Introduction. The use of technology, such as navigation and robotic systems, may improve the accuracy of component positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA) but its impact on patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) remains unclear. This study aims to identify the association between intraoperative use of technology and patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) in patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent primary THA between 2016 and 2020 and answered a post-operative PROM questionnaire. Patients were separated into three groups depending on the technology utilized intraoperatively: navigation, robotics, or no technology (i.e. manual THA. The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR) were collected at various time points (FJS: 3m, 1y, and 2y; HOOS, JR: pre-operatively, 3m, and 1y). Demographic differences were assessed with chi-square and ANOVA. Mean scores between all groups were compared using univariate ANCOVA, controlling for observed demographic differences. Results. Of the 1,960 cases included, 896 navigation, 135 robotics, and 929 manual. There was a significant statistical difference in one-year HOOS, JR scores (85.23 vs. 85.95 vs. 86.76; p=0.014) and two-year FJS-12 scores (64.72 vs. 73.35 vs. 74.63; p=0.004) between the three groups. However, they did not exceed the mean clinically important difference (MCID) at any time period. Short and long-term PROMs significantly differed between navigation and manually performed cases (FJS 3m: p=0.047; FJS 2y: p=0.001; HOOS, JR 1y: p=0.004). Two-year FJS-12 scores statistically differed between navigation and robotics (p=0.038). There was no statistical difference in either FJS-12 or HOOS, JR scores between robotics and manual THA groups at all time points (FJS 3m:p=0.076, 1y:p=0.225, 2y:p=0.793; HOOS, JR preop:p=0.872, 3m:p=0.644, 1y:p=0.531). Conclusion. Statistical differences observed between all modalities are not likely to be clinically meaningful with regards to early patient reported outcomes. While intraoperative use of technology may improve the accuracy of implant placement, these modalities have not necessarily translated into improved early reported functional outcomes

Introduction. By utilising the inherent variability achievable with circular frames, surgeons can manage a wide spectrum of complex injuries, and can deal with deformity at multiple levels, in multiple planes. The aim of this study was to assess functional outcomes utilising patients reported outcome measures (PROMs) of patients being treated with circular (Ilizarov) frame fixation for complex lower limb injuries and assess these results in conjunction with the observed postoperative alignment of the patients’ limbs. Materials & Methods. Cases were identified using a prospectively collected database of adult patients presenting between July 2018 and August 2021. Functional outcomes were assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ5D5L), the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale (LKSS), the Olerud-Molendar Ankle Score (OMAS), and the Tegner Activity Scale (TAS). Postoperative radiographs were analysed for fracture union and to quantify malunion (as described in Dror Paleys Principles of Deformity Correction). Results. The mean AOFAS, EQ5D5L, LKSS and OMAS scores showed an initial drop from pre-op to early time points and then steady increase over the early, mid, late and frame-off time points, with a resultant score higher than pre-op. Malunion was found in 35 (41.7%) patients, 7 patients had a malunion within 5 degrees of normal, 15 from 5–10 degrees of normal, 12 from 10–15 degrees of normal and 2 out with 15 degrees of normal. Conclusions. Circular frame fixation is an attractive option in complex lower limb trauma where alternative fixation methods are unsuitable. Whilst post-operative success to the surgeon might be determined radiographically, patient reported outcomes give a functionally important, objective measure of the success of the surgery to the patient

Introduction. Open fractures are complex injuries associated with substantial morbidity. These injuries are associated with harm to both physical and emotional health as well as preclusion of work, social, and leisure activities. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and health related quality of life are critical indicators of successful rehabilitation following open fracture treatment. This study aimed to measure the PROMs for patients with open lower limb fractures and investigate the relationship with injury severity. Materials & Methods. A retrospective cohort study was performed at a single major trauma centre in the UK. All adult patients with an open lower limb fracture were eligible for inclusion. Patients were identified through a search of a local Open Fracture Database. Epidemiological, clinical, and fracture classification data were obtained by reviewing case notes. Lower Extremity Function Scale (LEFS) and EQ5-D were used as PROMs and measured by a postal questionnaire, alongside return to employment data. Results. A total of 73 patients responded to the questionnaire. Median LEFS was 42 (IQR 26.5 – 59.5), and median EQ5-D was 0.69 (IQR 0.48 – 0.89). There was no significant association between open fracture classification and PROMs. Over 40% of patients reported a change in employment due to their injury. Those who changed jobs had a statistically significant reduction in the EQ5-D of 0.12 (p = 0.021); no significant difference existed in LEFS. Conclusions. This study demonstrates the devastating functional impact of open fractures. This cohort of open injuries reported lower functional and quality-of-life measures compared to population norms. Injury classification was not a valuable predictor of PROMs. A substantial proportion of patients were forced to change employment due to their injury, and these patients reported a significantly lower quality of life. Further work is required to understand the factors contributing to open fracture PROMs

