Aims. The purpose of this study was to evaluate unexpected positive cultures in total hip arthroplasty (THA) revisions for presumed aseptic loosening, to assess the prevalence of low-grade infection using two definition criteria, and to analyze its impact on implant survival after revision. Methods. A total of 274 THA revisions performed for presumed aseptic loosening from 2012 to 2016 were reviewed. In addition to obtaining intraoperative tissue cultures from all patients, synovial and sonication fluid samples of the removed implant were obtained in 215 cases (79%) and 101 cases (37%), respectively. Histopathological analysis was performed in 250 cases (91%). Patients were classified as having low-grade infections according to institutional criteria and Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2013 criteria. Low-grade infections according to institutional criteria were treated with targeted antibiotics for six weeks postoperatively. Implant failure was defined as the need for re-revision resulting from periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and aseptic reasons. The mean follow-up was 68 months (26 to 95). Results. Unexpected positive intraoperative samples were found in 77 revisions (28%). Low-grade infection was diagnosed in 36 cases (13%) using institutional criteria and in nine cases (3%) using MSIS ICM 2013 criteria. In all, 41 patients (15%) had single specimen growth of a low-virulent pathogen and were deemed contaminated. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and anaerobes were the most commonly isolated bacteria. Implant failure for PJI was higher in revisions with presumed contaminants (5/41, 12%) compared to those with low-grade infections (2/36, 6%) and those with negative samples (5/197, 3%) (p = 0.021). The rate of all-cause re-revision was similar in patients diagnosed with low-grade infections (5/36, 14%) and those with presumed contaminants (6/41, 15%) and negative samples (21/197, 11%) (p = 0.699). Conclusion. Our findings suggest that the presumption of culture contamination in aseptic revision hip arthroplasty may increase the detection of PJI. In this cohort, the presence of low-grade infection did not increase the risk of re-revision. Further studies are needed to assess the relevance of single specimen growth and the benefits of specific postoperative antibiotic regimens. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6):1070–1077

Aim. Treatment algorithms for fracture-related nonunion depend on the presence or absence of bacterial infection. However, the manifestation of septic nonunion varies. Low-grade infections, unlike manifest infections, lack clinical signs of infection and present similarly to aseptic nonunion. The clinical importance of low-grade infection in nonunion is not entirely clear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of low-grade infection in the development and management of femoral or tibial nonunion. Method. A prospective, multicenter clinical study enrolled patients with nonunion and regular healed fractures. Preoperatively, complete blood count without differential, C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin were obtained, clinical signs of infection were recorded, and a suspected septic or aseptic diagnosis was made based on history and clinical examination. During surgical nonunion revision or routine implant removal, tissue samples were collected for microbiology and histopathology, and osteosynthesis material for sonication. Nonunion patients were followed for 12 months. Definitive diagnosis of “septic” or “aseptic” nonunion was made according to diagnostic criteria for fracture-related infection, considering the results of any further revision surgery during follow-up. Results. 34 patients with regular healed fractures were included. 62 nonunion patients were diagnosed as aseptic, 22 with manifest, and 23 with low-grade infection. The positive predictive value was 88% and the negative predictive value 72% for the suspected diagnosis. The nonunion groups had significantly higher CRP levels than the regular healer group. Differentiation between septic and aseptic nonunion based on blood values was not possible. Low-grade infection demonstrated less frequently histopathologic signs of infection than manifest infection (22% vs. 50%, p=0.048), with 15% of regular healers having histopathologic signs of infection. Cutibacterium acnes was less present in manifest compared to low-grade infection (p=0.042). Healing rates for septic nonunion involving C. acnes were significantly lower for manifest infection (20%) than for low-grade infection (100%, p=0.002). Patients with low-grade infection were treated with systemic antibiotics less frequently than patients with manifest infection (p=0.026), with no significant difference in healing rate (83% vs. 64%), which was slightly lower for low-grade infection than for aseptic nonunion (90%). Conclusions. Low-grade infections play a significant role in nonunion development and are difficult to diagnose preoperatively due to the lack of clinical signs of infection and unremarkable blood counts. However, our results imply that for low-grade infections, antibiotic therapy may not always be mandatory to heal the nonunion. This study was supported by the German Social Accident Insurance (FF-FR0276)

