Aim: Supine lateral bending radiographs are the standard methods of evaluating curve flexibility before surgery in idiopathic scoliosis. Supine traction radiographs have also been used at the authors’ institution in addition to the supine lateral bending radiographs before surgery, believing that it is usually more helpful to analyze the response of the main and compensatory curves to corrective forces. The purpose of this prospective study was to use and evaluate the results of traction radiographs taken before general anesthesia (BGA) and under general anesthesia (UGA). Material and Method: 25 patients required surgical treatment with idiopathic scoliosis were evaluated prospectively. Thirteen were female. The average age was 12.87 years. We designed a new electronic traction table in order to take the longitudinal traction and three-points lateral pressure radiographs. We situated the patient on the table and measured the patient’s weight. Then we made a longitudinal and lateral traction while asking the possible neurologic symptoms. If there was not any symptom we stopped at the seventy percent of the patient’s weight for the longitudinal and at the fifty percent for the lateral pressure. These radiographs had been taken before and under general anesthesia (UGA). The influence of the traction radiographies on the decision for surgery and its correlation with postoperative result was examined. Results: Longitudinal traction radiographs taken consciously provided the best amount of flexibility, with no significant difference from traction with the patient UGA (p = 0.17) but with significant difference from bending radiographs (p < 0.002). No significant difference was demonstrated between the traction radiographies taken before and under general anesthesia and postoperative correction (P = 0.14). Conclusion: The curve flexibility in supine traction films taken with the patient BGA was nearly equal to the curve flexibility in supine traction films taken with the patient UGA in all patients and all types of curves. Thus, there is no need to obtain a normal supine traction film for flexibility analysis under general anesthesia. By this way; the surgeons will be able to give the patient a definitive plan before surgery because the decision can be finalized after seeing the traction radiographs with the patient before the general anesthesia and operation time will be shorter

Aims. Spinal anaesthesia has seen increased use in contemporary primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). However, controversy exists about the benefits of spinal in comparison to general anaesthesia in primary TKAs. This study aimed to investigate the pain control, length of stay (LOS), and complications associated with spinal versus general anaesthesia in primary TKAs from a single, high-volume academic centre. Methods. We retrospectively identified 17,690 primary TKAs (13,297 patients) from 2001 to 2016 using our institutional total joint registry, where 52% had general anaesthesia and 48% had spinal anaesthesia. Baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts with a mean age of 68 years (SD 10), 58% female (n = 7,669), and mean BMI of 32 kg/m. 2. (SD 7). Pain was evaluated using oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) and numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) data. Complications including 30- and 90-day readmissions were studied. Data were analyzed using an inverse probability of treatment weighted model based on propensity score that included many patient and surgical factors. Mean follow-up was seven years (2 to 18). Results. Patients treated with spinal anaesthesia required fewer postoperative OMEs (p < 0.001) and had lower NPRS scores (p < 0.001). Spinal anaesthesia also had fewer cases of altered mental status (AMS; odds ratio (OR) 1.3; p = 0.044), as well as 30-day (OR 1.4; p < 0.001) and 90-day readmissions (OR 1.5; p < 0.001). General anaesthesia was associated with increased risk of any revision (OR 1.2; p = 0.021) and any reoperation (1.3; p < 0.001). Conclusion. In the largest single institutional report to date, we found that spinal anaesthesia was associated with significantly lower OME use, lower risk of AMS, and lower overall 30- and 90-day readmissions following primary TKAs. Additionally, spinal anaesthesia was associated with reduced risk of any revision and any reoperation after accounting for numerous patient and operative factors. When possible and safe, spinal anaesthesia should be considered in primary TKAs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(11):1209–1214

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the relative efficacy of regional and general anaesthesia in patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement. A comprehensive search for relevant studies was performed in PubMed (1966 to April 2008), EMBASE (1969 to April 2008) and the Cochrane Library. Only randomised studies comparing regional and general anaesthesia for total hip or knee replacement were included. We identified 21 independent, randomised clinical trials. A random-effects model was used to calculate all effect sizes. Pooled results from these trials showed that regional anaesthesia reduces the operating time (odds ratio (OR) −0.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.33 to −0.05), the need for transfusion (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.94) and the incidence of thromboembolic disease (deep-vein thrombosis OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.84; pulmonary embolism OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.80). Regional anaesthesia therefore seems to improve the outcome of patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement

