Background. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgical techniques attempt to achieve equal flexion and extension gaps to produce a well-balanced knee, but unexplainable unhappy patients persist. Mid-flexion instability is one proposed cause of unhappy patients. There are multiple techniques to achieve equal flexion and extension gaps, but their effects in mid-flexion are largely unknown. Purpose of study. The purpose of the study is to determine the effects that changing femur implant size and/or adjusting the femur and tibia proximal -distal and femur anterior-posterior implant positions have on cruciate retaining (CR) TKA mid-flexion ligament balance when equal flexion and extension gaps are maintained. Methods. A computational analysis was performed simulating knee flexion of two CR TKA designs (JOURNEY II CR and LEGION HFCR; Smith & Nephew) using previously validated software (LifeMOD/KneeSim; LifeModeler). Deviations from the ideal implant position were simulated by adjusting tibiofemoral proximal-distal position and femur anterior-posterior position and size (Table 1). Positioning the femur more proximal was accompanied by equal anterior femur and proximal tibia shifts to maintain equal flexion and extension gaps. The forces in ligaments connecting the femur and tibia, which included superficial and posterior MCL, LCL, popliteal-fibular ligament complex, iliotibial band, and anterior-lateral and posterior-medial PCL, were collected. Total tibiofemoral ligament load and PCL load for 15–75° knee flexion were analyzed versus proximal-distal implant position, implant size, implant design, and knee flexion using a MANOVA in Minitab 16 (Minitab). Results. Total tibiofemoral ligament load was significantly reduced by a more proximal implant position (p<.001) (Figure 1) but was not affected by implant size (p>0.6). PCL load was not affected by implant proximal-distal position or size (p>0.9) (Figure 2). Therefore, the PCL did not contribute to changes in mid-flexion balance caused by proximal-distal implant position. Implant design and knee flexion significantly influenced total tibiofemoral ligament and PCL loads (p<.05), but the interactions with implant proximal-distal position and size were not significant (p>0.7) indicating that the effects of implant proximal-distal position applies across the studied implant designs and 15°–75° knee flexion range. Conclusions. Our results suggest that a CR TKA can be well balanced at 0° and 90° knee flexion and be too tight or loose in mid-flexion. Since placement of implant was the variable studied, when the knee is too tight in mid-flexion, our recommendation to loosen the knee is to resect more distal and posterior femur, downsizing if necessary, and increase the tibial insert thickness. The opposite could be done to guard against the knee being too loose in mid-flexion. Finally, it is recommended to gauge balance in more than simply 0° and 90° to determine overall knee balance

Introduction. Mid-flexion stability after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is dependent, in large part, on implant design. Design variables include retention or sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament, conformity of the polyethylene tibial surface, and radius of curvature of the femoral component. In this study, we attempted to isolate the impact of femoral component design by comparing a single-radius design (SR) to a J-Curve design (JC). We selected cruciate-retaining implants to eliminate the effect of a cam-and-post mechanism. Mid-flexion performance these two designs were compared using the Lower-Quarter Y-Balance Test (YBT-LQ), as well as patient reported outcomes and measures of physical performance. The YBT-LQ is a simple functional test of unilateral lower extremity strength and balance. Reach of the contralateral limb is measured in three different directions (Figures 1–3). Our hypothesis was that the SR design would provide superior mid-flexion stability, and therefore, a greater reach distance in the YBT-LQ when compared to the JC group. Methods. Patients undergoing primary, unilateral TKA were prospectively enrolled and block randomized to receive either the SR (n=30) or JC (n=30) implant. All surgeries were performed by one surgeon using a gap-balancing technique with a cruciate-retaining implant design. Patients completed outcome measures (KOOS, KSS, UCLA Activity), performed the YBT-LQ, and completed physical performance measures (walking speed, timed up-and-go, sit-to-stand) before surgery and 1 year postoperatively. A series of 2×2 repeated measures ANOVAS (Implant group x Time) were completed. Results. One year post-operatively, 40 patients (20 SR, 20 JC) were available for analysis. The groups were closely matched for age, gender, BMI, and ASA score. No significant differences existed between implant groups for the YBT-LQ or any other variable of interest. Significant improvements in both implant groups were observed for all variables of interest when comparing pre-operative to one year post-operative. Conclusions. Both groups improved significantly across time in all measures, but no differences were seen between SR and JC designs. Based on reach distances achieved, it is probable that many patients were not able to achieve mid-flexion during the YBT-LQ test. With regards to mid-flexion function after TKA, the significant limitations in strength and balance in this cohort of patients likely outweigh any subtle differences in implant design. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Introduction. The aim of this study was to quantify mid-flexion laxity in a total knee arthroplasty with an elevated joint line, as compared to a native knee and a TKA with joint line maintained. Our hypothesis was joint line elevation of 4mm would increase coronal plane laxity throughout mid-flexion in a pattern distinct from the preoperative knee or in a TKA with native joint line. Methods. Six fresh-frozen cadaver legs from hip-to-toe underwent TKA with a posterior stabilised implant (APEX PS, OMNIlife Science, Inc.) using a computer navigation system equipped with a robotic cutting-guide, in this controlled laboratory cadaveric study. After the initial tibial and femoral resections were performed, the flexion and extension gaps were balanced using navigation, and a 4mm recut was made in the distal femur. The remaining femoral cuts were made, the femoral component was downsized by resecting an additional 4mm of bone off the posterior condyles, and the polyethylene was increased by 4mm to create a situation of a well-balanced knee with an elevated joint line. The navigation system was used to measure overall coronal plane laxity by measuring the mechanical alignment angle at maximum extension, 30, 45, 60 and 90(of flexion, when applying a standardised varus/valgus load of 9.8Nm across the knee using a 4kg spring-load located at 25cm distal to the knee joint line. Laxity was also measured in the native knee, as well as the native knee after a standard approach during TKA which included a medial release. Coronal plane laxity was defined as the absolute difference (in degrees) between the mean mechanical alignment angle obtained from applying a standardised varus and valgus stress at 0, 30, 45, 60 and 90(. Results. In full extension, 30(, 45(, 60(, and 90(of flexion, the native knee showed coronal plane laxity of 2.4, 6.5, 7.0, 7.8, and 9.5(, respectively. The above soft tissue releases produced increased laxity in extension and 30(of flexion. After TKA, the mean coronal plane motion was decreased at all flexion angles and remained consistent throughout arc of motion. With 4mm of joint line elevation, coronal-plane laxity increased by a mean of 1.4° at 30° of flexion (p=.0.0103), 1.5° at 45° of flexion (p=.0.0001), and 1.3° at 60° of flexion (p=0.0018) compared to the TKA with native joint line. Conversely, there was no difference in laxity at 0° and 90° between the initial TKA and after 4mm joint line elevation. Conclusions. The computer navigated, well balanced TKA with a maintained joint line showed consistent coronal plane laxity throughout all flexion angles, while the native knee showed greater laxity at 90° than in mid-flexion. Further, as suggested by retrospective clinical reports, this cadaver study confirms that joint line elevation of only 4mm results in greater coronal plane laxity in mid-flexion. These finding suggest that maintaining the joint line in TKA is necessary to avoid increased mid-flexion, coronal plane laxity

