Aims. To report the outcomes of patients with a fracture of the distal tibia who were treated with intramedullary nail versus locking plate in the five years after participating in the Fixation of Distal Tibia fracture (FixDT) trial. Methods. The FixDT trial reported the results for 321 patients randomized to nail or locking plate fixation in the first 12 months after their injury. In this follow-up study, we report the results of 170 of the original participants who agreed to be followed up until five years. Participants reported their Disability Rating Index (DRI) and health-related quality of life (EuroQol five-dimension three-level questionnaire) annually by self-reported questionnaire. Further surgical interventions related to the fracture were also recorded. Results. There was no evidence of a difference in patient-reported disability, health-related quality of life, or the need for further surgery between participants treated with either type of fixation at five years. Considering the combined results for all participants, there was no significant change in DRI scores after the first 12 months of follow-up (difference between 12 and 24 months, 3.3 (95% confidence interval -1.8 to 8.5); p = 0.203), with patients reporting around 20% disability at five years. Conclusion. This study shows that the moderate levels of disability and reduced quality of life reported by participants 12 months after a fracture of the distal tibia persist in the medium term, with little evidence of improvement after the first year. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(7):795–800

The ideal form of fixation for displaced, extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia remains controversial. In the UK, open reduction and internal fixation with locking-plates and intramedullary nailing are the two most common forms of treatment. Both techniques provide reliable fixation but both are associated with specific complications. There is little information regarding the functional recovery following either procedure. We performed a randomised pilot trial to determine the functional outcome of 24 adult patients treated with either a locking-plate (n = 12) or an intramedullary nailing (n = 12). At six months, there was an adjusted difference of 13 points in the Disability Rating Index in favour of the intramedullary nail. However, this was not statistically significant in this pilot trial (p = 0.498). A total of seven patients required further surgery in the locking-plate group and one in the intramedullary nail group. This study suggests that there may be clinically relevant, functional differences in patients treated with nail versus locking-plate fixation for fractures of the distal tibia and differences in related complications. Further trials are required to confirm the findings of this pilot investigation

A series of 3061 patients with fracture of the distal tibia or ankle was studied for a possible link between overweight and failed reduction. The relative body-weight was recorded as the preoperative self-reported body mass index (BMI) of each patient. There were 109 patients (3.6%) with failure of internal fixation or of closed reduction severe enough to necessitate refixation or corrective osteotomy. The mean BMI in all age- and gender-specific groups studied was found to be significantly higher in patients with failed reduction than in those with an uneventful course (p < 0.01). The relative risk of loss of reduction for patients with a BMI greater than 1SD above the BMI of the corresponding age and gender group of the general population was 3.72 for distal tibial fractures and 3.04 for ankle fractures. Overweight should be recognised as a significant factor in predicting a complicated course after a fracture of the lower leg. Awareness of the increased risk of loss of reduction in overweight patients is important in all phases of management

We have reviewed 15 cases of triplane fracture of the distal tibia. The mechanism of injury is lateral rotation and the anatomical pattern of the fracture depends on the state of the growth plate at the time of injury. In seven of our cases the anteromedial part of the growth plate was fused, but in eight children the plate was completely open. In six of these eight children there was a hump or projection of the medial growth plate. It is suggested that this hump stabilises the anteromedial part of the epiphysis in a manner similar to the partial anteromedial fusion seen in older children, and that this accounts for the occurrence of triplane fracture in the presence of an open growth plate

In a series of 126 consecutive pilon fractures, we have described anatomically explicable fragments. Fracture lines describing these fragments have revealed ten types of pilon fracture which belong to two families, sagittal and coronal. The type of fracture is dictated by the energy of injury, the direction of the force of injury and the age of the patient.

