Abstract. Background. 1. 63,284 patients presented with neck of femur fractures in England in 2020 (NHFD report 2021)2. To maximise theatre efficiency during the first wave of COVID-19, NHSE guidance recommended the use of HA for most patients requiring arthroplasty.3. The literature reports an incidence of Hemiarthroplasty dislocations of 1–15%. Aims. 1. To study the number and possible causes of dislocations in patients with Primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture neck of femur2. To compare our data with national and international data in terms of dislocation and revision rates for Hemiarthroplasty. Methods. Retrospective study Duration- 1st April 2021–31st March 20223. Inclusion criteria- Patients with neck of femur fracture treated with Hemiarthroplasty. Exclusion criteria- Patients treated with other surgical options for neck of femur fractures. Results. 1. No. of neck of femur patients- 4442. No. of patients treated with Hemiarthroplasty- 2143. No. of dislocations- 44. 75% were female, 75% had AMTS>7, 50% were operated within 36 hours of trauma, 75% dislocated within a month of surgery, 75% of the dislocations were revised. 5. One dislocation was due to >72 hour delay to surgery, second dislocation was due to smaller offset and shortening, third was due to acetabular dysplasia, fourth was due to larger head used. Discussion-1. Our 1.86% dislocation rate matches that in the literature of 1–6%2. 75% dislocated within a month of surgery matches that in the literature that maximum dislocations occur within one month. 3. Closed reduction as definitive method of management of dislocation 25% matches that in the literature of 22–25%4. 75% dislocations revised similar to literature of 75–80% revision rate. Conclusion. Pre-operative templating can reduce surgical error involving limb length discrepancy and shortening to prevent dislocations. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Hip precautions are currently practiced in three-quarters of trauma hospitals in the UK, despite national recommendations from the ‘Blue Book’ not stating it as a requirement. Valuable therapist time is utilised alongside the need for specialised equipment, which can potentially delay discharge whilst it is being arranged. Objective of this study was to explore the current practice of the use of hip precautions on discharge following hemiarthroplasty for hip fractures. To also explore whether they are necessary and to identify areas for improvement to benefit patient care overall. Online survey distributed to various Trauma and Orthopaedic Departments across the UK. Survey was available over a 4-month period, collecting 55 responses overall. Majority of responses were from trauma and orthopaedic consultants who were aware of the ‘Blue Book’ recommendations. The majority of trusts who responded did not practice hip precautions and did not feel this increased the risk of dislocations on discharge. Recommendations included integration of hip precautions in the post-op advice in coordination with the physiotherapist and information leaflets on discharge regarding hip precautions. Hip precautions were not commonly practiced, for reasons including patient compliance and the inherently stable procedure of a hemiarthroplasty compared to a THR, reducing the need for hip precautions. Hip precautions are not widely regarded as a useful practice for post-hip hemiarthroplasty, viewed as utilising more resources and increasing costs and risk due to increased hospital stay. Thus, this potentially delays discharge overall. A consistent approach should be implemented in treating patients post-hip hemiarthroplasty

Introduction and Objective. Dislocation of a hip hemiarthroplasty is a significant complication with a high mortality rate in elderly patients. Previous studies have shown a higher risk of dislocation in patients with neuromuscular conditions. In this study, we reviewed our larger cohort of patients to identify if there is a link between neuromuscular disorders and dislocation of hip hemiarthroplasty in patients with neuromuscular conditions. Materials and Methods. We have retrospectively analysed a single-centre data that was collected over 34 years for patients with intracapsular neck of femur fracture who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty. The study population was composed of four groups: patients with no neuromuscular disorders, patients with Parkinson's disease, patients with previous stroke, and patients with mental impairment. Results. A total of 3827 patients were included in the analysis. 3371 patients had no neuromuscular condition (Group I) with a dislocation rate of 1.1%. 219 patients had Parkinsonism (Group II) with a dislocation rate of 3.2%, 104 patients had a previous stroke with weakness on the fracture side with a dislocation rate of 1.0% (Group III), and 984 patients had severe mental impairment with a dislocation rate of 1.8% (Group IV). The increased dislocation rate for those with Parkinson's disease was statistically significant (p=0.02) while none of the other neuromuscular conditions were statistically significant. Conclusions. Our study has shown an increased risk of dislocation of hemiarthroplasty in patients with Parkinson's disease in comparison to other groups. No increase was apparent for patients with mental impairment or weakness from a previous stroke

