The 2020-2021 Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS) match year was altered on an unprecedented scale. Visiting electives were cancelled at a national level, and the CaRMS interview tour was moved to a virtual model. These changes posed a significant challenge to both prospective students and program directors (PDs), requiring each party to employ alternative strategies to distinguish themselves throughout the match process. For a variety of reasons, including a decline in applicant interest secondary to reduced job prospects, the field of orthopaedic surgery was identified as vulnerable to many of these changes, creating a window of opportunity to evaluate their impacts on students and recruiting residency programs. This longitudinal survey study was disseminated to match-year medical students (3rd and 4th year) with an interest in orthopaedic surgery, as well as orthopaedic surgery program directors. Responses to the survey were collected using an electronic form designed in Qualtrics (Qualtrics, 2021, Provo, Utah, USA). Students were contacted through social media posts, as well as by snowball sampling methods through appropriate medical student leadership intermediates. The survey was disseminated to all 17 orthopedic surgery program directors in Canada. A pre-match and post-match iteration of this survey were designed to identify whether expectations differed from reality regarding the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the CaRMS match 2020-2021 process. A similar package was disseminated to Canadian orthopaedic surgery program directors pre-match, with an option to opt-in for a post-match survey follow-up. This survey had a focus on program directors’ opinions of various novel communication, recruitment, and assessment strategies, in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Students’ responses to the loss of visiting electives were negative. Despite a reduction in financial stress associated with reduced need to travel (p=0.001), this was identified as a core component of the clerkship experience. In the case of virtual interviews, students’ initial trepidation pre-CaRMS turned into a positive outlook post-CaRMS (significant improvement, p=0.009) indicating an overall satisfaction with the virtual interview format, despite some concerns about a reduction in their capacity to network. Program directors and selection committee faculty also felt positively about the virtual interview format. Both students and program directors were overwhelmingly positive about virtual events put on by both school programs and student-led initiatives to complement the CaRMS tour. CaRMS was initially developed to facilitate the matching process for both students and programs alike. We hope to continue this tradition of student-led and student-informed change by providing three evidence-based recommendations. First, visiting electives should not be discontinued in future iterations of CaRMS if at all possible. Second, virtual interviews should be considered as an alternative approach to the CaRMS interview tour moving forward. And third, ongoing virtual events should be associated with a centralized platform from which programs can easily communicate virtual sessions to their target audience

Introduction. We undertook a qualitative study to explore what is important to people with lower limb conditions requiring reconstruction (LLR) and how it impacted their quality of life (QOL), in order to develop a conceptual framework for a new patient reported outcome measure (PROM). This builds on a previous qualitative evidence synthesis of existing research to develop a preliminary conceptual framework as part of the Patient Reported Outcomes for Lower Limb Reconstruction (PROLLIT) study. Materials and Methods. Patients (n=32) and Orthopaedic staff (n=23) were interviewed (November 2020-June 2021) from three centres in England using one-to-one, semi-structured interviews. Patient interviews focused on experiences during and after LLR, including impact on QOL. Staff interviews explored important outcomes and goals for patients and how the LLR impacted QOL. Recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Results. The conceptual framework consists of 6 overarching factors important to patients: Pain, Identity, Work, Daily lifestyle, Emotional well-being and Support. These factors are not independent of each other, rather they're all interrelated (e.g. pain impacts identity, work, emotional well-being and daily lifestyle. Work impacts identity, pain, emotional well-being and daily lifestyle). Support from the hospital, physiotherapists and family underpins the other factors and acts as a moderator of their influence. Conclusions. This conceptual framework displays key factors important to patients after a LLR. Further research is required to map these factors onto existing PROMs to establish whether the factors we identified are captured by existing PROMs