Aim. Failed consolidation (nonunion) after foot and ankle arthrodesis is a major complication, which can lead to additional revision arthrodesis with increased risk of morbidity. Multiple factors can contribute to developing a nonunion, including a low-grade infection. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of unsuspected low-grade infection in revision arthrodesis for nonunions after foot and ankle arthrodesis. We also analyzed the outcome of unsuspected low-grade infections. Method. We conducted a retrospective study in The Sint Maartenskliniek, The Netherlands. All patients who underwent revision arthrodesis for assumed aseptic nonunion after foot and ankle arthrodesis between January 2020 and July 2021 were included. Patients were excluded if <5 tissue samples were obtained during revision arthrodesis or if they were treated for infection after the index arthrodesis. For the included patients, at least 5 tissue samples for culture were taken during the revision arthrodesis. The causative microorganisms, antibiotic susceptibility and treatment were assessed. An unsuspected infection was defined as ≥2 positive cultures with phenotypical identical microorganisms. Success was defined as union on imaging during clinical follow-up, without signs of persistent infection after finishing the antibiotic treatment. Results. In total 91 revision arthrodesis due to nonunion were performed. The mean duration between index and revision arthrodesis was 571 days. In 14 patients, an unexpected infection was diagnosed. The most frequent causative bacteria identified were Cutibacterium acnes (n=10) and Staphylococcus spps. (n=5). One infection was caused by a Gram-negative bacilli (Acinetobacter spps.). Two infections were polymicrobial. Of the 14 infections, 12 were treated with antibiotics for 12 weeks, 1 for 6 weeks and 1 was not treated. After one-year follow-up, the success rate was 86% and in one patient re-surgery was performed for a non-infectious reason. Conclusions. In 18% of the revisions for nonunion after foot and ankle arthrodesis, an unexpected low- grade infection was the cause of the nonunion. Nonunion occurring after foot and ankle arthrodesis is a severe complication, leading to additional revision arthrodesis. Low-grade infection should be considered as possible explanation of the nonunion, despite the lack of local inflammatory signs. As 18% of the nonunions were unexpectedly caused by low-grade infection, we strongly recommend obtaining at least 5 tissue samples for culture during revision arthrodesis. The outcome of unexpected infection as cause of nonunion is good, when treated with targeted antibiotics for 12 weeks

Aims. The efficacy of saline irrigation for treatment of implant-associated infections is limited in the presence of porous metallic implants. This study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of antibiotic doped bioceramic (vancomycin/tobramycin-doped polyvinyl alcohol composite (PVA-VAN/TOB-P)) after saline wash in a mouse infection model implanted with titanium cylinders. Methods. Air pouches created in female BalBc mice by subcutaneous injection of air. In the first of two independent studies, pouches were implanted with titanium cylinders (400, 700, and 100 µm pore sizes) and inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus (1 × 10. 3. or 1 × 10. 6. colony-forming units (CFU)/pouch) to establish infection and biofilm formation. Mice were killed after one week for microbiological analysis. In the second study, pouches were implanted with 400 µm titanium cylinders and inoculated with S. aureus (1 × 10. 3. or 1 × 10. 6. CFU/pouch). Four groups were tested: 1) no bacteria; 2) bacteria without saline wash; 3) saline wash only; and 4) saline wash plus PVA-VAN/TOB-P. After seven days, the pouches were opened and washed with saline alone, or had an additional injection of PVA-VAN/TOB-P. Mice were killed 14 days after pouch wash. Results. The first part of the study showed that low-grade infection was more significant in 400 µm cylinders than cylinders with larger pore sizes (p < 0.05). The second part of the study showed that saline wash alone was ineffective in eradicating both low- and high-grade infections. Saline plus PVA-VAN/TOB-P eradicated the titanium cylinder-associated infections, as manifested by negative cultures of the washouts and supported by scanning electron microscopy and histology. Conclusion. Porous titanium cylinders were vulnerable to bacterial infection and biofilm formation that could not be treated by saline irrigation alone. Application of PVA-VAN/TOB-P directly into the surgical site alone or after saline wash represents a feasible approach for prevention and/or treatment of porous implant-related infections. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(11):622–631

