Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use is becoming more widespread in the geriatric population. Depending on the type of DOAC, several days are required for its anticoagulant effects to resorb, which may lead to surgical delays. This can have an important impact on hip fracture patients who require surgery. The goal of the current study is to compare surgical delays, mortality and complications for hip fracture patients who were on a DOAC to those who were not. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university hospital in Sherbrooke. All hip fracture patients between 2012 and 2018 who were on a DOAC prior to their surgery were included. These patients were matched with similar patients who were not on an anticoagulant (non-DOAC) for age, sex, type of fracture and date of operation. Demographic and clinical data were collected for all patients. Surgical delay was defined as time of admission to time of surgery. Mortality and complications up to one year postoperative were also noted. Each cohort comprised of 74 patients. There were no statistically signification differences in Charleson Comorbidty Index and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores between cohorts. Surgical delay was significantly longer for DOAC patients (36.3±22.2 hours vs. 18.6±18.9 hours, p < 0 .001). Mortality (6.1%) and overall complication (33.8%) rates were similar between the two cohorts. However, there were more surgical reinterventions in DOAC patients than non-DOAC ones (16.2% vs. 0.0%, p < 0 .001). Among DOAC patients, mortality was greater for those operated after 48 hours (23.1% vs. 3.3%, p < 0 .05) and complications were more frequent for those operated after 24 hours (52.0% vs. 37.5%, p < 0 .05). Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use in hip fracture patients is associated with longer surgical delays. Longer delays to surgery are associated with higher mortality and complication rates in hip fracture patients taking a DOAC. Hip fracture patients should have their surgery performed as soon as medically possible, regardless of anticoagulant use

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use is becoming more widespread in the geriatric population. Depending on the type of DOAC, several days are required for its anticoagulant effects to resorb, which may lead to surgical delays. This can have an important impact on hip fracture patients who require surgery. The goal of the current study is to compare surgical delays, mortality and complications for hip fracture patients who were on a DOAC to those who were not. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university hospital in Sherbrooke. All hip fracture patients between 2012 and 2018 who were on a DOAC prior to their surgery were included. These patients were matched with similar patients who were not on an anticoagulant (non-DOAC) for age, sex, type of fracture and date of operation. Demographic and clinical data were collected for all patients. Surgical delay was defined as time of admission to time of surgery. Mortality and complications up to one year postoperative were also noted. Each cohort comprised of 74 patients. There were no statistically signification differences in Charleson Comorbidty Index and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores between cohorts. Surgical delay was significantly longer for DOAC patients (36.3±22.2 hours vs. 18.6±18.9 hours, p < 0 .001). Mortality (6.1%) and overall complication (33.8%) rates were similar between the two cohorts. However, there were more surgical reinterventions in DOAC patients than non-DOAC ones (16.2% vs. 0.0%, p < 0 .001). Among DOAC patients, mortality was greater for those operated after 48 hours (23.1% vs. 3.3%, p < 0 .05) and complications were more frequent for those operated after 24 hours (52.0% vs. 37.5%, p < 0 .05). Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use in hip fracture patients is associated with longer surgical delays. Longer delays to surgery are associated with higher mortality and complication rates in hip fracture patients taking a DOAC. Hip fracture patients should have their surgery performed as soon as medically possible, regardless of anticoagulant use

Most of current literatures advise on thromboprophylaxis with injectable LMWH for trauma patients. Injectable anticoagulants have got inherent problems of pain, bruising and difficulty in administering the drug, which leads to low compliance. Clexane is derived from a pig's intestinal mucosa, hence could be objectionable to certain proportion of patients because of their religious beliefs. Oral anticoagulants have been used as thromboprophylactic agents in hip and knee arthroplasty. However there is not enough literature supporting their use as thromboprophylactic agent in ambulatory trauma patients with ankle fracture being managed non-operatively as out-patient. This study looks into the efficacy of oral anticoagulant in preventing VTE in ambulatory trauma patients requiring temporary lower limb immobilisation for management of ankle fracture. The end point of this study was symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (either proximal or distal) and pulmonary embolism. Routine assessment with a VTE assessment risk proforma for all patients with temporary lower limb immobilisation following lower limb injury requiring plaster cast is done in the fracture clinic at this university hospital. These patients are categorised as low or high risk for a venous thromboembolic event depending on their risk factor and accordingly started on prophylactic dose of oral anticoagulant (Rivaroxaban - Factor Xa inhibitor). Before the therapy is started these patients have a routing blood check, which includes a full blood count and urea and electrolyte. Therapy is continued for the duration of immobilisation. Bleeding risk assessment is done using a proforma based on NICE guideline CG92. If there is any concern specialist haematologist advice is sought. A total of 200 consecutive patients who presented to the fracture clinic with ankle fracture, which was managed in plaster cast non-operatively, were included in this study. They were followed up for three months following injury. This was done by checking these patients’ radiology report including ultrasound and CT pulmonary scan (CTPA) test on hospital's electronic system. Fracture of the lateral malleolus which include Weber-A, Weber-B and Weber-C fractures were included in the study. Also included were bimalleolar fractures and isolated medial malleolus fractures. Complex pilon fractures, polytrauma and paediatric patients were excluded from the study. Only one case of plaster associated isolated distal deep vein (soleal vein) thrombosis was reported in this patient subgroup. There was no incidence of proximal deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. No significant bleeding event was reported. Injectable low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) rather than oral anticoagulant has been recommended by most of the studies and guidelines as main thromboprophylactic agent for lower limb trauma patients