Aims. The principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM) are the foundation of modern medical practice. Surgeons are familiar with the commonly used statistical techniques to test hypotheses, summarize findings, and provide answers within a specified range of probability. Based on this knowledge, they are able to critically evaluate research before deciding whether or not to adopt the findings into practice. Recently, there has been an increased use of artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze information and derive findings in orthopaedic research. These techniques use a set of statistical tools that are increasingly complex and may be unfamiliar to the orthopaedic surgeon. It is unclear if this shift towards less familiar techniques is widely accepted in the orthopaedic community. This study aimed to provide an exploration of understanding and acceptance of AI use in research among orthopaedic surgeons. Methods. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were carried out on a sample of 12 orthopaedic surgeons. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify key themes. Results. The four intersecting themes identified were: 1) validity in traditional research, 2) confusion around the definition of AI, 3) an inability to validate AI research, and 4) cautious optimism about AI research. Underpinning these themes is the notion of a validity heuristic that is strongly rooted in traditional research teaching and embedded in medical and surgical training. Conclusion. Research involving AI sometimes challenges the accepted traditional evidence-based framework. This can give rise to confusion among orthopaedic surgeons, who may be unable to confidently validate findings. In our study, the impact of this was mediated by cautious optimism based on an ingrained validity heuristic that orthopaedic surgeons develop through their medical training. Adding to this, the integration of AI into everyday life works to reduce suspicion and aid acceptance. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(9):696–703

Aims. Patients undergoing limb reconstruction surgery often face a challenging and lengthy process to complete their treatment journey. The majority of existing outcome measures do not adequately capture the patient-reported outcomes relevant to this patient group in a single measure. Following a previous systematic review, the Stanmore Limb Reconstruction Score (SLRS) was designed with the intent to address this need for an effective instrument to measure patient-reported outcomes in limb reconstruction patients. We aim to assess the face validity of this score in a pilot study. Methods. The SLRS was designed following structured interviews with several groups including patients who have undergone limb reconstruction surgery, limb reconstruction surgeons, specialist nurses, and physiotherapists. This has subsequently undergone further adjustment for language and clarity. The score was then trialled on ten patients who had undergone limb reconstruction surgery, with subsequent structured questioning to understand the perceived suitability of the score. Results. Ten patients completed the score and the subsequent structured interview. Considering the tool as a whole, 100% of respondents felt the score to be comprehensible, relevant, and comprehensive regarding the areas that were important to a patient undergoing limb reconstruction surgery. For individual questions, on a five-point Likert scale, importance/relevance was reported as a mean of 4.78 (4.3 to 5.0), with ability to understand rated as 4.92 (4.7 to 5.0) suggesting high levels of relevance and comprehension. Flesch-Kincaid reading grade level was calculated as 5.2 (10 to 11 years old). Conclusion. The current SLRS has been shown to have acceptable scores from a patient sample regarding relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness. This suggests face validity, however further testing required and is ongoing in a larger cohort of patients to determine the reliability, responsiveness, precision, and criterion validity of the score in this patient group. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(9):705–709

Pacific people in New Zealand experience significant disparity in health outcomes. There is little known about the burden of arthritis within this community or difficulties accessing specialist orthopaedic care. This qualitative study evaluated the experiences of Pacific patients who underwent hip or knee arthroplasty with a goal to identify barriers to accessing arthroplasty for this community. We interviewed Pacific patients within the Bay of Plenty region who had received either elective hip or knee arthroplasty between 2013 and 2022. Interviews were centred on perceptions of arthritis severity, duration of symptoms, primary care and specialist interactions. Patients were encouraged to offer feedback on ways to improve this experience. We identified 6087 publicly funded primary joints performed in Tauranga hospital and 58 patients were of Pacific ethnicity. After exclusion criteria was applied, we successfully interviewed 20 patients eligible for our study. Pacific patients represented 2.9% of the of the BOP catchment but only received 0.43% of the publicly funded joints. Most reported reluctance to seek help from primary care until symptoms were present for at least a year. Most commonly cited reasons for not seeking help were fear of hospital services and lack of awareness in the community about osteoarthritis. We identified a lack of community awareness of osteoarthritis and arthroplasty among Pacific. This may result in delayed presentation to primary care and decreased utilisation of publicly funded joint surgery. It is reassuring that most patients of Pacific ethnicity who receive primary hip or knee arthroplasty report a positive experience. Public health initiatives together with positive feedback from Pacific patients who have undergone surgery will help to increase awareness of arthroplasty as an option to restore function and relieve pain

