Aim. Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) are severe complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Up to now, a gold standard in the diagnostics of PJI is missing. Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are secreted by all types of cells and play a key role in immune response in presence of infection (1). In this prospective study, the diagnostic accuracy of sEVs in the synovial fluid to detect PJI of knee, hip and shoulder joints was investigated. We hypothesized increased surface markers of sEVs in PJI compared to aseptic complications (e.g. implant loosening, stress shielding related pain). Method. Synovial fluid from 48 patients with painful arthroplasty was examined. The distinction between aseptic and infectious cases was made on the basis of the 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection (2). 35 (72,9%) probands assigned to aseptic and 13 patients (27,1%) to PJI group. Immuno-fluorescence flow cytometry served to document the concentrations of CD9, CD63, CD66b, CD82 and HLA-DR on sEVs. Results. The concentration of CD9 surface marker on sEVs in synovial fluid was significantly lower (p=0.002) in PJI group than in aseptic group. In contrast, the levels of CD82 on sEVs in synovial fluid was significantly higher (p<0.0001) in the PJI group than in aseptic group. The concentrations of CD63, CD66b and HLA-DR on sEVs in synovial fluid did not differ significantly between the two cohorts (CD63: p=0.372; CD66b: p=0.634; HLA-DR: p=0.558). Conclusions. Overall, the significance of sEVs in the diagnostics of PJI is not well enough understood and the subject of current research and scientific discussion. Our data suggest, that CD82 and CD9 on sEVs in synovial fluid are promising biomarkers to differentiate between PJI and aseptic complications

The incidence of PJI in knee replacements is 2.8% and slightly lower with hip replacement surgery. PJI make up 15% (or even more) of knee revisions. To combat PJI, antibiotic laden bone cement has been used for many decades, but antibiotic stewardship dictates more prudent management of antimicrobials. Projected increase in infection rate, due to increased surgery and latent infection to be almost 5-fold up to 2035.

Biofilm is a complex structure of bacteria and polysaccharide matrix and, is recognised as a major component in PJI and other orthopaedic infections.

Biofilm is responsible for high incidence of resistance to antimicrobials and ineffective host immune response.

Aim

Candida species are uncommon pathogens causing prosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study evaluated the surgical management and outcome of Candida PJI.

The treatment of orthopedic implant infections is often difficult and complex, although the chances of successful treatment with a properly selected diagnostic, surgical and antibiotic treatment protocol have recently increased significantly. Surgical treatment is a key factor in the treatment of infections of orthopedic implants, and any errors in this respect often lead to worse clinical outcomes.

Surgical errors. The most important and frequent surgical errors include:

- conservative treatment of periprosthetic infections with antibiotics alone: successful treatment requires adequate surgical procedure combined with long-term antimicrobial Th that is active against biofilm microorganism. Without adequate surgical procedure just the suppression of symptoms is usually achieved, rather than eradication of the infection.

We present illustrative cases with each common surcical error combined with proper solution.

Treatment of PJI is a demanding procedure, the goal is a long-term pain-free functional joint, that can be achieved by eradication of the infection. For a successful clinical outcome an appropriate diagnostic, surgical and antimicrobial procedure for the individual patient has to be selected.

The use of a cemented implant instead of a spacer has been proposed due to the improved function in comparison with a spacer. Unfortunately the removal of a conventional cemented stem can be challenging. The use of a short cemented stem can overcome this problem.

Between July 2011 and May 2013, 10 infected hips were treated with a short cemented stem as a spacer. The infected implants were cemented in 6 cases and cementless in 4 cases. Mean time from index operation was 3 years (range 0 to 8 years). It was the first treatment for infection in all cases. Antibiotic loaded cement and an all-poly cup was used in all cases. The bugs were staph aureus and staph epidermidis in most cases. A Friendly short cemented stem with specific cement restrictor and standard cementing tecnique was used in all cases. This stem has been successfully tested in over 200 patients and approved by TUV to be released on the marked.

In all cases, the infection was successfully cured with antibiotics for a period ranging from 3 to 5 months. 2 patients were revised after the infection was cured for recurrent dislocation. No recurrent infection was found at the latest follow up.

