Introduction. In total hip arthroplasty, a high radiographic inclination angle (RI) of the acetabular component has been linked to short- and long-term complications. There are several factors that lead to RI outliers including cup version, pelvic orientation and angle of the cup introducer relative to the floor. The primary aim of this study was to analyse what increases the risk of having a cup with an RI outside the target zone when controlling cup orientation with a digital inclinometer. Methods. In this prospective study, we included 200 consecutive patients undergoing uncemented primary THA in the lateral decubitus position using a posterior approach. Preoperatively, the surgeon determined the target intraoperative inclination (IOI. target. ). The intra-operative inclination of the cup (IOI. cup. ) was measured with the aid of a digital inclinometer after seating of the acetabular component. Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were made to measure the RI of the acetabular component. The target zones were defined as 30°-45° and 35°-45° of RI. The operative inclination relative to the sagittal plane of the pelvis (OI. math. ) was calculated based on the radiographic inclination and anteversion angle. The difference between two outcome measures was expressed as Δ. Results. The mean RI was 37.9° SD 4.7, there were 12 cases with RI outside the 30°– 45° zone (6%) and 53 outliers (26.5%) with RI outside the 35°-45° zone. The mean absolute ΔIOI. cup. -IOI. target. was 1.2° SD 1.0. The absolute ΔIOI. cup. -IOI. target. was less than 1° in 108 patients (54%), less than 2° in 160 patients (80%), less than 3° in 186 patients (93%), and in 14 patients (7%) the difference was 3°-5°. The mean pelvic motion (ΔOI. math. -IOI. cup. ) was 8.8° SD 3.9 (95% CI 8.2° to 9.3°). The absolute deviation from the mean ΔOI. math. -IOI. cup. , which corresponds with the amount of pelvic motion, was significantly higher in RI outliers compared with non-outliers for both the 30°-45° and 35°-45° inclination zone (7.4° SD 3.3 vs 2.8° SD 2.1 and 4.7° SD 2.8 vs 2.5° SD 2.0 respectively) (p<0.0001). A linear regression analysis demonstrated a strong correlation between ΔOI. math. -IOI. cup. and the RI of the cup (r. 2. =0.70; P<0.0001). A multiple regression was run to predict ΔOI. math. -IOI. cup. from gender, BMI, side and hip circumference. These variables statistically significantly predicted ΔOI. math. -OIa. cup. , F(4, 195) = 19,435, p<0.0001, R2 = 0.285, but only side (p=0.04) and hip circumference (p<0.0001) added statistically significantly to the prediction. Discussion and Conclusion. When using a digital inclinometer 94% of cups had a RI within a 30°-45° zone and 73.5% of cups within a 35°-45° zone using a predefined IOI. target. based on the patient's hip circumference. The difference between the IOI. target. and the IOI. cup. of the acetabular component was less than 3° in 93% and less than 5° in all patients signifying that the surgeons were able to implant the cup close to their chosen intra-operative orientation. Deviation from the mean ΔOI. math. -IOI. cup. was significantly bigger in the RI outliers indicating that RI outliers were caused by more or less than deviation of the sagittal plane of the pelvis at time of cup impaction

Aims. Existing literature indicates that inferiorly inclined glenoid baseplates following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) produce better outcomes compared to superiorly inclined baseplates. We aim to compare clinical outcomes for RSAs with superiorly and neutrally/inferiorly inclined lateralized glenospheres. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 154 consecutive patients undergoing RSA between July 2015 and July 2017 by one single-fellowship trained surgeon (AJ). Two raters (KAM and MVS) independently measured glenoid inclination in preoperative and minimum two year follow-up radiographs (anteroposterior/Grashey) using the RSA angle. Inclination was then compared to patient-reported outcomes, range of motion (ROM), and independently assessed degree of scapular notching and staging of heterotopic ossification at two year follow-up. Results. Median postoperative inclination for each group was found to be -3.6° (interquartile range (IQR) -2.1 to -6.9) and 6.0° (3.2° to 10.1°) for the neutrally/inferiorly and superiorly inclined cohorts, respectively. Preoperative inclination was highly associated with postoperative inclination (p = 0.004). When comparing superiorly and neutrally/inferiorly inclined glenospheres, there were no differences in heterotopic ossification (p = 0.606), scapular notching (p = 0.367), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (p = 0.419), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (p = 0.417), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score (p = 0.290), forward elevation (p = 0.161), external rotation (p = 0.537), or internal rotation (p = 0.656). Conclusion. Compared to neutral and inferior inclination, up to 6° ± 3° of superior glenoid baseplate inclination on a lateralized RSA design produces no differences in postoperative ROM or patient-reported outcomes, and produces similar levels of scapular notching and heterotopic ossification. Additionally, the degree of preoperative inclination represents an important factor in surgical decision-making as it is strongly associated with postoperative inclination. It is important to note that the findings of this study are only reflective of lateralized RSA prostheses. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):360–365

