High-flexion total knee replacement (TKR) designs have been introduced to improve flexion after TKR. Although the early results of such designs were promising, recent literature has raised concerns about the incidence of early loosening of the femoral component. We compared the minimum force required to cause femoral component loosening for six high-flexion and six conventional TKR designs in a laboratory experiment. Each TKR design was implanted in a femoral bone model and placed in a loading frame in 135° of flexion. Loosening of the femoral component was induced by moving the tibial component at a constant rate of displacement while maintaining the same angle of flexion. A stereophotogrammetric system registered the relative movement between the femoral component and the underlying bone until loosening occurred. Compared with high-flexion designs, conventional TKR designs required a significantly higher force before loosening occurred (p < 0.001). High-flexion designs with closed box geometry required significantly higher loosening forces than high-flexion designs with open box geometry (p = 0.0478). The presence of pegs further contributed to the fixation strength of components. We conclude that high-flexion designs have a greater risk for femoral component loosening than conventional TKR designs. We believe this is attributable to the absence of femoral load sharing between the prosthetic component and the condylar bone during flexion

Recently, high-flexion knee implants have been developed to provide for a large range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Since knee forces increase with larger flexion angles, it is commonly assumed that high-flex-ion implants are subjected to large loads in the highflexion range (flexion > 120°). However, high-flexion studies often do not consider thigh-calf contact which occurs during high-flexion activities such as squatting and kneeling. We hypothesized that thigh-calf contact is substantial and has a reducing effect on the prosthetic knee loading during deep knee flexion. The effect of thigh-calf contact on the loading of a knee implant was evaluated using a three-dimensional dynamic finite element knee model. The knee model consisted of a distal femur, a proximal tibia and fibula, a patella, high-flexion components of the PFC Sigma RP-F (Depuy, Warsaw, USA) and a quadriceps and patella tendon. Using this knee model, a squatting movement was simulated including thigh-calf contact characteristics of a typical subject which have been described in an earlier study. Thigh-calf contact considerably reduced the implant loading during deep knee flexion. At maximal flexion (155°), the compressive knee force decreased from 4.9 to 2.9 times bodyweight. The maximal joint forces shifted from occurring at maximal flexion angle to the flexion angle at which thigh-calf contact initiated (±130°). The maximal polyethylene contact stress at the tibial post decreased from 49.3 to 28.1 MPa at maximal flexion. This study confirms that thigh-calf contact reduces the knee loading during high-flexion. Both the joint forces and the polyethylene stresses reduced considerably when thigh-calf contact was included

The long-term outcome and survivorship of TKA in Asian countries have been reported to be excellent, comparable to Western countries. However, increased knee flexion is required for many daily activities in Asian cultures, which remains a major problem to be resolved. High-flexion TKA designs have been introduced to improve flexion after TKA and to allow a high degree of flexion in a safe manner. However, several biomechanical studies have shown that high-flexion designs have a greater risk for the loosening of the femoral component compared to the conventional TKA designs. We evaluated the implant survival and the mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes of Asian patients who had undergone high-flexion TKA and assessed whether high-flexion activities increased the risk of premature failure. We prospectively followed 72 Nexgen LPS-flex fixed TKA in 47 patients implanted by a single surgeon between March 2003 and September 2004. Five patients (6 knees) expired during follow-up. A Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis using revision surgery as the end point was used to determine the probability of survival for the cohort and the equality of survival between two subgroups who could perform high-flexion activities or not. Median follow-up was 6.5 (0.9–8.6) years. Twenty-five patients (33 knees) received a revision for aseptic loosening of the femoral component at a mean of 3.5 years (range, 0.9–7.8 years). According to the Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis, the probabilities of survival without revision for aseptic loosening are 66.7% and 51.8% at 5 and 8 years, respectively. The 8-year cumulative survivorship is lower (30.6%) when squatting, kneeling, or sitting cross-legged could be achieved than if none of these activities were possible (78.3%). In the surviving knees, non-progressive radiolucent lines were observed around the femoral component of 12 patients (15 knees) and one tibial component. The overall mid-term high-flex implant survival of our Asian cohort is lower than that of the conventional and other high-flexion designs. This unacceptable high rate of femoral component loosening is strongly associated with postoperative high flexion activities