Cryocompression therapy is a non-invasive and non-pharmacological modality used in managing acute post-operative inflammation and pain. A prospective, randomised controlled trial (RCT) was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of a post-operative cryocompression protocol using the Game Ready™ (GR) device versus usual care on recovery following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A single centre RCT was conducted with 70 TKAs (68 patients) randomised to a 2-week intervention period consisting of treatment with GR cryocompression (n=33, 33.3% males) or a usual care protocol of ice with static compression using tubigrip (n=35, 54.3% males). Knee range of movement (ROM) (flexion and extension), a visual analogue pain score (VAS) and limb circumference were documented at day 1, 2 and 14, as well as 6 and 12 weeks post-surgery. ROM was also recorded at day 90, while medication use and length of hospital stay were documented. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the KOOS and patient satisfaction questionnaire were employed. The GR group demonstrated 2.3° more (p=0.05) knee extension ROM overall, as well as 2. 8° more at day 1 (p=0.048), 3.8° at day 14 (p=0.007) and 5.4° at 3 months (p=0.017). There were no group differences (p>0.05) observed in pain (VAS), flexion ROM, limb circumference, opioid use or other PROMs. Across the full cohort, higher pain levels resulted in increased opioid intake (p=0.002), older patients used significantly less opioids (p<0.001) and males reported significantly less pain (VAS) than females (p=0.048). Using GR following TKA is a safe, non-invasive tool that can be used to aid in the post-operative recovery period. Patients using the GR cryocompression device gained significantly more extension ROM compared to the conventional ice with compression group, despite no other group differences

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are typically used to assess longitudinal change in pain and function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The Patient's Knee Implant Performance (PKIP) score was developed to evaluate outcomes more broadly including function, stability, confidence, and satisfaction. Although validated in patients having a primary TKA, the PKIP has not been evaluated as an outcome measure for patients having revision TKA. This study examined patient outcomes at one year following primary and revision TKA measured using the PKIP, compared to Oxford Knee Scores. A retrospective analysis of pre-operative and one-year post-operative outcomes was completed for 39 patients (21 female) who had primary (n=27) or revision (n=12) TKA with a single surgeon between 2017 and 2020. The mean age was 69.2±7.4 years, and mean weight 87.4± 5.1kg. The change over time and correlation between the self-reported outcome measures was evaluated. There was a significant improvement in the PKIP overall score at the 12-month follow-up (32± 13 v 69± 15, p= <0.001), with no significant difference between groups (3.3 points, p=0.50). Among the PKIP sub-scores, there was a significant improvement in knee confidence (3.5±2 vs 7.7±2; p<0.001), stability (3.4±2 vs 7.4±3; p<0.001) and satisfaction (2.5±1.7 vs 6.6±3, p<0.001). Between group differences in PKIP sub-scores one year after surgery were small and non-significant. For all patients, the OKS and PKIP scores were moderately correlated before surgery (r=0.64, p=<0.05), and at 1 year after surgery (r=0.61, p= <0.001). Significant improvements in knee confidence, stability, and satisfaction one year after TKA were identified from the PKIP responses, with no significant difference between primary and revision surgery. The moderate correlation with the OKS suggests these questionnaires measure difference constructs and may provide complementary outcome information in this patient cohort

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective treatment for symptomatic hip osteoarthritis (OA). While computer-navigation technologies in total knee arthroplasty show survivorship advantages and are widely used, comparable applications within THA show far lower utilisation. Using national registry data, this study compared patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients who underwent THA with and without computer navigation. Data from Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) PROMs program included all primary THA procedures performed for OA up to 31 December 2020. Procedures using the Intellijoint HIP® navigation system were identified and compared to procedures using other computer navigation systems or conventional instrumentation only. Changes in PROM scores between pre-operative and 6-month post-operative time points were analysed using multiple regression model, adjusting for pre-operative score, patient age, gender, ASA score, BMI, surgical approach, and hospital type. There were 65 primary THA procedures that used the Intellijoint HIP® system, 90 procedures used other types of computer navigation, and the remaining 5,284 primary THA procedures used conventional instrumentation. The estimated mean changes in the EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) score and Oxford Hip score did not differ significantly when Intellijoint® was compared to conventional instruments (estimated differences of 2.4, 95% CI [-1.7, 6.5], p = 0.245, and −0.5, 95% CI [-2.5, 1.4], p = 0.592, respectively). The proportion of patients who were satisfied with their procedure was also similar when Intellijoint® was compared to conventional instruments (rate ratio 1.06, 95% CI [0.97, 1.16], p = 0.227). The preliminary data demonstrate no significant difference in PROMs when comparing the Intellijoint HIP® THA navigation system with both other navigation systems and conventional instrumentation for primary THAs performed for OA. Level of evidence: III (National registry analysis)

