Aim. Computer assisted total knee arthroplasty may have advantages over conventional surgery with respect to component positioning. Femoral component mal-rotation has been shown to be associated with poor outcomes, and may be related to posterior referencing jigs. We aimed to determine the variation between the transepicondylar axis (TEA) and posterior condylar axis (PCA) in a series of knees undergoing navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to determine the correlation between final intra-operative and post-operative coronal alignment. Method. A review of 184 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA between June 2007 and August 2010, using Precision navigation and Triathlon implants (Stryker). The difference between the TEA and PCA was measured as was the initial and final coronal alignment. A standing four foot alignment radiograph was obtained 6 weeks after surgery to determine the weight-bearing mechanical axis. Results. The mean difference between the TEA and PCA was 3.94 degrees (−2.80 to 11.59) and median difference was 3.6 degrees. Females and valgus knees had a greater variation. The mean intra-operative alignment was 0.75 degrees (−3 to 6, SD 1.9) and the mean radiographic alignment was 1.24 degrees (−6.5 to 6.5, SD 1.6). The intra-operative and radiographic alignment showed correlation (coefficient 0.43). There was poor correlation between pre-operative deformity and degree of difference between intra-operative and radiographic alignment (coefficient −0.1). Conclusion. There is a wide variation in the difference between the TEA and PCA, and there is not a good relationship with coronal alignment. Although most valgus knees had a bigger difference, such a difference was also seen in many varus knees. This should alert the surgeon when using posterior referencing jigs when determining the femoral component size and rotation. There was reasonable correlation between the final intra-operative mechanical alignment and the weight-bearing alignment as determined by a standing radiograph

Computer assisted total knee arthroplasty may have advantages over conventional surgery with respect to component positioning. Femoral component mal-rotation has been shown to be associated with poor outcomes, and may be related to posterior referencing jigs. We aimed to determine the variation between the transepicondylar axis (TEA) and posterior condylar axis (PCA) in a series of knees undergoing navigated total knee arthroplasty, and to determine the correlation between final intra-operative coronal alignment and post-operative radiographic functional alignment. A review of 170 consecutive patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty between June 2007 and August 2010, using Precision navigation and Triathlon implants (Stryker). The difference between the TEA and PCA was measured as was the initial coronal alignment. Referencing of the TEA had been previously validated against computerised tomography in a previous study. During arthroplasty, neutral alignment was aimed for, and the final alignment after implant insertion was recorded. Pre- and 1 year post-operative flexion was measured. A standing four foot alignment radiograph was obtained 6 weeks after surgery to determine the weight-bearing mechanical axis. The mean difference between the TEA and PCA was 3.94 degrees (−2.80 to 11.59) and median difference was 3.6 degrees. (A positive value implies the PCA is internally rotated with respect to the TEA). The median pre-operative flexion was 120 degrees (80–130) and the median post-operative flexion was 125 (85–145). The mean change in flexion was −2.5 degrees (−40 to 40; p=0.001). The mean intra-operative alignment was 0.75 degrees (−3 to 6, SD 1.9) and the mean radiographic alignment was 1.24 degrees (−6.5 to 6.5, SD 1.6). Taking −3 to +3 to be neutral, the outlier rate intra-operatively was 6.5% and radiographically was 16.5%. The intra-operative and radiographic alignment showed correlation (coefficient 0.289). There was poor correlation between pre-operative deformity and degree of difference between intra-operative and radiographic alignment (coefficient −0.1). Conclusion: There is a wide variation in the difference between the TEA and PCA, and there is not a good relationship with coronal alignment. Although most valgus knees had a bigger difference, such a difference was also seen in many varus knees. This should alert the surgeon when using posterior referencing jigs when determining the femoral component size and rotation. Although these patients achieved good post-operative flexion, this was determined by the pre-operative range. There was reasonable correlation between the final intra-operative mechanical alignment and the weight-bearing alignment as determined by a standing radiograph

At least four ways have been described to determine femoral component rotation, and three ways to determine tibial component rotation in total knee replacement (TKR). Each method has its advocates and each has an influence on knee kinematics and the ultimate short and long term success of TKR. Of the four femoral component methods, the author prefers rotating the femoral component in flexion to that amount that establishes a stable symmetrical flexion gap. This judgement is made after the soft tissues of the knee have been balanced in extension.