Introduction. High-flexion knee implants have been developed to accommodate a large range of motion (ROM > 120°) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In a recent follow-up study, Han et al. [1] reported a disturbingly high incidence of femoral loosening for high-flexion TKA. The femoral component loosened particularly at the implant-cement interface. Highly flexed knee implants may be more sensitive to femoral loosening as the knee load is high during deep knee flexion [2], which may result in increased tensile and/or shear stresses at the femoral implant fixation. The objective of this study was to analyse the load-transfer mechanism at the femoral implant-cement interface during deep knee flexion (ROM = 155°). For this purpose, a three-dimensional finite element (FE) knee model was developed including high-flexion TKA components. Zero-thickness cohesive elements were used to model the femoral implant-cement interface. The research questions addressed in this study were whether high-flexion leads to an increased tensile and/or shear stress at the femoral implant-cement interface and whether this would lead to an increased risk of femoral loosening. Materials & methods. The FE knee model utilized in this study has been described previously [3] and consisted of a proximal tibia and fibula, TKA components, a quadriceps and patella tendon and a non-resurfaced patella. For use in this study, the distal femur was integrated in the FE model including cohesive interface elements and a 1 mm bone cement layer. High-flexion TKA components of the posterior-stabilised PFC Sigma RP-F (DePuy, J&J, USA) were incorporated in the FE knee model following the surgical procedure provided by the manufacturer. A full weight-bearing squatting cycle was simulated (ROM = 50°-155°). The interface stresses calculated by the FE knee model were decomposed into tension, compression and shear components. The strength of the femoral implant-cement interface was determined experimentally using interface specimens to predict whether a local interface stress-state calculated by the FE knee model would lead to interface debonding. Results. During deep knee flexion, tensile stress concentrations were found at the femoral implant-cement interface particularly beneath the anterior flange. Shear stress concentrations were observed at the interface beneath the anterior flange and the posterior femoral condyles. The peak tensile interface stress increased from 1.6 MPa at 120° of flexion to 5.5 MPa during deep knee flexion at the interface beneath the anterior flange. The peak shear stress was even higher at this interface location and increased from 4.1 MPa at 120° of flexion to 11.0 MPa at maximal flexion (155°). Based on the interface strength experiments, 5.8% of the interface beneath the anterior flange was predicted to debond at 120° of flexion, which increased to 10.8% during deep knee flexion. Discussion. Obviously, the FE knee model utilized in this study contains limitations which may have affected the interface stresses calculated. However, the results presented here clearly demonstrate increasing tensile and shear stresses in substantial parts of the femoral implant-cement beneath the anterior flange during deep knee flexion. Based on the interface strength experiments the anterior interfacial stress-state calculated by the FE knee model leads to local interface debonding during deep knee flexion, which increases the risk of femoral loosening. Proper anterior fixation of the femoral component is essential to reduce the risk of femoral loosening for high-flexion TKA

Aims. In Asia and the Middle-East, people often flex their knees deeply in order to perform activities of daily living. The purpose of this study was to investigate the 3D kinematics of normal knees during high-flexion activities. Our hypothesis was that the femorotibial rotation, varus-valgus angle, translations, and kinematic pathway of normal knees during high-flexion activities, varied according to activity. Materials and Methods. We investigated the in vivo kinematics of eight normal knees in four male volunteers (mean age 41.8 years; 37 to 53) using 2D and 3D registration technique, and modelled the knees with a computer aided design program. Each subject squatted, kneeled, and sat cross-legged. We evaluated the femoral rotation and varus-valgus angle relative to the tibia and anteroposterior translation of the medial and lateral side, using the transepicodylar axis as our femoral reference relative to the perpendicular projection on to the tibial plateau. This method evaluates the femur medially from what has elsewhere been described as the extension facet centre, and differs from the method classically applied. . Results. During squatting and kneeling, the knees displayed femoral external rotation. When sitting cross-legged, femurs displayed internal rotation from 10° to 100°. From 100°, femoral external rotation was observed. No significant difference in varus-valgus angle was seen between squatting and kneeling, whereas a varus position was observed from 140° when sitting cross-legged. The measure kinematic pathway using our methodology found during squatting a medial pivoting pattern from 0° to 40° and bicondylar rollback from 40° to 150°. During kneeling, a medial pivot pattern was evident. When sitting cross-legged, a lateral pivot pattern was seen from 0° to 100°, and a medial pivot pattern beyond 100°. Conclusion. The kinematics of normal knees during high flexion are variable according to activity. Nevertheless, our study was limited to a small number of male patients using a different technique to report the kinematics than previous publications. Accordingly, caution should be observed in generalizing our findings. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:50–5