Introduction. Surgeons commonly resect additional distal femur during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to correct a flexion contracture to restore range of motion and knee function. However, the effect of joint line elevation on the resulting TKA kinematics including frontal plane laxity is unclear. Thus, our goal was to quantify the effect of additional distal femoral resection on passive extension and mid-flexion laxity. Methods. Six computational knee models with capsular and collateral ligament properties specific to TKA were developed and implanted with a contemporary posterior-stabilized TKA. A 10° flexion contracture was modeled by imposing capsular contracture as determined by simulating a common clinical exam of knee extension and accounting for the length and weight of each limb segment from which the models were derived (Figure 1). Distal femoral resections of 2 mm and 4 mm were simulated for each model. The knees were then extended by applying the measured knee moments to quantify the amount of knee extension. The output data were compared with a previous cadaveric study using a two-sample two-tailed t-test (p<0.05) [1]. Subsequently, varus and valgus torques of ±10 Nm were applied as the knee was flexed from 0° to 90° at the baseline, and after distal resections of 2 mm, and 4 mm. Coronal laxity, defined as the sum of varus and valgus angulation in response to the applied varus and valgus torques, was measured at 30° and 45°of flexion, and the flexion angle was identified where the increase in laxity was the greatest with respect to baseline. Results. With 2 mm and 4 mm of distal femoral resection, the knee extended an additional 4°±0.5° and 8°±0.75°, respectively (Figure 2). No significant difference was found between the extension angle predicted by the six models and the results of the cadaveric study after 2 mm (p= 0.71) and 4 mm (p= 0.47). At 2 mm resection, mean coronal laxity increased by 3.1° and 2.7° at 30° and 45°of flexion, respectively. At 4 mm resection, mean coronal laxity increased by 6.5° and 5.5° at 30° and 45° of flexion, respectively (Figures 3a and 3b). The flexion angle corresponding to the greatest increase in coronal laxity for 2 mm of distal resection occurred at 22±7° of flexion with a mean increase in laxity of 4.0° from baseline. For 4 mm distal resection, the greatest increase in coronal laxity occurred at 16±6° of flexion with a mean increase in laxity of 7.8° from baseline. Conclusion. A TKA computational model representing a knee with preoperative flexion contracture was developed and corroborated measures from a previous cadaveric study [1]. While additional distal femoral resection in primary TKA increases passive knee extension, the consequent joint line elevation induced up to 8° of additional coronal laxity in mid-flexion. This additional midflexion laxity could contribute to midflexion instability; a condition that may require TKA revision surgery. Further studies are warranted to understand the relationship between joint line elevation, midflexion laxity, and instability. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

The elevation of the joint line is considered a possible cause of mid-flexion instability in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The authors evaluated the effects of joint line change on mid-flexion stability in cruciate retaining TKA. Seventy-nine knees treated by cruciate retaining TKA using a modified balanced gap technique were included in this prospective study. After prosthesis insertion, valgus and varus stabilities were measured under valgus and varus stress using a navigation system at 0, 30, 60 and 90° of knee flexion. Changes of joint lines were measured preoperatively and postoperatively and compared. The knees were allocated to a “No change group (≤4mm, 62 patients)” or to an “Elevation group (>4mm, 17 patients)”. Medio-lateral stabilities (defined as the sums of valgus and varus stabilities measured intra-operatively) were compared in the two groups. The mean joint line elevation was 4.6mm in the no change group and 1.7mm in the elevation group. Mean medio-lateral stability at 30° of knee flexion was 4.8±2.3 mm in the no change group and 6.3±2.7 mm in the elevation group, and these values were significantly different (p = 0.02). However, no significant differences in medio-lateral stability were observed at other flexion angles (p>0.05). Knees with a < 5mm joint line elevation provide better mid-flexion stability after TKA. The results of this study suggest that a < 5mm elevation in joint line laxity is acceptable for cruciate retaining TKA