One stage revision is gaining in popularity for the decreased morbidity and better quality of life of the patients. Weak points of one-stage revision are slightly inferior results in terms of eradication of the infection and the fact that it can be done only with cemented implants. Cemented implants show inferior durability than cementless implants and are difficult to remove if revision is needed. The use of a short cemented stem can couple the advantages of one stage revision and the fact that it is easily removed if this is needed for various reasons (aseptic loosening, recurrent dislocation and periprosthetic fracture). Contraindications to this technique are severe bone loss in the acetabulum or in the proximal femur.

Purpose. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection is widely used for symptomatic relief of knee osteoarthritis. However, if pain is not improved which consequences a total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is a potential risk of post-operative periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of this study is to investigate whether the use of preoperative intra-articular corticosteroid injection increases the risk of PJI and to investigate a time frame in which the risk of subsequent infection is significantly increased. Methods. A systematic search was performed in PubMed (Medline), Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were original studies investigating the rate of PJI in patients receiving pre-operative intra-articular corticosteroid injection compared to controls. Results. A total of 380 unique articles were screened. Six studies met the inclusion criteria with 255,627 patients in total. Overall, no statistical significance was observed in the intra-articular infection rate in corticosteroid compared to controls groups. However, intra-articular corticosteroid injections within 3 months prior to TKA were associated with a significantly increased risk of infection (OR: 1.52, 95% CI 1.37–1.67, p < 0.01); this was not observed in the 6-month period (OR: 1.05, 95% CI 0.80–1.39, p = 0.72). Conclusions. Performing an intra-articular corticosteroid injection within 3 months prior to TKA is associated with a significantly increased risk of PJI. The current evidence supports the safe use of intra-articular corticosteroid injection more than 6 months before TKA. However, additional studies are needed to clarify the risk of PJI after TKA implantation between 3 and 6 months after the last corticoid injection

Aim. Sepsis is a life-threatening complication of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) that requires early and effective therapy. This study aims to investigate the epidemiology, associated risk factors, and outcome of sepsis in the context of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). Method. This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients treated for PJI from 2017 to 2020. Patients were classified based on the criteria of the European Bone and Joint Infection Society. The presence of sepsis was determined using the SOFA score and SIRS criteria. The cohort with PJI and sepsis (sepsis) was compared to patients with PJI without sepsis (non-sepsis). Risk factors considered were patient characteristics, affected joints, surgical therapy, microbiological findings, preexisting medical conditions, clinical symptoms, and symptom duration. Outcome parameters were mortality, length of hospital stay, and length of stay in the intensive care unit. Results. A total of 109 patients with PJI were identified, of whom 45 patients (41.3%) met the criteria for sepsis. Patients with sepsis had more severe preexisting diseases compared with the non-sepsis cohort (Charlson Comorbidity Index 3.8 vs. 2.8; p≤0.001). An increased odds ratio (OR) for a septic course was found for the comorbidities pneumonia (8.2; p=0.001), myocardial infarction (2.0; p=0.02), atrial fibrillation (3.3; p=0.01), diabetes mellitus (1.2; p=0.04), endocarditis (5.5; p=0.01), and renal disease (2.0; p≤0.001). Infection with Staphylococcus aureus (sepsis 20 vs. non-sepsis 10; p=0.002), Streptococcus dysgalactiae (sepsis 7 vs. non-sepsis 2; p=0.002) and Candida albicans (sepsis 5 vs. non-sepsis 0; p=0.01) were more prevalent in patients with sepsis. In the sepsis cohort, further infectious foci were present in addition to PJI in 57.8% of patients, compared to 18.8% in the non-sepsis cohort. The presence of sepsis was associated with a longer hospital stay (sepsis 68 days vs. non-sepsis 38 days; p=0.001) and longer intensive care unit stay (sepsis 12 days vs. non-sepsis 2 days; p=0.001). In-hospital mortality was ten times higher in the sepsis cohort compared to non-septic patients (sepsis 11/42 vs. non-sepsis 2/64; OR 10.3; p=0.01). Conclusions. In a relevant proportion of patients, PJI can lead to a septic course of disease associated with increased mortality. Particularly in patients with preexisting diseases, increased attention is required, and comprehensive screening for other foci of infection seems mandatory. In addition to highly virulent pathogens such as staphylococci and streptococci, fungal infections should be considered as causative pathogens in septic patients with PJI