Background: Traditionally, lumbar discectomy is performed under general anaesthesia because of ability to perform operations of long duration in prone position with a secure airway. Some recent reports suggest better outcomes with regional anaesthesia. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the intra-operative and short-term post-operative outcome variables in patients undergoing primary single-level lumbar discectomy with epidural and general anaesthesia. Methods: This was a prospective randomized trial involving sixty patients over a two-year period in a tertiary hospital in India. Patients were allocated into two groups: Group A (n=30) patients received general anaesthesia and Group B (n=30) patients received epidural anaesthesia. Baseline and intra-operative haemodynamic parameters, surgical duration, surgical onset time, intra-operative blood loss, cost incurred by patient, nausea and vomiting and post-operative pain score were also recorded. Results: The groups were comparable for demographic data and baseline hemodynamic observations. Patients in the epidural anaesthesia group had significantly lower blood loss (p< 0.001), lower peak pain scores (p< 0.001), lesser surgical time (p< 0.001),and significantly reduced post-operative nausea and vomiting (p< 0.01) as compared to the general anaesthesia group. The cost incurred for epidural anaesthesia was two third of that incurred in general anaesthesia (p< 0.001). Epidural group had significantly more surgical onset time (p< 0.001). Conclusion: Lumbar discectomy can be safely performed using epidural anaesthesia. The intra-operative blood loss, surgical duration, cost incurred by the patient, postoperative nausea, vomiting and pain are significantly reduced in patients receiving epidural anaesthesia, thereby leading to a significantly higher patient satisfaction. In the present climate of NHS, where any initiative to cut down the cost of resources consumed is welcomed as long as the patient safety is not compromised, epidural anaesthetic may provide an effective alternative to general anaesthetic for lumbar discectomy

Purpose: To determine if it is necessary to assess instability of the chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee under general anaesthesia. Materials and methods: 27 anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees in 27 patients were evaluated both subjectively using the Lachmanns and pivot shift test and objectively using the KT 1000 arthometer. This was done in the preoperative clinic (without the patient anaesthetised) and subsequently in the anaesthetic room with the patient anaesthetised (under general anaesthesia) prior to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The data was prospectively collected. Only data on 21 knees was available for analysis. There were 20 females and one male with an average age of 29 years. Results: There was no statistical significant difference (using students T test) between the data collected using the KT 1000 arthometer with and without the patient anaesthetised. A significant difference was noted both for the Lachmanns (p< 0.01) and pivot shift test (p< 0.001) between the results obtained with and without anaesthesia. This however did not change the management. Conclusion: Assessing the chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee using the KT 1000 arthrometer, Lachmann and pivot shift test under general anaesthesia is not necessary if these assessments have been carried out in clinic

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the mode of anaesthesia chosen for patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy surgery has any significant influence on the immediate outcome in terms of safety, efficacy or patient satisfaction. This prospective randomised study compared safety, efficacy and satisfaction levels in patients having spinal versus general anaesthesia for single level lumbar micro-discectomy. Fifty consecutive healthy and cooperative patients were recruited and prospectively randomised into two equal groups; half the patients received a spinal anaesthetic (SA), the remainder a general anaesthetic (GA). Each specific mode of anaesthesia was standardised. Comprehensive postoperative evaluation concentrated on documenting any complications specific to the particular mode of anaesthesia, recording the pace at which the various milestones of physiological and functional recovery were reached, and the level of patient satisfaction with the type of anaesthesia used. The results showed no serious complication specific to their particular mode of anaesthesia in either group. Thirteen out of 25 SA patients required temporary urinary catheterisation (9 males, 4 females) while among the GA group 4 patients required urinary catheterisation (4 males and 1 female). Post-operative pain perception was significantly lower in the SA group. The SA patients achieved the milestones of physiological and functional recovery more rapidly. While both groups were satisfied with their procedure, the level of satisfaction was significantly higher in the SA group. In conclusion, lumbar spinal microdiscectomy can be carried out with equal safety, employing either spinal or general anaesthesia. While they require more temporary urinary catheterisation associated with the previous use of intrathecal morphine, patients undergoing SA suffer less pain in association with their procedure and recover more rapidly. Blinded to an extent by not having experienced the alternative, both groups appeared satisfied with their anaesthetic. However, the level of satisfaction was significantly higher in the SA group