Functional joint stability and accurate component alignment are crucial for a successful clinical outcome after TKA. However, there are few methods to evaluate joint stability during TKA surgery. Activities of daily living often cause mechanical load to the knee joint not only in full extension but also in mid-flexion. Computer navigation systems are useful for intra-operative monitoring of joint positioning and movements. The purpose of this study was to compare the varus-valgus stability between knees treated with cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA at different angles in the range of motion (ROM) especially in mid-flexion, using the navigation technique. Thirty two knees that underwent TKA with computer navigation technology (precisionN Knee Navigation Software version 4.0, Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI) were evaluated (CR:16; PS:16). The investigator gently applied physiologically allowable maximal manual varus-valgus stress to the knee without angular acceleration, while moving the leg from full extension to flexion, and the mechanical femoral-tibial angle was measured automatically by the navigation system at every 10 degrees throughout the ROM. This measurement cycle was repeated for 3 to 4 times, and maximal varus-valgus laxity was determined as the sum of varus and valgus stress angles for each of the predetermined knee flexion angles. The results of the navigated measurements were used to evaluate varus-valgus instability throughout the ROM and the differences in varus-valgus laxity between pre-TKA (Prior to bone cutting, after navigation registration and suturing of the joint capsule) and post-TKA(After confirming that the TKA components and inserts were firmly placed in an appropriate position, the surgical incision was completely closed). The differences in varus-valgus laxity between the CR and PS groups were compared using the Student's t-test. The knees examined showed the greatest preoperative laxity at 20 to 40 degrees of flexion, with no statistically significant difference between the CR and PS groups (See Figure 1). However, postoperative assessment revealed that PS knees had more varus-valgus laxity than CR knees at all ROM angles examined, and the differences were statistically significant in the flexion range of 10 to 70 degrees (See Figure.2). The differences between preoperative and postoperative joint laxity were analyzed separately for the CR and PS groups. After CR-TKA, joint laxity decreased across all degrees of knee flexion. The differences between preoperative and postoperative joint laxity were statistically significant for the flexion range of 110 to 120 degrees (See Figure.3). On the other hand, knees treated with PS-TKA showed an increase in joint laxity for the flexion range of 10 to 90 degrees. The differences between the preoperative and postoperative values were statistically significant for the flexion range of 10 to 20 degrees in PS-TKA (See Figure.4). We successfully evaluated varus-valgus laxity in this study using a navigation system. The results showed that PS knees had greater varus-valgus laxity than CR knees throughout the ROM, and the differences were statistically significant for the flexion range of 10 to 70 degrees. Altogether, we conclude that PS knees have more mid-flexion laxity than CR knees

Introduction. The aim of this study was to quantitatively analyze the amount coronal plane laxity in mid-flexion that occurs with a loose extension gap in TKA. In the setting of a loose extension gap, we hypothesized that although full extension is achieved, a loose extension gap will ultimately lead to increased varus and/or valgus laxity throughout mid flexion. Methods. After obtaining IRB approval, six fresh-frozen cadaver legs from hip-to-toe underwent TKA with a posterior stabilized implant (APEX PS OMNIlife Science, Inc.) using a computer navigation system equipped with a robotic cutting-guide, in this controlled laboratory cadaveric study. After the initial tibial and femoral resections were performed, and the flexion and extension gaps were balanced using navigation, a 4 mm distal recut was made in the distal femur to create a loose extension gap (using the same thickness of polyethylene as the well-balanced case). Real implants were used in the study to eliminate error in any laxity inherent to the trials. The navigation system was used to measure overall coronal plane laxity by measuring the mechanical alignment angle at maximum extension, 30, 45, 60 and 90 degrees of flexion, when applying a standardized varus/valgus load of 9.8 [Nm] across the knee using a 4 kg spring-load located at 25 cm distal to the knee joint line. (Figure 1). Coronal plane laxity was defined as the absolute difference (in degrees) between the mean mechanical alignment angle obtained from applying a standardized varus and valgus stress at 0, 30, 45, 60 and 90 degrees. Each measurement was performed three separate times. Two tailed student t-tests were performed to analyze whether there was difference in the mean mechanical alignment angle at 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° between the well balanced scenario and following a 4 mm recut in the distal femur creating a loose extension gap. Results. In the setting of a loose extension gap (4 mm distal recut), overall coronal-plane laxity was increased by a mean of 3.6° at 30° of flexion, 3.4° at 45° of flexion, and 2.8° at 60° of flexion (p < 0.05 for each flexion angle). (Figure 2) However, there was no difference in coronal plane laxity between the well-balanced TKA and the TKA with a loose extension gap at 0° and 90° of flexion, when applying a standardized varus and valgus load. Conclusions. Using a reliable, accurate, and reproducible method of measuring coronal plane laxity, we have shown that in the setting of a loose extension gap during total knee arthroplasty, coronal plane laxity will be significantly higher in mid-flexion compared to the well balanced state

Introduction. The aim of this study was to quantitatively analyze the amount coronal plane laxity in mid-flexion that occurs in a well-balanced knee with an elevated joint line of 4 mm. In the setting an elevated joint line, we hypothesized that we would observe an increased varus and/or valgus laxity throughout mid flexion. Methods. After obtaining IRB approval, nine fresh-frozen cadaver legs from hip-to-toe underwent TKA with a posterior stabilized implant (APEX PS, OMNIlife Science, Inc.) using a computer navigation system equipped with a robotic cutting-guide, in this controlled laboratory cadaveric study. After the initial tibial and femoral resections were performed, the flexion and extension gaps were balanced using navigation, and a 4 mm recut was made in the distal femur. The remaining femoral cuts were made, the femoral component was downsized by resecting an additional 4 mm of bone off the posterior condyles, and the polyethylene was increased by 4 mm to create a situation of a well-balanced knee with an elevated joint line. Real implants were used in the study to eliminate any inherent error or laxity in the trials. The navigation system was used to measure overall coronal plane laxity by measuring the mechanical alignment angle at maximum extension, 30, 45, 60 and 90 degrees of flexion, when applying a standardized varus/valgus load of 9.8 [Nm] across the knee using a 4 kg spring-load located at 25 cm distal to the knee joint line (Figure 1). Coronal plane laxity was defined as the absolute difference (in degrees) between the mean mechanical alignment angle obtained from applying a standardized varus and valgus stress at 0, 30, 45, 60 and 90 degrees. Each measurement was performed three separate times. Two tailed student t-tests were performed to analyze whether there was difference in the mean mechanical alignment angle at 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° between the well balanced scenario and following a 4 mm joint line elevation with an otherwise well balanced knee. Results. In the setting of a 4 mm elevated joint line, overall coronal-plane laxity was increased by a mean of 1.5° at 45° of flexion, and 1.3° at 60° of flexion (p < 0.05 for each flexion angle). (Figure 2) However, there was no difference at 0° and 90° in the coronal plane laxity between the well-balanced TKA and the TKA that was well balanced but had a 4 mm elevated joint line. Conclusions. Using a reliable, accurate, and reproducible method of measuring coronal plane laxity, we have shown that in the setting of a an elevated joint during total knee arthroplasty, regardless if the knee is well balanced in full extension and 90° of flexion, coronal plane laxity will be significantly higher in mid-flexion compared to the well balanced state