Background. Both from experimental studies and the large arthroplasty registries there is evidence that bacteria are more often involved in implant loosening then is currently reported. To further elucidate this potential problem, the current study investigated the hypothesis that many total hip arthroplasty revisions, classified as aseptic, are in fact low-grade infections missed with routine diagnostics. Methods. In 7 Dutch hospitals, 176 patients with the preoperative diagnosis of aseptic loosening of their total hip arthroplasty were enrolled. From each patient, the preoperative history was obtained. During surgery, between 14 and 20 tissue samples were obtained for routine culture, pathology analysis and broad range 16S rRNA PCR with reverse line blot hybridization (PCR-RLB). Samples were taken from the (neo-) capsule and acetabular and femoral interface tissue. Cultures were performed locally according to similar protocols. One specialized pathologist, blinded for all other results, analyzed all pathology samples. The PCR-RLB analysis was performed centrally, using a technique previously validated for orthopedic use. Patients were classified as not infected, suspect for infection or infected, according to strict, predefined criteria. Each patient had a follow-up visit after 1 year. Results. Seven patients were classified as infected, of whom 4 were not identified by routine culture. In these patients, positive PCR-RLB results were supported by pathology analyses suspect for infection as well. An additional 15 patients were suspect for infection as well. The microorganisms identified were low virulent bacteria, like coagulase negative staphylococci and Proprionibacterium acnes, in most cases. Twenty of these 22 patients received a cemented prosthesis, fixated with antibiotic-loaded bone cement. All patients received prophylactic systemic antibiotics, after obtaining the tissue samples. Seven of the 22 patients reported complaints one year post-surgery, only one showing signs of early loosening. However, in none of the patients additional surgery was performed. Discussion. Although percentages were not as high as previously reported in literature, between 4 and 13 percent of patients with the preoperative diagnosis of aseptic loosening were infected. However, as thorough debridement was performed during surgery and prophylactic antibiotics were used, it did not have many clinical consequences, as most patients performed well at the 1-year follow-up. Whether it has implications for long-term implant survival remains to be seen

Aim

The pathogenesis of non-union is multifactorial. Path biological factors, mechanical factors, and low-grade-infection contribute to impaired bone healing. Aim of this study was to determine the rate of low-grade-infection in patients with long bone non-union of the lower extremity without signs of acute infection, the influence of CRP (C-reactive protein), and the outcome.

Pre-operative definitive diagnosis of infection in painful total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not always easy to be established, making the intra-operative decision-making process crucial in management of revision hip surgery. Calprotectin is a promising point-of-care novel biomarker that has displayed high accuracy in detecting PJIs. From November 2020 to December 2022, 105 patients with painful primary THA were treated with revision THA in 3 orthopaedic departments. Pre-operatively, 23 were considered infected and treated with two-stage revision THA. The remaining 82 were likely infected according to the 2019 EBJIS criteria. The suspicion of low-grade infection was based on clinical (rest and/or night pain), laboratory (CRP, ESR, WBC – normal or slightly elevated) and radiological evaluation (loosening). Hip aspiration under CT imaging was performed in these cases and 34 of them yielded positive culture and were treated with two-stage revision. Aspiration was ineffective in the remaining 48 cases (33 negative, 15 unsuccessful attempts). Intra-operatively, calprotectin was measured with lateral flow immunoassay test in these patients. Cases with calprotectin levels ≥ 50 mg/L were treated with 2-stage revision THA; otherwise, they were considered not-infected and one-stage revision was performed. Synovial fluid and tissue samples were collected for analysis. Implants were sent for sonication fluid cultures. Calprotectin was positive (≥ 50 mg/L) in 27 cases and negative in 21 cases. There was 1 false negative case with positive tissue cultures. Out of the 27 positive cases, 25 had positive tissue cultures and sonication. However, 2 cases with high calprotectin levels (>200 mg/L) were not infected. The false positive result was attributed to severe metallosis. Calprotectin sensitivity was 96.2%, specificity 90.9%, PPV 92.6%, NPV 95.2%, AUC 0.935. The results of this ongoing study indicate that calprotectin seems to be a valuable tool in facilitating the intra-operative decision-making process in cases that low-grade infection is suspected and diagnosis cannot be established pre-operatively

The efficacy of saline irrigation for the treatment of periprosthetic infection (PJI) is limited in the presence of infected implants. This study evaluated the efficacy of vancomycin/tobramycin-doped polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/ceramic composites (PVA-VAN/TOB-P) after saline irrigation in a mouse pouch infection model. 3D printed porous titanium (Ti) cylinders (400, 700 and 100 µm in pore size) were implanted into mice pouches, then inoculated with S. aureus at the amounts of 1X10. 3. CFU and 1X10. 6. CFU per pouch, respectively. Mice were randomized into 4 groups (n=6 for each group): (1) no bacteria; (2) bacteria without saline wash; 3) saline wash only, and (4) saline wash+PVA-VAN/TOB-P. After seven days, pouches were washed out alone or with additional injection of 0.2 ml of PVA-VAN/TOB-P. Mice were sacrificed 14 days after pouch wash. Bacteria cultures of collected Ti cylinders and washout fluid and histology of pouch tissues were performed. The low-grade infection (1X10. 3. CFU) was more significant in 400 µm Ti cylinders than that in Ti cylinders with larger pore sizes (700 and 1000 µm (p<0.05). A similar pattern of high-grade infection (1X10. 6. CFU) was observed (p<0.05). For the end wash, the bacteria burden (0.49±0.02) in saline wash group was completely eradicated by the addition of PVA-VAN/TOB-P (0.005±0.001, p<0.05). We noticed that 400 µm Ti cylinders have the highest risk of implant infection. Our data supported that the effect of saline irrigation was very limited in the presence of contaminated porous Ti cylinders. PVA-VAN/TOB-P was biodegradable, biocompatible, and was effective in eradicating bacteria retention after saline irrigation in a mouse model of low grade and high-grade infection. We believe that PVA-VAN/TOB-P represents an alternative to reduce the risk of PJI by providing a sustained local delivery of antibiotics