The October 2023 Trauma Roundup. 360. looks at: Intramedullary nailing versus sliding hip screw in trochanteric fracture management: the INSITE randomized clinical trial; Five-year outcomes for patients with a displaced fracture of the distal tibia; Direct anterior versus anterolateral approach in hip joint hemiarthroplasty; Proximal humerus fractures: treat them all nonoperatively?; Tranexamic acid administration by prehospital personnel; Locked plating versus nailing for proximal tibia fractures: a multicentre randomized controlled trial; A retrospective review of the rate of septic knee arthritis after retrograde femoral nailing for traumatic femoral fractures at a single academic institution

Osteoid osteoma is a benign bone-forming lesion, characterized by its small size, its clearly demarcated outline and by the usual presence of a surrounding zone of reactive bone formation. It often poses a diagnostic challenge due to its ambiguous presentation. The aetiology of osteoid osteoma is poorly understood. The previous suggestion that osteoid osteoma was not associated with trauma or infection has been challenged by more recent literature raising the possibility that it could be a reactive or healing response or a phenomenon associated with the revascularisation process. This case report describes an unusual presentation of a post-traumatic osteoid osteoma. Two years following a diaphyseal, spiral tibial fracture treated nonoperatively, the patient developed new pain at the previous fracture site. The pain was constant, relieved by non-steroidal analgesia and not associated with systemic upset. It was initially attributed to other more likely diagnoses such as osteomyelitis and neuropathic pain. Multiple investigations and interventions were undertaken prior to the definitive diagnosis being obtained by surgical excision of the lesion and histological studies five years after the injury and three years following the initiation of the discomfort. In both English and foreign language literature there are only seven case reports that document osteoid osteoma following fracture, these are predominantly in the lower limb with no predominance to operative or nonoperative management. This case report should raise the index of clinical suspicion of osteoid osteoma occurring post fracture.

Salter-Harris II fractures of the distal tibia affect children frequently, and when they are displaced present a treatment dilemma. Treatment primarily aims to restore alignment and prevent premature physeal closure, as this can lead to angular deformity, limb length difference, or both. Current literature is of poor methodological quality and is contradictory as to whether conservative or surgical management is superior in avoiding complications and adverse outcomes. A state of clinical equipoise exists regarding whether displaced distal tibial Salter-Harris II fractures in children should be treated with surgery to achieve anatomical reduction, or whether cast treatment alone will lead to a satisfactory outcome. Systematic review and meta-analysis has concluded that high-quality prospective multicentre research is needed to answer this question. The Outcomes of Displaced Distal tibial fractures: Surgery Or Casts in KidS (ODD SOCKS) trial, funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research, aims to provide this high-quality research in order to answer this question, which has been identified as a top-five research priority by the British Society for Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(5):471–473

Aim. The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of intramedullary nail fixation and ‘locking’ plate fixation in the treatment of extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia. Patients and Methods. An economic evaluation was conducted from the perspective of the United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services (PSS), based on evidence from the Fixation of Distal Tibia Fractures (UK FixDT) multicentre parallel trial. Data from 321 patients were available for analysis. Costs were collected prospectively over the 12-month follow-up period using trial case report forms and participant-completed questionnaires. Cost-effectiveness was reported in terms of incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained, and net monetary benefit. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of cost-effectiveness estimates. Results. Mean NHS and PSS costs were significantly lower for patients treated with an intramedullary nail than for those treated with a locking plate (-£970, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1685 to -256; p = 0.05). There was a small increase in QALYs gained in the nail fixation group (0.01, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.06; p = 0.52). The probability of cost-effectiveness for nail fixation exceeded 90% at cost-effectiveness thresholds as low as £15 000 per additional QALY. The cost-effectiveness results remained robust to several sensitivity analyses. Conclusion. This trial-based economic evaluation suggests that nail fixation is a cost-effective alternative to locking plate fixation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:624–33