Knee replacements may be unstable in the: 1. Plane of motion instability, due to recurvatum or buckling (in flexion). 2. Coronal plane or varus-valgus instability and 3. Flexed position. The third, flexion instability, has been well described and is characterised clinically by early, easy, superior flexion that is then compromised by difficulties with ascending and descending stairs, recurrent effusions and peri-articular tenderness. This “flexion instability” results generally from a flexion gap that is more spacious than the extension gap, where the polyethylene insert has been selected to permit full extension. The term “mid-flexion” instability should not be used as a synonym for “flexion instability”. The concept of mid-flexion instability implies that the knee is stable in extension and stable in flexion (90 degrees) but unstable at points in between. The most common error in assessment probably occurs when surgeons observe stability to varus-valgus stress with the knee locked in full extension, where it is not appreciated that the posterior structures are tight and stabilising the knee. Once the knee if flexed enough to relax these structures, the true “flexion instability is revealed. This is not “mid-flexion” instability. It is conceivable, that an arthroplasty might be designed where the geometry of the femoral condylar curve is such a large, recessed radius that the collateral ligaments are tight in both full extension and 90 degrees of flexion, but unstable in between. There have been marketing allegations that one product or another has been designed in a way to result in “mid-flexion instability. The only published information is based on finite element analysis models. There is scant literature on “mid-flexion” instability”. Laboratory investigations with cadavers, concluded that proximal elevation of the joint line may create “mid-flexion” instability as a result of altering collateral ligament function. Computer models have questioned this effect. One clinical report describes “mid-flexion” (rotational) instability in a revision arthroplasty. So-called “anatomic alignment”, posterior stabilization and resection of distal femur to correct flexion contractures have been alleged to cause “mid-flexion” instability

Introduction. Acquiring adaptive soft-tissue balance is one of the most important factors in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there have been few reports regarding to alteration of tolerability of varus/valgus stress between before and after TKA. In particular, there is no enough data about mid-flexion stability. Based on these backgrounds, it is hypothesized that alteration of varus/valgus tolerance may influence post-operative results in TKA. The purpose of this study is an investigation of in vivo kinematic analyses of tolerability of varus/valgus stress before and after TKA, comparing to clinical results. Materials and Methods. A hundred knees of 88 consecutive patients who had knees of osteoarthritis with varus deformity were investigated in this study. All TKAs (Triathlon, Stryker) were performed using computer assisted navigation system. The kinematic parameters of the soft-tissue balance, and amount of coronal relative movement between femur and tibia were obtained by interpreting kinematics, which display graphs throughout the range of motion (ROM) in the navigation system. Femoro-tibial alignments were recorded under the stress of varus and valgus before the procedure and after implantation of all components. In each ROM (0, 30, 60, 90, 120 degrees), the data of coronal relative movement between femur and tibia (tolerability) were analyzed before and after implantation. Furthermore, correlations between tolerability of varus/valgus and clinical improvement revealed by ROM and Knee society score (KSS) were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. Results. Evaluation of soft tissue balance with navigation system revealed that the tolerance of coronal relative movement between femur and tibia (varus/valgus) after implantation was significantly decreased compared with before implantation even in mid-flexion range. There were no significant correlations between tolerability of coronal relative movement and improvement of extension range and KSS. However, mid-flexion tolerability showed negative correlation with flexion range. Discussion. One of the most important principles for ligament balancing in TKA for varus knees is involved that the medial extension gap should be within 1–3mm to avoid flexion contracture and a feeling of instability, the medial flexion gap should be equal or 1–2mm larger to the medial extension gap, and lateral extension laxity up to 5 degrees is acceptable. However, there have been few reports measuring laxity from 30 to 60 degrees. In this study, the tolerance of coronal relative movement was significantly limited even in mid-flexion. However, mid-flexion tightness was not significantly correlated with clinical results except for flexion range. This result might be suggested that high tolerability of coronal relative movement in mid-flexion range may lead to widening of flexion range of motion of the knee after TKA. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction/Aim. Mid-flexion instability is a well-documented, but often poorly understood cause of failure of TKA. NAVIO robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) offers a novel, integrative approach as a planning, execution as well as an evaluation tool in TKA surgery. RA-TKA provides a hybrid planning technique of measured resection and gap balancing- generating a predictive soft-tissue balance model, prior to making cuts. Concurrently, the system uses a semi-active robot to facilitate both the execution and verification of the plan, as it pertains to both the static and dynamic anatomy. The goal of this study was to assess the ability of the NAVIO RA-TKA to plan, execute and deliver an individualized approach to the soft-tissue balance of the knee, specifically in the “mid-flexion” arc of motion. Materials and Methods. Between May and September 2018, 50 patients underwent NAVIO RA-TKA. Baseline demographics were collected, including age, gender, BMI, and range of motion. The NAVIO imageless technique was used to plan the procedure, including: surface-mapping of the static anatomy; objective assessment of the dynamic, soft-tissue anatomy; and then application of a hybrid of measured-resection and gap-balancing technique. Medial and lateral gaps as predicted by the software were recorded throughout the entire arc of motion at 15° increments. After executing the plan and placing the components, actual medial and lateral gaps were recorded throughout the arc of motion. Results. In the assessment of coronal-plane balance, the average deviation from the predicted plan between 0–90° was 0.9mm in both the medial and lateral compartments (range 0.5–1.2mm). In the mid-flexion arc (15–75°), final soft-tissue stability was within 1.0mm of the predictive plan (range 0.9–1.2mm). Discussion/Conclusions. In this study, NAVIO RA-TKA demonstrated a highly accurate and reproducible surgical technique to plan, execute and verify a balanced a soft-tissue envelope in TKA. Objective soft-tissue balancing of the TKA can now be performed, including the mid-flexion arc of motion. Further analysis can determine if these objective measurements will translate into improved patient-reported outcome scores