Between 2016–2019, 4 patients developed hip infections post-hemiarthroplasty. However, between 2020–2021 (Covid-19 pandemic period), 6 patients developed hip infections following hip hemiarthroplasty. The purpose of the investigation is to establish the root causes and key learning from the incident and use the information contained within this report to reduce the likelihood of a similar incident in the future. 65 patients presented with a neck of femur fracture during Covid-19 pandemic period between 2020–2021, 26 had hip hemiarthroplasty of which 6 developed hip infections. Medical records, anaesthetic charts and post-hip infections guidelines from RCS and NICE were utilised. Proteus, Enterococci and Strep. epidermis were identified as the main organisms present causing the hip infection. The average number of ward moves was 4 with 90% of patients developing COVID-19 during their hospital stay. The chance of post-operative wound infection were multifactorial. Having had 5 of 6 patients growing enterococci may suggest contamination of wound either due to potential suboptimal hygiene measures, inadequate wound management /dressing, potential environmental contamination if the organisms (Vancomycin resistant enterococci) are found to be of same types and potential hospital acquired infection due to inadequate infection control measures or suboptimal hand hygiene practices. 3 of the 5 patients grew Proteus, which points towards suboptimal hygiene practices by patients or poor infection control practices by staff. Lack of maintenance of sterility in post op wound dressings alongside inexperience of the handling of post-operative wound in non-surgical wards; multiple ward transfers exceeding the recommended number according to trust guidelines especially due to pandemic isolation measures and COVID-19 infection itself had resulted in an increased rate of hip infections during the COVID-19 pandemic. Multidisciplinary team education and planned categorisation and isolation strategy is essential to minimise the rate of further hip infections during the pandemic period in future

Abstract. Objectives. Current use of hard biomaterials such as cobalt-chrome alloys or ceramics to articulate against the relatively soft, compliant native cartilage surface reduces the joint contact area by up to two thirds. This gives rise to high and abnormal loading conditions which promotes degradation and erosion of the mating cartilage leading to pain, stiffness, and loss of function. Biomimetic soft lubrication strategies have been developed by grafting hydrophilic polymers onto substrates to form a gel-type surface. Surface grafted gels mimic the natural mechanisms of friction dissipation in synovial joints, showing a promising potential for use in hemiarthroplasty. This project aims to develop implant surfaces with properties tailored to match articular cartilage to retain and promote natural joint function ahead of total joint replacement. Methods. Four different types of monomers were grafted in a one-step photopolymerisation procedure onto polished PEEK substrates. The functionalised surfaces were investigated using surface wettability, FTIR, and simplified 2D-tribometry tests against glass and animal cartilage specimens to assess their lubricity and mechanical properties for hemiarthroplasty articulations. Results. Polymer functionalised surfaces under different grafting conditions were assessed for their wettability, graft density and quality. A reduction in water contact angle from 90° to < 20° was seen for functionalised highly hydrophilic PEEK surfaces. Similarly a reduction in the coefficient of friction (and subsequently shear stresses acting on cartilage) of 95% to ∼ 10. −2. was seen for functionalised PEEK surfaces slid against glass and cartilage in PBS. Conclusions. Development of this technology has the potential to vastly improve the performance of hemiarthroplasty. Providing earlier and targeted interventions for degenerative joint disease whilst preserving the function of the remaining healthy cartilage. Future work will concern using these promising hydrated functionalised surface architectures as focal cartilage deflects plugs along with long-term performance and suitability for implantation assessments using joint simulator testing