Aim. Dalbavancin is a novel second-generation lipoglycopeptide antibiotic with strong activity against many gram-positive bacteria and a prolonged half-life of 6–11 days. This allows a once-a-week intravenous application and therefore an outpatient intravenous therapy. Currently, only little is known about the use of Dalbavancin in Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of this retrospective study, was to compare the outcome of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) in patients who received dalbavancin (DAL) with patients which was treated by standard of care antimicrobial agents (SoC). Methods. Between 02/2017 and 02/2020 a total of 89 (42 male/47 female) patients with PJI of the hip 56/89 (62.9%) and knee 33/89 (37.1%) who received at least one dosage of Dalbavancin were included. A 1:1 propensity-score (PS) matching between the DAL-group (n=89) and the SoC-group (n=89) was performed, using defined demographic covariates such as body-mass-index, age, sex, causative pathogens, knee or hip joint and infection after primary or revision surgery, surgical site infections, Charlson-comorbidity index and the types of infection (acute, late acute and chronic). Patient's demographics were analysed by our prospectively maintained institutional arthroplasty registry and PJI database. We analysed the outcome of the included patients evaluate the re-infection and re-revision rate and gave details about surgical management and the type of PJI with a minimum follow-up of one year. Results. Microbiological and clinical successes were achieved in 69 (77.5%) patients of the DAL-group and in 66 (74.2%) patients of the SoC-group. In the DAL-group 13 (14.6%) and in the SoC-group 12 (13.5%) patients had an infection related re-revision. Median follow-up was 706 (369; 1310) days in the DAL-group and 1329 (9; 3,549) days in the SoC-group. Overall, polymicrobial infections were found in 20 procedures (DAL-group: 10; SoC-group: 10) and monomicrobial infections in 154 (DAL-group: 75; SoC-group: 79). Polymicrobial infections were found in 20 patients and monomicrobial infections in 154. The most common microorganisms were Staphylococcus epidermidis n=63 (32.3%), Staphylococcus aureus n=27 (13.8%) and Cutibacterium spp. n=22 (11.3%). There are significantly less Gram-positive microorganisms (p=0.034) after re-revisions in patients with DAL treatment. Conclusions. Dalbavancin has excellent safety and high clinical effectiveness for Gram-positive PJIs

Aims. Delayed postoperative inoculation of orthopaedic implants with persistent wound drainage or bacterial seeding of a haematoma can result in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of this in vivo study was to compare the efficacy of vancomycin powder with vancomycin-eluting calcium sulphate beads in preventing PJI due to delayed inoculation. Methods. A mouse model of PJI of the knee was used. Mice were randomized into groups with intervention at the time of surgery (postoperative day (POD) 0): a sterile control (SC; n = 6); infected control (IC; n = 15); systemic vancomycin (SV; n = 9); vancomycin powder (VP; n = 21); and vancomycin bead (VB; n = 19) groups. Delayed inoculation was introduced during an arthrotomy on POD 7 with 1 × 10. 5. colony-forming units (CFUs) of a bioluminescent strain of Staphylococcus aureus. The bacterial burden was monitored using bioluminescence in vivo. All mice were killed on POD 21. Implants and soft-tissue were harvested and sonicated for analysis of the CFUs. Results. The mean in vivo bioluminescence in the VB group was significantly lower on POD 8 and POD 10 compared with the other groups. There was a significant 1.3-log. 10. (95%) and 1.5-log. 10. (97%) reduction in mean soft-tissue CFUs in the VB group compared with the VP and IC groups (3.6 × 10. 3. vs 7.0 × 10. 4. ; p = 0.022; 3.6 × 10. 3. vs 1.0 × 10. 5. ; p = 0.007, respectively) at POD 21. There was a significant 1.6-log. 10. (98%) reduction in mean implant CFUs in the VB group compared with the IC group (1.3 × 10. 0. vs 4.7 × 10. 1. , respectively; p = 0.038). Combined soft-tissue and implant infection was prevented in 10 of 19 mice (53%) in the VB group as opposed to 5 of 21 (24%) in the VP group, 3 of 15 (20%) in the IC group, and 0% in the SV group. Conclusion. In our in vivo mouse model, antibiotic-releasing calcium sulphate beads appeared to outperform vancomycin powder alone in lowering the bacterial burden and preventing soft-tissue and implant infections. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(6):632–638