Introduction. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) restores mechanical alignment and reduces lateral subluxation of the tibia. However, medial compartment translation remains abnormal compared to the native knee in mid-flexion Intra-operative adjustment of implant thickness can modulate ligament tension and may improve knee kinematics. However, the relationship between insert thickness, ligament loads, and knee kinematics is not well understood. Therefore, we used a computational model to assess the sensitivity of knee kinematics, and cruciate and collateral ligament forces to tibial component thickness with fixed bearing medial UKA. Methods. A computational model of the knee with subject-specific bone geometries, articular cartilage, and menisci was developed using multibody dynamics software (Fig 1a). The ligaments were represented with multiple non-linear, tension-only force elements, and incorporated mean structural properties. The 3D geometries of the femoral and tibial components of the Stryker Triathlon fixed-bearing UKA were captured using a laser scanner. An arthroplasty surgeon aligned the femoral and tibial components to the articular surfaces within the model (Fig 1b). The intact and UKA models were passively flexed from 0 to 90° under a 10 N compressive load. The tibial polyethylene insert was modeled by the orthopaedic surgeon to create a “balanced” knee. The modeled polyethylene insert thickness was then increased by 2 mm and decreased 2mm (in increments of 1mm) to simulate over- and under-stuffing, respectively. Outcomes were anterior-posterior (AP) translation of the femur on the tibia in the medial compartment, and forces seen by the ACL and MCL during mid-flexion (from 30 to 60° flexion). The mean differences between the intact knee model and all other experimental conditions for each outcome were calculated across mid-flexion. Results. All outcomes are presented relative to the intact knee model. A balanced medial UKA caused an average of 1.7 mm anterior translation of the medial compartment through mid-flexion (Table 1). Understuffing increased anterior translation of the medial compartment up to 3.7 mm on average. Overstuffing altered the anterior position of the medial compartment to 1.2 mm on average. The predicted ACL and MCL average loads in the balanced medial UKA differed from the intact model through mid-flexion by 2.7 N and 6.0 N, respectively (Table. 1). Overstuffing increased ACL and MCL load by 15.5 N and by 27.2 N, respectively. Understuffing by 2 mm decreased ACL and MCL load by 1.5 N at most. Discussion. A computational model incorporating a fixed-bearing medial UKA revealed that understuffing increased AP translation of the medial compartment in mid-flexion. In contrast, overstuffing increased ACL and MCL loads in mid-flexion). Thus, it is critical to achieve a compromise between insert thickness and ligament balance to obtain the most normal kinematics and ligament loads. Interestingly, no amount of over- or under-stuffing restored the AP position of the medial compartment to that of the intact model. This could be due to the inability of the flat polyethylene surface to provide “normal” AP constraint. Altogether, sensitivity analyses using computational modeling provide a valuable tool to assess the effect of implant position on knee mechanics

Introduction. An equal knee joint height during flexion and extension is of critical importance in optimizing soft-tissue balancing following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is a paucity of data regarding the in-vivo knee joint height behavior. This study evaluated in-vivo heights and anterior-posterior (AP) translations of the medial and lateral femoral condyles before and after a cruciate-retaining (CR)-TKA using two flexion axes: surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) and geometric center axis (GCA). Methods. Eleven patient with advanced medial knee osteoarthritis (age: 51–73 years) who scheduled for a CR TKA and 9 knees from 8 healthy subjects (age: 23–49 years) were recruited. 3D models of the tibia and femur were created from their MR images. Dual fluoroscopic images of each knee were acquired during a weight-bearing single leg lunge. The OA knee was imaged again one year after surgery using the fluoroscopy during the same weight-bearing single leg lunge. The in vivo positions of the knee along the flexion path were determined using a 2D/3D matching technique. The GCA and sTEA were determined based on existing methods. Besides the anterior-posterior translation, the femoral condyle heights were determined using the distances from the medial and lateral epicondyle centers on the sTEA and GCA to the tibial plateau surface in coronal plane (Fig. 1). The paired t-test was applied to compare the medial and lateral condyle motion within each group (Healthy, OA, and CR-TKA). Two-way ANOVA followed post hoc Newman–Keuls test was adopted to detect significant differences among the groups. p<0.05 was considered significant. Results. The results demonstrated that following TKA, the medial and lateral femoral condyle heights were not equal at mid-flexion (15° to 45°, medial condyle lower then lateral by 2.4mm at least, p<0.01), although the knees were well-balanced at 0° and 90° (Fig. 2). While the femoral condyle heights increased from the pre-operative values (>2mm increase on average, p<0.05), they were similar to the intact knees except that the medial sTEA was lower than the intact medial condyle between 0 and 90°. At deep flexion (>90°), both condyles were significantly higher (>2mm, p <0.01) than the healthy knees. Anterior femoral translation of the TKA knee was more pronounce at mid-flexion (Fig. 3), whereas limited posterior translation was found at deep flexion. Conclusion. Femoral condyle heights and AP translations of the CR TKA knees were significantly different from the healthy knees during the weight bearing flexion activity when measured using both the sTEA and GCA, especially at mid-flexion (15° to 45°) and deep flexion (>90°). These results suggest that a well-balanced knee intra-operatively might not necessarily result in mid-flexion and deep flexion balance during functional weight-bearing motion, implying mid-flexion instability and deep flexion tightness of the knee. The data could be useful for improvement of future prostheses designs and surgical techniques in treatment of patients with end-stage medial knee OA