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has high rates of patient satisfaction; however patient expectations for recreational and sporting activities are not always met. Our study aimed to identify preoperative factors that predict whether patient expectations for sporting or recreational activity are met 12 months following THA. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected prospectively from 2015-2018 at one private hospital in Sydney. Age, gender, postcode, weight, and height were recorded preoperatively. Included participants underwent primary THA by one of the investigating surgeons. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed with an expectation fulfilment score used as the primary outcome variable. Preoperative predictor variables included: age, gender, BMI, Socio-economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Oxford Hip Score, Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, EQ-5D-5L and EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS). 1019 participants were eligible and included. 13% reported that preoperative expectations of sport or recreation were not met at 12 months. Younger age, lower preoperative EQ VAS, and higher BMI were associated with failed expectations on multivariable analysis. Odds of failed expectations increased by 2% for every one year younger in age (OR= 0.98, 95% CI = 0.96 to 1.00, p=.048), by 2% for every one point lower on EQ VAS (OR=0.98, 95% CI = 0.98 to 0.99, p=.002), and by 4% for every one-point increase in BMI (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.09, p=.042). Failure to have expectations met for sporting or recreational activity was associated with younger age, poorer general health, and high BMI. With a rise in younger patients who likely have higher physical demands, a tailored preoperative education is preferable to generic models to better manage patient expectations. Younger age, higher BMI, and poorer health may predict unmet expectations for sport and recreation after THA. Tailored education in these groups should be considered

Source of the study: University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand and University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are predictors of knee arthroplasty revision. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is effective for patients with the correct indications, however has higher revision rates than total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Different revision thresholds for the procedures have been postulated. Our aims were to investigate: 1) if PROMs could predict knee arthroplasty revision within two years of the score at six months, five years and ten years follow-up, and 2) if revision ‘thresholds’ differed between TKA and UKA. All TKAs and UKAs captured by the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1999 and 2019 with at least one OKS response at six months (TKA n=27,708, UKA n=8,415), five years (TKA n=11,519, UKA n=3,365) or ten years (TKA n=6,311, UKA n=1,744) were included. were propensity-score matched 2:1 with UKAs for comparison of revision thresholds. Logistic regression indicated that for every one-unit decrease in OKS, the odds of TKA and UKA revision decreased by 10% and 11% at six months, 10% and 12% at five years and 9% and 5% at ten years. Fewer TKA patients with ‘poor’ outcomes (≤25) subsequently underwent revision compared with UKA at six months (5.1% vs. 19.6%, p<0.001), five years (4.3% vs. 12.5%, p<0.001) and ten years (6.4%vs. 15.0%, p=0.02). Compared with TKA, UKA patients were 2.5 times more likely to undergo revision for ‘unknown’ reasons, bearing dislocations and disease progression. The OKS is a strong predictor of subsequent knee arthroplasty revision within two years of the score from early to late term. A lower revision threshold was found with UKA when compared with a matched TKA cohort. Higher revision rates of UKA are associated with both lower clinical thresholds for revision and additional modes of UKA failure

Passive smartphone-based apps are becoming more common for measuring patient progress after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Optimum activity levels during early TKA recovery haven't been well documented. This study investigated correlations between step-count and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and how demographics impact step-count preoperatively and during early post-operative recovery. Smartphone capture step-count data from 357 TKA patients was retrospectively reviewed. Mean age was 68±8years. 61% were female. Mean BMI was 31±6kg/m2. Mean daily step count was calculated over three time-windows: 60 days prior to surgery (preop), 5-6 weeks postop (6wk), and 11-12 weeks postop (12wk). Linear correlations between step-count and KOOS12-function and UCLA activity scores were performed. Patients were separated into three step-count levels: low (<1500steps/day), medium (1500-4000steps/day), and high (>4000steps/day). Age >65years, BMI >30kg/m2, and sex were used for demographic comparisons. Student's t-tests determined significant differences in mean step-counts between demographic groups, and in mean PROMs between step-count groups. UCLA correlated with step-count at all time-windows (p<0.01). KOOS12-Function correlated with step-count at 6wk and 12wk (p<0.05). High step-count individuals had improved PROMs compared to low step-count individuals preoperatively (UCLA: ∆1.4 [p<0.001], KOOS12-Function: ∆7.3 [p<0.05]), at 6wk (UCLA: ∆1 [p<0.01], KOOS12-Function: ∆7 [p<0.05]), and at 12wk (UCLA: ∆0.8 [p<0.05], KOOS12-Function: ∆6.5 [p<0.05]). Younger patients had greater step-count preoperatively (3.8±3.0k vs. 2.5±2.3k, p<0.01), at 6wk (3.1±2.9k vs. 2.2±2.3k, p<0.05) and at 12wk (3.9±2.6k vs. 2.8±2.6k, p<0.01). Males had greater step-count preoperatively (3.7±2.6k vs. 2.5±2.6k, p<0.001), at 6wk (3.6±2.6k vs. 1.9±2.4k, p<0.001), and at 12wk (3.9±2.3 vs. 2.8±2.8k, p<0.01). No differences in step-count were observed between low and high BMI patients at any timepoint. High step count led to improved PROMs scores compared to low step-count. Early post-operative step-count was significantly impacted by age and sex. Generic recovery profiles may not be appropriate across a diverse population

The Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) is a patient-reported disease-specific quality of life (QOL) outcome measure used to assess patients with recurrent lateral patellofemoral instability (LPI) both pre- and post-operatively. The purpose of this study was to compare the BPII 2.0 to four other relevant patient reported outcome measures (PROMs): the Tampa Scale-11 for kinesiophobia (TSK-11), the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS), a general QOL (EQ-5D-5L), and a return to sport index (ACL-RSI). This concurrent validation sought to compare and correlate the BPII 2.0 with these other measures of physical, psychological, and emotional health. The psychological and emotional status of patients can impact recovery and rehabilitation, and therefore a disease-specific PROM may be unable to consistently identify patients who would benefit from interventions encompassing a holistic and person-focused approach in addition to disease-specific treatment. One hundred and ten patients with recurrent lateral patellofemoral instability (LPI) were assessed at a tertiary orthopaedic practice between January and October 2021. Patients were consented into the study and asked to complete five questionnaires: the BPII 2.0, TSK-11, PCS, EQ-5D-5L, and the ACL-RSI at their initial orthopaedic consultation. Descriptive demographic statistics were collected for all patients. A Pearson's r correlation coefficient was employed to examine the relationships between the five PROMs. These analyses were computed using SPSS 28.0 © (IBM Corporation, 2021). One hundred and ten patients with a mean age of 25.7 (SD = 9.8) completed the five PROMs. There were 29 males (26.3%) and 81 females (73.6%) involving 50% symptomatic left knees and 50% symptomatic right knees. The mean age of the first dislocation was 15.4 years (SD = 7.3; 1-6) and the mean BMI was 26.5 (SD = 7.3; range = 12.5-52.6) The results of the Pearson's r correlation coefficient demonstrated that the BPII 2.0 was statistically significantly related to all of the assessed PROM's (p. There was significant correlation evident between the BPII 2.0 and the four other PROMs assessed in this study. The BPII 2.0 does not explicitly measure kinesiophobia or pain catastrophizing, however, the significant statistical relationship of the TSK-11 and PCS to the BPII 2.0 suggests that this information is being captured and reflected. The preliminary results of this concurrent validation suggest that the pre-operative data may offer predictive validity. Future research will explore the ability of the BPII 2.0 to predict patient quality of life following surgery

Untreated clubfoot results in serious disability, but mild to moderate residual deformities can still cause functional limitations and pain. Measuring the impact of clubfoot deformities on children's wellbeing is challenging. There is little literature discussing the variability in outcomes and implications of clubfoot based on where geographically the child resides. Although the use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) is steadily growing in pediatric orthopaedics, few studies on clubfoot have incorporated them. The most widely used PROM for pediatric foot and ankle pathology is the Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire for Children (OXFAQ-C) that include a physical, school and play, emotional and shoe wear domains. The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity and regional differences in scores of the OXFAQ-C questionnaire to identify functional disability in children with clubfoot in India and Canada. This is a retrospective cohort study of children in Indian and Canadian clubfoot registries aged 5-16 years who completed >1 parent or child OXFAQ-C. The OXFAQ-C was administered once in 01/2020 to all patients in the Indian registry, and prospectively between 06/2019 and 03/2021 at initial visit, 3, 6, 12 months post-intervention, then annually for the Canadian patients. Demographic, clubfoot, and treatment data were compared to OXFAQ-C domain scores. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were performed. Parent-child concordance was evaluated with Pearson's Coefficient of Correlation (PCC). The cohort had 361 patients (253 from India, 108 from Canada). Non-idiopathic clubfoot occurred in 15% of children in India and 5% in Canada, and bilateral in 53% in India and 50% in Canada. Tenotomy rate was 75% in India and 62% in Canada. Median age at presentation was 3 months in India and 1 month in Canada. Mean Pirani score at presentation and number of Ponseti casts were 4.9 and 6.1 in India and 5.3 and 5.7 in Canada, respectively. Parents reported lower scores in all domains the older the child was at presentation (p Canadians scored significantly lower for all domains (p < 0 .001), with the difference being larger for child-reported scores. The greatest difference was for physical domain. Canadian parents on average scored their child 6.21 points lower than Indian parents, and Canadian children scored a mean of 7.57 lower than Indian children. OXFAQ-C scores differed significantly between Indian and Canadian children despite similar demographic and clubfoot characteristics. Younger age at presentation and tenotomy may improve OXFAQ-C scores in childhood. Parent-child concordance was strong in this population. The OXFAQ-C is an adequate tool to assess functional outcomes of children with clubfeet. Cultural validation of patient reported outcome tools is critical

