In the field of hand surgery, physicians are working to improve patient satisfaction by offering several minor procedures in the physician's office via the WALANT method. We seek to investigate the degree of patient satisfaction, out of pocket cost, convenience and comfort experienced with in-office hand procedures. A ten question survey consisting of a ten-point Likert scale of agreement and questions asking for a numerical answer was administered via phone call to 33 patients treated with minor hand operations in the office setting in the United States. There were 18 male and 15 female respondents with an average age of 65.59±12.64 years. Respondents underwent procedures including trigger finger release (18), needle aponeurotomy (7), and other minor hand operations. Survey responses indicated strong agreement with questions 1-3 and 6–8, with responses averaging 9.60±0.23 in these positive metrics. Questions 4 and 5, which asked whether the surgery and recovery period were painful, respectively, averaged 2.65±0.49, indicating a mild level of disagreement that either was “painful”. Additionally, most patients responded that they did not take time off work (12) or are not currently employed (11). Other respondents (3) reported taking between one to five days off work post-operatively. 27 respondents also reported an out of pocket cost averaging $382±$976, depending on insurance coverage. Patients reported a small degree of pain in the operative and post-operative period, a high degree of comfort and convenience and a high degree of satisfaction. Likewise, the patient-reported out of pocket cost was far lower than comparable surgical costs in alternate settings. These results support the use of in-office procedures for minor hand surgeries from a patient perspective and indicate a nearly universal intent to repeat any future hand operations in the office setting

During the COVID-19 pandemic, video/phone consultations (VPC) were increasingly utilised as an alternative to face-to-face (F2F) consultations, to minimise nosocomial viral exposure. We previously demonstrated that VPCs were highly rated by both patients and clinicians. This study compared satisfaction between both clinic modalities in contemporaneously delivered outpatient surveys. We also assessed the feasibility and effects of converting F2F orthopaedic consultations to VPC.

Surveys were posted to patients who attended VPCs and F2F consultations at a large tertiary centre from August to October 2020 inclusive, across 51 specialties. F2F and VPC patients ranked their overall satisfaction with their consultation on a 10-point numerical scale (10=highest satisfaction). Simultaneously, a pilot study was undertaken of outpatient fracture clinics to identify patients suitable for VPCs, with X-rays (if needed) taken and transferred from satellite sites to reduce tertiary centre footfall.

For F2F consultations, 1419 of 4465 surveys (31.8%) were returned with similar rates for VPCs (1332 of 4572, 29.1%). While mean satisfaction ratings were high for both clinic modalities, they were significantly higher for F2F: 9.13 (95% CI 9.05-9.22) for F2F clinics, compared to 8.23 (95% CI 8.11-8.35) for VPCs (p<0.001, t-test). F2F patients were almost four times more likely to state a preference for future F2F appointments compared to VPCs, whereas patients who attended VPCs showed an equal preference for either option (p< 0.001, chi2 test). 53% of 111 fracture clinic patients sampled were identified as suitable for VPCs. 1 patient (1.7%) requested their VPC to be converted to F2F due to poor symptom control.

Our study showed patients reported high satisfaction ratings for both F2F clinics and VPCs, with prior experience of VPCs affecting patients’ future preferences. Only 1.7% of F2F patients converted to VPCs declined their virtual appointment. Our results support future use of VPCs.

We undertook a retrospective audit to assess quality of service provided by Nurse-Led Review Clinic at Glasgow Royal Infirmary for patients sustaining ankle fracture requiring surgical stabilisation. Nursing staff had received training from the senior author regarding clinical examination and radiograph interpretation. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical documentation and radiographs of 104 patients who attended from January 2009 to December 2009. Any clinical issues were identified and radiographs were scrutinised by two of the authors to assess accuracy of interpretation. Nurse-led management was then assessed as to its appropriateness. Finally two retrospective questionnaires were used to assess both the nurses and patients satisfaction with the clinic. Nurse-led clinic protocol: First appointment 10 days: Wound review, application of lightweight plaster. Second appointment 6 weeks: Removal of plaster, check radiographs. Final appointment 12 weeks: Clinical assessment, radiographs, discharge. Clinical assessment: ensure wound satisfactory, range of movement and weight-bearing are improving. Radiographic criteria: 6 weeks: Assess for talar shift, lucency or metal-work concerns. 12 weeks: Assess evidence of fracture union, infection, loosening or backing out. If any concerns with the patients' progress nursing staff would discuss with the consultant. First appointment: 7 wound problems. 5 managed by nurses and resolved. 2 discussed with surgeon, 1 settled, 1 required oral antibiotics. 3 radiographs discussed with surgeon. 2 conservative management. 1 re-operation. Second appointment: 7 wounds managed by nurses. 1 failure of fixation, discussed for re-operation. 2 concerns regarding metal in joint – treated conservatively. Final appointment: 7 referred to physiotherapy as slow to fully weight-bear. 5 discussed for removal of syndesmosis screw. 1 screw in joint, admitted for re-operation. Clinical care provided at Nurse-Led clinic is appropriate and effective. Both nursing staff and patients were satisfied with the care provided. Nurse-led clinic reduces demands on fracture clinic appointments and is a safe, cost effective initiative