Background. Achieving good ligament balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential to prevent early failure and revision surgery. Poor balance and instability are well-defined, however, an ideal ligament balance target across all patients is not well-understood. In this study we investigate the achieved ligament balance using an imageless, intra-operative dynamic balancing tool and its relation to patient reported outcomes. Methods. A prospective, multi-surgeon, multi-center study investigated the use of a dynamic ligament-balancing tool in combination with a robotic-assisted navigation platform using the APEX knee (OMNI-Corin, Raynham MA). After all resections, the femoral trial and a computer-controlled tensioning device in place of the tibial tray was inserted into the knee joint. The difference in medial and lateral (ML) gaps when balancing the knee under constant load at extension (10°), mid-flexion (30°) and flexion (90°) was captured. Patients completed the KOOS questionnaire at 3 months ± 2 weeks post-surgery and considered the past 7 days as a timeframe for responses. Pearson's correlation was used to determine linear correlations between factors and ANOVA tests were used to determine differences in categorical data. Results. Thirty patients have currently completed 3 months KOOS questionnaires for analysis (age: 68±9.3yrs, Male: 43%). Strong correlations were found between the difference in ML gap for KOOS symptoms and pain in extension (r=−0.54, p=0.002, r=−0.50, p=0.005, respectively) and mid flexion (r=−0.52, p=0.003, r=−0.48, p=0.007, respectively), but not in full flexion (r=−0.13, p=0.5, r=−0.23, p=0.22, respectively). A threshold of 1.5 mm difference in joint gap under constant load was used to distinguish between balanced and more lax knees medially or laterally. Worse KOOS symptoms were found in patients with tighter lateral laxity in extension and mid flexion (△=15 points, p=0.03, △=21 points, p=0.0002, respectively) compared to the rest of the cohort, see Figure 1. Similarly, worse KOOS pain was found for tight lateral laxity in mid-flexion (△=14 points, p=0.02). No significant differences were found in full flexion or for patients with a tight medial side at any flexion angle. Stronger differences in extension and mid flexion may reflect the type of activities and range of motion most commonly encountered as a TKA patient. A younger population engaging higher demand activities may be more sensitive to coronal soft tissue balance in full flexion. Conclusion. Improved patient outcomes were found to correlate with a neutrally-balanced or tighter medial soft tissue profile compared to tighter lateral structures. These results reflect the behaviour of the native knee. The cohort investigated here is small and data collection is ongoing. Further data will be needed to determine if these results can be generalized and to investigate the potential of patient specificity in ideal ligament balancing. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Compared with the cruciate-retaining (CR) insert for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the cruciate-substituting (CS) insert has a raised anterior lip, providing greater anterior constraint, and thus, can be used in cases of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) sacrifice. However, studies have shown that the PCL maintains femoral rollback during flexion, acts as a stabilizer against distal traction force and aids knee joint proprioception; therefore, the argument for PCL excision in CS TKA remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to analyze CS TKA kinematics and identify the role of the PCL. Methods. Seven fresh-frozen lower-extremity cadaver specimens were analyzed using Orthomap. ®. Precision Knee Navigation software (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ, USA). They were surgically implanted with Triathlon. ®. components (Stryker Orthopaedics). The CS insert has a raised anterior lip, and the posterior geometry shares the same profile as the CR, so we can choose retaining or sacrificing the PCL. Six patterns were analyzed: (1) natural knee; (2) only anterior cruciate ligament excision; (3) CS TKA, PCL retention, and bony island preservation; (4) CS TKA, PCL retention, and bony island resection; (5) CS TKA and PCL excision; and (6) CR TKA and PCL excision. Center of the knee and center of the proximal tibia were registered using navigation system, and the magnitudes of the condylar translation were evaluated. And then, using trigonometric function, the magnitude of anterior-posterior translation of the femur was calculated. Results. PCL excision patterns showed that the magnitude of anterior-posterior (AP) translation was higher in mid-flexion and lower in deep flexion than in other patterns (Fig. 1). Comparing two PCL excision patterns, in CS insert, the anterior translation magnitude was a little lower in extension and 30° flexion. Comparing two PCL retention patterns, the both posterior translation magnitudes in deep flexion were comparable to that of the natural knee. Discussion. Very few studies have reported about comparison of PCL retention with PCL excision in CS TKA. Omori et al. evaluated the medial pivot type TKA, and found that the design showed no femoral rollback under the PCL-sacrificing condition. In our study, increased anterior translation magnitudes in mid-flexion indicated paradoxical roll-forward, and decreased posterior translation magnitudes in deep flexion indicated decreased rollback. In other words, PCL excision in CS TKA caused mid-flexion instability and decreased the femoral rollback, so raised anterior lip was not likely to contribute to TKA kinematics. Another research is necessary to evaluate the effects of the raised anterior lip. On the other hand, PCL retention in CS TKA maintained physiological femoral rollback. The AP translation magnitude was not dependents on the bony island. Conclusions. We had better retain the PCL in raised anterior lip type CS TKA to ensure physiological knee kinematics. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).