One in five patients remain unsatisfied due to ongoing pain and impaired mobility following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is important if surgeons can pre-operatively identify which patients may be at risk for poor outcomes after TKA. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is an association between pre-operative measures and post-operative outcomes in patients who underwent TKA. This study included 28 patients (female = 12 / male = 16, age = 63.6 ± 6.9, BMI = 29.9 ± 7.4 kg/m2) with knee osteoarthritis who were scheduled to undergo TKA. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon (GD), and a subvastus approach was performed for all patients. Patients visited the gait lab within one-month of surgery and 12 months following surgery. At the gait lab, patients completed the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), a timed up and go (TUG), and walking task. Variables of interest included the five KOOS sub-scores (symptoms, pain, activities of daily living, sport & recreation, and quality of life), completion time for the TUG, walking speed, and peak knee biomechanics variables (flexion angle, abduction moment, power absorption). A Pearson's product-moment correlation was run to assess the relationship between pre-operative measures and post-operative outcomes in the TKA patients. Preliminary analyses showed the relationship to be linear with all variables normally distributed, as assessed by Shapiro-Wilk's test (p > .05), and there were no outliers. There were no statistically significant correlations between any of the pre-operative KOOS sub-scores and any of the post-operative biomechanical outcomes. Pre-operative TUG time had a statistically significant, moderate positive correlation with post-operative peak knee abduction moments [r(14) = .597, p < .001] and peak knee power absorption [r(14) = .498, p = .007], with pre-operative TUG time explaining 36% of the variability in peak knee abduction moment and 25% of the variability in peak knee power absorption. Pre-operative walking speed had a statistically significant, moderate negative correlation with post-operative peak knee abduction moments [r(14) = -.558, p = .002] and peak knee power absorption [r(14) = -.548, p = .003], with pre-operative walking speed explaining 31% of the variability in peak knee abduction moment and 30% of the variability in peak knee power absorption. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), such as the KOOS, do indicate the TKA is generally successful at relieving pain and show an overall improvement. However, their pre-operative values do not correlate with any biomechanical indicators of post-operative success, such as peak knee abduction moment and knee power. Shorter pre-operative TUG times and faster pre-operative walking speeds were correlated with improved post-operative biomechanical outcomes. These are simple tasks surgeons can implement into their clinics to evaluate their patients. Future research should expand these findings to a larger sample size and to determine if other factors, such as surgical approach or implant design, improves patient outcomes

Introduction. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used to understand the impact of lower limb reconstruction on patient's quality of life (QOL). Existing measures have not been developed to specifically capture patient experiences amongst adults with lower limb conditions that require reconstruction surgery. This systematic review of qualitative studies (qualitative evidence synthesis) aimed to identify what is important to these patients. Materials and Methods. MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO and Cinahl were searched from inception until November 2020. Studies were included if they employed qualitative research methods, involved patients requiring, undergoing or following lower limb reconstruction and explored patients' experiences of care, treatment, recovery and QOL. Mixed methods/population studies that did not separate the findings from each group and studies not in English were excluded. Included studies were analysed using thematic synthesis. The review followed the methodological framework published by the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group for qualitative evidence syntheses. Results. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Thematic synthesis identified two overarching themes:(1) areas of living key to QOL for lower limb reconstruction patients, with sub-themes: pain, daily functioning and lifestyle, identity, income and emotional wellbeing and (2) moving towards a new normal, with sub-themes: support, the ability to adapt and adjust and the ability to move forwards. The impact of lower limb reconstruction on QOL and recovery is complex and is influenced by a range of inter-related factors, which will affect patients to varying degrees depending on individual circumstances. Conclusions. The impact of lower limb reconstruction on patients' QOL is complex, may change over time and is strongly linked to their recovery. This review was conducted as part of the wider ‘PROLLIT' study, which will develop a conceptual framework to identify what outcomes are important to patients and should be included in a PROM. We will then map our conceptual framework onto existing PROMS to establish whether our identified factors are captured by current PROMS. Depending on the outcome of this work, a new PROM for patients following lower limb reconstruction may be developed