Introduction and Objective. Interest for direct anterior approach (DAA) in hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) has greatly increased in recent years, however which is the best surgical approach in hip replacement treating femoral neck fractures (FNFs) is already unclear. The aim of this study is to perform a radiographic and perioperative complications analysis by comparing the direct anterior approach (DAA) with the direct lateral approach (DLA) in patients treated with hemiarthroplasty for FNFs. Materials and Methods. Patients with FNFs surgically treated between 2016–2020 with HHA were enrolled. The radiographical outcomes of DAA and DLA are compared. Several peri-operative and post-operative variables were evaluated: mean surgery time, complications as periprosthetic fractures or episodes of dislocation, the average of post-operative diaphyseal filling of the stem (Canal Fill Index, CFI), the extent of heterotopic ossification (HO) (simplified Broker classification) and metadiaphiseal bone loss (Paprosky classification) within one year from surgery. Results. 86 patients underwent HHA by DAA and 80 patients by DLA. The two groups are qualitatively comparable. No statistically significate differences were showed in all variables analyzed (p>0.05). The average of surgical time of DAA were 61 minutes compared to 67 of DLA. No differences were showed in the post-operative CFI (DAA 0.71 ± 6.1; DLA 0.76 ± 13.5), the extent of the HO (DAA 79.07% low; DLA 75% low) and metadiaphiseal bone loss (DAA Grade I 91.86%; DLA Grade I 93.75%). Regarding perioperative complications, we have discovered only one periprosthetic fracture each group. Although there was no statistically significant difference, we highlighted a higher number of dislocations in the group of DLA (2 episodes vs no one). Conclusions. In this study we have shown that the DAA is an adequate surgical choice comparing with the classical DLA for FNFs treated with HHA. The analysis of our radiographic parameters and perioperative complications have not shown a significant difference between the two surgical approach. This study is limited by a purely radiographic analysis without addition of clinical parameters

Contrary to NICE guidance there remains a role for Austin-Moore hemiarthroplasty (AM) for patients with significant pre-existing comorbidities who are at higher risk of death and complications following cemented hemiarthroplasty. We analysed prospectively-collected data comparing uncemented AM hemiarthroplasty in frail, poorly-mobile patients, and cemented hemiarthroplasty. We analysed age, pre-operative morbidity, duration of operation, death rate and complication rate. AM patients were significantly older with significantly higher ASA grades. It took significantly longer to optimise them before surgery. AM was significantly shorter to perform. There was no significant difference in complications requiring re-operation. Twice as many AM patients developed post-operative pneumonia despite absence of cement. Twice as many AM patients died after surgery and a significant proportion died within the first month despite no increased risk of repeat operation, shorter operating time and no risk of cement-disease. We infer that these patients would likely have fared badly had they undergone a longer, cemented procedure. A modern cemented prosthesis costs £691 more than AM. There exists a subset of patients within the neck of femur cohort who are significantly more unwell. Contrary to guidelines, we suggest that the cheaper, user-friendly Austin-Moore can be a reasonable prosthesis to use for this cohort

This study compared the effect of a computer-assisted and a traditional surgical technique on the kinematics of the glenohumeral joint during passive abduction after hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder for the treatment of fractures. We used seven pairs of fresh-frozen cadaver shoulders to create simulated four-part fractures of the proximal humerus, which were then reconstructed with hemiarthroplasty and reattachment of the tuberosities. The specimens were randomised, so that one from each pair was repaired using the computer-assisted technique, whereas a traditional hemiarthroplasty without navigation was performed in the contralateral shoulder. Kinematic data were obtained using an electromagnetic tracking device. The traditional technique resulted in posterior and inferior translation of the humeral head. No statistical differences were observed before or after computer-assisted surgery. Although it requires further improvement, the computer-assisted approach appears to allow glenohumeral kinematics to more closely replicate those of the native joint, potentially improving the function of the shoulder and extending the longevity of the prosthesis