Aim. The aim of this study was to develop an in-house multiplex PCR real-time assay on the LightCycler 480 system (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) with the aim of rapid detection of common pathogens in prosthetic joint infections (PJI), followed by validation on clinical samples (sonication fluid and tissue biopsies) routinely collected for PJI diagnosis. Methods. Using the PrimerQuest and CLC WorkBench tool, we designed six primer sets with specific fluorescently labelled TaqMan probes for the nuc gene in different Staphylococcus species (S. aureus, S. epidermidis, S. capitis, S. lugdunensis, S. hominis, S. haemolyticus). In addition, primers previously developed by Renz et al. (2022) for C. acnes were integrated into our assay with internal control of isolation, leading to the development of specific mPCR assay with seven included targets. Analytical sensitivity and specificity were evaluated using reference bacterial strains. To determine the assay's limit of detection (LOD), we conducted serial dilutions of eluates containing known concentrations of bacterial DNA copies/µl. The overall LOD in spiked clinical samples, including sample preparation and DNA isolation on MagnaPure24, was measured through 10-fold serial dilutions (from 10. 9. to 10. -1. CFU/ml) including additional dilutions of 5000, 500, 50 and 5 CFU/ml. Results. The results with LOD in serial dilutions of eluates and spiked clinical samples, together with analytical sensitivity and specificity, are shown in Table 1. Conclusion. The mPCR assay showed excellent analytical sensitivity and specificity, but with considerably lower LOD after sample preparation and further DNA isolation in spiked clinical samples. Although still promising in diagnostics of acute infections, the use of mPCR could be challenging in chronic, low-grade infections with lower microbial burden. Nevertheless, PCR offers significant advantages in terms of speed and can shorten the time to result, especially for C. acnes infections. Additionally, it represents a promising complementary approach in patients with suspected PJI on antibiotic therapy with negative culture results. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aim. In 10% of the presumed aseptic hip or knee revisions, a low-grade infection is unexpectedly diagnosed based on the tissue samples taken during revision. Extended antimicrobial prophylaxis can possibly reduce the failure rate in cases of unexpected PJI, because the prophylaxis can be considered as early empiric treatment. In this randomized controlled study we analysed whether extended antimicrobial prophylaxis compared to a single dose is beneficial to improve the outcome of treatment in unexpected PJI in revision arthroplasty. Method. This study was nested in a randomized clinical trial comparing single-dose cefazolin with prolonged prophylaxis (15 doses of cefazolin over 5 days) for revision arthroplasty of the hip or knee. For this analysis, patients were included if an unsuspected PJI (defined as ≥2 positive intraoperative tissue samples with the same microorganism) was diagnosed. PJI treatment consisted of 12 weeks of a rifampicin-based regimen in Staphylococcal PJI, without removal of the prosthesis. We examined Infection characteristics and success of treatment after one year, defined as the absence of signs or treatment for PJI during follow-up. Results. After randomization of 662 patients, 68 unexpected PJI were diagnosed. In 5 cases no antimicrobial treatment was started. The success rate after one year follow-up for those who received PJI treatment was 96% (28/29) in the single dose group and 91% (31/34) in the extended prophylaxis group (p=1.00). The most frequently identified pathogens in unexpected PJI were Cutibacterium acnes (n=50) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (n=14). The causatives were susceptible for the cefazolin prophylaxis in 61 of the 63 cases. The interval between the stopped prophylaxis and the re-start of antimicrobial treatment was on average 10 days (SD 4) for the single dose and 5 days (SD 4) for the extended group. The mean duration of antimicrobial treatment was 83 days (SD 12) and did not differ between both groups (p=0.16). Conclusions. This is the first randomized controlled trial in which extended prophylaxis showed no benefit on the prosthesis survival for patients with an unexpected PJI after assumed aseptic revision of the hip or knee prosthesis. The results imply that extended prophylaxis should not be given as part of early empiric therapy