Of the three tibial component methods, the author prefers rotating the tibial component into congruency with the established femoral component rotation with the knee is in extension. This yields a rotationally congruent articulation during weight-bearing and should minimise the torsional forces being transferred through a conforming tibial insert, which could lead to wear to the underside of the tibial polyethylene. Rotating platform components will compensate for any mal-rotation, but can still lead to pain if excessive tibial insert rotation causes soft-tissue impingement.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B, Supple A:140–3.

Aims. Hip arthroplasty aims to accurately recreate joint biomechanics. Considerable attention has been paid to vertical and horizontal offset, but femoral head centre in the anteroposterior (AP) plane has received little attention. This study investigates the accuracy of restoration of joint centre of rotation in the AP plane. Methods. Postoperative CT scans of 40 patients who underwent unilateral uncemented total hip arthroplasty were analyzed. Anteroposterior offset (APO) and femoral anteversion were measured on both the operated and non-operated sides. Sagittal tilt of the femoral stem was also measured. APO measured on axial slices was defined as the perpendicular distance between a line drawn from the anterior most point of the proximal femur (anterior reference line) to the centre of the femoral head. The anterior reference line was made parallel to the posterior condylar axis of the knee to correct for rotation. Results. Overall, 26/40 hips had a centre of rotation displaced posteriorly compared to the contralateral hip, increasing to 33/40 once corrected for sagittal tilt, with a mean posterior displacement of 7 mm. Linear regression analysis indicated that stem anteversion needed to be increased by 10.8° to recreate the head centre in the AP plane. Merely matching the native version would result in a 12 mm posterior displacement. Conclusion. This study demonstrates the significant incidence of posterior displacement of the head centre in uncemented hip arthroplasty. Effects of such displacement include a reduction in impingement free range of motion, potential alterations in muscle force vectors and lever arms, and impaired proprioception due to muscle fibre reorientation. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(3):180–188

Introduction: Defects in rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee replacements (TKR) may cause poor alignment of the extensor apparatus. There are numerous references concerning the correct alignment of the femoral component of a prosthesis: transepicondylar axis, anteroposterior axis, and posterior condylar axis. Materials and methods: Computer-assisted measurement of the relative differences between the transepicondylar axis, anteroposterior axis and posterior condylar axis in 38 TKR patients, excluding those with varus or valgus deformity greater than 15 degrees. Results: The difference between the anteroposterior axis and the transepicondylar axis was 3.13 degrees of external rotation in the former. Between the posterior condylar axis and the transepicondylar axis it was 1.18 degrees of internal rotation in the former. Between the anteroposterior axis and the posterior condylar axis it was 5.51 degrees of external rotation of the former. Conclusions: Probably the transepicondylar axis is the best landmark to enable reproducing the biomechanics of the knee in a patient bearing a prosthesis, although it is often difficult to reproduce it precisely. Several studies have noted errors among observers that are too great to make us feel certain that we are doing the best thing. Although it is accepted that the perpendicular to the anteroposterior axis is reliable and corresponds to 4° of external rotation in relation to the posterior condylar axis, we have observed significant differences from one patient to another. It would seem preferable to use a combination of the different axes, which we can do with a surgical browser