Abstract. Objectives. Up to 19% of patients who undergo surgery for an acute hip fracture are readmitted to the hospital within three months of the index operation. We aimed to identify risk factors for unplanned clinic attendance, readmission, and mortality within the first 12 months postoperatively and subsequently determine if there is a role for routine follow-up. Methods. Patients greater than 65 years old who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty using an uncemented Thompson implant for treatment of a traumatic non-pathological hip fracture were identified from a prospectively maintained database at a single institution between August 2007 and February 2011. Patient demographics, comorbidities, place of residence, mobility status, unplanned attendance to an orthopaedic clinic with symptoms relating to the respective limb, readmission, and mortality were recorded. Results. Five hundred and fifty-four consecutive patients were identified. Unplanned clinic attendance was correlated to age (p = 0.000, B = −0.0159, 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.200 to −0.65), with patients between the ages of 65 – 70 years most likely to require unplanned clinic review postoperatively. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (p = 0.019, 95% CI: 0.014 to 0.163) and frequency of unplanned outpatient attendance (p = 0.000, 95% CI: 0.120 to 0.284) were significantly associated with increased readmission within 12 months of the index procedure with patients who were regarded as ASA > 2 most likely to require readmission within the first postoperative year. Conclusion. To our knowledge, this is the first piece of research that identifies causative factors for unplanned clinic attendance and acute readmission during the first postoperative year in acute hip fracture patients treated by hemiarthroplasty. Routine scheduled follow-up of patients based on risk stratification may be effective in reducing the financial burden of unplanned clinic attendance. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Background. Severe hallux rigidus can be treated with total or hemi arthroplasty to preserve motion in the 1st metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ). Decreased dorsiflexion impairs the rollover motion of the 1st MTPJ and recent studies of patients with 1st MTPJ osteoarthritis show increased plantar forces on the hallux. Objectives. Our aim was to examine the plantar force variables under the hallux and the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd – 5th distal metatarsal head (MH) on patients operated with a proximal hemiarthroplasty (HemiCap) in the 1st MTPJ and compare to a control group of healthy patients. Secondary aims: To examine correlations between the force and the 1st MTPJ range of motion (ROM) and pain. Study Design & Methods. Seventy patients operated with HemiCap were invited. 41 were included, (10 men, 31 women), median operation date 2011(range 2007–2014), age 63(47–78), 37 unilateral and 4 bilateral. Dorsal ROM of the 1st MTPJ was measured by goniometer and by x-ray. Pain evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS 1–10) during daily activities (DA) and during testing (DT). Emed (Novel) Foot Pressure Mapping system was used to measure peak force (N) and force/time integral (N/s) under the hallux, 1st and 2nd and 3–5th metatarsal heads (MH). Statistics: Force variables between operated feet and control group were compared by independent two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Force variables association to ROM and pain by linear regression models. Results. Median (range) for HemiCap/Control group: Peak force (N): Hallux: 12(1–26)/20(4–30), 1st MH: 17(8–41)/24(14–42), 2nd MH 24(15–37)/28(24–37), 3rd–5th MH: 27(18–36)/30(25–35). Force/time integral (N/s): Hallux: 1(1–4)/4(1–12), 1st MH: 5(2–18)/7(3–11), 2nd MH 8(4–13)/10(7–13), 3rd–5th MH: 9(6–15)/10(8–14). Significant difference between HemiCap patients and healthy controls in peak force and force/time integral was found under the hallux (p<0.01), 1st (p<0.05) and 2nd MH (p<0.05), and max force under the 3–5th MH (p<0.01). Dorsal ROM of the operated feet was 45 degrees (10–75) by goniometer and 41 degrees (16–70) by x-ray. An increase in dorsal ROM decreased the peak force and force/time integral under the hallux (p>0.05) but not under the MHs. Most patients reported no pain (VAS 1: 62% DA, 78% DT), only 2 patients reported VAS>3. No significant correlation between pain and force or force/time integral. Conclusions. A mid-term hemiarthroplasty do not restore the joint motion to normal. The loading patterns are in opposition to AO patients as as assfgjkdfgjkfdgjk the HemiCap patients show a significantly decreased peak force and force/time integral under the hallux compared to the control group and the larger the dorsiflexion achieved postoperatively the smaller the force/time integral becomes. It may reflect a patient reluctance to load the 1st ray and 2nd MH. The plantar forces are not linked to pain. Most report minimal pain, but the pain score is biased by missing numbers and exclusion of revisions