Surgical treatment options for Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) includes both surgical dislocation and hip arthroscopy techniques. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the survivorship of arthroscopies (scope) and surgical dislocations (SD) at minimum 5-year follow-up. The secondary aim was to describe differences in functional outcomes between the 2 groups. This was a retrospective, single surgeon, consecutive, case-series from a large tertiary care centre. We evaluated all surgeries that were performed between 2005 and 2011. Our institutional database was queried for any patient undergoing surgery for FAI (pincer (n=23), cam (n=306), or mixed (n=103) types). Patients with childhood pathologies i.e. Legg Calve Perthes and slipped capital femoral epiphysis were excluded. This resulted in 221 hips (169 males, 52 females) who underwent either SD (94, 42.5%) or scope (127, 57.5%). A manual chart review was completed to identify patients who sustained a complication, underwent revision surgery or progressed to a total hip arthroplasty (THA). In addition, we reviewed prospectively collected patient reported outcome measure (PROMs) using (SF12, HOOS, and UCLA). Survivorship outcome was described for the whole cohort and compared between the 2 surgical groups. PROMs between groups were compared using The Mann-Whitney U test and the survival between groups was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier Analysis and the Log-Rank Mantel Cox test. All analyses were performed in SPSS (IBM, v. 26.0). The cohort included 110 SDs and 320 arthroscopies. The mean age of the whole cohort was 34±10; patients in the SD group (32±9) were younger compared to the arthroscopy group (39±10) (p<0.0001). There were 16 post-operative complications (similar between groups) and 77 re-operations (more common in the SD group (n=49) due to symptomatic metal work (n=34)). The overall 10-year survival was 91±3%. Survivorship was superior in the arthroscopy group at both 5- (96% (95%CI: 93 – 100)) and 8- years 94% (95%CI: 90 – 99%) compared to the SD Group (5-yr: 90% (95%CI: 83 – 98); 8-yr: 84% (95%CI:75 – 93)) (p=0.003) (Figure 1). On average HOOS improved from 54±19 to 68±22 and WOMAC from 65±22 to 75±22. The improvement in PROMs were similar between the 2 groups. We report very good long-term joint preservation for the treatment of FAI, which is similar to those reported in hip dysplasia. In addition, we report satisfactory improvement in function following such treatment. The differences reported in joint survival likely reflect selection biases from the treating surgeon; more complex cases and those associated with more complex anatomy were more likely to have been offered a SD in order to address the pathology with greater ease and hence the inferior joint preservation identified in this group. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly

Management of acetabular fractures in the elderly population remains somewhat controversial in regards to when to consider is open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) versus acute primary total hip. study aims to (1) describe outcome of this complex problem and investigate predictors of successful outcome. This retrospective study analyzes all acetabular fractures in patients over the age of 60, managed by ORIF at a tertiary trauma care centre between 2007 and 2018 with a minimum follow up of one year. Of the 117 patients reviewed, 85 patients undergoing ORIF for treatment of their acetabular fracture were included in the analysis. The remainder were excluded based management option including acute ORIF with THA (n=10), two-stage ORIF (n=2), external fixator only (n=1), acute THA (n=1), and conservative management (n=1). The remainder were excluded based on inaccessible medical records (n=6), mislabelled diagnosis (n=6), associated femoral injuries (n=4), acetabular fracture following hemiarthroplasty (n=1). The mean age of the cohort is 70±7 years old with 74% (n=62) of patients being male. Data collected included: demographics, mechanism of injury, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), ASA Grade, smoking status and reoperations. Pre-Operative Radiographs were analyzed to determine the Judet and Letournel fracture pattern, presence of comminution and posterior wall marginal impaction. Postoperative radiographs were used to determine Matta Grade of Reduction. Outcome measures included morbidity-, mortality- rates, joint survival, radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) at follow-up. A poor outcome in ORIF was defined as one of the following: 1) conversion to THA or 2) the presence of radiographic OA, combined with an OHS less than 34 (findings consistent with a hip that would benefit from a hip replacement). The data was analyzed step-wise to create a regression model predictive of outcome following ORIF. Following ORIF, 31% (n=26) of the cohort had anatomic reduction, while 64% (n=54) had imperfect or poor reduction. 4 patients did not have adequate postoperative radiographs to assess the reduction. 31 of 84 patients undergoing ORIF had a complication of which 22.6% (n=19) required reoperation. The most common reason being conversion to THA (n=14), which occurred an average of 1.6±1.9 years post-ORIF. The remainder required reoperation for infection (n=5). Including those converted to THA, 43% (n=36) developed radiographic OA following acetabular fracture management. The mean OHS in patients undergoing ORIF was 36 ± 10; 13(16%) had an OHS less than 34. The results of the logistic regression demonstrate that Matta grade of reduction (p=0.017), to be predictive of a poor outcome in acetabular fracture management. With non-anatomic alignment following fixation, patients had a 3 times greater risk of a poor outcome. No other variables were found to be predictive of ORIF outcome. The ability to achieve anatomic reduction of fracture fragments as determined by the Matta grade, is predictive of the ability to retain the native hip with acceptable outcome following acetabular fracture in the elderly. Further research must be conducted to determine predictors of adequate reduction in order to identify candidates for ORIF

Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (OMUKR) is a well-established treatment option for isolated medial compartment arthritis, with good patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). We present our results of the Oxford Domed Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (ODLUKR) to establish if patients benefit as much as with OMUKR. Retrospective review of prospectively collected data of a single surgeon series of consecutive UKR from 2007 to 2014 were collated with a minimum 2 years follow-up. PROMs data were collected using pre- and post-operative Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) (best score of 48). One hundred and twenty-eight OMUKR and 27 ODLUKR were performed in the study period. There was no significant difference in the age at time of surgery, but there were significantly more women in the ODLUKR group (74% vs 53%). There was no significant difference in pre-op OKS between the groups (OMUKR = 16/48; ODLUKR = 20/48), or the improvement in OKS post-op (OMUKR = 19 points; ODLUKR = 17 points). One ODLUKR was revised to Total Knee Replacement (TKR) for pain. There were three (11.1%) bearing dislocations, which were treated with thicker bearing exchange, with no subsequent problems. There were no bearing dislocations in the OMUKR. Four OMUKR were revised to TKR due to pain. The overall implant survivorship was 96.3% for ODLUKR and 96.9% for OMUKR. ODLUKR is a good treatment option for isolated lateral compartment arthritis and gives results equivalent to OMUKR. There is, however, an increased risk of bearing dislocation so should be performed by a high volume UKR surgeon

