 100, 500, and 1000 cycles than native PMMR specimens (p 0.05). The native PMMR showed greater maximum load than all repair techniques (p 0.05). In interference screw and HEALICOIL KNOTLESS specimens, failure occurred as the suture was displaced from the fixation and tension was gradually lost. In suture button specimens, the suture was either displaced or completely separated from the button. In some cases, tear formation and partial failure also occurred at the meniscus luggage tag knot. Native PMMR specimens failed through meniscus or meniscus root tearing. All fixation techniques showed similar biomechanical properties and performed inferiorly to the native PMMR. Evidence against significant differences between fixation techniques suggests that the HEALICOIL KNOTLESS technique may present an additional option for fixation in meniscal root repairs. While preliminary in vitro evidence suggests similarities between fixation techniques, further research is required to determine if clinical outcomes differ

Dual plate constructs have become an increasingly common fixation technique for midshaft clavicle fractures and typically involve the use of mini-fragment plates. The goal of this technique is to reduce plate prominence and implant irritation, as these are common reasons for revision surgery. However, limited biomechanical data exist for these lower-profile constructs. The study aim was to compare dual mini-fragment orthogonal plating to traditional small-fragment clavicle plates for biomechanical non-inferiority and to determine if an optimal plate configuration could be identified, using a cadaveric model. Twenty-four cadaveric clavicles were randomized to one of six groups (n=4 per group), stratified by CT-based bone mineral content (BMC). The six different plating configurations compared were: pre-contoured superior or anterior fixation using a single 3.5-mm LC-DC plate, and four different dual-plating constructs utilizing 2.4-mm and 2.7-mm reconstruction or LC-DC plates. The clavicles were plated and then osteotomized to create an inferior butterfly fracture, which was then fixed with a single interfragmentary screw (OTA 15.2B). Axial, torsional, and bending (anterior and superior surface loading) stiffness were determined for each construct through non-destructive cyclic testing, using an MTS 858 Bionix materials testing system. This was followed by a load-to-failure test in three-point superior-surface bending. Kruskal-Wallace H and Mann-Whitney U were used to test for statistical significance. There were no significant differences in BMC (median 7.9 g, range 4.2-13.8 g) for the six groups (p=1.000). For axial stiffness, the two dual-plate constructs with a superior 2.4-mm and anterior 2.7-mm plate (either reconstruction or LC-DC) were significantly stiffer than the other four constructs (p=0.021). For both superior and anterior bending, the superior 2.4-mm and anterior 2.7-mm plate constructs were significantly stiffer when compared to the 3.5-mm superior plate (p=0.043). In addition, a 3.5-mm plate placed anterior was a stiffer construct than a superior 3.5-mm plate (p=0.043). No significant differences were found in torsional stiffness or load-to-failure between the different constructs. Dual plating using mini-fragment plates is biomechanically superior for fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures when compared to a single superior 3.5-mm plate and has similar biomechanical properties to a 3.5-mm plate placed anteriorly. With the exception of axial stiffness, no significant differences were found when different dual plating constructs were compared to each other. However, placing a 2.4-mm plate superiorly in combination with a 2.7-mm plate anteriorly might be the optimal construct, given the biomechanical superiority over the 3.5-mm plate placed superior

Abstract. Background. Atypical femur fracture (AFF) is a well known complication of Bisphosphonate therapy. Due to prolonged suppression of bone re-modelling in these fractures, surgical complications are difficult to manage. The aim of this study was to analyze the causes of surgical complications in AFF fixations and provide algorithm for management. Method. In this retrospective 10-year study (2010–2020), we identified patients surgically treated for AFF. We included patients who underwent revision surgery for any cause. Data collection included demographics, surgical complications, details of revision surgery and time to union. Result. Out of 57 patients who were operated for AFF, 17 underwent revision fixation. The average age was 69 with only 2 males. Around two-third (64%) were sub-trochanteric fractures and method of fixation in 64% cases was intra-medullary nail. The most common complication was non-union (12), followed by stress fracture and infection in 3 and 2 cases respectively. In most cases inadequate reduction and sub-optimal fixation was perceived as cause of failure except two cases which got infected. Revision fixation in all cases included improved bone contact (non-union site osteotomy), use of bone morphogenic proteins and improved fixation with augmentation device (either nail or plate). Follow up at 1 year showed fracture union in 12 cases, remaining 5 revision fixations failed, 3 of which were managed with proximal femur replacement. Conclusion. High rate of non-union after fixation in AFF. Optimizing the fixation construct results in union in most cases. However, arthroplasty should be considered in elderly patients with poor bone quality

