Abstract. Introduction. Anecdotal reports suggest some cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacements (OUKRs) have painful early subsidence of the tibial component with valgus rotation and/or posterior tilting. The incidence of subsidence and its association with pain is poorly understood. This radiographic study aimed to evaluate the incidence of tibial subsidence and five-year patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of a cementless OUKR cohort. Methodology. Cementless OUKRs from a high-volume centre with acceptable post-operative and five-year radiographs were included. Subsidence was determined by measuring the angle of the tibial tray/tibial axis angle and distance between the tibial tray axis and fibula head on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs using a custom MATLAB program. Analysis of 5-year PROMs assessed the relationship between subsidence and pain. Radiographs indicating tibial subsidence were validated by two observers. Results. Radiographs of 94 cementless OUKRs were analysed of which five tibial components had subsided (incidence=5%) with an average of 1.92° varus rotation and 2.97° posterior tilt. Subsidence appeared to occur within the first post-operative year with all tibial components fixed securely at 5 years. Two subsiders had moderate pain (ICOAP=20.5,15.9, AKSS Pain=20,45) and lower Oxford Knee Scores (OKS=26,31) compared to the cohort means (ICOAP=3.91, AKSS Pain=45.9, OKS = 43.6). These two subsiders had BMIs greater than 30. Conclusion. This study found 5% of cementless OUKRs in the cohort underwent tibial subsidence. Subsidence with moderate pain occurred in 2% of cases, and pain may be associated with obesity. A larger study is needed to study subsidence in greater detail

Abstract. Background. Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation is a clinically and cost-effective option for symptomatic cartilage defects. In 2017 we initiated a program for OCA transplantation for complex chondral and osteochondral defects as a UK tertiary referral centre. Aim. To characterise the complications, re-operation rate, graft survivorship and clinical outcomes of knee OCA transplantation. Methodology. Analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients treated with primary OCA transplantation from 2017 to 2021 with a minimum of one-year follow-up. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), complications, re-operations and failures were evaluated. Results. 37 patients with 37 knee OCA procedures were included (mean age 31.6 years [16–49 years]). Mean BMI 26.6 kg/m2 (19.1–35.9 kg/m2). The mean chondral defect size was 3cm2 (1.2–7.3 cm2). Mean duration of follow-up was 3.1 years (1–5.3 years). 16 patients underwent meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT), 6 underwent osteotomy and 4 underwent ligament reconstruction as concurrent procedures. Significant improvements in mean PROMs were noted at 12 months. 16 patients had reoperations of which 5 had more than one surgery. Of these patients 6 were related to OCA (mainly debridement and revision OCA in one patient), and the remainder were related to additional procedures including removal of plate in 2 patients. The overall failure rate was 1 in 37 patients (3%). Conclusions. Early experience of OCA as a treatment option for complex chondral and osteochondral lesions in the knee shows satisfactory results. The reoperation rate is high but at mean follow-up of 3.1 years the survival rate was 97%

Abstract. Introduction. Osteotomy is recognised treatment for osteoarthritis of the knee. Evidence suggests favourable outcomes when compared to arthroplasty, for younger and more active individuals[1]. Double level osteotomy (DLO) is considered when a single level is insufficient to restore both joint line obliquity and adequate realignment[2]. This paper aims to establish the functional outcomes up to two years post operatively for patients undergoing DLO, using patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methodology. All patients who underwent a DLO at either Lister Hospital, Stevenage, or One Hatfield Hospital, Hertfordshire, between 1st January 2018 and 1st October 2020 were identified. DLO were performed by two specialist consultants, independently or in combination. PROMs including pain scores, health score, Oxford knee score (OKS) and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) were recorded pre-operatively and at six month, one and two year post operative intervals. Results. 24 patients underwent DLO; a medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy and lateral closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy. The cohort comprised 21 males, 3 females with an average age of 54.09 (38–77) years. Preoperative pain scores graded from 0–10 improved from 6.86 to 2.0 at 2 years. OKS improved from 23.94 to 47.88, as did KOOS 43.55 to 87.51, over the same duration. Conclusion. DLO was associated with improvements in pain and functional outcomes, compared to pre-operative levels. In patients for whom arthroplasty may be unfavourable, this provides an alternative to non-operative management, the options for which are frequently exhausted early in the disease process