Rivaroxaban was introduced for thromboprophylaxis at the Royal Cornwall Hospital for hip and knee arthroplasty surgery in October 2009. We identified 140 patients from theatre logbooks who underwent elective joint replacement between October 2009 and March 2010. Patient notes, computer and DVT clinic records and WebPacs data were collected to determine the uptake of the new drug and the incidence of wound problems, DVTs and any other post-operative complications. In our sample 55.7% [78/140] patients received rivaroxaban. 10.3% [8/78] of patients on rivaroxaban suffered wound complications compared with 6.6% [4/62] of patients on alternative anticoagulation. Three patients suffered DVT's, 1 of whom was taking rivaroxaban. There were a further 6 patients, 4 on rivaroxaban, with leg swelling severe enough to merit investigation, all of whom had negative doppler scans. Bleeding events included 4 patients with postoperative haematemesis of which 2 were taking rivaroxaban. Five patients, all under different surgical operators of which 3 had taken rivaroxaban, developed stiff total knee replacements and were offered MUA or physiotherapy.

Aim. Prosthetic joint replacement is more commonly done in the elderly group of patients due to an increase pathology related to joint degeneration that comes with age. In this age group is also more frequent having underling condition that may predispose to a prosthetic joint infection. Also, the pharmacological intervention in those patients may play an important role as a risk factor for infection after joint replacement surgery. The use of oral anticoagulants seems to be particularly increased in elderly patients but there aren't enough data published to support an association between prosthetic joint infection and the use of oral anticoagulants. Identifying risk factors in elderly patients age >75 years old with a special focus on the oral anticoagulation therapy is the aim of the study. Methods. In a retrospective study from 2011 till 2018 all the patients >75 years old with knee and hip replacement surgery have been review looking for acute prosthetic infection and risk factors that may be predispose to it. Patients with previous surgery or any other mechanical complication that needed intervention on the same area have been excluded. Results. A total of 1220 patients have been included (801 knee replacement surgery and 419 hip replacement surgery). The mean age was 79.5 ± 3.44 years and most of the patients were women (72,6%). The infection rate was 2,5%. Several factors have been identified to be associated with acute infection. (Table.1.). The patients receiving oral anticoagulants had an increased risk of infection (OR 3.63 (1.60–7.74), p=0.002). Conclusions. Even all the risk factors associated with risk infection have been described previously, the relevant aspect is the increased risk of prosthetic joint infection in patients receiving oral anticoagulants

In recent years, many changes have taken place regarding agents used for chemical thromboprophylaxis in elective joint replacement. Enoxaparin, Rivaroxaban, Dabigatran and Apixaban are all now recommended in NICE CG92 and their use varies nationally. Whilst data exists comparing oral anticoagulants to Enoxaparin, there is little data on the comparative efficacy of the individual oral anticoagulants. This study analyses data from Warrington Hospital, where each of the above oral anticoagulants was used trustwide in 3 successive years following hip and knee arthroplasty. We analysed similar 4–5 month periods in 2010(Rivaroxiban), 2011(Dabigatran) and 2012(Apixaban). The study was done prospectively and data was collected contemporaneously. The total sample size was 475 patients. Data was collected through electronic hospital patient records. Patients were excluded if data was incomplete. We defined our primary outcome as any complication requiring the drug to be omitted or stopped. We found that for Rivaroxaban, 7 of 129 patients had the drug omitted or stopped (5.4%, 95% confidence interval 1.0–9.8), for Dabigatran 19 of 150 patients, (12.7%, 95% confidence interval 6.4–19.0) and for Apixaban 10 of 196 patients (5.1%, 95% confidence interval 0.9–9.3). For Rivaroxaban and Apixaban, there were no confirmed thromboembolic events; however, for Dabigatran, there were six VTEs. All three had bleeding complications, which were well below the figures published for Enoxaparin. Apixaban registered the lowest rate in our study (5.1%). This data suggests that Apixaban is a safe oral anticoagulant in elective total knee and hip replacement