Introduction. By utilising the inherent variability achievable with circular frames, surgeons can manage a wide spectrum of complex injuries, and can deal with deformity at multiple levels, in multiple planes. The aim of this study was to assess functional outcomes utilising patients reported outcome measures (PROMs) of patients being treated with circular (Ilizarov) frame fixation for complex lower limb injuries and assess these results in conjunction with the observed postoperative alignment of the patients’ limbs. Materials & Methods. Cases were identified using a prospectively collected database of adult patients presenting between July 2018 and August 2021. Functional outcomes were assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ5D5L), the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (LKSS), the Olerud-Molendar Ankle Score (OMAS), and the Tegner Activity Scale (TAS). Postoperative radiographs were analysed for fracture union and to quantify malunion (as described in Dror Paleys Principles of Deformity Correction). Results. The mean AOFAS, EQ5D5L, LKSS and OMAS scores showed an initial drop from pre-op to early time points and then steady increase over the early, mid, late and frame-off time points, with a resultant score higher than pre-op. Malunion was found in 35 (41.7%) patients, 7 patients had a malunion within 5 degrees of normal, 15 from 5–10 degrees of normal, 12 from 10–15 degrees of normal and 2 out with 15 degrees of normal. Conclusions. Circular frame fixation is an attractive option in complex lower limb trauma where alternative fixation methods are unsuitable. Whilst post-operative success to the surgeon might be determined radiographically, patient reported outcomes give a functionally important, objective measure of the success of the surgery to the patient

Introduction. Ilizarov fixators are reliant on tensioned fine wires for stability. The tension in the wires is generated using specific tensioning devices. Loss of wire tension over time may lead of loss a stability and complications. A series of in vitro experiments were undertaken to explore wire tensioner accuracy, the impact of fixation bolt torque and initial tension on loss of tension in ilizarov constructs under static and dynamic loads. Materials & Methods. Medical grade materials were applied to a synthetic bone analogue using surgical instruments in all experiments. Bolt torque was fixed at 6, 10 or 14 Nm using a torque limiting wrench. Wire tension was assessed using a strain measurement bridge. Wires were tensioned to 90, 110 and 130kg as measured by a commercial dynamometric tensioner. Static and dynamic testing was undertaken using an instron testing machine. Cyclical loads from 50–750N were applied for 5000 cycles. Results. Actual wire tension was approximately 15% less than indicated by the tensioner device. Using fixation bolt torques of 10Nm and 14Nm achieved final wire tensions of around 60% and 80% of that applied at 90 and 130kg of applied tension. Static load testing demonstrated self stiffening to similar levels in all pre-tensions. Dynamic testing demonstrated significant loss of tension, most of which occured in the first 3 cycles, inversely proportional to the tension initially applied. Conclusions. These experiments provides insight into the effect of initially applied wire tension on Illizarov mechanical performance. It is important surgeons understand how the different ways that these devices are applied affects mechanical performance. Further research examining what factors affect performance across different manufacturers equipment would therefore be relevant, alongside the development of novel fixation methods to reduce wire slippage and the further development of equipment for clinical use

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is commonly used to treat patients with rotator cuff tear arthropathy. Loosening of the glenoid component remains one of the principal modes of failure and is the main complication leading to revision. For optimal RSA implant osseointegration to occur, the micromotion between the baseplate and the bone must not exceed a threshold of 150 µm. Excess micromotion contributes to glenoid loosening. This study assessed the effects of various factors on glenoid baseplate micromotion for primary fixation of RSA. A half-fractional factorial experiment design (2k-1) was used to assess four factors: central element type (central peg or screw), central element cortical engagement according to length (13.5 or 23.5 mm), anterior-posterior (A-P) peripheral screw type (nonlocking or locking), and bone surrogate density (10 or 25 pounds per cubic foot [pcf]). This created eight unique conditions, each repeated five times for 40 total runs. Glenoid baseplates were implanted into high- or low-density Sawbones™ rigid polyurethane (PU) foam blocks and cyclically loaded at 60 degrees for 1000 cycles (500 N compressive force range) using a custom designed loading apparatus. Micromotion at the four peripheral screw positions was recorded using linear variable displacement transducers (LVDTs). Maximum micromotion was quantified as the displacement range at the implant-PU interface, averaged over the last 10 cycles of loading. Baseplates with short central elements that lacked cortical bone engagement generated 373% greater maximum micromotion at all peripheral screw positions compared to those with long central elements (p < 0.001). Central peg fixation generated 360% greater maximum micromotion than central screw fixation (p < 0.001). No significant effects were observed when varying A-P peripheral screw type or bone surrogate density. There were significant interactions between central element length and type (p < 0.001). An interaction existed between central element type and level of cortical engagement. A central screw and a long central element that engaged cortical bone reduced RSA baseplate micromotion. These findings serve to inform surgical decision-making regarding baseplate fixation elements to minimize the risk of glenoid loosening and thus, the need for revision surgery