The range of motion (ROM) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most important factors for patient satisfaction, especially in Asian countries. To enhance the knee flexion angle, “high-flexion” designs have been introduced in total knee prostheses. One of such design was a new design of femoral prosthesis, which increased the posterior cut on the bone by 2 mm and thickened the posterior condyle, allowing the posterior condylar radius to continue further. There were several reports on postoperative ROM of such “high-flexion” posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee prosthesis. However, there was no report on the postoperative ROM of “high-flexion” cruciate ligament retaining (CR) total knee prosthesis. The purpose of this study was to compare the ROM associated with standard and high-flexion posterior CR total knee prostheses. One hundred and fifty-one consecutive patients (176 knees) had CR total knee prosthesis. 89 knees had standard CR TKA (NexGen CR, Zimmer, Warsaw, IL), and 87 knees had high-flexion CR knee prostheses (NexGen CR-Flex, Zimmer, Warsaw, IL). Differences in the age, diagnosis, preoperative Knee Society Score (KSS), and preoperative ROM of the knee between two groups were not significant. At one year postoperatively, the patients were assessed clinically and radiographically. The mean postoperative KSS knee score was 96.2 points for the standard CR prosthesis group and 96.7 points for the high-flexion CR prosthesis group (p=0.464). The mean postoperative KSS function score was 83.4 points for the standard CR prosthesis group and 84.8 points for the high-flexion CR prosthesis group (p=0.446). The mean postoperative ROM was 110.8 degrees in the standard CR prosthesis group, and 114.0 degrees in high-flexion prosthesis group (p=0.236). No knee had aseptic loosening, revision, or osteolysis. Previous report showed that “high-flexion” PS design did not increase postoperative ROM compared to standard design. However, there was no report on the postoperative ROM of “high-flexion” CR total knee prosthesis. We found no significant differences between the standard CR group and “high-flexion” CR group with regard to ROM or clinical and radiographic parameters. However, in the cases which achieved high flexion, “high-flexion” design, which chamfered posterior femoral edge, can reduce the possibility of deformation from posterior contacts under lord. Therefore, the results of the current study suggested that “high-flexion” CR design is not the design that increase ROM significantly, but might be the safe design even when the knee achieved deep flexion

Background: The main goals of total knee arthroplasty are pain relief and improvement of function and range of motion. To ascertain whether posterior cruciate-retaining-flex total knee prosthesis would improve pain, function and range of motion, we asked whether knee and pain scores, ranges of motion, WOMAC score, patient satisfaction, and radiographic results would be better in the knees with a high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining prosthesis than in the knees with a standard posterior cruciate-retaining prosthesis. Methods: Fifty-four patients (mean age, 69.7 years) received a standard posterior cruciate-retaining knee prosthesis in one knee and a high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining knee prosthesis in the contralateral knee. Five patients were men, and forty-nine were women. The minimum follow-up was three years (mean 3.1 years). At each follow-up, the WOMAC score and range of knee motion were evaluated and patients were assessed clinically and radiographically with use of the knee-rating systems of the Knee Society and The Hospital for Special Surgery. Results: The mean postoperative Knee Society and Hospital for Special Surgery knee scores were 93.7 and 89 points, respectively in the knees with a standard posterior cruciate-retaining prosthesis and those were 93.9 and 90 points, respectively in the knees with a high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining prosthesis. The mean postoperative WOMAC score was 22 points. Postoperatively, the mean non-weight and weight bearing ranges of motion were 131° (range, 90° to 150°) and 115° (range, 75 to 145°), respectively in the knees with a standard prosthesis and those were 133° (range, 90° to 150°) and 118° (range, 75 to 145°), respectively in the knees with a highflexion prosthesis. Patients satisfaction and radiographic results were similar in both groups. No knee had aseptic loosening, revision, or osteolysis. Conclusions: After a minimum follow-up of three years, we found no significant differences between the two groups with regard to range of knee motion or clinical and radiographic results

We undertook a study in which 138 female patients with a mean age of 71.2 years (51 to 82) received a standard NexGen CR-flex prosthesis in one knee and a gender-specific NexGen CR-flex prosthesis in the other. The mean follow-up period was 3.25 years (3.1 to 3.5). The aspect ratios of the standard and gender-specific prostheses were compared with that of the distal femur.