Aims. The aims of this study were to identify means to quantify coronal plane displacement associated with distal radius fractures (DRFs), and to understand their relationship to radial inclination (RI). Methods. From posteroanterior digital radiographs of healed DRFs in 398 female patients aged 70 years or older, and 32 unfractured control wrists, the relationships of RI, quantifiably, to four linear measurements made perpendicular to reference distal radial shaft (DRS) and ulnar shaft (DUS) axes were analyzed: 1) DRS to radial aspect of ulnar head (DRS-U); 2) DUS to volar-ulnar corner of distal radius (DUS-R); 3) DRS to proximal capitate (DRS-PC); and 4) DRS to DUS (interaxis distance, IAD); and, qualitatively, to the distal ulnar fracture, and its intersection with the DUS axis. Results. In the study (fracture) and control groups, respectively, the mean values were: RI, 17.2° (SD 7.2°; -7° to 35°) and 25.6° (SD 2.6°; 21° to 30°); DRS-U, 13.5 mm (SD 1.7; 4.9 to 20.8) and 15.3 mm (SD 0.72; 13.8 to 16.3); DUS-R, 13.4 mm (SD 2.1; 4.8 to 18.5) and 12.0 mm (SD 0.99; 9.7 to 13.9); DRS-PC (positive value radial to DRS, negative value ulnar), 0.14 mm (SD 5.4; -10.9 to 22.7) and -6.1 mm (SD 1.6; -10.6 to -2.3); and IAD, 25.3 mm (SD 2.5; 17.6 to 31.1) and 27.1 mm (SD 1.5; 24.5 to 31.0). All means were significantly different between the study and control groups. RI correlated strongly with DRS-PC. Ulnar styloid fracture intersection with the DUS axis, reflective of ulnar translation of both radial and ulnar shafts, was associated with significantly lower RI. Conclusion. After DRF, the relationship of the proximal capitate to the DRS axis in the coronal plane correlates with the final radial inclination. Additionally, ulnar styloid intersection with the DUS axis is associated with even lower radial inclination. DRF reduction should seek to restore the normal coronal relationship of both radial and ulnar shafts to their distal counterparts. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(6):688–695

Introduction. Acetabular component orientation is an important determinant of outcome following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although surgeons aim to achieve optimal cup orientation, many studies demonstrate their inability to consistently achieve this. Factors that contribute are pelvic orientation and the surgeon's ability to correctly orient the cup at implantation. The goal of this study was to determine the accuracy with which surgeons can achieve cup orientation angles. Methods. In this in vitro study using a calibrated left and right sawbone hemipelvis model, participants (n=10) were asked to place a cup mounted on its introducer giving different targets. Measurements of cup orientation were made using a stereophotogrammetry protocol to measure radiographic inclination and operative anteversion (OA). A digital inclinometer was used to measure the intra-operative inclination (IOI) which is the angle of the cup introducer relative to the floor. First, the participant stated his or her preferred IOI and OA and positioned the cup accordingly. Second, the participant had to position the cup parallel to the anteversion of the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL). Third, the participant had to position the cup at IOI angles of 35°, 40° and 45°. Fourth, the participant used the mechanical alignment guide (45° of IOI and 30° of OA) to orient the cup. Each task was analysed separately and subgroup analysis included left versus right side and hip surgeons versus non-hip surgeons. Results. For the first task, hip surgeons preferred smaller IOI and larger OA than non-hip surgeons, but there was no significant difference in accuracy between both groups. When aiming for TAL, both surgeon groups performed similar, but accuracy on the non-dominant side was significantly better compared with the dominant side (mean deviation 0.6° SD 2.4 versus −2.6° SD 2.3) (p=0.004). When aiming for a specific IOI target of 35°, 40° or 45°, non-hip surgeons outperformed hip surgeons (mean deviation form target IOI 1.9° SD 2.7 versus −3.1° SD 3.8) (p<0.0001) with less variance (p=0.03). Contrary to version, accuracy on the dominant side was significantly better compared with the non-dominant side (mean deviation −0.4° SD 3.4 versus −2.1° SD 4.8). When using a mechanical guide, surgeons performed similar (0.6° SD 1.2 versus −0.4° SD 2.1 for inclination p=0.11 and −0.5° SD 2.6 versus −1.8° SD 3.3 for version p=0.22) and these values did not differ significantly from the actual IOI and OA of the mechanical guide. When using a mechanical guide, there was no difference in accuracy between the dominant and non-dominant side. Conclusion. There was no difference in accuracy between hip surgeons and non-hip surgeons when they aimed for their preferred IOI and OA or used a mechanical guide. When aiming for a specific IOI target, non-hip surgeons outperformed hip surgeons. Hip surgeons overestimate IOI and underestimate OA, presumably because this helps to achieve the desired radiographic cup orientation. Regarding accuracy, the non-dominant side was better for version and the dominant side for inclination. When aiming for a specific IOI and OA target, using a mechanical guide is significantly better than freehand cup orientation