Introduction. LIMB-Q Kids is a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for children with Lower limb differences (LLDs). The objective is to conduct an international field test study. Materials & Methods. A mixed method multiphase approach was used to develop LIMB-Q Kids. In phase one, a systematic review was conducted to identify concepts from existing PROMs used in research with children with LLDs. A preliminary conceptual framework derived from the systematic review informed an international qualitative study. The data from qualitative interviews were used to form the LIMB-Q Kids, which was further refined through multiple rounds of cognitive debriefing interviews with children. Input was obtained from parents and healthcare professionals from Australia, Canada, Ethiopia, India, UK, and the USA. LIMB-Q Kids was translated and culturally adapted into multiple languages. Results. The final field-test version consists of 11 scales (159 items) that measure appearance, physical function, symptoms (hip, knee, ankle, foot, and leg), leg-related distress, and school, social and psychological function. This version was rigorously translated into Danish and German. Translations that are in progress include Arabic, Finnish, Hindi, Swahili, Portuguese, Spanish, and Luganda. An international field-test study is underway in nine countries (15 sites with a target recruitment of 150 participants per country). At the time of abstract submission, 190 patients from seven sites have completed LIMB-Q Kids. The UK collaborative has worked on language adaption for the UK and is currently validating the score across five paediatric limb reconstruction units. Conclusions. No internationally applicable PROM exists for children with LLDs. We present the current progress in developing and validating such a score. Data from the international field-test study will be used to reduce items and perform psychometric testing of LIMB-Q Kids. The rigorous translation and cultural adaption process will provide versions of LIMB-Q Kids in different languages. Once completed, the LIMB-Q Kids will provide a common metric for outcome assessment for children with lower limb differences internationally

There have been no studies assessing the acceptability of opioid tapering in the pre-arthroplasty setting. This qualitative study aimed to (1) explore barriers and facilitators to opioid tapering amongst patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP), and (2) explore the similarities and differences in acceptability of opioid tapering between pre-arthroplasty patients and those participating in a biopsychosocial pain management program. From January 2021, adult participants diagnosed with CNCP and taking opioids daily (any dose at time of screening for a period of 3 months) were recruited from either Fairfield Orthopaedic Hip and Knee Service (FOHKS) or Liverpool Hospital Pain Clinic (LHPC). Semi-structured interviews underwent thematic analysis using the framework method. 17 participants were recruited (FOHKS, n=9, mean age 67, female 77%, LHPC, n=8, mean age 54, female 63%). Both groups had participants who; (i) were reluctant to use opioid medications and used them out of “necessity”, (ii) were reluctant to taper due to concerns of worsening pain, quality of life, (iii) believed opioids were “toxins” causing bodily harm. Some FOHKS participants believed tapering should be a post-operative focus, whilst others believed tapering opioids pre-operatively will assist in post-op pain management. Few LHPC participants felt dependent/addicted to opioids, thus driving their intention to taper opioids. The belief of tapering opioids causing worse pain was based on either previous experiences or concerns alone. Some FOHKS participants were more inclined to taper opioids if they were educated on the chronic and peri-operative risks associated with using opioids at time of arthroplasty. Opioid users recognise the harms associated with chronic opioid use and believe they are used out of desperation for adequate analgesia, function, and quality of life. Tapering opioids in the pre-arthroplasty context may need coupling with patient education highlighting the importance of opioid tapering pre-operatively

Lisfranc injuries account for 0.2% of all fractures and have been linked to poorer functional outcomes, in particular resulting in post-traumatic arthritis, midfoot collapse and chronic pain. This study assesses the longitudinal functional outcomes in patients with low and high energy Lisfranc injuries treated both operatively and non-operatively. Patients above 16 years with Lisfranc injuries from January 2008 and December 2017 were identified through the Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes (VOTOR) registry. Follow-up performed at 6, 12 and 24 months through telephone interviews with response rate of 86.1%, 84.2% and 76.2% respectively. Longitudinal functional outcome data using Global Outcome Assessment, EQ-5D-5L, numerical pain scale, Short-Form 12, the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule and return to work status were collected. Univariate analysis was performed and variables showing a significant difference between groups (p < 0.25) were analysed with multivariable mixed effects regression model. 745 patients included in this retrospective cohort study. At 24 months, both the operative and non-operative groups demonstrated similar functional outcomes trending towards an improvement. Mixed effect regression models for the EQ items for mobility (OR 1.80, CI 0.91 – 3.57), self-care (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.09-3.49), usual activities (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.99-1.03), pain (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.61-1.89), anxiety (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72-2.34) and pain scale (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.51 – 2.22) and return to work (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.56-2.91) between groups were very similar and not statistically significantly different. We concluded that there was no statistically significant difference between operative and non-operative patients with low and high energy Lisfranc injuries. Current clinical practices in Lisfranc injury management are appropriate and not inadvertently causing any further harm to patients. Future research comparing fracture patterns, fixation types and corresponding functional outcomes can help determine gold standard Lisfranc injury management