The mean post-operative Knee Society knee scores were 94 (70 to 100) and 93 (70 to 100) points and the function scores were 83 (60 to 100) and 84 (60 to 100) points for the standard implants and the gender-specific designs, respectively. The mean post-operative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities score was 26.4 points (0 to 76). Patient satisfaction, the radiological results and the complication rates were similar in the two groups. In those with a standard prosthesis, the femoral component was closely matched in 80 knees (58.0%), overhung in 14 (10.1%) and undercovered the bone in 44 (31.9%). In those with a gender-specific prosthesis, it was closely matched in 15 knees (10.9%) and undercovered the bone in 123 (89.1%).

Since we found no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the clinical and radiological results, patient satisfaction or complication rate, the goal of the design of the gender-specific CR-flex prosthesis to improve the outcome was not achieved in our patients.

Increasingly, high flexion components have been touted by the industrial manufacturers of them as the implants of choice for routine total knee replacement (TKR). An acceptable flexion arc is obtainable in most patients through various intra-operative techniques; however, the importance of obtaining high flexion—which we define as greater than 120 degrees—is unclear.

In our pilot study, a review was undertaken involving 60 of the senior authors patients who attained greater than 120 degrees of flexion after receiving an implant said to be high flexion based on the presence of both a rotating platform as well as a conforming cam-and-post third condylar space.

Despite the achievement of both high flexion and impressive patient satisfaction, no functional benefits were observed—an observation that is supported in the current literature. We will explore possible reasons for this discord and note that most patients did not express the desire to regularly perform high flexion activities such as kneeling, squatting and stooping on a daily basis. Our results and evaluation of the literature lead us to question the importance placed upon the achievement of the maximum possible post-operative flexion arc as well as the importance placed in the ability to perform high flexion activities.

This, in turn, calls into question the validity of many of the currently accepted outcomes measures used to post-operatively evaluate total knee replacements.

Purpose

The NexGen® legacy posterior stabilized (LPS)-Flex total knee system (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) is designed to provide 150° of flexion following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). But, recent reports found a high incidence of loosening of the femoral component related to the deep flexion provided. We evaluated 9- to 12-year clinical and radiological follow-up results after NexGen® LPS-Flex TKA.

Aims. The aims of this study were to investigate the ability to kneel after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing, and its effect on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Secondary aims included identifying which kneeling positions were most important to patients, and the influence of radiological parameters on the ability to kneel before and after TKA. Methods. This prospective longitudinal study involved 209 patients who underwent single radius cruciate-retaining TKA without patellar resurfacing. Preoperative EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and the ability to achieve four kneeling positions were assessed including a single leg kneel, a double leg kneel, a high-flexion kneel, and a praying position. The severity of radiological osteoarthritis (OA) was graded and the pattern of OA was recorded intraoperatively. The flexion of the femoral component, posterior condylar offset, and anterior femoral offset were measured radiologically. At two to four years postoperatively, 151 patients with a mean age of 70.0 years (SD 9.44) were included. Their mean BMI was 30.4 kg/m. 2. (SD 5.36) and 60 were male (40%). They completed EQ-5D, OKS, and Kujala scores, assessments of the ability to kneel, and a visual analogue scale for anterior knee pain and satisfaction. Results. The ability to kneel in the four positions improved in between 29 (19%) and 53 patients (35%) after TKA, but declined in between 35 (23%) and 46 patients (30%). Single-leg kneeling was most important to patients. After TKA, 62 patients (41%) were unable to achieve a single-leg kneel, 76 (50%) were unable to achieve a double-leg kneel, 102 (68%) were unable to achieve a high-flexion kneel and 61 (40%) were unable to achieve a praying position. Posterolateral cartilage loss significantly affected preoperative deep flexion kneeling (p = 0.019). A postoperative inability to kneel was significantly associated with worse OKS, Kujala scores, and satisfaction (p < 0.05). Multivariable regression analysis identified significant independent associations with the ability to kneel after TKA (p < 0.05): better preoperative EQ-5D and flexion of the femoral component for single-leg kneeling; the ability to achieve it preoperatively and flexion of the femoral component for double-leg kneeling; male sex for high-flexion kneeling; and the ability to achieve it preoperatively, anterior femoral offset, and patellar cartilage loss for the praying position. Conclusion. The ability to kneel was important to patients and significantly influenced knee-specific PROMs, but was poorly restored by TKA with equal chances of improvement or decline. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(9):1514–1525