Introduction. This study aims to investigate the relationship between ulnar fixation and postoperative satisfaction among patients with distal radius fractures accompanied by ulna styloid fractures, with a particular focus on how sociodemographic factors influence outcomes. Method. A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 120 patients aged 26-53 who underwent surgical treatment for distal radius fractures with concomitant ulna styloid fractures between January 2018 and December 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether ulnar fixation was performed. Sociodemographic data, including age, gender, socioeconomic status, education level, and occupation, were collected. All patients underwent similar physical therapy protocols in the postoperative period, and no complications were observed in any patient. Postoperative satisfaction was assessed using the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores at 6 and 12 months post-surgery. Statistical analysis was conducted to evaluate the influence of ulnar fixation and sociodemographic factors on patient satisfaction. Result. Patients who underwent ulnar fixation (n=60) reported significantly higher satisfaction levels compared to those who did not (n=60), as evidenced by lower PRWE and DASH scores (p < 0.05). Age, gender, and socioeconomic status were significant predictors of postoperative satisfaction. Younger patients, females, and those with higher socioeconomic status exhibited greater improvements in functional outcomes and satisfaction. However, education level and occupation did not significantly influence satisfaction scores. Conclusion. Ulnar fixation in the surgical treatment of distal radius fractures accompanied by ulna styloid fractures is associated with improved postoperative satisfaction. Sociodemographic factors, particularly age, gender, and socioeconomic status, play a crucial role in patient-reported outcomes. Tailoring postoperative care to address these sociodemographic differences may enhance overall patient satisfaction and recovery

Introduction. Orthopedics is experiencing a significant transformation with the introduction of technologies such as robotics and apps. These, integrated into the post-operative rehabilitation process, promise to improve clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and the overall efficiency of the healthcare system. This study examines the impact of an app called Mymobility and intra-operative data collected via the ROSA® robotic system on the functional recovery of patients undergoing robot-assisted knee arthroplasty. Method. The study was conducted at a single center from 2020 to 2023. Data from 436 patients were included, divided into “active” patients (active users of Mymobility) and “non-active” patients. Clinical analyses and satisfaction surveys were carried out on active patients. The intra-operative parameters recorded by ROSA® were correlated with the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) collected via Mymobility. Result. Intra-operative data showed significant correlations with PROMs for the 48 active patients, highlighting the importance of parameters such as medial joint space and ligament laxity. No significant differences were observed between the sexes, but a positive correlation was detected between age and PROMs. The data analysis indicated that an increased medial joint space and reduced ligament laxity are associated with better PROMs. The adoption of Mymobility remained limited, with only 10% of patients fully utilizing the app. Critical factors have been identified to improve recruitment, engagement, and overall experience with the platform. Conclusion. The integration of technologies such as Mymobility and ROSA® in post-operative rehabilitation offers numerous advantages, including the objectification of data, active patient involvement, and personalized care. Challenges remain related to costs, patient compliance, and demographic limitations. Nevertheless, these technologies represent a milestone in modern peri-operative management, being able to improve clinical outcomes and the quality of care

