Aims. Multiligament knee injuries (MLKI) are devastating injuries that can result in significant morbidity and time away from sport. There remains considerable variation in strategies employed for investigation, indications for operative intervention, outcome reporting, and rehabilitation following these injuries. At present no study has yet provided a comprehensive overview evaluating the extent, range, and overall summary of the published literature pertaining to MLKI. Our aim is to perform a methodologically rigorous scoping review, mapping the literature evaluating the diagnosis and management of MLKI. Methods. This scoping review will address three aims: firstly, to map the current extent and nature of evidence for diagnosis and management of MLKI; secondly, to summarize and disseminate existing research findings to practitioners; and thirdly, to highlight gaps in current literature. A three-step search strategy as described by accepted methodology will be employed to identify peer-reviewed literature including reviews, technical notes, opinion pieces, and original research. An initial limited search will be performed to determine suitable search terms, followed by an expanded search of four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science). Two reviewers will independently screen identified studies for final inclusion. Dissemination. We will map key concepts and evidence, and disseminate existing research findings to the wider orthopaedic and sports medicine community, through both peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed literature, and conference and in-person communications. We will highlight gaps in the current literature and determine future priorities for further research. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(11):894–897

Aims

The evidence base within trauma and orthopaedics has traditionally favoured quantitative research methodologies. Qualitative research can provide unique insights which illuminate patient experiences and perceptions of care. Qualitative methods reveal the subjective narratives of patients that are not captured by quantitative data, providing a more comprehensive understanding of patient-centred care. The aim of this study is to quantify the level of qualitative research within the orthopaedic literature.

Introduction. Meniscal injuries are very common cause of knee pain and resultant attendance to the orthopaedics or sports medicine clinics. The current protocol stands at clinical examination at first contact and establishing a diagnosis with clinical indicators like joint line tenderness, McMurray's, Apley's and weight-bearing test for meniscal pathology followed by MRI scan to confirm the diagnosis. Either surgical or conservative management follows this. We aim to assess clinical examination alone provide sufficient evidence for further management of meniscal injury and does a role of MRI scan exist to corroborate the findings. Methodology. We retrospectively studied 88 patients attending the sports medicine clinic for the duration 2004–2007 examined by senior clinical assessor. We investigated the co-relation of the clinical and MRI findings to validate if there exists an actual clinical justification to use MRI scan in every patient. We divided the data in further subsets of 57 patients in whom both clinical examination and MRI scan were performed and were validated by arthroscopy. The data obtained was analysed for parameters of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV] and negative predictive value [NPV]. Results. The comparison of clinical examination against MRI scans alone in 88 patients provided a accuracy of 81.81%, sensitivity of 95.77% and specificity of 23.52%. The assessment revealed that clinical examination yielded accuracy of 89.47%, sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 42 %, PPV of 92%, NPV of 60% while MRI scan was 87.70% accurate, 86% sensitive, with specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 57.14%. Conclusion. From the results yielded by the study we can conclude that in experienced hands the clinical examination is as robust as MRI scan for meniscal injury of knee and can negate the need for MRI scan to be performed in every painful knee with suspicious meniscal injury

Purpose: Although more than half of all medical graduates are now female, orthopaedics has experienced the least growth of all primary surgical fields in attracting female residency candidates. Our purpose was to identify ways to enhance female interest in orthopaedic surgery as a career. Method: The effect of exposure on interest in orthopaedics was studied prospectively for two years. Enrollment data regarding student demographics, interest, and exposure to orthopaedic, general, or other surgical subspecialties was obtained from two medical schools. At 6 month intervals, students were offered electronically-based orthopaedic literature, elective lectures, and were resurveyed for exposure and interest level. Univariate analysis was performed between demographics, background, exposure variables and interest levels. Change in exposure was further analyzed against change in interest with a multivariate logistic regression model constructed using significant associations along with gender. Results: 274 females and 73 male controls enrolled. Baseline increased interest in orthopaedics was correlated in a multivariate model with personal experiences as musculoskeletal patient and/or researcher, among others (p< 0.05). Interim enhanced exposure to orthopaedic web materials was significantly associated with increased interest, intent to enroll in an elective, and intent to apply for orthopaedics or sports medicine. Interestingly, no associations with other surgical specialties were found, and gender was not a significant independent determinant of interest and intent in this model. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that interest among female medical students can be significantly increased by enhancing exposure to orthopaedic subject matter during medical school. Early exposure may prove a critical tool in recruiting more women into orthopaedic surgery, which will be necessary to meet the anticipated demands of the growing orthopaedic patient population

Background: The Achilles tendon is the strongest and thickest tendon in the human body, it is very commonly injured with significant clinical implications. The treatment of Achilles tendon rupture is a matter of controversy in orthopedics and sports medicine. Surgical repair compared with conservative treatment is debated constantly in the literature, without a conclusive decision. The diagnosis of Achilles tendon rupture is based usually on clinical examination, and may be reinforced by ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging. The present study has been conducted in order to determine whether an ultrasound examination performed at the time of injury could be useful in deciding how to treat the patient. Patients: Over a period of 5 years we treated 26 patients who had a clinical presentation of ruptured Achilles tendon with ultrasound diagnosis of either a partial tear or a full tear. Patients who were diagnosed by ultrasound as having a full tendon tear were operated on, and were not included in this study. Eight patients had partial tear of the tendon, six had a tear of the musculotendinous region, and twelve had a proximal tear. All patients were treated by means of a cast or a dressing, with limitation of weight bearing. The follow-up period ranged between six months to three years after the injury, and included up-to-date functional evaluation. Results: Eighteen patients were available for evaluation. Excellent functional results were reported by five patients, twelve patients reported good results, and one patient complained of a bad result. None of our patients needed delayed surgery, and only one suffered from re-rupture of the tendon during his rehabilitation, and was treated conservatively with good results. No correlation was found between the location of the tear and the functional results. Conclusions: 1. Ultrasound is an important and accurate tool in the diagnosis of Achilles tendon tear and is helpful in choosing the appropriate treatment. 2. Partial tear of Achilles tendon is not an indication for operative treatment, even when the clinical examination (Thompson test) is positive. The outcome of conservative treatment in this situation is as good or even better than surgical treatment