Aim. We prospectively evaluated four different microbiological tools for diagnostics of prosthetic joint infections (PJI), and assessed their impact on the categorization of infection according to EBJIS guidelines. We compared culture, in-house real-time mPCR for S. aureus, S. lugdunensis, S. hominis, S. epidermidis, S. capitis, S. haemolyticus, C. acnes (mPCR), broad-spectrum PCR (Molzym) with 16S rRNA V3-V4 amplicon Sanger sequencing (16S PCR), and 16S rRNA V3-V4 amplicon next-generation sequencing (16S NGS) on MiSeq (Ilumina). Methods. A total of 341 samples (sonication fluid, tissue biopsy, synovial fluid) were collected from 32 patients with suspected PJI who underwent 56 revision surgeries at the Orthopaedic Centre University Hospital Ljubljana, between 2022 and 2024. Samples were processed using standard protocols for routine culture, followed by DNA isolation using the MagnaPure24 (Roche). All samples were tested with mPCR, and an additional ≥4 samples from each revision (244 in total) were subjected to further metagenomic analysis. Culture results were considered positive if the same microorganism was detected in ≥2 samples, ≥50 CFU/ml were present in the sonication fluid, or ≥1 sample was positive for a more virulent microorganism or if the patient had received antibiotic treatment. Results. Each tool demonstrated high sensitivity for correct EBJIS categorization (100% culture and 16S NGS, 96.88% mPCR and 16S PCR). The highest specificity was observed with mPCR and 16S PCR (87.5%), while culture (79.17%) and NGS (37.5%) showed lower specificity. In 27% (15/56) of revisions, all microbiological tests were negative, although infection was confirmed with histology in one case, and four cases were classified as infection-likely based on clinical signs. In 20% (11/56) of cases, all microbiological tests were positive; in three cases a combination of other EBJIS criteria (without microbiology) categorized the episodes as infection-likely and one as infection-unlikely, emphasizing the importance of microbiological tests in diagnostic criteria. In 43% (24/56) of revisions categorized as infection-unlikely using a combination of other EBJIS criteria, five had positive culture, and three had positive mPCR and 16S PCR. Fifteen (62%) had positive 16S NGS, 12 due to a low number of reads, which may indicate low-grade infection or possible contamination. Conclusion. To date, no test can be established as the ultimate gold standard. The lack of interpretation criteria can result in low specificity of some methods, as the threshold is difficult to determine. A multidisciplinary approach with combination of microbiological tools is still considered the most efficient

Aim. Differentiation of infected (INF) nonunion from aseptic (AS) nonunion is crucial for the choice of intra- and postoperative treatment. Preoperative diagnosis of infected nonunion is challenging, especially in case of low-grade infection lacking clinical signs of infection. Standard blood markers such as C-reactive protein or leucocyte count do not aid in preoperative diagnosis. Proteomic profiling has shown promising results for differentiation of numerous chronic disease states, and in this study was applied to preoperative blood samples of patients with nonunion in an attempt to identify potential biomarkers. Method. This prospective multicenter study enrolled patients undergoing revision surgery of femur or tibia nonunion. Patients with implant removal after regular fracture healing (HEAL) were included as a control-group. Preoperative blood samples, intraoperative tissue samples, sonication of osteosynthesis material and 1-year-follow-up questionnaire were taken. Nonunion patients were grouped into INF or AS after assessing bacterial culture and histopathology of retrieved samples. Diagnosis of infection followed the fracture related infection consensus group criteria, with additional consideration of healing one year after revision surgery. Targeted proteomics was used to investigate a predefined panel of 45 cytokines in preoperative blood samples. Statistical differences were calculated with Kruskal Wallis and Dunn's post hoc test. Cytokines with less than 80% of samples being above the lower limit of detection range (LLDR) were excluded for this study. Results. We recruited 62 AS, 43 INF and 32 HEAL patients. Patients in the two nonunion groups (INF and AS) did not differ concerning smoking, diabetes or initial open or closed fracture. Thirty-two cytokines were above LLDR in >80% of patients. INF patients showed a significant difference in expression of 8 cytokines compared to AS, with greatest differences observed for Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor 1 (MCSF-1) and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) (p<0.01). In comparing AS with HEAL patients, 9 cytokines displayed significant differences, including interleukin (IL)-6, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A (VEGFA), Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 (MMP-1). Comparison of INF with HEAL patients revealed significantly different expression of 20 cytokines, including. IL-6, IL-18, VEGFA or MMP-1. Conclusions. Our study revealed differences in plasma cytokine profile of blood samples from INF and AS patients. Although no single biomarker is sufficient to differentiate these patients preoperatively in isolation, future multivariant analysis of this cytokine data in combination with clinical characteristics may provide valuable diagnostic insights. Funded by German Social Accident Insurance (FF-FR 0276) and AO Trauma (AR2021_04)