Metacarpal fractures represent up to 33% of all hand fractures; of which the majority can be treated non-operatively. Previous research has shown excellent putcomes with non-operative treatment yet surgical stabilisation is recommended to avoid malrotation and symptomatic shortening. It is unknown whether operative is superior to non-operative treatment in oblique or spiral metacarpal shaft fractures. The aim of the study was to compare non-operative treatment of mobilisation with open surgical stabilisation. 42 adults (≥ 18 years) with a single displaced oblique or spiral metacarpal shaft fractures were randomly assigned in a 1:1 pattern to either non-operative treatment with free mobilisation or operative treatment with open reduction and fixation with lag screws in a prospective study. The primary outcome measure was grip-strength in the injured hand in comparison to the uninjured hand at 1-year follow-up. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score, ranges of motion, metacarpal shortening, complications, time off work, patient satisfaction and costs were secondary outcomes. All 42 patients attended final follow-up after 1 year. The mean grip strength in the non-operative group was 104% (range 73–250%) of the contralateral hand and 96% (range 58–121%) in the operatively treated patients. Mean metacarpal shortening was 5.0 (range 0–9) mm in the non-operative group and 0.6 (range 0–7) mm in the operative group. There were five minor complications and three revision operations, all in the operative group. The costs for non-operative treatment were estimated at 1,347 USD compared to 3,834USD for operative treatment; sick leave was significantly longer in the operative group (35 days, range 0–147) than in the non-operative group (12 days, range 0–62) (p=0.008). When treated with immediate free mobilization single, patients with displaced spiral or oblique metacarpal shaft fractures have outcomes that are comparable to those after operative treatment, despite some metacarpal shortening. Complication rates, costs and sick leave are higher with operative treatment. Early mobilisation of spiral or long oblique single metacarpal fractures is the preferred treatment. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03067454

The current study aims to find the role of Enhance Recovery Pathway (ERP) as a multidisciplinary approach aimed to expedite rapid recovery, reduce LOS, and minimize morbidity associated with Non Fusion Anterior Scoliosis Correction (NFASC) surgery. A retrospective analysis of 35 AIS patients who underwent NFASC with Lenke 1 and Lenke 5 curves with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up was done. Patient demographics, surgical details, postoperative analgesia, mobilization, length of stay (LOS), patient satisfaction survey score with respect to information and care, and 90 days complications were collected. The cohort included 34 females and 1 male with a mean age of 15.2 years at the time of surgery. There were 16 Lenke 1 and 19 Lenke 5 in the study. Mean preoperative major thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar Cobb's angle were 52˚±7.6˚ and 51˚±4.5˚ respectively. Average blood loss and surgical time were 102 ±6.4 ml and 168 ± 10.2 mins respectively. Average time to commencing solid food was 6.5±1.5 hrs. Average time to mobilization following surgery was 15.5± 4.3 hrs. The average duration to the stopping of the epidural was 42.5±3.5 hrs. The average dose of opioid consumption intraoperatively was 600.5±100.5 mcg of fentanyl i.v. and 12.5±4.5 mg morphine i.v. Postoperatively opioids were administered via an epidural catheter at a dose of 2 mg of morphine every 24 hours up to 2 days and an infusion of 2mcg/hr of fentanyl along with 0.12-0.15% ropivacaine. The average duration to transition to oral analgesia was 55.5±8.5 hrs .20 patients had urinary catheter and the average time to removal of the catheter was 17.5±1.4 hrs. 25 patients had a chest tube and the average time to remove of chest tube was 25.5±3.2 hrs. The average length of hospital stay was 3.1±0.5 days. No patient had postoperative ileus or requirement of blood transfusion or any other complications. No correlation was found between LOS and initial cobb angle. The application of ERP in AIS patients undergoing NFASC results in reduced LOS and indirectly the cost, reduced post-operative opioid use, and overall improve patient satisfaction score