Background. Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) provides patients with significant improvements in quality of life. Subjective patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are traditionally used to measure preoperative functional status and postoperative outcomes. However, there are limitations to PROMs. In particular, they provide virtually no functional information in the first 3 weeks after surgery, which could be used to guide the patient's recovery. Newly available wearable electronic sensors make it possible to: 1) measure important functional outcomes following TKA; 2) guide the patient's physical therapy (PT); and 3) provide real-time functional and clinical information to the provider. Compliance with PT after TKA is a challenge. Patients cite time, transportation, and cost as deterrents to PT appointments. However, an intensive PT program is essential in TKA. Surface sensor devices may be able to increase PT compliance by guiding patients through exercises at home. Additionally, these devices can transmit PT progress in real-time to the providers, allowing them to monitor and assist the patient's recovery. Our study investigates the feasibility of using a surface sensor device (TracPatch™) on patients following TKA. We sought to answer the following questions: 1) Will patients tolerate the device; 2) Will patients comply with device instructions; 3) Will patients be able to use the smart phone application; 4) Will the device collect, transmit, and store data as it was designed? We believe these fundamental questions must be answered as we enter the era of personal sensor-measured functional outcomes. Methods. 20 patients undergoing primary, unilateral TKA were enrolled in this IRB approved study. At the pre-surgical visit, patients were given instructions for the device and smart phone application. Each patient used the device in the week prior to surgery, and data was collected. The device was again applied in the operating room. For 3 weeks post-operatively, the device collected functional data, along with WOMAC, OKS, KSS, PROMIS, and VAS pain scores. A satisfaction survey was collected on the device. Results. The study results emphasize the importance of clear device instructions. Using the sensor and phone application prior to surgery was very helpful. The device was surprisingly well tolerated. Older patients were able to use the device without significant difficulty. Virtually all patients found the device helpful and, often fun. Physical therapists felt that the devices helped personalize the therapy program. The functional information from the device was much more helpful in guiding care in the first 3 weeks following surgery than PROM scores. Conclusion. It is anticipated that sensor devices of the kind tested in this study will have a major impact on the care of TKA patients. The purpose of this study was not to measure that impact. Our goal was to examine the factors that optimize the use of these devices. It is critical that clear device instructions be given to patients. Office procedures must be established to monitor use of the devices. If protocols are established for their use, surface sensors have the potential to provide invaluable information to TKA patients and caregivers

Background. In the late 1980's Michael Freeman conceived the idea that knee replacement would most closely replicate the natural knee joint, if the medial Tibio-Femoral articulation was configured as a “ball-in-socket”. Over the last three decades, medial rotation and medial pivot designs have proved successful in clinical use. Freeman's final iteration of the medial ball-in-socket concept was the Medial Sphere knee. We report the three-year survivorship, clinical outcomes, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and radiographic analysis of this implant in a multi-centre, multi-surgeon, prospective observational study. Methods. Patients awaiting total knee replacement were recruited by four centres. They had no medical contraindication to surgery, were able to provide informed consent and were available for follow-up. Primary outcome was implant survival at six months, one, two, three and five years. Secondary outcomes were patient reported outcome measures: Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Euroqol (EQ-5D), International Knee Society Score (IKSS), IKSS Functional score and Health State score, complications and radiographic outcomes. Radiographic analysis was undertaken using the TraumaCad software and data analysis was undertaken using SPSS. Results. To date, 328 female and 202 male patients with a mean age 66.9 years and mean body mass index 30.0 were recruited. Three year Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis of cumulative failure showed an implant survival of 99.46% (95% confidence interval 100 – 96.74), when deaths and withdrawals were treated as censored data. Twelve patients withdrew (2.26%), seven died (1.32%) and two knees were revised (0.38%). The mean EQ5D, Health State Scores, OKS, IKSS & IKSS Function scores at three years improved significantly from pre- operative scores (Health State Score: 9.91 (65.59 pre-op to 75.50); OKS: 18.82 (19.90 pre-op to 38.72); IKSS: 39.87 (44.39 pre-op to 92.09); IKSS Function Score: 35.03 (49.42 pre-op to 84.45). The mean improvement of EQ5D at three years was: 0.34 (0.48 pre-op to 0.82). Discussion. Survival of the GMK Sphere to three years in this study was over 99%. Risk of revision compares favourably with UK National Joint Registry (NJR) data. The improvements that are seen in patient reported outcome measures reflect an enhancement in patient function and quality of life. Conclusion. At three years follow-up, the implant demonstrates satisfactory survival and outcomes. Patient matching and evaluation of more cases, at more time points will allow outcome comparison with other implant options