Introduction. Patients undergoing limb reconstruction surgery often face a challenging and often lengthy process to complete their treatment journey. The majority of existing outcome measures do not adequately capture the patient reported outcomes relevant to this patient group in a single measure. Following a previous systematic review, the Stanmore Limb Reconstruction Score (SLRS) was designed with the intent to address this need for an effective instrument to measure patient reported outcomes in limb reconstruction patients. Materials and Methods. The SLRS was designed following the use of structured interviews with a group of patients who have undergone limb reconstruction surgery, limb reconstruction surgeons, specialist nurses and physiotherapists. This has undergone further adjustment for language and clarity. The score was then trialled on 10 patients who have been through the process of limb reconstruction surgery, with subsequent structured questioning to understand the perceived suitability. Results. Ten patients have completed the score and the subsequent structured interview. All patients found the score acceptable to complete in the time while waiting in clinic. Considering the tool as a whole, 100% of respondents felt the score to be comprehensible, relevant and comprehensive regarding the areas that were important to a patient undergoing limb reconstruction surgery. For individual questions, on a 5 point Likert scale, importance/relevance was reported as a mean of 4.78 (4.3–5), with ability to understand rated as 4.92 (4.7–5) suggesting high levels of relevance and comprehension. Flesh-Kincaid reading grade level was calculated as 5.2 (10–11 years old). Conclusions. The current Stanmore limb reconstruction score has been shown to have acceptable scores from a patient sample regarding relevance, comprehensibility and comprehensiveness. This demonstrates face validity, however further testing required and is ongoing in a larger cohort of patients to determine the reliability, responsiveness, precision and criterion validity of the score in this patient group

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the reasons for delay to surgery are secondary to health system constraints or patient factors. This study explored factors that contribute to patients' delay to surgery as well as how patients perceive the delay in surgery to have affected their treatment and care. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 30 patients aged 18 to 50 years old who had undergone arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. Qualitative data analysis was performed in accordance with the Straus and Corbin theory to derive codes, categories and themes. Patient interviews revealed three overarching themes regarding delay to ACL reconstruction surgery: access to care, finances and work, and personal advocacy. Elements of those factors were shown to influence the timing of ACL reconstruction surgery. Less common factors included choice of imaging study (i.e., ultrasound), geography, and family commitments. Patients' perceptions of delay in access to care was overwhelming due to the wait time for MRI. Several patients also described significant self-advocacy required to navigate the healthcare system, suggesting that some level of medical literacy may be necessary to gain timely access to surgery. Once patients had seen the surgeon, few patients described untimely delay to surgery, suggesting that OR resources are adequate. Recommendations to decrease delays to ACL reconstruction surgery include better access to MRI and broader education of non-surgical healthcare providers to help navigate access to surgery

Introduction. Hip arthrodiastasis for paediatric hip conditions such as Perthes disease is growing in popularity. Intended merits include halting the collapse of the femoral head and maintaining sphericity by minimising the joint reaction force. This can also be applied to protecting hip reconstruction following treatment of hip dysplasia. Our aim was to assess functional outcomes and complications in a cohort of paediatric patients. Materials and Methods. A retrospective single-surgeon cohort study was performed in a University teaching hospital from 2018–2021. Follow-up was performed via telephone interview and review of patient records. Complications, time in frame and functional scores using the WOMAC hip score were recorded. Results. Following review, 26 procedures were identified in 24 patients. Indications included 16 cases of Perthes disease, 4 following slipper upper femoral epiphysis, 3 avascular necrosis, and single cases following infection, dysplasia and a bone cyst. Pre-treatment WOMAC scores averaged 53.9, improving to 88.5 post-removal. Pin site infections were encountered in 11 patients, all treated with oral antibiotics. Two patients required early removal of frame due to pin loosening. Average time in frame was 3.9 months. Conclusions. This series displays how hip arthrodiastasis can be used to manage paediatric hip conditions. Complex reconstructions may be required in patients with severe deformity following perthes disease, DDH or SUFE. The use of arthrodiastasis in these patients aims to protect the reconstruction and potentially improve outcomes. A dedicated team of specialist nurses, physiotherapists and psychologists are crucial to the treatment program