In recent years, many changes have taken place regarding agents used for chemical thromboprophylaxis in elective joint replacement. Enoxaparin, Rivaroxaban, Dabigatran and Apixaban are all now recommended in NICE CG92 and their use varies nationally. While data exist comparing oral anticoagulants to Enoxaparin, there is little data on the comparative efficacy of the individual oral anticoagulants. This study analyses data from Warrington Hospital, where each of the above oral anticoagulants was used trustwide in 3 successive years following hip and knee arthroplasty. We analysed similar 4–5 month periods in 2010 (Rivaroxiban), 2011 (Dabigatran) and 2012 (Apixaban). The study was done prospectively and data was collected contemporaneously. The total sample size was 475 patients. Data was collected through electronic hospital patient records. Patients were excluded if data was incomplete. We defined our primary outcome as any complication requiring the drug to be omitted or stopped. We found that for Rivaroxaban, 7 of 129 patients had the drug omitted or stopped (5.4%, 95% confidence interval 1.0–9.8), for Dabigatran 19 of 150 patients, (12.7%, 95% confidence interval 6.4–19.0) and for Apixaban 10 of 196 patients (5.1%, 95% confidence interval 0.9–9.3). For Rivaroxaban and Apixaban, there were no confirmed thromboembolic events; however, for Dabigatran, there were six VTEs. All three had bleeding complications, which were well below the figures published for Enoxaparin. Apixaban registered the lowest rate in our study (5.1%). This data suggests that Apixaban is a safe oral anticoagulant in elective total knee and hip replacement

Novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) use in Australia has increased significantly since their introduction to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). Currently, there are no specific guidelines regarding recommencement of NOAC therapy post-operatively for patients concurrently on a NOAC and undergoing arthroplasty. To address this gap in the literature, the aim of this study was to compare the clinical and patient-reported outcomes in a patient cohort recommencing a therapeutic dose of NOAC within 24 hours of total hip or knee arthroplasty. Data was retrieved from a prospective registry (ACTRN1262000079698) containing hip and knee arthroplasties. Cases were labelled based on whether they presented on a therapeutic dose of NOAC prior to surgery or not. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise patient outcomes. Of 291 patients undergoing 331 primary arthroplasties, 9.3% were undertaking NOAC therapy prior to their surgery. In the NOAC cohort, there was a 34.5% adverse event rate, however on closer analysis of each event, it was found that none of these events were complications in relation to NOAC use. This was compared to 15.6% of the comparison cohort who experienced a range of complications, some involving bleeding events. PROMs improved to a similar degree amongst both groups. This study showed that recommencing therapeutic doses of NOACs in patients post hip and knee arthroplasty within 24 hours was safe. These findings will help guide larger scale analysis to better inform clinical guidelines pertaining to hip and knee arthroplasty

Aims. NICE recommends oral anticoagulants after lower limb arthroplasty, as they are thought to lead to better outpatient compliance than injected anticoagulants. Having prescribed self-administered Dalteparin for many years, we began using oral Dabigatran in December 2010. The change afforded an opportunity to compare compliance and acceptability of the two treatments. Methods. Patients were recruited at discharge and telephoned at 28 days. Left over doses were counted to assess compliance. Side-effects, complications and patient views were also recorded. Results. 47 patients were discharged on dalteparin, 59 on dabigatran. Total compliance rates were 81% and 56% respectively (p<0.001). However, the mean pain score associated with dalteparin was 2.4 out of 10, and 31% of patients experienced significant bruising. No patient suffered pain or bruising with dabigatran (p<0.001), but two experienced dyspepsia and four suffered wound problems. Two thromboembolic events and one gastrointestinal bleed occurred in the dalteparin group. Conclusions. Our outpatient compliance is higher for injected anticoagulants than for oral anticoagulants. This runs contrary to some of the marketing for oral agents. However, Dabigatran offers better patient acceptability than Dalteparin. While not designed or powered to show statistically significant differences in complication rates, our study has prompted closer investigation of wound problems with both treatments