Aim. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most frequent and devastating complications of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Accurate diagnosis and proper treatment are essential to prevent functional loss and progression to systemic infection. However, the correct diagnosis of PJI is still a challenge since there is no accurate diagnostic method and the existing diagnostic criteria are based on serological, histological and microbiological tests that are imprecise and time-consuming. Recently, it was demonstrated that cell-free DNA is increased in the synovial fluid of patients with PJI. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate a new point-of-care methodology for quantifying free DNA in synovial fluid. Method. A prospective study was carried out with patients undergoing TKA revision surgery, from whom it was possible to collect synovial fluid (SF) during the surgical procedure. Cell-free DNA quantification was performed directly from the SF, using a portable fluorimeter. Sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were calculated. Results. Fifty-four patients were included in the study, of which 25 were diagnosed with PJI. Cell-free DNA levels measured immediately after collection were increased in the synovial fluid of patients with PJI (26.3 ± 14.8) in comparison with the uninfected group (4.6 ng/ml ± 3.8, p< 0.0001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC) was 0.981 (95% CI 0.914 to 0.999). Conclusions. From the results presented, we can conclude that the quantification of free DNA with a portable fluorimeter proved to be a test with high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of PJI

Aim. Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) is a devastating complication in hip and knee joint arthroplasty. The “JS BACH” classification system was developed in 2021 to stratify the complexity of PJI, and more importantly, to act as a tool to guide referrals to specialist centers. The “JS BACH” classification has not been validated in an external cohort. This study aimed to do so using a large prospective cohort from Australia and New Zealand. Method. We applied the JS-BACH classification to the Prosthetic Joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand Observational (PIANO) cohort. This prospective study of newly diagnosed PJI collected 2-year outcome data from 653 participants enrolled in 27 hospitals. The definition of PJI treatment failure at 24 months was any of the following: death, clinical or microbiological signs of infection, destination prosthesis removed, or ongoing antibiotic use. Results. Individual cases were classified as per JS-BACH into “1 - uncomplicated” (n = 268), “2 - complex” (n = 330), and “3 - limited options” (n = 55). This cohort was similar to the original JS-BACH population in terms of baseline characteristics. However, there was a difference in complexity, with more DAIR procedures, fewer revision procedures, and a higher proportion of uncomplicated patients in the PIANO cohort. The risk of treatment failure correlated strongly with the JS-BACH category, with odds ratios (95% CI [confidence interval]) for category 2 versus 1 of 1.75 (1.24 to 2.47) and for category 3 versus 1 of 7.12 (3.42 to 16.02). Conclusions. Despite the PIANO study population being less complicated than the original derivation cohort, the JS-BACH classification showed a clear association with treatment failure in this large external cohort

Aim. This study aimed to externally validate promising preoperative PJI prediction models in a recent, multinational European cohort. Method. Three preoperative PJI prediction models (by Tan et al., Del Toro et al., and Bülow et al.) which previously demonstrated high levels of accuracy were selected for validation. A multicenter retrospective observational analysis was performed of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between January 2020 and December 2021 and treated at centers in the Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain. Patient characteristics were compared between our cohort and those used to develop the prediction models. Model performance was assessed through discrimination and calibration. Results. A total of 2684 patients were included of whom 60 developed a PJI (2.2%). Our patient cohort differed from the models’ original cohorts in terms of demographic variables, procedural variables, and the prevalence of comorbidities. The c-statistics for the Tan, Del Toro, and Bülow models were 0.72, 0.69, and 0.72 respectively. Calibration was reasonable, but precise percentage estimates for PJI risk were most accurate for predicted risks up to 3-4%; the Tan model overestimated risks above 4%, while the Del Toro model underestimated risks above 3%. Conclusions. In this multinational cohort study, the Tan, Del Toro, and Bülow PJI prediction models were found to be externally valid for classifying high risk patients for developing a PJI. These models hold promise for clinical application to enhance preoperative patient counseling and targeted prevention strategies. Keywords. Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI), High Risk Groups, Prediction Models, Validation, Infection Prevention