The angle of acetabular inclination is an important measurement in total hip replacement (THR) procedures. Determining the acetabular component orientation intra-operatively remains a challenge. An increasing number of innovators have described techniques and devices to achieve it. This paper describes a mechanical inclinometer design to measure intra-operative acetabular cup inclination. Then, the mechanical device is tested to determine its accuracy. The aim was to design an inclinometer to measure inclination without existing instrumentation modification. The device was designed to meet the following criteria: 1. measure inclination with acceptable accuracy (+/− 5o); 2. easy to use intra-operatively (handling & visualization); 3. adaptable and useable with majority of instrumentation kits without modification; 4. sterilizable by all methods; 5. robust/reusable. The prototype device was drafted by computer aided design (CAD) software. Then a prototype was constructed using a 3D printer to establish the final format. The final device was CNC machined from SAE 304 stainless steel. The design uses an eccentrically weighted flywheel mounted on two W16002-2RS ball bearings pressed into symmetrical housing components. The weighted wheel is engraved with calibrated markings relative to its mass centre. Device functioning is dependent on gravity maintaining the weighted wheel in a fixed orientation while the housing can adapt to the calibration allowing for determining the corresponding measurement. The prototype device accuracy was compared to a digital device. A digital protractor was used to create an angle. The mechanical inclinometer (user blinded to digital reading) was used to determine the angle and compared to the digital reading. The accuracy of the device compared to the standard freehand technique was assessed using a saw bone pelvis fixed in a lateral decubitus position. 18 surgeons (6 expert, 6 intermediate, 6 novice) were asked to place an uncemented acetabular cup in a saw bone pelvis to a target of 40 degrees. First freehand then using the inclinometer. The inclination was determined using a custom-built inertial measurement unit with the user blinded to the result. Comparison between the mechanical and digital devices showed that the mechanical device had an average error of −0.2, a standard deviation of 1.5, and range −3.3 to 2.6. The average root mean square error was 1.1 with a standard deviation of 0.9. Comparison of the inclinometer to the freehand technique showed that with the freehand component placement 50% of the surgeons were outside the acceptable range of 35–45 degrees. The use of the inclinometer resulted all participants to achieve placement within the acceptable range. It was noted that expert surgeons were more accurate at achieving the target inclination when compared to less experienced surgeons. This work demonstrates that the design and initial testing of a mechanical inclinometer is suitable for use in determining the acetabular cup inclination in THR. Experimental testing showed that the device is accurate to within acceptable limits and reliably improved the accuracy of uncemented cup implantation in all surgeons

Aims. The aims of this study were: firstly, to investigate the influence of the thickness of cartilage at the sigmoid notch on the inclination of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), and secondly, to compare the sensitivity and specificity of MRI with plain radiographs for the assessment of the inclination of the articular surface of the DRUJ in the coronal plane. . Patients and Methods. Contemporaneous MRI images and radiographs of 100 wrists from 98 asymptomatic patients (mean age 43 years, (16 to 67); 52 male, 53%) with no history of a fracture involving the wrist or surgery to the wrist, were reviewed. The thickness of the cartilage at the sigmoid notch, inclination of the DRUJ and Tolat Type of each DRUJ were determined. . Results. The assessment using MRI scans and cortical bone correlated well with radiographs, with a kappa value of 0.83. The mean difference between the inclination using the cortex and cartilage on MRI scans was 12°, leading to a change of Tolat type of inclination in 66% of wrists. No reverse oblique (Type 3) inclinations were found when using the cartilage to assess inclination. . Conclusion . These data revealed that when measuring the inclination of the DRUJ using cartilage, reverse oblique inclinations might not exist. The data suggest that performing an ulna shortening osteotomy might be reasonable even in distal radioulnar joints where the plain radiographic appearance suggests an unfavourable reverse oblique inclination in the coronal plane. We recommend using MRI to validate radiographs in those that appear to be reverse oblique (Tolat Type 3), as the true inclination might be different, thereby removing one possible contraindication to ulnar shortening. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:369–75