Abstract

The surgical treatment options for patients who have sustained an intra-capsular hip fracture can vary depending on a number of patient and fracture related factors. Currently most national guidelines support the use of cemented prostheses for patient undergoing hemiarthroplasty surgery. Uncemented prostheses are commonly used for a variety of indications including those patients who have significant medical co-morbidities. To determine whether cemented hemiarthroplasty is associated with a higher post operative mortality when compared to uncemented procedures. Data were extracted from the Scottish SMR01 database from 01/04/1997 from all patients who were admitted to hospital after sustaining a hip fracture. We investigated mortality at day 1,2,4,7,30, 120 and 1 year from surgery vs. that on day 0. In order to control for the effects of confounding variables between patients cohorts, 12 case-mix variable were used to construct a multivariable logistic regression analysis model to determine the independent effect of prosthesis design. There were 52283 patients included in the study. Mortality for osteosynthesis of extra-capsular fractures was consistently lower when compared to that for surgical procedures for intra-capsular fractures. At day 0, uncemented hemiarthroplasty had a lower associated mortality (p<0.001) when compared to cemented implant designs. However, this increased mortality was equal to 1 extra death per 2000 procedures. From day 1 onward mortality for cemented procedures was equal to or lower than that of uncemented. By day 4, cumulative mortality was less for cemented than for uncemented procedures. Complication and re-operation rate was significantly higher in the uncemented cohort. The use of uncemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of intra-capsular hip fractures cannot be justified in terms of early/late post-operative mortality

Recent National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance has advised against the continued use of the Thompson implant when performing hip hemiarthroplasty and recommended surgeons consider using the anterolateral surgical approach over a posterior approach. Our objective was to review outcomes from a consecutive series of Thompson hip hemiarthroplasty procedures performed in our unit and to identify any factors predicting the risk of complications. 807 Thompson hip hemiarthroplasty cases performed between April 2008 and November 2013 were reviewed. 721 (89.3%) were cemented and 86 (10.7%) uncemented. 575 (71.3%) were performed in female patients. The anterolateral approach was performed in 753 (93.3%) and the posterior approach with enhanced soft tissue repair in 54 (6.7%). Overall, there were 23 dislocations (2.9%). Dislocation following the posterior approach occurred in 13.0% (7 of 54) in comparison to 2.1% (16 of 753) with the anterolateral approach (odds ratio (OR) 8.5 (95% CI 2.8 to 26.3) p < 0.001). Surgeon grade and patient history of cognitive impairment did not have a significant impact on dislocation rate. Patients were discharged home in 459 cases (56.9%), to a care home or other hospital in 273 cases (33.8%). 51.8% (338 of 653) returned home within 30 days. 75 died during their admission (9.3%). 30-day mortality was 7.1% and 1-year mortality was 16.6%. Intraoperative fracture occurred in 15 cases (1.9%) of which 14 were cemented. Superficial or deep infection occurred in 33 cases (4.1%). We recommend against the continued use of the posterior approach in hip hemiarthroplasty, as enhanced soft tissue repair did not reduce dislocation rates to an acceptable level. Our findings, however, demonstrate satisfactory results for patients treated with the Thompson hip hemiarthroplasty performed through an anterolateral approach. We suggest that the continued use of the Thompson implant in a carefully selected patient cohort is justifiable

The ‘cement reaction’ is a recognised cardio-respiratory response to methylmethacrylate bone cement, characterised by hypotension, reduced cardiac output, and on occasion fatal circulatory collapse. It is seen in 0.5-1% of cemented hip arthroplasties during the insertion and pressurisation of cement into the femur, and is believed to be secondary to marrow thromboembolism, the vasodilatory effect of methylmethacrylate, or a combination of the two. A number of steps, within the operating surgeon's control, can be undertaken to reduce the risk of the ‘cement reaction’ occurring. An e-mail based questionnaire was sent to all trainees and consultants in the West of Scotland containing eight questions relating to cementing technique when performing hemiarthroplasty of the hip. The questions related to measures to reduce the potential for ‘cement reaction’, e.g.: whether or not they routinely use a cement restrictor. Seventy-two complete replies were received. For five of the eight measures, the surgeons routinely employed the suggested practices. For the remaining three, the consensus opinion was contrary to the suggested practice for reduction of the risk of ‘cement reaction’. These were with respect to the surgical approach employed, whether or not to attempt to remove all cancellous bone from the proximal femur, and the use, or not, of a venting tube during cement insertion. In all three cases, the difference was statistically significant on chi-squared testing. The cohort of surgeons questioned routinely employ more than half of the methods suggested to reduce the potential for ‘cement reaction’ in hemiarthroplasty of the hip. Further surveys of why they do, or do not, undertake certain practices during cementing would help improve awareness of ‘cement reaction’, and perhaps reduce the incidence of this potentially fatal phenomenon