Aim. The number of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) is increasing due to ageing population and increasing numbers of arthroplasty procedures and treatment is costly. Aim of the study was to analyze the direct healthcare costs of PJI in Europe for total hip arthroplasties (THA) and total knee arthroplasties (TKA). Method. A systematic review in PubMed with search of direct costs of PJI in European countries was performed. Thereby the term cost* AND (infection OR PJI) AND (prosthesis OR knee OR hip OR “TKA” OR “THA” OR arthroplast*) was combined with each European country to detect relevant publications. Publications with definition of performed procedure and joint localization were included into further analysis. The mean value of direct healthcare cost was calculated for the respective joint and the respective operation performed. Results. Screening revealed 1,274 eligible publications. After review of abstracts and full-texts n=11 manuscripts were included into final analysis (Figure 1). The mean combined direct hospital costs for revision for PJI after TKA and THA was 26,311€. Mean costs for revision procedures for PJI after TKA were 24,617€. Direct costs for TKA-PJI treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) were on average 10,121€. For two-stage revisions in knee arthroplasties total average costs were 30,829€. Referring to revision surgery for PJI in THA, the mean hospital costs in Europe were 28,005€. For a DAIR procedure direct healthcare costs of 5,528€ were identified. Two-stage revision cost on average 31,217€. Conclusions. PJIs are associated with significant direct healthcare costs. The financial burden of up to 30,000 € per case underlines the impact of the disease for European health care system. However, the number of detailed reports on PJI costs is limited and the quality of the literature is limited. There is a strong need for more detailed financial data on the costs of PJI treatment. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Background. Increasing evidence suggests a link between the bearing surface used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the occurrence of infection. It is postulated that polyethylene has immunomodulatory effects and may influence bacterial function and survival, thereby impacting the development of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study aimed to investigate the association between polyethylene type and revision surgery for PJI in THA using data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). We hypothesized that the use of XLPE would demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in revision rates due to PJI compared to N-XLPE. Methods. Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) spanning September 1, 1999, to December 31, 2021, were used to compare the infection revision rates between THA using N-XLPE and XLPE. We calculated the Cumulative Percentage Revision rate (CPR) and Hazard Ratio (HR) while controlling for factors like age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists’ (ASA) grade, and head size. Results. From the total 361,083 primary THAs, 26,827 used N-XLPE and 334,256 used XLPE. Excluding data from the first 6 months post-surgery, 220 revisions occurred in the N-XLPE group and 1,055 in the XLPE group for PJI. The HR for infection revision was significantly higher in N-XLPE compared to XLPE, at 1.64 (95% CI, 1.41–1.90, p<0.001). Conclusions. This analysis provides evidence of an association between N-XLPE and revision for infection in THA. We suspect that polyethylene wear particles contribute to the susceptibility of THA to PJI, resulting in a significantly higher risk of revision for infection in N-XLPE hips compared to those with XLPE. Level of Evidence. Therapeutic Level III

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in geriatric and/or multimorbid patients is an enormous challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. Revision procedures have also been demonstrated to expose patients to higher infection risks. Prior patient stratification according to presumed infection risks, followed by a more potent local antibiotic prophylaxis protocol with selective use of DALBC, is an interesting strategy to decrease the burden of PJI in high risk patients. The PubMed & EMBASE databases were screened for publications pertaining to the utilization of DALBC in cement for infection prophylaxis & prosthesis fixation. 6 preclinical & 7 clinical studies were identified which met the inclusion criteria and were stratified by level of clinical evidence. Only those studies were considered which compared the PJI outcome in the DALBC vs the SALBC group. (1). DALBC have been shown to exert a much stronger and longer lasting inhibition of biofilm formation on many PJI relevant bacteria (gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens) than single gentamicin-only containing cements. (2). DALBC use (COPAL G+C) in the intervention arm of 7 clinical studies has led to a significant reduction of PJI cases in a) cemented hemiarthroplasty procedures (3 studies, evidence level I and III), in b) cemented septic revision surgeries (2 studies, evidence level III), in c) cemented aseptic knee revisions (1 study, evidence level III) and in d) cemented primary arthroplasties in multi-morbid patients (1 study, evidence level III-IV). These benefits were not associated with more systemic side effects or a higher prevalence of broad antimicrobial resistancies. Use of DALBC is likely to be more effective in preventing PJI in high risk patients. The preliminar findings so far may encourage clinicians to consolidate this hypothesis on a wider clinical range