Acetabular morphology and orientation differs from ethnic group to another. Thus, investigating the normal range of the parameters that are used to assess both was a matter of essence. Nevertheless, the main aim of this study was clarification the relationship between acetabular inclination (AI) and acetabular and femoral head arcs’ radii (AAR and FHAR). A cross-sectional retrospective study that had been done in a tertiary center where Computed tomography abdomen scouts’ radiographs of non-orthopedics patients were included. They had no history of pelvic or hips’ related symptoms or fractures in femur or pelvis. A total of 84 patients was included with 52% of them were females. The mean of age was 30.38± 5.48. Also, Means of AI were 38.02±3.89 and 40.15±4.40 (P 0.02, significant gender difference) for males and females, respectively. Nonetheless, Head neck shaft angle (HNSA) means were 129.90±5.55 and 130.72±6.62 for males and females, respectively. However, AAR and FHAR means for males and females were 21.3±3.1mm, 19.9±3.1mm, P 0.04 and 19.7±3.1mm, 18.1±2.7mm, P 0.019, respectively. In addition, negative significant correlations were detected between AI against AAR, FHAR, HNSA and body mass index (BMI) (r 0.529, P ≤0.0001, r 0.445, P ≤0.0001, r 0.238, P 0.029, r 0.329, P ≤0.007, respectively). On the other hand, high BMI was associated with AAR and FHAR (r 0.577, P 0.0001 and r 0.266, p 0.031, respectively). This study shows that high AI is correlated with lower AAR, FHAR. Each ethnic group has its own normal values that must be studied to tailor the path for future implications in clinical setting

Background. Positioning of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty has profound effects on the biomechanics, stability and wear of the prosthesis. Normal anatomical position in females is 57 degrees (50 – 67 degrees) inclination with 19 degrees (9 – 32 degrees) of anteversion, whilst in males 56 degrees of inclination (48 – 66 degrees) with 19 degrees (9 – 32 degrees) is normal. In total hip arthroplasty, inclination recommendation ranges from 30 – 50 degrees. The aim of this study was to radiographically measure acetabular component position in total hip arthroplasty and compare to normal values. Method. The Widmer method was used by two independent observers to radiographically measure inclination in 522 patients using standard AP radiographs. Primary measures and variables were statistically analysed as was inter and intra observer reliability. All patients included within the study received total hip arthroplasty for age related degenerative changes to the hip. Operations were undertaken by 17 separate consultants or senior registrars under their care. Results. Overall mean inclination was measured at 45.27 degrees with a range of 26 – 68 degrees. Statistically significant differences were observed between cemented 45.9o and non-cemented hips 43.9 degrees (p= 0.018), Simple 45.5 degrees vs complex 42.1 degrees (p=0.003) and Male 44.3 degrees vs Female 46.2 degrees (p=0.0198). No statistical difference was seen between consultant and registrar (p=0.211) and right vs left (p=0.768). Inter observer reliability was seen to be 0.91 whilst intra observer reliability 0.96. Conclusion. Although a large range of outcomes were observed, 95% of radiographs reviewed fell within a range of 33.6 – 56.9 degrees Variables such as surgical positioning, patient anatomy/body habitus, surgical technique, instrumentation likely influenced abnormal results. Abnormal positioning may have effects such as eccentric wear and dislocation, however, and such findings are yet to be observed in the study group