Study Aim. To assess the impact of two oral thromboprophylaxis agents against Clexane with regard to range of movement (ROM) following TKR with or without haemostasis following tourniquet release. Methods & Results. Thromboprophylaxis choice following total knee replacement (TKR) has become of interest with the introduction of oral anticoagulants and support for these by NICE. Specific concerns with oral agents include a perceived elevated level of anti-coagulation and soft tissue complications. The population (n=264) was subclassified into cohorts regarding thromboprophylaxis cover: Clexane, Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran. Each subgroup was subdivided into whether surgery was performed with or without haemostasis following tourniquet release. This study demonstrates Clexane is associated with a better and earlier return of ROM post-operatively as compared to oral the thromboprophylaxis agents. This effect was more obvious when combined with haemostasis following early tourniquet release (p< 0.05). The oral thromboprophylaxis agents Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran had a relative negative effect on ROM as compared against Clexane. This was independent of whether the surgery was performed with or without haemostasis following tourniquet release. There was no different between the subgroups with repect to change of serum haemoglobin, symptomatic venous thromboembolism or rate of return to theatre. Conclusions. This study demonstrates Clexane to have a beneficial effect over the oral anticoagulants, Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran, on ROM and speed of recovery post TKR. This effect was significant (p< 0.05) when combined with genicular vessel haemostasis following early tourniquet release. We hypothesise independent of intra-operative haemostasis of genicular vessels after torniquet release, elevated small vessel ooze secondary to the oral thromboprophylaxis has a detrimental impact on ROM post TKR

Financial impact and patient satisfaction with four different anticoagulants for hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with a previous history of VTE- A prospective randomised trial. Introduction. New generation oral anticoagulants (dabigatran/rivaroxaban) have recently become available for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following hip and knee arthroplasty. Traditional therapies (warfarin/low molecular weight heparins) are less costly, but have several limitations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the financial impact of substituting enoxaparin and warfarin with newer therapies dabigatran and rivaroxaban. A secondary objective was to investigate patient satisfaction with these treatments. Methods. A randomised prospective study was conducted over a 12 month period. Patients with a history of VTE undergoing hip or knee replacement were randomised to receive one of four anticoagulants for five weeks post surgery. Information was gathered during the hospital stay and then post discharge, by telephone, for five weeks(35 days)to determine costs. The costs included cost of drug, nursing time, blood monitoring and transport costs. The patients were also asked to complete the Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scale (DASS). The DASS is a 26 item questionnaire which has 7 responses for each question. Results. Although dabigatran and rivaroxaban had higher drug acquisition costs, warfarin and enoxaparin were financially more costly overall. These additional costs were mainly due to increased blood monitoring and time for training and administration which is not required for newer therapies. DASS scores were significantly better with dabigatran (38.5±5.1) and rivaroxaban (38.6±8.3) compared to warfarin (71.8±16.2) and enoxaparin (68.5±14.2) (p< 0.001). This indicates more satisfaction for patients prescribed dabigatran or rivaroxaban compared to traditional therapies. Conclusion. The use of new generation oral anticoagulants has the potential to significantly reduce the financial burden of thromboprophylaxis on the NHS with an additional benefit of better patient satisfaction when compared to traditional therapies

Introduction. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a potentially serious complication after total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty, traditionally justifying aggressive prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOA) at the cost of an increased risk of bleeding. However, fast-track procedures might reduce the DVT risk and decrease the cost-benefit ratio of the current recommendations. The objective of this study was to compare thrombotic and bleeding risk in an unselected population of elective THA and TKA with a fast-track procedure. MATERIAL - METHODS. A series of 1,949 patients were analyzed prospectively. There were 1,136 women and 813 men, with a mean age of 70 years. In particular, 16% were previously treated by antiplatelet agents and 8% by anticoagulants. All patients followed a fast-track procedure including early walking within 24 hours of surgery, and 80% of patients returned home after surgery, with a mean length of stay of 3 days (THA) or 4 days (TKA). The occurrence of a thromboembolic event or hemorrhagic complication has been identified. Results. Out of the 1,110 THAs, 5 thromboembolic events were identified (0.4%): 2 non-fatal pulmonary embolism and 3 DVTs. There was no impact of these complications on the final result. 19 hemorrhagic complications were identified (1.7%): 10 significant haematomas (3 of which were complicated by infection), 9 anemias (with 4 transfusions). Out of the 839 TKAs, 9 thromboembolic events were identified (1.0%): 4 non-fatal pulmonary embolism and 5 DVTs. There was no impact of these complications on the final result. 14 hemorrhagic complications were identified (1.7%): 8 haematomas including 4 reoperations, 6 anemias (with 5 transfusions). Discussion. Thromboembolic complications after elective THA and TKA have virtually disappeared, with a rate of 0.7%. On the other hand, bleeding complications are now more frequent, with a rate of 1.7%. This suggests that the cost-benefit ratio of preventive treatments with LMWH or DOA should be reassessed. Prescribing LMWH or DOA after elective THA and TKA with fast-track procedures exposes the patient to a much higher risk of bleeding than thrombotic risk. The use of aspirin may represent an acceptable compromise in these patients