Aim. Low-grade infections cannot be easily distinguished from aseptic complications frequently leading to false negative diagnoses and late onset of anti-bacterial therapy. Therefore, there is a great need to establish biomarkers for early detection of low-grade infections. Method. In this study, we focused on the investigation of anti-α-defensin, anti-C3, anti-C5 and anti-C9 as potential biomarkers for infection in a cohort of hip and knee septic revision cases, taking patient characteristics and comorbidities into account. Here we included 78 patients with septic (35) and aseptic (43) (woman:37, men:42, age 50 – 93 years) revision surgeries of hip and knee. CRP serum levels and leucocyte blood values were evaluated. Patient characteristics, including age, number of prior revision surgeries and comorbidities were recorded. Periprosthetic tissue was stained histologically with Hematoxylin/Eosin and immunohistologically with different antibodies. Results. The CRP values were significantly increased in the septic cohort, but no changes were observed in leucocyte count. Interestingly, we found a strong increase in the terminal complement system component C9 (septic: 0.1% ± 0.2% aseptic: 0.01% ± 0.05%, p= 0.0004) in the septic periprosthetic tissue. The predictive value of α-defensin staining was not statistically significant (septic: 0.5% ± 0.7% aseptic: 0.1% ± 0.6%, p= 0.09). Analyzing the synovial fluid of aseptic and septic patients, the presence of C9 in the septic group (1.8 ± 0.4) was not significantly higher compared to the aseptic (1.9 ± 0.7) group. The next step was to investigate the specificity C9 detection using different joint related diseases such as chondrocalcinosis (CC), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and metallosis. The median of C9 staining in the CC group (0 ± 0.0001) was significant lower than the infection group. Similar results have been observed in RA (0.0003 ± 0.2) and the metallosis group (0.0002 ± 0.01). Conclusions. We found a strong predictive value of anti-C9 staining for tissue infection, suggesting that C9 deposition could be a novel biomarker for the identification of periprosthetic joint infections using tissue biopsies

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of low-grade infections in total hip arthroplasty revisions and the clinical outcomes after two-time revision surgery. Retrospective study of total hip arthroplasty revision surgery between January of 2012 and December of 2013. Inclusion criteria: two-time revision surgery, PCR (pre and post-op) white blood cells count and microbiological culture. The diagnosis of low-grade infection was based on the Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons’ (AAOS) guidelines. All patients were evaluated with the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Between this period were revised a total of 79 hips, none of them bilateral, of these fourteen full-filled the inclusion criteria, eight women and six men. The mean time between primary arthroplasty and revision surgery was 4.5 years. The interface was metal-on-polyethilene in thirteen and metal-on-metal in one. All patients had at least three episodes at the urgency department with permanent hip pain in the last six months. Ten have done a course of antibiotics previous to surgery. Intra-articular pus was present in four patients. The agent isolated was S. Aureus in five and S. Epidermidis in two. An elevated PCR and leucocytosis was present in all patients. The mean PCR was 18.1 and leucocytes countage 7600. The HHS was good in four patients, fair in seven patients and poor in three. These three patients with poor had another surgical intervention due to recurrent dislocation. Periprosthetic joint infection is a common complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The incidence is approximately 1% after primary replacement and about 4% revision arthroplasty. As stated by Hanssen successful treatment outcomes require precise assessment of the infecting organism, the immune status of the patient, and the condition of the bone and soft tissues around the joint. With this study we tried to establish a protocol in our service: patient with a THA, interface metal-on-polyethilene, persistent coxalgia and elevated PCR will be diagnosed with low-grade infection, however we need further revision of our experience