Abstract. Objectives. There is still controversy in the literature over whether Cervical Foraminotomy or Anterior Cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is best for treating cervical Radiculopathy. Numerous studies have focused on the respective complication rates of these procedures and outcome measures with a lack of due consideration to preoperative MRI findings. Proximal foraminal stenosis can theoretically be accessed via either approach. We aimed to investigate whether patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) favoured one approach over the other in patients with proximal foraminal stenosis. Methods. A single centre retrospective review of patients undergoing either ACDF or Cervical foraminotomy over the period 2012 to 2022. VAS, Neck disability index (NDI), EQ5DL and Patient Satisfaction on a Five Point Likert scale were obtained. Patients who had both an ACDF and a Foraminotomy were excluded. Axial MRI images were analysed and the location of the worst clinically relevant disc herniation stratified as follows: Central (1), Paracentral (2) and Foraminal (3). Correlations and average PROMs were analysed in SPSS. Results. PROMs scores were available for 33 ACDF patients and 37 Foraminotomy patients. Average surgery time in ACDF group was 167 minutes while Foraminotomy 142 minutes. Average Length of hospital stay was 6.24 days in the Foraminotomy group and 3.54 days in the ACDF group. 18 patients were excluded due to having both surgeries (2 of which developed CSF leaks postoperatively). Of the included patients there were no postoperative complications. 13 patients in the ACDF had Central or Paracentral stenosis in addition to proximal Foraminal stenosis, 3 patients in the Foraminotomy group had some significant Paracentral herniation just before the Proximal foramen. The majority of patients in both groups had pure proximal Foraminal stenosis (N= 17 (ACDF), 20 (Foraminotomy). The results showed no significant difference in PROMs between patients who received an ACDF or a Foraminotomy for Proximal foraminal stenosis (EQ5DL, NDI, and satisfaction, P= 0.268, 0.253 and 0.327). There was no correlation between location of the stenosis and PROM scores in either group. Conclusions. Our data suggest that Proximal foraminal stenosis can be effectively addressed by either an anterior ACDF or a Foraminotomy with no difference in complication rates. Foraminotomy has the benefit of no implant cost but longer hospital stay. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Objective. Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common spinal disorder mostly caused by the arthritic process. In cases with refractory complaints or significant neurologic deficit, decompressive surgery with or without instrumented fusion may be indicated. We aimed to investigate the surgical outcome of multi-level LSS in the patient with stable spine treated by simple decompression versus decompression and instrumented fusion. Methods: We retrospectively studied 51 patients (25 male, 26 female) with stable multi-level (>2 levels) LSS who were treated by decompressive surgery alone (group A, 31 cases) and decompression and instrumented fusion (group B, 20 cases) and followed them for more than two years. The patients’ disability and pain were assessed with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), respectively. At the last follow-up visit, patient satisfaction with surgery was also scored. Results: The two groups were homogeneous in terms of age, sex, severity of disability and pain. Surgery could significantly improve pain and disability in both groups. Preoperative ODI in group A and B were 51.0±23.7 and 54.5±22.9, respectively, however at the last follow-up visit these parameters improved to 23.1±21.1 and 36.6±21.4 showing a statistical significance. Mean patient satisfaction with surgical intervention was also higher in the simple decompression group, but this difference was not significant. Conclusion: In surgical treatment of the patients with multi-level but stable LSS, simple decompression versus decompression and instrumented fusion could achieve more disability improvement for more than two years of follow-up

Telemedicine is the delivery of healthcare from a remote location using integrated computer/communication technology. This systematic review aims to explore evidence for telemedicine in orthopaedics to determine its advantages, validity, effectiveness and utilisation particularly during our current pandemic where patient contact is limited. Databases of PubMed, Scopus and CINHAL were systematically searched and articles were included if they involved any form of telephone or video consultation in an orthopaedic population. Findings were synthesised into four themes: patient/clinician satisfaction, accuracy and validity of examination, safety and patient outcomes and cost effectiveness. Quality assessment was undertaken using Cochrane and Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools. Twenty studies were included consisting of nine RCTs across numerous orthopaedic subspecialties including fracture care, elective orthopaedics and oncology. Studies revealed high patient satisfaction with telemedicine for convenience, less waiting and travelling time. Telemedicine was cost effective particularly if patients had to travel long distances, required hospital transport or time off work. No clinically significant differences were found in patient examination nor measurement of patient reported outcome measures. Telemedicine was reported to be a safe method of consultation. However, studies were of variable methodological quality with selection bias. In conclusion, evidence suggests that telemedicine in orthopaedics can be safe, cost effective, valid in clinical assessment with high patient/clinician satisfaction. Further work with high quality RCTs is required to elucidate long term outcomes. This systematic review presents up-to-date evidence on the use of telemedicine and provides data for organisations considering its use in the current COVID-19 pandemic and beyond

Abstract. Background. The influence of diagnosis on outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is not completely understood. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of different pathologies. Methods. A total of 78 RSAs were performed for the following diagnoses: (1) rotator cuff tear arthropathy(RCA), (2) massive cuff tear(MCT) with osteoarthritis(OA), (3) MCT without OA, (4) arthritis, (5) acute proximal humerus fracture. Mean follow up 36 months (upto 5 years) Range of motion, Oxford Shoulder Score were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively. Results. Mean OSS was 30. The RCA, MCT-with-OA, MCT-without-OA, and arthritis groups all exhibited significant improvements in all outcome scores and in all planes of motion. After adjustment for age and compared with RCA, those with OA had significantly better abduction (P < .05), and those with fractures had significantly worse patient satisfaction (P < .05). Among male patients, those with MCTs without OA had significantly worse satisfaction (P < .05). Conclusion. RSA reliably provides improvement regardless of preoperative diagnosis. Although subtle differences exist between male and female patients, improvements in clinical outcome scores were apparent after RSA