Introduction. Glenoid inclination, defined as the angle formed by the intersection of a line made of the most superior and inferior points of the glenoid and a line formed by the supraspinatus fossa, has been postulated to impact the mechanical advantage of the rotator cuff in shoulder abduction. An increase in glenoid inclination has previously been reported in patients with massive rotator cuff tears and multiple studies have correlated rotator cuff tears to an increase of the critical shoulder angle, an angle comprised of both the glenoid inclination and acromical index. Glenoid inclination is best measured by the B-angle as it has been shown to be both an accurate and reliable. The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation of glenoid inclination and the presence of degenerative rotator cuff tears. Methods. Data was prospectively collected for study patients assigned to one of two groups. The tear group consisted of patients with degenerative, atraumatic rotator cuff tears, confirmed by MRI and the control group consisted of healthy volunteers without shoulder pain. Inclusion criteria for both groups included age 45 or older. Exclusion criteria included history of previous shoulder surgery, previous patient-recalled injury to the shoulder, presence of glenoid weak, and previous humerus or glenoid fracture. Patients were also excluded from the control group if any shoulder pain or history of rotator cuff disease was present. All patients had standard anterior/posterior shoulder radiographs taken and glenoid inclination was digitally measured with Viztek OpalRad PACS software (Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan). The beta angle was measured to determine the glenoid inclincation. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 23 (IBM, Aramonk, NY). Patient age and glenoid inclination were examined with the Shapiro-Wilk test of normality and then compared with student t tests. Gender distribution was compared with chi square test. A p-value of 0.05 was used to represent significance. Results. The study included 26 patients in the tear group and 23 patients in the control group. There was no difference in the age of the two groups (57 vs 54, p=0.292) or gender distribution (p=0.774). The average glenoid inclination was 11.18 (SD=2.67) degrees for the tear group and 5.97 (SD=2.55) degrees for the control group. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). Discussion. Glenoid inclination is significantly increased in patients with degenerative rotator cuff tears compared to healthy controls. Tendon overload secondary to increased glenoid inclination may be the primary anatomical factor contributing to the development of degenerative rotator cuff tears

The angle of inclination of the acetabular component in total hip replacement is a recognised contributing factor in dislocation and early wear. During non-navigated surgery, insertion of the acetabular component has traditionally been performed at an angle of 45° relative to the sagittal plane as judged by the surgeon’s eye, the operative inclination. Typically, the method used to assess inclination is the measurement made on the postoperative anteroposterior radiograph, the radiological inclination. The aim of this study was to measure the intra-operative angle of inclination of the acetabular component on 60 consecutive patients in the lateral decubitus position when using a posterior approach during total hip replacement. This was achieved by taking intra-operative photographs of the acetabular inserter, representing the acetabular axis, and a horizontal reference. The results were compared with the post-operative radiological inclination. The mean post-operative radiological inclination was 13° greater than the photographed operative inclination, which was unexpectedly high. It appears that in the lateral decubitus position with a posterior approach, the uppermost hemipelvis adducts, thus reducing the apparent operative inclination. Surgeons using the posterior approach in lateral decubitus need to aim for a lower operative inclination than when operating with the patient supine in order to achieve an acceptable radiological inclination

A high radiographic inclination angle (RI) contributes to accelerated wear and has been associated with dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). With freehand positioning of the acetabular component there is a lack of accuracy, with a trend towards a high radiographic inclination angle. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of a digital protractor to measure the operative inclination angle (OI) could improve the positioning of the acetabular component in relation to a ‘safe zone’. . We measured the radiographic inclination angles of 200 consecutive uncemented primary THAs. In the first 100 the component was introduced freehand and in the second 100 a digital protractor was used to measure the operative inclination angle. . The mean difference between the operative and the radiographic inclination angles (∆RI–OI) in the second cohort was 12.3° (3.8° to 19.8°). There was a strong correlation between the circumference of the hip and ∆RI–OI. The number of RI outliers was significantly reduced in the protractor group (p = 0.002). Adjusting the OI, using a digital protractor and taking into account the circumference of the patient’s hip, improves the RI significantly (p < 0.001) and does not require additional operating time. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:603–610

Objectives. The anteversion angle of the cup is important for achieving the stability and avoiding the dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We place the component considering with the change of inclination of pelvis with its posture change. We analyzed the perioperative pelvic inclination angles with posture change and the time course. Materials and Methods. We treated 40 hips in 40 patients (9 males and 31 females) with cementless THA that were performed from January 2007 to December 2008 in our hospital. 30 osteoarthritis hips, 3 rheumatoid arthritis hips and 7 idiopathic osteonecrosis hips were included. All patients were performed THA with VectorVision Hip 2.5.1 navigation system (BrainLAB, Feldkirchen, Germany). We used AMS HA cups and PerFix stems (KYOCERA Medical co., Osaka, Japan). The mean age of surgery was 59 years old (35–79 years old). The pelvic inclination angles (PIA) were measured with anteroposterior radiographic image in accordance with the Doiguchi's method. Results. The amount of change of the pelvic inclination angle between supine and standing position was 0.6 degrees prior to surgery, 0.7 degree at 1 year after surgery and 2.3 degrees at 3 years after surgery. 7 patients prior to surgery, 7 patient at 1 year after surgery and 13 patient at 3 year after surgery changed more than 5 degrees between supine and standing position. The pelvic inclination angles of 23 patients prior to surgery, 19 patients at 1 year after surgery and 29 patients at 3 years after surgery changed in the retroverted direction with posture change. It tended to increase after surgery. Discussion and Conclusions. When we place the acetabular component, it is important that the pelvic inclination angle in supine position according to preoperative planning and the change of pelvic inclination angle with posture change. The amount of change of PIA tended to increase at 3 year after surgery compared to 1 year after surgery. Moreover, we experienced some patients the amount of change of pelvic inclination angle between supine and standing position changed more than 10 degrees. If the pelvic inclination angle changes widely, it requires more attention because of a narrow safe margin for placing the acetabular component