Abstract. Introduction. In revision knee arthroplasty, rotating hinge implants (RHK) have been considered to result in higher complication rates and lower survivorship when compared to constrained condylar implants (CCK). The aims of this study were to compare patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), complication rates and survivorship of RHK and CCK used in revision arthroplasty at a single, high volume elective orthopaedic centre with previously validated bespoke database. Methodology. One hundred and eight patients who underwent revision knee arthroplasty with either CCK or RHK and matched our inclusion criteria were identified. EQ5D, Health State and Oxford Knee Scores were collected pre-operatively and at 1 year post-operatively. Complication data was collected at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post-operatively. NJR data was interrogated, in addition to our own database, to investigate implant survival. Results. There was no statistically significant difference between RHK and CCK in implant survival at two to twelve years of follow up. In addition, we observed no statistically significant difference in the PROMs scores and complication rates of the two implants. Conclusion. This study shows that both the RHK and CCK remain viable options in revision arthroplasty, the implant survival and complication rate were comparable. We recommend prospective randomised control trials with long-term follow up to further investigate the use of CCK and RHK implants in revision knee arthroplasty

Introduction. Instability following total knee arthroplasty is a leading cause of failure and is often treated with component revision. The goal of this study was to determine if isolated tibial polyethylene insert exchange (ITPIE) to a higher-level constraint would afford similar outcomes to component revision in the properly selected patient. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 176 consecutive patients between 2016–2017 who were revised for symptomatic instability at a single institution. Demographic information and level of constraint preoperatively and postoperatively were documented. Radiographic parameters were also recorded for patients undergoing ITPIE. Outcome measures included all cause re-revision rates as well as patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) obtained preoperatively and at minimum 1-yr follow up. Descriptive analysis including sample t-test and chi square test were performed with statistical significance set at p <0.05. Results. 100 patients underwent component revision. 76 patients underwent ITPIE. Patients undergoing ITPIE were not found to have gross malalignment, malrotation, compromised fixation or insufficient collateral ligaments. No statistically significant differences were noted in terms of demographic characteristics between the groups. Similar increases in constraint as well as the thickness of the polyethylene were noted at the time of revision surgery in both groups. Further, patients underwent similar rates of re-revision (15.9% for component revision and 11.8% for ITPIE), p=0.8. In analyzing PROMs, no statistically significant differences were noted. Radiographic parameters of those who underwent ITPIE showed majority of patients to have well aligned components. The average follow-up was 2.3(±1.0)yrs for the component revision group and 2.2(±1.1)yrs for the ITPIE group. Conclusion. In the appropriately selected patient, ITPIE offers similar rates of success to component revision including similar re-revision rates and similar improvement in PROMs. Degree of constraint is generally increased and recommended when patients are treated for instability regardless of component revision or ITPIE. Abbreviations. ITPIE - isolated tibial polyethylene insert exchange. PROMs - patient reported outcome measures

Introduction. Implementing operative eligibility thresholds based on body mass index (BMI) alone risks restricting access to improved pain, function, and quality-of-life. The purpose of this study was to: 1) investigate the relationship between BMI and improvements in 1-year patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), and 2) determine how many patients would have been denied 1-year improvements with specific BMI cut-offs. Methods. Data were collected on a prospective cohort of 3,214 TKA patients from 2015–2018. Clinically meaningful 1-year improvements were defined as 15 points for Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) pain and Physical Function Shortform (PS), and 14 points for Knee-Related Quality-of-Life (KRQOL). For specific BMI cut-offs, the positive predictive value for predicting a failure to improve and number of patients denied surgery to avoid one failed improvement was calculated. Results. PROMs improvements were greater with increasing BMI. Patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m. 2. had median (Q1, Q3) KOOS pain improvements of 47.2 points (33.3, 58.3) and those with BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m. 2. had median improvements of 41.7 (27.8, 55.6). Similar findings were observed for KOOS PS (28.4 vs. 26.3) and KRQOL (50.0 vs. 43.8). With a BMI cut-off of 30 kg/m. 2. , 9 patients would have been denied improvements from surgery for each failed improvement avoided whereas with a BMI cut-off of 50 kg/m. 2. , 15 patients would have been denied improvements from surgery. Implementing BMI thresholds alone did not influence the rate of improvements in KOOS-PS or KRQOL. Conclusion. Patients with higher BMI were observed to have greater improvements in PROMs after primary TKA. Enforcing arbitrary BMI cut-offs would deprive pain and functional improvements from patients who would benefit the most. Moreover, there appears to be no increase in the rate of PROMs improvements by enforcing BMI thresholds. This study demonstrates that determining TKA eligibility should involve a holistic approach rather than limiting to BMI measurements alone

