Introduction. Revision total knee arthroplasy (TKA) has been often used with a metal block augmentation for patients with poor bone quality. However, bone resorption beneath metal block augmentation has been still reported and little information about the reasons of the occurrence of bone resorption is available. The aim of the current study is to identify a possibility of the potential occurrence of bone resorption beneath metal block augmentation, through evaluation of strain distribution beneath metal block augmentation in revision TKA with metal block augmentation, during high deep flexion. Materials and Method. LOSPA, revision TKA with a metal block augmentation (Baseplate size #5, Spacer size #5, Stem size Φ9, L30, Augment #5 T5) was considered in this study. For the test, the tibia component of LOSPA was implanted to the tibia sawbone (left, #3401, Sawbones EuropeAB, Malmö, Sweden), which was corresponded to a traditional TKR surgical guideline. The femoral component of LOSPA was mounted to a customized jig attached to the Instron 8872 (Instron, Norwood, MA, USA), which was designed specially to represent the angles ranged from 0° to 140° with consideration of a rollback of knee joint (Figure. 1). Here, a compressive load of 1,600N (10N/s) was applied for each angle. Strain distribution was then measured from rossete strain gauge (Half Bridge type, CAS, Seoul, Korea) together (Figure 1). Results and Discussions. The strain distribution on the cortical bone of the tibia was shown in Figure 2. The results showed that the strains on the posterior region were gradually increased from extension to high deep of the knee joint and generally larger than the other regions. In contrast to the results on the posterior region, the strains on the medial region were gradually decreased after 60° or 90° flexion position and relatively lower than the other regions. Particularly, the strains on the medial region were generally lower than 50–100 µstrain, which is known as critical value range able to inducing bone resorption, during high deep flexion. This fact indicate that a possibility of the potential bone resorption occurrence in revision TKA used with a metal block augmentation may be relatively increased in patients who are frequently exposed to a personal lifestyle history with the loading conditions of the high flexion. This study may be valuable by identifying for the first time a possibility of the potential bone resorption occurrence through evaluation of the strain distribution beneath metal block augmentation in revision TKA used with a metal block augmentation during high deep flexion. Conclusion. A possibility of the potential bone resorption occurrence in revision TKA used with a metal block augmentation may be dependent on loading patterns applied on the knee joint related to personal lifestyle history. Particularly, it may be relatively increased in patients who are frequently exposed to a personal lifestyle history with the loading conditions of the high flexion. Acknowledgements. This study was supported by a grant from the New Technology Product Evaluation Technical Research project, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS), Republic of Korea

Introduction. Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been often used with a metal block augmentation for patients with poor bone quality. However, bone defects are frequently detected in revision TKA used with metal block augmentation. This study focused on identification of a potential possibility of the bone defect occurrence through the evaluation of the strain distribution on the cortical bone of the tibia implanted revision TKA with metal block augmentation, during high deep flexion. Materials and Methods. Composite tibia finite element (FE) model was developed and revision TKA FE model with a metal block augmentation (Baseplate size #5 44AP/67ML, Spacer size #5 44AP/67ML, Stem size Φ9, L30, Augment #5 44AP/67ML thickness 5mm) was integrated with the composite tibia FE model. 0°, 30° 60°, 90°, 120° and 140° flexion positions were then considered with femoral rollback phenomenon [Fig 1.A]. A compressive load of 1,600N through the femoral component was applied to the composite tibia FE model integrated with the tibia component, sharing by the medial and lateral condyles, simulating a stance phase before toe-off [Fig 1.B]. Results and Discussions. The strain distribution on the cortical bone of the tibia was shown in [Fig 2]. The results showed that the strains on the posterior region were gradually increased from extension to high deep of the knee joint and generally larger than the other regions. This fact was favorably corresponded to the femoral rollback phenomenon in the knee joint, showing a good accuracy of our FE model. In contrast to the results on the posterior region, the strains on the medial region were gradually