Introduction: Correct rotational alignment of the femoral component is an important factor for successful total knee arthroplasty. This study evaluated relationship between the transepicondylar axis and the posterior condylar axis in normal, varus, and valgus knees. Methods: Thirty normal knees (mean age: 66.2 years), 30 osteoarthritic knees with varus deformity (67.9 years), and 25 osteoarthritic knees with valgus deformity (70.7 years) were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging. Femo-rotibial angle on standing anteroposterior radiograph was 185° in the varus knees and 166.1° in the valgus knees. In the transverse view, the angle between the transepicondylar axis and the posterior condylar axis, and the angle between the line perpendicular to the anteroposterior (AP) axis and the posterior condylar axis were measured in each group. Results: Transepicondylar line showed 6.4° of external rotation in the normal knees and 6.1 of external rotation in the varus knees relative to the posterior condylar axis. However, transepicondylar axis of the valgus knee showed 11.6° of external rotation. This angle was significantly larger than that of normal knee and varus knee (p < 0.05). The line perpendicular to the AP axis was externally rotated from the posterior condylar axis in 6.3° in the normal knees, 6.6° in the varus knees, and 8.8° in the valgus knees. The external rotational angle in the valgus knees was significantly larger than that of the normal and varus knees (p < 0.05). Discussion and conclusion: These results suggest that there is no hypoplasia of the posterior part of the medial condyle in varus knees, however, posterior part of the lateral condyle in valgus knee is severely distorted. Based on the results of this study, 3 to 5 degrees of external rotation relative to the posterior condyles is not large enough to achieve correct rotational alignment for valgus knees

Over 80% of patients are satisfied following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Female gender was one of the factors found to be a predictor of poorer satisfaction. The landmarks commonly used to achieve correct rotation of the femoral component are the posterior condylar axis, the transepicondylar axes (TEA) & the anteroposterior axis (Whiteside’s line) of the distal femur. The design features of most conventional jig based TKA instrumentation assumes a constant relationship of 3 degrees external rotation between the posterior condylar axis & the epicondylar axis. However during TKA using computer assisted navigation, we observe that these rotational landmarks do not have a constant relationship & there is wide variation among the arthritic population & between the male & female rotational profile. We hypothesise no consistent relationship between the posterior condylar axis, the TEA & the anteroposterior axis of the distal femur. 125 Computerised Tomography (CT) scans of the knee were performed using a 3D helical CT scanner in subjects who did not have any pre-existing clinical & radiological evidence of knee arthritis. CT slices 3 mm in thickness were obtained over the distal femur from the level of the proximal pole of the patella. Standard protocols were established for identifying the bony landmarks & taking measurements. The posterior condylar axis, the TEA & the anteroposterior axis were constructed. The condylar twist angle (CTA), the posterior condy-lar angle (PCA) & the angles made by the TEA & the line perpendicular to the anteroposterior axis were then measured using the PACSWEB digital measurement tools. The data was analysed to determine the consistency of the angular relationship between the reference axes using the STATA data analysis & statistical software. Linear regression was used to investigate any differences in the angle measurements between genders. 125 CT scans of the knee were performed in 111 patients (60 males [65 knees] & 51 females [60 knees]). The mean age was 45 years (SD, 15 years). The results showed no significant difference between the rotational axes of the distal femur between men & women (CTA male(SD): female(SD): 5.9(1.6): 6.3(2.0) [p=0.317], PCA male(SD): female(SD): 2.3(1.5): 2.5(1.9) [p=0.648]). The results also showed it would be inappropriate to assume a constant relationship of 3 degress external rotation between the posterior condylar axis & the epicondylar axes (PCA mean (SD) 2.39(1.70) [p< 0.001], CTA mean (SD) 6.11(1.81) [p< 0.001]). Our study suggests no significant difference between the rotational reference axes of the distal femur between men & women. Furthermore, most jig-based systems result in 3 degress external rotation of the femoral component. Our results show this is not consistent & may be responsible for the pain in 20% of patients post TKA because of abnormal patellar tracking