The use of a composite osteochondral device for simulating partial hemiarthroplasty was examined. The device was composed of a polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel and a titanium fibre mesh, acting as artificial cartilage and as porous artificial bone, respectively. The titanium fibre mesh was designed to act as an interface material, allowing firm attachment to both the polyvinyl alcohol gel (through injection moulding) and the femoral joint surface (through bony ingrowth). We implanted 22 of these devices into canine femoral heads. Histological findings from the acetabular cartilage and synovial membrane, as well as the attachment of the prosthesis to bone, were examined up until one year after operation. No marked pathological changes were found and firm attachment of the device to the underlying bone was confirmed. The main potential application for this device is for partial surface replacement of the femoral head after osteonecrosis. Other applications could include articular resurfacing and the replacement of intervertebral discs

Currently, the cement being used for hemiarthroplasties and total hip replacements by the authors and many other surgeons in the UK is Palacos® (containing 0.5g Gentamicin). Similar cement, Copal® (containing 1g Gentamicin and 1g Clindamycin) has been used in revision arthroplasties, and has shown to be better at inhibiting bacterial growth and biofilm formation. We aim to investigate the effect on SSI rates of doubling the gentamicin dose and adding a second antibiotic (clindamycin) to the bone cement in hip hemiarthroplasty. We randomised 848 consecutive patients undergoing cemented hip hemiarthroplasty for fractured NOF at one NHS trust (two sites) into two groups: Group I, 464 patients, received standard cement (Palacos®) and Group II, 384 patients, received high dose, double antibiotic-impregnated cement (Copal®). We calculated the SSI rate for each group at 30 days post-surgery. The patients, reviewers and statistician were blinded as to treatment group. The demographics and co-morbid conditions (known to increase risk of infection) were statistically similar between the groups. The combined superficial and deep SSI rates were 5 % (20/394) and 1.7% (6/344) for groups I and II respectively (p=0.01). Group I had a deep infection rate 3.3 %(13/394) compared to 1.16% (4/344) in group II (p=0.082). Group I had a superficial infection rate 1.7 % (7/394) compared to 0.58% (2/344) in group II (p=0.1861). 33(4%) patients were lost to follow up, and 77 (9%) patients were deceased at the 30 day end point. There was no statistical difference in the 30 day mortality, C. difficile infection, or the renal failure rates between the two groups. Using high dose double antibiotic-impregnated cement rather than standard low dose antibiotic-impregnated cement significantly reduced the SSI rate (1.7% vs 5%; p=0.01) after hip hemiarthroplasty for fractured neck of femur in this prospective randomised controlled trial