Materials and Methods. We treated 60 hips in 60 patients (8 males and 52 females) with cementless THA that were performed from January 2007 to December 2009 in our hospital. 48 osteoarthritis hips, 5 rheumatoid arthritis hips and 7 idiopathic osteonecrosis hips were included. All patients were performed THA with VectorVision Hip navigation system (BrainLAB, Feldkirchen, Germany). We used AMS HA cups and PerFix stems (KYOCERA Medical co., Osaka, Japan). The mean age of surgery was 61 years old (35–79 years old). The pelvic inclination angles (PIA) were measured with anteroposterior radiographic image in accordance with the Doiguchi's method. Results. The amount of change of the pelvic inclination angle between supine and standing position was 0.6 degrees prior to surgery, 0.7 degree at 1 year after surgery and 2.4 degrees at 5 years after surgery. 7 patients prior to surgery, 7 patient at 1 year after surgery and 18 patient at 5 year after surgery changed more than 5 degrees between supine and standing position. The pelvic inclination angles of 23 patients prior to surgery, 19 patients at 1 year after surgery and 35 patients at 5 years after surgery changed in the retroverted direction with posture change. It tended to increase after surgery. Discussions and Conclusions. When we place the acetabular component, it is important that the pelvic inclination angle in supine position according to preoperative planning and the change of pelvic inclination angle with posture change. The amount of change of PIA tended to increase at 5 year after surgery compared to 1 year after surgery. Moreover, we experienced some patients the amount of change of pelvic inclination angle between supine and standing position changed more than 10 degrees. If the pelvic inclination angle changes widely, it requires more attention because of a narrow safe margin for placing the acetabular component

Our aim was to compare the degree of patellar descent and alteration in angle of the inclination of the tibial plateau in lateral closing-wedge and medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in 51 consecutive patients with osteoarthritis of the medial compartment and varus malalignment. Patellar height was measured by the Insall-Salvati (IS) and the Blackburne-Peel (BP) ratios. The tibial inclination was determined by the Moore-Harvey (MH) method. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to determine the influence of the type of HTO (closing vs opening wedge) on the post-operative patellar height or tibial inclination. The intra- and interobserver variability of these methods was determined before operation and at follow-up at one year. After an opening-wedge HTO the patellar height was significantly more decreased (mean post-operative difference: IS = 0.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06 to 0.23; BP = 0.11; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.18) compared with a closing-wedge HTO. The angle of tibial inclination differed significantly (mean post-operative difference MH = −6.40°; 95% CI −8.74 to −4.02) between the two HTO techniques, increasing after opening-wedge HTO and decreasing after closing-wedge HTO. There was no clinically-relevant difference in the intra- and interobserver variability of measurements of patellar height either before or after HTO

Restoration of ankle alignment is thought to be critical in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) outcomes, but previous research is primarily focused on coronal alignment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the sagittal alignment of the talar component. The talar component inclination, measured by the previously-described gamma angle, was hypothesized to be predictive of TAA outcomes. A retrospective review of the Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (COFAS) database of ankle arthritis was performed on all TAA cases at a single center over a 11-year period utilizing one of two modern implant designs. Cases without postoperative x-rays taken between 6 and 12 weeks were excluded. The gamma angle was measured by two independent orthopaedic surgeons twice each and standard descriptive statistics was done in addition to a survival analysis. The postoperative gamma angles were analyzed against several definitions of TAA failure and patient-reported outcome measures from the COFAS database by an expert biostatistician. 109 TAA cases satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria. An elevated postoperative gamma angle higher than 22 degrees was associated with talar component subsidence, defined as a change in gamma angle of 5 degrees or more between postoperative and last available followup radiographs. This finding was true when adjusting for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and inflammatory arthritis status. All measured angles were found to have good inter- and intraobserver reliability. Surgeons should take care to not excessively dorsiflex the talar cuts during TAA surgery. The gamma angle is a simple and reliable radiographic measurement to predict long-term outcomes of TAA and can help surgeons counsel their patients postoperatively