Aims. The objective of this study is to assess the use of ultrasound (US) as a radiation-free imaging modality to reconstruct 3D anatomy of the knee for use in preoperative templating in knee arthroplasty. Methods. Using an US system, which is fitted with an electromagnetic (EM) tracker that is integrated into the US probe, allows 3D tracking of the probe, femur, and tibia. The raw US radiofrequency (RF) signals are acquired and, using real-time signal processing, bone boundaries are extracted. Bone boundaries and the tracking information are fused in a 3D point cloud for the femur and tibia. Using a statistical shaping model, the patient-specific surface is reconstructed by optimizing bone geometry to match the point clouds. An accuracy analysis was conducted for 17 cadavers by comparing the 3D US models with those created using CT. US scans from 15 users were compared in order to examine the effect of operator variability on the output. Results. The results revealed that the US bone models were accurate compared with the CT models (root mean squared error (RM)S: femur, 1.07 mm (SD 0.15); tibia, 1.02 mm (SD 0.13). Additionally, femoral landmarking proved to be accurate (transepicondylar axis: 1.07° (SD 0.65°); posterior condylar axis: 0.73° (SD 0.41°); distal condylar axis: 0.96° (SD 0.89°); medial anteroposterior (AP): 1.22 mm (SD 0.69); lateral AP: 1.21 mm (SD 1.02)). Tibial landmarking errors were slightly higher (posterior slope axis: 1.92° (SD 1.31°); and tubercle axis: 1.91° (SD 1.24°)). For implant sizing, 90% of the femora and 60% of the tibiae were sized correctly, while the remainder were only one size different from the required implant size. No difference was observed between moderate and skilled users. Conclusion. The 3D US bone models were proven to be closely matched compared with CT and suitable for preoperative planning. The 3D US is radiation-free and offers numerous clinical opportunities for bone visualization rapidly during clinic visits, to enable preoperative planning with implant sizing. There is potential to extend its application to 3D dynamic ligament balancing, and intraoperative registration for use with robots and navigation systems. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):81–86

Background. The importance of total ankle replacement (TAR) implant orientation in the axial plane is poorly understood with major variation in surgical technique of implants on the market. Our aims were to better understand the axial rotational profile of patients undergoing TAR. Methods. In 157 standardised CT Scans of end-stage ankle arthritis patients planning to undergo primary TAR surgery, we measured the relationship between the knee posterior condylar axis, the tibial tuberosity, the transmalleolar axis(TMA) and the tibiotalar angle. The foot position was measured in relation to the TMA with the foot plantigrade. The variation between medial gutter line and the line bisecting both gutters was assessed. Results. The mean external tibial torsion was 34.5±10.3°(11.8–62°). When plantigrade the mean foot position relative to the TMA was 21±10.6°(0.7–38.4°) internally rotated. As external tibial torsion increased, the foot position became more internally rotated relative to the TMA(pearson correlation 0.6;p< 0.0001). As the tibiotalar angle became more valgus, the foot became more externally rotated relative to the TMA(pearson correlation −0.4;p< 0.01). The mean difference between the medial gutter line and a line bisecting both gutters was 4.9±2.8°(1.7°-9.4°). More than 51% of patients had a difference greater than 5°. The mean angle between the medial gutter line and a line perpendicular to the TMA was 7.5°±2.6°(2.8°-13.7°). Conclusion. There is a large variation in rotational profile of patients undergoing TAR, particularly between the medial gutter line and the transmalleolar axis. Surgeon designers and implant manufacturers need to develop consistent methods to guide surgeons towards judging appropriate axial rotation of their implanton an individual basis. We recommend careful clinical assessment and CT scanspre-operatively to enable the correct rotation to be determined

Background. Accurate implant positioning is of supreme importance in total knee replacement (TKR). The rotational profile of the femoral and tibial components can affect outcomes, and the aim is to achieve coronal conformity with parallelism between the medio-lateral axes of the femur and tibia. Aims. The aim of this study is to determine the accuracy of implant rotation in total knee replacement. Methods. Intra-operatively, the trans-epicondylar axis of the femur (TEA) and Whiteside's line were used as the reference points, aiming to externally rotate the femoral component by 1 degree. The medial third of the tibial tuberosity was used as the anatomical reference point, aiming to reproduce the rotation of the native tibia. Pre-and post-operative CT scans were reviewed. The difference in femoral rotation was calculated by determining the femoral posterior condylar axis (PCA) of the native femur pre-operatively and the implant post-operatively. Tibial rotational difference was calculated between the native tibial posterior condylar axis and tibial baseplate. Results. Pre and post-operative CT scans of 41 knees in 31 patients were analysed. All surgeries were carried out by a single surgeon using the same implant. The mean difference in rotation of the femur post-operatively was 1.2 degrees external rotation (ER), range −4.7 to 6.9 degrees ER. 83% of femoral components were within 3 degrees of the target rotation. Mean difference in tibial rotation was −3.8 degrees ER, range −11.1 to 12.4 ER. Only 39% of tibial components were within 3 degrees of the target rotation. A line perpendicular to the midpoint of the tibial PCA was actually medial to the tibial tubercle in 33 knees, and only corresponded to the medial 1/3 of the tibial tubercle in 8 of 41 knees. Conclusions. Femoral component rotation is seen to be more accurate than tibial in this group. It may be that the anatomical landmarks used intra-operatively to judge tibial rotation are more difficult to accurately identify. Posterior landmarks are difficult to locate in vivo. This study would suggest that using the anterior anatomical landmark of the medial 1/3 of the tibial tubercle does not allow accurate reproduction of tibial rotation in total knee replacement