Introduction. Many fluoroscopic studies on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have identified kinematic variabilities compared to the normal knee, with many subjects experiencing paradoxical motion patterns. The intent of this study was to investigate the results of a newly designed PCR TKA to determine kinematic variabilities and assess these kinematic patterns with those previously documented for the normal knee. Methods. The study involves determining the in vivo kinematics for 80 subjects compared to the normal knee. 10 subjects have a normal knee, 40 have a Journey II PCR TKA and 40 subjects with the Journey II XR TKA (BCR). Although all PCR subjects have been evaluated, we are continuing to evaluate subjects with a BCR TKA. All TKAs were performed by a single surgeon and deemed clinically successful. All subjects performed a deep knee bend from full extension to maximum flexion while under fluoroscopic surveillance. Kinematics were calculated via 3D-to-2D registration at 30° increments from full extension to maximum flexion. Anterior/posterior translation of the medial (MAP) and lateral (LAP) femoral condyles and femorotibial axial rotation were compared during ranges of motion in relation to the function of the cruciate ligaments. Results. Of the 40 PCR TKAs, the average overall flexion was 112.6°, while the average for normal subjects was 139.0°. Initial BCR subjects revealed a higher than expected 128.0°. From 0=30° knee flexion, PCR subjects demonstrated −4.74±4.94 mm of posterior LAP movement, −2.04±4.07 mm of MAP movement and 3.61±8.13° of external axial rotation. In the same range of motion, normal subjects exhibited −8.80±3.32 mm of LAP movement, −3.81±1.03 mm of MAP movement and an axial rotation of 11.34±3.78°. From 30=90° knee flexion, PCR subjects demonstrated 4.37±8.26 mm of LAP movement, 0.12±7.95 mm of MAP movement and 0.79±11.43° of axial rotation. In the same range of motion, normal subjects exhibited −4.28±3.13 mm of LAP movement, −1.11±2.76 mm of MAP movement and axial rotation of 6.54±4.33°. From 0°-maximum flexion, PCR subjects demonstrated −2.71±5.37 mm of LAP movement, 1.79±4.88 mm of MAP movement and 5.99±5.26° of axial rotation. In the same range of motion, normal subjects exhibited −17.83±6.04 mm of LAP movement, −9.11±4.93 mm of MAP movement and axial rotation of 23.66±7.81°. Overall, the BCR subject displayed kinematic patterns similar to those of a normal knee; more detailed numbers will be presented in the presentation. Discussion. Subjects having a PCR TKA experienced excellent weight-bearing flexion and kinematic patterns similar to the normal knee, but less in magnitude. These subjects experienced posterior femoral rollback in early and late flexion. During mid-flexion, subjects having a PCR TKA did experience some variable motion patterns, which may be due to the absence of the ACL. Subjects having a BCR TKA experienced more continuous rollback throughout flexion, more similar to the normal knee. Similar to the normal knee, subjects having a PCR TKA did experience progressive axial rotation throughout knee flexion (Figures). Significance. While they still experience normal-like rollback during early (0°–30°) and late flexion (90°-120°), subjects with a PCR TKA consistently demonstrated Anteriorization of the joint in mid-flexion

In years past, the most common reason for revision following knee replacement was polyethylene wear. A more recent study indicates that polyethylene wear is relatively uncommon as a cause for total knee revision counting for only 10% or fewer of revisions. The most common reason for revision currently is aseptic loosening followed closely by instability and infection. The time to revision was surprisingly short. In a recent series only 30% of knees were greater than 5 years from surgery at the time of revision. The most common time interval was less than 2 years. This is likely because of the higher incidence of infection and instability that occurs most commonly at a relatively early time frame. Evaluation of a painful total knee should take into account these findings. All total knees that are painful within 5 years of surgery should be assumed to be infected until proven otherwise. Therefore, virtually all should be aspirated for cell count, differential, and culture. Alpha-defensin is also available in cases in which a patient may have been on antibiotics within a month or less, as well as cases in which diagnosis is a challenge for some reason. Instability can be diagnosed with physical exam focusing on mid-flexion instability which can be usually determined with the patient seated and the knee in mid-flexion, with the foot flat on the floor at which point sagittal plane laxity can be discerned. This is also frequently associated with symptoms of giving way and recurring effusions and difficulty descending stairs. A new phenomenon of tibial de-bonding has been described, which can be a challenge to diagnose. Radiographs can appear normal when loosening occurs between the implant and the cement mantle. This seems to be more common with the use of higher viscosity cement. Obviously this is technique dependent since good results have been reported with the use of high viscosity cement. Component malposition can cause stiffness and pain and relatively good results have been reported by component revision when malrotation has been confirmed with CT scan. When infection, instability and loosening are not present, extra-articular causes should be ruled out including lumbar spine, vascular compromise, complex regional pain syndromes and fibromyalgia, and peri-articular causes such as bursitis, tendonitis, tendon impingement among others. One of the most common causes of pain following total knee is unrealistic patient expectations. Performing total knee replacement in early stages of arthritis with only mild to moderate symptoms and radiographic changes has been associated with persistent pain and dissatisfaction. It may be prudent to obtain the immediate preoperative x-rays to determine if early intervention was undertaken and patients have otherwise normal appearing total knee x-rays and a negative work up. A recent study indicated that this was likely a cause or a major contributing factor to persistent pain following otherwise a well performed knee replacement. A national multicenter study of the appropriateness of indications for TKA also indicated that early intervention was a major cause of persistent pain, dissatisfaction, and failure to improve following total knee replacement