Introduction. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used as quality benchmarks in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The objective of this study was to investigate whether PROMs correlate with patient satisfaction, which is arguably the most important and desired outcome. Methods. An institutional joint database was queried for patients who underwent primary, elective, unilateral TJA. Eligible patients were asked to complete a satisfaction survey at final follow-up. Correlation coefficients (R) were calculated to quantify the relationship between patient satisfaction and prospectively collected PROMs. We explored a wide range of PROMs including Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC); Short Form-12 (SF-12), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Knee Society Clinical Rating Score (KSCRS), Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE), and University of California Los Angeles activity level rating (UCLA). Results. In general, there was only weak to moderate correlation between patient satisfaction and PROMs. Querying the absolute postoperative scores had higher correlation with patient satisfaction compared to either preoperative scores or net changes in scores. The correlation was higher with disease-specific PROMs (WOMAC, OHS, KSCRS) compared to general health (SF-12), activity level (UCLA), or perception of normalcy (SANE). Within disease-specific PROMs, the pain domain consistently carried the highest correlation with patient satisfaction (WOMAC pain subscale, R = 0.45, p <0.001; KSCRS pain subscale, R = 0.49, p <0.001). Conclusion. There is only weak to moderate correlation between PROMs and patient satisfaction. PROMs alone are not the optimal way to evaluate patient satisfaction. We recommend directly querying patients about satisfaction and using shorter PROMs, particularly disease-specific PROMs that assess pain perception to better gauge patient satisfaction. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was introduced to improve limb alignment, component positioning, and soft-tissue balance, yet the effect of adoption of this technology has not been established. This study was designed to evaluate whether robotic-assisted TKA leads to improved patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient satisfaction as compared to conventional TKA at 3 and 12 months. Methods. This IRB-approved single-surgeon retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected data compared 113 conventional TKA patients with 145 imageless robotic-assisted TKA patients (Navio™ Surgical System, Smith&Nephew®, Memphis TN). Basic demographic information, intraoperative and postoperative data, and PROMs (SF-P, SF-M, WOMAC pain, WOMAC stiffness, WOMAC Physical Function, KSS) were collected and recorded preoperatively, at 3 months, and at 12 months following surgery. Range of motion (ROM), blood loss, surgical duration, and complication rates between groups were also collected. Continuous measures such as mean difference in PROMs and ROM were compared using unpaired t-tests. Categorical measures such as the percentage of patients with complications were compared using chi-square analysis. Results. There were no baseline demographic differences or preoperative PROMs between groups. Following TKA, there were no differences between groups with respect to ROM or any of the PROMs (SF-P, SF-M, WOMAC pain, WOMAC stiffness, WOMAC Physical Function, and KS scores) at 3- or 12-months. Difference between the group included larger EBL(242 vs 209 mL, p<.001) and longer surgical duration (119 vs 107minutes, p<.001) for robotic-assisted surgery. There were no differences between the two groups in total post operative complications however subgroup analysis demonstrated that the robotic assisted cohort had fewer periprosthetic joint infections (1 vs 3, p=.048) and total reoperations (1 vs 7, p=.0114). Conclusions. Imageless robotic-assisted TKA resulted in similar function and satisfaction scores when compared to conventional TKA at 3 and 12 months. While EBL and surgical duration were greater with robotic-assisted TKA, this technique resulted in fewer reoperations and periprosthetic wound infections. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