Introduction and Objective. Total shoulder replacement is a common elective procedure offered to patients with end stage arthritis. While most patients experience significant pain relief and improved function within months of surgery, some remain unsatisfied because of residual pain or dissatisfaction with their functional status. Among these patients, when laboratory workup eliminates infection as a possibility, corticosteroid injection (CSI) into the joint space, or on the periprosthetic anatomic structures, is a common procedure used for symptom management. However, the efficacy and safety of this procedure has not been previously reported in shoulder literature. Materials and Methods. A retrospective chart review identified primary TSA patients who subsequently received a CSI into a replaced shoulder from 2011 – 2018 by multiple surgeons. Patients receiving an injection underwent clinical exam, laboratory analysis to rule out infection, and radiographic evaluation prior to CSI. Demographic variables were recorded, and a patient satisfaction survey assessed the efficacy of the injection. Results. Of the 43 responders, 48.8% remembered the injection. The average time from index arthroplasty to injection was median 16.8 months. Overall, 61.9% reported decreased pain, 28.6% reported increased motion, and 28.6% reported long term decreased swelling. Improvement lasted greater than one month for 42.9% of patients, and overall 52.4% reported improvement (slight to great) in the shoulder following CSI. No patient developed a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) within 2 years of injection. Conclusions. This study suggests that certain patients following TSA may benefit from a CSI. However, this should only be performed once clinical, radiographic, and laboratory examination has ruled out conditions unlikely to improve long term from a CSI. Given these findings, further study in a large, prospective trial is warranted to fully evaluate the benefits of CSI following TSA

Introduction and Objective. Osteoarthritis of the knee joint is common in old age population in every part of world. Pain is the major source of disability in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Subchondral bone marrow is richly innervated with nociceptive pain fibers and may be a source of pain in patients with symptomatic degenerative joint disease. Current therapy for managing bone marrow oedema is core decompression (CD), combining core decompression and injection of hydroxyapatite cement or autologus chondrocyte supplementtion. But all of this work has been done in femoral head and authors documented good result with minimal complication. There are various studies in literature suggesting treatment to repair BME by restoring support and relieving abnormal stresses with accepted internal fixation and bone stimulating surgical techniques in relieving knee OA pain. In this study, we present efficacy of knee arthroscopy with adjunctive core decompression and supplementation with structural scaffold to improve self-rated visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, rate of conversion to arthroplasty, and patient satisfaction levels. Materials and Methods. The study included patients aged between 40 and 75 years old, with pain in the knee for at least six months, associated with high-signal MRI lesion on T2 sequences, on the tibia or femur. Trephine was used as the bone decompression instrument. Trephine has a diameter of 8–10 mm and operation with trephine requires that a cortical incision window be made prior to decompression treatment, thus necessitating strict disinfection. This procedure was done under spinal anesthesia. After diagnostic arthroscopy, decompression was done under C –ARM in desired area on MRI. After decompression, defect was filled with Poly ester urea's scaffold impregnated with BMAC. Results. Patients were assessed using the visual analog pain scale and the KOOS score, one week before surgery and one, three, six, 12, and 24 weeks after the procedure. MRI images were analyzed Lesions were mapped and measured in the axial, coronal, and sagittal views to plan the injection site and the trajectory of the cannula used for the procedure. Radiographs using anteroposterior, profile, and Rosenberg views of the knee and lower limb were performed to classify the lesion according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification and to assess lower limb alignment. Evaluation using the KOOS showed a mean total score in the preoperative period of 38.44 points and of 60.7, 59.08, 56.92, 64.40, and 71.36 points at one, three, six, 12, and 24 weeks after surgery, respectively. In the VAS assessment, mean was 7.8 points preoperatively and 2.8, 2.6, 2.5, 1.3, and 0.5 points in the same periods. Conclusions. Hence it can be Concluded that this new innovative technique has provided significant improvements in the parameters of pain and functional capacity in the short-term assessment

Background. There is a paucity of long term data concerning the pre and postoperative patient reported function of total knee replacement. The aim of this study was to determine the mortality, implant survivorship, patient reported function and satisfaction in a cohort of 114 patients, from a single centre, who received a Kinemax total knee replacement more than 15 years ago. Methods. Patients completed a questionnaire incorporating validated disease- and joint-specific scores, patient satisfaction and overall health preoperatively, at 3 months, 1 year, 2 years and a minimum of 15 years following surgery. NHS National Strategic Tracing Service, hospital and primary care records were used to establish mortality and for implant survivorship in deceased patients. Results. 45 patients were alive at final follow up. The survivorship of the cohort with revision of the TKR as the endpoint was 84%. Four cases were revised for wear, three for loosening and one for peri-prosthetic fracture. There was a significant improvement in WOMAC Pain, Function and Stiffness Scores, Oxford Knee Score and Self-Administered Patient Satisfaction Scale between pre-operative and all post-operative time points, although patient satisfaction had decreased significantly by the time of final follow up. Conclusion. In this cohort, the Kinemax TKR showed satisfactory long term survivorship with functional scores demonstrating a high level of patient satisfaction at all follow up time points. Level of Evidence. 2