Fixation of tendon transfers about the foot in children typically involves creating a bone tunnel through which a suture is passed and tied over an external button. An internal suspension system, such as the Endobutton (Smith & Nephew) is an alternative fixation method which has demonstrated excellent fixation strength and minimal intraosseous tunnel displacement in various adult procedures. Application of the Endobutton technique has no risk of skin ulceration, does not require suture removal and may provide more secure fixation. The purpose of this study is to compare the biomechanical properties of the external button and Endobutton fixation techniques. Our primary outcome measure was intra-osseous displacement of the suture, during both static and dynamic loading, in cadaver feet. Nine adult cadaver feet were utilised. A bone tunnel was drilled in the lateral cuneiform and #1 braided non-absorbable suture was passed through the tunnel. One end was secured to a carabiner to be attached to the materials testing system and the other to the fixation device. The external button and Endobutton fixation techniques were tested once in each cadaver, randomising the order of testing to minimise bias. Each fixation technique underwent static and dynamic cyclic loading. A custom Matlab script was used to process video and materials testing system data. The relative displacement of the suture within the bone tunnel, as a function of time and load magnitude, was recorded during static and dynamic cyclic loading. Both fixation groups were analysed and compared for statistical significance using a paired T-test and an alpha value of 0.05. The Endobutton group had significantly less displacement within the bone tunnel, during both static and dynamic loading, than the external button. The average displacement during static loading was 0.42 mm for the Endobutton and 2.17 mm for the external button (p=0.0019). Similarly, during dynamic cyclic loading, the mean displacement was 0.32 mm for the Endobutton and 0.66 mm for the external button (p=0.0115). The Endobutton internal suspension technique demonstrates significantly less displacement during static and dynamic loading than the external button, during biomechanical testing in cadaver feet. The Endobutton may provide superior fixation than the traditional external button technique for tendon transfers in children. In addition, this technique avoids the risk of skin ulceration from the button and the need for suture removal

Introduction. Temporary spanning fixation aims to provide bony stability whilst allowing access and resuscitation of traumatised soft-tissues. Conventional monolateral fixators are prone to half-pin morbidity in feet, variation in construct stability and limited weight-bearing potential. This study compares traditional delta-frame fixators to a circular trauma frame; a virtual tibial ring block spanned onto a fine-wire foot ring fixation. Materials and Methods. The two cohorts were compared for demographics and fracture patterns. The quality of initial reduction and the maintenance of reduction until definitive surgery was assessed by two authors and categorised into four domains. Secondary measures included fixator costs, time to definitive surgery and complications. Results. Fifty-six delta-frames and 48 circular fixators were statistically matched for demographics and fracture pattern. Good or excellent initial reduction was achieved in 51 (91%) delta-frames and 48 (100%) circular fixators (p=0.022). Loss of reduction was observed in 15 (27%) delta-frames and 3 (6%) circular fixators (p<0.001). Post-fixator dislocation occurred in five (9%) delta-frames and one (2%) circular fixator (p=0.147). Duration in spanned fixation was equivalent (11.5 and 11.6 days respectively, p=0.211). Three (5%) delta-frames and 12 (25%) circular fixators were used as definitive fixation. The mean hardware cost was £3,116 for delta-frames and £2,712 for circular fixators. Conclusions. Temporary circular fixation offers statistically superior intra-operative reduction and maintenance of reduction, facilitates weight-bearing and provides more opportunity as the definitive fixation. Circular fixation hardware proved to be less expensive and protected against further scheduled and unscheduled operations