Aims. The aim of this study was to compare the longer-term outcomes of operatively and nonoperatively managed patients treated with a removable brace (fixed-angle removable orthosis) or a plaster cast immobilization for an acute ankle fracture. Methods. This is a secondary analysis of a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing adults with an acute ankle fracture, initially managed either by operative or nonoperative care. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either a cast immobilization or a fixed-angle removable orthosis (removable brace). Data were collected on baseline characteristics, ankle function, quality of life, and complications. The Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) was the primary outcome which was used to measure the participant’s ankle function. The primary endpoint was at 16 weeks, with longer-term follow-up at 24 weeks and two years. Results. Overall, 436 patients (65%) completed the final two-year follow-up. The mean difference in OMAS at two years was -0.3 points favouring the plaster cast (95% confidence interval -3.9 to 3.4), indicating no statistically significant difference between the interventions. There was no evidence of differences in patient quality of life (measured using the EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire) or Disability Rating Index. Conclusion. This study demonstrated that patients treated with a removable brace had similar outcomes to those treated with a plaster cast in the first two years after injury. A removable brace is an effective alternative to traditional immobilization in a plaster cast for patients with an ankle fracture. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(4):382–388

Purpose of the study: Infection is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in sickle cell anemia children. It often triggers an acute episode of anemia with thrombosis. Bone and joint infections are particularly frequent. Diagnosis can be difficult and is sometimes established late. Material and methods: We analyzed retrospectively the cases of 39 children with sickle cell anemia who presented one or more bone and joint infections during a six-year period (January 1998-December 2003). Results: Bone and joint infection involved 14% of all sickle cell children hospitalized during the study period. Mean age was nine years, with no gender predominance. Homozygous subjects were more exposed to infection (73%). The infection revealed the disease in 13% of the children. The rate of bone and joint infection was 62% compared with 38% for osteomyelitis; salmonella were isolated in 38% of cases. Medical treatment with adapted antibiotics and plaster cast immobilization were instituted in all cases and associated with surgical treatment in 25% (arthrotomy for evacuation of purulent collections, cleaning, resection of infected tissue). Outcome was favorable in 77% of cases (cured infection, resumed school activities). Discussion: The frequency of bone and joint infections in sickle cell anemia children in our series was similar to that reported in the literature (10–19%). Compared with children with normal hemoglobin, bone and joint infection in sickle cell anemia children present specific features in terms of localization, blood chemistry findings, causal bacteria, radiographic signs, and therapeutic modalities and sequelae. Conclusion: Sickle cell anemia is a serious hereditary disease. The risk of complications should lead to the development of preventive measures (screening at risk couples, institution of a prenuptial certificate, allogenic bone marrow graft)

Purpose: Knee dislocation is associated with blunt popliteal artery trauma in almost 30% of cases. In such injuries, prompt diagnosis and appropriate management is essential for limb salvage. Both our methods and outcomes of popliteal artery thrombosis treatment after knee dislocation are presented in this retrospective study. Methods: During the last six years, eight patients (all male, average age 25 years) were admitted to our hospital with knee dislocation and associated blunt popliteal artery thrombosis following automobile accidents (7/8) and fall from height (1/8). The average delay before accessing the emergency room was 14 hours (ranging from 2 to 24 hours). Seven patients were experiencing signs of distal ischemia (absence of distal pulses, motor and sensory loss) and one patient, admitted two hours after vehicle accident, was presented with absent distal pulses but maintained motor and sensory ability. Seven patients underwent external fixation and one plaster cast immobilization. In all cases, digital subtraction arteriography was performed. Results: All patients were treated by performing below knee femoropopliteal bypass, using reversed saphenous vein in seven cases and a vscs graft in one. All patients underwent fasciotomies. One above knee amputation was performed postoperatively while three patients experience permanent neurologic discrepancy. Conclusions: In any case of knee dislocation, there must be a high clinical suspicion of popliteal artery thrombosis. Meticulous and repeated physical examination and rapid admission to a department of vascular surgery are of vital importance for limb salvage and minimization of amputation rate and permanent neurologic deficiency