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the anterior femoral cortical line (AFCL) as an additional anatomical landmark for determining intraoperative femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. The AFCL was compared with the Epicondylar axis, the anteroposterior (AP) axis (Whiteside’s line), and the posterior condylar axis. Dry bone, cadaver, MRI and intra-operative measurements were compared. Methods: Fifty dry bone femora, and 16 wet cadaveric specimens were assessed to identify the AFCL and this was compared against the 3 reference axes discussed above. Photographs were taken of the specimens with K-wires/marker pins secured to the reference axes and then a digital on-screen goniometer was used to determine the mean angular variations with respect to the Epipcondylar axis. In the clinical trial, 58 consecutive patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were included. After a routine exposure the AP axis was marked on each distal femur. The AFCL was then identified and the anterior femoral cortical cut was made parallel to this line. The angle between this cortical cut and the perpendicular to the AP axis was measured using a sterile goniometer. In the MRI study, 50 axial knee images were assessed and the most appropriate slice/s determined in order to identify the AFCL and the other 3 reference axes and then their relationship was measured by an on-screen goniometer. Results: In the cadaveric study the AFCL was a mean 1° externally rotated to the epicondylar axis (SD = 5°), White-side’s line was 1° externally rotated (SD = 4°) and the posterior condylar axis was 1° internally rotated (SD = 2°). By MRI and with respect to the epicondylar axis, the AFCL was a mean 5° externally rotated (SD= 3), White-side’s Line was 1° externally rotated (SD = 2) and the posterior condylar axis was 3° internally rotated (SD = 2). In the clinical study in 8 patients it was impossible to draw the AP axis because of dysplasia or destruction of the trochlea by osteoarthrosis. In the remainder the mean difference between the anterior femoral cortical line and Whiteside’s AP axis was 4.1 degrees internally rotated (SD = 3.8°). The lateral release rate for this cohort was 4%. Conclusion: The anterior femoral cortical line provides an additional reference point, completing the ‘compass points’ around the knee. It has been shown in this study to be reliable in the laboratory, on MRI and in a clinical setting for assessing rotation of the femoral component. It may prove particularly useful when one or all of the other reference axes are disturbed such as in revision TKR, lateral condylar hypoplasia or where there has been previous epicondylar trauma

Introduction. Three anatomic landmarks are typically used to estimate proper femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty: the transepicondylar axis (TEA), Whiteside's line, and the posterior condylar axis (PCA). Previous studies have shown that the presence of tibia vara may be accompanied by a hyperplastic posteromedial femoral condyle, which affects the relationship between the PCA and the TEA. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of tibia vara with the PCA. Methods. Two hundred and forty-eight knees underwent planning for total knee arthroplasty with MRI. The MRI was used to characterize the relationship between the transepicondylar axis and the posterior condylar axis. Long-leg standing films (LLSF) were obtained to evaluate the medial proximal tibial angle. The MPTA is defined as the medial angle formed between a line along the anatomic axis of the tibia and a line along the tibial plateau. Results. There were 168 knees in varus and 80 in valgus. The PCA in the patient group was 2.38 degrees ± 1.6 degrees. Regression analysis of tibial varus compared to the PCA showed a small association where for each degree of tibial varus, there was an additional 0.07 degrees of internal rotation of the PCA (p = 0.01). When defining tibia vara as a MPTA <84 degrees, there was no difference between patients with and without tibia vara (p=0.0661) although there was a trend toward a smaller PCA with increased tibia vara. When defining tibia vara as a MPTA <82 degrees there was again no difference in PCA between patients with and without tibia vara (p=0.825). Conclusion. Tibia vara did not influence the PCA to a clinically significant degree. This result is in contrast to previous studies which indicated that increased tibial varus correlated to increased internal rotation of the PCA with respect to the TEA