Aim. Low-grade infections are difficult to diagnose. As the presence of a chronic infection requires extensive surgical debridement and antibiotic treatment, it is important to diagnose a SII prior to surgery, especially when the hardware is revised. We investigated whether serum inflammatory markers or nuclear imaging can accurately diagnose a chronic spinal instrumentation infection (SII) prior to surgery. Method. All patients who underwent revision spinal surgery after a scoliosis correction between 2017 and 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. The diagnostic accuracy of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), . 18. F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and Technetium-99m-methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) 3-phase bone scintigraphy (TPBS) to diagnose infection were studied. Patients with an acute infection or inadequate culture sampling were excluded. SII was diagnosed if ≥ 2 of the same microorganism(s) were isolated from intra-operative tissue cultures. Results. 31 patients were included. The indication for hardware extraction was pseudoarthrosis in the majority of patients (n = 15). 22 patients (71%) were diagnosed with SII. In all infected cases, Cutibacterium acnes was isolated, including 5 cases with a polymicrobial infection. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV was: 4.5%, 100%, 100% and 30.0% for CRP >10.0 mg/L, 5.5%, 100%, 100% and 29% for ESR > 30 mm/h; 56%, 80%, 83% and 50% for FDG-PET/CT and 50%, 100%, 100% and 20% for TPBS, respectively. Conclusions. The prevalence of SII in patients undergoing revision spinal surgery is high, with Cutibacterium acnes as the main pathogen. No diagnostic tests could be identified that could accurately diagnose or exclude SII prior to surgery. Future studies should aim to find more sensitive diagnostic modalities to detect low-grade inflammation

Aim. Diagnosis and isolation of a causative organism is imperative for successful treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). While there are several diagnostic algorithms using microbiology, serum and synovial markers, the preoperative diagnosis of a low-grade infection remains a challenge, particularly in patients with unsuccessful aspiration. An incisional biopsy may be used in these cases as additional diagnostic tool. In this retrospective study we evaluated microbiological findings, sensitivity, and specificity of open synovial biopsies in cases of inconclusive preoperative diagnostics. Methods. In a retrospective databank analysis (2010–2018), we identified 80 TKAs that underwent an open biopsy because of inconclusive results after applying the CDC Criteria (2010) or the MSIS (2011–2018) for PJI. Infection makers in the serum (C-reactive protein [CRP], leucocytes count and interleukin-6 [IL-6]) and in the synovial aspirate (leucocyte count, percentage of neutrophiles) prior to the biopsy were analyzed. All biopsies were performed by suprapatellar mini-arthrotomy. If a subsequent revision surgery was performed, the isolated organisms in the open biopsy were compared to the results in the revision surgery and sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Serum markers were checked for correlation with a positive result in the open biopsy using Cramer-V and Chi. 2. -Test. Results. A positive result in the open biopsy occurred in 32 cases (40%) while 48 cases (60%) showed no growth of microorganisms. A preoperative elevated serum CRP (≥1mg/dl) showed a significant correlation for a positive biopsy (p=0.04). The odds ratio for a positive biopsy was 2.57 (95% CI 1.02–6.46) with elevated serum CRP. A revision surgery of the TKA with additional tissue sampling was performed in 27 (84%) cases with a positive biopsy and in 32 (67%) cases with a negative biopsy. The intraoperative tissue samples from the revision surgery showed microbial growth in only 52% of cases that were believed to be culture positive from the biopsy results, while positive cultures occurred in 41% of the cases with an initially negative biopsy. Patients with ≥ two cultures of the same microorganism in the biopsy presented a positive result in 73% of their revision surgeries. The open biopsy showed a sensitivity of 48% with a specificity of 62% in our collective if revision surgery was performed. Conclusion. Open biopsy may be considered with inconclusive preoperative serum and synovial fluid diagnostics for PJI, but sensitivity and specificity were rather low in this special collective. Further studies with bigger collectives should be performed to determine potential markers with a higher sensitivity

Aims: Identifying low-grade infection in failed total hip replacements (THR) is an important but often difficult task. Recently, there has been interest in the use of molecular biology techniques as potential sensitive tests for low-grade infection by identifying fragments of bacterial DNA within human tissue. Methods: We investigated the ability of a molecular biology technique known as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to identify low-grade infection during revision of THR considered to have failed from aseptic causes. We analysed 113 specimens of tissue and synovial fluid from 31 THR revised for aseptic loosening and compared them to 105 control specimens taken during 28 primary THR. All cases were performed in laminar flow theatres. No primary or revision specimen had positive microbiological cultures. No revision specimen had histological evidence suggestive of infection. Results: Using PCR, we identified bacterial DNA in 39 of 85 revision THR tissue specimens (46%) compared to 18 of 84 primary THR specimens (21.4%, p=0.001). Bacterial DNA was identified within the synovial fluid in three specimens taken from 28 revision THR (10.7%) and in two specimens taken from 21 primary THR (9.5%, p=0.36). As multiple specimens were sent per case, 16 of 31 revision THR (52%) and eight of 28 primary THR (29%) were considered to be infected (p=0.072). Conclusions: Our results suggest that many aseptically loose revision THR actually contain bacterial DNA within the peri-prosthetic tissue, but infrequently within the synovial fluid. With an overall specimen contamination rate of 19%, however, PCR has poor specificity for routine diagnostic use in revision THR