Introduction. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is highly successful due to pain reduction, patient satisfaction, and increased range of motion (ROM) during activities of daily living (ADL). ROM recovery is critical for successful outcomes, however ROM values are typically captured during routine physical therapy (PT) appointments via simplified measures (e.g. goniometric maximum passive ROM). These measures are imprecise, potentially neglecting patients’ home experiences. Accordingly, improved measurement methods are necessary to realistically represent ROM recovery. A validated inertial measurement unit (IMU) method continuously capturing knee ROM was deployed assessing knee ROM recovery during PT appointments and during patients’ routine daily experiences. Our objectives were to 1) continuously capture knee ROM pre-/post-TKA via IMUs and 2) divide each day's data to PT/non-PT segments comparing ‘gold standard’ ROM measurements (PT periods) with non-invasive home measurements (non-PT periods). Given patients are verbally/physically encouraged during PT, we hypothesized PT and non-PT metrics would be significantly different including 1) greater kinematics, 2) shorter times, and 3) greater activity level during PT compared to non-PT. Methods. Following IRB approval, IMUs captured long duration, continuous (8–12 hours/day, ∼50 days) knee ROM pre-/post-TKA. Post-TKA metrics were subdivided to PT/non-PT time periods including maximum ROM, gait phase ROMs (stance/swing), gait times (stride/stance/swing), and activity level. Clinical ROM and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were also captured before/after TKA. Statistical comparisons were completed between pre-TKA, post-TKA PT, and post-TKA non-PT metrics. Correlation analyses were completed between IMU, clinical ROM, and PROMs. Results. 10 TKA patients (3M, 69±13 years) enrolled. Patient compliance with sensor use was high (pre-TKA: 9.7±1.8 hours/day, 6±1 days; post-TKA: 8.5±2.3 hours/day, 37±4 days). Patients received 1.5±0.5 standard PT sessions per postop week (1.1±0.2 hours/session). All patients were well-healed at 6-weeks post-TKA with no additional surgical interventions required. Dividing ROM data showed distinct qualitative differences between PT and non-PT periods. Specifically, maximum knee ROM was significantly less during PT than outside PT during late rehabilitation weeks. Additionally, PT stance and swing phase ROM were significantly greater during PT throughout recovery. No differences in stride/stance/swing time were noted between PT/non-PT periods during recovery. However, significant activity level differences were noted throughout recovery. Discussion. This study highlights limitations utilizing clinic captured ROM establishing recovery. Notably, IMU ROM measurements allow capturing richer information than discrete simplified clinical measures. Maximum flexion during PT was likely less than non-PT due to exercises completed (i.e. high passive ROM vs. low ROM gait performance). PT gait flexion was likely greater than non-PT because of ‘white coat effects’ wherein patients are closely monitored clinically, whereas gait is completed as desired at home. Interestingly, temporal metrics were equal between PT/non-PT implying clinician's presence encourages improved kinematics but has no impact on ambulation timing. Activity level was significantly greater during PT than non-PT likely resultant from clinicians enforcing high activity levels throughout PT sessions. In total, these results imply data captured clinically represents optimum patient performance whereas data captured non-clinically represents realistic patient performance. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. A modern total knee replacement system was introduced in 2012 in order to improve the mechanics of total knee replacement (TKR). The purpose of this study was to assess the early clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who have been treated with this modern TKR system at two years postoperatively. Methods. Patients who received this TKR system between June of 2012 and September of 2014 were included in this prospective registry-based follow-up study. Demographics, component, and surgical data were collected. Radiographic outcomes were also assessed. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of all patients with 2-year follow-up data were collected. Reasons for revision and overall survival at 2-years were evaluated. Results. The study population consisted of 290 patients (307 knees). The mean age was 66 years and 61% were women. 250 patients received cruciate retaining and 57 patients posterior stabilized implants. The median tibiofemoral axis was in 4° valgus and the femoral component was in 5° valgus and 2° flexion. The median coronal and sagittal alignment of the tibial component was −1° varus and −5° slope, respectively. Most patients had tibial components that fit the tibial resection. At one year, 7 of 80 knees had a radiolucency in the tibia or femur. At two years, two of 30 knees had a radiolucency in the tibia or femur. Mean PROMs for thirty-six patients at two years were: EQ-5D WHI 0.76 (range 0.31–1.00), EQ-5D VAS 82 (range 48–98), UCLA activity score 5.3 (range 2–10), KOOS pain 70.9 (22–100), symptoms 69 (14–96), ADL 74.2 (18–100), sports 51.4 (0–100), and QoL 59.8 (0–90). Cumulative 2-year implant survival was 97.1%. There were 7 revisions for infection and 2 revisions due to an unsatisfactory clinical outcome. Conclusion. Clinical and radiographic outcomes at two years were good, and overall implant survival was excellent