Purpose. Patient expectations of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be managed through education. E-learning is the application of information technology to education. Providing information to patients at the place and time of their choosing, e-learning has the potential to broaden the reach of existing services for patients. This study evaluated whether an e-learning tool could affect whether patients felt their expectations were met and whether they were satisfied with surgery one year following primary TKA. Method. We recruited consecutive patients with osteoarthritis and randomized them to either standard patient education (n=207), or to our standard patient education plus a new e-learning tool (n=209). Preoperative measures were completed following the patients’ Pre-Admission clinic (PAC) visit and prior to accessing the e-learning tool. Postoperative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were completed at six weeks, three months and one year after TKA. We used the Postoperative Expectation Questionnaire to measure the degree to which patient expectations had been met and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) question to measure patient satisfaction at one year postoperative. We collected several PROMs for descriptive purposes including: new Knee Society Knee Scoring System (KSS); (Pre-Op and Post-Op versions), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, version 2 (SF-12), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score, and the Social Role Participation Questionnaire (SRPQ). Results. Both groups were similar with respect to their preoperative PROMs. Preoperative patient satisfaction was low, with few patients satisfied with their present state prior to TKA and similar between groups (14% intervention group, 11% control group). At one year postoperatively, the risk that expectations of patients were not met was 21.8% in the control group and 21.4% in the intervention group for a risk difference of 1.3% (95% CI −7.8% to 10.4%, p = 0.78). The proportion of patients satisfied with their TKA at one year postoperative was similar in the intervention group 78.6% and the control group 78.2%, and the risk difference 0.6% (95% CI −8.4% to 9.6%) was not statistically significant (p = 0.78). At one year postoperative we found significant postoperative between-group differences in favour of the control group for the new KSS symptoms score and the functional activities score. We also found that control patients had less anxiety, lower scores for rumination, magnification, and helplessness than intervention patients on the PCS. Conclusion. Patients randomized to the e-learning tool had significantly better KSS symptom scores and functional activities scores as well as lower anxiety and helplessness scores but they did not have a reduced risk of expectations not being met or an improved overall satisfaction with their TKA