Purpose. To evaluate the clinical results of arthroscopic repair and open Ahlgren Larsson method in patients with chronic lateral ankle instability. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 87 patients who were operated in our clinic between 2010 and 2018 with the diagnosis of chronic lateral ankle instability. 16 patients with osteochondral lesion, 5 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 4 patients with ankle fractures of the same side, 2 patients with a history of active or previous malignancy were excluded. Preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluations were performed with AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, FAOS and VAS scores. Results. Sixty patients with chronic lateral ankle instability were evaluated. 28 patients, treated with Ahlgren-Larsson method and 32 patients, treated with arthroscopic repair. 36 of the patients were female and 24 were male; the mean age of the arthroscopy group was 44 ± 9; the mean age of the open surgery group was 46 ± 11. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic features (age, sex, VKI). Postoperative clinical improvement was observed in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of functionality. However, there was a statistically significant difference in pain and satisfaction of VAS in favor of arthroscopy group. Conclusions. Ahlgren-Larsson method and arthroscopic repair technique are safe and effective for chronic lateral ankle instability. Arthroscopic technique may be preferred for pain and patient satisfaction as it is less invasive and less morbid

Surgical microfracture is considered a first line treatment for talar osteochondral defects. Pain reduction, functional improvement and patient satisfaction are described to be 61–86% in both primary and secondary osteochondral defects. However, limited research is available whether improvement of the surgical technique is possible. We do know that the current rigid awls and drills limit the access to all locations in human joints and increase the risk of heat necrosis of bone. Application of a flexible water jet instrument to drill the microfracture holes can improve the reachability of the defect without inducing thermal damage. The aim of this study is to determine whether water jet drilling is a safe alternative compared to conventional microfracture awls by studying potential side effects and perioperative complications, as well as the quality of cartilage repair tissue in a caprine model. 6 mm diameter talar chondral defects were created bilaterally in 6 goats (12 samples). One defect in each goat was treated with microfracture holes created with conventional awls. The contralateral defect was treated with holes created with 5 second water jet bursts at a pressure of 50 MPa. The pressure was generated with a custom-made setup using an air compressor connected to a 300 litre accumulator that powered an air driven high-pressure pump (P160 Resato, Roden, The Netherlands, . www.resato.com. ). Postoperative complications were recorded. After 24 weeks, analyses were performed using the ICRS macroscopic score and the modified O'Driscoll histological score. Wilcoxon ranked sum tests were used to assess significant differences between the two instrument groups using each goat as its own control (p ≤ 0.05). One postoperative complication was signs of a prolonged wound healing with swelling and reluctance to weight bearing starting two days after surgery on the water jet side. Antibiotics were administered which resolved the symptoms. The median total ICRS score for the tali treated with water jets was 9,5 (range: 6–12) and 9 (range 2–11) for Observer 1 and 2 respectively; and for the tali treated conventionally this was 9,5 (range 5–11) and 9 range (2–10). The median total Modified O'Driscoll score for the tali treated with water jets was 15 (range: 7–17) and 13 (range: 3–20) for Observer 1 and 2 respectively; and for the tali treated conventionally was 13 (range: 11–21) and 15 (range: 9–20). No differences were found in complication rate or repair tissue quality between the two techniques. The results suggest that water jet drilling can be a safe alternative for conventional microfracture treatment. Future research and development will include the design of an arthroscopic prototype of the water jet drill. The focus will be on stability in nozzle positioning and minimized sterile saline consumption to further the decrease the risk of soft tissue damage