Objective. To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes obtained by combination of high-flexion Freedom® Total Knee System (TKS) and mini-subvastus approach in total knee replacement patients. Method. This is a retrospective, observational, real world study conducted at Mumbai in India from 2011 to 2016. All patients who were above the age of 18 and operated for total knee replacement (TKR) with mini-subvastus approach using Freedom (Maxx Medical) by the senior author were included. The Implant survivorship was the survey endpoint; primary endpoint was range of motion (ROM); and secondary endpoints were AKSS (American Knee Society Score) and WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis) scores collected pre- and post-operatively. Results. 184 patients with 242 knees (126 unilateral and 58 bilateral) were operated with high-flexion TKS. Average age of patients was 70 ± 6.2 years. The mean ROM increased from 99.4°±10.44° (50°-120°) preoperatively to 116.78°±8.18° (88°–140°) postoperatively (p<0.001). Clinical and functional AKSS scores improved from 60.83±5.12 to 91.16±2.19 (p<0.001) and 65.35±3.52 to 99.13±4.61 (p<0.001) respectively. There average WOMAC pain scores improved from 12.12±1.72 to 0.066±0.37 (<0.0001). Moreover, post-operative WOMAC stiffness and function scores depicted significant improvement from 4.43±0.97 to 0.03±0.26 (p<0.0001) and 0.03±0.26 to 0.18±1.21 (p<0.0001) respectively at a mean follow-up of 3.71 ± 0.98 years. Implant survivorship was 100%. Conclusion. High-flexion Freedom® TKS demonstrated a satisfactory clinical and functional improvements including high flexion when operated by the mini-subvastus approach at a mean FU of 4 years

High-flexion knee replacements have been developed to accommodate a large range of motion (ROM > 120°) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Femoral rollback or posterior translation of the femoral condyles during knee flexion is essential to maximise ROM and to avoid bone-implant impingement during deep knee flexion. The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) has been described as the main contributor to femoral rollback. In posterior-stabilised TKA designs the PCL is substituted by a post-cam mechanism. The main objective of this study was to analyse the mechanical interaction between the PCL and a highflexion cruciate-retaining knee replacement during deep knee flexion. For this purpose, the mechanical performance of the high-flexion cruciate-retaining TKA design was evaluated and compared with two control designs including a highflexion posterior-stabilised design. Materials & Methods: Prosthetic knee kinematics and kinetics were computed using a three-dimensional dynamic finite element (FE) model of the knee joint. The FE knee model consisted of a distal femur, a proximal tibia and fibula, a quadriceps and patella tendon, a non-resurfaced patella, TKA components and a posterior cruciate ligament in case cruciate-retaining designs were evaluated. Tibio-femoral and patello-femoral contact were defined in the FE knee model and the polyethylene insert was modelled as a non-linear elastic-plastic material. Three different rotating platform TKA systems were analysed in this study: the high-flexion cruciate-retaining PFC Sigma CR150, the high-flexion posterior-stabilised PFC Sigma RP-F and the conventional cruciate-retaining PFC Sigma RP (Depuy, J& J, UK). Both the polyethylene stress characteristics and the tibio-femoral contact locations were evaluated during a squatting movement (ROM = 50° – 150°). Results: During deep knee flexion (ROM > 120°), the high-flexion cruciate-retaining TKA design showed a lower peak contact stress (74.7 MPa) than the conventional cruciate-retaining design (96.5 MPa). The posterior-stabilized high-flexion TKA design demonstrated the lowest peak contact stress at the condylar contact interface (54.2 MPa), although the post was loaded higher (77.4 MPa). All three TKA designs produced femoral rollback in the normal flexion range (ROM ≤ 120°), whereas the cruciate-retaining designs showed a paradoxical anterior movement of the femoral condyles during high-flexion. Discussion: PCL retention is a challenging surgical aim and affects the prosthetic knee load and kinematics as shown in this study. In addition, for adequate functioning the PCL should not be too tight or too lax after surgery. Hence, we investigated the effect of PCL laxity on the prosthetic performance and the best-balanced PCL was used in our simulations. Although PCL balancing is not an issue for posterior-stabilized TKA, we found the tibial post to be loaded relatively high for this implant type