Australia is a foundation member of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association—thus, recognising our geographical position in the most rapidly advancing region in the world. It is a serious mistake to think of Asia as ‘third world’. Research, education and surgical techniques are at the forefront of modern technology. Australia has to be a part of this ‘learn and teach’ movement. We have much to gain through exchange and travelling fellowships; paediatric, spinal, trauma and arthroplasty fellowships are available. The Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Travelling Fellowship is co-ordinated with corresponding organisations in Europe, North America and South America and previous travelling fellows become part of the influential Magellan Society. APOA has many sections (knee, hip, hand, spine, trauma, infection, sports medicine and paediatrics), with each having regular Congresses. Join APOA and attend the Triennial Congress in Taipei November 2010 and be impressed at the level of research

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common cause of hip pain in the young adult. Uncertainty regarding surgical indications, outcome assessment, management preferences and perceptions of the literature exist. We conducted a large international survey assessing the perceptions and demographics of orthopaedic surgeons regarding FAI. A survey was developed using previous literature, focus groups and a sample-to-redundancy strategy. The survey contained forty-six questions and was emailed to national orthopaedic associations and orthopaedic sports medicine societies for member responses. Members were contacted on multiple occasions to increase response rates. Nine hundred orthopaedic surgeons from twenty national and international organisations completed the survey. Surgeons responded across 6 continents, 58.2 % from developed nations with 35.4 % having sports fellowship training. North American and European surgeons reported significantly greater exposure to hip arthroscopy during residency and fellowships in comparison to international respondents (48.0% vs. 44.5% vs. 25.6% respectively; p<0.001). Surgeons performing a higher volume of FAI surgery (over 100 cases per year) were significantly more likely to have practiced for more than 20 years (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.01 to 3.63), be practicing at an academic hospital (OR 2.25; 95% CI 1.22 to 4.15), and have formal arthroscopy training (OR 46.17; 95% CI 20.28 to 105.15). High volume surgeons were over two-fold more likely to practice in North America and Europe (OR 2.26; 95% CI: 1.08 to 4.72). The exponential rise in the diagnosis and surgical management for FAI appears to be driven largely by experienced surgeons in developed nations. Our analysis suggests that although FAI management is early in the innovation cycle we are at a tipping point towards wider uptake and utilisation. The results of this survey will help guide further research and study

Purpose: Little evidence exists to guide rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). It is unclear how new repair techniques may affect postoperative protocols. Our purpose was to determine current practices of members of the Arthroscopy Association of North America (AANA) and the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM.) Our hypothesis was that wide variation would exist in the postoperative rehabilitation following ARCR and that accelerated protocols would commonly be prescribed after double row ARCR. Method: A 28 question web-based survey was sent to all active members of AANA and AOSSM via email addresses listed in the specialty society directory. Non-responders were reminded by 2 additional invitations. Results were tabulated and responses reported as a percentage of respondents. Results: The response rate was 37.7% (797/2112). Most commonly, respondents use a post-operative abduction sling (56.2%) and begin physical therapy within the first 2 weeks (42.1%.) Passive ROM is initiated within 2 weeks (74.1%), active ROM after 6 weeks (55.3%) and strengthening after 6 weeks (64.4%). Unrestricted activities are permitted at 5 months (41.2%.) 85.2% of respondents alter rehabilitation based upon tear size. Protocols were altered based upon tissue quality (86.9%), involvement of subscapularis (68.7%) or biceps tendon (65.2%) but not for workers compensation status (97.1%), smoking (71.5%) or patient age (70.3%.) 81.1% had performed double row rotator cuff repairs; however 95.2% of those do not alter their postoperative protocol based upon repair configuration. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate wide variation among respondents with regards to immobilization, ROM and return to activity. The majority had performed double row ARCR, however 95.2% of these do not alter their postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing double row repair

Aims

The primary aim of this prospective, multicentre study is to describe the rates of returning to golf following hip, knee, ankle, and shoulder arthroplasty in an active golfing population. Secondary aims will include determining the timing of return to golf, changes in ability, handicap, and mobility, and assessing joint-specific and health-related outcomes following surgery.

Aims

The aim of this study was to establish consensus statements on medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, anteromedialization tibial tubercle osteotomy, trochleoplasty, and rehabilitation and return to sporting activity in patients with patellar instability, using the modified Delphi process.

Aims

Orthopaedic surgery requires grafts with sufficient mechanical strength. For this purpose, decellularized tissue is an available option that lacks the complications of autologous tissue. However, it is not widely used in orthopaedic surgeries. This study investigated clinical trials of the use of decellularized tissue grafts in orthopaedic surgery.