Introduction. In total hip arthroplasty (THA), a high radiographic inclination angle (RI) of the acetabular component has been linked to an increased dislocation rate, liner fracture, and increased wear. In contrast to version, we have more proven boundaries when it comes to a safe zone for angles of RI. Although intuitively it seems easier to achieve a target RI, most studies demonstrate a lack of accuracy and the trend towards a high RI with all surgical approaches when using a freehand technique or a mechanical guide. This is due to pelvic motion during surgery, which can be highly variable. The current study had two primary aims, each with a different primary outcome. The first aim was to determine how accurate a surgeon could obtain the target operative inclination (OI) during THA when using a cementless cup using a digital protractor. The second aim was to determine how accurate a surgeon can estimate the target OI to obtain a RI of 40° based on the patient's hip circumference as demonstrated in a previous study. Methods. In this prospective study, we included 200 consecutive patients undergoing uncemented primary THA in the lateral decubitus position using a posterior approach. Preoperatively, the surgeon determined the target OI based on the patient's hip circumference (22.5°, 25°, 27.5° or 30°). Intraoperatively, the effective OI was measured with the aid of a digital inclinometer after seating of the acetabular component. Six weeks postoperatively anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were made and two evaluators, blinded to the effective OI, measured the RI of the acetabular component. The safe zone for inclination was defined as 30°-45° of inclination. Results. The mean difference between the target OI and the effective OI of the acetabular component was −0.7° SD 1.4 (95% CI −0.9° to −0.5°). The difference between the target and effective OI was less than 1° in 108 patients (54%), less than 2° in 160 patients (80%) and less than 3° in 186 patients (93%). In 14 patients (7%) the difference was 3°-5°. The mean RI was 37.9° SD 4.7 (95% CI 37.2° to 38.5°). The mean difference between the RI and effective OI was 11.5° SD 4.7 (95% CI 10.8° to 12.1°). Overall, 188 cups (94%) were within the inclination safe zone. When analysing the RI outliers, 1 could have be avoided if a better target OI was chosen and 2 could have been avoided if the difference between the target and effective OI would have been smaller. For the remaining 9 outliers (75%) the difference between the RI and effective OI was in the upper and lower 7. th. percentile, indicating more or less than average motion of the pelvis in these patients. Discussion and Conclusions. When using a digital protractor, the mean difference between the target OI and the effective OI of the acetabular component was less than 3° in 93% and less than 5° in all patients. The use of a digital protractor allows surgeons to accurately implant the acetabular component in the desired OI in a cheap and easy way. By adjusting the target OI based on the patient's hip circumference, 94% of the acetabular components were placed within an inclination safe zone of 30°-45°. Most outliers were caused by more of less than average intraoperative pelvic motion

BACKGROUND. Abnormal glenoid version positioning has been recognized as a cause of glenoid component failure caused by the rocking horse phenomenon. In contrast, the importance of the glenoid inclination has not been investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The computed tomography scans of 152 healthy shoulders were evaluated. A virtual glenoid component was positioned in 2 different planes: the maximum circular plane (MCP) and the inferior circle plane (ICP). The MCP was defined by the best fitting circle of the most superior point of the glenoid and 2 points at the lower glenoid rim. The ICP was defined by the best fitting circle on the rim of the inferior quadrants. The inclination of both planes was measured as the intersection with the scapular plane. We defined the force vector of the rotator force couple and calculated the magnitude of the shear force vector on a virtual glenoid component in both planes during glenohumeral abduction. RESULTS. The inclination of the component positioned in the MCP averaged 95° (range, 84°–108°) and for the ICP averaged 111° (range, 94°–126°). A significant reduction in shear forces was calculated for the glenoid component in the ICP vs the MCP: 98% reduction in 60° of abduction to 49% reduction in 90° of abduction. CONCLUSION. Shear forces are significantly higher when the glenoid component is positioned in the MCP compared with the ICP, and this is more pronounced in early abduction. Positioning the glenoid component in the inferior circle might reduce the risk of a rocking horse phenomenon. Copyright © 2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