Weber A fractures are a sub-group of ankle fractures parallel or distal to the joint line, below the level of the syndesmosis. Most stable Weber A fractures are managed conservatively with no significant difference in outcome vs. surgical intervention. 1,2. In an effort to ensure staff time was being used as efficiently as possible, a consultant-led virtual fracture clinic (VFC) was introduced to manage Weber A fractures. Patients not requiring immediate surgery were reviewed remotely and, wherever possible, were ‘virtually discharged’ to a nurse-led telephone line. Those with diagnostic uncertainty, unusual features or delayed recovery received a face to face review from a nurse or surgeon. To examine how patients were allocated under this protocol, along with overall patient satisfaction and functional outcome. An audit of satisfaction and outcome was performed of all patients who presented with a Weber A fracture to the ED between October 2011 and October 2012. The minimum follow-up period was two years. A satisfaction and patient reported outcome (5-level-likert-scale, EQ-5D, MOXFQ) measure was conducted via telephone. 3,4. After exclusions, 79 patients were left, of which 63 were successfully contacted (80%). Of the 79 patients included, 33 (42%) required early face-to-face review while 46 (58%) were discharged with advice following discussion at the VFC. Of the 63 successfully contacted, receipt of the information leaflet was recalled by 61 (97%) and 54 (86%) were satisfied with the information they had received. There was no difference in patient satisfaction regarding recovery (p=0.079) or treatment information (p=0.236) provided between avulsion and transverse fractures or in functional outcome according to MOXFQ (p=0.626) or EQ-Vas (p=0.915) scores. Patient satisfaction can remain high without face-to-face consultations following injury. This was demonstrated by the high satisfaction with recovery (83%) and with information provided (86%) and is consistent with current published literature and similar to what would have been achieved with traditional fracture clinic review. 5. The new protocol reduces unnecessary hospital attendances for patients and reduces the burden of unnecessary review in orthopaedic departments. Only 15% of patients required review at a traditional fracture clinic and 27% at a nurse-led clinic, freeing resources for more complex cases

During revision THR, the surgery is often difficult and compromised due to lack of patient's bone especially in the pelvis. Any extra bone in the acetabulum is expected to be of advantage to the patient and the surgeon. The aim of this study was to see if preservation of medial acetabular osteophyte in uncemented total hip replacement had any adverse effect on the prosthesis survival or patient satisfaction. Conventional acetabular preparation involves reaming down to the true floor. This not only medialises the centre of rotation of the hip but also reduces the acetabular offset. In contrast the main surgeon preserved the acetabular offset by preserving some osteophytic bone between the true floor of the acetabulum and the acetabular cup. This is achieved by reaming the acetabular cavity conservatively while achieving secure primary fixation of the prosthesis. We report the outcome of a single surgeon series of such cases. The endpoint was assessed as the need for revision of the acetabular cup. A total of 106 consecutive patients were identified who underwent uncemented THR from 2005 to 2010. The medial osteophyte was measured on immediate post-operative x-rays, from the “teardrop” to the nearest point of the acetabular cup, by 3 surgeons (one consultant and 2 registrars). The patients were contacted for a telephone interview and their clinical notes, including x-rays, were reviewed. Outcome was available for 79 patients. 74 patients were available for follow-up and 5 patients died unrelated to THR. Average follow-up was for 8.3 years (range 5.5–10.8). Average age was 62 years. The average medial osteophyte was 1.98 mm (range 0–14mm). One patient had late infection and one had dislocation. There was not a single failure of the acetabular component. The patient satisfaction was high at 8.8 out of 10. Preservation of medial osteophyte in the acetabulum whilst doing uncemented THR has the advantage of retaining the patient's own bone stock which can be of great advantage to the surgeon as well as the patient should revision THR be required in future. Our study has shown that this can be achieved without compromising the survival of the prosthesis or the patient satisfaction. This technique may increase the range of motion of the hip by reducing the risk of bony or soft tissue impingement, and also reduce the risk of dislocation. Furthermore, not recreating the native centre of rotation of the hip does not seem to have any adverse effect for the patients, who are very happy with the outcome. We recommend that whilst doing uncemented THR, the acetabulum should not be reamed to the true floor as has been the conventional teaching, but attempt should be made to preserve some medial osteophyte where possible, at the same ensuring that good primary fixation of the cup is achieved. This is to give the patient and surgeon the advantage of extra available bone should revision surgery be required in the future