Aims. The removal of the cruciate ligaments in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been suggested as a potential contributing factor to patient dissatisfaction, due to alteration of the in vivo biomechanics of the knee. Bicruciate retaining (BCR) TKA allows the preservation of the cruciate ligaments, thus offering the potential to reproduce healthy kinematics. The aim of this study was to compare in vivo kinematics between the operated and contralateral knee in patients who have undergone TKA with a contemporary BCR design. Methods. A total of 29 patients who underwent unilateral BCR TKA were evaluated during single-leg deep lunges and sit-to-stand tests using a validated computer tomography and fluoroscopic imaging system. In vivo six-degrees of freedom (6DOF) kinematics were compared between the BCR TKA and the contralateral knee. Results. During single-leg deep lunge, BCR TKAs showed significantly less mean posterior femoral translation (13 mm; standard deviation (SD) 4) during terminal flexion, compared with the contralateral knee (16.6 mm, SD 3.7; p = 0.001). Similarly, BCR TKAs showed significantly less mean femoral rollback (11.6 mm (SD 4.5) vs 14.4 mm (SD 4.6); p < 0.043) during sit-to-stand. BCR TKAs showed significantly reduced internal rotation during many parts of the strenuous flexion activities particularly during high-flexion lunge (4° (SD 5.6°) vs 6.5° (SD 6.1°); p = 0.051) and during sit-to-stand (4.5° (SD 6°) vs 6.9° (SD 6.3°); p = 0.048). Conclusion. The contemporary design of BCR TKA showed asymmetrical flexion-extension and internal-external rotation, suggesting that the kinematics are not entirely reproduced during strenuous activities. Future studies are required to establish the importance of patient factors, component orientation and design, in optimizing kinematics in patients who undergo BCR TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6 Supple A):59–65

Introduction: Recently, high-flexion knee implants have been developed to provide for a large range of motion (ROM > 120°) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). High-flexion knee implants are more likely subjected to large knee loads than conventional implants since knee joint forces increase with larger flexion angles. Highly conforming knee replacements are designed to minimise polyethylene peak stresses during (deep) knee flexion. The Birmingham Knee Replacement (BKR, Jointmedica, UK) is a newly designed knee replacement which combines a high conformity during the complete ROM with the principles of rotating platform and high-flexion TKA. The main objective of this study was to analyze the mechanical performance of the BKR during its full ROM (0°–155°) and investigate whether its high conformity could be maintained during high-flexion. In addition, the BKR polyethylene loading computed in this study was compared with other mobile bearings. Materials & methods: TKA performance was analyzed using a three-dimensional dynamic finite element (FE) model of the knee joint. The FE knee model consisted of a distal femur, a proximal tibia and fibula, a quadriceps and patella tendon, a non-resurfaced patella and TKA components. Tibio-femoral and patello-femoral contact were defined in the knee model. Three different posterior stabilised rotating platform TKAs were subsequently incorporated: the high-flexion BKR, the high-flexion PFC Sigma RP-F and the standard PFC Sigma RP (Depuy, J& J, USA). The polyethylene insert was modelled as a non-linear elastic-plastic material in each TKA system. Polyethylene loading parameters as well as the tibio-femoral contact point locations were computed during an entire flexion movement (0°–155°). Results: In the normal flexion range (flexion ≤ 120°) the three knee implants behaved very similar except for the polyethylene loading at the post. At 120° of flexion, the contact stress at the dish was ±45 MPa for all implants whereas the maximal post-cam contact stress came down to 26.7 MPa for the BKR which was half the amount of contact stress experienced by both PFC Sigma implants. During high-flexion (flexion > 120°), the contact stress difference at the post between the BKR and the PFC Sigma RP-F became smaller and came down to 37.9 MPa and 60.7 MPa, respectively. The total amount of plastic deformation at maximal flexion (155°) was smaller for the BKR (577 mm3) in comparison with the Sigma RP-F (2256 mm3). Femoral rollback was negligible for the BKR in the high-flexion range in comparison with the Sigma RP-F (1.9 mm). Discussion: A comparison between different geometrical models using finite element techniques is jeopardised by differences in element distribution within the various models. These differences may affect calculated parameters such as peak stress values. However, in this study the models were very similar which would indicate that the differences in stress patterns found are due to design differences rather than model artefacts. The current study therefore indicates that the BKR benefits from its high conformity during the full ROM. Hence, the BKR demonstrated relatively low polyethylene stresses. The quadriceps efficiency during deep knee flexion may be lower in case of the BKR since the femoral rollback was negligible at these flexion angles. Whether this phenomenon is of any clinical relevance is unknown