decreased after 60° or 90° flexion position and relatively lower than the other regions. Particularly, the strains on the medial region were generally lower than 50–100 µstrain, which is known as critical value range able to inducing bone loss, during high deep flexion. This fact indicate that a potential possibility of bone defect occurrence in revision TKA used with a metal block augmentation may be relatively increased in patients who are frequently exposed to a personal lifestyle history with the loading conditions of the high flexion. This study may be valuable by identifying for the first time a potential possibility of the bone defect occurrence through evaluation of the strain distribution beneath metal block augmentation in revision TKA used with a metal block augmentation during high deep flexion. Conclusions. A potential possibility of bone defect occurrence in revision TKA used with a metal block augmentation may be dependent on loading patterns applied on the knee joint related to personal lifestyle history. Particularly, it may be relatively increased in patients who are frequently exposed to a personal lifestyle history with the loading conditions of the high flexion. Acknowledgements. This study was supported by a grant from the New Technology Product Evaluation Technical Research project, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS), Republic of Korea

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid-term clinical and radiological results in patients who were managed by double metal augmentations in proximal tibial uncontained bony defects undergoing primary or revision total knee arthroplasty. Materials and Methods. We performed double metal augmentations in proximal tibial uncontained bony defects undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Out of total 14 patients, 8 patients (4 priamry arthroplasty, 4 revision arthroplasty), mean 61.3 (50–80) years, were available for review at least 5 years follow up. The average follow up period was 86.3(60–99) months. Range of motion, American Knee Society Score were evaluated pre- and postoperatively as a clinical values. Another clinical assessments undertaken at the final reviews, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), Oxford knee score (OKS), Short Form-36 (SF-36), Lower extremity functional scale (LEFS), and Lower extremity activity scale (LEAS) were checked. Radiological results, involving presence of radiolucent lines (RLLs) > 1mm in width, and osteolysis at the block-cement-bone interface were taken under fluoroscopic images at postoperatively and annually thereafter. Results. At the final follow-up, range of motion was increased from 97.5° to 121.3° and American Knee society score was significantly improved from 30.4 to 92.6 (p=0.03) and functional score from 43.1 to 86.9 (p=0.03). At the final follow-up, average WOMAC score was 10(2–20), OKS was 40.5(33–47), LEFS was 55.8(34–75), and LEAS was 10.9(7–15). There was no broken or deterioration sign at between first and second metal block at radiographically. RLLs at the block-cement-bone interfaces under fluoroscopic images were examined in 3 knees, but didn't cause any failure sign such as osteolysis, or collapse, or instability at final reviews. Conclusions. The clinical and radiological evaluations showed that the double metal augmentations is a favorable and useful way to manage severe uncontained proximal tibial bony defects at least 5 years mid-term follow up period. Preoperative standing anteroposterior (AP) radiograph (Fig 1) shows severe uncontained proximal tibial bone defects, approximately 23 mm compared with unaffected lateral tibial condyle. AP view of fluoroscopy with medial double metal blocks (10 mm block + down sized 10 mm block) combined intramedullary stem at 60-month follow-up after primary total knee arthroplasty, demonstrating radiolucent line (white arrow) of 2.5 mm width bottom the block (Fig 2). AP view at 92-month follow-up indicating non-progressive stable radiolucent lines (white arrow) at same area without any radiographic failure signs and broken sign between first and second metal block (Fig 3)