Aim. Megaprosthesis have become a standard option in limb preserving surgery after bone resection in musculoskeletal tumors. Recently they have also been used in complex revision arthroplasty in cases with massive bone loss. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) both in primary oncology cases and aseptic revision cases and analyze which are the significant risk factors for PJI with a special interest on the use of prophylactic antibiotic loaded calcium sulfate beads. Method. All patients undergoing surgery with the use of megaprosthesis in our institution between January/2012 and December/2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Data was collected from electronic medical records. We identified 108 procedures involving megaprosthesis in 90 patients with an average follow-up of 37 months. Indications were 79 primary musculoskeletal tumors and 29 aseptic complex revision arthroplasty. Results. Table 1 shows relevant clinical information. No significant risk factor was found either in uni or multivariate analysis. PJI rate was 15% (12/79) for primary musculoskeletal surgery and 31% (9/29) for complex revision surgery. The use of antibiotic loaded calcium sulfate beads did not show an advantage – 22% (9/41) with vs. 18% (12/67) without. Conclusions. In this relatively small series it was not possible to show a significal association between PJI and certain known risk factors such as gender, ASA score, site of surgery (knee) and revision surgery. The use of antibiotic loaded calcium sulfate beads as prophylaxis was not beneficial in reducing PJI rates in our cohort. We acknowledge the limitations of our study: a small sample group, in a single institution with heterogeneity in terms of diagnosis and surgical site. We recognize the need for a multicentric study with a larger cohort to validate these findings. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aim. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and periprosthetic fracture (PF) are one of the most devastating complications in arthroplasty. Each complication by itself is challenging to solve. Yet, simultaneously, both complications are inconceivably complex to deal with, while the treatment regimen of PJI and PF are contradictory. Chronic PJI most often requires implant removal, while PF requires stability, regularly achieved by stable osteosynthesis. This study aims to (1) analyse the success rate of PJI with following concomitant PF during the treatment course in total hip arthroplasties (THA) and (2) to determine the risk factors for reinfection and subsequent revision surgery after treatment of PJI and PF. Method. This restrospective study analyzed 41 patients with concomitant PJI and PF during the PJI treatment period from 2013 to 2022 involving THA. Patients were divided in two cohorts termed success and failure and were statistically compared. The median follow-up time was 66 months (>12 months). All patients were considered individually and treated according to their individual needs in fracture and infection treatment. Re-arthroplasty survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Relevant risk factors were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test or Chi-square, depending on the variable's scale. Results. The overall success rate of our cohort was 70,7%. Twelve patients required re-operation due to reinfection, resulting in a cumulative 12-month-reinfection rate of 19,5%. The estimated cumulative reinfection free survival rate was 68,3%. Significance in risk factors for failure were found in pathogen virulence grade, Difficult to treat pathogen and number of debridement during interval. On average the Harris Hip score was 66 in the group of reinfection compared to 77 in the group of success. Conclusions. Reoperation and re-infection rate remains high in patients with simultaneous PJI and PF in THA. Due to the heterogeneity of the fractures, soft tissue conditions and pathogens found, treatment must be individualised to salvage the limb. However, small cohorts impact the statistical strength negatively due to instances of two rare complications

Aim. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devasting complication after total hip arthroplasty. Joint aspiration and preoperative biopsy can be helpful diagnostics for PJI. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of preoperative biopsies after inconclusive or dry tap aspiration of the hip in patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty. Secondarily we will evaluate the diagnostic value of synovial fluid aspiration cultures and peroperative tissue cultures for diagnosing or ruling out PJI. Methods. Patients who underwent diagnostic aspiration and subsequent preoperative biopsy and/or revision surgery between January 2015 and January 2024 were included in the study. Synovial fluid aspirations and tissue samples obtained from biopsy and revision surgery were interpreted using the European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria for PJI and in close consultation with the microbiologist. Results. 207 Patients were included with 231 synovial fluid aspirations. Sensitivity and specificity of synovial fluid aspiration cultures were 76% and 98%. In 62 patients tissue biopsies were performed, of which 40 after a dry tap. The tissue biopsies after a dry tap aspiration had a sensitivity of 50.0% and a specificity of 95.8%. In 21% tissue biopsies led to the confirmation of PJI in patient with a high suspicion of PJI after dry tap aspiration. In patients with an inconclusive synovial fluid aspiration result the addition of tissue biopsies led to a change in treatment in 14%. In 212 cases revision surgery was performed, intraoperative tissue cultures had a sensitivity and specificity of 83.3% and 99.3%. Conclusions. Diagnosing PJI can be troublesome, especially if synovial fluid aspiration provides a dry tap. Tissue biopsy cultures in patients with a high suspicion of PJI after dry tap aspiration is a feasible way to confirm PJI, in 21% of patients PJI could be confirmed after dry tap aspiration. Ruling out PJI by means of a biopsy after a dry tap aspiration is less successful due to its low sensitivity. Tissue biopsies after an inconclusive aspiration leads to clinically important treatment changes