Introduction: Unstable fractures of the distal tibia that are not suitable for intramedullary nailing are commonly treated by open reduction and internal þxation and/or external þxation techniques. Treatment of these injuries using minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) techniques may offer the advantage of achieving adequate þxation whilst minimising soft tissue injury and damage to the vascular integrity of the fracture fragments. Purpose: We report our experience using MIPO techniques for the treatment of unstable fractures of the distal tibia. Method: A review of all patients who sustained an unstable fracture of the distal tibia treated by MIPO between 1998 and 2001 was undertaken. Twenty patients were identiþed. The mean age was 38.3 years (17 Ð 71). All fractures were closed, and were classiþed according to the AO system. Intra-articular fracture extensions were classiþed according to RŸedi and Allgšwer. Results: Sixty percent of patients achieved callus by 8 weeks. All patients achieved callus by 3 months. The mean time to full weight bearing was 12 weeks (8 Ð 17). By 6 months 18/20 patients had achieved union. The two remaining patients achieved union by 7 months without further surgery. There were no deep infections and only one malunion. There were no cases of failure of þxation. Conclusion: MIPO appears to offer a reliable method of þxation of fractures of the distal tibia that are unsuitable for intramedullary nailing. Our results suggest that this technique is associated with a lower risk of signiþcant complications than encountered with more traditional methods of þxation of such fractures

Introduction. Pilon fractures are complex, high-energy, intra-articular fractures of the distal tibia. Achieving good outcomes is challenging due to fracture complexity and extensive soft tissue damage. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term functional and clinical outcomes of definitive management with fine wire Ilizarov fixation for closed pilon fractures. Materials and Methods. 185 patients treated over a 14-year period (2004–2018) were included. All patients had Ilizarov frames applied to restore mechanical axis and fine wires to control periarticular fragments. CT scans were performed post operatively to confirm satisfactory restoration of the articular surface. All frames were dynamized prior to removal. Patients' functional outcome was assessed using the validated Chertsey Outcome Score for Trauma (“COST”). Review of clinical notes and imaging was used to determine complications and time to union. Results. The mean functional outcome in the studied cohort was determined to be “average” on the “COST” score. Poorer functional outcomes were associated with younger age at time of injury and multi-fragment fracture patterns. Mean time in frame was 170 days. Complication rates were low. There were no deep infections, no amputations and only 8 patients went on to have ankle fusions. Conclusions. Good functional results and low complication rates can be achieved by managing pilon fractures with fine wire Ilizarov fixation. Nonetheless, at time of injury patients should be counselled as to the severity of the injury and impact on their functional status

The August 2012 Trauma Roundup. 360. looks at: pelvic fractures, thromboembolism and the Japanese; venous thromboembolism risk after pelvic and acetabular fractures; the displaced clavicular fracture; whether to use a nail or plate for the displaced fracture of the distal tibia; the dangers of snowboarding; how to predict the outcome of lower leg blast injuries; compressive external fixation for the displaced patellar fracture; broken hips in Morocco; and spinal trauma in mainland China

Aims: There has been recent interest in the use of external þxation for the treatment of distal peri-articular fractures. The current study was undertaken to evaluate the role of the hybrid external þxation system in the treatment of the distal tibial fractures. Methods: We treated 137 fractures of the distal tibia, of which 46 were treated with hybrid external þxation. The indication for this method of treatment was in the presence of an unstable extra-articular fracture and/or a severe comminution of the distal tibia, as well as an associated severe soft-tissue injury. Routine demographic data, clinical and radiographic þndings as well as reduction, outcomes and complications were recorded. Patients were evaluated with outcome scale of Ovadia and Beals. Results: There were 17 closed fractures and 29 open. Twenty-one extra -and 25 intrarticular fractures were managed with a Hybrid Fixator. All fractures achieved complete healing. Reductions of C-type fractures were within 0-2 mm in 16 and 3–5mm in 56 and > 5mm in 3 patients. The Hybrid External þxator was removed at an average of 17.5 weeks. Full weight bearing was achieved at a mean of 7.8 weeks. There were no intraoperative injuries to nerves or major vessels. Using the outcome scale of Ovadia and Beals, good-excellent results were achieved in 67% (n=31) subjectively and 72% (n=33) objectively. Two poor results occurred in patients with a varus malunion. Conclusion: External þxation is a satisfactory method of treatment for fractures of the distal tibia and is associated with fewer complications than internal þxation, because it limits the amount of soft tissue