The patient's subjective experience of disease is an increasing focus in health care delivery. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is defined as a “functional effect of a medical condition and its consequent treatment”; it is both self-reported and multi-dimensional. While functional outcome is well researched among the soft tissue sarcoma (STS) population, few studies have focused on HRQoL, which gives a broader understanding of the psychological, somatic, social and physical toll of cancer and its treatment from the patient's viewpoint. The biologic and anatomic heterogeneity of sarcomas are considerable, just as the treatments are diverse, we surmise that the indicators of patient HRQoL differ and are not captured in existing generic HRQoL tools for cancer. The study objectives were to explore the domains of HRQoL and functioning in adult patients diagnosed with extremity STS from the patient's perspective from active care through survivorship through qualitative inquiry, so as to form the basis for the development of a patient-derived, sarcoma-specific, preference based HRQoL tool. Study design is a sequential exploratory mixed methods study of patient experience in localized or metastatic adult extremity STS (2007 and 2017). The study was conducted at a high-volume sarcoma centre. Qualitative descriptive design was grounded in an integrated knowledge translation approach and aimed at identifying HRQoL domains through in-person and electronic focus groups, and individual semi-structured interviews in both English and French (N=28). The interview guide topics were selected based on existing knowledge about PROs and HRQoL life, including (a) impact of diagnosis on employment or acquisition of academic/vocational skills; (b) physical and psychological functioning; (c) symptom burden; (d) treatment preferences; (e) knowledge of and use of existing resources; (f) impact on family time and resources; and (g) overall experience. Data was analyzed using inductive thematic networks approach using the qualitative software N-Vivo 12. Codes were generated by 2 independent qualitative experts capturing key concepts of HRQoL that is impacted by STS. Basic themes were clustered into organizing themes, and merged into global domains. Attention was paid to deviant cases and within-group dynamics during focus group discussion analysis. Discrepancies or inconsistencies in coding were resolved in consensus meetings. Final sample size was determined when data saturation was reached and no new themes emerged. Qualitative reduction of identified items to reach a consensus framework was facilitated by a moderator during multi-disciplinary panel meetings comprised of sarcoma experts, patient partners, allied health staff and other stakeholders. Twenty-nine patients with biopsy-proven localized or metastatic STS of the extremity participated (69% lower extremity STS; mean age 56 years, 25% with local recurrence, 21% metastatic, 18% amputation). Inductive thematic network analysis revealed five function-related domains HRQoL for patients with STS. The functional domains were mapped to the Wilson & Cleary Model and experience domains were mapped to the Picker Institute's Through Patient's Eyes model. This is a critical step toward developing disease specific outcome measures. Patient-centered research is crucial to understanding the impact of surgery, adjuvant therapy and the associated complications for patients with extremity STS, and thereby improving the quality of care provision. This study offers a unique perspective on what domains and sub domains are most impactful on HRQoL and provides the basis for our on-going development of a disease-specific, preference-based HRQoL measure

The primary goal of this study was to understand the subjective impact of a diagnosis of Simple Bone Cyst on children with regards to activity participation and psychosocial development. We aimed to explore the concepts of labeling, embodiment and activity participation to understand the impact of SBC. This was a qualitative study. Ten children between the ages of 4 and 17 years with SBC and their families participated in semi-structured interviews related to activity participation, social interactions and psychological impact of SBC. Interview questions were derived from psychology, sociology and philosophy literatures pertaining to illness and activity, sense of embodiment, self-concept and interactions with the social environment. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. First, children and families view SBC as an injury more than an illness and did not experience labeling or significant changes in embodiment. Second, SBCs cause anxiety in children related fear of fracture or pain, however normal function and activity participation were maintained. Third, there were significant shortcomings identified in the communication and the decision-making process between families and physicians regarding SBC management. SBC as a benign disease does not neatly fit into the category of illness or injury based on children's experiences. Children who previously perceived themselves as normal feel different and not normal following diagnosis with SBC. The experience of parents is largely one of anxiety, and much of that anxiety is derived from the uncertainty over the treatment plans for their child. The proposed framework of normality allows for the more temporary and fluid changes in perception experienced by the children in our study. The results of this study suggest that the current decision-making process in SBC is unsatisfactory leading to anxiety and worry. Parents felt pressure to make decisions regarding surgery without feeling that they sufficient information. Though understanding how children experience SBCs and how parents experience the treatment course of their child with SBC, we can shared decision-making as a potential way to reduce parents' anxiety and limit negative experience in children