Introduction. Various methods to manage medial tibial defects in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been described. According to Vail TP, metal augmentation is usually indicated for defect depth of >10 mm of the medial tibial plateau. The outcomes of metal augmentation have been described as excellent. Nevertheless, we believe that it is mandatory to preserve as much of the bone as possible for future revision surgeries. Therefore, we performed autologous impaction bone grafting even for large bone defects (defect depth of ≥10 mm) in primary TKA. The objectives of this study are to describe our bone grafting technique in detail and to assess the radiological outcomes of the grafted bone. Methods. Between 2003 and 2011, 26 TKAs with autologous impaction bone grafting for ≥10 mm medial tibial defects were performed. The preoperative diagnoses were osteoarthritis in 17 knees, rheumatoid arthritis in 2 knees, osteonecrosis of the medial tibial condyle in 6 knees, and Charcot's joint in 1 knee. The average mediolateral width and depth of the medial tibial defects, measured after the horizontal osteotomy of the tibial articular surface, were 17.8 mm (range, 10–25 mm) and 12.0 mm (range, 10–23 mm), respectively. The average patient age at surgery was 73.2 years (range, 56–85 years). The patients were followed up for an average of 55 months (range 27–109 months). Bone grafting technique: Multiple drill holes (white arrow) were made on the floor of the defect (A) and a morselized cancellous bone was impacted using the grip end of a metal hammer (white asterisk) and firm manual pressure to fill the defect. Thus, the firm impaction prevented bone cement from entering the space between the graft and the tibial host bed. An assistant's index finger (black asterisk) was used as a bank (B). The tibial component was fixed on the grafted bone (white asterisk) with bone cement (C). Internal fixation devices were not required, and stem extension was used in only Charcot's joint (defect depth=23 mm). Aftertreatment was the same as that for the usual TKAs without bone defects. Results. In terms of clinical outcomes, no patient showed disturbances in walking ability at final follow-up. The average knee flexion angle was 114° (range, 95°–130°). The grafted bone was kept at the grafted area on the radiograms throughout the follow-up period. No absorption or collapse of the grafted bone was observed on the radiograms at the final follow-up. Usually, the grafted bone showed osteosclerotic changes around 2–3 months after TKA. Then, the osteosclerosis became weakened and the bony trabeculae could be detected in the grafted area. Finally, the grafted bone completely incorporated into the host bone in all knees with evidence of bony trabeculae crossing the interface by up to 1 year after surgery. The margin of the grafted area resembled bony cortex in 19 TKAs (73.1%). Conclusions. Our technique is easy, economic, and reproducible. It is an acceptable alternative to metal augmentation for large medial tibial defects in primary TKA

The major causes of revision total knee are associated with some degree of bone loss. The missing bone must be accounted for to insure success of the revision procedure, to achieve flexion extension balance, restore the joint line to within a centimeter of its previous level, and to assure a proper sizing especially the anteroposterior diameter of the femoral component. In recent years, clinical practice has evolved over time with a general move away from a structural graft with an increase in utilisation of metal augments. Alternatives include cement with or without screw fixation, rarely, with the most common option being the use of metal wedges. With the recent availability of highly porous augments, the role of metal augmentation has increased. Bone graft is now predominantly used in particulate form for contained defects with more limited use of structural graft. The role of the allograft-prosthetic composite has become more limited. For the elderly with osteopenia and massive bone loss, complete metal substitution with an oncology prosthesis has become more common. The degree of bone loss is a major determinant of the management strategy. For contained defects less than 5 mm, cement alone, with or without screw supplementation, may be adequate. For greater than 5 mm, morselised graft is frequently used. For uncontained defects of up to 15 mm or more, metal augmentation is the first choice. Bone graft techniques can be utilised in this setting, however, these are more time consuming and technically demanding with little demonstrated advantage. For larger, uncontained defects, newer generation highly porous augments and step wedges are useful. Large contained defects can be dealt with utilising impaction grafting, similar to the hip impaction grafting technique. Massive distal defects are expeditiously managed with oncology defects in the case of periprosthetic fracture and/or massive osteolysis particularly when combined with osteopenia in an elderly, low demand patient. Surgeons must be familiar with an array of techniques in order to effectively deal with the wide spectrum of bone defects encountered during revision total knee arthroplasty