Introduction. Positioning of a femoral sizing guide has been cited as being a critical intraoperative step during measured-resection based TKA as it determines femoral component rotation. Consequently, modern femoral sizing guides permit surgeons to ‘dial in’ external rotation when placing the guide. Although this feature facilitates guide placement, its effect on posterior femoral condylar resection and flexion gap stability is unknown. This study examines the effect of rotation on posterior femoral condylar resection among different posterior-referencing TKA designs. Methods. Left-sided posterior-referencing femoral sizing guides and cutting blocks from nine posterior-referencing femoral sizing guides belonging to six TKA manufacturers were collected. Each guide underwent high-resolution photography at a setting of zero, three and greater than three degrees of external rotation. The axis of rotation for each guide was then identified and its location from the posterior condylar axis was recorded (figure). Cutting blocks from each system were then photographed and the amount of posterior condylar resection from the medial and lateral condyles was calculated for each setting of external rotation (figure). The posterior resection was then compared to the standard distal resections for each system. Results. Two sizing guides had axes of rotation that were eccentrically located and in proximity to the posterior condylar axis, six were centrally based and one was slightly eccentric. Axis of rotation location had substantial effects on posterior condylar resection. Guides with centrally-based axes tended to resect more medial posterior condyle and less lateral condyle as rotation increased. Guides with eccentric axes tended to resect either less lateral or more medial condyle only. Discussion. This study is the first to investigate femoral rotation and posterior condylar resection, and the first to compare different sizing guide designs. Our results indicate that guides with centrally-based axes of rotation increase medial condylar resection as external rotation increases. This increased resection may unintentionally create a larger flexion gap in the case of a valgus knee

The appearance of the ‘grand-piano sign’ on the anterior resected surface of the femur has been considered to be a marker for correct femoral rotational alignment during total knee replacement. Our study was undertaken to assess quantitatively the morphological patterns on the resected surface after anterior femoral resection with various angles of external rotation, using a computer-simulation technique. A total of 50 right distal femora with varus osteoarthritis in 50 Korean patients were scanned using computerised tomography. Computer image software was used to simulate the anterior femoral cut, which was applied at an external rotation of 0°, 3° and 6° relative to the posterior condylar axis, and parallel to the surgical and clinical epicondylar axes in each case. The morphological patterns on the resected surface were quantified and classified as the ‘grand-piano sign’, ‘the boot sign’ and the ‘butterfly sign’. The surgeon can use the analogy of these quantified sign patterns to ensure that a correct rotational alignment has been obtained intra-operatively

Femoral component malrotation is a major cause of patello-femoral complications in total knee arthroplasty. In addition, it can affect varus/valgus stability during flexion which can lead to increased tibiofemoral wear. Debate exists on where exactly to rotate the femoral component. The three principal methods utilise different anatomical landmarks: the posterior condylar axis, the transepicondylar axis and the antero-posterior axis (Whiteside’s line). A prospective randomised controlled trial was undertaken. Sixty consecutive patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty by a single surgeon (LML) at the Royal Perth Hospital were randomised into 3 groups based on the intra-operative method for measuring femoral rotation using the PFC sigma prosthesis (Depuy) with computer navigation (Depuy/Brainlab). All patients received the usual post-operative treatment, rehabilitation and JRAC (Joint Replacement Assessment Clinic) follow up. All underwent a CT scan according to the Perth CT protocol designed specifically to accurately measure component alignment and rotation. No significant difference in femoral rotation was found between the three groups using a one-way analysis of variance (p=0.67). However, Whiteside’s line had a significantly greater variability than the posterior condylar or transepicondylar axis using the F Test for variances (p=0.02, p=0.03). In conclusion, whilst there was no significant difference in femoral rotation, Whiteside’s line did show greater variability (−6° to 3°), and therefore we recommend the use of either the transepicondylar or posterior condylar axis in Total Knee Replacement