Introduction. New implants for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are frequently introduced with the promise of improved performance. Infrequently there is accompanying data to document relative performance. The goal of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of an implant widely used for decades (Existing TKA), compared to a new implant (New TKA) from the same manufacturer. Methods. From October 2011-March 2015, 19 sites prospectively enrolled and implanted 752 Subjects with Existing TKA. Between November 2012 and May 2015, 23 sites (18 sites had enrolled Existing TKAs), implanted 1131 Subjects with the New TKA. Demographics were similar between groups. Subjects were seen preoperatively, <1-year, 1-year, and 2-years to collect patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), radiographs and any complications. PROMs consisted of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) (permits WOMAC scoring), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Patient's Knee Implant Performance (PKIP) and EQ5D-3L and a p-value of 0.01 was established for statistical significance for PROMs comparisons. Kaplan-Meier (KM) implant survivorship (revision of any component for any reason) estimates were calculated. Results. The mean follow-up for the Existing and New groups was 2.2 years (SD: 0.7) and 2.5 years (SD: 0.8), respectively. The difference in KM survivorship was not statistically significant (p=0.9727, Figure 1). In the Existing TKA group, 11/752 Subjects required component revision with 6 involving removal of metal components for the following reasons: infection (4), pain (5), loosening (1) and instability (1). In the New TKA group, 19/1137 Subjects required component revision with 7 involving removal of metal components for the following reasons: infection (6), joint stiffness (6), pain (3), bone fracture (2), crepitus (1), and loosening (1). The 2-year PROMs were compared between groups and demonstrated similar or improved scores in favor of the New vs. Existing TKA. Mean outcomes for New TKA vs. Existing TKA at 2 years were: KOOS (ADL: 89.0 vs. 86.9, p=0.005; Pain: 89.0 vs. 87.1, p=0.018; Symptoms: 84.1 vs. 82.1, p=0.010; Sport/Rec: 63.9 vs. 58.8, p=0.001, QOL: 77.0 vs. 73.5, p=0.003), PKIP (Overall: 76.5 vs. 73.5, p=0.003; Confidence: 8.4 vs. 8.1, p=0.003; Stability: 8.6 vs. 8.3, p=0.006; Satisfaction: 8.3 vs. 8.1, p=0.053; Modify Activities: 6.6 vs. 6.4, p=0.335), OKS (42.0 vs. 41.1, p=0.023), and EQ5D-3L (0.88 vs. 0.88, p=0.906). There was no difference between the two groups in the percent of Subjects with immediate postop radiographic interface gaps or radiolucencies (metal-cement or the bone-cement interfaces). Conclusion. The implant survivorship and radiographic assessments showed similar outcomes between the two groups. The New TKA demonstrated modest improvements in PROMs across a broad spectrum of measures. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Introduction. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are recognized as crucial in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). New Knee Society Score (NKSS), introduced in 2011, is reported to be an effective, such outcome measure. Forgotten Joint score (FJS), introduced in 2012, has been validated but has only a few studies in literature reporting upon it. In a normal population without arthritis, the FJS is reported to be between 50–95, a higher score representing better status. Our aim was to determine 1) the FJS at 1-year post TKA, distributing patients in 2 groups of FJS less than/more than 50; assessing its ceiling and floor effect 2) the influence of age, sex, BMI, diabetes, thyroid, type of deformity, pre/post-operative flexion and 3) to compare and correlate FJS with NKSS and its sub-scores - Objective knee score(OKS) and Subjective knee score(SKS). Methods. We enrolled 181 patients (222 knees), who had primary TKA performed by the same surgeon at Lilavati Hospital & Research Centre, Mumbai, between June 2016 to February 2017. NKSS was administered to each patient preoperatively. At 1 year, they were prospectively called for review and NKSS and FJS were administered. 151 patients attended the review clinic and 17 patients completed the forms with the help of their physiotherapist and sent them via email. 13 patients who could not do either, were excluded from the study. Thus, we had 168 patients (207 knees) whose complete data was analyzed. Of 168 patients, 37 were males and 131 were females, with an average age of 67 years (37–85). Patients were divided into two groups based on their FJS score - Group A (FJS<50) and Group B (FJS≥50). The demographics and NKSS in both groups were compared. The study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software. Raw data statistics for FJS was determined and unpaired t-test used to compare all parameters in Groups A and B. Correlation of NKSS to FJS was analyzed using Pearson's correlation test. Results. 1). FJS at 1 year: The median FJS at 1 year was 68.8 (IQR 41.7, mean 68, SD 25.3, range 0–100). It exhibited a 14% ceiling and 0.5% floor effect. There were 49 (24%) TKAs in Group A and 158 (76%) TKAs in Group B. 2). Comparison of parameters of age, sex, BMI, diabetes, thyroid disorder, type and severity of deformity and pre/post-operative flexion between the two groups showed no difference (unpaired t-test p>0.05) for each parameter, with the numbers available. 3).  . In Group A, the median values of NKSS, OKS and SKS were 174, 94 and 87 respectively as compared to the corresponding median values of 198, 98 and 100 in Group B. The difference in their corresponding values was seen to be significant (p<0.005). For both groups, the change in scores from preoperative to postoperative values was significant for NKSS (median of 73 vs 69, p=0.003) & SKS (median of 39 vs 30, p=0.006) but not for OKS (median of 47 vs 46, p=0.655). Correlation of the FJS to NKSS at 1 year was seen to be significant (p<0.005), the strength of correlation was found to be moderate (r=0.43). Each sub-score also showed significant correlation (p<0.005), which was weak to moderate (r=0.32 to 0.43). Conclusion. Mean FJS at 1-year post TKA was 68 which compares well with a mean of 72 reported in the normal population without arthritis. It exhibited 14% ceiling and 0.5% floor effects. FJS was not influenced by age, sex, BMI, co-morbidities, type/extent of deformity or pre/post-operative flexion range. Patients with higher FJS also had higher NKSS and higher OKS/SKS values but change in scores was significant only for NKSS & SKS. We observed a moderately positive correlation of FJS with NKSS at 1 year

Aims

To identify the responsiveness, minimal clinically important difference (MCID), minimal clinical important change (MIC), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds in the 36-item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) (v2) for each of the eight dimensions and the total score following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Aims

Patient-specific instrumentation of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a technique permitting the targeting of individual kinematic alignment, but deviation from a neutral mechanical axis may have implications on implant fixation and therefore survivorship. The primary objective of this randomized controlled study was to compare the fixation of tibial components implanted with patient-specific instrumentation targeting kinematic alignment (KA+PSI) versus components placed using computer-assisted surgery targeting neutral mechanical alignment (MA+CAS). Tibial component migration measured by radiostereometric analysis was the primary outcome measure (compared longitudinally between groups and to published acceptable thresholds). Secondary outcome measures were inducible displacement after one year and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) over two years. The secondary objective was to assess the relationship between alignment and both tibial component migration and inducible displacement.

Aims

Our aim was to perform a meta-analysis of the outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, comparing the use of different types of graft.

Aims

We wished to compare the clinical outcome, as assessed by questionnaires and the rate of complications, in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) undertaken with patient-matched positioning guides (PMPGs) or conventional instruments.

Aims

Oxidised zirconium was introduced as a material for femoral components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as an attempt to reduce polyethylene wear. However, the long-term survival of this component is not known.