Severe glenoid bone loss in patients with osteoarthritis with intact rotator cuff is associated with posterior glenoid bone loss and posterior humeral subluxation. Management of severe glenoid bone loss during shoulder arthroplasty is controversial and technically challenging and options range from humeral hemiarthroplasty, anatomic shoulder replacement with glenoid bone grafting or augmented glenoid component implantation, to reverse replacement with reaming to correct version or structural bone grafting or metallic augmentation of the bone deficiency. Shoulder replacement with severe glenoid bone loss is technically challenging and characterised by higher rates of complications and revisions. Hemiarthroplasty has limited benefit for pain relief and function especially if eccentric glenoid wear exists. Bone loss with >15 degrees of retroversion likely requires version correction include bone-grafting, augmented glenoid components, or reverse total shoulder replacement. Asymmetric reaming may improve version but is limited to 15 degrees of version correction in order to preserve subchondral bone and glenoid bone vault depth. Bone-grafting of glenoid wear and defects has had mixed results with graft-related complications, periprosthetic radiolucent lines, and glenoid component failure of fixation. Implantation of an augmented wedge or step polyethylene glenoid component improves joint version while preserving subchondral bone, but is technically demanding and with minimal short term clinical follow-up. A Mayo study demonstrated roughly 50% of patients with posteriorly augmented polyethylene had radiolucent lines and 1/3 had posterior subluxation. Another wedge polyethylene design had 66% with bone ingrowth around polyethylene fins at 3 years. Long term outcomes are unknown for these new wedge augmented glenoid components. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty avoids many risks of anatomic replacement glenoid component fixation and stability but is associated with a high complication rate (15%) including neurologic and baseplate loosening and often requires structural bone grafting behind the baseplate with suboptimal outcomes or metallic augmented baseplates with limited evidence and short term outcomes. Reverse replacement with baseplate bone grafting or metal augmentation is technically challenging due to limited native glenoid bone stock available for baseplate component ingrowth and long term fixation. Failure to correct glenoid superior inclination and restore neutral version within 10 degrees increases the risks of reverse baseplate failure of fixation, pull out, and failure of reverse replacement. Reverse baseplate failure rates in patients with severe glenoid bone loss and concomitant glenoid bone grafting range from 5–11%. The minimum native glenoid bony contact with the baseplate is unknown but likely is approximately 1cm of native bone contacting a central ingrowth post and a minority (∼15–25%) of native glenoid contacting the backside of the baseplate. Failure to correct posterior bone loss can lead to retroversion of the baseplate, reduced external rotation, posterior scapular notching, and posteromedial polyethylene wear. In summary, shoulder replacement with severe glenoid bone loss is technically challenging and characterised by higher rates of complication and revision

Purpose. Most of revision TKA needs bone reconstruction. The success of revision TKA depends on how well the bone reconstruction can be done. The method of reconstruction includes bone cementing, metal augmentation, allogenic bone graft, APC and tumor prosthesis, etc. In moderate to severe bone defect, allograft is needed. However, allogenic bone graft is surgically demanding and needs long operation time, which is very risky to the elderly patients. The authors revised an alternative method of bone defect reconstruction using cementing method with multiple screws augmentation. Methods. There were 12 cases of patients with large defect which could not be reconstructed with metal augment from April 2012 to April 2014. The authors performed 3 to 5 screws fixation on the defect site. Sclerotic bone is prepared with burring for better cementing. 3 ∼ 5 screws according to the size of defect. The length of screw fixation was determined as deep to the bone until stable fixation just beneath the implant. When drilling for the screw insertion, intramedullary guide is put into the medullary canal so as not to interfere with implant insertion. The defect is filled with cement during prosthesis fixation. Weight bearing was permitted on postoperative 3rd day, as usual manner of primary TKA. Results. According to the AORI classification, there were 10 cases of 2A and 2 cases of 2B. Mean follow up period was average 15 months. The number of screw insertion was 4.3 ea (2∼8). Average operation time was 1 hour and 57 minutes. Mean ROM was 107.9. HSS score, KSS score ad WOMAC score were 86.3, 92.8 and 11, respectively. There were no case of infection and loosening at the last follow-up. Conclusion. Cementing with multiple screws augmentation technique is a good alternative of bone reconstruction