Abstract

The surgical treatment options for patients who have sustained an intra-capsular hip fracture can vary depending on a number of patient and fracture related factors. Currently most national guidelines support the use of cemented prostheses for patient undergoing hemi-arthroplasty surgery. Uncemented prostheses are commonly used for a variety of indications including those patients who have significant medical co-morbidities. To determine whether cemented hemi-arthroplasty is associated with a higher post operative mortality when compared to uncemented procedures. Data was extracted from the Scottish SMR01 database from 01/04/1997 from all patients who were admitted to hospital after sustaining a hip fracture. We investigated mortality at day 1, 2, 4, 7, 30, 120 and 1 year from surgery vs. that on day 0. In order to control for the effects of confounding variables between patients cohorts, 12 case-mix variable were used to construct a multivariable logistic regression analysis model to determine the independent effect of prosthesis fixation method. There were 64,979 patients were included in the study. Mortality for osteosynthesis of extra-capsular fractures was consistently lower when compared to that for surgical procedures for intra-capsular fractures. At day 0, uncemented hemi-arthroplasty operations had a lower associated mortality (p<0.001) when compared to cemented implant designs. Unadjusted figures showed an increased mortality equal to 1 extra death per 424 procedures. By day 1 this had become 1 extra death per 338 procedures. By day 7 cumulative mortality was less for cemented than for uncemented procedures though this did not reach significance until day 120. When compared to uncemented fixation techniques, cemented hemiarthroplasty is associated with a higher mortality in the immediate postoperative period. However, by day 120 and beyond the trend is reversed

Summary Statement. Total hip arthroplasty and hemi-arthroplasty are becoming increasingly popular in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the United States. Both appear to be safe and effective treatment options, with rare acute adverse events and low mortality. Introduction. Femoral neck fractures are one of the most frequent orthopaedic injuries seen in the United States (US). Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) are commonly used to treat displaced intra-capsular femoral neck fractures, but controversy currently exists regarding the preferred modality. The purpose of this study was to assess recent national trends in THA and HA performed for femoral neck fracture and to evaluate perioperative outcomes for each treatment group. Methods. International Classification of Disease - 9th Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis codes were used to search the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) for all patients admitted to US hospitals after femoral neck fracture for each year between 2001 and 2010. ICD-9 procedure codes were then used to identify patients from this fracture population who underwent THA or HA. Data regarding patient demographics, hospitalization length, discharge disposition, in-hospital adverse events (pulmonary embolus, deep vein thrombosis, blood transfusion, mortality) and hospital size/location were gathered from the NHDS. Trends were evaluated by linear regression with Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) and statistical comparisons were made using Student's t-test, z-test for proportions, and chi-square analysis with a significance level of 0.05. Results. 12,757 patients with a femoral neck fracture were identified. 582 (4.6%) were treated with THA and 6,697 (52.5%) received HA. After adjusting for fluctuations in annual fracture incidence, the use of THA to treat femoral neck fractures demonstrated a strong positive correlation with time (r=0.91), significantly increasing from an average rate of 4.2% between 2001–2005 to 5.0% between 2006–2010 (p=0.04). Similarly, the use of HA demonstrated a strong positive correlation with time (r=0.89) and significantly increased from an average rate of 51.0% to 54.7% (p<0.01). The frequency of THA use also demonstrated significant (p=0.01) differences based on US region, with a rate of 3.3% in the West region and 5.2% in the South. No regional differences were seen for HA (p=0.07). Hospital size significantly impacted HA use, with the lowest rate seen in hospitals under 100 beds (47.4%) and the highest rate in those with 200–299 beds (56.0%, p<0.01). No size differences were seen for THA (p=0.10). The THA group had a mean patient age of 76.9 years and included 164 men and 418 women. The HA group had a mean patient age that was significantly higher at 81.1 years (p<0.01) and included 1744 men and 4953 women. Gender was not significantly different (p=0.27) between the groups. Average hospitalization length was significantly longer for THA (7.8 days, range 1–312) compared to HA (6.7 days, range 1–118, p<0.01). Discharge disposition also varied by treatment group, with 23.2% of THA patients able to go directly home compared to only 11.6% of HA patients (p<0.01). Blood transfusion rate was significantly higher for THA (30.4%) compared to HA (25.7%, p=0.02). No significant difference was noted between THA and HA in regards to rate of PE (0.5% versus 0.7%, p=0.52), rate of DVT (1.2% versus 0.8%, p=0.50) or mortality (1.8% versus 2.9%, p=0.09). Discussion/Conclusion. This study demonstrates that the use of THA and HA in the treatment of femoral neck fractures are rising and that both are safe and effective treatment options, with equally rare acute adverse events and low mortality. Interestingly, treatment choice demonstrated variability based on hospital region and size. The reasons for this are not immediately clear, but may be related to differences in regional training and availability of trauma/reconstruction subspecialists