Purpose. Flat feet are an important cause of foot problems in children. The flexible flat foot is the most common form and is normally physiological and asymptomatic. Further assessment is necessary when a symptomatic flat foot persists. Surgical interventions are indicated when conservative therapies have failed. The Kalix arthroereisis is a surgical option and is placed in the subtalar joint of the foot, thereby preventing hyperpronation, and stabilizes the foot against excessive movements. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes of pediatric patients who had undergone a Kalix implantation for the treatment of a symptomatic flexible flat foot. Methods. Patient files of our institution were searched for patients who underwent a Kalix implantation between 2009 and 2014. Sixteen patients (26 feet) with symptomatic flexible flat feet were clinically and radiographically evaluated in this retrospective study. The calcaneal pitch and Meary”s angle were measured on the pre-, and postoperative follow-up radiographs and patient satisfaction survey was performed at follow-up to gain insight into functional outcome and satisfaction after the intervention. Results. Surgery was performed on an average age at 12.5 (range:10–15) years with a mean time from surgery to follow-up of 45.1±3.16 (range:18–78) months. There was a statistically significant increase in calcaneal pitch of 2.9° (11.7°to14.6°) and decrease in Meary”s angle of 15.8° (23.2° to7.85°) after surgery. The postoperative angles were maintained during follow-up, for both the calcaneal pitch (13.89°) and Meary”s angle (8.67°) in patients with the Kalix in situ (n=9/26) and in patients with the Kalix removed (15.4° and 7.8° respectively, n=17/26). The patient satisfaction survey shows that the majority of patients were satisfied regarding the state (81%) and appearance (75%) of their feet at follow-up. The majority never complained about their feet (81%) and heavy exercise was the major cause of complaints (23%). Limitations during walking were usually not the case (81%), though some patient experienced limitations during running (57%). Most reported preoperative complaints were pain, walking problems or a combination of both. The majority of these are relieved after surgery and patients were still asymptomatic at follow up. Conclusion. Kalix implantation improves the calcaneal pitch and Meary”s angle, thereby restoring foot anatomy towards a normal anatomy. These improvements were observed directly postoperatively and remained at follow-up. In addition, relieve of symptoms was observed postoperatively and the majority of patients were even satisfied at follow-up. We therefore suggest that Kalix arthroereisis is an appropriate treatment option for pediatric patients with symptomatic flexible flat feet. Significance. This was the first study evaluating functional and radiological outcomes of the Kalix arthroereisis in patients with symptomatic flexible flat feet

Summary Statement. Service industry metrics (the net promoter score) are being introduced as a measure of UK healthcare satisfaction. Lower limb arthroplasty, as a ‘service’, scores comparably with the most successful commercial organisations. Background. Satisfaction with care is important to both the patient and the payer. The Net Promoter Score, widely used in the service industry, has been recently introduced to the UK National Health Service as an overarching metric of patient satisfaction and to monitor performance. This questionnaire asks ‘customers’ if they would recommend a service or products to others. Scores range from −100 (everyone is a detractor) to +100 (everyone is a promoter). In industry, a positive score is well regarded, with those over 50 regarded as excellent. Our aims were to assess net promoter scores for joint arthroplasty, to compare these scores with direct measures of patient satisfaction, and to evaluate which factors contributed to net promoter response. Methods. 6912 individuals undergoing primary lower limb joint replacement over a five year period (Jan 2007 – Dec 2011) took part in a prospective cohort study at a single NHS University hospital. Net promoter score, clinical outcomes as measured by PROMS (Oxford Hip or Knee Score and SF-12 score), multi-faceted patient satisfaction questionnaire, demographic data and length of hospital stay were recorded. Data was collected preoperatively and at 1 year post-surgery. Multivariate regression was performed to determine which factors could predict an outcome of ‘promoter’ and ‘detractor’ at 1 year post-surgery. Significance was accepted at p = 0.1 to accommodate the confounding effect of other variables. Results. Net promoter scores for knee and hip replacements were 49 and 71 respectively. Strong correlation was seen between overall satisfaction and whether the patient would recommend the operation to another (r = 0.637), though regression of these factors was modest (R. 2. = 0.406). Only 4 factors were relevant to the net promoter response: pain relief (OR 2.13, CI 1.83 – 2.49), meeting expectations (OR 2.57, CI 2.24 – 2.97), hospital experience (OR 2.33, CI 2.03 – 2.68) and arthroplasty type (OR 2.31, CI 1.68 – 3.17). These factors drove a model able to explain 95% of the variation in net promoter score. Conclusions. This is the first analysis of net promoter score for joint arthroplasty, and demonstrates values that compare favourably with the services provided by the most successful commercial organizations. The UK Department of Health describes this score as a measure of patient satisfaction. This is perhaps not completely accurate, as only a third of the variation in one response can be explained by the other, suggesting that although clearly related, these concepts are not the same. Pain relief, meeting of expectations of surgery, the hospital experience and whether the hip or knee joint is replaced are the only relevant factors in determining the net promoter response. Factors thought to influence clinical outcome such as depression, number of comorbidities, age and gender carry no influence with this metric