Introduction. Controversy still exists as to whether total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides reproducible knee kinematics during activities. In this study, we evaluated the in vivokinematics of stair-climbing after TKA using a 3D-to-2D model-to-image registration technique. Patients and Methods. A total of twenty four knees in nineteen patients following cruciate-retaining (CR) or posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA were randomly included in the study. The twenty-four knees included 22 female knees and 2 male knees in patients aged 73 years. The pre-operative diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 22 knees and rheumatoid arthritis in 2 knees. The average follow-up period after surgery was 29 months, and average post-operative knee extension/flexion angle was 2°/121°. The average knee score was 93 and the average functional score was 77. Continuous sagittal radiological images were obtained during stair-climbing for each patient using a large flat panel detector. Anteroposterior (AP) tibiofemoral position, implant flexion, and axial rotation angles were determined in three dimensions using a 3D-to-2D model-to-image registration technique. In CR TKA, the minimum distances between the femoral trochlea and the intercondylar eminence of the tibial insert were measured using a CAD software program. In PS TKA, the minimum distances between the femoral cam and the posterior aspect of the tibial post and between the femoral trochlea and the anterior aspect of the tibial post were measured. Results. The average implant flexion angle at foot strike/toe off during stair-climbing was 65.6°/−5.9° after CR TKA and 72.3°/−0.5° after PS TKA. The average AP tibiofemoral position from the center of the tibial insert at foot strike/toe off was 9.2mm posterior/1.0mm posterior after CR TKA and 8.6mm posterior/1.0mm posterior after PS TKA. The average tibiofemoral rotation angle at foot strike/toe off was −6.0°/−2.1° after CR TKA and −8.6°/2.7° after PS TKA. In CR TKA, the average of the minimum distance between the intercondylar notch of the femoral trochlea and the intercondylar eminence of the tibial insert at foot strike/toe off was 26.9mm/4.6mm. No knees demonstrated impingement of the femoral trochlea on the tibial insert (Fig. 1). In PS TKA, the average of the minimum post-cam and femoral trochlea-anterior post distances at foot strike/toe off were 4.0 ± 1.9 mm/18.2 ± 4.1 mm and 19.3mm/1.6mm. No knees demonstrated post-cam engagement, but four knees demonstrated anterior tibial post impingement from −0.5° of implant flexion (Fig. 2). Discussion. This study characterized knee kinematics during stair-climbing after two different types of total knee prostheses. Mid-flexion AP stability was demonstrated in all knees after CR TKA during stair-climbing. It could be assumed that the retained posterior cruciate ligament was functioning. However, paradoxical femoral translation and/or reverse axial rotation due to deficiency of the anterior cruciate ligament were shown in 75% of knees at low flexion. The post-cam mechanism did not function during stair-climbing after PS TKA and 33% of knees demonstrated forward sliding of the femur at mid-flexion. The post-cam mechanism should be configured to function at mid-flexion. Unintended anterior tibial post impingement, which was observed in 33% of knees at knee extension, provided anterior femoral position

Introduction. Mid-flexion stability is believed to be an important factor influencing successful clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. The post of a posterior-stabilizing (PS) knee engages the cam in >60° of flexion, allowing for the possibility of paradoxical mid-flexion instability in less than 60° of flexion. Highly-conforming polyethylene insert designs were introduced as an alternative to PS knees. The cruciate-substituting (CS) knee was designed to provide anteroposterior stability throughout the full range of motion. Methods. As part of a prospective, randomized, five-year clinical trial, we performed quantitative stress x-rays on a total of 65 subjects in two groups (CS and PS) who were more than five years postoperative with a well-functioning total knee. Antero-posterior stability of the knee was evaluated using stress radiographs in the lateral position. A 15 kg force was applied anteriorly and posteriorly with the knee in 45° and 90° of flexion. Measurements of anterior and posterior displacement were made by tracing lines along the posterior margin of the tibial component and the posterior edge of the femoral component, which were parallel to the posterior tibial cortex. (Figures 1–4). Results. In both 45° and 90° of flexion, the PS group demonstrated significantly less total anterior/posterior displacement compared to the CS group, (45°: 7.33 mm vs 12.44 mm, p ≤ 0.0001, 90°: 3.54 mm vs. 9.74 mm, p ≤ 0.0001). (Figures 5,6) The only statistically significant outcomes score difference was seen with the KSS function score in the female subset, with the CS score lower (81.8) compared to the PS score (94.7). (Figure 7) All of the other scores, KSS pain/motion and KSS function scores, as well as the LEAS and FJS scores, were all similar statistically, as was the range of motion and the long axis x-ray alignment. Discussion & Conclusion. The post and cam posterior-stabilized knee has traditionally been thought to be the best choice for providing stability for knee replacement with PCL-insufficiency or sacrifice. However, this difference in stability as measured with stress xrays did not correlate with any detectible differences in any of the clinical outcomes measurements collected (Knee Society Score, Forgotten Joint Score, Lower Extremity Activity Scale) or in the range of motion or coronal alignment, with the exception of the female subgroup KSS function score. In summary, the CS knee demonstrates greater total antero-posterior laxity compared to the PS knee, as measured by stress radiographs, but there is not a strong correlation with clinical outcomes measurements. A greater number of subjects and/or a younger, higher demand population studied with this protocol might produce greater differences in the outcomes, especially in the FJS score. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Sagittal stability of the knee is believed to be of significant importance following total knee arthroplasty. We examine four different knee designs at a minimum of twenty-four months postoperatively. Sagittal stability was measured at four degrees of flexion: 0°; 30°; 60°; and 90°, to examine the effect of design on mid-flexion stability. The knee designs included were: the rotating platform LCS design (DePuy); the cruciate sparing Triathlon system (Stryker); SAIPH system (Matortho, UK); and the medial rotating knee design, MRK (Matortho, UK). Following ethical approval, 64 cases were enrolled into the study, 22 male and 42 female. Inclusion criteria included: a minimum of 18 months from surgery; ability to flex beyond 90 degrees; and have no postoperative complications. 18 LCS, 18 MRK, 14 SAIPH and 14 Triathlon knee designs were analysed. Sagittal stability was measured using the KT1000 device. Active range of movement was measured using a hand held goniometer and recorded as was Oxford knee score, WOMAC knee score, SF12 and Kujala patellofemoral knee score. Mean follow-up was 33.7 months postoperative, with a mean age of 72 years. Mean weight was 82.7kgs and height 164cms. There was no significant difference in preoperative demographics between the groups. Mean active post-operative range of motion of the knee was from 2–113° with no significant difference between groups. Sagittal stability was similar in all four groups in full extension; however the MRK and SAIPH designs showed improved stability in the mid-range of flexion (30–90°). Patient satisfaction also showed a similar trend with MRK achieving better patient reported functional outcomes and satisfaction than that of the SAIPH, LCS and Triathlon systems. All four knee designs demonstrated good post-operative range of movement with comparative improvement of patient scores to other reported studies. The MRK and SAIPH knee design showed an improved mid-flexion sagittal stability with better patient reported satisfaction and functional scores