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a gender-specific high-flexion posterior-stabilised (PS) total knee replacement (TKR) would offer advantages over a high-flex PS TKR regarding range of movement (ROM), ‘feel’ of the knee, pain and satisfaction, as well as during activity. A total of 24 female patients with bilateral osteoarthritis entered this prospective, blind randomised trial in which they received a high-flex PS TKR in one knee and a gender-specific high-flexion PS TKR in the other knee. At follow-up, patients were assessed clinically measuring ROM, and questioned about pain, satisfaction and daily ‘feel’ of each knee. Patients underwent gait analysis pre-operatively and at one year, which yielded kinematic, kinetic and temporospatial parameters indicative of knee function during gait. At final follow-up we found no statistically significant differences in ROM (p = 0.82). The median pain score was 0 (0 to 8) in both groups (p = 0.95). The median satisfaction score was 9 (4 to 10) in the high-flex group and 8 (0 to 10) in the gender-specific group (p = 0.98). The median ‘feel’ score was 9 (3 to 10) in the high-flex group and 8 (0 to 10) in the gender-specific group (p = 0.66). Gait analysis showed no statistically significant differences between the two prosthetic designs in any kinematic, kinetic or temporospatial parameters. Both designs produced good clinical results with significant improvements in several gait parameters without evidence of any advantage in the gender-specific design

In a previous study, we found that pre-TKA patients were severely disabled in high-flexion activities but perceived these disabilities as being no more important than pain relief and the restoration of daily routine activities. This study was conducted to investigate functional disabilities and patient satisfaction in Korean patients after TKA. Of 387 patients who had undergone TKA with a follow-up longer than 12 months, 270 (69.7%) completed a questionnaire designed to evaluate functional disabilities, perceived importance and patient satisfaction. The top 5 severe functional disabilities were difficulties in kneeling, squatting, sitting with legs crossed, sexual activity, and recreational activities. The top 5 in order of perceived importance were difficulties in walking, using a bathtub, working, climbing stairs, and recreation activities. Severities of functional disabilities were not found to be correlated with perceived importance. The patients (8.5%) dissatisfied with their replaced knees had more severe functional disabilities than the satisfied for most activities. The dissatisfied patients tended to perceive functional disabilities in high-flexion activities to be more important than the satisfied. This study indicates that despite severe disabilities in high-flexion activities, most Korean patients after TKA would not consider high-flexion disability to be more important than other daily routine activities. Moreover, postoperative high-flexion disabilities would not adversely influence satisfaction for most patients. Nevertheless, such disabilities are likely to cause dissatisfaction among those that are not prepared to modify their traditional life-styles

Introduction. Special high-flexion prosthetic designs show a small increase in postoperative flexion compared to standard designs and some papers show increased anterior knee pain with these prosthesis. However, no randomised controlled trails have been published which investigate difference in postoperative complaints of anterior knee pain. To assess difference in passive and active postoperative flexion and anterior knee pain we performed a randomized clinical trial including the two extremes of knee arthroplasty designs, being a high flex posterior stabilized rotating platform prosthesis versus a traditional cruciate retaining fixed bearing prosthesis. We hypothesised that the HF-PS design would allow more flexion, due to increased femoral rollback with less anterior knee pain than the CR design. We specifically assessed the following hypotheses:. Patients have increased flexion after HF-PS TKA compared to CR TKA, both passive and active. Patients show an increased femoral rollback in the HF-PS TKA as compared to the CR TKA. Patients receiving a HF-PS TKA design report reduced anterior knee pain relative to those receiving the CR TKA. Methods. In total 47 patients were randomly allocated to a standard cruciate retaining fixed bearing design (CR) in 23 patients and to a high-flexion posterior stabilized mobile bearing design (HF-PS) in 24 patients. Preoperative and one year postoperative we investigated active and passive maximal flexion. Furthermore, we used the VAS pain score at rest and during exercise and the Feller score to investigate anterior knee pain. A lateral roentgen photograph was used to measure femoral rollback during maximal flexion. Results. The HF-PS did show a significantly higher passive postoperative flexion; 120.8° (SD 10.3°) vs. 112.0° (SD 9.5°) for the CR group (p=0.004). The active postoperative flexion, VAS-pain score and Feller score did not show significant differences between both groups. Sub analysis with the HF-PS group showed a higher VAS-pain for the patients achieving ≥130° of flexion; 30.5 (SD 32.2) vs. 12.2 (SD 12.5) (p=0.16). The rollback was significantly lower in the CR group compared to the HF-PS group; 4.4 (SD 3.0) vs. 8.4 (SD 2.1). Conclusion. The present study showed a significant higher passive flexion in the Posterior Stabilised-High Flexion mobile bearing compared to a Cruciate Retaining fixed bearing prosthesis. However, this difference disappeared when comparing active flexion. The difference in passive flexion was probably related to a significantly lower rollback causing impingement in the CR prosthesis. No difference in anterior knee pain was found between both groups. However, a suggestion is raised that achieving high-flexion might lead to more patellofemoral complaints/anterior knee pain