We have assessed the proximal capsular extension of the ankle joint in 18 patients who had a contrast-enhanced MRI ankle arthrogram in order to delineate the capsular attachments. We noted consistent proximal capsular extensions anterior to the distal tibia and in the tibiofibular recess. The mean capsular extension anterior to the distal tibia was 9.6 mm (4.9 to 27.0) proximal to the anteroinferior tibial margin and 3.8 mm (−2.1 to 9.3) proximal to the dome of the tibial plafond. In the tibiofibular recess, the mean capsular extension was 19.2 mm (12.7 to 38.0) proximal to the anteroinferior tibial margin and 13.4 mm (5.8 to 20.5) proximal to the dome of the tibial plafond. These areas of proximal capsular extensions run the risk of being traversed during the insertion of finewires for the treatment of fractures of the distal tibia. Surgeons using these techniques should be aware of this anatomy in order to minimise the risk of septic arthritis

Introduction. Fractures of the distal tibia can be challenging to manage. Numerous surgical techniques have been utilised in managing these however there remains debate as to the optimum method of fixation. This study aims to assess the surgical outcomes and PROMs of patients with distal tibial fractures managed with intramedullary-nails or ring fixation. Methods. This is a retrospective study of patients with closed distal tibial fractures managed between 01/01/2013–31/12/2016. Adult patients admitted with closed fracture of the distal tibia fixed with an intramedullary-nail or circular-frame were included in the study. Primary outcomes were time of union, alignment of tibia post-operatively and the results of two validated PROMs (Kujala knee score and Olerud and Molander Ankle Score). Results. 12 patients had circular-frame and 14 patients underwent intramedullary-nailing. PROMS were completed in 9 (75%) of the frame group and 7 (50%) of the nail group. There was no statistically significant difference in age (p=0.095); no statistically significant difference in time to union (medians = frame 29.7 weeks, IM nail 24 weeks, p=0.212); no statistically significant difference in the coronal angulation difference from neutral (medians = frame 1.9 degrees, IM nail 2.0 degrees, p=0.940). There was statistically significant difference in sagittal angulation difference from neutral (Medians = frame 3 degrees, IM nail 0.6 degrees, p=0.041); the proportion of males in the frames groups was statistically significantly higher (p=0.033). There was no statistically significant difference in outcome of ankle scores (medians = frame 92.5, IM nail 75, p=0.132); there was a statistically significant difference in the knee score favouring the frame group (medians = frame 99, IM nail 74.5, p=0.041). Discussion. Our results show distal tibia fractures can be treated with circular-frames or IM-nails. Patients at high-risk of soft tissue complication or to minimise the risk of knee symptoms should be considered for a circular-frame

Aims. To systematically review qualitative studies of patients with distal tibia or ankle fracture, and explore their experience of injury and recovery. Methods. We undertook a systematic review of qualitative studies. Five databases were searched from inception to 1 February 2022. All titles and abstracts were screened, and a subset were independently assessed. Methodological quality was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. The GRADE-CERQual checklist was used to assign confidence ratings. Thematic synthesis was used to analyze data with the identification of codes which were drawn together to form subthemes and then themes. Results. From 2,682 records, 15 studies were reviewed in full and four included in the review. A total of 72 patients were included across the four studies (47 female; mean age 50 years (17 to 80)). Methodological quality was high for all studies, and the GRADE-CERQual checklist provided confidence that the findings were an adequate representation of patient experience of distal tibia or ankle fracture. A central concept of ‘being the same but different’ conveyed the substantial disruption to patients’ self-identity caused by their injury. Patient experience of ‘being the same but different’ was expressed through three interrelated themes, with seven subthemes: i) being proactive where persistence, doing things differently and keeping busy prevailed; ii) living with change including symptoms, and living differently due to challenges at work and leisure; and iii) striving for normality, adapting while lacking in confidence, and feeling fearful and concerned about the future. Conclusion. Ankle injuries were disruptive, draining, and impacted on patients’ wellbeing. Substantial short- and longer-term challenges were experienced during recovery. Rehabilitation and psychosocial treatment strategies may help to ameliorate these challenges. Patients may benefit from clinicians being cognisant of patient experience when assessing, treating, and discussing expectations and outcomes with patients. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(3):188–197