Introduction: In the management of patients with bone neoplasm, we are confronted with various status which is difficult to treat. External fixation is useful for such status, and result in succes. The purpose of this study is to report that patients of bone neoplasms were treated with external fixation. Materials and methods: Fifteen patients with bone neoplasm who had treated by external fixation are an objective of this study, between 1989 and 2000. Clinical and pathological diagnosis is osteosarcoma in 7, giant cell tumor in 4, Ewing’s sarcoma in 1, chondrosarcoma in1, osteochondroma in 1, enchondroma in 1. Patients were divided into 4 groups depends on difference of indication of external fixation. Result. Group 1. Immobilization of pathological fracture. Two patients with osteosarcoma of femur and one patient with GCT of humerus were treated by external fixation for their pathological fracture. Group 2. Bone lengthening or correction for bone defect or deformity. We performed external fixation with Ilizarov fixator for bone lengthening following bone defect after tumor excision in 4 patients. Mean length of bone defect was 83.5 (22–150) mm. Two in 4 cases were stopped bone lengthening owing to local recurrence and progression of disease. And in 2 patients, we performed correction with external fixation for bone deformity arised by enchondroma of humerus and osteochondroma of ulna. Group 3. Stabilization for vascularized bone graft. We performed vascularized fibular graft after wide resection and stabilized with external fixator in 2 patients with humeral sarcoma. Group 4. Salvage of infected prosthesis. There were 4 patients with infected prosthesis. Three of them were treated by bone lengthening technique after removal of prosthesis. Mean length of bone defect was 264 (220–330) mm and mean term of fitting external fixator was 583.7 (442–726) days. Discussion: Advantages of treatment with external fixation for bone defect, bone deformity and pathological fracture arise from bone neoplasm are mentioned as follows. It could immobilize pathological fracture that is difficult for plaster cast immobilization. It could compensate for bone defect following tumor resection. It is useful method for salvage of the infected prosthesis. Disadvantages of using of external fixation are mentioned as follows. In case of bone lengthening, it is need to perform a complete tumor control. Treatment term is longer. It is need pin site management. Treatment with external fixation is one of the useful method for pathological fracture, bone deformity, shortening, bone defect and infected prosthesis arise from bone neoplasm

The August 2023 Trauma Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: A comparison of functional cast and volar-flexion ulnar deviation for dorsally displaced distal radius fractures; Give your stable ankle fractures some AIR!; Early stabilization of rib fractures – an effective thing to do?; Locked plating versus nailing for proximal tibia fractures: A multicentre randomized controlled trial; Time to flap coverage in open tibia fractures; Does tranexamic acid affect the incidence of heterotropic ossification around the elbow?; High BMI – good or bad in surgical fixation of hip fractures?

Aims

This study sought to estimate the clinical outcomes and describe the nationwide variation in practice, as part of the feasibility workup for a National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended randomized clinical trial to determine the optimal treatment of torus fractures of the distal radius in children.

Aims

Torus fractures of the distal radius are the most common fractures in children. The NICE non-complex fracture guidelines recently concluded that bandaging was probably the optimal treatment for these injuries. However, across the UK current treatment varies widely due to a lack of evidence underpinning the guidelines. The Forearm Fracture Recovery in Children Evaluation (FORCE) trial evaluates the effect of a soft bandage and immediate discharge compared with rigid immobilization.

Aims

Torus fractures are the most common childhood fracture, accounting for 500,000 UK emergency attendances per year. UK treatment varies widely due to lack of scientific evidence. This is the protocol for a randomized controlled equivalence trial of ‘the offer of a soft bandage and immediate discharge’ versus ‘rigid immobilization and follow-up as per the protocol of the treating centre’ in the treatment of torus fractures .