Introduction. The optimal management of severe tibial and/or femoral bone loss in a revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not been established. Reconstructive methods include structural or bulk allografts, impaction bone-grafting with or without mesh augmentation, custum prosthetic components, modular metal augmentations of prosthesis and tumor prosthesis. Recently metaphyseal fixation using porous tantalum cones (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) has been proposed as alternative strategy for severe bone loss. Objectives. The purposes of this study were to determine the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients who underwent revision knee arthroplasty with tantalum cones with a minimum of 5-year follow-up. Methods. From November 2005 to August 2008 a total of 26 porous tantalum metaphyseal cones were used to reconstruct severe tibial and/or femoral bone loss in 18 patients during revision TKA at a single institution. There were 12 females and 6 males with an average age of 73 years (range 55–84) at the time of revision. The mean clinical and radiographic follow-up was 6.3 years (range, 5–8). The reasons for revision were aseptic loosening (5 cases) and deep infection (13 cases). A Two stage procedure was used in all septic cases. According to the Anderson Orthopaedic Reseach Institute (AORI) bone defects classification all femoral and tibial defects were rated 2B and 3 (3 T2b, 9 T3, 3 F2b and 10 F3). A femoral cone was inserted in 6 patients, a tibial cone was inserted in 5, a double cone in 6 (femoral and tibial), and a triple cone in 1 (1 femoral and 2 tibial). A constrained condylar implant (LCCK, Zimmer, Warsaw) was inserted in 6 patients and a rotating hinge knee implants (RHK, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) in 12 pateints. All patients were prospectively followed for clinical and radiographic evaluation preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, 6 months, one year and yearly thereafter. Results. Knee Society knee scores improved from a mean of 31.3 points before surgery to 76.7 points at latest followup (p < 0.001). Knee Society function scores improved from a mean of 21.7 points before surgery to 65.4 points at latest followup (p < 0.001). The average flexion contracture was 6° and the average flection was 88°. At the time of the latest follow-up the average flexion contraction was 3° and the average flexion was 105°. No radiolucent lines were seen between the cones and the adjacent tibial and femoral bone at the latest follow-up. There was no evidence of loosening or migration of any implant at the time of the final follow-up. There have been two reoperations for recurrent infection (11%). Conclusions. Our experience demonstrates excellent clinical and radiographic mid-term outcomes and confirms that metaphyseal fixation with porous tantalum cones can be achieved. Long-term follow up and comparative studies are necessary

Pelvic discontinuity remains one of the most difficult reconstructive challenges during acetabular revision. Bony defects are extremely variable and remaining bone quality may be extremely poor. Careful pre-operative imaging with plain radiographs, oblique views, and CT scanning is recommended to improve understanding of the remaining bone stock. It is wise to have several options available intra-operatively including metal augments, jumbo cups, and cages. Various treatment options have been used with variable success. The principles of management include restoration of acetabular stability by “connecting” the ilium to the ischium, and by (hopefully) allowing some bony ingrowth into a porous surface to allow longer-term construct stability. Posterior column plates can be useful to stabilise the pelvis, and can supplement a trabecular metal uncemented acetabular component. Screws into the dome and into the ischium are used to span the discontinuity. More severe defects may require so-called “cup-cage” constructs or trabecular metal augmentation distraction techniques. The most severe defects typically necessitate custom triflange components. Triflange constructs allow broad based contact with remaining bone stock, and can span surprisingly large defects. Recent cost analyses have shown that custom triflange constructs are comparable to cup-cage-augment reconstructions. The results of these various solutions to manage pelvic discontinuity is extremely variable, however, it is fair to conclude that constructs that allow some bony ingrowth have demonstrated improved survivorship when compared to historical treatments such as bulk allografts protected by cages. The author prefers a posterior column plate and a trabecular metal cup for simple discontinuities, a cup-cage for larger defects, and a custom triflange for the most severe defects. Pre-operative imaging is critical to guide this decision-making, and careful attention to detail is important to obtain a stable, durable construct