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) should be individualised in order to maximise the efficacy of prophylactic measures while avoiding the adverse events associated with the use of anticoagulants. At our institution, we have developed a scoring model using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, which is validated against our institutional data, to stratify patients into low- and high-risk groups for VTE. Low-risk patients are placed on aspirin 81 mg twice daily for four weeks post-operatively, and high-risk patients are placed on either a Vitamin K antagonist (warfarin), low molecular weight heparin, or other oral anticoagulants for four weeks post-operatively. All patients receive sequential pneumatic compression devices post-operatively, and patients are mobilised with physical therapy on the day of surgery. Patients who have a history of peptic ulcer disease or allergy to aspirin are also considered for other types of anticoagulation following surgery. Risk Stratification Criteria. Major comorbid risk factors utilised in our risk stratification model include history of hypercoagulability or previous VTE, active cancer or history of non-cutaneous malignancy, history of stroke, and pulmonary hypertension. We consider patients with any of these risk factors at elevated risk of VTE and therefore candidates for formal anticoagulation. Other minor risk factors include older age, bilateral surgery compared with unilateral, inflammatory bowel disease, varicose veins, obstructive sleep apnea, and history of myocardial infarction, myeloproliferative disorders, and congestive heart failure. Each minor criterion is associated with a score. The cumulative score is compared with a defined threshold and the score that surpasses the threshold indicates that the patient should receive post-operative anticoagulation. To facilitate the use of this scoring system, an iOS mobile application (VTEstimator) has been developed and can be downloaded from the app store

We present the 12 month data on the relatively novel drug Dabigatran Etexilate (Pradaxa), a new oral anticoagulant which was introduced to combat the risk of post operative venous-thromboembolic disease (VTED) in orthopaedic surgery. This drug was introduced at our hospital in March 2010 and we present our modified protocol of: using 5000u subcutaneous Dalteparin whilst in hospital and giving Dabigatran only on discharge, and at a lower dose (150mg compared to 220mg). We carried out a retrospective analysis of the notes and imaging of every patient who underwent elective hip and knee arthroplasty over 12 months since the drug was introduced. We evaluated the rate of VTED complications and the rate of transfusion and bleeding post operatively. The case series of 370 patients showed a 1% risk of deep vein thrombosis with no pulmonary emboli and 1 death due to an unrelated cause. There was a transfusion rate of 11% with 0.5% patients taken back to theatre for evacuation of haematomas. There were no reported adverse effects of Dabigatran. We argue that our modified protocol for this novel drug should be followed as it is both safe and effective for postoperative anticoagulation

Rivaroxaban is an oral anticoagulant which has the potential to replace subcutaneous Clexane in post operative prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism following knee replacement. Rivaroxaban has been shown to be at least equivalent to Enoxaparin in the prevention of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism with a similar rate of major bleeding. However, the morbidity associated with the new product has yet to be fully examined. Our own anecdotal evidence suggests that Rivaroxaban may be associated with poorer knee range of motion, and greater bruising and haemarthrosis. This pilot study aimed to compare these outcomes as well as knee pain and length of hospital stay in patients receiving Rivaroxaban and Enoxaparin following total knee replacement. A controlled before and after study with single blinding was performed. Patients in the ‘Before’ group were given Rivaroxaban (our current protocol). Patients treated in the “After’ group were subjected to our previous protocol (Enoxaparin). Patients were followed up to 6-weeks post surgery. Blinded assessors reviewed range of motion and wound outcomes using a photographic method. Swelling was measured using a standardized technique. Bleeding, pain and length of stay were prospectively recorded. Data analysis is due to be completed in April 2011. Complete results will be available after this time. Discussion: Rivaroxaban was introduced to lessen patient burden as oral administration is presumed to be more acceptable than self-injection of Enoxaparin. It is yet to be determined comprehensively whether the benefits of oral administration outweigh any associated risks. Surgeons must carefully consider the risks and benefits of their choice of venous thrombosis prophylaxis following total knee replacement