The aim of this study was to document the outcome following either early or delayed fixation for complex (AO-OTA type 43.C) fractures of the tibial plafond. From our trauma database we identified all patients who sustained a complex intra-articular fracture of the distal tibia over an 11-year period. Demographic data, fracture classification, management, complications and subsequent surgeries were recorded. The primary outcome measure was the development of early complications following surgery. The secondary outcome measure was the long-term patient reported outcome. There were 102 type C pilon fractures in 99 patients with a mean age of 42yrs (16–86) and 75.5% (n=77) were male. 73 (71.6%) patients underwent primary open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), with 20 (19.6%) undergoing primary external fixation with delayed ORIF. 34 complications were recorded in 28 (27.5%) patients. There were 18 (17.6%) infections, with a deep wound infection in 9 (8.8%) patients and a superficial wound infection in 9 (8.8%). Risk factors for developing infection were multiple co-morbidities (p=0.008), an open fracture (p=0.008), and primary external fixation with delayed ORIF (p=0.023). At a mean of 6 years (0.3–13; n=53) post injury the mean FAOS score was 76.2 (0–100), the mean FADI score was 75.7 (0–100), and 72% (n=38) of patients were satisfied. This is the largest series in the literature documenting the outcome following fixation for type C tibial pilon fractures. Despite the severity of these injuries, we have demonstrated a satisfactory outcome using primary early fixation in the vast majority of cases

Aims

Triplane ankle fractures are complex injuries typically occurring in children aged between 12 and 15 years. Classic teaching that closure of the physis dictates the overall fracture pattern, based on studies in the 1960s, has not been challenged. The aim of this paper is to analyze whether these injuries correlate with the advancing closure of the physis with age.

Aim. A prospective cohort of patients undergoing total ankle arthroplasrty for arthritis following pilon fractures was included in the present study. This group of patients generally have poor soft tissue envelope and have had previous surgical interventions prior to the ankle arthroplasty, making the arthroplasty more difficult as well as prone to complications. Methods. The data collected included patient demographics, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) and patient reported outcomes (FAOS, SF-36, patient satisfaction) The data was collected preoperatively and at 1 & 2 years postoperatively. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years post-operatively. Results. A total of 167 total ankle arthroplasties were performed by the senior author between Jan 2006 and June 2010. Of this cohort, the indication for 12 arthroplasties was arthritis following pilon fractures of the distal tibia. The average of the patients at the time of the surgery was 64.2yrs. The average number of previous surgeries prior to the ankle arthroplasty was 1.5. There were significant improvements in the AOFAS scores from an average of 18 to 75 at final review. The WOMAC scores improved from 31 to 71 for pain, stiffness improved from 31 to 60 and function improved from 33 to 63. The improvement of the SF36 and patient satisfaction score is similar to the ones for primary ankle osteoarthritis. The complications were: 1 case of superficial wound infection which settled with antibiotics, one fracture of medial malleolus and one case of undisplaced distal tibial fracture treated conservatively to union. Conclusion. The Indications for TAR can be safely broadened to include younger patients with arthritis following pilon fractures of the tibia. The Outcomes after TAR for patients with arthritis following pilon fractures are comparable to those for primary osteo arthritis of the ankle

Introduction: The use of Ilizarov frames is contraindicated in patients with psychiatric conditions, thought to be due to non compliance. We present our experience of treating five fractures with Ilizarov frame in four patients who sustained their injuries through parasuicide. Method: Consecutive series of patients treated by a single surgeon at our institution. Five fractures in four patients, (one bilateral fracture) were treated with an Ilizarov fine wire frame. All fractures were comminuted distal tibia (pilon): one was B3.3, two C3.2 and a further two C3.3 using the AO system. Four out of five fractures were open Grade IIIA. Outcome was based on functional score (Olerud and Molander); SF 12 and radiological assessment. Results: There were three females and the mean age was thirty-one years. Of the five fractures, three united successfully, at eight months; one achieved a malunion and one an aseptic non-union at 1 year. Discussion: Our experience suggests complex fractures can be treated favourably with circular frames in parasuicide patients. The patients were generally compliant with frame care and the outpatient monitoring was no different from any other patient with similar injuries