The process of obtaining informed consent is an important and complex pursuit, especially within a paediatric setting. Medical governing bodies have stated that the role of the trainee surgeon must be explained to patients and their families during the consent process. Despite this, attitudes and practices of surgeons and their trainees regarding disclosure of the trainee's participation during the consent process has not been reported in the paediatric setting. Nineteen face-to-face interviews were conducted with surgical trainees and staff surgeons at a tertiary level paediatric hospital in Toronto, Canada. These were transcribed and subsequently thematically coded by three reviewers. Five main themes were identified from the interviews. 1) Surgeons do not consistently disclose the role of surgical trainees to parents. 2) Surgical trainees are purposefully vague in disclosing their role during the consent discussion without being misleading. 3) Surgeons and surgical trainees believe parents do not fully understand the specific role of surgical trainees. 4) Graduated responsibility is an important aspect of training surgeons. 5) Surgeons feel a responsibility towards both their patients and their trainees. Surgeons don't explicitly inform patients about the involvement of trainees, believing there is a lack of understanding of the training process. Trainee perspectives reflect this, with the view that families are aware of their participation but likely underestimate their role, and suggest that information is kept purposely vague to reduce anxiety. The majority of surgeons and surgical trainees do not voluntarily disclose the degree of trainee participation in surgery during the informed consent discussion with parents. An open and honest discussion should occur, allowing for parents to make an informed decision regarding their child's care. Further patient education regarding trainees' roles would help develop a more thorough and patient centred informed consent process

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is considered as one of the most successful and cost-effective medical interventions yet it is consistently reported that up to 20% of patients are dissatisfied with their outcomes. Patient satisfaction is correlated with the fulfillment of expectations and an important aspect of this involves good surgeon-patient communication, which itself is a contributor to TKA satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a checklist intended to enhance the quality of surgeon-patient communication by optimizing the surgeon's role in helping patients set (or reset) and manage post-TKA expectations that are realistic, achievable, and most importantly, patient-specific. In this prospective mixed methods study, a communication checklist was developed from the analysis of interviews with patients who were between six weeks and six months post-TKA. Four orthopaedic surgeons then used the checklist to guide discussions with patients about post-operative expectations and outcomes during follow-up visits between six weeks and six months. A visual analogue scale was used to survey two groups of patients on five measures of satisfaction: the standard of care communication group and the intervention group who had received the checklist. The mean scores of the two groups were compared using independent t-tests. The duration of follow-up visits was also tracked to determine if the checklist took significantly more time in practice. Themes from the qualitative analysis of eight patient interviews incorporated into the checklist included pain management, medication, physiotherapy, and general concerns and questions. The quantitative study comprised 127 participants, 67 in the standard of care communication group and 60 in the checklist group. There were no significant group differences in gender, BMI, comorbidities, post-operative complications, marital or occupational status, however the standard of care group was older by six years (p < .001). The checklist group reported significantly greater satisfaction on four of the five measures of satisfaction: TKA satisfaction and expectations met (p = .017), care and concern shown by the surgeons (p = .011), surgeons' communication ability (p = .008), and satisfaction with time surgeons spent with patients during follow-up visits (p < .001). Satisfaction with the TKA for relieving pain and restoring function was not significant (p = .064). Although the checklist increased the average clinic visit time by only 1 minute, 51 seconds, it was significantly greater (p = .001). The impact of age and gender on satisfaction was explored using a two-way analysis of variance. No significant effects or interactions were observed. Checklists have been shown to decrease medical errors and improve overall standards of patient care but no published research to date has used a communication checklist to enhance orthopaedic surgeon-patient communication. The present findings indicate that this simple tool can significantly increase patient satisfaction. This has practical significance because patient satisfaction is a metric that is increasingly used as a key performance indicator for surgeons and health care institutions alike. Increased TKA satisfaction will benefit patients, surgeons, and the health care system overall