Aim. Diagnosing low-grade periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) can be very challenging due to low-virulent microorganisms capable of forming biofilm. Clinical signs can be subtle and may be similar to those of aseptic failure. To minimize morbidity and mortality and to preserve quality of life, accurate diagnosis is essential. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of various diagnostic tests in diagnosing low-grade PJI. Methods. Patients undergoing revision surgery after total hip and knee arthroplasty were included in this retrospective cohort study. A standardized diagnostic workup was performed using the components of the 2021 European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) definition of PJI. For statistical analyses, the respective test was excluded from the infection definition to eliminate incorporation bias. Receiver-operating-characteristic curves were used to calculate the diagnostic performance of each test, and their area-under-the-curves (AUC) were compared using the z-test. Results. 422 patients undergoing revision surgery after total hip and knee arthroplasty were included in this study. 208 cases (49.3%) were diagnosed as septic. Of those, 60 infections (28.8%) were defined as low-grade PJI (symptoms >4 weeks and caused by low-virulent microorganisms (e. g. coagulase-negative staphylococci, Cutibacterium spp., enterococci and Actinomyces)). Performances of the different test methods are listed in Table 1. Synovial fluid (SF) - WBC (white blood cell count) >3000G/L (0.902), SF - %PMN (percentage of polymorphonuclear neutrophils) > 65% (0.959), histology (0.948), and frozen section (0.925) showed the best AUCs. Conclusion. The confirmatory criteria according to the EBJIS definition showed almost ideal performances in ruling-in PJI (>99% specificity). Histology and synovial fluid cell count (SF-WBC and SF-%PMN) showed excellent accuracies for diagnosing low-grade PJI. However, a reduced immune reaction in these cases may necessitate lower cut-off values. Intraoperative frozen section may be valuable in cases with inconclusive preoperative diagnosis. For any tables or figures, please contact the authors directly

Aim. Predicting success of a Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) procedure for Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) remains a challenge. A failed DAIR might adversely affect the outcome of any future revision surgery for PJI. Hence, the ability to identify and optimise factors predictive of DAIR success would help target the procedure to the appropriate patient cohort and avoid unnecessary surgery for patients where a DAIR is unlikely to eradicate infection. Method. A retrospective review of our prospective Bone Infection Group database was performed to identify all patients who underwent a DAIR of their hip or knee arthroplasty. Diagnosis of PJI was confirmed using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) 2013 and the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) 2021 classification systems. DAIR surgery was grouped into “successful” or “unsuccessful” outcomes as per the MSIS working group outcome-reporting tool. Results. Sixty-Four consecutive patients with an acute PJI underwent a DAIR procedure between 2009 and 2020. Treatment was successful in 44 (69%). The chance of a successful DAIR was significantly greater if performed within one week of symptom onset compared to greater than one week duration (adjusted odds ratio (OR 0.11; p=0.027; 95% CI [0.02- 0.78]). The chances of a successful DAIR was not influenced by whether the surgeon was an arthroplasty or non-arthroplasty surgeon (OR 0.28; p=0.13; 95% CI [0.05- 1.48]). Isolated Streptococcus infection had a success rate of 100%; followed by Coagulasenegative Staphylococci 71% and Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus 65%. Polymicrobial infection had the worst outcome with a success rate of 47%. Conclusions. In our experience DAIR surgery performed within one week of symptom onset, significantly increased chances of successful infection eradication. Collaborative work is required to ensure arthroplasty patients access prompt appropriate surgical decision-making, remove barriers to early assessment and minimise delays to surgery