This study demonstrates a significant correlation between the American Knee Society (AKS) Clinical Rating System and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and provides a validated prediction tool to estimate score conversion.

A total of 1022 patients were prospectively clinically assessed five years after TKR and completed AKS assessments and an OKS questionnaire. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated significant correlations between OKS and the AKS knee and function scores but a stronger correlation (r = 0.68, p < 0.001) when using the sum of the AKS knee and function scores. Addition of body mass index and age (other statistically significant predictors of OKS) to the algorithm did not significantly increase the predictive value.

The simple regression model was used to predict the OKS in a group of 236 patients who were clinically assessed nine to ten years after TKR using the AKS system. The predicted OKS was compared with actual OKS in the second group. Intra-class correlation demonstrated excellent reliability (r = 0.81, 95% confidence intervals 0.75 to 0.85) for the combined knee and function score when used to predict OKS.

Our findings will facilitate comparison of outcome data from studies and registries using either the OKS or the AKS scores and may also be of value for those undertaking meta-analyses and systematic reviews.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:503–9.

The routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in evaluating the outcome after arthroplasty by healthcare organisations reflects a growing recognition of the importance of patients’ perspectives in improving treatment. Although widely embraced in the NHS, there are concerns that PROMs are being used beyond their means due to a poor understanding of their limitations.

This paper reviews some of the current challenges in using PROMs to evaluate total knee arthroplasty. It highlights alternative methods that have been used to improve the assessment of outcome.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:3–9.

A small proportion of patients have persistent pain after total knee replacement (TKR). The primary aim of this study was to record the prevalence of pain after TKR at specific intervals post-operatively and to ascertain the impact of neuropathic pain. The secondary aim was to establish any predictive factors that could be used to identify patients who were likely to have high levels of pain or neuropathic pain after TKR.

A total of 96 patients were included in the study. Their mean age was 71 years (48 to 89); 54 (56%) were female. The mean follow-up was 46 months (39 to 51). Pre-operative demographic details were recorded including a Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression score as well as the painDETECT score for neuropathic pain. Functional outcome was assessed using the Oxford Knee score.

The mean pre-operative VAS was 5.8 (1 to 10); and it improved significantly at all time periods post-operatively (p < 0.001): (from 4.5 at day three to five (1 to 10), 3.2 at six weeks (0 to 9), 2.4 at three months (0 to 7), 2.0 at six months (0 to 9), 1.7 at nine months (0 to 9), 1.5 at one year (0 to 8) and 2.0 at mean 46 months (0 to 10)). There was a high correlation (r > 0.7; p < 0.001) between the mean VAS scores for pain and the mean painDETECT scores at three months, one year and three years post-operatively. There was no correlation between the pre-operative scores and any post-operative scores at any time point.

We report the prevalence of pain and neuropathic pain at various intervals up to three years after TKR. Neuropathic pain is an underestimated problem in patients with pain after TKR. It peaks at between six weeks and three-months post-operatively. However, from these data we were unable to predict which patients are most likely to be affected.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1227–33.

This study assessed the effect of concomitant back pain on the Oxford knee score (OKS), Short-Form (SF)-12 and patient satisfaction after total knee replacement (TKR). It involved a prospectively compiled database of demographics and outcome scores for 2392 patients undergoing primary TKR, of whom 829 patients (35%) reported back pain. Compared with those patients without back pain, those with back pain were more likely to be female (odds ratio (OR) 1.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3 to 1.8)), have a greater level of comorbidity, a worse pre-operative OKS (2.3 points (95% CI 1.7 to 3.0)) and worse SF-12 physical (2.0 points (95% CI 1.4 to 2.6)) and mental (3.3 points (95% CI 2.3 to 4.3)) components.

One year post-operatively, those with back pain had significantly worse outcome scores than those without with a mean difference in the OKS of 5 points (95% CI 3.8 to 5.4), in the SF-12 physical component of 6 points (95% CI 5.4 to 7.1) and in the mental component of 4 points (95% CI 3.1 to 4.9). Patients with back pain were less likely to be satisfied (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.5 to 0.78).

After adjusting for confounding variables, concomitant back pain was an independent predictor of a worse post-operative OKS, and of dissatisfaction. Clinicians should be aware that patients suffering concomitant back pain pre-operatively are at an increased risk of being dissatisfied post-operatively.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1632–9.