Purpose of study. To determine the onset, incidence and associated symptoms of adverse noise emissions following total hip arthroplasty (THA) with ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing surfaces. Methods. 50 Sequential CoC THA's (45 patients) performed by a single surgeon were interviewed telephonically at an average post-operative period of 12 months. The same group was re-interviewed telephonically 12 months later. Patients who reported noise emissions at either interview were assessed clinically to determine if symptoms could be reproduced. Results. Of the 45 patients who underwent the first interview, 43 (48 THA's) were re- interviewed. 1 patient had died of an unrelated cause before the second interview, and 2 were not contactable. 2 patients (4%) reported noise emissions at the first interview and 8 (17%) at the second interview. 7 of these 8 patients reported a single or occasional sound. 1 patient reported regular noise emissions and she was the only patient who expressed concern about the noise. None of the patients reported pain or any other symptoms associated with the sound. In none of the cases could the noise be produced during clinical examination. The examiners were unable to demonstrate a correlation between reported noise emissions and radiographic assessment of component orientation. Discussion. When asked specifically about noise emissions, 17% of the patients in our series reported a noise. The majority of these patients (75%) reported no noises when interviewed initially (1 year following surgery), but did report noise emissions when re-interviewed a year later. The incidence as well as onset of reported noise emissions in our series correlates with those reported by other authors. NO DISCLOSURES

Introduction. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a rapidly implemented restructuring of UK healthcare services. The The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, became a central hub for the provision of trauma services for North Central/East London (NCEL) while providing a musculoskeletal tumour service for the south of England, the Midlands, and Wales and an urgent spinal service for London. This study reviews our paediatric practice over this period in order to share our experience and lessons learned. Our hospital admission pathways are described and the safety of surgical and interventional radiological procedures performed under general anaesthesia (GA) with regards to COVID-19 in a paediatric population are evaluated. Methods. All paediatric patients (≤ 16 years) treated in our institution during the six-week peak period of the pandemic were included. Prospective data for all paediatric trauma and urgent elective admissions and retrospective data for all sarcoma admissions were collected. Telephone interviews were conducted with all patients and families to assess COVID-19 related morbidity at 14 days post-discharge. Results. Overall, 100 children underwent surgery or interventional radiological procedures under GA between 20 March and 8 May 2020. There were 35 trauma cases, 20 urgent elective orthopaedic cases, two spinal emergency cases, 25 admissions for interventional radiology procedures, and 18 tumour cases. 78% of trauma cases were performed within 24 hours of referral. In the 97% who responded at two weeks following discharge, there were no cases of symptomatic COVID-19 in any patient or member of their households. Conclusion. Despite the extensive restructuring of services and the widespread concerns over the surgical and anaesthetic management of paediatric patients during this period, we treated 100 asymptomatic patients across different orthopaedic subspecialties without apparent COVID-19 or unexpected respiratory complications in the early postoperative period. The data provides assurance for health care professionals and families and informs the consenting process. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:287–292

Introduction. Entry into orthopaedic higher surgical training remains extremely competitive, however little evidence exists regarding the validity of short-listing and interviewing for selection. This paper assesses the relative correlations of short-listing and interview scores in predicting subsequent performance as an orthopaedic trainee. Methods. We compared data from the selection process (short-listing and interview scores) to subsequent performance during training (academic output and an annual assessment score by Programme Director). Data was prospectively collected from 115 trainees on the South West Thames region of the U.K. during 2000–2010. Results. We found that trainees achieving an interview score within the top third subsequently produced a higher academic output and had a higher annual assessment score than their peers (MANOVA, p>0.05) see Figure 1. [Academic output vs interview score rank (thirds)]. The short-listing scores did not correlate with subsequent academic output or annual assessment score see Figure 2. [Academic output vs shortlist score rank (thirds)]. We found no statistical correlation between the short-listing and interview scores (r. 2. < 0.1). Discussion. This study provides an evidence base to support the value of interviews by senior surgeons in the selection of trainees. We support the following selection process for orthopaedic trainees: long listing followed by a competitive interview(s) of all remaining candidates