It has been proposed that intervertebral disc degeneration might be caused by low-grade infection. The purpose of the present study was to assess the incidence of herpes viruses in intervertebral disc specimens from patients with lumbar disc herniation. A polymerase chain reaction based assay was applied to screen for the DNA of eight different herpes viruses in 16 patients and two controls. DNA of at least one herpes virus was detected in 13 specimens (81.25%). Herpes Simplex Virus type-1 (HSV-1) was the most frequently detected virus (56.25%), followed by Cytomegalovirus (CMV) (37.5%). In two patients, co-infection by both HSV-1 and CMV was detected. All samples, including the control specimens, were negative for Herpes Simplex Virus type-2, Varicella Zoster Virus, Epstein Barr Virus, Human Herpes Viruses 6, 7 and 8. The absence of an acute infection was confirmed both at the serological and mRNA level. To our knowledge this is the first unequivocal evidence of the presence of herpes virus DNA in intervertebral disc specimens of patients with lumbar disc herniation suggesting the potential role of herpes viruses as a contributing factor to the pathogenesis of degenerative disc disease

Endoprosthetic reconstruction following resection of 31 tumours of the proximal femur in 30 patients was performed using a Wagner SL femoral revision stem. The mean follow-up was 25.6 months (0.6 to 130.0). Of the 28 patients with a metastasis, 27 died within a mean follow-up period of 18.1 months (0.6 to 56.3) after the operation, and the remaining patient was excluded from the study 44.4 months post-operatively when the stem was removed. The two patients with primary bone tumours were still alive at the latest follow-up of 81.0 and 130.0 months, respectively. One stem only was removed for suspected low-grade infection 44.4 months post-operatively. The worst-case survival rate with removal of the stem for any cause and/or loss to follow-up was 80.0% (95% confidence interval 44.9 to 100) at 130.0 months. The mean Karnofsky index increased from 44.2% (20% to 70%) pre-operatively to 59.7% (0% to 100%) post-operatively, and the mean Merle d’Aubigné score improved from 4.5 (0 to 15) to 12.0 (0 to 18). The mean post-operative Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 62.4% (3.3% to 100%). The Wagner SL femoral revision stem offers an alternative to special tumour prostheses for the treatment of primary and secondary tumours of the proximal femur. The mid-term results are very promising, but long-term experience is necessary

Aim. Diagnosing or excluding a chronic prosthetic joint infection (PJI) prior to revision surgery can be a clinical challenge. To enhance accuracy of diagnosis, several biomarkers were introduced in recent years, but most are either expensive or not available as a rapid test. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of leucocyte esterase (€0.20 per sample), calprotectin (€20 per sample) and alpha defensin (€200 per sample). Method. We prospectively evaluated PJI patients with chronic pain with or without prosthetic loosening between 2017 and 2018. Synovial fluid was collected prior to revision surgery. Leucocyte esterase was measured using a reagent strip (2+ considered as positive), and calprotectin and alpha defensin were measured using a lateral flow immunoassay. Intraoperative cultures (5 periprosthetic tissue samples, synovial fluid and sonication fluid) incubated for 9 days, were used as gold standard. At least two positive cultures of low-grade microorganisms with the same antibiogram were required to diagnose PJI. Results. A total of 19 patients were included (knee =11, hip =8). None of the patients were treated with antibiotics prior to revision surgery. A PJI was diagnosed in 8 patients (42.1%). The diagnostic accuracy of leucocyte esterase vs. calprotectin vs. alpha defensin was as follows; sensitivity 50.0% vs. 87.5% vs. 87.5%, specificity 81.8% vs. 90.9% vs. 100%, positive predictive value 60.0% vs. 87.5% vs. 100% and negative predictive value 75.0% vs. 90.9% vs. 91.6%, respectively. Both calprotectin and alpha defensin were false negative in one PJI caused by Cutibacterium acnes. The other two C. acnes PJIs were correctly diagnosed with both tests. Conclusions. Calprotectin is as accurate as alpha defensin in excluding a chronic PJI at 10% of the costs. Future studies with a large number of patients are necessary to analyze its diagnostic accuracy in very low-grade infections, in particularly caused by C. acnes