Introduction. Inability to reproduce 6-degrees of freedom (6DOF) kinematics, abnormal “paradoxical” anterior femoral translation and loss of normal medial pivot rotation are challenges associated with contemporary posterior cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The removal of the anterior and/or both cruciate ligaments in CR/PS TKA, leading to significant kinematic alteration of the knee joint, has been suggested as one of the potential contributory factors in patients remaining dissatisfied after TKA. Bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) TKA designs allow preservation of both anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments with the potential to replicate normal knee joint kinematics. Physically demanding tasks such as sit-to-stand (STS), and deep lunging may be more sensitive tools for investigating preserved kinematic abnormalities following TKA. This study aims to compare in-vivo kinematics between the operated and the contralateral non-operated knee in patients with contemporary BCR TKA design. Methods. Twenty-nine patients (14 male; 15 female, 65.7±7.7 years) unilaterally implanted with a contemporary BCR TKA design featuring an asymmetric femoral component and independently designed medial and lateral bearings were evaluated. Mean follow-up time after BCR TKA was 12.7±5.1 months. All patients received a computer tomography (CT) scan from the pelvis to the ankles for the creation of 3D surface models of both knees (BCR TKA and non-operated). Patients performed single leg deep lunges and sit-to-stand under a validated dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) surveillance. Each patient's 2D dynamic fluoroscopic images, corresponding 3D surface bone models (for contralateral non-operated knee) and computer aided design (CAD) implant models (for the BCR TKA implanted knee) were imported into a virtual DFIS environment in MATLAB. An optimization procedure was utilized to perform matching between the 3D surface bone models and the 2D fluoroscopic image outlines. In-vivo 6DOF kinematics of the BCR TKA knees and contralateral non-operated side were quantified and analyzed. Results. When performing the high-flexion lunge, BCR TKA knees demonstrated less average femoral posterior translation (13±4mm) during terminal flexion when compared to the contralateral non-operated knees (16.6±3.7mm) (p=0.001). Similarly, during STS, less femoral rollback was observed (11.6±4.5mm vs 14.4±4.6mm, p<0.04) in BCR TKA knees. Overall, BCR TKA knees partially reproduced a normal “screw-home” motion, demonstrating reduced internal rotation during several intervals of the cycles for strenuous flexion activities. BCR TKA knees demonstrated less internal rotation during high-flexion lunge (4±5.6° vs 6.5±6.1°, p=0.05). Similarly, during STS, less internal rotation was observed (4.5±6° vs 6.9±6.3°, p=0.04, p=0.02, p=0.01, p=0.02) in BCR TKA knees. Conclusion. The BCR TKA design demonstrated asymmetries in flexion-extension and internal-external rotation, suggesting that in-vivo tibiofemoral kinematic parameters are not fully restored in BCR patients during functionally strenuous activities such as single leg deep lunges and sit-to-stand. Further studies are required to elucidate the importance of patient factors, surgical component orientation and implant designs in optimizing in vivo kinematics in patients with BCR TKA. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

This prospective randomised controlled double-blind trial compared two types of PFC Sigma total knee replacement (TKR), differing in three design features aimed at improving flexion. The outcome of a standard fixed-bearing posterior cruciate ligament-preserving design (FB-S) was compared with that of a high-flexion rotating-platform posterior-stabilised design (RP-F) at one year after TKR. The study group of 77 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee comprised 37 men and 40 women, with a mean age of 69 years (44.9 to 84.9). The patients were randomly allocated either to the FB-S or the RP-F group and assessed pre-operatively and at one year post-operatively. The mean post-operative non-weight-bearing flexion was 107° (95% confidence interval (CI) 104° to 110°)) for the FB-S group and 113° (95% CI 109° to 117°) for the RP-F group, and this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.032). However, weight-bearing range of movement during both level walking and ascending a slope as measured during flexible electrogoniometry was a mean of 4° lower in the RP-F group than in the FB-S group, with 58° (95% CI 56° to 60°) versus 54° (95% CI 51° to 57°) for level walking (p = 0.019) and 56° (95% CI 54° to 58°) versus 52° (95% CI 48° to 56°) for ascending a slope (p = 0.044). Further, the mean post-operative pain score of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index was significantly higher in the RP-F group (2.5 (95% CI 1.5 to 3.5) versus 4.2 (95% CI 2.9 to 5.5), p = 0.043). Although the RP-F group achieved higher non-weight-bearing knee flexion, patients in this group did not use this during activities of daily living and reported more pain one year after surgery