The study used a qualitative methodology to explore the attitudes and beliefs of military physiotherapists and how these influenced the management of military patients presenting with chronic low back pain. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with a sample of 16 military physiotherapists; the transcripts were analysed using a method of thematic content analysis. Analysis of semi-structured interviews undertaken resulted in the identification of six themes. These were: military culture, occupational issues, continuing professional development, clinical reasoning, need for cure and labelling the patient. The importance of understanding the occupational demands on their patients was considered highly significant by all of the military physiotherapists interviewed. However, there appeared generally poor knowledge of the biopsychosocial model in the management of low back pain and over-reliance on the medical model. Three-quarters of the military physiotherapists interviewed expressed frustration in their management of patients with low back pain. Similarly, the military physiotherapists displayed a poor awareness of current evidence-based clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain. The themes military culture and occupational issues were significant in influencing the military physiotherapist's clinical management. The highly physical and arduous nature of military occupations resulted in investigative procedures being requested at an earlier stage than is recommended in the current evidence-based guidelines. Justification for early investigations was provided on the basis of the unique occupational factors combined with requirement to optimise the number of military personnel able to deploy operationally. It was concluded that the management of low back pain in military personnel could be improved by increasing awareness of the current evidence-based guidelines. This would benefit both patients and the Armed Services, by reducing the disability caused by low back pain and increasing the number of operationally deployable service personnel

Background. Hip replacement surgery is an effective treatment, however quantitative outcome does not necessarily delineate the true picture. It is important to triangulate data methods in order to ascertain important contextual factors that may influence patient perception. Aims. The aim of the current study was to explore the patient perception on resurfacing hip arthroplasty (RHA) and mini-hip arthroplasty (MHA) in a unique cohort where each patient has received a resurfacing on one side and a mini-hip on the contralateral side using both quantitative and qualitative measures (Fig. 1). Materials and methods. We identified patients in our Practice database that had undergone RHA on one side and MHA in the opposite hip. All prostheses were implanted by two experienced surgeons using a posterior approach and followed a standard anaesthetic protocol, post-operative care and rehabilitation guidelines. The patients received Cormet 2000 hip resurfacing and MiniHip (Corin®, Ciencester, UK) implants. Data were collected pre-operatively and post-operatively at weeks 6, 12, 26 52 and annually thereafter. The data included demographic details, mHHS (modified Harris Hip Score), patient satisfaction and a qualitative semi-structured interview. Data analysis was done using both quantitative (descriptive statistics, student's t-test) and qualitative (constant comparative method of grounded theory). Results. There were 24 hips in 12 patients with mean age of 63.6 years (range 42,81) and a mean follow-up of 5.3 years (SD 4.2). The mean mHHS in pre-operative and one-year post-operative period for RHA was 50.9 (SD 22.9, range 9,71) and 82.6 (SD 11.2, range 67,91) respectively with a mean improvement of 32.9. The mean mHHS in pre-operative and one-year post-operative period for MHA was 47.83 (SD 14.6, range 20,62) and 83.2 (SD 27.3 range 53,94) respectively with mean improvement of 35.3. There was no significant difference in mHHS in the two groups (p=0.26). However, the qualitative analysis showed that a patient's perception of improvement did not always reflect the validated score improvement such as in mHHS. In 8/24 of arthroplasty cases the mHHS indicated a high return to functionality, however, interview highlighted perception of a reduction in certain aspects such as range of movement and ability to perform at a high-level such as competitive windsurfing (2/24), skiing (6/24) or martial arts (2/24). The results, therefore, suggest that the quantitative data is not sensitive enough to deduce return to function in a specialised subset of patients. The interviews indicate a marginal preference for resurfacing due to improved stability. However, the differential to the satisfaction with the mini hip was not sufficient for the potential metal ion problem to be ignored and therefore mini hip was shown to offer a reasonable bone-conserving alternative. Conclusions. Results indicate the need for more than just a quantitative score to demonstrate satisfaction and that RHA generally offers better results although when the metal ion problem is taken into account the MHA can offer sufficient function and satisfaction as an alternative