Purpose. The purposes of this study are as follows; 1) to compare postoperative blood loss between general anesthesia(GA) and spinal anesthesia(SA) and 2) to analyze the affecting factors of postoperative blood loss through the subgroup analysis. METHODS. A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 122 patients with osteoarthritis undergoing primary TKA between January 2012 and December 2013. According to different anesthetic method, the patients were divided into the General Anesthesia group (73 cases) and the Spinal Anesthesia group (49 cases). Each group was divided subgroup as age, BMI, Preoperative blood pressure, Surgery time, Torniquet time, INR. The total blood loss, Post Operation 1 day blood loss, hidden blood loss, and the percentage of hidden blood loss were compared between 2 groups. For the analysis of postoperative blood loss, each group was compared postoperative blood loss using hemovac drainage per day and total blood loss. In preoperative blood pressure, Higher than 140 mmHg in systolic blood pressure and higher than 90 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure were employed as a cut-off value to group the well-controlled hypertension group(n=42) and uncontrolled hypertension group(n=29). RESULTS. One day after the surgery blood loss(p=0.322) and total blood loss(p=0.560) showed no significant differences between two group. But in the uncontrolled hypertension group showed a large amount of bleeding one day after the surgery(p=0.003) and total blood loss(p=0.004) in the spinal anesthesia. CONCLUSION. It seems that, general anesthesia is effective method to reduce postoperative blood loss. Preoperative blood pressure control is one of the important affecting factor of postoperative blood loss

Introduction and Aims: Patients with proximal femoral fracture are frail with multiple comorbidities and the anaesthesia often proves a greater challenge than the surgery itself. The aim was firstly, to determine whether general, compared to regional anaesthesia, caused a decrease in the mental test score (MTS) of patients with proximal femoral fracture. Secondly, what effect does a reduced MTS have on the general outcome for such patients. Method: A prospective observational study was conducted in a regional trauma centre. One hundred and seventy consecutive patients over 60 years of age (mean age 82.6 years) were included. Age under 60 years was the only exclusion criterion. Pre- and post-operative (day five) MTS values were recorded by the same clinician. Results: The MTS decreased by 2.43 points when general anaesthesia was administered compared to 1.5 for regional anaesthesia (p< 0.01 Mann Whitney). Lower post-operative MTS values were associated with increased mortality (p< 0.001 Mann Whitney). The greater the decrease in MTS (between pre- and postoperative values) the more likely it is that the patient will be institutionalised (p< 0.01 Mann Whitney). Conclusion: Reduced mental function as observed after general anaesthesia is associated with increased mortality and institutionalisation. Thus the increased use of regional anaesthesia is advocated

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the mode of anaesthesia chosen for patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy surgery has any significant influence on the immediate outcome in terms of safety, efficacy or patient satisfaction. This prospective randomised study compared safety, efficacy and satisfaction levels in patients having spinal versus general anaesthesia for single level lumbar microdiscectomy. Fifty consecutive healthy and cooperative patients were recruited and prospectively randomised into two equal groups; half the patients received a spinal anaesthetic (SA), the remainder a general anaesthetic (GA). Each specific mode of anaesthesia was standardised. Comprehensive post-operative evaluation concentrated on documenting any complications specific to the particular mode of anaesthesia, recording the pace at which the various milestones of physiological and functional recovery were reached, and the level of patient satisfaction with the type of anaesthesia used. The results showed no serious complication specific to their particular mode of anaesthesia in either group. Thirteen out of 25 SA patients required temporary urinary catheterisation (9 males, 4 females) while among the GA group 4 patients required urinary catheterisation (4 males and 1 female). Post-operative pain perception was significantly lower in the SA group. The SA patients achieved the milestones of physiological and functional recovery more rapidly. While both groups were satisfied with their procedure, the level of satisfaction was significantly higher in the SA group. In conclusion, lumbar spinal microdiscectomy can be carried out with equal safety, employing either spinal or general anaesthesia. While they require more temporary urinary catheterisation associated with the previous use of intrathecal morphine, patients undergoing SA suffer less pain in association with their procedure and recover more rapidly. Blinded to an extent by not having experienced the alternative, both groups appeared satisfied with their anaesthetic. However, the level of satisfaction was significantly higher in the SA group

Our aim in this prospective radiological study was to determine whether the flexibility rate calculated from radiographs obtained during forced traction under general anaesthesia, was better than that of fulcrum-bending radiographs before corrective surgery in predicting the extent of the available correction in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. We evaluated 33 patients with a Cobb angle > 60° on a standing posteroanterior radiograph, who had been treated by posterior correction. Pre-operative standing fulcrum-bending radiographs and those with forced-traction under general anaesthesia were obtained. Post-operative standing radiographs were taken after surgical correction. The mean forced-traction flexibility rate was 55% (. sd. 11.3) which was significantly higher than the mean fulcrum-bending flexibility rate of 32% (. sd. 16.1) (p < 0.001). We found no correlation between either the forced-traction or fulcrum-bending flexibility rates and the correction rate post-operatively (p = 0.24 and p = 0.44, respectively). Radiographs obtained during forced traction under general anaesthesia were better at predicting the flexibility of the curve than fulcrum-bending radiographs in curves with a Cobb angle > 60° in the standing position and may identify those patients for whom supplementary anterior surgery can be avoided

Enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, has been used together with spinal or general anaesthesia in a prospective, randomised study of 188 consecutive elective hip replacements. Bilateral venography was performed on all patients on day 13 after operation. Group I (65 patients) received spinal anaesthesia and no immediate injection of enoxaparin. Group II (61 patients) received spinal anaesthesia and 20 mg of enoxaparin one hour after the onset of anaesthesia. Group III (62 patients) was operated on under general anaesthesia and received 40 mg of enoxaparin 12 hours prior to surgery. This group acted as the control group. In all three groups, 40 mg of enoxaparin was given 12 hours after the end of surgery and continued on a once-daily basis. Proximal DVT occurred in 6% of group I, 6.7% of group II and 6.5% of group III, not a significant difference. Distal DVT was present in 11% of group I, 5% of group II and 0% of group III; this was a highly significant difference (p = 0.007). Tolerance was good and the incidence of bleeding low in the three groups. Our results confirm the low rate of DVT in patients operated on under general anaesthesia with the standard procedure of 40 mg of enoxaparin on a once-daily basis started pre-operatively. The 40 mg-dose is also safe and effective in association with spinal anaesthesia if half the dose (20 mg) is injected an hour after the lumbar puncture

The effect of hypobaric spinal anaesthesia or narcotic-halothane-relaxant general anaesthesia on the incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis was studied in 140 elective total hip replacements in a prospective randomised manner. Deep vein thrombosis was diagnosed using impedance plethysmography and the 125I fibrinogen uptake test, combined, in selected cases, with ascending contrast venography. The overall incidence of deep vein thrombosis was 20%. Nine patients (13%) developed deep vein thrombosis in the spinal group and nineteen (27%) in the general anaesthetic group (p less than 0.05). The incidences of proximal thrombosis and of bilateral thrombi were also less with spinal anaesthesia than with general anaesthesia. It is concluded that spinal anaesthesia reduces the risks of postoperative thromboembolism in hip replacement surgery. The presence of varicose veins, being a non-smoker and having a low body mass index were associated with an increased incidence of deep vein thrombosis

Purpose. The pros and cons of general anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia in total hip arthroplasty has been a long debated topic. The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical times, blood loss and transfusion requirements between anesthetic types in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. Method. A consecutive series of 1600 THA procedures with complete preoperative and postoperative data were evaluated. Twenty eight percent of procedures were performed with a general anesthetic (GA), 67% with a spinal anesthetic (SP) and 5% with a combination of the two. Outcomes were compared and tested for significance using the Independent Samples Kruskal Wallis or Pearson Chi-Square analysis. Results. Comparing GA and SP respectively, there was a statistically significant difference in patient age between the groups (age 63.73 14.5 vs 66.6 12.8, p<0.05), but not in ASA scores and distribution, or preoperative hemoglobin levels (131.74 32.5 vs 133.21 28.9). There was a statistically significant difference in length of time proceeding surgical procedure favoring Generals (SP: 35 mins (10 72) vs GA: 30 mins (8 65), p<0.05), however overall time in room was longer in Generals (GA: 132.83 29.0 vs SP: 127.15 22.5). There was a statistically significant difference in discharge hemoglobin favoring Spinals (SP: 97.9 14.2 vs GA: 94.9 16.4, p<0.05), lower transfusion rates (SP: 8.4% vs GA: 14.0%, p<0.05) and shorter length of stay (SP: 4.9 days vs GA: 5.3 days, p<0.05). The patients receiving a combination of anesthetic had a significantly greater length of time prior to proceeding the surgical procedure (43 mins (20 145)) and overall time in room (142.85 27.2) compared to both GA and SP, however were similar in all other outcomes. Conclusion. In this consecutive series of patients undergoing general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia and a combination for total hip arthroplasty, the general anesthesia cohort demonstrated advantages in statistically significantly shorter time proceeding the surgical procedure, however the overall procedure time was significantly longer. The spinal group had less blood loss and lower transfusion rates and the combination group had statistically longer procedure times compared to both GA and SP

