In patients where the proximal femur shows gross deformity due
to degenerative changes or fracture, the contralateral femur is
often used to perform preoperative templating for hip arthroplasty.
However, femurs may not be symmetrical: the aim of this study was
to determine the degree of variation between hips in healthy individuals and
to determine whether it is affected by demographic parameters. CT-scan based modelling was used to examine the pelvis and bilateral
femurs of 345 patients (211 males, 134 women; mean age 62 years
(standard deviation (Aims
Materials and Methods
Version of the femoral stem is an important factor
influencing the risk of dislocation after total hip replacement (THR)
as well as the position of the acetabular component. However, there
is no radiological method of measuring stem anteversion described
in the literature. We propose a radiological method to measure stem
version and have assessed its reliability and validity. In 36 patients
who underwent THR, a hip radiograph and CT scan were taken to measure
stem anteversion. The radiograph was a modified Budin view. This
is taken as a posteroanterior radiograph in the sitting position
with 90° hip flexion and 90° knee flexion and 30° hip abduction.
The angle between the stem-neck axis and the posterior intercondylar
line was measured by three independent examiners. The intra- and
interobserver reliabilities of each measurement were examined. The
radiological measurements were compared with the CT measurements
to evaluate their validity. The mean radiological measurement was
13.36° ( Cite this article:
The aim of this retrospective cohort study was
to identify any difference in femoral offset as measured on pre-operative
anteroposterior (AP) radiographs of the pelvis, AP radiographs of
the hip and corresponding CT scans in a consecutive series of 100
patients with primary end-stage osteoarthritis of the hip (43 men
and 57 women with a mean age of 61 years (45 to 74) and a mean body
mass index of 28 kg/m2 (20 to 45)). Patients were positioned according to a standardised protocol
to achieve reproducible projection and all images were calibrated.
Inter- and intra-observer reliability was evaluated and agreement
between methods was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. In the entire cohort, the mean femoral offset was 39.0 mm (95%
confidence interval (CI) 37.4 to 40.6) on radiographs of the pelvis,
44.0 mm (95% CI 42.4 to 45.6) on radiographs of the hip and 44.7
mm (95% CI 43.5 to 45.9) on CT scans. AP radiographs of the pelvis
underestimated femoral offset by 13% when compared with CT (p <
0.001).
No difference in mean femoral offset was seen between AP radiographs
of the hip and CT (p = 0.191). Our results suggest that femoral offset is significantly underestimated
on AP radiographs of the pelvis but can be reliably and accurately
assessed on AP radiographs of the hip in patients with primary end-stage
hip osteoarthritis. We, therefore, recommend that additional AP radiographs of the
hip are obtained routinely for the pre-operative assessment of femoral
offset when templating before total hip replacement.
We examined the morphology of mammalian hips asking whether evolution can explain the morphology of impingement in human hips. We describe two stereotypical mammalian hips, coxa recta and coxa rotunda. Coxa recta is characterised by a straight or aspherical section on the femoral head or head-neck junction. It is a sturdy hip seen mostly in runners and jumpers. Coxa rotunda has a round femoral head with ample head-neck offset, and is seen mostly in climbers and swimmers. Hominid evolution offers an explanation for the variants in hip morphology associated with impingement. The evolutionary conflict between upright gait and the birth of a large-brained fetus is expressed in the female pelvis and hip, and can explain pincer impingement in a coxa profunda. In the male hip, evolution can explain cam impingement in coxa recta as an adaptation for running.