The success of TKAs depends on the restoration of correct knee alignment and proper implant sizing and placement. The mechanical axis is considered a key factor in the restoration of knee alignment along with the transepicondylar axis and the posterior condylar axis as references for external and internal implant rotation. Accurate calculation of the distal resection plane in the femur and proximal resection plane in the tibia is crucial to determine the amount of the bone to be resected. In this study, we developed a model for mapping the thickness of the femoral and tibial articulating cartilage. We also studied the effect of cartilage presence and the absence on the accuracy of calculating the surgical landmarks, implant sizing and placement. Cartilage models were constructed using fat suppression MRI scans of healthy individuals with different body sizes. The femoral and tibial cartilages were segmented and surface models were generated. The inner and outer surfaces of the cartilage were separated, the inner surfaces were then mapped to the articulating surface of the femur and tibia to establish correspondence between the cortical bone surface and the inner surface of the cartilage. For each vertex on the normalized inner surface of the cartilage, the closest point was found on the outer surface of the cartilage and the normal distances were calculated. These distances were then averaged for each vertex across the population to calculate an average cartilage model. This average cartilage model was then used to grow a cartilage layer on our database of 300 bones from CT scans. Surgical landmarks and implant sizing and placement were then calculated for each bone before and after the cartilage and results were compared. Some of the landmarks including the mechanical and transepicondylar axes were found to be independent from the presence or absence of knee articulating cartilage, whereas the posterior condylar axis and tibial and femoral resection planes can be affected by the absence or presence of cartilage

Introduction:: Various reference axes are used in total knee arthroplasty to determine the femoral rotation including transepicondylar axis, posterior condylar axis and Whiteside’s line. However, there are currently no golden standards as to the ideal axes to determine the true femoral rotation. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was performed to analyse the various axes used to determine femoral rotation during total knee replacement. All consecutive patients who underwent MRI of the knee between December 2006 and May 2007 were considered to be included in the study. Patients below the age of 20 years, above the age of 40 years and mass lesions obscuring the bony landmarks were excluded. The transepicondylar, posterior condylar, posterior femoral cortical, anterior femoral cortical and tibial anteroposterior axes were measured on the PACS system. Results: Of the 100 patients, there were 75 males and 25 females with a mean age of 31(20–39) years. The mean relation between the posterior condylar axes and transepicondylar axes was 3.9 (SD−1.71, 95% CI 3.58–4.26), posterior condylar axes and posterior femoral cortical axes was 5.85 (SD−2.76, CI 5.3–6.4), posterior condylar axis and anterior cortical axis was 6.21 (SD−3.09, CI 5.6–6.8) and posterior condylar axes and tibial anteroposterior axes was 89.6 (SD−5.18, CI 88.5–90.6). Conclusion: The transepicondylar axis appears to be the most consistent amongst the landmarks used to determine femoral rotation. However even the transepicondylar axis shows a significant variation. If transepicondylar axis is not available we suggest the use of femoral anterior cortical axes as a reference landmark

The rotational alignment of the tibia is an unresolved issue in knee replacement. A poor functional outcome may be due to malrotation of the tibial component. Our aim was to find a reliable method for positioning the tibial component in knee replacement. CT scans of 19 knees were reconstructed in three dimensions and orientated vertically. An axial plane was identified 20 mm below the tibial spines. The centre of each tibial condyle was calculated from ten points taken round the condylar cortex. The tibial tubercle centre was also generated as the centre of the circle which best fitted eight points on the outside of the tubercle in an axial plane at the level of its most prominent point. The derived points were identified by three observers with errors of 0.6 mm to 1 mm. The medial and lateral tibial centres were constant features (radius 24 mm (. sd. 3), and 22 mm (. sd. 3), respectively). An anatomical axis was created perpendicular to the line joining these two points. The tubercle centre was found to be 20 mm (. sd. 7) lateral to the centre of the medial tibial condyle. Compared with this axis, an axis perpendicular to the posterior condylar axis was internally rotated by 6° (. sd. 3). An axis based on the tibial tubercle and the tibial spines was also internally rotated by 5° (. sd. 10). Alignment of the knee when based on this anatomical axis was more reliable than either the posterior surfaces or any axis involving the tubercle which was the least reliable landmark in the region