NICE technology appraisal guidance 157 suggests that the oral anticoagulation medication Dabigatran etexilate (Pradaxa®, Boehringer Ingelheim) can be used for the primary prevention of venous thromboembolic events (VTE's) in adult patients who have undergone elective total hip (THR) or knee replacement (TKR) surgery. The NICE guidance and the Pradaxa® Summary of Product characteristics (SPC) report that 13.8% of patients receiving recommended doses of Dabigatran experience adverse bleeding events. In the manufacturer's pivotal clinical trials, wound secretion accounted for 4.9% of patients treated with Dabigatran as compared to 3.0% treated with Enoxaparin. The aim of this audit was to assess the impact of Dabigatran on wound complications at a UK district general hospital and to quantify the effect on the postoperative discharge home support services provided by the award-winning South Warwickshire Accelerated Transfer Team (SWATT). We report our experience of Dabigatran use at Warwick Hospital from March 2009 to March 2010. Of the 788 lower limb arthroplasties performed, 681 patients (81.0%) were accepted for SWATT follow-up. Fifty-five (8.6%) of patients accepted by SWATT showed increased wound secretion for greater than 5 days. This included 12.7% of THR and 5.5% of TKR patients. Increased wound secretion resulted in 226 extra home visits by SWATT, at an extra cost of £23,104 (7.5% increase in SWATT budget). Twenty-six of the 55 patients had positive microbial growth when wound secretions were swabbed. Five patients were admitted for management of wound infections. Incidentally, there were 2 reported cases of DVT and PE. These were not in the increased wound secretion patients. In summary, Dabigatran at Warwick Hospital was associated with a higher than predicted incidence of surgical site morbidity, increased resource output and increased postoperative discharge costs. As a consequence, Dabigatran use has been reduced and other oral anticoagulants are being trialled

Background. Current UK NICE guidelines on the prevention of thromboembolism state that all patients undergoing elective Hip or Knee Replacement surgery should be offered combined mechanical and pharmacological VTE prophylaxis. Methods. The original audit was performed between October 1999 and January 2009, totaling 7,532 patients. Updated to the full 10 years, a total of 8,140 patients underwent hip or knee replacement surgery (revision and primary) in our unit. Using a targeted thromboprophylaxis policy 83% of patients received mechanical A-V foot pumps only until mobile. High risk patients (12%) received in addition LMWH or fondaparinux, with only very high risk patients continuing on chemical prophylaxis post-discharge. All data are collected and stored on our own joint registry database with patients being assessed pre-operatively to determine their level of VTE risk. Results. Overall DVT rate was 1%, PE rate 0.5% and fatal PE rate 0.06%. The rates were slightly higher in the targeted Chemical thromboprophylaxis group (DVT 1.6%, PE 0.95%, fatal PE 0.1%) as expected as these patients were identified as being high risk. 5% of patients failed to receive any prophylaxis and in these patients the rates were the lowest of all (DVT 0.8%, PE 0.3% and fatal PE 0%). All p-values were >0.05. These rates are similar to those published in recent trials involving the oral anticoagulants Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban, given to all patients, (RE-NOVATE, RECORD 1,2,3,4, RE-MOBILISE Trials) with all p values again > 0.05. Complications however were ten times less using a targeted approach. Conclusion. We recommend the use of a targeted approach, only chemically treating those patients who are at high risk for thromboembolism, along with a rapid recovery programme. This has not only been shown to be safe but cuts costs and has ten times fewer complications than treating all patients with both chemical and mechanical prophylaxis as suggested by NICE

This population-based study investigated the incidence and trends in venous thromboembolic disease after total hip and knee arthroplasty over a ten-year period. Death or readmission for venous thromboembolic disease up to two years after surgery for all patients in Scotland was the primary outcome. The incidence of venous thromboembolic disease, including fatal pulmonary embolism, three months after surgery was 2.27% for primary hip arthroplasty and 1.79% for total knee arthroplasty. The incidence of fatal pulmonary embolism within three months was 0.22% for total hip arthroplasty and 0.15% for total knee arthroplasty. The majority of events occurred after hospital discharge, with no apparent trend over the period. The data support current advice that prophylaxis should be continued for at least six weeks following surgery. Despite the increased use of policies for prophylaxis and earlier mobilisation, there has been no change in the incidence of venous thromboembolic disease.