The aim was to compare the efficacy and outcomes of reduction of closed forearm fractures in a paediatric population using Ketamine in the Emergency Department (ED) setting versus reduction under general anaesthesia (GA) in the operating theatre (OT). A prospective audit of children presenting to our institution with closed fractures of the radius and/or ulna was conducted. Patients presenting to ED were offered manipulation under GA or Ketamine, and then grouped accordingly. Children were followed up until full range of motion had recovered. Outcomes measured at follow up were 1) need for remanipulation, 2) position at union, 3) total hospital stay and 4) functional outcome. Forearm fractures account for 22% of acute paediatric orthopaedic admissions to our institution. 70% require manipulation and splintage. 221 forearm fractures required manipulation during the study period. 90 patients (41%) were manipulated under Ketamine in the ED, 131 patients (59%) were manipulated in the OT. There was no significant difference in mean angulation of fractures treated by either method (p=0.20). There was no significant difference between the two methods with respect to rates of remanipulation (p=0.73) or poor position at union (p=0.55). There was a significantly shorter hospital stay for those treated in the ED. Treatment of paediatric forearm fractures in the ED under Ketamine sedation offers an effective alternative for selected fractures. It also offers considerable financial savings and is less of a drain on valuable theatre and staff resources

Objective. Compare the safety and effectiveness of different anesthetic technique used in the simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA). Methods. Medical records of patients admitted for simultaneous BTKA between January 1, 2014 and September 1, 2015 in ‘The safety and effect evaluation of joint arthroplasty’ database were analyzed. The general anesthesia (GA) and neuraxial anesthesia (NA) group were identified. Patient preoperative characteristics were compared. Perioperative outcomes measured included operating time, blood loss, transfusion requirement, length of hospitalization, joint range of motion at discharge, complications. Results. A total of 1191 patients from 25 hospitals were identified, 802 (67.34%) patients were performed under GA, and 389 (32.66%) patients were performed under NA. Patients characteristics were similar between the two groups (P<0.05), except that patients operated under NA were older than those under GA (P<0.01). NA was associated with significantly less overall complications and infection complications, and reduction of length of hospitalization (P<0.05). But operating time, blood loss, transfusion requirement, joint range of motion at discharge were similar between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion. Patients who underwent simultaneous BTKA under NA had shorter hospitalization, lower overall complication and infection complication rate than GA. And, it could have an important medical and economic impact on health-care practice

Aims

Although periarticular injection plays an important role in multimodal pain management following total hip arthroplasty (THA), there is no consensus on the optimal composition of the injection. In particular, it is not clear whether the addition of a corticosteroid improves the pain relief achieved nor whether it is associated with more complications than are observed without corticosteroid. The aim of this study was to quantify the safety and effectiveness of cortocosteroid use in periarticular injection during THA.

Introduction

Methoxyflurane can cause hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity at anaesthetic doses but has excellent analgesic properties and no nephrotoxic effects in patients without preexisting disease. Approved for use in the UK and Ireland in 2015, it is currently being used in emergency departments for analgesia during fracture reduction. During the Covid emergency, with theatre access severely restricted and many patients unwilling to use inhaled Nitrous oxide, Penthrox had the potential to provide adequate pain relief to aid frame removals and minor procedures in the clinic.

The June 2024 Trauma Roundup. 360. looks at: Skin antisepsis before surgical fixation of limb fractures; Comparative analysis of intramedullary nail versus plate fixation for fibula fracture in supination external rotation type IV ankle injury; Early weightbearing versus late weightbearing after intramedullary nailing for distal femoral fracture (AO/OTA 33) in elderly patients: a multicentre propensity-matched study; Long-term outcomes with spinal versus general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery; Operative versus nonoperative management of unstable medial malleolus fractures: a randomized clinical trial; Impact of smoking status on fracture-related infection characteristics and outcomes; Reassessing empirical antimicrobial choices in fracture-related infections; Development and validation of the Nottingham Trauma Frailty Index (NTFI) for older trauma patients

Displaced fractures of the distal radius in children are usually reduced under sedation or general anaesthesia to restore anatomical alignment before the limb is immobilized. However, there is growing evidence of the ability of the distal radius to remodel rapidly, raising doubts over the benefit to these children of restoring alignment. There is now clinical equipoise concerning whether or not young children with displaced distal radial fractures benefit from reduction, as they have the greatest ability to remodel. The Children’s Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial (CRAFFT), funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research, aims to definitively answer this question and determine how best to manage severely displaced distal radial fractures in children aged up to ten years. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(1):16–18

The June 2024 Hip & Pelvis Roundup. 360. looks at: Machine learning did not outperform conventional competing risk modelling to predict revision arthroplasty; Unravelling the risks: incidence and reoperation rates for femoral fractures post-total hip arthroplasty; Spinal versus general anaesthesia for hip arthroscopy: a COVID-19 pandemic- and opioid epidemic-driven study; Development and validation of a deep-learning model to predict total hip arthroplasty on radiographs; Ambulatory centres lead in same-day hip and knee arthroplasty success; Exploring the impact of smokeless tobacco on total hip arthroplasty outcomes: a deeper dive into postoperative complications