The relationships between the transepicondylar axis (TEA), Whiteside's line(WL), and posterior condylar axis (PCA) are commonly used to determine the rotational alignment of the femur in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It has been previously reported that may be gender differences in the rotational and mechanical anatomy of the distal femur1. The aim of our study was to examine the distal femur in a large number of patients to report on any gender differences within the group. The MRIs of a large cohort of prospectively chosen patients (n= 217) were examined retrospectively in order to determine the rotational femoral alignment. Varus/valgus relationship of their knees prior to prosthesis insertion was also examined. Measurements pertained to femoral rotation (relationships between WL, TEA and PCA) and varus/valgus alignment were calculated directly from MRI studies by a single observer. Gender differences were examined using an unpaired students t-test. Averages and standard deviations are reported to within two significant figures. The posterior condylar axis was 2.6 ± 1.5 degrees relative to the transepicondylar axis and 91.8 ± 1.7 degrees relative to Whiteside's line. The varus to valgus ratio was 4.6 ± 5.9. Males in the group had a PCA of 2.4 ± 1.6 degrees relative to TEA compared to females in the group (2.8 ± 1.4 degrees). There was no significant difference between both groups (p=0.06). The PCA relative to WL was 92.1 ± 1.6 degrees for males compared to 91.6 ± 1.9 degrees for females with no significant difference between both groups (p=0.06). Finally, the varus to valgus ratio was 5 ± 5.7 for males compared to females (4.3 ± 6.2) with no statistical significance achieved between both groups (p=0.39). Our results show that there is no significant difference in the rotational anatomy and varus/valgus alignment between men and women in a large cohort. Interestingly, the large standard deviation for values pertaining to femoral rotational anatomy (>3 degrees) suggest a significant degree of variability between patients. Thus, operative planning embracing our findings may prove to be of great clinical benefit by advocating individualising operative treatment in TKA surgery

Introduction. The objective of this study is to assess the use of ultrasound (US) as a radiation free imaging modality to reconstruct three-dimensional knee anatomy. Methods. An OEM US system is fitted with an electromagnetic (EM) tracker that is integrated into the US probe, allowing for 3D tracking of probe and femur and tibia. The raw US RF signals are acquired and using real time signal processing, bone boundaries are extracted. Bone boundaries are then combined with the EM sensor information in a 3D point cloud for both femur and tibia. Using a statistical shape model, the patient specific surface is reconstructed by optimizing bone geometry to match the point clouds. An accuracy analysis was then conducted for 11 cadavers by comparing the 3D US models to those created using CT scans. Results. The results revealed the US bone models were accurate compared to the CT models (Mean RMS: femur: 1.03±0.15 mm, tibia:1.11± 0.13). Also, femoral landmarking proved to be accurate (transepicondylar axis: 1.07±0.65°, Posterior condylar axis: 0.73±0.41° Distal condylar axis: 1.12±0.89°, Medial AP: 1.39±1.18 mm, Lateral AP: 1.56±1.15 mm, TEA width: 1.2±0.87 mm). Tibial landmarking errors were slightly higher (Posterior slope axis: 2 ±1.19° and Tubercle axis: 1.8±1.37°). The models were then used to evaluate implant sizing as, 90% of the femurs and 60% of the tibias were sized correctly, while the others were off only one size. Discussion. The 3D US bone models were proven to be accurate compared to CT and can be used for preoperative planning. 3D ultrasound is radiation free and offers numerous clinical opportunities for bone creation in minutes during their office visit, surgeon-patient pre-operative planning, implant sizing and selection, 3D dynamic ligament balancing and intra-operative registration for use with robots and navigation systems