Introduction. A high inclination angle has been linked to an increased dislocation rate, liner fracture, and increased wear. The aim of this study was to compare the operative (OI) with the radiological inclination (RI) angle and determine the influence of patient morphology on pelvic tilt and cup inclination angle. Methods. In the first cohort of 100 patients undergoing uncemented primary total hip arthroplasty, the cup was inserted freehand. In the second cohort of 100 patients, the OI was measured with the aid of a digital inclinometer. RI and pelvic tilt in lateral decubitus were measured. Results. The mean RI in the freehand group was similar to the protractor group (38.5 SD 7.0 and 38.3 SD 4.7; p=0.83) with a significantly greater variance in the freehand group (range 22°-60° versus 27°-51°; p=0.0001) and more outliers for the inclination safe zone (24 versus 10; p=0.01). The mean difference between the RI and OI (ΔRI-OI) in the protractor group was 12.3° SD 4.2 (range 3.8°-19.8°). The mean pelvic tilt was 4.0° (SD 3.5) of adduction. Linear regression analysis demonstrated that RI was positively correlated with OI (r. 2. =0.44, p<0.0001). Hip circumference was negatively correlated with pelvic tilt (r. 2. =0.20, p=0.002) and ΔRI-OI (r. 2. =0.37, p=0.0001). There was a significant reduction in the number of inclination outliers over time in the second cohort (6 versus 2 versus 1 versus 1; p=0.04). Discussion. The mean ΔRI-OI was 12.3°. In patients with a larger hip circumference there was less pelvic tilt in the frontal plane and less ΔRI-OI. Surgeons using the posterior approach in lateral decubitus should aim for a lower OI in order to achieve an acceptable RI, especially in patients with a smaller hip circumference. Conclusion. In our hands, taking into account patient morphology and using a digital protractor intraoperatively has significantly reduced the number of inclination outliers

Background. Virtual planning of shoulder arthroplasty has gained recent popularity. Combined with patients specific instrumentation, several systems have been developed that allow the surgeon to accurately appreciate and correct glenoid deformities in version and inclination. While each virtual software platform utilizes a consistent algorithm for calculating these measurements, it is imperative for the surgeon to recognize any differences that may exist amongst software platforms and characterize any variability. Methods. A case-control study of all CT scans of patients previously pre-operatively planned using MatchPoint SurgiCase® software were uploaded into the BluePrint software. The cohort represents surgical planning for total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty with varying degrees of glenoid deformity. Glenoid version and inclination will be recorded for each CT scan using both software platforms. Results. A total of 38 patient CT scans previously planned using MatchPoint Surgicase® software were uploaded into the BluePrint software. The mean difference for glenoid version between the two software programs was 2.497° (±1.724°) with no significant differences in measured glenoid version readings between BluePrint and SurgiCase software (p=0.8127). No significant differences were seen in the measured glenoid inclination between the two software programs (p=0.733), with a mean difference for glenoid inclination between the two software programs at 5.150° ± 3.733° (figure 1). A Bland-Altman plot determined the 95% limits of agreement between the two programs at −5.879 to 6.116 degrees of glenoid version and −12.05 to 12.75 degrees of glenoid inclination. There was a significant statistical agreement between the two software programs measuring glenoid version and inclination in relation to glenoid wear position for the centered (p=0.004), posterior (p<0.001, p=0.003), posterior-superior (p<0.001, p<0.001), and superior (p=0.027, p=0.034) positions, respectively. Conclusions. Both BluePrint and SurgiCase software platforms yield similar measurements for glenoid version and glenoid inclination. In the setting of glenoid wear in the posterior, posterior-superior or superior position, measurements of between two surgical platforms are in agreement

Background. Cup inclination is a major factor in the success of a total hip replacement. An open cup position can lead to dislocation or increased wear from rim loading and a closed cup position lead to impingement against the femoral neck or psoas. Although the ideal inclination for cup position is recommended as between 40 and 45 degrees, accurate positioning of the implant might be influenced by pelvic flexion and movement of the patient's pelvis during the procedure. We wanted to examine if the transvers acetabular ligament (TAL) could be used to determine cup inclination intra-operatively. Methods. 16 hips from 9 cadaveric specimens were used for the study. A computer navigation system (Brain lab) was used to measure and document the exact inclination and version of the acetabular trial component in three positions: flush with the transvers acetabular ligament (TAL), with the rim of the cup 5 mm from the TAL in a cranial direction and with the rim of the cup 5 mm caudally displaced. Statistical analysis of the results was performed by the Department of Biostatistics. Findings. With the cup positioned flush with the TAL, the average version was 43 degrees (range 37 to 47 degrees.) When there was a 5 mm gap between the TAL and the cup the average inclination was 28 degrees (21 to 35 degrees.) When the cup was opened so it covered the TAL by 5 mm the average inclination increased to 64 degrees (55 to 75 degrees.) The average anteversion angle was 18 degrees (range 15 to 25 degrees.). Conclusion. We found the transverse acetabular ligament to be an accurate landmark for positioning of the femoral implant as far as version and inclination was concerned. We recommend positioning the acetabular component flush with the TAL as cup inclination was shown to be ideal in all cases when we adhered to that principle. NO DISCLOSURES